3-18-2017 Snapshots of a Life in Science, Jeremy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

3-18-2017 Snapshots of a Life in Science, Jeremy Snapshots of a life in science: letters, essays, biographical notes, and other writings (1990-2016) Jeremy Nathans Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics Department of Neuroscience Department of Ophthalmology Johns Hopkins Medical School Howard Hughes Medical Institute Baltimore, Maryland USA Contents Preface………………………………………………………………………………………………6 Introductions for Lectures or Prizes…………………………..…………..………………………...7 Lubert Stryer, on the occasion of a symposium in his honor – October 2003 Seymour Benzer, 2001 Passano Awardee – April 2001 Alexander Rich, 2002 Passano Awardee – April 2002 Mario Capecchi, 2004 Daniel Nathans Lecturer – May 2004 Rich Roberts, 2006 Daniel Nathans Lecturer – January 2006 Napoleone Ferrara, 2006 Passano Awardee – April 2006 Tom Sudhof, 2008 Passano Awardee – April 2008 Irv Weissman, 2009 Passano Awardee – April 2009 Comments at the McGovern Institute (MIT) regarding Ed Scolnick and Merck - April 2009 David Julius, 2010 Passano Awardee – April 2010 Introduction to the 2013 Lasker Clinical Prize Winners – September 2013 Helen Hobbs and Jonathan Cohen, 2016 Passano Awardees – April 2016 About Other Scientists………………………………………………………………………….…22 David Hogness, scientist and mentor – October 2007 John Mollon – November 1997 Lubert Stryer - October 2006 Hope Jahren – July 2007 Letter to Roger Kornberg about his father, Arthur Kornberg – February 2008 Peter Kim – June 2013 Eulogies………………………………………………………………………………………...…28 Letter from Arthur Kornberg – November 1999 Daniel Nathans (1928-1999; family memorial service) – November 1999 Nupur Thekdi (1977-2001; Johns Hopkins memorial service) - March 2001 Robert Nathans (1927-2010; family memorial service) – June 2010 Howard Hughes Medical Institute……………….……………………………………………..…31 Letter to David Clayton – November 2005 Comments on the Janelia Research Campus – November 2009 Letter to the HHMI International Early Career Scientist competition team – October 2011 Letter to Jack Dixon requesting additional funds – May 2012 Comments on the Drosophila Olympiad Project at the Janelia Research Campus – June 2012 Johns Hopkins……………………………………………………………………………………..35 Comments on the inauguration of the Daniel Nathans Professorship – December 2003 2 Letter to Joe Coppola regarding the Johns Hopkins response to property crimes – May 2005 Open letter to Johns Hopkins Medical School faculty – April 2006 Letter to Chi Dang regarding core laboratory assessments - January 2009 Letter to Ed Miller and Lloyd Minor regarding support for Carol Greider – October 2009 Thank you to a Johns Hopkins security officer – October 2009 Letter regarding speakers at the Brain Sciences Institute symposium - July 2010 Letter to Ed Miller and Janice Clements regarding support for Carol Greider – September 2010 Letter to Carol Greider regarding downsizing glassware washers in MBG – January 2011 Letter to Sin Urban and Carolyn Machamer regarding graduate admissions – December 2011 Letter to Paul Rothman regarding a proposal to advertise on the JHMI web site – November 2012 Letter to Ron Daniels and Jonathan Bagger regarding Bloomberg Professors – March 2013 Letter to Paul Rothman regarding the Brain Sciences Institute – November 2013 Letter to Hamilton Smith regarding an award in his name – January 2014 Letter to Carol Greider regarding departmental reviews – February 2014 Letter to Steve Desiderio regarding a new Bloomberg Professor – April 2014 Letter to Carol Greider regarding financial transparency at Johns Hopkins – October 2014 Letter from a first year medical student – December 2014 Letter to Steve Desiderio regarding financial transparency at Johns Hopkins – February 2015 Letter to Paul Worley and Shan Sockanathan – March 2015 Letter to Steve Desiderio regarding the distribution of endowed professorships – April 2015 Letters regarding microscope thefts – September 2014 – April 2015 Trying to Move Mountains……………………………………………………………………..….55 Problems with the International Office at Johns Hopkins Medical School – July 1991 Design and construction – November 2015 Fighting the plague of Material Transfer Agreements – November 2015 – September 2016 Unsuccessfully requesting published materials – October 2015 to February 2016 Correspondence with the Johns Hopkins finance office – February 2014 to December 2016 Support for Science and Scientists, Especially Young Scientists…………………………………73 Letter to Michael Bloomberg regarding support for young scientists – August 2013 Letter to Art Levinson regarding the Breakthrough Prize – September 2013 Advice for Students and Colleagues………………………………………………………...