Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) from Peruvian Ovenbirds (Passeriformes: Furnariidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) from Peruvian Ovenbirds (Passeriformes: Furnariidae) PROC. ENTOMOL. soc. WASH. 97(4), 1995, pp. 839-844 A NEW GENUS AND THREE NEW SPECIES OF CHEWING LICE (PHTHIRAPTERA: PHILOPTERIDAE) FROM PERUVIAN OVENBIRDS (PASSERIFORMES: FURNARIIDAE) ROGER D. PRICE AND DALE H. CLAYTON (RDP) Department of Entomology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078 (Current address) 4622 Kinkead Avenue, Fort Smith, Arkansas 72903; (DHC) Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OXI 3PS, England. Abstract.-The new genus Furnariphilus is described to include three new species from Peruvian hosts within the passerine family Fumariidae, subfamily Fumariinae: F. pagei, the type species of the genus, from Furnarius leucopus Swainson; F. griffithsi from Sclerurus mexican us Sclater; and F. parkeri from Sclerurus caudacutus (Vieillot). Key Words: Ectoparasites, Peru, Furnariphilus, Fumariinae, Bird Clayton et aL (1992) published a survey first time they are used. Host classification of chewing lice collected in 1985 from a follows that of Sibley and Monroe (1990). wide array of Peruvian bird taxa. During Holotypes of the new species will be de­ this project, a number of undescribed louse posited in The Field Museum (Chicago) taxa were collected from hosts in the parv­ and paratypes, as numbers allow, will be orders Thamnophilida and Fumariida (Pas­ located in the collections of that museum seriformes). These taxa included a new spe­ and those of the National Museum of Nat­ cies placed by Price and Clayton (1989) in ural History (Washington, D.C.), Oklahoma a new genus of Menoponidae, Kaysius. and State University (Stillwater), and the Uni­ seven new species described by Price and versity of Minnesota (St. Paul). Clayton (1993, 1994) in the existing phil­ opterid genus Rallicola Johnston and Har­ Furnariphilus Price and Clayton, rison. We have recently examined addition­ NEW GENUS al philopterid lice collected during the Pe­ Figs. 1-10 ruvian project from members of the Tham­ Type species: Furnariphilus pagei Price nophilida and Fumariida. Lice from three and Clayton, new species. species of ovenbirds (Fumariidae: Fumari­ Head (Figs. 1, 5) distinctly longer than inae) represent new species which are also wide, with preantennal region tapered to members of an undescribed genus. The pur­ truncate hyaline margin; conus small; with pose of this paper is to name and charac­ single very short ocular seta; dorsoanterior terize the new genus and to describe and head plate prominent, distinctly separated illustrate the three new species that com­ from remainder of head; male antenna with prise it. enlarged scape. In the following descriptions, all mea­ Prothorax (Figs. 1, 5) quadrangular, with surements are in millimeters. Abbreviations single seta near each lateroposterior comer. for measured structures are explained the Metathorax posteriorly broadened, each 840 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON 1 Figs. 1-5. Furnariphilus pagei. 1, Male. 2, Female ventral tenninalia. 3, Male genitalia. 4, Male tenninal segment. 5, Female. side with row of medium to very long mar­ dian setae, III-VIII each with 2, IX without ginal setae; prominent large rounded sternal median setae. Only terga V-IX with lateral plate with 4 setae. comer setae. Without pleural seta on II, Abdomen (Figs. 1,5,6, 10) slender, with with single short seta on III, medium seta distinct partial median division of terga on IV, long seta on V, and pair of long to I1(first apparent tergum)-VII for female, I1- very long setae on each of VI-VIII. Sterna IV for male. Male terga V-VIII much ll-VI prominent, undivided, each of II-V shorter than terga II-IV. Terga II with 4 me- with medioposterior pair of setae, VI with VOLUME 97, NUMBER 4 841 7 8 Figs. 6-10. Furnariphilus griffithsi. 6, Male metanotum and abdomen. 7, Female ventral terminalia. 8, Male genitalia. 9, Male terminal segment. 10, Female metanotum and abdomen. 