DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Department of State Ejournal 15 (February 2010)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Department of State Ejournal 15 (February 2010) The Bureau of International Information Programs of the U.S. Department of State publishes a monthly electronic journal under the eJournal USA logo. These journals U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE / FEBRuaRY 2010 examine major issues facing the United States and the VOLUME 15 / NUMBER 2 international community, as well as U.S. society, values, http://www.america.gov/publications/ejournalusa.html thought, and institutions. International Information Programs: One new journal is published monthly in English and is Coordinator Daniel Sreebny followed by versions in French, Portuguese, Russian, and Executive Editor Jonathan Margolis Spanish. Selected editions also appear in Arabic, Chinese, Creative Director Michael Jay Friedman and Persian. Each journal is catalogued by volume and number. Editor-in-Chief Richard W. Huckaby Managing Editor Bruce Odessey The opinions expressed in the journals do not necessarily Production Manager/Web Producer Janine Perry reflect the views or policies of the U.S. government. The Graphic Designer Sylvia Scott U.S. Department of State assumes no responsibility for the content and continued accessibility of Internet sites Copy Editor Rosalie Targonski to which the journals link; such responsibility resides Photo Editor Maggie Sliker solely with the publishers of those sites. Journal articles, Cover Designer Diane Woolverton photographs, and illustrations may be reproduced and Graph Designers Vincent Hughes translated outside the United States unless they carry Reference Specialist Martin Manning explicit copyright restrictions, in which case permission must be sought from the copyright holders noted in the journal. Front Cover: © Getty Images The Bureau of International Information Programs maintains current and back issues in several electronic formats at http://www.america.gov/publications/ejournalusa. html. Comments are welcome at your local U.S. Embassy or at the editorial offices: Editor, eJournal USA IIP/PUBJ SA-5, 1st Floor U.S. Department of State 2200 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20522-0501 United States of America E-mail: [email protected] eJOURNAL USA About This Issue “I state clearly and with conviction America’s commitment to seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons. I’m not naive. This goal will not be reached quickly — perhaps not in my lifetime. It will take patience and persistence…” —U.S. President Barack Obama, April 5, 2009 n 1931, Albert Einstein described himself as “not only that the world may be safer with a few acknowledged a pacifist but a militant pacifist.” Eight years later nuclear weapons than with promises that all have been IEinstein wrote President Franklin D. Roosevelt that foresworn. Feature essays explore thoroughly the existing “it may be possible to set up a nuclear chain reaction in a Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the obstacles to its large mass of uranium, by which extension. We review Obama vast amounts of power and large administration policy, and also quantities of new radium-like ele- how the issues look from the ments would be generated … it is Russian vantage point, and conceivable — though much less from the perspective of nations certain — that extremely power- that choose not to proliferate. ful bombs of this type may thus We outline past arms control be constructed.” Einstein warned efforts — some produced the president that Nazi Germany better results than others. We already had prohibited the export ask the question: Why did of uranium, and he suggested some nations build thousands that the U.S. government speed of nuclear weapons? And we up atomic research. profile a program that already Roosevelt launched the has eliminated some 15,000 Manhattan Project, the top secret nuclear warheads. U.S.-U.K.