Two–Child Policy’’ and the Continuation of Massive Crimes Against Women and Children

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Two–Child Policy’’ and the Continuation of Massive Crimes Against Women and Children CHINA’S NEW ‘‘TWO–CHILD POLICY’’ AND THE CONTINUATION OF MASSIVE CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN HEARING BEFORE THE CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION DECEMBER 3, 2015 Printed for the use of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.cecc.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 98–715 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Mar 15 2010 18:09 Apr 21, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 U:\DOCS\98715.TXT DEIDRE CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA LEGISLATIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS House Senate CHRIS SMITH, New Jersey, Chairman MARCO RUBIO, Florida, Cochairman ROBERT PITTENGER, North Carolina TOM COTTON, Arkansas TRENT FRANKS, Arizona STEVE DAINES, Montana RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois JAMES LANKFORD, Oklahoma DIANE BLACK, Tennessee BEN SASSE, Nebraska TIM WALZ, Minnesota SHERROD BROWN, Ohio MARCY KAPTUR, Ohio DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California MICHAEL HONDA, California JEFF MERKLEY, Oregon TED LIEU, California GARY PETERS, Michigan EXECUTIVE BRANCH COMMISSIONERS CHRISTOPHER P. LU, Department of Labor SARAH SEWALL, Department of State STEFAN M. SELIG, Department of Commerce DANIEL R. RUSSEL, Department of State TOM MALINOWSKI, Department of State PAUL B. PROTIC, Staff Director ELYSE B. ANDERSON, Deputy Staff Director (II) VerDate Mar 15 2010 18:09 Apr 21, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 U:\DOCS\98715.TXT DEIDRE CO N T E N T S STATEMENTS Page Opening Statement of Hon. Christopher Smith, a U.S. Representative from New Jersey; Chairman, Congressional-Executive Commission on China ....... 1 Pittenger, Hon. Robert, a U.S. Representative from North Carolina .................. 3 Lieu, Hon. Ted, a U.S. Representative from California ....................................... 4 Hultgren, Hon. Randy, a U.S. Representative from Illinois ................................ 5 Hartzler, Hon. Vicki, a U.S. Representative from Missouri ................................. 5 Eberstadt, Henry, Henry Wendt Scholar in Political Economy, The American Enterprise Institute ............................................................................................. 6 Littlejohn, Reggie, Founder and President, Women’s Rights Without Fron- tiers ....................................................................................................................... 8 Huang, Sarah, Women’s rights advocate ............................................................... 12 Li, Jennifer, Co-founder, China Life Alliance ....................................................... 14 Mosher, Steven W., President, Population Research Institute ............................ 17 APPENDIX PREPARED STATEMENTS Eberstadt, Henry ..................................................................................................... 32 Littlejohn, Reggie ..................................................................................................... 35 Huang, Sarah ........................................................................................................... 40 Li, Jennifer ............................................................................................................... 50 Mosher, Steven W. ................................................................................................... 51 Smith, Hon. Christopher, a U.S. Representative from New Jersey; Chairman, Congressional-Executive Commission on China ................................................ 57 Rubio, Hon. Marco, a U.S. Senator from Florida; Cochairman, Congressional- Executive Commission on China ........................................................................ 58 SUBMISSIONS FOR THE RECORD ‘‘How Many ‘Missing Females’ for China’s One Child Policy Era (1981– 2015)?,’’ submitted by Henry Eberstadt ............................................................. 60 Op-ed from the Wall Street Journal titled, ‘‘China’s New Two-Child Policy and the Fatal Conceit,’’ by Henry Eberstadt, dated October 29, 2015 ............ 66 Witness Biographies ................................................................................................ 