DOCSLIB.ORG

EXPERIMENT: a Manifesto of Young England, 1928- 1931 Two Volumes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EXPERIMENT: a Manifesto of Young England, 1928- 1931 Two Volumes EXPERIMENT: A Manifesto of Young England, 1928- 1931 Two Volumes Vol. 2 of 2 Kirstin L. Donaldson PhD University of York History of Art September 2014 Table of Conents Volume Two Appendix: Full Transcript of Experiment Experiment 1 (November 1928) 261 Experiment 2 (February 1929) 310 Experiment 3 (May 1929) 358 Experiment 4 (November 1929) 406 Experiment 5 (February 1930) 453 Experiment 6 (October 1930) 501 Experiment 7 (Spring 1931) 551 260 EXPERIMENT We are concerned with all the intellectual interests of undergraduates. We do not confine ourselves to the work of English students, nor are we at pains to be littered with the Illustrious Dead and Dying. Our claim has been one of uncompromising independence: therefore not a line in these pages has been written by any but degreeless students or young graduates. It has been our object to gather all and none but the not yet ripe fruits of art, science and philosophy in the university. We did not wish so much that our articles should be sober and guarded as that they should be stimulating and lively and take up a strong line. We were prepared in fact to give ourselves away. But we know that Cambridge is painfully well-balanced just now (a sign, perhaps of anxiety neurosis) and so we were prepared also to find, as the reader will find, rather too guarded and sensible a daring. Perhaps we will ripen into extravagance. Contributions for the second number should be send to W. Empson of Magdalene College. We five are acting on behalf of the contributors, who have entrusted us with this part of the work. We have been asked to say that a volume of “Cambridge Poetry” is being produced by C. J. Saltmarshe, of Magdalene College, to whom contributions should be sent. * - 1 - * 261 POSTWAR The broken glass shocked before the crumpling of the Kaiser's picture: Frau Pfaff saw crackling chips destroying her carpet symmetry: the picture so long clad in custom-sanctity, hung from ineradicable hook. A red-faced young man in a flameblue tie, snorting defiantly against monarchy: no more war. That was nothing: he is a lodger nameless and paying. But that carpet blotch at his feet, that destruction of his – what would Herr Colonel have said coaxed to a second helping he gazes round sternly at wilted Fraulein Teufelmann, uncomfortable Herr Sikurius – but he was killed at Verdun, poor man, and his linen still in the cupboard – lofty Frau Max, and herself clever at presiding: fixing them with his patriotism, glasses to the Kaiser's health, the gardens, bands, illuminations, fat of the land. Clara Teufelmann his vir- ginia creeper, a pest and an adornment – why is she crying? – apoplexy in 1915 before he should see his God in Paris, so then she went elsewhere. He picks up the pieces and speaks hurriedly. “You know how changed things are – one feels strongly – youth in revolt.” Of course things are different now; but still, one remembers Herr Sikurius was so stiff and Frau Max disliked him so, but the Colonel kept the peace: united, Madam, Germany united, firm, invincible, Bismarck, I remember in '71: and mean- while they would fold their napkins for glasses to the Kaiser: blesséd meal ritual with leisure. “Yes, it is hard for us old people to get near new ideas. But I quite” then Frau Max magnificently would pull her shawl about her shoulders and tread out; the stumble to the door handle by Herr Sikurius ever a lame ending; but the Colonel sat on, dabbing a little at his damp moustache, his left hand lying jaggedly on the table cloth ; she would gather the cruets and talk quietly, and perhaps wrinkles at his mouthside would show him smiling a little. All so settled and unchanging, a long timeless period. But in 1914. But in 1914 the Colonel coming in with bottles, champagne, full uniform, flushed and *-- 2 --* 262 restless, Clara Teufelmann in colour for once with roses, clinging eyes smiling, and Herr Sikurius angularly worried – conscription, they got him – Frau Max sublime and confident. That meal broke life … He puts the fragments in the waste paper basket: with that crumpled picture – no – this hand stretched out: let be: things are changed. but the champagne toast, marching troops, Paris engulfed, repeating '71 Madam: but he was too old. They talked so eagerly and sat late, till Frau Max detached A little nervous bow, and he goes out. So lonely now and long dragging. These people nameless and meaningless, to be fed hurriedly and they go out and are busy perhaps while she sees to the linen, the bedrooms husks wrongly inhabited. But it is lunchtime. The staircase steps for Clara, Sikurius, Frau Max, the Colonel; shining smooth oil- cloth they wore down; but now these many light and meaningless feet. The meal ritual; these grey faces dotted round polite and cool, but who are they? He is still embarassed and stands out a little, sitting where the Colonel, steaming soup taureen; Frau Max delicate with her spoon and the Colonel coughing slightly from pepper but now please begin, I must retire for a moment, BASIL WRIGHT * - 3 - * 263 LETTER You were amused to find you too could fear “The eternal silence of the infinite spaces,” That net-work without fish, that mere Extended idleness, those pointless places Who, being possiblized to bear faces (Pascal's or such as yours) up-buoyed Are even of universes void. I approve, myself, dark spaces between stars; All privacy's their