Baltic Security Co-Operation: a Way Ahead

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Baltic Security Co-Operation: a Way Ahead Baltic Defence Review No. 3 Volume 2000 Baltic Security Co-operation: a Way Ahead By Eitvydas Bajarûnas, Head of Foreign Policy Planning, MFA, Lithuania1 to appraise the main security challenges will benefit more if we are successful in Introduction of the Baltic Sea region, to examine cur- overcoming these old patterns and replace rent accomplishments of the three Baltic them with new habits of cooperation. Many outside observers recognize countries in their security cooperation That is a most elegant expression valid achievements of Estonia, Latvia and and, in that respect, to project major fu- even today. Lithuania - which celebrate 10 years of ture tasks. Indeed, viewed from the historical per- the restored independence - in implement- spective, the Baltic Sea region has experi- ing democracy, establishing functioning What is the Baltic enced a turbulent history where major free market economy, and engaging into security agenda? European powers - Russia (in the last cen- the wider world international co-opera- tury the Soviet Union), Germany and tion. Baltic foreign and security policies Assessing the security situation of the others - have regularly tried to exercise contributed to making them stand for Baltic countries U.S. Secretary of State M. strategic and ideological influence. stability, openness, dynamic development Albright in her speech in Vilnius in July Through out history fundamental rights and ability to cope with the many chal- 1997 presented it in such way: ... per- have been ignored. The smaller countries lenges of globalization. Commemoration haps no part of Europe has suffered more in the region have suffered dispropor- of a decade of a successful return to the from the old pattern of geopolitics than tionately through repeated occupation global community marks the right time the Baltic states ... and no part of Europe and oppression by their larger neighbors. 43 Baltic Defence Review No. 3 Volume 2000 For centuries they have found themselves offers the world-market excellent trade approach to an undivided Europe. A sig- in a gray zone of uncertainty, governed opportunities, a good climate of foreign nificant factor here is the present day by power not by principles of law or investments, transit routes, and a steadily Russias involvement in partnership rela- moral. growing network of international, gov- tionship with the Western institutions. The peace treaties of 1920 between the ernmental and non-governmental arrange- The U.S. and the EU are key players in Baltic countries and Russia were the first ments. the Baltic Sea region. Other countries in signs of Russias acceptance of their sov- The region has enormous potential, the region - Nordic, Poland, and Germany ereignty, although it never reconciled it- given the 90 millions people who live - also have great interests in the stability self with the loss of the Baltic countries. there, with rich natural and human re- of the area. The Soviet Russia occupied the three sources and excellent transit opportuni- Indeed, the Baltic Sea region might be countries in 1939, after Hitler donated ties. It has an investment conducive envi- considered as one of the most expanding them to Stalin in the secret Molotov- ronment, a highly skilled labor force, and regions in Europe and after the Baltic and Ribbentrop pact. The Yalta meeting of is hi-tech oriented. Polish membership in EU, the region will 1945 became a funeral for Baltic independ- The fall of the Soviet Union and other be able to reveal its entire potential. Four ence. During the Cold War the dividing totalitarian regimes in the East, the unifi- EU members Denmark, Germany, Fin- line of Europe went across the Baltic Sea cation of Germany, restoration of inde- land and Sweden - border the Baltic Sea, region, which became a strategic backwa- pendence of the Baltic countries, Finish four others - Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania ter that received little focus on interna- and Swedish membership in the EU and and Poland - are on the road to accede tional agendas. the Polish membership of NATO, fol- the Union and it is only a question of However, since the end of the Cold lowed by continuing European and Trans- time when it happens. Finally, Russia is War, the region has become an impor- atlantic integration processes all provide in a partnership and co-operation arrange- tant focal point where U.S., EUs and unique opportunities for creating stabil- ment with EU (although limited because Russias policies are intercrossed. There is ity and well-being around the Baltic Sea. of continued Chechen war) and declares a widespread understanding that the Bal- The Baltic region has become a labora- its intention to expand her relationship tic Sea region is one of the most dynami- tory example to other parts of Europe with the Union. For these reasons the cally developing, outward-looking and for promoting closer regional coopera- Baltic Sea has been called a future inner promising regions in Europe. The region tion, and as a test case for the Western EU lake. 44 Baltic Defence Review No. 3 Volume 2000 Today, only one decade after the end nority rights and settle their disputes challenges, ambiguity and certain insta- of the Cold War and the restored inde- peacefully. bility of a wider scope that still character- pendence of the Baltic countries, the is- The Baltic Sea region today appears to ize the region, to notice if distrust, which sues of the zones of influence, boundary be safe from destructive forces that could may come to us from the past, still domi- disputes, ethnic hatred and other past cause tension among its states and for the nates relationships, if asymmetrical balance problems have become irrelevant on the moment traditional military security is of capability still remain a source of ten- security agendas of the