…….76 Notes on First Year Medical Student Teaching for the Curriculum Committee – December 2003 Wilmer Research Meeting – July 2004 Advice for a biomedical engineering graduate student - October 2005 Johns Hopkins Medical School White Coat Ceremony – May 2006 Advice for a biomedical engineering graduate student - December 2006 Job interview advice for the teenage son of a member of the housekeeping staff – December 2006 Notes on teaching – August 2007 Letter to Sin Urban – August 2008 Science Integrity – October 2008 Correcting errors in the lab – September 2009 Advice for young scientists – May 2011 JHMI Dean’s Lecture on mentoring – September 2012 Letter to Hao Wu – August 2014 3 Letter to Chris Potter – January 2015 Commencement Remarks, Biology Department, JHU – May 2015 Letter to Lucas Hua – September 2015 Letter to a student who was not accepted at Johns Hopkins for graduate school – March 2010 Publishing, Apportioning Credit, and Other Scientific Sociology Issues…………………..……101 Letter to Al Lazen, National Research Council – April 1997 Letter to Robert Simoni (Editor, Journal of Biological Chemistry) – November 2003 Letter to Nick Cozzarelli (Editor-in Chief) and Diane Sullenberger (Managing Editor) (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) – June 2005 Letters to Peter Lawrence and Makoto Kuro regarding scientific credit – November 2008 Letter to the editors of Cell regarding our manuscript – January 2009 Letter to Sol Snyder (Editor, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences) - April 2010 Letter to King-wai Yau – June 2011 Letter to Susan Wessler (National Academy of Sciences Home Secretary) - March 2013 Letter to Science regarding Chinese Academy of Sciences – April 2013 Letter to Thomas Walchli – July 2015 Letter to Richard Nakamura regarding grant review issues at NINDS – December 2015 Letters to the Editor……………………………………………………………………………...114 Letter to The Virginian Pilot – June 2004 Letter to Johns Hopkins Medical News – January 2006 Letter to Science: “Written in Our Genes?” – June 2005 Letter to the Baltimore Sun regarding ground rent – December 2006 Letter to Science regarding China’s One Child Policy – December 2010 Letter to Johns Hopkins Magazine editors regarding Syria – June 2011 Letter to The New York Times regarding population and resources - April 2014 Letter to The New Yorker regarding Egypt – December 2016 Letter to Science regarding recessive disease – December 2016 Miscellaneous Letters……………………………………………………………………………121 Letter to Roel Nusse – June 1995 Letter to Semir Zeki – May 1996 Letter to Elizabeth Turner – February 1998 Letter to Sandra Wighton, Baltimore City Schools Assistant Superintendent – June 1998 Letter to Leon Kass - March 2005 Letter to Ralph Cicerone (President of the National Academy of Sciences) regarding a manned mission to Mars – September 2005 Letter to Lisa Thomas – September 2005 Letter to Ben Barres – October 2005 Letter to Dean Bok – July 2006 Letter to the Foundation Fighting Blindness regarding donors and research subjects – April 2010 Letter to Wenlan Wang – April 2011 Letter from a Korean engineer regarding curly hair – May 2011 Letter to Henry Bourne – November 2013 Letter to Jerry Crabtree – August 2014 Letter to Wayne Hendrickson – October 2014 Letter to Richard Mains – October 2015 4 Letter to Vanitha Ramakrishnan – November 2016 Politics and Society…………………………………………………………………………..….138 Letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation – September 2001 Islamic Terrorism and the West – October 2001 Letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation – October 2004 Letter to the Obama campaign – August 2008 JN’s philosophy on investing in the wake of the 2008 financial meltdown – January 2009 Letter to Bill Foster after his congressional defeat – November 2010 Letter to President Obama regarding gay marriage – May 2012 Letter to Jimmy Carter about how Jews are treated in Arab countries – December 2012 The Physics of Extremism – December 2015 Climate Change……………………………………………………………………………….