-Canada crash effort When a leading pacifist that produced the world’s first calls for an atomic bomb and atomic bomb. When it detonat- the man most responsible ed, on July 16, 1945, at Alamog- for producing it opposes ordo Test Range in New Mexico, its growing destructiveness, the project’s scientific director, we know that the issues are Robert Oppenheimer, recalled tangled. When the leader of the the words of the Bhagavad Gita: United States of America sets “Now I am become death, the a goal and in the next sentence destroyer of worlds.” Oppen- suggests it may not be fully heimer later would oppose, unsuccessfully, development of achieved in his lifetime, we know the issues are difficult. the still more fearsome hydrogen bomb. We hope readers of this eJournal come to appreciate just Speaking last year in Prague, President Barack Obama how difficult and, most importantly, leave us this month offered a U.S. commitment to seek a world without nuclear determined along with President Obama to build a safe and weapons. But he also acknowledged that the objective peaceful world, no matter how long it takes. might not be achieved in his lifetime. How that goal might be attained, and why getting there is so difficult, is the subject of this eJournal USA. —The Editors Our contributors approach the issue from every angle. Most agree with President Obama’s objective, although one, a former U.S. national security adviser, argues eJOURNAL USA 1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE / FEBRuaRY 2010 / VOLUME 15 / NUMBER 2 http://www.america.gov/publications/ejournalusa.html A World Free of Nuclear Weapons THREAT AND PROMISE 17 Beyond Existing Treaties Rebe CCA JO HNS O N (UN ite D KI NGD O M ), EX E CU ti V E 4 Obama’s Commitment DI R E C to R , ACR O NYM INS tit U te F O R DI SARMAM E N T ELL E N O. TAUSCH E R , UND E R SE CR etARY O F ST A te DI PL O MACY F O R ARMS CO N T R O L AND IN te RNA tio NAL SE CUR it Y The 2010 review conference on nuclear weapons Other people have talked about achieving a world nonproliferation should start laying the groundwork without nuclear weapons. President Obama is trying for a treaty abolishing nuclear weapons. to make it happen. DISARMAMENT AttEMPTS PAST 6 The Transformation of U.S. Nuclear Policy 20 Successes and Failures JO S E PH CIRINCioNE, PR E S I D E N T , PL O UGHSHAR E S JE R E M I SUR I , PR O F E SS O R O F HI S to RY , UNIVERSitY FUND O F WI SC O NS I N -MAD I S O N President Obama faces plenty of obstacles, especially The 20th century had some successes and some cynicism. failures in arms control. 9 Playing Percentages UNITED STATES AND RUSSIA AN IN te RV ie W Wit H BR E N T SC O WCR O F T , FO RM E R U.S. NA tio NAL SE CUR it Y ADV I S E R 25 Why the Stockpiles? Zero nuclear weapons could make for an even more JO NA T HAN Ree D WI NKL E R , ASS O C I Ate PR O F E SS O R unstable world. O F HI S to RY , WR I GH T ST A te UNIVERSitY Maintaining huge and expensive nuclear warhead 13 Nonproliferation’s Contribution stockpiles was the cost of peace during the Cold War. Geo RG E PE RK O V I CH , DI R E C to R , AND Dee P ti CH O U be Y , DE PU T Y DI R E C to R , NUCL E AR 27 U.S.-Russia Balancing Act PO L I CY PR O GRAM , CARN E G ie END O WM E N T F O R DM it R I TR E N I N (RUSS I A ), DI R E C to R , CARN E G ie IN te RNA tio NAL PE AC E MO SC O W CE N te R Cooperation among the nuclear powers on Russian leaders publicly support the idea of a world preventing proliferation requires upholding the free of nuclear weapons but lack a clear strategy to bargain between disarmament and nonproliferation. advance this vision. 16 Fission, Fusion Nuclear weapons can achieve their destructive power in two different ways. eJOURNAL USA 2 29 Megatons to Megawatts 33 The Commitment of Non-Nuclear ANDR E W NE WMAN (AUS T RAL I A ), RE S E ARCH Weapon States ASS O C I Ate , HARVARD UNIVERSitY IRMA ARGÜ E LL O (ARG E N ti NA ), FO UND E R AND Thanks to the Megatons to Megawatts program, CHA I R , NO NPR O L I F E RA tio N F O R GL ob AL half of U.S. nuclear energy comes from dismantled SE CUR it Y FO UNDA tio N Russian nuclear warheads. All countries must learn that abolishing nuclear weapons will enhance the security of all PERSPECTIVES countries. 31 Young People to the Fore 35 By the Numbers JO HAN BE RG E NÄS (SW E D E N ), RE S E ARCH ASS O C I Ate , MO N te R E Y INS tit U te O F IN te RNA tio NAL ST UD ie S 36 Additional Resources Progress toward a world rid of nuclear weapons depends on the world’s young people. 32 A Safer World for All JAYAN T HA DHANAPALA (SR I LANKA ), PR E S I D E N T , PUGWASH CO NF E R E NC E S O N SC ie NC E AND WO RLD AFFA I RS A verifiable global agreement on eliminating nuclear weapons would make all of the world’s people safer equally. eJOURNAL USA 3 THR E A T AND PR O M I S E Obama’s Commitment Ellen O.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 75) at the Gerald R
