DOCSLIB.ORG

MIT by the Numbers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MIT by the Numbers MIT by the Numbers Students MIT Admissions Student Life 2014–2015 UNDERGRADUATE 2014–2015 ͫ 33 varsity sports ͫ 18,356 applicants ͫ 2,700 students participate in 20 intramural sports ͫ 1,447 (7.9%) offered admission ͫ 2,282 students enrolled annually in Music and Theater Arts ͫ 1,043 enrolled (72% yield) ͫ 88% of students participate in UROP ͫ 17% are first-generation college students ͫ 36 Fraternities (25), Sororities (6), and Independent GRADUATE 2014–2015 Living Groups (5) (FSLIG) ͫ 24,468 applicants ͫ >500 student organizations ͫ 3,718 (15%) offered admission ͫ 2,441 enrolled (66% yield) FINANCIAL AID 2013–2014 (except where noted) Women 2014–2015 UNDERGRADUATE ͫ $61,030: total estimated undergraduate student expenses, 2014–2015 46% Female 2,055 ͫ $45,016: tuition and fees, 2014–2015 54% Male 2,457 ͫ 56% of undergraduates awarded need-based GRADUATE financial aid 32% Female 2,171 ͫ $34,551: average scholarship 68% Male 4,636 ͫ 68% of undergraduates work during the academic year ͫ $3,088: average academic-year earnings ͫ $19,064: average student debt, Class of 2014 Student Body Diversity 2014–2015 ͫ 32% of undergraduates come from families UNDERGRADUATE earning ≤ $75,000 White 1,648 ͫ 100%: tuition covered by scholarships for Asian 1,101 families earning ≤ $75,000 Hispanic or Latino 722 International 466 Black or African American 251 Two or more races 235 Student Body 2014–2015 American Indian/Alaskan Native 8 Race/ethnicity unknown 81 Undergraduates 4,512 Total 4,512 40% Graduate students 6,807 GRADUATE 60% Total 11,319 International 2,836 White 2,100 Asian 731 ͫ 50 states plus DC Hispanic or Latino 365 ͫ 116 countries of origin Black or African American 93 Two or more races 180 American Indian/Alaskan Native 10 Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 1 Race/ethnicity unknown 491 Total 6,807 Faculty Finance Nobel Prize Figures in millions 81 present and former members of the MIT community, Operating Expenditures FY2014† including 9 current faculty members: 2007 Susan Solomon P e ace (shared) 44% Sponsored research $1,283.2 2005 Richard R. Schrock Chemistry (shared) 26.6% Instruction/unsponsored research $777.4 2004 Frank Wilczek Physics (shared) 24.4% General and administrative $713.1 2002 Robert H. Horvitz Medicine/Physiology (shared) 4.4% Auxiliary enterprises $129.7 2001 Wolfgang Ketterle Physics (shared) 0.5% Alumni Association $15.2 1997 Robert C. Merton Economic Sciences (shared) 1993 Phillip A. Sharp Medicine/Physiology (shared) Total $2,918.6 1987 Susumu Tonegawa Medicine/Physiology 1976 Samuel C. C. Ting Physics (shared) Operating Revenues FY2014† National Medal of Science 56 present and former members of the MIT community 26.5% Lincoln Laboratory $828.7 including 11 current faculty members: 21.4% Campus $668.6 20.0% Investment return to operations $625.4 2012 Sallie W. Chisholm 2004 Phillip A. Sharp 11.6% $363.4 2011 Rudolf Jaenisch 2001 Ann M. Graybiel Other operations 2010 Susan Lindquist 1999 Susan Solomon 10.4% Tuition, net of discount $324.5 2008 JoAnne Stubbe 1997 Robert A. Weinberg 5.2% Gifts and bequests for operations $162.1 2006 Robert S. Langer 1995 Alexander Rich 3.8% Auxiliary enterprises $120.1 2004 Stephen J. Lippard 1.0% Singapore-MIT Alliance $31.6 Total $3,124.4 Faculty Count 2014–2015 378 Engineering 274 Science Research Expenditures FY2014† 167 Humanities, Arts, & Social Sciences 113 Sloan School of Management 78 Architecture & Planning Campus $678.4 45% 11 Other Lincoln Laboratory $811.3 53% Singapore-MIT Alliance 1,021 Total for Research & Technology $31.6 2% 3% US Minority Groups 2014–2015 Total $1,521.3 ͫ 20% of faculty are members of a minority group ͫ 7% are members of an underrepresented minority* † ͫ American Indian or Alaskan Native:2 MIT Campus Research Sponsorship FY2014 ͫ African American: 33 18% Department of Defense $122.7 ͫ Hispanic: 39 17% Health and Human Services $115.0 ͫ Asian: 132 17% Industry $112.3 *Some faculty members identify as part of multiple groups. 13% Department of Energy $88.4 12% National Science Foundation $78.9 11% Non-Profits $72.1 For More Information 4% State, Local and Foreign Govts $28.9 David Woodruff 5% NASA $32.0 Associate Vice President and COO Resource Development 3% Other Federal $17.6 [email protected] | 617.253.3990 1% Internal $10.0 web.mit.edu/facts Total $677.9 01477/0315 †Percentages may not total due to rounding. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Michael S. Brown, MD