gift; they carry glances Through gulfs; and as for messages (thus Mars' Renown for wisdom their wise tact enhances, Hanged on the thread of radio advances) For messages, they are a wise go-between, And say what they think common-sense has seen. Only, have we space, common-sense in common, A tribe whose life-blood is our sacrament, Physics or metaphysics for your showman, For my physician in this banishment? Too non-Euclidean predicament. Where is that darkness that gives light its place? Or where such darkness as would hide your face? W. EMPSON POEM Buildings and cars are both stright lines perpendiculars meeting where no eye can see cutting one another where the static is left pointing skywards so they meet and diverge merging only in men who move and do not. G. REAVEY * - 4 - * 264 BEAUTY: A PROBLEM AND AN ATTITUDE TO LIFE I What is Beauty? In these words we have the eternal problem of aesthetic science, which gives it an original and undisputed territory beside logic, ethics, and on- tology, the riddle to which every generation, from the time of the great thinkers of Hellas to the experimentalist aesthetician of to-day, has set itself anew, producing results, in appearance at least, flagrantly and irredeemably contradictory, but never losing courage, anthusiasm, determination. It is the object of this article to hazard a solution, and the method employed will be the only method of modern aestheticians – with the solitary and notable exception of B. Croce and his disciples, who allow idealism to override the claims of positive science – I mean the empirical, psychological, method, introduced by the German Fechner, who gave, as it were, a second birth to aesthetic thought. Two individuals rouse our interest, the artist and the spectator, the genius of the creative imagination and the witness of beauty, but these pages are concerned exclusively with the latter. There are immense difficulties in the way of understanding the artist. He is, after all, a rare phenomenon, a curious and exceptional child of nature – in one sense, undoubtedly, a pervert, a monstrous anomaly, in as much as he lives for creation and not for life – and, besides, the evidence he has left us of himself – his own works, his letters, perhaps even an autobiography or the biographical account of a friend – is not only inadequate but too often absolutely unreliable. Further, in addition to not having indispensable material, it is at least doubtful if we ever can have it. The creative imagination is essentially an instinct, a mysterious force dwelling outside the conscious life of the artist, a force whose unforeseen and unforeseeable eruptions produce the sublime works that have dazzled men at all times and in all places. This consideration made the author hesitate before beginning his work on aesthetics. A theory of beauty which ignored the artist is manifestly incomplete, and it is certainly possible that we shall never penetrate * - 5 - * 265 the mystery of his soul, that the inner sanctuary will never be crossed save by the initiates themselves. But, on the other hand, if, as I believe, we are, each of us, a sculptor when we see a figure in bronze or in marble, a painter when we examine a canvas, a poet when we read a lyric or vibrate to the glories of nature, if, as Bosanquet puts it, the attitudes of the spectator us “a faint analogue of the creative rapture of the artist,” we shall not find that the two are separate countries divided by an unnavigable ocean, but that they are, in fact, one and the same country, though we shall only be wandering on the outskirts and the great mountains, the thundering cataracts, the unfathomable lakes, the mysterious valleys of the interior, will remain unexplored. But to drop metaphor. We will first describe the state of mind of the spectator, comparing and contrasting it with others, and then we will try to “fix” the constitutive elements, the essential ingredients, of the aesthetic attitude, distinguishing them sharply from the other sensations, emotions, sentiments, and ideas, that together compose the human personality.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Illusory Distinction Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Journal Articles Faculty Scholarship 1992 The Illusory Distinction between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result David A. Strauss Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation David A. Strauss, "The Illusory Distinction between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result," 34 William and Mary Law Review 171 (1992). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ILLUSORY DISTINCTION BETWEEN EQUALITY OF OPPORTUNITY AND EQUALITY OF RESULT DAVID A. STRAUSS* I. INTRODUCTION "Our society should guarantee equality of opportunity, but not equality of result." One hears that refrain or its equivalent with increasing frequency. Usually it is part of a general attack on gov- ernment measures that redistribute wealth, or specifically on af- firmative action, that is, race- and gender-conscious efforts to im- prove the status of minorities and women. The idea appears to be that the government's role is to ensure that everyone starts off from the same point, not that everyone ends up in the same condi- tion. If people have equal opportunities, what they make of those opportunities is their responsibility. If they end up worse off, the government should not intervene to help them.1 In this Article, I challenge the usefulness of the distinction be- tween equality of opportunity and equality of result.
