DOCSLIB.ORG

Confucius and Lao Zi: Their Differing Social Foundations and Cultures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Confucius and Lao Zi: Their Differing Social Foundations and Cultures SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS Number 211 May, 2011 Confucius and Lao Zi: Their Differing Social Foundations and Cultures by ZHOU Jixu Victor H. Mair, Editor Sino-Platonic Papers Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104-6305 USA [email protected] www.sino-platonic.org SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS FOUNDED 1986 Editor-in-Chief VICTOR H. MAIR Associate Editors PAULA ROBERTS MARK SWOFFORD ISSN 2157-9679 (print) 2157-9687 (online) SINO-PLATONIC PAPERS is an occasional series dedicated to making available to specialists and the interested public the results of research that, because of its unconventional or controversial nature, might otherwise go unpublished. The editor-in-chief actively encourages younger, not yet well established, scholars and independent authors to submit manuscripts for consideration. Contributions in any of the major scholarly languages of the world, including romanized modern standard Mandarin (MSM) and Japanese, are acceptable. In special circumstances, papers written in one of the Sinitic topolects (fangyan) may be considered for publication. Although the chief focus of Sino-Platonic Papers is on the intercultural relations of China with other peoples, challenging and creative studies on a wide variety of philological subjects will be entertained. This series is not the place for safe, sober, and stodgy presentations. Sino- Platonic Papers prefers lively work that, while taking reasonable risks to advance the field, capitalizes on brilliant new insights into the development of civilization. Submissions are regularly sent out to be refereed, and extensive editorial suggestions for revision may be offered. Sino-Platonic Papers emphasizes substance over form. We do, however, strongly recommend that prospective authors consult our style guidelines at www.sino-platonic.org/stylesheet.doc. Manuscripts should be submitted as electronic files, preferably in Microsoft Word format. You may wish to use our sample document template, available here: www.sino-platonic.org/spp.dot. Beginning with issue no. 171, Sino-Platonic Papers has been published electronically on the Web at www.sino-platonic.org. Issues 1–170, however, will continue to be sold as paper copies until our stock runs out, after which they too will be made available on the Web. Please note: When the editor goes on an expedition or research trip, all operations (including filling orders) may temporarily cease for up to three months at a time. In such circumstances, those who wish to purchase various issues of SPP are requested to wait patiently until he returns. If issues are urgently needed while the editor is away, they may be requested through Interlibrary Loan. You should also check our Web site at www.sino-platonic.org, as back issues are regularly rereleased for free as PDF editions. Sino-Platonic Papers is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 2.5 License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 543 Howard Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. Confucius and Lao Zi: Their Differing Social Foundations and Cultures1 The Origins of the Civilization of the Yellow River, volume III by ZHOU Jixu Chinese Department, Sichuan Normal University Chengdu, Sichuan, PRC 610068 Translated by ZHOU Min Rongzhi College, Chongqing Technology and Business University Chongqing, PRC 400033 Abstract: Lao Zi and Confucius are the two great thinkers who have influenced Chinese culture for more than two thousand years, yet the thought of each differs considerably from that of the other. These differences originate in their respective social foundations and the cultures based on those foundations, but the difference in their social backgrounds has been ignored in previous studies. By observing several contrasting phenomena, we discover the different ways of life concealed behind these differing worldviews; this helps to fill in the fragmented history of the Chinese classics. The view of history presented here is also supported by some new findings of contemporary anthropology in the study of prehistoric society. Key words: Lao Zi, Confucius, ways of life, culture 1 The paper was presented at the Third International Symposium on Chinese Regional Culture and Language and the Academic Meeting between Hanyang University and Sichuan Normal University, October 2008, Chengdu, China. ZHOU Jixu, “Confucius and Lao Zi: Their Differing Social Foundations and Cultures” Sino-Platonic Papers, 211 (May 2011) The Separateness of Confucianism and Taoism Liu Xin (53 B.C.–23 A.D.) tried to conciliate the oppositions as well as the lesser differences between Confucianism and Taoism. Ban Gu (32 B.C.