    DISTINGUISHED PHYSICIANS AND Michael S. Brown, M.D. Sir Richard Roberts, Ph.D. Winner, 1985 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Winner, 1993 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine MEDICAL SCIENTISTS MENTORING Winner, 1988 Presidential National Medal of Science A globally prominent biochemist and molecular biologist, DELEGATES HAVE INCLUDED... Dr. Brown received the world’s most prestigious medical Dr. Roberts was awarded the Nobel Prize for his prize for his work describing the regulation of the groundbreaking contribution to discovering RNA splicing. cholesterol metabolism. His work laid the foundation for Dr. Roberts is dedicating his future research to GMO crops the class of drugs now called statins taken daily by more than 20 million and food sources, and demonstrating the effect they have on humanity. — GRANDg MASTERS — people worldwide. Ferid Murad, M.D., Ph.D. Mario Capecchi, Ph.D. Boris D. Lushniak, M.D., M.P.H Winner, 1998 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Academy Science Director The Surgeon General of the United States (acting, 2013-2014) Winner, 2007 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine A world-renowned pioneer in biochemistry, Dr. Murad’s Winner, 2001 National Medal of Science Rear Admiral Lushniak, M.D., M.P.H., was the United award-winning research demonstrated that nitroglycerin Winner, 2001 Lasker Award States’ leading spokesperson on matters of public health, and related drugs help patients with heart conditions by Winner, 2003 Wolf Prize in Medicine overseeing the operations of the U.S. Public Health Service releasing nitric oxide into the body, thus relaxing smooth Mario Capecchi, Ph.D., a biophysicist, is a Distinguished Commissioned Corps, which consists of approximately muscles by elevating intracellular cyclic GMP, leading to vasodilation and Professor of Human Genetics at the University of Utah School of Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Rich (1924–2015) Biologist Who Discovered Ribosome Clusters and ‘Left-Handed’ DNA
    OBITUARY COMMENT Alexander Rich (1924–2015) Biologist who discovered ribosome clusters and ‘left-handed’ DNA. first came across Alexander Rich worked out the structure of Rich in 1963. He was on the a Z-DNA fragment bound to an cover of that year’s 13 May issue RNA-editing enzyme. He and his Iof Newsweek with his PhD student colleagues also showed how the JOSIAH D. RICH Jonathan Warner. The two of them pathogenicity of the vaccinia virus, had just discovered clusters of ribo- and probably of the smallpox virus, somes called polysomes — crucial correlated with a virus-specific pro- components involved in the build- tein binding to the host’s Z-DNA. ing of proteins. Rich’s interest in the latest Rich, who died on 27 April, was discoveries across diverse disciplines born in 1924 in Hartford, Connecticut was irrepressible. During the 1970s, to immigrant parents from Russia and he worked as an adviser for NASA, Eastern Europe. He grew up during weighing in on projects exploring the Great Depression in Springfield, the possible existence of life on Mars. Massachusetts, attending a technical He also ventured into biotechnology secondary school by day, and work- and co-founded three companies: ing nights at a local rifle factory. At Repligen, Alkermes, and in his 80s, one point, his family went to live at a 3-D Matrix. local YMCA club after being evicted Rich received numerous honorary from their home. Against the odds, degrees and awards, including the US Rich made it to Harvard University National Medal of Science, presented in Cambridge, Massachusetts, grad- to him in 1995 by then US President uating with a bachelor’s degree in Bill Clinton.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular and Cellular Biology Volume 4 - December 1984 C Number 12
    MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY VOLUME 4 - DECEMBER 1984 C NUMBER 12 Aaron J. Shatkin, Editor in Chief(1985) Louis Siminovitch, Editor (1985) Roche Institute of Molecular Biology Hospital for Sick Children Nutley, N.J. Toronto, Canada Harvey F. Lodish, Editor (1986) Paul S. Sypherd, Editor (1985) Whitehead Institute for Biomedical University of California Research Irvine, Calif. Cambridge, Mass. Harold E. Varmus, Editor (1989) David J. L. Luck, Editor (1987) University of California Rockefeller University San Francisco New York, N.Y. EDITORIAL BOARD Renato Baserga (1985) Ari Helenius (1984) Steven McKnight (1986) Milton J. Schlesinger (1986) Alan Bernstein (1984) Susan A. Henry (1985) Robert L. Metzenberg (1985) Phillip A. Sharp (1985) J. Michael Bishop (1984) Ira Herskowitz (1984) Robert K. Mortimer (1985) Fred Sherman (1985) Joan Brugge (1985) James B. Hicks (1986) Paul Neiman (1986) Anna Marie Skalka (1986) Breck Byers (1985) John A. Carbon (1984) Tony Hunter (1986) Harvey L. Ozer (1985) Pamela Stanley (1985) Lawrence A. Chasin (1985) Larry Kedes (1985) Mary Lou Pardue (1985) Joan A. Steitz (1985) Nam-Hai Chua (1985) Barbara Knowles (1986) Mark Pearson (1985) James L. Van Etten (1985) Terrance G. Cooper (1984) Marilyn Kozak (1985) Jeremy Pickett-Heaps (1985) Jonathan R. Warner (1984) James E. Darnell, Jr. (1985) Monty Krieger (1986) Robert E. Pollack (1985) Robert A. Weinberg (1984) Gary Felsenfeld (1985) Elias Lazarides (1985) Keith R. Porter (1985) I. Bernard Weinstein (1985) Norton B. Gilula (1985) John B. Little (1985) John R. Pringle (1985) Harold Weintraub (1985) James E. Haber (1984) William F. Loomis, Jr. (1985) Daniel B. Rifkin (1985) Reed B.
    [Show full text]
  • Primer Requirement and Template Specificity of the DNA Polymerase of RNA Tumor Viruses (Avian Myeloblastosis Virus/Mouse Leukemia Virus/E
    Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 68, No. 7, pp. 1507-1511, July 1971 Primer Requirement and Template Specificity of the DNA Polymerase of RNA Tumor Viruses (avian myeloblastosis virus/mouse leukemia virus/E. coli DNA polymerase/ homopolynucleotides/oligonucleotides) DAVID BALTIMORE AND DONNA SMOLER Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. 02139 Communicated by Alexander Rich, April 26, 1971 ABSTRACT Polyribonucleotides will act as efficient way, to prefer polyribonucleotides to polydeoxvribonucleo- templates for the DNA polymerases found in the virions of tides as templates. avian myeloblastosis virus and mouse leukemia virus if a short complementary oligodeoxyribonucleotide primer is MATERIALS AND METHODS added. Synthesis of the complementary polydeoxyribo- nucleotide continues until an amount of polymer equal to Polyribonucleotides were obtained from Miles Laboratories, the amount of initial template has been produced. The Elkhart, Ind.; their concentrations were determined from two viruses show slightly different specificities toward the the extinction coefficients provided by the manufacturer. four homoribopolymers. Polydeoxyribonucleotides are Dr. F. generally much poorer templates than the homologous Polydeoxyribonucleotides were a kind gift of Bollum; polyribonucleotides, in most cases yielding no detectable their concentrations were determined from extinction co- synthesis. The DNA polymerases of RNA tumor viruses, efficients provided by Dr. Bollum. The oligodeoxyribonucleo- therefore, have the same requirements for activity as do tides were a product of Collaborative Research, Waltham, other DNA polymerases, except that they prefer polyribo- Mass., and had chain lengths of 12-16 units (which are indi- nucleotides over polydeoxyribonucleotides as templates. cated as 14 in the text); their concentrations were determined Virions of the RNA tumor viruses contain a DNA polymerase from the extinction coefficients of the respective polydeoxy- (1, 2) which, in the absence of added nucleic acid, synthesizes ribonucleotides.