67 (III) VerDate Mar 15 2010 18:09 Apr 21, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 U:\DOCS\98715.TXT DEIDRE VerDate Mar 15 2010 18:09 Apr 21, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 U:\DOCS\98715.TXT DEIDRE CHINA’S NEW ‘‘TWO–CHILD POLICY’’ AND THE CONTINUATION OF MASSIVE CRIMES AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN THURSDAY, DECEMBER 3, 2015 CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA, Washington, DC. The hearing was convened, pursuant to notice, at 10:02 a.m., in Room HVC 210, Capitol Visitor Center, Hon. Christopher Smith, Chairman, presiding. Also Present: Representatives Pittinger, Lieu, Hultgren, Pitts, and Hartzler; and Senators Brown and Daines. OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. CHRISTOPHER SMITH, A U.S. REPRESENTATIVE FROM NEW JERSEY; CHAIRMAN, CON- GRESSIONAL–EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON CHINA Chairman SMITH. Good morning to everybody. The Chinese Government has spent the past 35 years telling cou- ples what their families must look like. Thirty-five years of state-sponsored violence against women, in- cluding coerced abortions and involuntary sterilizations, in the name of population control. Thirty-five years of viewing children as excess baggage from the day they are conceived, particularly the girl child. Thirty-five years of wasting precious human capital and poten- tial, and 35 years of committing massive crimes against women and children, enabled by pro-abortion, non-governmental organiza- tions and the United Nations Population Fund, or the UNFPA. Despite the platitude and applause by some being heaped on Chi- na’s announced two-child policy, the proposal does not change the basic structure of coercive population control, and it is not some major reversal of policy to be lauded. And, this so-called reform is not even a done deal yet. According to the world-famous demographer, Dr. Nicholas Eberstadt, who will testify today, the one-child policy may become a two-child policy, but the coercive population control apparatus remains unchanged. Dr. Eberstadt says, ‘‘To be clear,’’ and I quote him here, ‘‘that shift has not yet taken place. To the contrary, just days after the October 29 announcement, China’s National Health and Family Planning Commission, which oversees the population program, em- phasized that the new norms were not yet, ‘valid’ and described the two-child policy as a ‘proposal,’ indicating furthermore that ‘this (1) VerDate Mar 15 2010 18:09 Apr 21, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 U:\DOCS\98715.TXT DEIDRE 2 proposal would have to be approved by Beijing’s legislature next year before it might eventually be enacted.’’ That said, the two-child policy may allow for more births, if en- acted, at some future date, but it does not remove the pernicious incentives given the local officials to pressure and force mothers to abort a child if the birth has not been approved by the state or is the couple’s third child. Chinese families are still not free to determine the size of their own families, nor does this policy erase the enormous physical and psychological damage imposed on women done by three-and-a-half decades of highly coercive birth limitations. We should not be applauding China’s policy. We should be insist- ing, however, that they abolish all birth limits forever. Chen Guangcheng, the famous Chinese legal advocate and human rights champion, calls China’s population control policies genocide. He calls for an international tribunal to vigorously inves- tigate these crimes against humanity. And Mr. Chen calls on the Obama administration to enforce existing U.S. law and bar Chinese officials associated with the policy from entry to the United States. I would note parenthetically that I wrote that law in 2000. The Admiral Nance-Meg Donovan Foreign Relations Act, there was a provision of that law, and I wrote it, and the Obama administra- tion has completely and utterly failed to enforce and implement its provisions. Today we are sending another letter—and I have asked this at multiple hearings over the last several years—asking the President to just simply implement the law, which he has not done. And, hopefully, we will get an answer back at least giving a reason why they have chosen not to implement a human rights law. The Chinese Government is not the only one culpable in this hei- nous crime against women and children. The U.N. Population Fund [UNFPA], as we know, helped fund birth restrictions, fund forced abortions and a massive and coercive family planning bureaucracy. Several years ago I had a face-to-face meeting in Beijing with Madame Peng Pei-yun, the bureaucrat in charge of China’s draco- nian population program. Madame Peng repeatedly told me that my concerns about coercion were unfounded and said the UNFPA was there. They were on the ground and found no coercion whatso- ever. Of course, that is a complete whitewash. The UNFPA has whitewashed China’s crimes for decades and continues to do so today. On their website, the UNFPA justifies its history in China, saying that they were tasked by the executive committee to help China and had to engage with China as a sov- ereign nation. Since 1994, the UNFPA claims that their efforts have focused
Recommended publications
  • Phd in Political Economy & Government 1992–2017