–92 B.C.) took up Liu’s idea (from Qilue by Liu Xin) in Yiwenzhi, Hanshu (Accounts of Literature, History of the Former Han Dynasty):2 The Taoist school may have originated with the official historians of ancient times. They noted down in an orderly way the changes of society, including its successes and failures, fortunes and disasters. As a result, they came to understand the key to managing a country. The Taoists observed the behavior of “quietness” and “actionlessness,” and maintained the attitude of modesty and meekness. This is the way that a monarch governs his nation. These ideas are in accordance with Yao’s “humility” and “modesty” in Yijing (The Book of Changes). Moreover, one could benefit by adopting the attitude of modesty. These are the advantages of Taoism. If some unrestrained men were to carry out the doctrines of Taoism, they would discard all rites and get rid of benevolence. They would reckon that one could administrate a country well by being quiet and actionless only. The above sounds very farfetched indeed. According to these ideas, Taoism was actually rooted in the official historians, taking Sima Qian (145 B.C.–90 B.C.) and his father as examples. However, it is very clear that Zuo Qiuming (556 B.C.–451 B.C.) was not a Taoist; he wrote Zuo Zhuan3 and Guo Yu.4 Confucius revised and edited The Spring and Autumn Annals; but this is a historical work. Shang Shu (The Book of Documents) is something like a historical record; however, it is also a Confucian masterpiece. There is a great deal of counterevidence against the 2 Qilue (七略) is one of the earliest Chinese ancient bibliographies by Liu Xin （刘歆）. The Yiwenzhi of Hanshu （汉书·艺文志） by Ban Gu （班固） is edited from Qilue. 3 Zuo Qiuming is the author of Zuo Zhuan, which is the first historical work in ancient China. 4 Guo Yu is one of the early historical documents of the individual kingdoms in the Spring and Autumn times. It is said that this work was edited by Zuo Qiuming as well. 2 ZHOU Jixu, “Confucius and Lao Zi: Their Differing Social Foundations and Cultures” Sino-Platonic Papers, 211 (May 2011) idea that Taoism might originate with the official historians. As to the words: “This is the way that a monarch governs his nation. These ideas are in accordance with Yao’s ‘humility’ and ‘modesty’ in Yijing (The Book of Changes),” but this is because the rulers in the Western Han dynasty (206 B.C.–8 A.D.) advocated the Huang-Lao theory.5 However, Lao Zi does not mention Yao and Shun, nor does it mention “the Five Classics.”6 The ideas of Liu Xin and Ban Gu were intended to make Taoism seem closer to Confucianism, in order to help the rulers govern the nation. But their ideas actually do not reflect reality. The words following “if some unrestrained men were to carry out the doctrines of Taoism (及放者为之…)” are depreciative remarks by Ban Gu, but that belief actually is an essential one in Taoism. Not only did “some unrestrained men” such as Zhuang Zi maintain the idea, but Lao Zi himself had said, “Banish wisdom, discard knowledge, and the people will be benefited a hundredfold. Banish human kindness, discard morality, and the people will be dutiful and compassionate. (绝圣去智，民利百倍；绝仁弃 义，民复孝慈)” (Chapter 19, Lao Zi). It can be seen that the idea was not from “unrestrained men”; instead, it is the original thought of Lao Zi. Until the middle period of the Early Han dynasty, the thinking in Confucianism and in Taoism were in opposition. In contradiction to the position taken by Liu Xin and Ban Gu, these two schools of thought were not related to each other. Sima Qian praises the thinking of Taoism but represses Confucian thought, as is noted in the “Biographies of Lao Zi and Han Fei” in Shi Ji (Historical Records): Confucius went to the capital of Zhou, where he wanted to consult Lao Zi on rites. Lao Zi told him: “Concerning what you are saying, these peoples’ bodies and their bones have been rotten for a long time. Only their words have been passed down. As a nobleman, you can use your talents when you have the opportunity; 5 Huang-Lao was a kind of Daoist theory that was popular in the early period of the Western Han dynasty. 6 The Five Classics: Zhou Yi (The Book of Changes), Shang Shu (The Book of Documents), Shi Jing (The Book of Songs), Yi Li (The Book of Rites), and Chun Qiu (The Spring and Autumn Annals). All of these were written before the Qin dynasty (221 B.C.–207 B.C.). 3 ZHOU Jixu, “Confucius and Lao Zi: Their Differing Social Foundations and Cultures” Sino-Platonic Papers, 211 (May 2011) you should be content with being carried along by the tide when you have no opportunity. By saying “you should be content with being carried along by the tide when you have no opportunity (不得其时则蓬累而行),” Lao Zi wanted to persuade Confucius to discard his ideal of a “ritual society” like the one in the Western Zhou dynasty.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Old Master