Baltic Region. In- less relevant in this region. Problems, sions - is it possible that a Cold war type deed, immediately after the collapse of the which dominated agendas in the first years of conflict again can become pertinent in Berlin Wall, there were many warnings that of independence the presence of Rus- the regional context? the end of the old socialist system might sian troops on the soil of the Baltic coun- These are more theoretical questions, revitalize old hatreds in Central and East- tries, a high degree of militarization in but there are many practical issues as the ern Europe. For 40 years communism had the Baltic neighborhood, tensions due to economic security, enlargement of both suppressed ethnic nationalism, frontier unsolved minority and human rights is- the EU and NATO, regional cooperation disputes and minority discontents. Today sues in Estonia and Latvia, unilateral de- and neighborhood issues, including Rus- we can see that none of these evils has pendency from the Eastern energy sup- sia and its Kaliningrad region, the U.S. come to pass - with the exception of Cau- ply etc. no longer dominate the secu- presence and the wider security context. casus, some parts in Central Asia and rity agendas. The type of tension most Finally, not all states in the region en- Western Balkans. Everywhere else minor- likely to occur in the Baltic is not a mili- joy an equal sense of security status. ity rights have been guaranteed and exist- tary threat, but rather the highly charged, Neighbors of the three Baltic countries - ing borders were either reaffirmed or tense political situation which could turn Nordic countries - are solidly integrated changed by consent. This extraordinary into violent actions, extremist group ac- both internally and with the rest of Eu- success is above all due to the enlargement tions, drug trafficking, smuggling, illegal rope. Presently many outsiders still regard processes of the EU and NATO to the migration etc. the case of the Baltic trio as somewhat East. It has promised prosperity and sta- But even these threats are regarded as different. Although a joined community bility to potential new members in re- manageable within the existing institu- of sovereign countries, institutionally and turn for their willingness to carry tions and cooperative structures. More mentally they are still apart. This pattern through market reforms, protect mi- important is to detect what elements of of ambiguity shows that further reflec- 45 Baltic Defence Review No. 3 Volume 2000 tion is needed on the place and functions kept under totalitarian regimes or dur- That is why it is of crucial importance of the Baltic security cooperation. ing the short prewar period of independ- for the EU to continue the enlargement ence fluctuating in between the East and process. EU, unfortunately, is badly con- Enlargement of West, the Baltic countries in case of EU flicted on the issue of expanding the the European Union membership would for the forthcoming Union-membership. Some countries, e.g. years be earmarked as a constituent part Germany, would like EU membership for One can say that what is happening in of the democratic West. some of its eastern neighbors, but is con- the enlargement process of the EU is that Indeed, the Baltics as well as other cerned about the free movement of east- Europe is returning to where it belongs, countries membership in the EU will have ern workers into Germany and illegal to its original sites, from which it had to a positive impact on the stability in the immigrants. EU politicians also shrink withdraw temporarily. Membership in the region and will be beneficial to its from farm-subsidy reforms regarded as EU is a precondition for modernization neighbors. Baltic Sea states regional co- necessary if the EU is to bear the cost of of the Baltic countries economies and operation, particularly among the states the entry of heavily agricultural states. societies as well as for fully-fledged par- of the Baltic Sea, Latvia and Estonia, as Be as it is the EU has already started its ticipation in the international commu- well as the strategic partnership with Po- journey towards the Baltics.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2 Introduction: the Enigmatic Zukertort
    Chapter 2 Introduction: The Enigmatic Zukertort The Zukertort is a symphony of irony. Why do you say that? Well, to begin at the beginning, in his annotations to the oft-quoted seminal game on his opening, Zukertort v. Black- burne 1883, Zukertort wrote that he planned to play the whole game on the Q-side. Now players typically think of the system as one long, prepared attack on the enemy’s King. Secondly, the opening is called the “Colle-Zukertort,” even though Colle practically never played it. In fact, in my own personal data- base I have many hundreds of games where Colle played what is now known as the “Colle-Koltanowski,” but not a single game where he played the Zukertort except when his opponent used the Queen’s Indian Defense. Thirdly, it is unclear why the Colle-Koltanowski and the Colle-Zukertort are so often put in the same book. We do not see books for Black containing in-depth coverage of both the Dragon and Najdorf variations of the Sicilian. We do not see repertoire books for White going deeply into both the Botvin- nik and Meran variations of the Semi-slav. Why package these two very different systems in the same text? The Enigmatic Zukertort Fourthly, a thorough inves- very much different than he tigation of the Zukertort will can if he castles early (as we show that it appears to have shall see). no real mainline! Or, rather, I would suggest the stu- its “mainline” is so tactically dent understand the Zuker- different than most of its tort as an opening in which other lines that it is hard to White presents Black the same say whether it is the mainline choice given to the protago- of the system or a popular nists at the end of the movie deviation! Ghostbusters.