    Harvard Kennedy School Job Placement PHD IN POLITICAL ECONOMY & GOVERNMENT 1992–2017 Doctoral Programs Harvard Kennedy School 79 John F. Kennedy Street Littauer Building, Room 133 Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 www.hks.harvard.edu/phd [email protected] 617-496-4485 Updated 10/17 2016–2017 Marek Hlavac Sara Lowes Economics Teacher, UWC Adriatic Assistant Professor, Bocconi University Danial Lashkari Assistant Professor, Boston College, Department of Economics 2015–2016 Guilherme Lichand Assistant Professor, University of Zurich, Department of Economics 2014–2015 Mauricio Fernandez Duque James Mahon Post-doctoral Research Fellow, Harvard University Manager, Deloitte Tax, Transfer Pricing Division Angela Fonseca Galvis Jesse Schreger Assistant Professor, Universidad Javeriana Assistant Professor, Harvard Business School Sabrina Howell (Post-doc at Princeton, Department of Economics) Assistant Professor, New York University Stern, Oren Ziv Department of Finance Assistant Professor, Michigan State University, Akos Lada Economics Department (Post-Doc at Dartmouth College) Economist, Facebook, Core Data Science Division 2013–2014 Jessica Blankshain Arash Nekoei Assistant Professor, United States Naval College Assistant Professor of Economics, Institute for Joana Naritomi Economic Studies Assistant Professor of Economics, London Hye Young You School of Economics Assistant Professor, Vanderbilt University, Department of Political Science 2012–2013 Paul Novosad Assistant Professor of Economics, Dartmouth College 2011–2012 Tim Ganser Supreet Kaur
    [Show full text]
  • A CASE for LEGAL ABORTION WATCH the Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina
    HUMAN RIGHTS A CASE FOR LEGAL ABORTION WATCH The Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina A Case for Legal Abortion The Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina Copyright © 2020 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-8462 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org AUGUST 2020 ISBN: 978-1-62313-8462 A Case for Legal Abortion The Human Cost of Barriers to Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Argentina Summary ......................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 8 To the President of Argentina: .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to Remain Silent: Abortion and Compelled Physician Speech
    Boston College Law Review Volume 62 Issue 6 Article 8 6-29-2021 The Right to Remain Silent: Abortion and Compelled Physician Speech J. Aidan Lang Boston College Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Health Law and Policy Commons, Litigation Commons, and the Medical Jurisprudence Commons Recommended Citation J. A. Lang, The Right to Remain Silent: Abortion and Compelled Physician Speech, 62 B.C. L. Rev. 2091 (2021), https://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol62/iss6/8 This Notes is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT: ABORTION AND COMPELLED PHYSICIAN SPEECH Abstract: Across the country, courts have confronted the question of whether laws requiring physicians to display ultrasound images of fetuses and describe the human features violate the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. On April 5, 2019, in EMW Women’s Surgical Center, P.S.C. v. Beshear, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit joined the Fifth Circuit and upheld Ken- tucky’s law, thus rejecting a physician’s free speech challenge. The Supreme Court declined to review this decision without providing an explanation. The Sixth Circuit became the third federal appellate court to rule on such regulations, often referred to as “ultrasound narration laws” or “display and describe laws,” and joined the Fifth Circuit in upholding such a law against a First Amendment challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS ANNUAL REPORT July 1,1996-June 30,1997 Main Office Washington Office The Harold Pratt House 1779 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021 Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (212) 434-9400; Fax (212) 861-1789 Tel. (202) 518-3400; Fax (202) 986-2984 Website www. foreignrela tions. org e-mail publicaffairs@email. cfr. org OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, 1997-98 Officers Directors Charlayne Hunter-Gault Peter G. Peterson Term Expiring 1998 Frank Savage* Chairman of the Board Peggy Dulany Laura D'Andrea Tyson Maurice R. Greenberg Robert F Erburu Leslie H. Gelb Vice Chairman Karen Elliott House ex officio Leslie H. Gelb Joshua Lederberg President Vincent A. Mai Honorary Officers Michael P Peters Garrick Utley and Directors Emeriti Senior Vice President Term Expiring 1999 Douglas Dillon and Chief Operating Officer Carla A. Hills Caryl R Haskins Alton Frye Robert D. Hormats Grayson Kirk Senior Vice President William J. McDonough Charles McC. Mathias, Jr. Paula J. Dobriansky Theodore C. Sorensen James A. Perkins Vice President, Washington Program George Soros David Rockefeller Gary C. Hufbauer Paul A. Volcker Honorary Chairman Vice President, Director of Studies Robert A. Scalapino Term Expiring 2000 David Kellogg Cyrus R. Vance Jessica R Einhorn Vice President, Communications Glenn E. Watts and Corporate Affairs Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Abraham F. Lowenthal Hanna Holborn Gray Vice President and Maurice R. Greenberg Deputy National Director George J. Mitchell Janice L. Murray Warren B. Rudman Vice President and Treasurer Term Expiring 2001 Karen M. Sughrue Lee Cullum Vice President, Programs Mario L. Baeza and Media Projects Thomas R.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortions Date Ordered 920 Cherry S.E