2 or 4 posterior setae. Subgenital plate of ognized by the combination of head shape, female posteriorly with regular to irregular the sexually dimorphic antenna, the large row of short, stout spiniform setae along thoracic sternal plate, the anterior abdomi­ with finer setae posterior to them (Figs. 2, nal terga partially divided medially, the me­ 7). Both sexes with prominent tergum IX dian indentation of the terminal abdominal followed by smaller sclerites associated segment, the male with a small accessory with distinctly indented posterior margin; piece on each side of the last segment, the male with small accessory sclerite on each unique male genitalia with the short broad side of last tergal portion (Figs. 4, 9). parameres and complex mesomeral struc­ Male genitalia (Figs. 3, 8) distinctive, tures, and the female lacking any evidence with very short, stout widely-separated par­ of a prominent seta-bearing tubercle later­ ameres each bearing median sensillum and oposterior to the subgenital plate. terminal minute seta, complex mesomeral Of the philopterid lice associated with structures, and broad relatively short basal birds of these two host parvorders (Table apodeme. 1), Rallieola, the most widely distributed Discussion.-This genus is easily rec- genus with 30 species currently recognized, 842 PROCEEDINGS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON Table 1. Classification of the parvorders Thamnophilida and Fumariida with their associated philopterid lice. Host Lice (No. of Species) Parvorder Thamnophilida Family Tharnnophilidae (typical antbirds) Formicaphagus (12) Rallicola (1) Parvorder Fumariida Superfamily Fumarioidea Family Fumariidae Subfamily Fumariinae (ovenbirds) Rallicola (12) Fumariphilus (3) Picicola (3) Brueelia (2) Subfamily Dendrocolaptinae (woodcreepers) Rallicola (16) Superfamily Formicarioidea Family Formicariidae (ground antbirds) Formicaphagus (3) Formicaricola (8) Family Conopophagidae (gnateaters) Formicaphagus sp. Family Rhinocryptidae (tapaculos) Rallicola (1) shows certain affinities with the new genus ing tubercles posterior to the female sub­ described here. However, Rallieola females genital plate. However, they differ from are characterized by the prominent seta­ Furnariphilus in having both sexes with a bearing tubercle posterior to each side of distinct complete median division of ab­ the subgenital plate, the males have geni­ dominal terga II-VIII and without dimor­ talia with long slender parameres and rela­ phic antennae; the males with genitalia of a tively simple mesomeral structures, and grossly different type having ovoid para­ both sexes lack the marked medial inden­ meres, and with a rounded posterior abdo­ tation of the terminal abdominal portion. men; and the females lacking a delineated Additional lesser differences further sup­ terminal portion posterior to IX. The 15 port the distinction between these two gen­ recognized species of Formieaphagus are in era. The only other known philopterids both parvorders, with two additional unna­ from hosts within the superfamily Fuma­ med series in our collection from the Con­ rioidea are three species of Pieieola Clay opophagidae (Table 1); these lice differ and Meinertzhagen and two species of from Furnariphilus in having characteristic Brueelia Keler (Table 1), all of which are male genitalia similar to those of Formi­ quite different from Furnariphilus in gross earieola and both sexes with a distinctly head shape, genitalic features of both sexes, broader head and abdomen, in addition to and other differences associated with struc­ other differences. ture and chaetotaxy. Two other philopterid genera, Formiear­ Furnariphilus pagei Price and Clayton, ieola Carriker and Formieaphagus Carriker, NEW SPECIES are found on hosts within the superfamily Figs. 1-5 Formicarioidea and the parvorder Tham­ Type host.-Furnarius leueopus Swain­ nophilida (Table 1). The former currently son. has eight recognized species and is restrict­ Male.-As in Fig. 1. Preantennal head ed to hosts in the family Formicariidae, width (PAW), 0.30-0.33; temple width with seven known only from the genus For­ (TW), 0.38-0.39; head length (HL), 0.48- miearius. These lice are also of the Ralli­ 0.50. Prothorax width (PW), 0.26-0.28. cola-type, but lack the prominent seta-bear- Metanotum with 6-8 (usually 7) medium to VOLUME 97, NUMBER 4 843 long setae posteriorly on each side; meta­ contributions to the study of host-parasite thorax width (MW), 0.36-0.38. Abdominal cospeciation. terga with medium setae medially; sternal Furnariphilus griffithsi Price and setae shorter, with 4 on sternum VI. Ab­ Clayton, NEW SPECIES domen width at V (AWV), 0.42-0.45. La­ Figs. 6-10 teroposterior corner of IX with 2 medium to very long setae on each side. Terminal Type host.-Sclerurus mexicanus Sclater. portion with proportionately large accesso­ Male.