    [Show full text]
  • Curtailing Inherited Wealth
    Michigan Law Review Volume 89 Issue 1 1990 Curtailing Inherited Wealth Mark L. Ascher University of Arizona College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr Part of the Law and Society Commons, Legislation Commons, and the Taxation-Federal Estate and Gift Commons Recommended Citation Mark L. Ascher, Curtailing Inherited Wealth, 89 MICH. L. REV. 69 (1990). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol89/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CURTAILING INHERITED WEALTH Mark L. Ascher* INTRODUCTION • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • . • • • 70 I. INHERITANCE IN PRINCIPLE........................... 76 A. Inheritance as a Natural Right..................... 76 B. The Positivistic Conception of Inheritance . 77 C. Why the Positivistic Conception Prevailed . 78 D. Inheritance - Property or Garbage?................ 81 E. Constitutional Concerns . 84 II. INHERITANCE AS A MATIER OF POLICY •• • . •••••.. •••• 86 A. Society's Stake in Accumulated Wealth . 86 B. Arguments in Favor of Curtailing Inheritance . 87 1. Leveling the Playing Field . 87 2. Deficit Reduction in a Painless and Appropriate Fashion........................................ 91 3. Protecting Elective Representative Government . 93 4. Increasing Privatization in the Care of the Disabled and the Elderly . 96 5. Expanding Public Ownership of National and International Treasures . 98 6. _Increasing Lifetime Charitable Giving . 98 7. Neutralizing the Co"osive Effects of Wealth..... 99 C. Arguments Against Curtailing Inheritance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Youth's Instructor for 1957
    Maryane Myers pictures in miniature the misery that comes with disaster: After Seven Years—Rain JULY 23, 1957 Bible Lesson for August 3 it ° WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS Are You a Berean? THE YOUTH'S INSTRUCTOR is read by many who COVER We are indebted to the Dallas do not necessarily accept the teachings and practices of its Morning News for the picture of a boy on Seventh-day Adventist publishers. It is to such readers that our our cover. He is smiling through a not-so- question is addressed—Are you a Berean? happy situation for many people. For a Tenor There is nothing mysterious about either the query or the of Our Times article turn to Maryane Myers' center-spread report, "After Seven Years— name it employs. Reference is made to the Bereans in the Scrip- Rain." A single article can give only a keyhole ture lesson beginning on page 17. Of them it was written: "These view of the disaster that has followed what were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the Weekly Reader of January 7-11, 1957, the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures credited scientists as saying was the worst daily, whether those things were so" (Acts 17:11). drought "in 700 years." Why were the residents of Berea judged more noble than the citizens of Thessalonica? Was it an accident of birth? or 23 Tenor of our times articles are item 23 inheritance? or public office? or renown in sports? or victories on our topic-frequency chart.