…148 Letter to Graeme Davis (University of California, San Francisco) - April 2010 Letter to Menqing Xiang (Rutgers University) – September 2015 Letter to Martin Stratmann (President, Max Planck Society) – November 2015 Letter to the senior leadership of the Society for Neuroscience – January 2016 Editorial correspondence with Science magazine – November and December 2016 Essay in eLife (co-authored with Peter Sterling) – March 2016 Autobiographical items………………………………………………………………………..…157 Recollections of my time with David Hogness – September 2007 Comments at a reception for the Champalimaud Award at Johns Hopkins – October 2008 Comments at Stanford Medical School – May 2013 Comments on the inauguration of the Samuel Theobald Professorship – June 2013 Transcripts of Lectures………………………..…………………………………………………162 Presentation to the Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions Board of Trustees – March 2002 The Vertebrate Retina (iBioSeminars video transcripts) – August 2008 One Amazing
Recommended publications
  • Chun Li Bai Prof. BAI Chunli, a Chemist and An
    Chun Li Bai Chinese Academy of Sciences President Prof. BAI Chunli, a chemist and an expert in nanoscience, is President of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), and Chairman of the Presidium of the Academic Divisions of CAS. He is also President of The World Academy of Sciences for the advancement of science in developing countries (TWAS), the Honorary President of the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), and the Honorary President of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS). Prof. BAI graduated from the Department of Chemistry, Peking University in 1978 and received his M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees from CAS Institute of Chemistry in 1981 and 1985, respectively. From 1985 to 1987, he worked at California Institute of Technology in US as a visiting scholar. After coming back to China in 1987, he continued his research at CAS Institute of Chemistry. From 1991 to 1992, he worked as a visiting professor at Tohoku University in Japan. In 1996, he was appointed as Vice President of CAS ; in 2004, he was appointed as Executive Vice President of CAS (full ministerial level). Prof. BAI’s research areas include organic molecular crystal structure, EXAFS, molecular nanostructure, and scanning tunneling microscopy. He has been elected member or foreign member of world-known academies of sciences or engineering in approximately 20 countries and territories, including CAS, TWAS, National Academy of Sciences of US, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the Royal Society of UK, the European Academy of Sciences, and the Russian Academy of Sciences. He also serves as the Honorary President of the Chinese Society of Micro-Nano Technology, the Chief Scientist for the National Steering Committee for Nanoscience and Technology, Vice Chairman of Academic Degrees Committee of the State Council, Vice Chairman of the National Committee for Science & Technology Awards, member of the Central Leading Group for Education, and member of the National Leading Group for Science and Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Cone Monochromacy: Visual Function and Efficacy Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Blue Cone Monochromacy: Visual Function and Efficacy Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials Xunda Luo1☯‡, Artur V. Cideciyan1☯‡*, Alessandro Iannaccone2, Alejandro J. Roman1, Lauren C. Ditta2, Barbara J. Jennings2, Svetlana A. Yatsenko3, Rebecca Sheplock1, Alexander Sumaroka1, Malgorzata Swider1, Sharon B. Schwartz1, Bernd Wissinger4, Susanne Kohl4, Samuel G. Jacobson1* 1 Scheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America, 2 Hamilton Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America, 3 Pittsburgh Cytogenetics Laboratory, Center for Medical Genetics and Genomics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America, 4 Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. ‡ OPEN ACCESS These authors are joint first authors on this work. * [email protected] (SGJ); [email protected] (AVC) Citation: Luo X, Cideciyan AV, Iannaccone A, Roman AJ, Ditta LC, Jennings BJ, et al. (2015) Blue Cone Monochromacy: Visual Function and Efficacy Abstract Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0125700. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125700 Academic Editor: Dror Sharon, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, ISRAEL Background Blue Cone Monochromacy (BCM) is an X-linked retinopathy caused by mutations in the Received: December 29, 2014 OPN1LW / OPN1MW gene cluster, encoding long (L)- and middle (M)-wavelength sensitive Accepted: March 21, 2015 cone opsins. Recent evidence shows sufficient structural integrity of cone photoreceptors in Published: April 24, 2015 BCM to warrant consideration of a gene therapy approach to the disease.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPERIMENT: a Manifesto of Young England, 1928- 1931 Two Volumes