    ORDER FORM black folders palm cards bumper stickers speaker •s forms . calendar label "Take A Stand" tabloid canvassing form T -shirts donation envelopes Why Michigan should vote "Yes for Life" brochure instruction sheet yard signs name tags Name ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Address _____________________________________________________________________ City/Zip _____________________________________________________________ Phone II -------------------------------- For office use only: MAIL TO: Committee to End Tax-Funded Abortions Date ordered 920 Cherry S.E. Date needed -------- Grand Rapids, MI 49506 Date mailed ------ [or call CHRISTOPHER ALFARO (616) 451-0601] Phone order received by--------- LIFESAVER T-SHIRT ORDER FORM CONFERENCE SPECIAL!!! Please Print Organization__________________ _ Contact person ------------------ Phone: ....:.,__---!,.( )____ _ Address __-=~----~-----~--~~~=-~~----~~~--=~=-~ (Please, no rural route numbers for UPS delivery purposes) Zip Code __ s Number of T-shirts (adult sizes): -- M --L -- X-L 2 T-shirts for $3.00 - $------" • Total Mail to: Committee to End Tax-Funded Abortions 920 Cherry, S.E. Grand Rapids, MI 49 506 Attention: Peggy Campbell - 90S6t IW 'sp!d~ pue.J~ ·:rs ':J33.QS A.u31J:J Ol6 suop.:mqv p3pun:~-xe.t pu3: o:J 33:J:J!WWO:J SUO!pOq\( papUn::I·XO! PU3 "V, UC uS8A, &10.1\ Thank You PAID FOR BY: The CommiHee to End Tax ~ Funded Abortions • 920 Cherry Street, S.E., Grand Rapids, Ml 49506 • (616) 451·0601 WE MUST PROTECT OUR NEW LAW! Together, we passed a new law, Public Act 59, which technically put an end to tax­ funded abortion in Michigan. Pro-abortion forces in our state, however, are trying to repeal P.A. 59 through a referendum vote next November. We must protect our new law! Your donation will be used to help win a referendum vote on tax-funded abortion.
    [Show full text]
  • Hidden Gulag: Interpreting Reports of Changes in the Prison Camps
    NORTH KOREA’S HIDDEN GULAG: INTERPRETING REPORTS OF CHANGES IN THE PRISON CAMPS 2011 Photo: Camp No. 22 2012 Photo: Camp No. 22 Guard Tower Still Standing. Guard Tower Has Been Razed. David Hawk H R N K *Cover satellite photographs courtesy of DigitalGlobe.* 2 TAblE OF contents Board of Directors.................................................................................3 Acknowledgements..............................................................................6 About the Author.................................................................................7 Introduction.........................................................................................9 I. Information Time Lags and the Changing Nature of Information About the Prison Camps.....................................................................10 New, but Limited, Sources of Information................................14 II. The Missing Prisoners from Camp No. 22........................................16 The Fate and Whereabouts of the Former Prisoners.................20 Where Did They Go?.................................................................21 III. Madang Haeje (Broad Clearance): The Dismantlement of Camp No. 18—A Precedent for Ending North Korea’s Political Prison Camp System..............................................................................................23 The Final Dismantlement of Camp No. 18................................28 A Model for the Dismantlement of the Kwan-li-so Prison Labor Camps?..........................................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Peacetime Demographic Crisis
    the national bureau of asian research nbr project report | may 2010 russia’s peacetime demographic crisis: Dimensions, Causes, Implications By Nicholas Eberstadt ++ The NBR Project Report provides access to current research on special topics conducted by the world’s leading experts in Asian affairs. The views expressed in these reports are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of other NBR research associates or institutions that support NBR. The National Bureau of Asian Research is a nonprofit, nonpartisan research institution dedicated to informing and strengthening policy. NBR conducts advanced independent research on strategic, political, economic, globalization, health, and energy issues affecting U.S. relations with Asia. Drawing upon an extensive network of the world’s leading specialists and leveraging the latest technology, NBR bridges the academic, business, and policy arenas. The institution disseminates its research through briefings, publications, conferences, Congressional testimony, and email forums, and by collaborating with leading institutions worldwide. NBR also provides exceptional internship opportunities to graduate and undergraduate students for the purpose of attracting and training the next generation of Asia specialists. NBR was started in 1989 with a major grant from the Henry M. Jackson Foundation. Funding for NBR’s research and publications comes from foundations, corporations, individuals, the U.S. government, and from NBR itself. NBR does not conduct proprietary or classified research. The organization undertakes contract work for government and private-sector organizations only when NBR can maintain the right to publish findings from such work. To download issues of the NBR publications, please visit the NBR website http://www.nbr.org.