    [Show full text]
  • Cigarettesaftersex Biog2017 Copy
    ! ! BIOGRAPHY 2017 ! ! On August 18th 2017, Ghostpoet aka Obaro Ejimiwe returns with his eagerly anticipated fourth album. As the title suggests, Dark Days & Canapés is a record that siphons the sense of unease hanging in the air throughout the time of its creation and uses it as a fuel source. It’s also a record that dramatically fore- grounds the continuing evolution of twice- Mercury nominated Obaro as one of our most perspicacious and original songwriters. In the wake of 2015’s universally acclaimed Shedding Skin – an album which found him moving away from the beats-driven arrangements of the first two records – Dark Days & Canapés completes the transition to a fuller band sound. Integral to that transition was Obaro’s choice of producer for the record. “On previous records, the production side of things has run along 50:50 lines,” he explains, “But this time around, I wanted to see what would happen if I relaxed that a little.” Early in the process, he hooked up with producer/writer/ guitarist Leo Abrahams, perhaps best known for his work with Brian Eno and Jon Hopkins (Small Craft On A Milk Sea) and Wild Beasts (Present Tense) as well as his own feted solo albums. The two clicked immediately. “I went to his studio in East London,” recalls Obaro, “And the thing that struck me about him was that he was impossible to faze. I was de- scribing the mood I was after in quite fanciful, surreal terms, and yet he knew exactly how to translate !that into music.” The results of those early sessions - which saw guitarist Joe Newman assisting, fleshing out guitar parts on the early demos -quickly established the momentum of what followed.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit-1 T. S. Eliot : Religious Poems
    UNIT-1 T. S. ELIOT : RELIGIOUS POEMS Structure 1.0 Objectives 1.1 Introduction 1.2 ‘A Song for Simeon’ 1.3 ‘Marina’ 1.4 Let us sum up 1.5 Review Questions 1.6 A Select Bibliography 1.0 Objectives The present unit aims at acquainting you with some of T.S. Eliot’s poems written after his confirmation into the Anglo-Catholic Church of England in 1927. With this end in view, this unit takes up a close reading of two of his ‘Ariel Poems’ and focuses on some traits of his religious poetry. 1.1 Introduction Thomas Stearns Eliot was born on 26th September, 1888 at St. Louis, Missouri, an industrial city in the center of the U.S.A. He was the seventh and youngest child of Henry Ware Eliot and Charlotte Champe Stearns. He enjoyed a long life span of more than seventy-five years. His period of active literary production extended over a period of forty-five years. Eliot’s Calvinist (Puritan Christian) ancestors on father’s side had migrated in 1667 from East Coker in Somersetshire, England to settle in a colony of New England on the eastern coast of North America. His grandfather, W.G. Eliot, moved in 1834 from Boston to St. Louis where he established the first Unitarian Church. His deep academic interest led him to found Washington University there. He left behind him a number of religious writings. Eliot’s mother was an enthusiastic social worker as well as a writer of caliber. His family background shaped his poetic sensibility and contributed a lot to his development as a writer, especially as a religious poet.
    [Show full text]
  • T. S. Eliot Collection
    T. S. Eliot Collection Books and Pamphlets (unless otherwise noted, the first listing after each Gallup number is a first edition) The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock in Poetry. A Magazine of Verse. Edited by Harriet Monroe. June 1915. Gallup C18. The first appearance of the poem. Near fine copy. A2 Ezra Pound: His Metric and Poetry, Alfred A. Knopf, 1917 [i.e. 1918]. Good copy, a bit worn and faded. A4 Ara Vus Prec, The Ovid Press, 1920. Very good copy, light wear. Poems, Alfred A. Knopf, 1920 (first American edition), Head of spine chipped, otherwise very good. A5 The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. Alfred A. Knopf, 1921 (American issue). Fine in chipped dust jacket. ----- Alfred A. Knopf, 1930 (American issue). Good, no dust jacket. The Waste Land in The Dial, Vol. LXXIII, Number 5, November 1922. Gallup C135. Published “almost simultaneously” in The Criterion. Extremities of spine chipped, otherwise a very good copy. A8 Poems: 1909-1925, Faber & Gwyer Ltd., 1925 (first edition, ordinary copies). Very good, no dust jacket. ----- Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1932 (first American edition). Good only, no dust jacket. Poems: 1909-1925. Faber & Faber, 1932. Reset edition. Fine in dust jacket. 1 T. S Eliot Collection A9 Journey of the Magi, Faber & Gwyer Ltd., 1927. Very good. ----- Faber & Gwyer Ltd., 1927 (limited copies). Fine copy. ----- William Edwin Rudge, 1927 (first American edition). Copyright issue, one of only 27 copies. Fine copy. A10 Shakespeare and the Stoicism of Seneca, Humphrey Milford, Oxford University Press, 1927. Very good. A11 A Song for Simeon, Faber & Gwyer Ltd., 1928.