    [Show full text]
  • Taming Wild Chess Openings
    Taming Wild Chess Openings How to deal with the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly over the chess board By International Master John Watson & FIDE Master Eric Schiller New In Chess 2015 1 Contents Explanation of Symbols ���������������������������������������������������������������� 8 Icons ��������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 9 Introduction �������������������������������������������������������������������������� 10 BAD WHITE OPENINGS ��������������������������������������������������������������� 18 Halloween Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.♘f3 ♘c6 3.♘c3 ♘f6 4.♘xe5 ♘xe5 5.d4 . 18 Grünfeld Defense: The Gibbon: 1.d4 ♘f6 2.c4 g6 3.♘c3 d5 4.g4 . 20 Grob Attack: 1.g4 . 21 English Wing Gambit: 1.c4 c5 2.b4 . 25 French Defense: Orthoschnapp Gambit: 1.e4 e6 2.c4 d5 3.cxd5 exd5 4.♕b3 . 27 Benko Gambit: The Mutkin: 1.d4 ♘f6 2.c4 c5 3.d5 b5 4.g4 . 28 Zilbermints - Benoni Gambit: 1.d4 c5 2.b4 . 29 Boden-Kieseritzky Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.♘f3 ♘c6 3.♗c4 ♘f6 4.♘c3 ♘xe4 5.0-0 . 31 Drunken Hippo Formation: 1.a3 e5 2.b3 d5 3.c3 c5 4.d3 ♘c6 5.e3 ♘e7 6.f3 g6 7.g3 . 33 Kadas Opening: 1.h4 . 35 Cochrane Gambit 1: 5.♗c4 and 5.♘c3 . 37 Cochrane Gambit 2: 5.d4 Main Line: 1.e4 e5 2.♘f3 ♘f6 3.♘xe5 d6 4.♘xf7 ♔xf7 5.d4 . 40 Nimzowitsch Defense: Wheeler Gambit: 1.e4 ♘c6 2.b4 . 43 BAD BLACK OPENINGS ��������������������������������������������������������������� 44 Khan Gambit: 1.e4 e5 2.♗c4 d5 . 44 King’s Gambit: Nordwalde Variation: 1.e4 e5 2.f4 ♕f6 . 45 King’s Gambit: Sénéchaud Countergambit: 1.e4 e5 2.f4 ♗c5 3.♘f3 g5 .
    [Show full text]
  • Chess Openings
    Chess Openings PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:50:30 UTC Contents Articles Overview 1 Chess opening 1 e4 Openings 25 King's Pawn Game 25 Open Game 29 Semi-Open Game 32 e4 Openings – King's Knight Openings 36 King's Knight Opening 36 Ruy Lopez 38 Ruy Lopez, Exchange Variation 57 Italian Game 60 Hungarian Defense 63 Two Knights Defense 65 Fried Liver Attack 71 Giuoco Piano 73 Evans Gambit 78 Italian Gambit 82 Irish Gambit 83 Jerome Gambit 85 Blackburne Shilling Gambit 88 Scotch Game 90 Ponziani Opening 96 Inverted Hungarian Opening 102 Konstantinopolsky Opening 104 Three Knights Opening 105 Four Knights Game 107 Halloween Gambit 111 Philidor Defence 115 Elephant Gambit 119 Damiano Defence 122 Greco Defence 125 Gunderam Defense 127 Latvian Gambit 129 Rousseau Gambit 133 Petrov's Defence 136 e4 Openings – Sicilian Defence 140 Sicilian Defence 140 Sicilian Defence, Alapin Variation 159 Sicilian Defence, Dragon Variation 163 Sicilian Defence, Accelerated Dragon 169 Sicilian, Dragon, Yugoslav attack, 9.Bc4 172 Sicilian Defence, Najdorf Variation 175 Sicilian Defence, Scheveningen Variation 181 Chekhover Sicilian 185 Wing Gambit 187 Smith-Morra Gambit 189 e4 Openings – Other variations 192 Bishop's Opening 192 Portuguese Opening 198 King's Gambit 200 Fischer Defense 206 Falkbeer Countergambit 208 Rice Gambit 210 Center Game 212 Danish Gambit 214 Lopez Opening 218 Napoleon Opening 219 Parham Attack 221 Vienna Game 224 Frankenstein-Dracula Variation 228 Alapin's Opening 231 French Defence 232 Caro-Kann Defence 245 Pirc Defence 256 Pirc Defence, Austrian Attack 261 Balogh Defense 263 Scandinavian Defense 265 Nimzowitsch Defence 269 Alekhine's Defence 271 Modern Defense 279 Monkey's Bum 282 Owen's Defence 285 St.