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to an Abortion and Gender Discrimination: an Argument for Financial Abortion Narline Casimir
    Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Law School Student Scholarship Seton Hall Law 5-1-2013 The Right to an Abortion and Gender Discrimination: An Argument for Financial Abortion Narline Casimir Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship Recommended Citation Casimir, Narline, "The Right to an Abortion and Gender Discrimination: An Argument for Financial Abortion" (2013). Law School Student Scholarship. 193. https://scholarship.shu.edu/student_scholarship/193 THE RIGHT TO AN ABORTION AND GENDER DISCRIMINATION: AN ARGUMENT FOR FINANCIAL ABORTION Narline Casimir Introduction Gender biases and discrimination have created conditions where women were and in some instances are still considered the lesser of the two sexes. The issue of gender inequality is global. World news reports relates stories of women who are not given the same privileges as men.1 Certain cultures have assigned roles to women and they risk punishment or ostracism if they dare to step outside of the bounds that were created for them.2 Here, in the United States, women have come a long way with the right to vote and the opportunity to get an education alongside men. However, women still face instances of gender inequality regarding the issues of equal pay and equal treatment.3 However, there is one area in which women have the upper hand. That area is reproductive freedom through abortion. In Roe v. Wade4, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in favor of a woman’s right to choose to obtain an abortion prior to viability of the fetus.5 The Court gave deference to the effects of pregnancy on a woman and ignored the effects of abortion on men.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations and Private Actors
    Foundations and Private Actors Carol Adelman and Yulya Spantchak Abstract While Official Development Assistance (ODA) comprised the majority of resource flows in international development during much of the twentieth century, today private money, composed of philanthropy, remittances, and investment, significantly surpasses ODA. Additionally, with increased remittances, a more skilled labor force, open markets, and rise of communication technology, the developing world has also changed. Private actors in developing countries are taking on a larger role in the assistance process. These private flows have fundamentally transformed the way foreign aid is delivered: the private sector, with more flexibility and higher risk tolerance, is more likely to fund programs that government aid may not. This paradigm shift offers a great opportunity to reinvent official aid, allowing the aid community to better focus on Chapter 47 Page 1 Carol Adelman and Yulya Spantchak Foundations and Private Actors results, demand-driven development, transparency, and sustainability. This chapter covers the value of private flows, the actors involved, future developments in private-sector involvement in foreign assistance, and the impact of private flows on the development landscape. Keywords: Official Development Assistance, philanthropy, foreign aid, private development assistance, public-private partnerships, emerging economies, civil society Chapter 47 Page 2 Carol Adelman and Yulya Spantchak Foundations and Private Actors Introduction Traditionally, international development practitioners have placed value on government actors on both the donor and the receiver side. Official Development Assistance (ODA) often manifests itself in the transfer of public monies from a donor government into the hands of a recipient government. During much of the twentieth century, official flows comprised the majority of resource flows in international development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of RU-486 in the United States
    The Story of RU-486 in the United States The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation The Story of RU-486 in the United States (2001 Third Year Paper) Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8889480 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 I. THE BIRTH OF A CONTROVERSY 2 A. Background: What is RU-486 and How Does It Work? 2 B. The French Abortion Pill Fury 3 II. POLITICS AND CHEMISTRY MAKE A VOLATILE MIXTURE: \KEEPING THE ABORTION PILL BOTTLED UP IN FRANCE" 7 A. Moral Concerns 7 A. Moral Concerns 7 B. Corporate America's Lack of Interest 8 B. Corporate America's Lack of Interest 8 C. Supreme Court Jurisprudence's Impact on RU-486 10 D. Abortion Politics Goes Conservative 13 E. Regulatory Restrictions on Abortion 13 III. THE ABORTION TIDE BEGINS TO TURN 17 A. A New Administration 17 B. The Involvement of the Population Council 19 C. Concern From the Pro-Life Movement 22 1 IV. THE TIDE TURNS AGAIN { The Political Pendulum Swings to the Right 25 A. The Politics of Abortion Run Into The Contract With America 25 B. Conservative Congressional Legislation 27 V. THE FDA APPROVAL PROCESS GETS UNDERWAY 29 V.