    INTRODUCTION Four main characteristics distinguish this book from other translations of Laozi. First, the base of my translation is the oldest existing edition of Laozi. It was excavated in 1973 from a tomb located in Mawangdui, the city of Changsha, Hunan Province of China, and is usually referred to as Text A of the Mawangdui Laozi because it is the older of the two texts of Laozi unearthed from it.1 Two facts prove that the text was written before 202 bce, when the first emperor of the Han dynasty began to rule over the entire China: it does not follow the naming taboo of the Han dynasty;2 its handwriting style is close to the seal script that was prevalent in the Qin dynasty (221–206 bce). Second, I have incorporated the recent archaeological discovery of Laozi-related documents, disentombed in 1993 in Jishan District’s tomb complex in the village of Guodian, near the city of Jingmen, Hubei Province of China. These documents include three bundles of bamboo slips written in the Chu script and contain passages related to the extant Laozi.3 Third, I have made extensive use of old commentaries on Laozi to provide the most comprehensive interpretations possible of each passage. Finally, I have examined myriad Chinese classic texts that are closely associated with the formation of Laozi, such as Zhuangzi, Lüshi Chunqiu (Spring and Autumn Annals of Mr. Lü), Han Feizi, and Huainanzi, to understand the intellectual and historical context of Laozi’s ideas. In addition to these characteristics, this book introduces several new interpretations of Laozi.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of Chinese Political Philosophy: Studies in the Composition and Thought of the Shangshu (Classic of Documents)
    饒宗頤國學院院刊 第五期 417 2018 年 5 月 頁 417– 445 Origins of Chinese Political Philosophy: Studies in the Composition and Thought of the Shangshu (Classic of Documents). Edited by Martin KERN and Dirk MEYER. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2017. Pp. vi+508. Edward L. SHAUGHNESSY East Asian Languages and Civilizations, The University of Chicago The publication of a major English-language book on the Shang shu 尚書 (Elevated documents) or Shu jing 書經 (Classic of documents), the second of the Chinese classics, should surely count as a major milestone in the Western study of early China. As the editors note in their Introduction, the Shang shu has inspired all aspects of Chinese political philosophy for over two thousand years now. Yet, as they also say, “In some kind of reverse—and bizarre— Book Reviews correlation, the Shangshu is as important to the Chinese political tradition as it is neglected in Western scholarship” (p. 2). Their claim just above this that “major Western works on the Shangshu can be counted on two hands, with fingers to spare” is only a bit exaggerated.1 In this volume we now have fourteen studies in just over 500 pages, that directly address at least fourteen different chapters of the Shang shu, not to mention two chapters of the 1 True, I count only eight or nine such studies listed in the various bibliographies attached at the end of each chapter, but they do not even include mention of such classic studies as Paul Pelliot, “Le Chou King en caractères anciens et le Chang Chou che wen,” Mémoires concernant l’Asie Orientale 2 (1916): 123–77, or Benjamin Elman, “Philosophy (I-Li) versus Philology (K’ao-cheng): The Jen-hsin tao-hsin Debate,” T’oung Pao 2nd ser.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analects of Confucius
    The analecTs of confucius An Online Teaching Translation 2015 (Version 2.21) R. Eno © 2003, 2012, 2015 Robert Eno This online translation is made freely available for use in not for profit educational settings and for personal use. For other purposes, apart from fair use, copyright is not waived. Open access to this translation is provided, without charge, at http://hdl.handle.net/2022/23420 Also available as open access translations of the Four Books Mencius: An Online Teaching Translation http://hdl.handle.net/2022/23421 Mencius: Translation, Notes, and Commentary http://hdl.handle.net/2022/23423 The Great Learning and The Doctrine of the Mean: An Online Teaching Translation http://hdl.handle.net/2022/23422 The Great Learning and The Doctrine of the Mean: Translation, Notes, and Commentary http://hdl.handle.net/2022/23424 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION i MAPS x BOOK I 1 BOOK II 5 BOOK III 9 BOOK IV 14 BOOK V 18 BOOK VI 24 BOOK VII 30 BOOK VIII 36 BOOK IX 40 BOOK X 46 BOOK XI 52 BOOK XII 59 BOOK XIII 66 BOOK XIV 73 BOOK XV 82 BOOK XVI 89 BOOK XVII 94 BOOK XVIII 100 BOOK XIX 104 BOOK XX 109 Appendix 1: Major Disciples 112 Appendix 2: Glossary 116 Appendix 3: Analysis of Book VIII 122 Appendix 4: Manuscript Evidence 131 About the title page The title page illustration reproduces a leaf from a medieval hand copy of the Analects, dated 890 CE, recovered from an archaeological dig at Dunhuang, in the Western desert regions of China. The manuscript has been determined to be a school boy’s hand copy, complete with errors, and it reproduces not only the text (which appears in large characters), but also an early commentary (small, double-column characters).