-Head and thorax much as for F. ry piece on each side (Fig. 4). Genitalia pagei (Fig. 1). PAW, 0.33; TW, 0.40-0.41; (Fig. 3) with slightly curved parameres and HL, 0.52-0.54. PW, 0.27-0.29; metanotum complex of mesomeral structures as shown; medially with short pair of setae (Fig. 6) genitalia width (GW), 0.10-0.11; genitalia and with 7-8 (usually 8) medium to very length (GL), 0.23-0.25; genitalic paramere long posterior marginal setae on each side; length (GPL), 0.04-0.05. Total body length MW, 0.40. Abdomen as in Fig. 6. With (TL), 1.80-1.87. short median tergal setae; sternum VI with Female.-As in Fig. 5. Head (except for only single seta on each side. AWV, 0.46- smaller antennal scape), thorax, and much 0.49. Terminal segment with short acces­ of abdomen as for male. PAW, 0.34-0.36; sory piece on each side (Fig. 9). Genitalia TW, 0.41-0.43; HL, 0.53-0.55. PW, 0.29- (Fig. 8) with mesomeral posterior boundary 0.31; MW, 0.41-0.44. Differences from bilobed and extending near end of para­ male associated primarily with posterior ab­ meres; remainder of mesomeral structures dominal segments. With medium and very as shown; GW, 0.10-0.11; GL, 0.23-0.24; long lateroposterior ventral setae on each GPL, 0.05.
Recommended publications
  • Co-Extinct and Critically Co-Endangered Species of Parasitic Lice, and Conservation-Induced Extinction: Should Lice Be Reintroduced to Their Hosts?
    Short Communication Co-extinct and critically co-endangered species of parasitic lice, and conservation-induced extinction: should lice be reintroduced to their hosts? L AJOS R ÓZSA and Z OLTÁN V AS Abstract The co-extinction of parasitic taxa and their host These problems highlight the need to develop reliable species is considered a common phenomenon in the current taxonomical knowledge about threatened and extinct global extinction crisis. However, information about the parasites. Although the co-extinction of host-specific conservation status of parasitic taxa is scarce. We present a dependent taxa (mutualists and parasites) and their hosts global list of co-extinct and critically co-endangered is known to be a feature of the ongoing wave of global parasitic lice (Phthiraptera), based on published data on extinctions (Stork & Lyal, 1993; Koh et al., 2004; Dunn et al., their host-specificity and their hosts’ conservation status 2009), the magnitude of this threat is difficult to assess. according to the IUCN Red List. We list six co-extinct Published lists of threatened animal parasites only cover and 40 (possibly 41) critically co-endangered species. ixodid ticks (Durden & Keirans, 1996; Mihalca et al., 2011), Additionally, we recognize 2–4 species that went extinct oestrid flies (Colwell et al., 2009), helminths of Brazilian as a result of conservation efforts to save their hosts. vertebrates (Muñiz-Pereira et al., 2009) and New Zealand Conservationists should consider preserving host-specific mites and lice (Buckley et al., 2012). Our aim here is to lice as part of their efforts to save species. provide a critical overview of the conservation status of parasitic lice.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • The Mallophaga of New England Birds James Edward Keirans Jr
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 1966 THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS JAMES EDWARD KEIRANS JR. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation KEIRANS, JAMES EDWARD JR., "THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS" (1966). Doctoral Dissertations. 834. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/834 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 67—163 KEIRANS, Jr., James Edward, 1935— THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS. University of New Hampshire, Ph.D., 1966 E n tom ology University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE MALLOPHAGA OF NEW ENGLAND BIRDS BY JAMES E.° KEIRANS, -TK - A. B,, Boston University, i960 A. M., Boston University, 19^3 A THESIS Submitted to The University of New Hampshire In Partial Fulfillment of The Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate School Department of Zoology June, 1966 This thesis has been examined and approved. May 12i 1966 Date ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to express my thanks to Dr. James G. Conklin, Chairman, Department of Entomology and chairman of my doctoral committee, for his guidance during the course of these studies and for permission to use the facilities of the Entomology Department. My grateful thanks go to Dr. Robert L.
