For National Security: Gen. Brent Scowcroft

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

For National Security: Gen. Brent Scowcroft Scowcroft Paper No. 3 For National Security: Gen. Brent Scowcroft Bartholomew Sparrow, PhD June 2016 A significant address presented at the Scowcroft Legacy Conference Bush School of Government and Public Service, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas on April 26, 2016 For more information: bush.tamu.edu/scowcroft/ 1 For National Security: Gen. Brent Scowcroft0F by Bartholomew Sparrow Professor of Government at the University of Texas at Austin “A friend in Washington is someone who In 1925 Scowcroft was born into a family stabs you in the chest.” Brent Scowcroft that was, as we see, established socially and well sometimes tells this joke to break the ice when off materially; indicatively, his parents were beginning a speech. The irony, though, is that married in the Mormon temple in Salt Lake City. Scowcroft has a great many friends and admirers. By all accounts he had a happy childhood. Brent It is this capacity for friendship, together with his was a member of the Boy Scouts, skied, played other personal qualities, his upbringing, military golf, and roamed around the Wasatch foothills background, and intellectualism, that have made with his friends, only blocks from his home. As him so remarkably effective and so very much the youngest of three children and the only son, respected and, it is fair to say, so adored in Scowcroft was, he concedes, “spoiled.” Not once Washington, around the country, and around the did he remember hearing his parents fight, and he world. never remembered feeling any tension at home. Later, reflecting on his upbringing, Scowcroft To understand General Scowcroft’s wryly observed that his idyllic childhood gave success as a policymaker means returning to his him a highly distorted view of his fellow 2 family background—at least in part. Brent humans.1F Scowcroft (no middle initial) grew up in Ogden, Utah, in an unusually secure and nurturing Upon reading West Point Today in 1937, at the environment. Two of his great-grandfathers were age of 12, he decided he wanted to go to West captains leading “companies” of Latter-day Point. Neither did the transformative effects on Saints on their journey by foot from Omaha to the American society of the Japanese attack on Pearl Great Salt Lake Basin. One was Job Pingree, a Harbor—which he remembers listening to radio successful merchant, prosperous banker—the co- broadcasts of with his parents—dissuade him founder of the Pingree National Bank—large from his dream. landowner, and one of Ogden’s first residents. The other was Richard Ballantyne, who Brigham Scowcroft attended a West Point prep Young selected to be one of “Seventy” of the program in Lafayette College in Easton, PA, Church of the Latter-Day Saints and was the where he overlapped with future senator Frank founder of the Mormon Sunday school system. A Church and Henry Kissinger, who were both with third, and Brent’s most famous great-grandfather, the Army Specialized Training Program. In July was John Scowcroft. John Scowcroft founded 1944 he started at the U.S. Military Academy, Scowcroft & Son’s, a highly successful dry goods where he was a member of the last WWII cohort wholesaler, which became the largest such that had a three-year curriculum, because of the company between the Mississippi and the wartime need for more Army and Army Air California coast. Its best-known product was Corps officers. Upon graduating in the top third “Never Rip Overalls,” which in 1909 Scowcroft of his class, he joined the Army Air Corps. & Sons produced at the rate of two-thousand pairs After training at air force bases in San per day. By 1914, the company employed 250 Antonio and Chandler, Arizona—where to workers alone for fabricating overalls, work survive the desert heat they had to get up at 4:00 pants, and work shirts. a.m. to fly—he became a pilot for a Strategic Air Command fighter escort. It was while on a dog- A significant address presented at the Scowcroft Legacy Conference Bush School of Government and Public Service, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas on April 26, 2016 For National Security: Gen. Brent Scowcroft fight training exercise in central New Hampshire, had spent several months at Mather Air Force in early January 1949 that “Scowcroft base in central California. miraculously escape[d] death” (as the Manchester Union Leader reported). The engine It was also while Scowcroft was at Valley of his F51B Mustang failed at 2000 feet, too low Forge Army Hospital that he received a letter an altitude to use the parachute, so Scowcroft from Col. Herman Beukema, the head of the tried to crash-land his aircraft. After tearing loose Department of Social Sciences at West Point and some telephone cables, hitting a stone bridge, and