    Scanned from the President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 75) at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE THE DAILY DIARY OF PRESIDENT GERALD R. FORD PLACE DAY BEGAN DATE (Mo., Day, Yr.) "SPIRIT OF '76" JUNE 4, 1975 TIME DAY 12:41 a.m. WEDNESDAY PHONE I--­ TIME 1l ACTIVITY ~ ~--I-n---'---O-u-t-4 ~ 12:41 Enroute from Rome, Italy, the President and the First Lady arrived on board the "Spirit of '76" at Andrews AFB, Maryland. For a list of passengers, see the daily diary for June 3, 1975. 12:51 1:01 The President and the First Lady flew by helicopter from Andrews AFB to the South Grounds of the White House. For a list of passengers, see APPENDIX "A.tI 1:05 The President and the First Lady went to the second floor Residence. 7:05 The President had breakfast. 7:39 The President went to the Oval Office. 7:45 8:05 The President met with: David A. Peterson, Chief, Central Intelligence Agency/Office of Current Intelligence (CIA/OCI) White House Support Staff Lt. Gen. Brent Scowcroft, Deputy Assistant for National Security Affairs 8:05 8:25 The President met with his ASSistant, Donald H. Rumsfeld. 8:18 P The President telephoned Congressman Robert L.F. Sikes (D-Florida). The call was not completed. 8:22 P The President telephoned ~ongressman Guy Vander Jagt (R-Michigan). The call was not completed. 8:30 The President went to the South Grounds of the White House. 8:30 8:37 The President flew by helicopter from the South Grounds to Andrews AFB, Maryland.
    [Show full text]
  • Brent Scowcroft
    BRENT SCOWCROFT As President of The Scowcroft Group and one of the country's leading experts on international policy, Brent Scowcroft provides clients with unparalleled strategic advice and assistance in dealing in the international arena. Brent Scowcroft served as the National Security Advisor to both Presidents Gerald Ford and George H.W. Bush, the only individual in U.S. history appointed to the position under two different Presidents. From 1982 to 1989, he was Vice Chairman of Kissinger Associates, Inc., an international consulting firm. In this capacity, he advised and assisted a wide range of U.S. and foreign corporate leaders on global joint venture opportunities, strategic planning, and risk assessment. His extraordinary twenty-nine-year military career began with graduation from West Point and concluded at the rank of Lieutenant General following service as the Deputy National Security Advisor. His Air Force service included Professor of Russian History at West Point; Assistant Air Attaché in Belgrade, Yugoslavia; Head of the Political Science Department at the Air Force Academy; Air Force Long Range Plans; Office of the Secretary of Defense International Security Assistance; Special Assistant to the Director of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and Military Assistant to President Nixon. Out of uniform, General Scowcroft continued in a public policy capacity by serving on the President's General Advisory Committee on Arms Control, the President's Commission on Strategic Forces, the President's Blue Ribbon Commission on Defense Management and the President's Special Review Board. In recent years, he has served as a co-chair for both the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future and the National Academies of Science's Committee on Science, Security, and Prosperity.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Trade and Investment Policy