    [Show full text]
  • The Rituals of Zhou in East Asian History
    STATECRAFT AND CLASSICAL LEARNING: THE RITUALS OF ZHOU IN EAST ASIAN HISTORY Edited by Benjamin A. Elman and Martin Kern CHAPTER FOUR CENTERING THE REALM: WANG MANG, THE ZHOULI, AND EARLY CHINESE STATECRAFT Michael Puett, Harvard University In this chapter I address a basic problem: why would a text like the Rituals of Zhou (Zhouli !"), which purports to describe the adminis- trative structure of the Western Zhou ! dynasty (ca. 1050–771 BCE), come to be employed by Wang Mang #$ (45 BCE–23 CE) and, later, Wang Anshi #%& (1021–1086) in projects of strong state cen- tralization? Answering this question for the case of Wang Mang, how- ever, is no easy task. In contrast to what we have later for Wang Anshi, there are almost no sources to help us understand precisely how Wang Mang used, appropriated, and presented the Zhouli. We are told in the History of the [Western] Han (Hanshu '() that Wang Mang em- ployed the Zhouli, but we possess no commentaries on the text by ei- ther Wang Mang or one of his associates. In fact, we have no full commentary until Zheng Xuan )* (127–200 CE), who was far re- moved from the events of Wang Mang’s time and was concerned with different issues. Even the statements in the Hanshu about the uses of the Zhouli— referred to as the Offices of Zhou (Zhouguan !+) by Wang Mang— are brief. We are told that Wang Mang changed the ritual system of the time to follow that of the Zhouguan,1 that he used the Zhouguan for the taxation system,2 and that he used the Zhouguan, along with the “The Regulations of the King” (“Wangzhi” #,) chapter of the Records of Ritual (Liji "-), to organize state offices.3 I propose to tackle this problem in a way that is admittedly highly speculative.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Society Networks in China and Vietnam
    INFORMAL PATHBREAKERS: CIVIL SOCIETY NETWORKS IN CHINA AND VIETNAM by ANDREW WELLS-DANG A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Politics & International Studies School of Government and Society University of Birmingham March 2011 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis re-conceptualises civil society as a process of cross-sectoral networking and alliance building among individual activists and organisations. Civil society networks are built on personal connections and develop into flexible, often informal structures that engage in path-breaking advocacy with authorities and elites. In the challenging political contexts of China and Vietnam, civil society networks have brought about significant social change. The findings of extensive fieldwork in both countries demonstrate a wider range of advocacy techniques and strategies than previously documented in one-party authoritarian political systems. Four in-depth qualitative case studies are presented to illustrate a range of network structures, histories and advocacy strategies: the Bright Future Group of people with disabilities (Vietnam), Women’s Network against AIDS (China), the Reunification Park public space network (Vietnam), and the China Rivers Network.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Ethics in Ancient China: a Confucian Perspective
    27 Food Ethics in Ancient China: A Confucian Perspective Chun-chieh HUANG* 1. Introduction Food ethics in ancient China was a complex of ideas that emerged from the Chinese view of life and attitude toward the elderly. They can be seen as the manifestation of the Confucian political ideal of the “kingly way,” and in particular, the related idea of “humane governance.” Food ethics in ancient China was also linked to the everyday practice of eating, especially in the context of rural life. In this paper, I will attempt to parse this thesis, focusing on Mencius’ saying that “those who are seventy can eat meat.” In his conversation with King Hui of Liang (梁惠王, r.319‒301 BCE), Mencius (孟子, 372‒289 BCE) expounded his ideal of the “kingly way” of governance. He stated:1 If the mulberry is planted in every homestead of fi ve mu of land, then those who are fi fty can wear silk; if chickens, pigs and dogs do not miss their breeding season, then those who are seventy can eat meat; if each lot of a hundred mu is not deprived of labour during the busy seasons, then families with several mouths to feed will not go hungry. Exercise due care over the education provided by the village schools, and disci- pline the people by teaching them the duties proper to sons and younger brothers, and those whose heads have turned hoary will not be carrying loads on the roads. When those who are seventy wear silk and eat meat and the masses are neither cold nor hungry, it is impossible for their prince not to be a true King.