the former head of the Army Specialized Training missing a passenger bus by about a hundred Program, who invited him to return to the U.S. yards, Scowcroft’s plane came to rest on a frozen Military Academy to teach. After studying marsh, just outside Derry, New Hampshire. Public Law and Government at Columbia University for eighteen months and earning a Scowcroft had two broken vertebrae as Masters Degree, Scowcroft would teach for four well as other, less serious injuries, but he was years at his alma mater. He was then billeted to nonetheless in some ways fortunate: he could Belgrade, Yugoslavia, where he worked as the have easily been killed or paralyzed, and his assistant air attaché, a position in intelligence, for plane, full of fuel, could have caught fire and two years and where he became acquainted with exploded. Confined to a plaster cast from waist ambassador George Kennan. Scowcroft was then up initially and having to spend two years in assigned to teach at the Air Force Academy’s military hospitals because of complication, it was Department of Political Science, where he served a difficult period. Not only was he told that he as deputy department head and then department would not be able to fly again, but barely a month chair. after the crash he learned that his father, James Scowcroft, had died of heart failure. Scowcroft then went to work in the Pentagon under Maj. Gen. Richard Yudkin for The two had been close and Brent several years. He worked with U.S.-Latin assumed that his father would help him learn the American military relations, did Long-Range family business, which he would take up after his Planning, directed the Air Force’s component of time in the Army. But now, lying in hospital beds Vietnamization, and assisted the Joint Chiefs of for months on end and with a career in the family Staff. In between his various positions he business, absent his father, now much less attended the National War College and, with his appealing, Scowcroft realized he wanted to study performances, attracted the attention of his Air national security and to contribute to U.S. Force superiors. national security. It was no accident, then, that Gen. John The good news was that while at Valley Vogt selected Scowcroft as Nixon’s White House Forge Army Hospital recovering from his broken military assistant, upon the recommendation of back, Scowcroft met 1st Lt. Marian Horner, a Maj. Gen. James “Don” Hughes, who suggested nurse with the Army Air Corps. Marian, “Jackie” that Scowcroft replace him as military assistant. to her friends, was vivacious, outgoing, and Generals Hughes and Vogt figured that once immensely capable. She was a Roman Catholic Scowcroft took over as the President’s military from Syracuse, New York, two years older than assistant, he had the intelligence, academic Brent and, because of her great competence, training, administrative savvy, and personality to positive attitude, and strong work ethic, had just attract Kissinger’s attention. They knew that Lt. been awarded the “Outstanding Nurse” at Valley Gen. Alexander Haig, deputy to National Forge Army Hospital. Brent and Jackie married Security Advisor Henry Kissinger, wished to in September 1951, in Sumter, South Carolina return to the Army, and they wanted an Air Force (where she was stationed) after Scowcroft had officer to serve as Kissinger’s right-hand man, finally recovered after some complications and since the deputy national security advisor was the 2 For National Security: Gen. Brent Scowcroft first to brief the president each morning and was Embassy and Department of Defense, so as to in constant contact with the President by virtue of calculate how many persons remained to be Nixon’s role as commander in chief. evacuated. They coordinated actions with the State Department and the Pacific Command. Were Scowcroft to become Kissinger’s Mostly, though, they simply tried to impose order new deputy, he would be well placed to learn of and ensure a modicum of cohesion on what developments vital to Air Force interests, such as Scowcroft called a “confusing, crazy” mess. But diplomatic breakthroughs or early versions of the to Scowcroft’s and the administration’s credit, federal budget. Hughes and Vogt figured, too, the military was able to evacuate 130,000 that they would then be kept apprised of Vietnamese in April 1975, ten times the number Kissinger’s plans. Like other top Pentagon planned for by the State Department. In the final officers, they distrusted and feared Kissinger fourteen hours alone of April 29th and 30th, because of his unpredictable foreign policy and Marine helicopters succeeded in lifting out apparent influence over President Nixon. They almost 8,000 U.S. military personnel, Saigon particularly disliked having the National Security Embassy officials, South Vietnamese, and their Advisor tell them how many and what kind of dependents.