    [Show full text]
  • Armando C. Cicchino
    Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata FaFFaculdad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales Departamento de Biología TRABAJO PARA OPTAR AL PiojosPiojos (Insecta:(Insec Psocodea: Phthiraptera) parásitos de GruiformesGruiformes y Podicipediformes (Aves) en la Argentina DOCTORADOO EN CIENCIAS UnaU aproximación sistemática, bioecológica y evolutiva Armando C. Cicchino Agosto, 2011 Trabajo de tesis para optar al DOCTORADO EN CIENCIAS de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata Piojos (Insecta: Psocodea: Phthiraptera) Parásitos de Gruiformes y Podicipediformes (Aves) en la Argentina. Una aproximación sistemática, bioecológica y evolutiva. TESISTA: Prof. Armando C. Cicchino DIRECTOR: Dra. Norma Haydée Sardella CODIRECTOR: Dr. Guillermo M. Denegri Agosto 11 de 2011 ambiaré de opinión tantas veces y tan a menudo C como adquiera conocimien- tos nuevos. El día que me aperciba que mi cerebro ha dejado de ser apto para esos cambios, dejaré de trabajar. Florentino Ameghino oc absolvi, ut secundum hoc filum ariadneum ipse ducerem discipulos meos H per Naturae Meandros, et ut alios excitarem ad rerum natu- ralium minus cognitarum examen et descriptionem, cum alia terra alia producat: si hoc non displi- ceat artis genuinis Magistris, Histrionum fabulas, canumque latratus aquo animo excipiam. Carolus Linnaeus (1756) DISEÑO DE LA PORTADA Dr. Michel Paiva Valim Departamento de Parasitología Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brasil todos mis hijos, partí- cipes invisibles pero nece- A sarios de este empren- dimiento, el cual -lejos de constituir un pretendido requisito académico-, realmente no es más que un pequeño fragmento compartido de mi vida de todos los días. Cicchino 2011. Piojos parásitos de Gruiformes y Podicipediformes en la Argentina.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Mallophaga) from Birds in New Zealand
    A LIST OF THE CHEWING LICE (INSECTA: MALLOPHAGA) FROM BIRDS IN NEW ZEALAND R.L.C. PILGRIM Department of Zoology, University of Canterbury Christchurch, New Zealand and R.L. PALMA National Museum of New Zealand Wellington, New Zealand Jointly published as SUPPLEMENT TO NOTORNIS VOLUME 29 and NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NEW ZEALAND MISCELLANEOUS SERIES No. 6 by Ornithological Society of New Zealand and National Museum of New Zealand SEPTEMBER 1982 A LIST OF THE CHEWING LICE (INSECTA: MALLOPHAGA) FROM BIRDS IN NEW ZEALAND By R. L. C. PILGRIM and R. L. PALMA ABSTRACT Authenticated records of chewing (feather) lice, largely from unpub- lished observations, are listed from birds in the New Zealand zoogeo- graphic subregion, including the Ross Dependency in Antarctica. From a total of 388 host taxa (including 38 introductions), lice are reported from 250 hosts (including 27 introductions). These records comprise 267 lice species and subspecies; a further 138 recordsare listed at generic level only, but a11 these do not necessarily represent separate species. Although some bird groups have been collected from frequently, there are many gaps in our knowledge, even for thesehosts. With someorders (e.g. Passeriformes) and families of birds, little or no attention has been paid to their ectopara- sites. An appeal is made for assistance in building up collections. INTRODUCTION The New Zealand bird fauna is broadly characterised by the endemic order Aptervgiforrnes and, in comparison with other faunas, the exceptionally high proportion of tasa in the orders Procellariiformes and Sphenisciformes and in the family Phalacrotoracidae (Pelecaniformes) (Pilgrim, 1980). Since the genera of chewing (feather) lice are, in general terms, associated with particular groups of hosts, the louse fauna shows correspondingly a disproportionate representation of lice on the foregoing host groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Chewing and Sucking Lice As Parasites of Iviammals and Birds