    [Show full text]
  • Temtestella1971.Pdf
    REPETITION IN POETRY OF T, S. ELIOT THROUGH =-WEDNESDAY A SDlINAR PAPER Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate College Wisconsin State University--La Crosse In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science M Stelh Margaret Temte January 1971 WISCONSIN STATE UNIVERSITY--LA CRQSSE CANDIDATE: Stella Margaret Temte f recommend acceptance of this seminar paper to the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of this candidate's requirements for the degree Master of Science in Teach- . Date Seminar Paper Advisor This seminar paper is approved for the Graduate College: Date ' REPETITION IN POETRY OF T. S. ELIOT THROUGH -ASH-WEDNESDAY ABSTRACT With a background of study in the poetry, plays, essays, and literary criticism of T. S. Eliot, I was intrigued by his commit- ment to the potenti- of language and the "music" of poetry. I particularly liked his use of repetition and realized it was a prominent rhetorical device in his poetry and plays. To write a seminar paper about Eliot's use of repetition it was necessary to study the many kinds of repetition as identified in classical rhetoric and to study their uses as described by authors and critics. Very early I became aware that 9 would have to limit my field to the poetry, excluding the plays; further, to selected poems; and finally, to selected poems, excluding the long -Four Quartets. There were several ways of approaching the task. I chose to analyze the poems as individual entities and to analyze them with reference to the repetition as it directs the reader to meaning and to what Eliot called the "deeper, unnamed feeline.
    [Show full text]
  • The Language of a Voidance in Ts Eliot's Treatment of the Birth And
    124 Religion, Literature and the Arts Project 'THE STILL UNSPEAKING AND UNSPOKEN WORD': THE LANGUAGE OF A VOIDANCE IN T.S. ELIOT'S TREATMENT OF THE BIRTH AND DEATH OF CHRIST' Charlotte Clutterbuck Whenever T.S. Eliot writes about the Crucifixion in his poetry, he distances jt by setting it in the past or the future, 1 or by using metaphor and grammatical devices. Only in The Rock does he mention the subject directly in main clauses, and then the reference is liturgical: And the Son of Man was not crucified once for all ... But the Son of Man is crucified always ... Chorus VI In Eliot's poetry, Christ is usually passive, and rarely the centre of attention. Eliot minimises Christ's humanity, never using the word 'Jesus', and only once, in Gerontion, using '011'ist'; instead he speaks of 'the Infant' or 'the Word'. His poetry is not devotional, and shows no compassion for the suffering man or the new-born baby, but concentrates on the theological meaning of Christ's life, on his divinity rather than his humanity. One reason for this may be Eliot's lifelong discomfort with human feelings,2 especially those surrounding 'Birth, and copulation, and death' (Sweeney Agonistes). Another may be the conflicting Catholic and Puritan traditions behind his own faith. Moreover, as Graham Hough has pointed out, the fragmentary mefuods of modernist poetry are not suited to Christian poetry, so that 'Eliot was a poet and a Christian, but he was never a Clu:istian poet - as George Herbert was a Christian poet'.
    [Show full text]
  • Mourning the Family Album
    Mourning the Family Album Tahneer Oksman a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, Volume 24, Number 2, Winter 2009, pp. 235-248 (Article) Published by The Autobiography Society DOI: 10.1353/abs.2010.0002 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/abs/summary/v024/24.2.oksman.html Access Provided by New York University at 08/17/12 1:24AM GMT Mourning the Family Album By Tahneer Oksman The oval portrait of a dog was me at an early age. Something shimmers, something is hushed up —John Ashbery, “This Room” ANY MEMOIRS begin with youth—not just as a convenient mode Mof organization, but because the early years represent a kind of clean slate of consciousness, a time before the full range of pos- sibilities for self-reflection can be realized. As literal relics of the past, photographs are especially interesting objects to use to think about the past idyllic image of a self, the image that is forever being held up against the present self. In Jo Spence’s photographic memoir Putting Myself in the Picture, for instance, there is a photograph of the face of a six-year-old smiling girl with light hair and short bangs. The note beneath the photo reads, “Six years: looking like an uncared for, but rather cheeky ‘orphan’. This is a ‘face’ I still see on me even now. Less often though” (86). However much Spence has moved away from this photograph both in time (as an adult) and in percep- tion (as a photographer who examines and destabilizes the idea of a fixed image/identity), she is still trapped within its frame.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