    [Show full text]
  • NAM 2020 Annual Meeting Donor Listing Consolidated Final Version
    2019 Honor Roll of Donors We gratefully acknowledge the following members and friends who have made generous charitable lifetime contributions. Their collective, private philanthropy enhances the impact of the Academies as advisor to the nation on matters of science, engineering, and medicine. Recently, three new giving societies were introduced, recognizing donors at $250,000 and above. Boldfaced names are NAM members. The Lincoln Society In recognition of members and friends who have made lifetime contributions of $1,000,000 or more to the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, or National Academy of Medicine. Bruce and Betty Alberts Irwin and Joan Jacobs Richard L. and Hinda G. Richard and Rita Atkinson Robert L. and Anne K. Rosenthal* Norman R. Augustine James Martine A. Rothblatt Craig and Barbara Barrett Kenneth A. Jonsson* Jack W. and Valerie Rowe Jordan* and Rhoda Baruch Fred Kavli* Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ Stephen D. Bechtel, Jr. Daniel E. Koshland, Jr.* Prize Fund of the Russ Arnold and Mabel Tillie K. Lubin* College of Engineering Beckman* Whitney* and Betty and Technology at Ohio Leonard Blavatnik MacMillan University Harry E. Bovay, Jr.* John F. McDonnell Dame Jillian Sackler Donald L. Bren George P. Mitchell* Raymond* and Beverly Harvey V. Fineberg and The Ambrose Monell Sackler Mary E. Wilson Foundation Bernard and Rhoda Sarnat* Bernard M. Gordon Gordon and Betty Moore Leonard D. Schaeffer Cecil H. Green* Philip and Sima Sara Lee and Axel Schupf Michael and Sheila Held* Needleman James H. and Marilyn William R. and Rosemary B. Peter O’Donnell, Jr. Simons Hewlett* Robert* and Mayari Pritzker John and Janet Swanson Ming and Eva Hsieh Listed below are individuals who became members of the Lincoln Society between January 1 and October 7, 2020: Marci and James J.
    [Show full text]
  • History 598, Fall 2004
    Meeting Time: The seminar will meet Tuesday afternoons, 1:30-4:30, in Dickinson 211 Week I (9/14) Introduction: Jeremy Campbell, Grammatical Man Evelyn Fox Keller, Refiguring Life: Metaphors of Twentieth-Century Biology Questions and Themes Secondary Lily E. Kay, "Cybernetics, Information, Life: The Emergence of Scriptural Representations of Heredity", Configurations 5(1997), 23-91 [PU online]; and "Who Wrote the Book of Life? Information and the Transformation of Molecular Biology," Week II (9/21) Science in Context 8 (1995): 609-34. Michael S. Mahoney, "Cybernetics and Information Technology," in Companion to the The Discursive History of Modern Science, ed. R. C. Olby et al., Chap.34 [online] Rupture Karl L. Wildes and Nilo A. Lindgren, A Century of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at MIT, 1882-1982, Parts III and IV (cf. treatment of some of the Report: Philipp v. same developments in David Mindell, Between Humans and Machines) Hilgers James Phinney Baxter, Scientists Against Time Supplementary John M.Ellis, Against Deconstruction (Princeton, 1989), Chaps. 2-3 Daniel Chandler, "Semiotics for Beginners" Primary [read for overall structure before digging in to the extent you can] Week III (9/28) Warren S. McCulloch and Walter Pitts, "A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity", Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5(1943), 115-33; repr. in Machines and Warren S. McCulloch, Embodiments of Mind (MIT, 1965), 19-39, and in Margaret A. Nervous Systems Boden (ed.), The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence (Oxford, 1990), 22-39. Alan M. Turing, "On Computable Numbers, with an Application to Report: Perrin the Entscheidungsproblem", Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, ser.