Recommended publications
  • President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 75) at the Gerald R
    Scanned from the President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 75) at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE THE DAILY DIARY OF PRESIDENT GERALD R. FORD PLACE DAY BEGAN DATE (Mo., Day, Yr.) "SPIRIT OF '76" JUNE 4, 1975 TIME DAY 12:41 a.m. WEDNESDAY PHONE I--­ TIME 1l ACTIVITY ~ ~--I-n---'---O-u-t-4 ~ 12:41 Enroute from Rome, Italy, the President and the First Lady arrived on board the "Spirit of '76" at Andrews AFB, Maryland. For a list of passengers, see the daily diary for June 3, 1975. 12:51 1:01 The President and the First Lady flew by helicopter from Andrews AFB to the South Grounds of the White House. For a list of passengers, see APPENDIX "A.tI 1:05 The President and the First Lady went to the second floor Residence. 7:05 The President had breakfast. 7:39 The President went to the Oval Office. 7:45 8:05 The President met with: David A. Peterson, Chief, Central Intelligence Agency/Office of Current Intelligence (CIA/OCI) White House Support Staff Lt. Gen. Brent Scowcroft, Deputy Assistant for National Security Affairs 8:05 8:25 The President met with his ASSistant, Donald H. Rumsfeld. 8:18 P The President telephoned Congressman Robert L.F. Sikes (D-Florida). The call was not completed. 8:22 P The President telephoned ~ongressman Guy Vander Jagt (R-Michigan). The call was not completed. 8:30 The President went to the South Grounds of the White House. 8:30 8:37 The President flew by helicopter from the South Grounds to Andrews AFB, Maryland.
    [Show full text]
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) ‘Whose Vietnam?’ - ‘Lessons learned’ and the dynamics of memory in American foreign policy after the Vietnam War Beukenhorst, H.B. Publication date 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Beukenhorst, H. B. (2012). ‘Whose Vietnam?’ - ‘Lessons learned’ and the dynamics of memory in American foreign policy after the Vietnam War. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:02 Oct 2021 Bibliography Primary sources cited (Archival material, government publications, reports, surveys, etc.) ___________________________________________________________ Ronald Reagan Presidential Library (RRPL), Simi Valley, California NSC 1, February 6, 1981: Executive Secretariat, NSC: folder NSC 1, NSC Meeting Files, Ronald Reagan Presidential Library (RRPL). ‘News clippings’, Folder: ‘Central American Speech April 27, 1983 – May 21, 1983’, Box 2: Central American Speech – Exercise reports, Clark, William P.: Files, Ronald Reagan Presidential Library (RRPL).
    [Show full text]
  • The National Security Council and the Iran-Contra Affair
    THE NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL AND THE IRAN- CONTRA AFFAIR Congressman Ed Jenkins* and Robert H. Brink** I. INTRODUCTION Early in November of 1986, newspapers in the United States carried the first reports that the United States government, in an effort to gain release of United States citizens held hostage by terrorists in Lebanon, had engaged in a covert policy of supplying arms to elements within Iran.' Later in that month, following a preliminary inquiry into the matter, it was revealed that some of the funds generated from those arms sales had been diverted to support the "Contra" 2 forces fighting the Sandinista government in Nicaragua. The events giving rise to these disclosures became known collectively as the "Iran-Contra Affair." Both elements of the affair raised serious questions regarding the formulation and conduct of our nation's foreign policy. In regard to the Iranian phase of the affair, the Regan administration's rhetoric had placed the administration firmly in op- position to any dealings with nations supporting terrorism, and with Iran in particular.' In addition, the United States had made significant * Member, United States House of Representatives, Ninth District of Georgia. LL.B., University of Georgia Law School, 1959. In 1987, Congressman Jenkins served as a member of the House Select Committee to Investigate Covert Arms Transactions with Iran. ** Professional Staff Member, Committee on Government Operations, United States House of Representatives. J.D., Marshall-Wythe School of Law, College of William and Mary, 1978. In 1987, Mr. Brink served as a member of the associate staff of the House Select Committee to Investigate Covert Arms Transactions with Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Brent Scowcroft
    BRENT SCOWCROFT As President of The Scowcroft Group and one of the country's leading experts on international policy, Brent Scowcroft provides clients with unparalleled strategic advice and assistance in dealing in the international arena. Brent Scowcroft served as the National Security Advisor to both Presidents Gerald Ford and George H.W. Bush, the only individual in U.S. history appointed to the position under two different Presidents. From 1982 to 1989, he was Vice Chairman of Kissinger Associates, Inc., an international consulting firm. In this capacity, he advised and assisted a wide range of U.S. and foreign corporate leaders on global joint venture opportunities, strategic planning, and risk assessment. His extraordinary twenty-nine-year military career began with graduation from West Point and concluded at the rank