    Appeal: 14-1167 Doc: 94-1 Filed: 04/04/2014 Pg: 1 of 38 RECORD NUMBERS: 14-1167 (L), 14-1169, 14-1173 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit TIMOTHY B. BOSTIC, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, and JOANNE HARRIS, JESSICA DUFF, CHRISTY BERGHOFF and VICTORIA KIDD, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Intervenors, v. GEORGE E. SCHAEFER, III, in his official capacity as the Clerk of the Court for Norfolk Circuit Court, and JANET M. RAINEY, in her official capacity as State Registrar of Vital Records, et al., Defendants-Appellants, and MICHELE B. McQUIGG, in her official capacity as Prince William County Clerk of Circuit Court, et al., Intervenor / Defendant-Appellant. _______________________________________ ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA AT NORFOLK BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE DR. PAUL McHUGH IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND REVERSAL GERARD V. BRADLEY, ESQ. KEVIN T. SNIDER, ESQ. NOTRE DAME LAW SCHOOL PACIFIC JUSTICE INSTITUTE 3156 Eck Hall 212 9th Street, Suite 208 Notre Dame, Indiana 46556 Oakland, California 94607 (574) 631-8385 Telephone (510) 834-7232 Telephone (574) 631-8078 Facsimile (510) 834-8784 Facsimile Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Dr. Paul McHugh COUNSEL PRESS · (800) 3-APPEAL PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Appeal: 14-1167 Doc: 94-1 Filed: 04/04/2014 Pg: 2 of 38 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ......................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ................................................................................. 1 ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................. 3 I. Sexual Orientation Does Not Define a Discrete and Insular Minority.
    [Show full text]
  • "By Accident of Birth": the Battle Over Birthright Citizenship After United
    “By Accident of Birth”: The Battle over Birthright Citizenship After United States v. Wong Kim Ark Amanda Frost In theory, birthright citizenship has been well established in U.S. law since 1898, when the Supreme Court held in United States v. Wong Kim Ark that all born on U.S. soil are U.S. citizens. The experience of immigrants and their families over the last 120 years tells a different story, however. This article draws on government records documenting the Wong family’s struggle for legal recognition to illuminate the convoluted history of birthright citizenship. Newly discovered archival materials reveal that Wong Kim Ark and his family experienced firsthand, and at times shaped, the fluctuating relationship between immigration, citizenship, and access to civil and political rights. The U.S. government reacted to its loss in Wong’s case at first by refusing to accept the rule of birthright citizenship, and then by creating onerous proof-of-citizenship requirements that obstructed recognition of birthright citizenship for certain ethnic groups. But the Wong family’s story is not only about the use and abuse of government power. Government records reveal that the Wongs, like others in their position, learned how to use the immigration bureaucracy to their own advantage, enabling them to establish a foothold in the United States despite the government’s efforts to bar them from doing so. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................39 I. AN IMMIGRANT FAMILY’S BACKSTORY ............................................43 Ann Loeb Bronfman Distinguished Professor of Law and Government, American University. I am grateful for the American Council of Learned Societies, which awarded me a fellowship to support the research and writing of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Simply Eliot
    Simply Eliot Simply Eliot JOSEPH MADDREY SIMPLY CHARLY NEW YORK Copyright © 2018 by Joseph Maddrey Cover Illustration by José Ramos Cover Design by Scarlett Rugers All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, write to the publisher at the address below. [email protected] ISBN: 978-1-943657-25-4 Brought to you by http://simplycharly.com Extracts taken from The Poems of T. S. Eliot Volume 1, The Complete Poems and Plays, The Complete Prose of T. S. Eliot: The Critical Edition, The Letters of T. S. Eliot, Christianity and Culture, On Poetry and Poets, and To Criticize the Critic, Copyright T. S. Eliot / Set Copyrights Limited and Reproduced by permission of Faber & Faber Ltd. Extracts taken from Ash Wednesday, East Coker and Little Gidding, Copyright T. S. Eliot / Set Copyrights Ltd., first appeared in The Poems of T. S. Eliot Volume 1. Reproduced by permission of Faber & Faber Ltd. Excerpts from Ash Wednesday, East Coker and Little Gidding, from Collected Poems 1909-1962 by T. S. Eliot. Copyright 1936 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Copyright renewed 1964 by Thomas Stearns Eliot. Reprinted by permission of Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. All rights reserved. Extracts taken from Murder in the Cathedral, The Cocktail Party, The Confidential Clerk, and The Elder Statesman, Copyright T.
    [Show full text]