    U.S. Trade and Investment Policy and Investment U.S. Trade The Council on Foreign Relations sponsors Independent Task Forces to assess issues of current and critical importance to U.S. foreign policy and provide policymakers with con- crete judgments and recommendations. Diverse in backgrounds and perspectives, Task Force members aim to reach a meaningful consensus on policy through private and non- partisan deliberations. Once launched, Task Forces are independent of CFR and solely re- sponsible for the content of their reports. Task Force members are asked to join a consensus signifying that they endorse “the general policy thrust and judgments reached by the group, WKRXJKQRWQHFHVVDULO\HYHU\ÀQGLQJDQGUHFRPPHQGDWLRQµ(DFK7DVN)RUFHPHPEHUDOVR KDVWKHRSWLRQRISXWWLQJIRUZDUGDQDGGLWLRQDORUDGLVVHQWLQJYLHZ0HPEHUV·DIÀOLDWLRQV DUHOLVWHGIRULGHQWLÀFDWLRQSXUSRVHVRQO\DQGGRQRWLPSO\LQVWLWXWLRQDOHQGRUVHPHQW7DVN Force observers participate in discussions, but are not asked to join the consensus. Task Force Members Edward Alden James W. Owens Council on Foreign Relations Caterpillar, Inc. Nancy Birdsall William F. Owens Center for Global Development University of Denver James J. Blanchard Pamela S. Passman DLA Piper LLP Microsoft Corporation Andrew H. Card Matthew J. Slaughter Texas A&M University, Fleischman-Hillard Council on Foreign Relations; Thomas A. Daschle Dartmouth University DLA Piper LLP Andrew L. Stern I.M. (Mac) Destler Georgetown University University of Maryland William M. Thomas Harold E. Ford, Jr. American Enterprise Institute for Public Morgan Stanley Policy Research Leo Gerard* Laura D’Andrea Tyson United Steelworkers University of California Berkeley Independent Task Force Report No. 67 Daniel R. Glickman John K. Veroneau Aspen Institute Congressional Program; Covington and Burling LLP Independent Task Force Report No. 67 Report Force Task Independent Andrew H.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurasia Foundation Network
    Engaging Citizens Empowering Communities Eurasia2009 Network Foundation Yearbook Engaging Citizens, Empowering Communities Eurasia Foundation Network EURASIA FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL ASIA TABLE OF CONTENTS Advisory Council, Board of Trustees.....................1 2009 Letter from the Chair and President..............................2 The Eurasia Foundation Network......................................3 Yearbook Overview.....................................4 New Eurasia Foundation.................................5 Eurasia Foundation of Central Asia..........................6 Eurasia Partnership Foundation.................................7 East Europe Foundation.................................8 Youth Engagement...................9 Local Economic Development...........................11 Public Policy and The Eurasia Foundation Network comprises New Eurasia Foundation (Russia), Eurasia Foundation of Central Asia, Eurasia Partnership InstitutionFoundation Building.................13 (Caucasus), East Europe Foundation (Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova) and Eurasia Foundation (United States). Since 1993, Eurasia Foundation and the network have invested more than $360 million in local and cross-border projects to promote civic and economic inclusion throughout the Eurasia region.Independent Media.................15 For more information about the Eurasia Foundation Network, please visit http://www.eurasia.org/ Cross-Border Programs ........17 Eurasia Foundation Financials..................................19 EAST EUROPE EURASIA FOUNDATION EFFOUNDATION Network
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Policy Challenges Facing the Obama Administration the Wheatley Institution and Brent Scowcroft the David M
    Wheatley Papers on International Affairs Foreign Policy Challenges Facing the Obama Administration the wheatley institution and Brent Scowcroft the david m. kennedy center for President and Founder, Scowcroft Group; Former National Security Advisor international studies Brigham Young University September 29, 2009 © Brent Scowcroft Brent Scowcroft As president and founder of the Scowcroft Group and one of the country’s leading experts on international policy, Brent Scowcroft provides unparalleled strategic advice and assistance in dealing in the international arena. Scowcroft has served as the national security advisor to presidents Ford and Bush. From 1982 to 1989 he was vice chair of Kissinger Associates, Inc., an international consulting firm. In this capacity he advised and assisted a wide range of U.S. and foreign corporate leaders on global joint venture opportunities, strategic planning, and risk assessment. Scowcroft’s extraordinary 29-year military career began with graduation from West Point and concluded with his achieving the rank of lieutenant general following service as the deputy national security advisor. His air force