    [Show full text]
  • STRATEGIC FORUM National Defense University
    January 2020 STRATEGIC FORUM National Defense University About the Authors Håkon Lunde Saxi, Ph.D., is an As- Baltics Left of Bang: Nordic sociate Professor at the Norwegian Defence University College. Bengt Total Defense and Implications Sundelius is a Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the Swedish Defense University. Brett Swaney is an for the Baltic Sea Region Assistant Research Fellow in the Center for Strategic Research, Institute for Na- tional Strategic Studies, at the National by Håkon Lunde Saxi, Bengt Sundelius, and Brett Defense University. Swaney Key Points ponsored by the U.S. National Defense University (NDU) and the Swed- ish National Defense University, this paper is the second in a series of ◆◆ Nordic states (Norway, Sweden, and Finland) efforts to enhance Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Forums dedicated to societal resilience through unique the multinational exploration of the strategic and defense challenges faced by “total defense” and “comprehen- S sive security” initiatives are unlikely the Baltic states. The December 2017 U.S. National Security Strategy described to change the near-term strategic Russia as “using subversive measures to weaken the credibility of America’s com- calculus of Russia. Over time, how- ever, a concerted application of to- mitment to Europe, undermine transatlantic unity, and weaken European insti- tal defense in harmony with Article tutions and governments.”1 The U.S. and European authors of this paper, along 3 of the North Atlantic Treaty will with many others, came together in late 2017 to explore possible responses to aid in the resilience to, and deter- rence of, Russian hostile measures the security challenges facing the Baltic Sea Region (BSR).
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Security and Defence Review 2013
    Baltic Security and Defence Review ________________________________________________________ Volume 15, Issue 2 2013 Baltic Security and Defence Review is the bi-annual publication of the Baltic Defence College © 2013, Baltic Defence College, All rights reserved ISSN 1736-3772 (print) 1736-3780 (online) Editorial Board Editor: Dr. James S. Corum, Dean, Baltic Defence College Deputy editor Mr. James Rogers, Baltic Defence College Harold E. Raugh, Jr., Ph.D. Command Historian, V Corps Lt. Col. John Andreas Olsen PhD, Norwegian Air Force, Dean, Norwegian Defence University College Dr. Augustine Meaher, Department of Political and Strategic Studies, Baltic Defence College Dr. Hannu Kari, Finnish National Defence University Dr. Maja Ericksson, Swedish National Defence Academy Erik Mannik, International Centre for Defence Studies Dr. Olaf Mertelsmann, Tartu University Dr. Margarita Seselgyte, Vilnius University Lithuania Dr. Zaneta Ozolina, University of Latvia Layout: Oliver Toots Cover and print: www.ecoprint.ee Electronic version of the Baltic Security and Defence Review can be accessed on the website of the Baltic Defence College at www.bdcol.ee All articles of the Baltic Security and Defence Review are also available through the International Relations and Security Network (ISN) at www.isn.ethz.ch All inquiries should be made to the Baltic Defence College, Riia 12, 51013 Tartu, Estonia, ph: +372 717 6000, fax: +372 717 6050, e-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer: The Baltic Defence College publishes the Baltic Security and Defence Review as
    [Show full text]
  • Deterring Russian Aggression in the Baltic States Through Resilience and Resistance
    Research Report C O R P O R A T I O N STEPHEN J. FLANAGAN, JAN OSBURG, ANIKA BINNENDIJK, MARTA KEPE, ANDREW RADIN Deterring Russian Aggression in the Baltic States Through Resilience and Resistance Introduction The governments and citizens of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania—the Baltic states—are subject to daily Russian strategic information operations and propaganda activities that are part of campaigns designed to undermine trust in their institutions, foment ethnic and social tensions, and erode confidence in North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) KEY FINDINGS collective defense commit- ■ Total Defense and Unconventional Warfare (TD/UW) techniques and ments. These three countries forces can support deterrence, early warning, de-escalation, defense are also vulnerable to low-level, against invading forces, and liberation from occupation during the hybrid, and full-scale attacks by course of a hybrid or conventional conflict. Russian special operations and ■ Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are committed to enhancing the size and regular military forces deployed capabilities of their national guards and reserve forces and increasing close to their borders. In light whole-of society resilience and resistance efforts. All three countries of these concerns, and given are improving and expanding their small special operations forces. the imbalance between Russian ■ The United States, other NATO allies and partners, and the European and NATO conventional forces Union could take further concrete steps to support the development deployed in the Baltic region, of Baltic TD/UW capabilities by strengthening cooperation on crisis these governments and others management, intelligence sharing, civilian resilience, and countering Russian information warfare and hybrid attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Sea Security Regional and Sectoral Perspectives ______