of Lieutenant General following service as the Deputy National Security Advisor. His Air Force service included Professor of Russian History at West Point; Assistant Air Attaché in Belgrade, Yugoslavia; Head of the Political Science Department at the Air Force Academy; Air Force Long Range Plans; Office of the Secretary of Defense International Security Assistance; Special Assistant to the Director of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and Military Assistant to President Nixon. Out of uniform, General Scowcroft continued in a public policy capacity by serving on the President's General Advisory Committee on Arms Control, the President's Commission on Strategic Forces, the President's Blue Ribbon Commission on Defense Management and the President's Special Review Board. In recent years, he has served as a co-chair for both the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future and the National Academies of Science's Committee on Science, Security, and Prosperity.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of State Ejournal 15 (February 2010)
    The Bureau of International Information Programs of the U.S. Department of State publishes a monthly electronic journal under the eJournal USA logo. These journals U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE / FEBRuaRY 2010 examine major issues facing the United States and the VOLUME 15 / NUMBER 2 international community, as well as U.S. society, values, http://www.america.gov/publications/ejournalusa.html thought, and institutions. International Information Programs: One new journal is published monthly in English and is Coordinator Daniel Sreebny followed by versions in French, Portuguese, Russian, and Executive Editor Jonathan Margolis Spanish. Selected editions also appear in Arabic, Chinese, Creative Director Michael Jay Friedman and Persian. Each journal is catalogued by volume and number. Editor-in-Chief Richard W. Huckaby Managing Editor Bruce Odessey The opinions expressed in the journals do not necessarily Production Manager/Web Producer Janine Perry reflect the views or policies of the U.S. government. The Graphic Designer Sylvia Scott U.S. Department of State assumes no responsibility for the content and continued accessibility of Internet sites Copy Editor Rosalie Targonski to which the journals link; such responsibility resides Photo Editor Maggie Sliker solely with the publishers of those sites. Journal articles, Cover Designer Diane Woolverton photographs, and illustrations may be reproduced and Graph Designers Vincent Hughes translated outside the United States unless they carry Reference Specialist Martin Manning explicit copyright restrictions, in which case permission must be sought from the copyright holders noted in the journal. Front Cover: © Getty Images The Bureau of International Information Programs maintains current and back issues in several electronic formats at http://www.america.gov/publications/ejournalusa.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Trade and Investment Policy
    U.S. Trade and Investment Policy and Investment U.S. Trade The Council on Foreign Relations sponsors Independent Task Forces to assess issues of current and critical importance to U.S. foreign policy and provide policymakers with con- crete judgments and recommendations. Diverse in backgrounds and perspectives, Task Force members aim to reach a meaningful consensus on policy through private and non- partisan deliberations. Once launched, Task Forces are independent of CFR and solely re- sponsible for the content of their reports. Task Force members are asked to join a consensus signifying that they endorse “the general policy thrust and judgments reached by the group, WKRXJKQRWQHFHVVDULO\HYHU\ÀQGLQJDQGUHFRPPHQGDWLRQµ(DFK7DVN)RUFHPHPEHUDOVR KDVWKHRSWLRQRISXWWLQJIRUZDUGDQDGGLWLRQDORUDGLVVHQWLQJYLHZ0HPEHUV·DIÀOLDWLRQV DUHOLVWHGIRULGHQWLÀFDWLRQSXUSRVHVRQO\DQGGRQRWLPSO\LQVWLWXWLRQDOHQGRUVHPHQW7DVN Force observers participate in discussions, but are not asked to join the consensus. Task Force Members Edward Alden James W. Owens Council on Foreign Relations Caterpillar, Inc. Nancy Birdsall William F. Owens Center for Global Development University of Denver James J. Blanchard Pamela S. Passman DLA Piper LLP Microsoft Corporation Andrew H. Card Matthew J. Slaughter Texas A&M University, Fleischman-Hillard Council on Foreign Relations; Thomas A. Daschle Dartmouth University DLA Piper LLP Andrew L. Stern I.M. (Mac) Destler Georgetown University University of Maryland William M. Thomas Harold E. Ford, Jr. American Enterprise Institute for Public Morgan Stanley Policy Research Leo Gerard* Laura D’Andrea Tyson United Steelworkers University of California Berkeley Independent Task Force Report No. 67 Daniel R. Glickman John K. Veroneau Aspen Institute Congressional Program; Covington and Burling LLP Independent Task Force Report No. 67 Report Force Task Independent Andrew H.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate and Foreign Interests Behind White House Push to Transfer U.S