    c.^,y ^r-^ 1 Ag84te DA Chewing and Sucking United States Lice as Parasites of Department of Agriculture IVIammals and Birds Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1849 July 1997 0 jc: United States Department of Agriculture Chewing and Sucking Agricultural Research Service Lice as Parasites of Technical Bulletin Number IVIammals and Birds 1849 July 1997 Manning A. Price and O.H. Graham U3DA, National Agrioultur«! Libmry NAL BIdg 10301 Baltimore Blvd Beltsvjlle, MD 20705-2351 Price (deceased) was professor of entomoiogy, Department of Ento- moiogy, Texas A&iVI University, College Station. Graham (retired) was research leader, USDA-ARS Screwworm Research Laboratory, Tuxtia Gutiérrez, Chiapas, Mexico. ABSTRACT Price, Manning A., and O.H. Graham. 1996. Chewing This publication reports research involving pesticides. It and Sucking Lice as Parasites of Mammals and Birds. does not recommend their use or imply that the uses U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesti- 1849, 309 pp. cides must be registered by appropriate state or Federal agencies or both before they can be recommended. In all stages of their development, about 2,500 species of chewing lice are parasites of mammals or birds. While supplies last, single copies of this publication More than 500 species of blood-sucking lice attack may be obtained at no cost from Dr. O.H. Graham, only mammals. This publication emphasizes the most USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 969, Mission, TX 78572. Copies frequently seen genera and species of these lice, of this publication may be purchased from the National including geographic distribution, life history, habitats, Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, ecology, host-parasite relationships, and economic Springfield, VA 22161.
    [Show full text]
  • Phthiraptera (Insecta): a Catalogue of Parasitic Lice from New Zealand
    2 Palma (2017) Phthiraptera (Insecta): a catalogue of parasitic lice from New Zealand EDITORIAL BOARD Dr R. M. Emberson, L. c/- Department of Ecology, P.O. Box 84, Lincoln University, New Zealand Dr M. J. Fletcher, NSW Agricultural Scientific Collections Unit, Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia Prof. G. Giribet, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. Dr R. J. B. Hoare, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Dr M.-C. Larivière, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Mr R. L. Palma, Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, P.O. Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand Dr C. J. Vink, Canterbury Museum, Rolleston Ave, Christchurch, New Zealand CHIEF EDITOR Prof Z.-Q. Zhang, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Associate Editors Dr T. R. Buckley, Dr R. J. B. Hoare, Dr M.-C. Larivière, Dr R. A. B. Leschen, Dr D. F. Ward, Dr Z. Q. Zhao, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Honorary Editor Dr T. K. Crosby, Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, New Zealand Fauna of New Zealand 76 3 Fauna of New Zealand Ko te Aitanga Pepeke o Aotearoa Number / Nama 76 Phthiraptera (Insecta) A catalogue of parasitic lice from New Zealand by Ricardo L. Palma Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] Auckland, New Zealand 2017 4 Palma (2017) Phthiraptera (Insecta): a catalogue of parasitic lice from New Zealand Copyright © Landcare Research New Zealand Ltd 2017 No part of this work covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, elec- tronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping information retrieval systems, or otherwise) without the written permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • CATALOG of ENTOMOLOGICAL TYPES in the BISHOP MUSEUM Mallophaga