service includes being a Russian history assistant professor at West Point; assistant air attaché in Belgrade, Yugoslavia; head of the political science department at the Air Force Academy; involvement in air force long-range plans; working in international security assistance for the Office of the Secretary of Defense; serving as special assistant to the director of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and serving as military assistant to President Nixon. Out of uniform Scowcroft has continued in a public policy capacity by serving on the president’s advisory committee on arms control, the commission on strategic forces, and the president’s special review board, also known as the Tower Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Precedent for the Service of Active Duty Three-Star Generals and Flag
    MEMORANDUM March 2, 2017 Subject: Precedent for the Service of Active Duty Three-Star Generals and Flag Officers as the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs From: Heidi Peters, Research Librarian, 7-0702 Lawrence Kapp, Specialist in Military Manpower Policy, 7-7609 Kathleen McInnis, Analyst in International Security, 7-1416 This memorandum was prepared to enable distribution to more than one congressional office. On February 20, 2017, the Trump Administration announced the appointment of U.S. Army Lieutenant General Herbert Raymond “H.R.” McMaster, Jr. to serve as the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs.1 The Trump Administration further indicated that Lieutenant General McMaster would remain on active duty status following his assumption of the duties of the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs—a position that is also frequently referred to by the title of National Security Advisor. U.S. Presidents have acted in three previous instances to designate three-star active duty U.S. military flag and general officers as the National Security Advisor: U.S. Air Force Lieutenant General Brent Scowcroft in 1975; U.S. Navy Vice Admiral John M. Poindexter in 1985; and U.S. Army Lieutenant General Colin L. Powell in 1987. While Scowcroft retired from active duty military service shortly after his designation as National Security Advisor by President Gerald Ford, Poindexter and Powell remained in their grades as three-star military officers while serving as the National Security Advisor, choices which mandated the involvement of the U.S. Senate. This memorandum proceeds in the following manner.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2000 – February 2001)
    U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century (click on heading to be linked directly to that section) Phase 1 (July 1998 - August 1999) Major Themes And Implications Supporting Research And Analysis Phase 2 (August 2000 – April 2000) Seeking A National Strategy: A Concert For Preserving Security And Promoting Freedom Phase 3 (April 2000 – February 2001) Roadmap For National Security: Imperative For Change 71730_DAPS.qx 10/12/99 5:06 PM Page #1 NEW WORLD COMING: AMERICAN SECURITY IN THE 21ST CENTURY MAJOR THEMES AND IMPLICATIONS The Phase I Report on the Emerging Global Security Environment for the First Quarter of the 21st Century The United States Commission on National Security/21st Century September 15, 1999 71730_DAPS.qx 10/12/99 5:06 PM Page #3 Preface In 1947, President Harry Truman signed into law the National Security Act, the landmark U.S. national security legislation of the latter half of the 20th century. The 1947 legislation has served us well. It has undergirded our diplomatic efforts, provided the basis to establish our military capa- bilities, and focused our intelligence assets. But the world has changed dramatically in the last fifty years, and particularly in the last decade. Institutions designed in another age may or may not be appropriate for the future. It is the mandate of the United States Commission on National Security/21st Century to examine precise- ly that question. It has undertaken to do so in three phases: the first to describe the world emerging in the first quarter of the next century, the second to design a national security strategy appropri- ate to that world, and the third to propose necessary changes to the national security structure in order to implement that strategy effectively.