    EXPERIMENT: A Manifesto of Young England, 1928- 1931 Two Volumes Vol. 2 of 2 Kirstin L. Donaldson PhD University of York History of Art September 2014 Table of Conents Volume Two Appendix: Full Transcript of Experiment Experiment 1 (November 1928) 261 Experiment 2 (February 1929) 310 Experiment 3 (May 1929) 358 Experiment 4 (November 1929) 406 Experiment 5 (February 1930) 453 Experiment 6 (October 1930) 501 Experiment 7 (Spring 1931) 551 260 EXPERIMENT We are concerned with all the intellectual interests of undergraduates. We do not confine ourselves to the work of English students, nor are we at pains to be littered with the Illustrious Dead and Dying. Our claim has been one of uncompromising independence: therefore not a line in these pages has been written by any but degreeless students or young graduates. It has been our object to gather all and none but the not yet ripe fruits of art, science and philosophy in the university. We did not wish so much that our articles should be sober and guarded as that they should be stimulating and lively and take up a strong line. We were prepared in fact to give ourselves away. But we know that Cambridge is painfully well-balanced just now (a sign, perhaps of anxiety neurosis) and so we were prepared also to find, as the reader will find, rather too guarded and sensible a daring. Perhaps we will ripen into extravagance. Contributions for the second number should be send to W. Empson of Magdalene College. We five are acting on behalf of the contributors, who have entrusted us with this part of the work.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Agenda Council Reports 2010 Gl Global Agenda Council O
    Global Agenda Council Reports 2010 Global Agenda Council 2010 Reports Global Agenda Council Reports 2010 .weforum.org) ofit; it is tied to no political, no to tied is it ofit; -pr national organization committed to improving the improving committed to organization national The World Economic Forum is an independent an is Forum Economic World The inter partnerships in leaders engaging by world the of state and industry agendas. to shape global, regional in based and 1971, in a foundation as Incorporated is Forum Economic World the Switzerland, Geneva, not-for and impartial partisan or national interests. (www partisan or national interests. Global_Agenda_SRO_Layout 1 13.01.10 10:29 Page3 Global Agenda Council Reports 2010 Summaries of Global Agenda Council Discussions from the Summit on the Global Agenda 2009 Global_Agenda_SRO_Layout 1 13.01.10 10:29 Page4 This publication is also available in electronic form on the World Economic Forum’s website at the following address: The Global Agenda 2010 Web version: www.weforum.org/globalagenda2010 (HTML) The book is also available as a PDF: www.weforum.org/pdf/globalagenda2010.pdf Other specific information on the Network of Global Agenda Councils can be found at the following links: www.weforum.org/globalagenda2010 www.weforum.org/globalagenda2009/interviews www.weforum.org/globalagenda2009/reports www.weforum.org/globalagenda2009/webcasts The opinions expressed and data communicated in this publication are those of Global Agenda Council Members and do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Economic Forum. World Economic Forum 91-93 route de la Capite CH-1223 Cologny/Geneva Switzerland Tel.: +41 (0)22 869 1212 Fax: +41 (0)22 786 2744 E-mail: [email protected] www.weforum.org © 2010 World Economic Forum All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Illusory Distinction Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1992 The Illusory Distinction between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result David A. Strauss Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation David A. Strauss, "The Illusory Distinction between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result," 34 William and Mary Law Review 171 (1992). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ILLUSORY DISTINCTION BETWEEN EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY AND EQUALITY OF RESULT DAVID A. STRAUSS* I. INTRODUCTION "Our society should guarantee equality of opportunity, but not equality of result." One hears that refrain or its equivalent with increasing frequency. Usually it is part of a general attack on gov- ernment measures that redistribute wealth, or specifically on af- firmative action, that is, race- and gender-conscious efforts to im- prove the status of minorities and women. The idea appears to be that the government's role is to ensure that everyone starts off from the same point, not that everyone ends up in the same condi- tion. If people have equal opportunities, what they make of those opportunities is their responsibility. If they end up worse off, the government should not intervene to help them.1 In this Article, I challenge the usefulness of the distinction be- tween equality of opportunity and equality of result.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the Faculty Candidates
    MEET THE FACULTY CANDIDATES Candidates are displayed in alphabetically by last name. Prospective employers are invited to attend and while no event pre-registration is required however they must be registered for the BMES 2018 Annual Meeting. A business card will be required to enter the event. COMPLETE DETAILED CANDIDATE INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT www.bmes.org/faculty. Specialty - Biomaterials Alessia Battigelli Woo-Sik Jang Sejin Son John Clegg Patrick Jurney Young Hye Song R. Cornelison Kevin McHugh Ryan Stowers Yonghui Ding Yifeng Peng Varadraj Vernekar Victor Hernandez-Gordillo Shantanu Pradhan Scott Wilson Marian Hettiaratchi Eiji Saito Yaoying Wu Era Jain Andrew Shoffstall Specialty - Biomechanics Adam Abraham Vince Fiore Panagiotis Mistriotis Edward Bonnevie Zeinab Hajjarian Simone Rossi Alexander Caulk Xiao Hu Alireza Yazdani Venkat Keshav Chivukula Heidi Kloefkorn Rana Zakerzadeh Jacopo Ferruzzi Yizeng Li Specialty - Biomedical Imaging Mahdi Bayat Chong Huang Katheryne Wilson Zhichao Fan Jingfei Liu Kihwan Han Alexandra Walsh Specialty - BioMEMS Jaehwan Jung Aniruddh Sarkar Mengxi Wu Specialty - Cardiovascular Engineering Reza Avaz Kristin French Zhenglun (Alan) Wei Specialty - Cellular Engineering Annie Bowles Kate Galloway Kuei-Chun Wang Alexander Buffone Laurel Hind Mahsa Dabagh Matthew Kutys See other side for more candidates Specialty - Device Engineering (Microfluidics, Electronics, Machine-Body interface) Taslim Al-Hilal Brian Johnson David Myers Jungil Choi Tae Jin Kim Max Villa Haishui Huang Jiannan Li Ying Wang Specialty
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Peter Goldreich Member of the Board of Adjudicators Chairman of the Selection Committee for the Prize in Astronomy
    The Shaw Prize The Shaw Prize is an international award to honour individuals who are currently active in their respective fields and who have recently achieved distinguished and significant advances, who have made outstanding contributions in academic and scientific research or applications, or who in other domains have achieved excellence. The award is dedicated to furthering societal progress, enhancing quality of life, and enriching humanity’s spiritual civilization. Preference is to be given to individuals whose significant work was recently achieved and who are currently active in their respective fields. Founder's Biographical Note The Shaw Prize was established under the auspices of Mr Run Run Shaw. Mr Shaw, born in China in 1907, was a native of Ningbo County, Zhejiang Province. He joined his brother’s film company in China in the 1920s. During the 1950s he founded the film company Shaw Brothers (HK) Limited in Hong Kong. He was one of the founding members of Television Broadcasts Limited launched in Hong Kong in 1967. Mr Shaw also founded two charities, The Shaw Foundation Hong Kong and The Sir Run Run Shaw Charitable Trust, both dedicated to the promotion of education, scientific and technological research, medical and welfare services, and culture and the arts. ~ 1 ~ Message from the Chief Executive I warmly congratulate the six Shaw Laureates of 2014. Established in 2002 under the auspices of Mr Run Run Shaw, the Shaw Prize is a highly prestigious recognition of the role that scientists play in shaping the development of a modern world. Since the first award in 2004, 54 leading international scientists have been honoured for their ground-breaking discoveries which have expanded the frontiers of human knowledge and made significant contributions to humankind.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael S. Brown, MD