    Pacific Insects Vol. 20, no. 1: 5-17 30 January 1979 CATALOG OF ENTOMOLOGICAL TYPES IN THE BISHOP MUSEUM Mallophaga By JoAnn M. Tenorio1 Abstract: This catalog lists the holotypes of 66 species and allotypes of 18 species of Mallophaga deposited in the Bishop Museum. Locality data are provided, as are corrected or confirmed host identifications, for many ofthe types. The Mallophaga collection in the Bishop Museum contains approximately 500 named species identified by specialists, preserved on some 6000 slides and in alcohol. The actual number of identified specimens is many more than would be indicated by the number of slides because of the practice of mounting a specimen of each sex side by side on the same slide. Much additional material is identified only to generic level. The bulk ofthe collection derives from New Guinea and the Solomons, the Pacific Basin, and the Oriental Region. Particularly extensive collections from New Guinea are still being studied and a large collection of Philippine Mallophaga is virtually unworked. This catalog includes holotypes and allotypes of all species actually or reportedly deposited in the Bishop Museum. The type collection comprises holotypes of 66 species, with allotypes associated with 18 of these. Paratypes are not included herein; the collection houses paratypes of more than 75 species. Approximately 72% ofthe primary types are from New Guinea and the Solomons. The format follows that outlined in the Introduction to the Bishop Museum En­ tomological Type Catalog by Radovsky et al. (1976). Names are listed as originally published and are entered alphabetically under families, also arranged in alphabetical order.
    [Show full text]
  • The Endangered Kiwi: a Review
    REVIEW ARTICLE Folia Zool. – 54(1–2): 1–20 (2005) The endangered kiwi: a review James SALES Bosman street 39, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; e-mail: [email protected] Received 13 December 2004; Accepted 1 May 2005 A b s t r a c t . Interest in ratites has necessitated a review of available information on the unique endangered kiwi (Apteryx spp.). Five different species of kiwis, endemic to the three islands of New Zealand, are recognized by the Department of Conservation, New Zealand, according to genetic and biological differences: the North Island Brown Kiwi (Apteryx mantelli), Okarito Brown Kiwi/Rowi (A. rowi), Tokoeka (A. australis), Great Spotted Kiwi/Roroa (A. haastii), and Little Spotted Kiwi (A owenii). As predators were found to be the main reason for declining kiwi numbers, predator control is a main objective of management techniques to prevent kiwis becoming extinct in New Zealand. Further considerations include captive breeding and release, and establishment of kiwi sanctuaries. Body size and bill measurements are different between species and genders within species. Kiwis have the lowest basal rates of metabolism compared with all avian standards. A relative low body temperature (38 ºC), burrowing, a highly developed sense of smell, paired ovaries in females, and a low growth rate, separate kiwis from other avian species. Kiwis have long-term partnerships. Females lay an egg that is approximately 400 % above the allometrically expected value, with an incubation period of 75–85 days. Kiwis mainly feed on soil invertebrate, with the main constituent being earthworms, and are prone to parasites and diseases found in other avian species.