    [Show full text]
  • Gibraltar Command Paper on Abortion British Pregnancy Advisory Service Response
    Gibraltar Command Paper on Abortion British Pregnancy Advisory Service Response The British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS) is a British reproductive healthcare charity that offers abortion care, contraception, STI testing, and pregnancy counselling to nearly 80,000 women each year via our clinics in Great Britain. We also treat women from Northern Ireland, Ireland, and Europe where their domestic laws prevent them accessing the care they need. As part of our advocacy work to enable the women we treat to get the best possible care, we campaign for the decriminalisation of abortion. We do not believe there are circumstances where it is ever appropriate to imprison a woman for making a decision about her own pregnancy Proposals BPAS welcomes this Command Paper and the desire to ensure that abortion law in Gibraltar is in line with human rights legislation. Based on our experience providing abortion care under the Abortion Act 1967 from which this proposal is transcribed, we have a number of proposals, produced in support of the proposals of local pro-choice groups, to ensure that international standards are met and women in Gibraltar are better able to access the care they need. These proposed changes would see the creation of abortion legislation similar to that of Ireland, the Isle of Man, France, and other European nations. Decriminalisation of women. There is no place in law for the continued criminalisation of women seeking to end their own pregnancies. It is out of step with most of Europe, with the USA, Canada, multiple states in America, and – most notably – with the new legislation being brought forward in Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • Bush Administration's Decision to Defund the United Nations Population Fund and Its Implications for Women in Developing Nations
    Recent Developments The Bush Administration's Decision to Defund the United Nations Population Fund and Its Implications for Women in Developing Nations Rachel Farkast I. INTRODUCTION In May 2002, due to continuing pressure to investigate the United Nations Population Fund's (UNFPA) alleged support of Chinese forced abortion and in- voluntary sterilization practices, the Bush administration sent an independent as- sessment team to evaluate the UNFPA's family planning programs in China.' Although the team concluded that the UNFPA has not "knowingly supported or participated in the management of a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization in the PRC [People's Republic of China], 2 the Bush administration nevertheless relied on a little-known statutory provision under The Foreign Op- erations, Export Financing and Related Programs Appropriations Act to cut $34 Copyright © 2003, The Regents of the University of California. t. J.D. Candidate, Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California at Berkeley. 1. S.REP. No. 107-219, at 54 (2002). 2. Press Release, U.S. Dep't of State, Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, Report of the China UNFPA Independent Assessment Team (May 29, 2002), at http://www.state.gov/ g/prm/rls/rpt/2002/12122pf.htm (last visited Jan. 29, 2003) [hereinafter Assessment Team Report]. BERKELEY WOMEN'S LAW JOURNAL BERKELEY WOMEN'S LAW JOURNAL million in funding that Congress had appropriated to the UNFPA.3 This recent development piece evaluates the policies behind the Bush ad- ministration's decision to cut the UNFPA's funding and illustrates that these policies fail to justify the cutting of funds intended for organizations such as the UNFPA, which are dedicated to helping developing countries address reproduc- tive health and population issues that are crucially important today.
    [Show full text]