    Baltic Sea Security Regional and Sectoral Perspectives ______________________________________ Olevs Nikers and Otto Tabuns, editors Washington, DC May 2021 THE JAMESTOWN FOUNDATION Published in the United States by The Jamestown Foundation 1310 L Street NW Suite 810 Washington, DC 20005 http://www.jamestown.org Copyright © 2021 The Jamestown Foundation All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written consent. For copyright and permissions information, contact The Jamestown Foundation, 1310 L Street NW, Suite 810, Washington, DC 20005. The publication is a product of the Baltic Sea Security Initiative. The Initiative was made possible by funding from the Baltic-American Freedom Foundation (BAFF). For more information about BAFF scholarships and speaker support, visit balticamericanfreedomfoundation.org. The Initiative was also supported by The Jamestown Foundation, the Latvian Political Science Association, and the Baltic Security Foundation. The views expressed in the book are those of the contributors and not necessarily those of The Jamestown Foundation or any other organization or government. For more information on this book of The Jamestown Foundation, email [email protected]. ISBN: 978-1-7352752-0-8 Cover art provided by Peggy Archambault of Peggy Archambault Design, archdesign1.com. Jamestown’s Mission The Jamestown Foundation’s mission is to inform and educate policy makers and the broader community about events and trends in those societies which are strategically or tactically important to the United States and which frequently restrict access to such information. Utilizing indigenous and primary sources, Jamestown’s material is delivered without political bias, filter or agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 15, Issue 2 2013
    Baltic Security and Defence Review ________________________________________________________ Volume 15, Issue 2 2013 Baltic Security and Defence Review is the bi-annual publication of the Baltic Defence College © 2013, Baltic Defence College, All rights reserved ISSN 1736-3772 (print) 1736-3780 (online) Editorial Board Editor: Dr. James S. Corum, Dean, Baltic Defence College Deputy editor Mr. James Rogers, Baltic Defence College Harold E. Raugh, Jr., Ph.D. Command Historian, V Corps Lt. Col. John Andreas Olsen PhD, Norwegian Air Force, Dean, Norwegian Defence University College Dr. Augustine Meaher, Department of Political and Strategic Studies, Baltic Defence College Dr. Hannu Kari, Finnish National Defence University Dr. Maja Ericksson, Swedish National Defence Academy Erik Mannik, International Centre for Defence Studies Dr. Olaf Mertelsmann, Tartu University Dr. Margarita Seselgyte, Vilnius University Lithuania Dr. Zaneta Ozolina, University of Latvia Layout: Oliver Toots Cover and print: www.ecoprint.ee Electronic version of the Baltic Security and Defence Review can be accessed on the website of the Baltic Defence College at www.bdcol.ee All articles of the Baltic Security and Defence Review are also available through the International Relations and Security Network (ISN) at www.isn.ethz.ch All inquiries should be made to the Baltic Defence College, Riia 12, 51013 Tartu, Estonia, ph: +372 717 6000, fax: +372 717 6050, e-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer: The Baltic Defence College publishes the Baltic Security and Defence Review as
    [Show full text]
  • Georgian Lessons Georgian Georgian Lessons Conflicting Russian and Western Interests
    Georgian Lessons Georgian Lessons Conflicting Russian and Western Interests in the Wider Europe A Report of the CSIS New European Democracies Project and the Lavrentis Lavrentiadis Chair in Southeast European Studies 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 author Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Janusz Bugajski E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org Bugajski November 2010 ISBN 978-0-89206-606-3 CSIS CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & Ë|xHSKITCy066063zv*:+:!:+:! CSIS INTERNATIONAL STUDIES Georgian Lessons Conflicting Russian and Western Interests in the Wider Europe A Report of the CSIS New European Democracies Project and the Lavrentis Lavrentiadis Chair in Southeast European Studies author Janusz Bugajski November 2010 About CSIS In an era of ever-changing global opportunities and challenges, the Center for Strategic and Inter- national Studies (CSIS) provides strategic insights and practical policy solutions to decisionmak- ers. CSIS conducts research and analysis and develops policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke at the height of the Cold War, CSIS was dedicated to the simple but urgent goal of finding ways for America to survive as a nation and prosper as a people. Since 1962, CSIS has grown to become one of the world’s preeminent public policy institutions. Today, CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. More than 220 full-time staff and a large network of affiliated scholars focus their expertise on defense and security; on the world’s regions and the unique challenges inherent to them; and on the issues that know no boundary in an increasingly connected world.