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Preliminary Discussion of Literary Reform” by Hu Shi
    Primary Source Document with Questions (DBQs) “ A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION OF LITERARY REFORM” By Hu Shi Introduction Beginning around 1917, Chinese intellectuals began to engage each other in serious discussion and debate on culture, history, philosophy, and related subjects — all with an eye to the bigger problem of China’s weakness and the possible solutions to that problem. This period of intellectual debate, labeled the May Fourth Movement, lasted to around 1921. Hu Shi (1891-1962) was one of the leading May Fourth intellectuals. A student of agriculture at Cornell University, and then of philosophy under John Dewey at Columbia University, Hu led the way in the movement to write Chinese in the vernacular, as opposed to the elegant, but (to the average Chinese) incomprehensible classical style. Hu also played a leading role in the cultural debates of the time. The following document represents Hu’s ideas on literary reform. Document Excerpts with Questions (Longer selection follows this section) From Sources of Chinese Tradition: From 1600 Through the Twentieth Century, compiled by Wm. Theodore de Bary and Richard Lufrano, 2nd ed., vol. 2 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2000), 357-360. © 2000 Columbia University Press. Reproduced with the permission of the publisher. All rights reserved. “A Preliminary Discussion of Literary Reform” By Hu Shi I believe that literary reform at the present time must begin with these eight items: (1) Write with substance. (2) Do not imitate the ancients. (3) Emphasize grammar. (4) Reject melancholy. (5) Eliminate old clichés. (6) Do not use allusions. (7) Do not use couplets and parallelisms.
    [Show full text]
  • View Sample Pages
    This Book Is Dedicated to the Memory of John Knoblock 未敗墨子道 雖然歌而非歌哭而非哭樂而非樂 是果類乎 I would not fault the Way of Master Mo. And yet if you sang he condemned singing, if you cried he condemned crying, and if you made music he condemned music. What sort was he after all? —Zhuangzi, “In the World” A publication of the Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley. Although the institute is responsible for the selection and acceptance of manuscripts in this series, responsibility for the opinions expressed and for the accuracy of statements rests with their authors. The China Research Monograph series is one of the several publication series sponsored by the Institute of East Asian Studies in conjunction with its constituent units. The others include the Japan Research Monograph series, the Korea Research Monograph series, and the Research Papers and Policy Studies series. Send correspondence and manuscripts to Katherine Lawn Chouta, Managing Editor Institute of East Asian Studies 2223 Fulton Street, 6th Floor Berkeley, CA 94720-2318 [email protected] Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mo, Di, fl. 400 B.C. [Mozi. English. Selections] Mozi : a study and translation of the ethical and political writings / by John Knoblock and Jeffrey Riegel. pages cm. -- (China research monograph ; 68) English and Chinese. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-55729-103-9 (alk. paper) 1. Mo, Di, fl. 400 B.C. Mozi. I. Knoblock, John, translator, writer of added commentary. II. Riegel, Jeffrey K., 1945- translator, writer of added commentary. III. Title. B128.M79E5 2013 181'.115--dc23 2013001574 Copyright © 2013 by the Regents of the University of California.