    [Show full text]
  • Investing in UK Health and Life Sciences
    Office for Life Sciences Office for Life Sciences Investing in UK Health and Life Sciences Printed in the UK on recycled paper containing a minimum of 75% post consumer waste. iv Department for Business, Innovation and Skills. www.bis.gov.uk i First published December 2011. © Crown copyright. BIS/Pub/1.0k/12/11.NP. URN 11/1428 Making the UK a world leading place for life sciences innovation Life science – and the UK’s role in it – is at a crossroads. Behind us lies a great history of discovery, from the unravelling of DNA to MRI scanning and genetic sequencing. We can be proud of our past, but this government is acutely aware that we cannot be complacent about the future. Your industry is undergoing profound change. The financial crisis is affecting healthcare budgets in the West, many blockbuster drugs are nearing the end of their patents, and new biological insights have dramatically altered the landscape of discovery and development. As a result of increasing R&D costs, the old ‘big pharma’ model is becoming more difficult to maintain. In its place is a new focus on translational medicine – more early stage clinical trails with patients, more external innovation, more collaboration. We understand that the game has changed – and that the UK must change with it. This country has all the ingredients to be an outstanding location for medical innovation: an integrated National Health Service, unlike any other; a highly competitive tax and investment framework; and an unrivalled science base, with four of the world’s top ten universities here in Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 and All That: a Tale of a Third Science
    Karola Stotz: 2001 and all that, draft, 11/24/06 1 2001 and all that: a tale of a third science Karola Stotz Draft, do not cite without permission Word count: w/o references and figures 9,620, total: 12,043 “Last year (2001) will be identified in the history of biology by the publication of the first draft of the complete sequence of the human genome”(Collado-Vides and Hofestaedt 2002, vii) (Collado-Vides and Hofestaedt 2002, vii). “The more we lift the lid on the human genome, the more vulnerable to experience genes appear to be” (Ridley 2003). 1. Introduction In '1953 and all that', one of the seminal papers on the relationship between classical and molecular genetics, Philip Kitcher argued that while molecular genetics has solved the major questions of replication, mutation and the action of genes these celebrated achievements do not fall into either of the traditional categories of theory reduction and explanatory extension (Kitcher 1984). The classical and molecular conceptions of the gene both remain valid. For the last 15 years C. Kenneth Waters has argued relentlessly against the antireductionist consensus that Kitcher helped create (Waters 1990, 1994, 2000, forthcoming a, forthcoming b). According to Waters the molecular gene concept “unifies our understanding of the molecular basis of a wide variety of phenomena, including the phenomena that classical genetics explains in terms of gene differences causing phenotypic differences” (Waters 1994, 163). He identifies the privileged role of the molecular gene in many biological explanations as that of an “actual difference maker” with “causal specificity” (Waters forthcoming b).
    [Show full text]
  • NAM Annual Report 2019
    2019 Annual Report CONTENTS Special Insert: Responding to the COVID-19 Pandemic 3 Letter from the President 5 2019–2020 Governing Council 7 Organizational Chart 8 The IOM/NAM 50th Anniversary Celebration 9 Program Highlights 10 Responding to Critical & Pressing Issues Confronting the U.S. Opioid Epidemic, 11 Promoting Clinician Well-Being & Resilience, 13 Human Germline Genome Editing, 15 Climate Change & Human Health, 16 Advising the Nation & the World on Health & Health Care Advancing Health Equity, 17 Artificial Intelligence in Health Care, 19 Understanding Heterogeneous Treatment Effects, 20 Vital Directions in Health & Health Care, 21 The Future of Nursing, 22 Leading & Inspiring for the Future Healthy Longevity Global Grand Challenge, 23 Committee on Emerging Science, Technology, & Innovation, 25 Member Highlights 26 Inaugural Election of NAM Officers, 27 Members Inducted in 2019 (Class of 2018), 28 Members Elected in 2019 (Class of 2019), 30 2019 Nobel Laureates, 33 2019 Annual Meeting, 34 In Memoriam, 36 Fellowships & Leadership Programs 37 Awards 42 Finances 47 Donor Appreciation 48 Contact Us 65 2 SPECIAL INSERT Responding to the COVID-19 Pandemic As this document entered its final stages of production, coronavirus disease (COVID-19) began to spread around the world—quickly becoming the most destructive pandemic in a century. The National Academy of Medicine quickly initiated a short-term reorientation of its existing programs to respond to the diverse and far-reaching health impacts of the pandemic, including in the areas of equity, workforce, aging, vulnerable populations, health system strengthening, and scientific and technological innovation. An “impact map” that guides the NAM’s role and priorities with regard to the COVID-19 response appears below.