    Corporate and Foreign Interests Behind White House Push to Transfer U.S. Nuclear Technology to Saudi Arabia Prepared for Chairman Elijah E. Cummings Second Interim Staff Report Committee on Oversight and Reform U.S. House of Representatives July 2019 oversight.house.gov EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On February 19, 2019, the Committee on Oversight and Reform issued an interim staff report prepared for Chairman Elijah E. Cummings after multiple whistleblowers came forward to warn about efforts inside the White House to rush the transfer of U.S. nuclear technology to Saudi Arabia. As explained in the first interim staff report, under Section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act, the United States may not transfer nuclear technology to a foreign country without the approval of Congress in order to ensure that the agreement meets nine nonproliferation requirements to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons. These agreements, commonly known as “123 Agreements,” are typically negotiated with career experts at the National Security Council (NSC) and the Departments of State, Defense, and Energy. The “Gold Standard” for 123 Agreements is a commitment by the foreign country not to enrich or re-process nuclear fuel and not to engage in activities linked to the risk of nuclear proliferation. During the Obama Administration, Saudi Arabia refused to agree to the Gold Standard. During the Trump Administration, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) went further, proclaiming: “Without a doubt, if Iran developed a nuclear bomb, we will follow suit as soon as possible.” There is strong bipartisan opposition to abandoning the “Gold Standard” for Saudi Arabia in any future 123 Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurasia Foundation Network
    Engaging Citizens Empowering Communities Eurasia2009 Network Foundation Yearbook Engaging Citizens, Empowering Communities Eurasia Foundation Network EURASIA FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL ASIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Advisory Council, Board of Trustees.....................1 2009 Letter from the Chair and President..............................2 The Eurasia Foundation Network......................................3 Yearbook Overview.....................................4 New Eurasia Foundation.................................5 Eurasia Foundation of Central Asia..........................6 Eurasia Partnership Foundation.................................7 East Europe Foundation.................................8 Youth Engagement...................9 Local Economic Development...........................11 Public Policy and The Eurasia Foundation Network comprises New Eurasia Foundation (Russia), Eurasia Foundation of Central Asia, Eurasia Partnership InstitutionFoundation Building.................13 (Caucasus), East Europe Foundation (Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova) and Eurasia Foundation (United States). Since 1993, Eurasia Foundation and the network have invested more than $360 million in local and cross-border projects to promote civic and economic inclusion throughout the Eurasia region.Independent Media.................15 For more information about the Eurasia Foundation Network, please visit http://www.eurasia.org/ Cross-Border Programs ........17 Eurasia Foundation Financials..................................19 EAST EUROPE EURASIA FOUNDATION EFFOUNDATION Network
    [Show full text]
  • “Leaving Them to Stew in Their Own Juice”
    “Leaving them to Stew in Their Own Juice” US-Syrian Relations and the Lebanese Civil War,1981-1984 Magnus Seland Andersson Master’s Thesis in History – Institute of Archeology, Conservation and History – Faculty of Humanities University of OSLO Spring 2018 II “Leaving them to Stew in Their Own Juice” US-Syrian Relations and the Lebanese Civil War,1981-1984 III © Magnus Seland Andersson 2018 “Leaving Them To Stew in Their Own Juice:” US-Syrian Relations and the Lebanese Civil War, 1981-1985 Magnus Seland Andersson Cover photo: The National Security Planning Group discussing the Beirut barracks bombing, October 23rd 1983. Courtesy of Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and Museum http://www.duo.uio.no/ Trykk: Reprosentralen, Universitetet i Oslo IV Summary US-Syrian relations in the first half of the 1980’s was dominated by the Lebanese Civil War (1975-1990). US involvement in the conflict started with the 1981 missile crisis in which a stand-off between the Phalange, a Christian Maronite militia backed by Israel, challenged Syria’s hold over the Bekaa Valley in Lebanon. The Reagan administration saw Syria as a Soviet proxy, but there was no consensus on how to approach Hafez al-Assad’s Syria, or the Lebanese conflict. The US entered the stand-off as a mediator, concluding negotiations in late July 1981. But there was little follow-up between Syria and the United States. Instead, the Reagan administration consistently attempted to increase its cooperation with Israel in the Middle East, as well as that of other “moderate” Arab states, such as Egypt and Saudi Arabia.When Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982 to combat the PLO, the US again inserted itself into the conflict as a mediator between Syria and Israel, and the PLO and the Lebanese to withdrawal of “all foreign forces” from the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Policy Challenges Facing the Obama Administration the Wheatley Institution and Brent Scowcroft the David M