    DISTINGUISHED PHYSICIANS AND Michael S. Brown, M.D. Sir Richard Roberts, Ph.D. Winner, 1985 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Winner, 1993 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine MEDICAL SCIENTISTS MENTORING Winner, 1988 Presidential National Medal of Science A globally prominent biochemist and molecular biologist, DELEGATES HAVE INCLUDED... Dr. Brown received the world’s most prestigious medical Dr. Roberts was awarded the Nobel Prize for his prize for his work describing the regulation of the groundbreaking contribution to discovering RNA splicing. cholesterol metabolism. His work laid the foundation for Dr. Roberts is dedicating his future research to GMO crops the class of drugs now called statins taken daily by more than 20 million and food sources, and demonstrating the effect they have on humanity. — GRANDg MASTERS — people worldwide. Ferid Murad, M.D., Ph.D. Mario Capecchi, Ph.D. Boris D. Lushniak, M.D., M.P.H Winner, 1998 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Academy Science Director The Surgeon General of the United States (acting, 2013-2014) Winner, 2007 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine A world-renowned pioneer in biochemistry, Dr. Murad’s Winner, 2001 National Medal of Science Rear Admiral Lushniak, M.D., M.P.H., was the United award-winning research demonstrated that nitroglycerin Winner, 2001 Lasker Award States’ leading spokesperson on matters of public health, and related drugs help patients with heart conditions by Winner, 2003 Wolf Prize in Medicine overseeing the operations of the U.S. Public Health Service releasing nitric oxide into the body, thus relaxing smooth Mario Capecchi, Ph.D., a biophysicist, is a Distinguished Commissioned Corps, which consists of approximately muscles by elevating intracellular cyclic GMP, leading to vasodilation and Professor of Human Genetics at the University of Utah School of Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Ps Nobel Prizes for Site BEE 11.18.16 Revised 11.30.17.Pdf
    Nobel Laureates at the College of Physicians and Surgeons For years, College of Physicians and Surgeons alumni, faculty, and researchers have led groundbreaking clinical and basic scientific studies that have transformed our understanding of human biology and advanced the practice of medicine. On many occasions, this work has been honored with the Nobel Prize. The scope of research led by P&S Nobel laureates is tremendous. Although most of our prizewinners were honored for work in physiology or medicine, a few also received the prize for chemistry. Their research has fundamentally shaped the course of numerous fields, including cardiology, neuroscience, genetics, pharmaceutical development, and more. Our Nobel laureates include: André Cournand and Dickinson Richards (P&S’23), whose work at P&S on cardiac catheterization—a method of inserting a tiny tube into the heart—provided the basis for open-heart surgery and interventional cardiology Baruch Blumberg (P&S’51), who discovered the hepatitis B virus and helped develop a test and a vaccine for the virus Joshua Lederberg, a Columbia College and P&S graduate student who showed that bacteria can exchange genes when they reproduce, creating a way to model and study genetics in higher organisms Harold Varmus (P&S’66), who demonstrated how genes in normal human and animal cells can mutate to cause cancer, leading to a new generation of research on the genetic origins of cancer Eric Kandel, current University Professor, who showed how memories are stored in nerve cells, greatly enhancing
    [Show full text]
  • February 5, 2010, NIH Record, Vol. LXII, No. 3