    [Show full text]
  • Coding Sequences: a History of Sequence Comparison Algorithms As a Scientiªc Instrument
    Coding Sequences: A History of Sequence Comparison Algorithms as a Scientiªc Instrument Hallam Stevens Harvard University Sequence comparison algorithms are sophisticated pieces of software that com- pare and match identical or similar regions of DNA, RNA, or protein se- quence. This paper examines the origins and development of these algorithms from the 1960s to the 1990s. By treating this software as a kind of scien- tiªc instrument used to examine sets of biological objects, the paper shows how algorithms have been used as different sorts of tools and appropriated for dif- ferent sorts of uses according to the disciplinary context in which they were deployed. These particular uses have made sequences themselves into different kinds of objects. Introduction Historians of molecular biology have paid signiªcant attention to the role of scientiªc instruments and their relationship to the production of bio- logical knowledge. For instance, Lily Kay has examined the history of electrophoresis, Boelie Elzen has analyzed the development of the ultra- centrifuge as an enabling technology for molecular biology, and Nicolas Rasmussen has examined how molecular biology was transformed by the introduction of the electron microscope (Kay 1998, 1993; Elzen 1986; Rasmussen 1997).1 Collectively, these historians have demonstrated how instruments and other elements of the material culture of the labora- tory have played a decisive role in determining the kind and quantity of knowledge that is produced by biologists. During the 1960s, a versatile new kind of instrument began to be deployed in biology: the electronic computer (Ceruzzi 2001; Lenoir 1999). Despite the signiªcant role that 1. One could also point to Robert Kohler’s (1994) work on the fruit ºy, Jean-Paul Gaudillière (2001) on laboratory mice, and Hannah Landecker (2007) on the technologies of tissue culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Vmcp\D HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER DEPARTMENT of BIOPHYSICS and PHYSIOLOGY 3223 NORTH BROAD STREET PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19140
    a - FILE TEMPLE UNIVERSITY vmcp\d HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER DEPARTMENT OF BIOPHYSICS AND PHYSIOLOGY 3223 NORTH BROAD STREET PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19140 DIVISION OF BIOPHYSICS Dr. E. Feigenbaum Dept. Computer Science Stanford University Stanford, California Dear Doctor Feigenbaum: On behalf of the International Scientific Committee thanks for accepting to participate at the Nobel and Galileian celebration to take place May 5-10 in San Remo and Rome. The final scientific programs for both San Remo and Rome, with the specific indication (topic and time) of your contribution, are included. They have already gone to press, and as such, you should receive a copy in due time of the entire . program! As per previous correspondence, the closing ceremony for the Nobel celebration will take place on Saturday, May 7th in San Remo at the presence of the King of Sweden and the President of . the Italian Republic . While the opening ceremony for Galileo Galilei celebration will take place Monday morning, May 9th in Rome, at the Vatican, with the presence of Pope John Paul II and the President Pertini of the Italian Republic. time, but if^you should need any further assistance, please contact Mrs. Deramo in Rome at 06-6799973 (direct line to the INFN-Pres- Looking forward to being with you at San Remo and Rome for these historic events, I remain. Sincerely yours , >A^ , _*» Claudio Nicolini Professor and Director PS Until March 31 you may contact me at 215-221-4969, after that i will be in Europe until May (39-10-572925). \ VILLA NOBEL May 5-6 1983 (SAN REMO) SYMPOSIUM FOR THE 150th ANNIVERSARY OF ALFRED NOBEL BIRTH NEW FRONTIERS AT THE CROSSING OF LIFE AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES Chairman: C.
    [Show full text]
  • Download a Drug-Discovery Software Vitamins B6 and B12, Can Protect You from Cancer
    MISSION>> The National Foundation for Cancer Research (NFCR) was founded in 1973 to support cancer research in the laboratory. NFCR research conducted at both the cellular and molecular Table of levels is leading to better prevention, earlier diagnosis, new Contents>> President's Message ..........1 treatments, and eventually a cure for cancer. By supporting the SOLVING THE MYSTERIES OF CANCER NFCR Highlights ............ 2 best ideas of the best minds and by facilitating collaboration Selected Honors & Awards ......4 LABORATORY WITHOUT WALLS among NFCR Project Directors, advances in one field NFCR Research Centers .......6 RESEARCH FOR A CURE contribute to discoveries in another. This is what NFCR's NFCR Fellows .............10 REALIZING THE MISSION "Laboratory Without Walls" makes possible. New NFCR Project Directors ....16 Project Directors of N FCR ..... 19 PROGRESS THROUGH PARTNERSHIP Gene Forum ............... 22 NFCR & AACR ............. 25 FUNDING FOR A CURE NFCR's Chairman's Circle ..... 27 Giving to NFCR ............32 2000 Financials ............34 NFCR AND YOU Public Education ...........3 6 President's Message AT NFCR WE ARE EXCITED about the new Since we rely on your support and the As you review NFCR's 2000 Annual era in cancer research. We realize that support of ochers like you for every Report, keep in mind that your contin­ coping with cancer remains the most dollar of our research funding, NFCR is ued dedication to finding a cancer cure difficult problem many Americans will grateful for what you helped us achieve has provided the backbone for all of ever face.At NFCR, we draw our inspi­ this year.Your gifts provided funding to our research programs.
    [Show full text]