    [Show full text]
  • (Phthiraptera: Amblycera and Ischnocera) on Birds of Peru
    Arxius de Miscel·lània Zoològica, 19 (2021): 7–52 ISSN:Minaya 1698– et0476 al. Checklist of chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Amblycera and Ischnocera) on birds of Peru D. Minaya, F. Príncipe, J. Iannacone Minaya, D., Príncipe, F., Iannacone, J., 2021. Checklist of chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Am- blycera and Ischnocera) on the birds of Peru. Arxius de Miscel·lània Zoològica, 19: 7–52, Doi: https://doi.org/10.32800/amz.2021.19.0007 Abstract Checklist of chewing lice (Phthiraptera: Amblycera and Ischnocera) on birds of Peru. Peru is one of the countries with the highest diversity of birds worldwide, having about 1,876 species in its territory. However, studies focused on chewing lice (Phthiraptera) have been carried out on only a minority of bird species. The available data are distributed in 87 publications in the national and international literature. In this checklist we summarize all the records to date of chewing lice on wild and domestic birds in Peru. Among the 301 species of birds studied, 266 species of chewing lice were recorded. The localities with the highest records were the Departments of Cusco, Junín, Lima and Madre de Dios. No records of birds pa- rasitized by these lice have been found in seven departments of Peru. Studies related to lice have only been reported in 16 % of bird species in the country, indicating that research concerning chewing lice has not yet been performed for the the majority of birds in Peru. Data published through GBIF (Doi: 10.15470/u1jtiu) Key words: Avifauna, Ectoparasites, Lice, Parasitology, Phthiraptera Resumen Lista de verificación de piojos masticadores (Phthiraptera: Amblycera e Ischnocera) de las aves de Perú.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Mallophaga of North America (North of Mexico), Which Reflects the Taxonomic Studies Published Since That Date
    The Genera and Species of the Mallophaga of North America (North of Mexico). Part I Suborder ISCHNOCERA by K. C. Emerson, PhD DEFENSE PEST MGMT INFO ANALYSIS CTR AFPMB, FOREST GLEN SECTION, WRAMC WASHINGTON, DC 20307-5001 ,PREFACE This volume is essentially a revision of my 1964 publication. Checklist of the Mallophaga of North America (north of Mexico), which reflects the taxonomic studies published since that date. Host criteria for the birds has been expanded to include consideration of all species listed in The A. 0. U. Check- list of North American Birds, Fifth Edition (1957)~A few species of birds definitely known to be extinct are omitted for the listings of probable hosts, even though new species may still be found on museum skins. Mammal hosts considered remain those Irecorded in Miller and Kellogg, List of North American Recent Mammals (1955), as being found north of Mexico. If the present volume of taxonomic studies of Mallophaga continues, another revision will be necessary in a few years. Much remains to be done on the taxonomy of several genera and host groups, especially the forms found on the Passeriformes . CONTENTS PHILOPTERIDAE Acidoproctus Acutifrons Anaticola Anatoecus Aquanirmus Ardeicola Brueelia Campanulotes Carduiceps Chelopistes Cirrophthirius Colinicola Coloceras Columbicol.a Craspedonirmus Craspedorrhyncbus Cuclotogaster Cuculicola Cuculoecus Cummingsiella Degeeriella Docophoroides Episbates Esthiopterum Falcolipeurus Fulicoffula Goniocotes Goniodes Haffneria Halipeurus Harrisoniella Ibidoecus Incidifrons Lagopoecus
    [Show full text]
  • Lice in My Life
    LICE IN MY LIFE K. C. EMERSON 1979 LICE IN MY LIFE by K. C. Emerson, Ph.D. 2704 North Kensington Street Arlington, Virginia 22207 Research Associate U. S. N. M., Smithsonian Institution Research Associate The K. C. Emerson Entomology Museum Oklahoma State University Collaborator United States Department of Agriculture Copyright 1979 by Dr. Kary Cadmus Emerson All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Why 3 Early history of research on lice 6 The changes begin 12 The new era in lice taxonomy 20 The past twenty years 29 Status of research on lice 44 The Anoplura Collection in the U.S.N.M. 59 The Mallophaga Collection in the U.S.N.M. 64 Medical Entomology and the Armed Forces 71 Ectoparasites in the K. C. Emerson Entomology Museum 77 Acknowledgments 80 Bibliography of entomology papers 86 All men of whatever quality they may be, who have done anything of excellence, or which may properly resemble excellence, ought, if they are persons of truth and honesty, to describe their life with their own hands. Benvenuto Cellini about 500 years ago INTRODUCTION For more than 40 years, working with lice (Mallophaga and Anoplura) has been one of the great pleasures of my life. My research has been interesting. It has been a pleasure to assist others under- stand the taxonomy, ecology and distribution of lice so that they can share my interest and then conduct research on their own. I have been able to provide good collections to The K. C. Emerson Entomology Museum at Oklahoma State University so that students there will not have to spend time in Washington, D.
    [Show full text]