    FEBRUARY 5, 2010 The Second Best Thing About Payday VOL. LXII, NO. 3 The Revolution Continues Green Offers Tour of Genomic Landscape, Circa 2010 By Rich McManus ABOVE · NIAID’s Alonda LeCounte sacrificed a kidney to benefit her stepfather. See story here is a good reason that Lipsett on p. 7. TAmphitheater was jammed with at- features tendees as NHGRI began its modestly titled Current Topics in Genome Analysis 1 course—an institute staple since 1995— Green Presents Challenges of Genomic Medicine on Jan. 12. The 11-lecture series that ends Mar. 23 was launched by NHGRI di- 3 rector Dr. Eric Green, who in 90 minutes Greider Explains Science Behind Her Nobel Prize surveyed highlights of what mankind has learned of its genetic heritage start- 5 ing before Mendel (1865) to the present. Harvard’s Frenk Lectures on Global Health A postdoctoral fellow at the outset of the Human Genome Project in 1990, NHGRI director Dr. Eric Green 7 Green offered a robust primer of a field NIAID Employee’s Generosity Offers that literally exploded during the “genomic revolution” of the 1990s. Having a front- Stepfather New Life row seat at what is arguably the most significant scientific endeavor of the past century 12 gives Green both authority and a rich fund of metaphor: the 3 billion base pairs NHGRI Fellow Plays with ‘Rock Stars see genome, page 6 Of Science’ Anything Is Possible Nobelist Nirenberg, MIT’s Herr Works to Discoverer of the Make Physical Genetic Code, departments Disabilities a Thing Mourned Of the Past By Alan Schechter Briefs 2 By Valerie Lambros Milestones 9 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Premios Nobel De Química
    Los premios Nobel de Química MATERIAL RECOPILADO POR: DULCE MARÍA DE ANDRÉS CABRERIZO Los premios Nobel de Química El campo de la Química que más premios ha recibido es el de la Quí- mica Orgánica. Frederick Sanger es el único laurea- do que ganó el premio en dos oca- siones, en 1958 y 1980. Otros dos también ganaron premios Nobel en otros campos: Marie Curie (física en El Premio Nobel de Química es entregado anual- 1903, química en 1911) y Linus Carl mente por la Academia Sueca a científicos que so- bresalen por sus contribuciones en el campo de la Pauling (química en 1954, paz en Física. 1962). Seis mujeres han ganado el Es uno de los cinco premios Nobel establecidos en premio: Marie Curie, Irène Joliot- el testamento de Alfred Nobel, en 1895, y que son dados a todos aquellos individuos que realizan Curie (1935), Dorothy Crowfoot Ho- contribuciones notables en la Química, la Física, la dgkin (1964), Ada Yonath (2009) y Literatura, la Paz y la Fisiología o Medicina. Emmanuelle Charpentier y Jennifer Según el testamento de Nobel, este reconocimien- to es administrado directamente por la Fundación Doudna (2020) Nobel y concedido por un comité conformado por Ha habido ocho años en los que no cinco miembros que son elegidos por la Real Aca- demia Sueca de las Ciencias. se entregó el premio Nobel de Quí- El primer Premio Nobel de Química fue otorgado mica, en algunas ocasiones por de- en 1901 al holandés Jacobus Henricus van't Hoff. clararse desierto y en otras por la Cada destinatario recibe una medalla, un diploma y situación de guerra mundial y el exi- un premio económico que ha variado a lo largo de los años.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aliquot Constant We first Show the Following Result on the Geometric Mean for the Ordi- Nary Sum of Divisors Function
    THE ALIQUOT CONSTANT WIEB BOSMA AND BEN KANE Abstract. The average value of log s(n)/n taken over the first N even integers is shown to converge to a constant λ when N tends to infinity; moreover, the value of this constant is approximated and proven to be less than 0. Here s(n) sums the divisors of n less than n. Thus the geometric mean of s(n)/n, the growth factor of the function s, in the long run tends to be less than 1. This could be interpreted as probabilistic evidence that aliquot sequences tend to remain bounded. 1. Introduction This paper is concerned with the average growth of aliquot sequences. An aliquot sequence is a sequence a0, a1, a2,... of positive integers ob- tained by iteration of the sum-of-aliquot-divisors function s, which is defined for n> 1 by s(n)= d. d|n Xd<n The aliquot sequence with starting value a0 is then equal to 2 a0, a1 = s(a0), a2 = s(a1)= s (a0),... ; k we will say that the sequence terminates (at 1) if ak = s (a0)=1 for some k ≥ 0. The sequence cycles (or is said to end in a cycle) k l 0 if s (a0) = s (a0) for some k,l with 0 ≤ l<k, where s (n) = n by arXiv:0912.3660v1 [math.NT] 18 Dec 2009 definition. Note that s is related to the ordinary sum-of-divisors function σ, with σ(n)= d|n d, by s(n)= σ(n) − n for integers n> 1.
    [Show full text]