    [Show full text]
  • A National Pragmatic Safety Limit for Nuclear Weapon Quantities Joshua Pearce, David Denkenberger
    A National Pragmatic Safety Limit for Nuclear Weapon Quantities Joshua Pearce, David Denkenberger To cite this version: Joshua Pearce, David Denkenberger. A National Pragmatic Safety Limit for Nuclear Weapon Quan- tities. Drug Safety, Springer Verlag, 2018, 4 (2), pp.25. 10.3390/safety4020025. hal-02111370 HAL Id: hal-02111370 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02111370 Submitted on 26 Apr 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License safety Article A National Pragmatic Safety Limit for Nuclear Weapon Quantities Joshua M. Pearce 1,2,3,* ID and David C. Denkenberger 4,5 1 Department of Electronics and Nanoengineering, School of Electrical Engineering, Aalto University, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland 2 Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931-1295, USA 3 Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931-1295, USA 4 Tennessee State University, 3500 John A Merritt Boulevard Nashville, Nashville, TN 37209, USA; [email protected] 5 Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disasters (ALLFED), 23532 Calabasas Road, Suite A, Calabasas, CA 91302, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: 906-487-1466 Received: 15 February 2018; Accepted: 6 June 2018; Published: 14 June 2018 Abstract: This study determines the nuclear pragmatic limit where the direct physical negative consequences of nuclear weapons use are counter to national interests, by assuming all unknowns are conservatively optimistic.
    [Show full text]
  • Suomalaisian__K__Kulmia Netti.Pdf
    Maanpuolustuskorkeakoulu Strategian laitos Sivonen (toim.) Sivonen Suomalaisia näkökulmia Suomalaisia näkökulmia strategian tutkimukseen strategian tutkimukseen Strategian tutkimus on osa sotatieteellistä, mutta myös kansainvälisen Toimittanut: Pekka Sivonen strate politiikan tutkimuksen tiedeyhteisöä. Strategian tutkimuksen ja Suomalaisia näkökulmia opetuksen ainoa yliopistollinen laitos maassamme on puolustusvoimiin Julkaisusarja 1 | Strategian tutkimuksia No 33 kuuluvan Maanpuolustuskorkeakoulun Strategian laitos. Vuonna 2015 se yhdistetään Maanpuolustuskorkeakoulun Taktiikan ja Sota- gi historian laitosten kanssa Sotataidon laitokseksi, jonka puitteissa an tutkimukseen strategia jatkaa itsenäisenä tieteenalana ja oppiaineena. Käsillä oleva kokoomateos on tarkoitettu strategian alan perus- oppikirjaksi, mutta samalla se on suunnattu myös yleisesti kan- sainvälisestä turvallisuudesta ja sen tutkimuksesta kiinnostuneelle lukijakunnalle. Teos esittelee sekä perinteisistä lähtökohdista nousevia että uudempiin virtauksiin kiinnittyviä lähestymistapoja strategian tutkimukseen. Teoksen alkupuolella painottuvat tutkimuksen teoreettis-metodologiset kysymykset, jälkipuolella puolestaan tutkimuksen empiiriset kohdealueet. Julkaisusarja 1 | No 33, 2013 Maanpuolustuskorkeakoulu Tel. +358 299 530632 ISBN 978-951-25-2495-2 Strategian laitos Fax. +358 299 530634 ISBN 978-951-25-2496-9 (PDF) PL 266, 00171 Helsinki strategianlaitos@mil.fi ISSN 1236-4959 Suomi, Finland www.mpkk.fi MAANPUOLUSTUSKORKEAKOULU STRATEGIAN LAITOS JULKAISUSARJA 1: STRATEGIAN TUTKIMUKSIA
    [Show full text]
  • President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 81) at the Gerald R
    Scanned from the President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 81) at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE WITHD AWAL SHEET (PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES FOAM OF DATE RESTR ICTION DOCUMENT CORRESPONDENTS OR TITLE Li 5-t" I\ p p~nJ. i ~ E 4 / /'). /7~ C ((ed.act~J C:OPj at/a Ii ahl.e j r'l Dpen r;;Ie.) RESTRICTION CODES I ( (A) Closa:! by Executive Order 12356 governing access to national securi\y information. iSI Closed by statute or by the agency which originated the docuroont. IC) Closed In ilCCordance with restrictions contained in the donor's deed of gift. THE WHITE HOUSE THE DAILY DIARY OF PRESIDENT GERALD R. FORD PLACE DAY BEGAN DATE (Mo., Day, Yr.) THE WHITE HOUSE APRIL 12, 1976 WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME DAY 7:10 a.m. MONDAY PHONE I--­ TIME il ." ;j '" ACTIVITY 0: :.:" II II In Out "­ Of. 7:10 The President had breakfast. 7:36 The President went to the doctor's office. 7:40 The President went to the Oval Office. 8:00 The President went to the Roosevelt Room. 8:00 8:20 The President participated in a White House senior staff meeting. For a list of attendees, see APPENDIX "A." 8:20 The President returned to the Oval Office. 8:35 8:55 The President met with his Assistant, Richard B. Cheney. 9:20 10:30 The President met with: Henry A. Kissinger, Secretary of State Lt. Gen. Brent Scowcroft, Assistant for National Security Affairs The President met with: 10 :30 11 :20 Robert T.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Empire