    Wheatley Papers on International Affairs Foreign Policy Challenges Facing the Obama Administration the wheatley institution and Brent Scowcroft the david m. kennedy center for President and Founder, Scowcroft Group; Former National Security Advisor international studies Brigham Young University September 29, 2009 © Brent Scowcroft Brent Scowcroft As president and founder of the Scowcroft Group and one of the country’s leading experts on international policy, Brent Scowcroft provides unparalleled strategic advice and assistance in dealing in the international arena. Scowcroft has served as the national security advisor to presidents Ford and Bush. From 1982 to 1989 he was vice chair of Kissinger Associates, Inc., an international consulting firm. In this capacity he advised and assisted a wide range of U.S. and foreign corporate leaders on global joint venture opportunities, strategic planning, and risk assessment. Scowcroft’s extraordinary 29-year military career began with graduation from West Point and concluded with his achieving the rank of lieutenant general following service as the deputy national security advisor. His air force service includes being a Russian history assistant professor at West Point; assistant air attaché in Belgrade, Yugoslavia; head of the political science department at the Air Force Academy; involvement in air force long-range plans; working in international security assistance for the Office of the Secretary of Defense; serving as special assistant to the director of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and serving as military assistant to President Nixon. Out of uniform Scowcroft has continued in a public policy capacity by serving on the president’s advisory committee on arms control, the commission on strategic forces, and the president’s special review board, also known as the Tower Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Precedent for the Service of Active Duty Three-Star Generals and Flag
    MEMORANDUM March 2, 2017 Subject: Precedent for the Service of Active Duty Three-Star Generals and Flag Officers as the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs From: Heidi Peters, Research Librarian, 7-0702 Lawrence Kapp, Specialist in Military Manpower Policy, 7-7609 Kathleen McInnis, Analyst in International Security, 7-1416 This memorandum was prepared to enable distribution to more than one congressional office. On February 20, 2017, the Trump Administration announced the appointment of U.S. Army Lieutenant General Herbert Raymond “H.R.” McMaster, Jr. to serve as the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.1 The Trump Administration further indicated that Lieutenant General McMaster would remain on active duty status following his assumption of the duties of the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs—a position that is also frequently referred to by the title of National Security Advisor. U.S. Presidents have acted in three previous instances to designate three-star active duty U.S. military flag and general officers as the National Security Advisor: U.S. Air Force Lieutenant General Brent Scowcroft in 1975; U.S. Navy Vice Admiral John M. Poindexter in 1985; and U.S. Army Lieutenant General Colin L. Powell in 1987. While Scowcroft retired from active duty military service shortly after his designation as National Security Advisor by President Gerald Ford, Poindexter and Powell remained in their grades as three-star military officers while serving as the National Security Advisor, choices which mandated the involvement of the U.S. Senate. This memorandum proceeds in the following manner.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2000 – February 2001)
    U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century (click on heading to be linked directly to that section) Phase 1 (July 1998 - August 1999) Major Themes And Implications Supporting Research And Analysis Phase 2 (August 2000 – April 2000) Seeking A National Strategy: A Concert For Preserving Security And Promoting Freedom Phase 3 (April 2000 – February 2001) Roadmap For National Security: Imperative For Change 71730_DAPS.qx 10/12/99 5:06 PM Page #1 NEW WORLD COMING: AMERICAN SECURITY IN THE 21ST CENTURY MAJOR THEMES AND IMPLICATIONS The Phase I Report on the Emerging Global Security Environment for the First Quarter of the 21st Century The United States Commission on National Security/21st Century September 15, 1999 71730_DAPS.qx 10/12/99 5:06 PM Page #3 Preface In 1947, President Harry Truman signed into law the National Security Act, the landmark U.S. national security legislation of the latter half of the 20th century. The 1947 legislation has served us well. It has undergirded our diplomatic efforts, provided the basis to establish our military capa- bilities, and focused our intelligence assets. But the world has changed dramatically in the last fifty years, and particularly in the last decade. Institutions designed in another age may or may not be appropriate for the future. It is the mandate of the United States Commission on National Security/21st Century to examine precise- ly that question. It has undertaken to do so in three phases: the first to describe the world emerging in the first quarter of the next century, the second to design a national security strategy appropri- ate to that world, and the third to propose necessary changes to the national security structure in order to implement that strategy effectively.
    [Show full text]