    [Show full text]
  • TAO TAO/ Fate in Confucian Virtue Ethics and Its Contemporary
    FATE IN CONFUCIAN VIRTUE ETHICS AND ITS CONTEMPORARY SIGNIFICANCE Tao Tao Abstract：Based on the concept of fate in Confucian virtue ethics, this paper discussed three questions successively: (1) What is inevitable or unchangeable? （2）Facing fate, what we can do？（3）Are we able to achieve happiness？ Or what are the relations between virtues, external goods, and happiness? To the first question, this paper mentioned four aspects: the natural world and its laws, the natural life process, the ethical nature of human beings, and the conventional environment. To the second, this paper analyzed four actions in Confucianism: to understand fate, to go along with fate, to respect fate, and to rejoice in accepting fate. To the third, this paper distinguished two kinds of happiness: one with external goods, the other with virtues, and only the latter one is real and self-sufficient. The final conclusion is that: the gentleman in Confucianism who knows to go along with and respect fate, will accept the arrangement or consequence of actions with tranquility, or even a joyful mind; meanwhile, he will pursue virtues for entire lifetime, because he knows virtues or the Way are a person’s real end or happiness. By nature, or by fate, we are able to or must be moral. Life and death are governed by fate, wealth and honor are determined by Heaven. (Analects 12.5) 1 Undoubtedly, we are all powerless to solve specific problems or change circumstances burdened by unfavorable conditions. Whatever has happened to us has happened; no matter good or bad, we cannot change or ignore it.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Heritage Making in Confucius' Hometown: a Case of The
    Sacred Heritage Making in Confucius’ Hometown: A Case of the Liangguan Site Bailan Qin Department of Chinese Studies School of Languages and Cultures University of Sydney A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy at the University of Sydney ©2018 This is to certify that to the best of my knowledge, the content of this thesis is my own work. This thesis has not been submitted for any degree or other purposes. I certify that the intellectual content of this thesis is the product of my own work and that all the assistance received in preparing this thesis and sources have been acknowledged. Signature Bailan Qin Abstract For over two thousand years, Qufu – the hometown of Confucius – has maintained numerous heritage sites where ancient Chinese elites revered Confucius and studied Confucianism. The sites, known as sacred places, have been exerting significant impact on Chinese culture and society. However, since the early 1930s, many of these sites in non-protected areas have been forgotten and even transformed in such a way that their original heritage meanings have dissipated. Following President Xi Jinping’s visit to Qufu on 26 November 2013, Qufu has been attracting unprecedented attention in both mass media and the academia, contributing to China’s ongoing Confucian revival in the post-Mao era. Against this background, the thesis aims to explore Confucian discourses deeply rooted in traditions of Chinese studies to inform heritage researchers and practioners today of sacred heritage-making process theoretically and practically. The study has investigated how a widely known sacred place – Liangguan was produced, preserved, interpreted and transmitted as heritage by examining historical texts associated with Qufu.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Immunodermatology Xing-Hua Gao • Hong-Duo Chen Editors
    Practical Immunodermatology Xing-Hua Gao • Hong-Duo Chen Editors Practical Immunodermatology Editors Xing-Hua Gao Hong-Duo Chen Dermatology Dermatology The first affiliated Hospital China Medical The first affiliated Hospital China Medical University University Shenyang Shenyang China China ISBN 978-94-024-0900-0 ISBN 978-94-024-0902-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-024-0902-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016960305 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. Printed on acid-free paper This Springer imprint is published by Springer Nature The registered company is Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Original Meaning of the Chinese Character for “Beauty”
    Filozofski vestnik Letnik/Volume XXII • Številka/Number 2 • 2001 • 141-159 THE ORIGINAL MEANING OF THE CHINESE CHARACTER FOR “BEAUTY” J ianping G ao l “Beauty” is translated into Chinese as Џ, (mei) and “Aesthetics” as -^ c ^ (meixue) (literally meaning the studies of the beauty). The compound ( meixue) is new in Chinese and its origin is due to translation in modern time. But indigenous in China is the word mei (beauty), which appearred as early as more than 3000 years ago. The very first question in aesthetics was probably “what is beauty?” The concept of beauty in the mind of ancient Chinese is not necessarily identical with that in the mind of modern people, but an investigation of it may be of some interest to today’s aesthetic inquiry, and, as we shall see, it already attracts attention of some scholars in the fields of both linguistics and aesthetics. “ ЏЈ’ (beauty) is traditionally considered to be composed of two characters: (sheep) and (large). A large sheep will supply plenty of delicious meat. This explanation comes from ShuowenJiezi (100 A.D.), a pioneering book on the research of Chinese characters: Џ. (beauty) means delicious. It is composed of (sheep) and (large). Among six domestic animals (cow, horse, sheep, pig, hen, and dog), sheep are the major sacrificial offerings. Beauty is identical with goodness.1 This opinion was accepted by almost all philologists in ancient China, such as Xu Xuan (917 - 992), Xu Kai (920-974), Duan Yucai (1735 - 1815), Wang Yun (1784 - 1854), and Zhu Junsheng (1788 - 1858), who provided 1 Shuowen Jiezi (literally means “a discription of simply characters and explanation of complex characters”) is a dictionary-like book which was intended to explain Chinese characters on the basis of their forms.
    [Show full text]