    2013 Engineering Empire: An Introduction to the Intellectuals and Institutions of American Imperialism in the Age of Obama Engineering Empire: An Introduction to the Intellectuals and Institutions of American Imperialism in the Age of Obama A 2013 Hampton Institute report by Andrew Gavin Marshall Hampton Institute a proletarian think tank www.hamptonthink.org 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEERING EMPIRE ……………………………. 3 Meet the Engineers of Empire …… 4 Dynastic Influence on Foreign Policy …. 5 Intellectuals, 'Experts,' and Imperialists Par Excellence: Kissinger and Brzezinski ……. 8 From Cold War to New World Order: 'Containment' to 'Enlargement' …. 11 The Road to "Hope" and "Change" …. 16 CSIS: The 'Brain' of the Obama Administration … 18 Imperialism Without Imperialists? ….. 25 Notes …. 26 EMPIRE UNDER OBAMA, PART 1: POLITICAL LANGUAGE AND THE ‘MAFIA PRINCIPLES’ OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS ……. 30 Mafia Principles and Western 'Values' …. 33 Notes …. 39 EMPIRE UNDER OBAMA, PART 2: BARACK OBAMA’S GLOBAL TERROR CAMPAIGN … 41 Notes … 48 EMPIRE UNDER OBAMA, PART 3: AMERICA’S “SECRET WARS” IN OVER 100 COUNTRIES AROUND THE WORLD ……. 51 Notes …. 57 EMPIRE UNDER OBAMA, PART 4: COUNTERINSURGENCY, DEATH SQUADS, AND THE POPULATION AS A TARGET …… 60 Notes …. 68 2 Educating yourself about empire can be a challenging endeavor, especially since so much of the educational system is dedicated to avoiding the topic or justifying the actions of imperialism in the modern era. If one studies political science or economics, the subject might be discussed in a historical context, but rarely as a modern reality; media and government voices rarely speak on the subject, and even more rarely speak of it with direct and honest language.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Security Council: an Organizational Assessment
    The National Security Council: An Organizational Assessment Richard A. Best Jr. Specialist in National Defense December 28, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30840 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress The National Security Council: An Organizational Assessment Summary The National Security Council (NSC) was established by statute in 1947 to create an inter- departmental body to advise the President with respect to the integration of domestic, foreign, and military policies relating to the national security so as to enable the military services and the other departments and agencies of the Government to cooperate more effectively in matters involving the national security. Currently, statutory members of the Council are the President, Vice President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Defense, and, since 2007, the Secretary of Energy; but, at the President’s request, other senior officials participate in NSC deliberations. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Director of National Intelligence are statutory advisers. The President clearly holds final decision-making authority in the executive branch. Over the years, however, the NSC staff has emerged as a major factor in the formulation (and at times in the implementation) of national security policy. Similarly, the head of the NSC staff, the National Security Adviser, has played important, and occasionally highly public, roles in policymaking. This report traces the evolution of the NSC from its creation to the present. The organization and influence of the NSC have varied significantly from one Administration to another, ranging from highly structured and formal systems to loose-knit teams of experts.
    [Show full text]