    [Show full text]
  • September 1999
    M MONTANA C A CHESS ^ NEWS Volume 24, Issue 4 — September, 1999 Since 1935 Alex Dawson Wins State Championship When Alex Dawson made a great move, twenty thousand people cheered. When he checkmated his opponent, cannons fired in celebration. No, it was not a dream that the repeating State Champion had; it was the 1999 State Closed Championship, held in Missoula this year in competition with a home game of the Grizzlies just down the street. Dawson certainly made some moves worth cheering about, and all of them appear in the Recent Games section of this issue of MCN. It was his fifth championship title, and his third unshared title, tying him with Greg Nowak for most solo championships in Montana history. He won four games, (including one against the Octopus himself), and only Thad Suits was able to nick him for a draw. Nowak had what for him must qualiiy as a rough tournament, losing two games for the first time in ages. Besides the loss taDawson, he was the victim of a first roimd upset at the hands of Sherwood Moore. For his part, Sherwood Moore took clear second place after only barely qualifying as an eleventh hour substitute. Dark horses lake note: Outgoing co-champ Les Brennan was also a last-minute sub the year he won. Special congratulations are owed Sherwood since on the way to his 3.5 points he took the early lead in the Upset Derby (430 points), and he also broke into class A for the first time in his career. With State Open winner David Duke having to bow out, Howard Hoene was left as the lone representative fi-om Billings, and he also fared well.
    [Show full text]
  • Chameleon Variation
    The Chameleon Variation Confronting the Sicilian on Your Own Terms Carsten Hansen Foreword by Andy Soltis 2017 Russell Enterprises, Inc. Milford, CT USA 1 1 The Chameleon Variation Confronting the Sicilian on Your Own Terms by Carsten Hansen ISBN: 978-1-941270-86-8 (print) ISBN: 978-1-941270-87-5 (eBook) © Copyright 2017 Carsten Hansen All Rights Reserved No part of this book may be used, reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any manner or form whatsoever or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the express written permission from the publisher except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. Published by: Russell Enterprises, Inc. P.O. Box 3131 Milford, CT 06460 USA http://www.russell-enterprises.com [email protected] Cover by Janel Lowrance Editing and proofreading by Alexey Root Printed in the United States of America 2 Table of Contents Foreword by Andy Soltis 6 Chapter 1 Ideas 9 Chapter 2 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nge2 e5 12 4...b5 12 4...g6 13 4...Nce7 14 4...Nge7 16 Chapter 3 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nge2 Nf6 4.g3 d5 21 5...Nxd5 21 6...e6 21 6...Nc7 23 6...Nxc3 25 6...Be6 29 6...Nf6 31 5...Nd4!? 33 6.Bg2 Bg4 7.h3 33 6.Nxd4 cxd4 7.Nb5 35 Chapter 4 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nge2 e6 4.g3 Nf6 40 Chapter 5 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nge2 e6 4.g3 d5 48 Chapter 6 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nge2 Nd4 58 4.d3 61 4.Nxd4 cxd4 64 5.Nb5!? 65 5.Ne2 66 3 Chapter 7 1.e4 c5 2.Nc3 e6 3.Nge2 a6 4 g3 b5 with 6.0-0 72 6...b4 73 6...Nf6 75 7...d6 76 7...d5
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Role Nuclear Weapons Could Play in Deterring Russian Threats to the Baltic States
    Exploring the Role Nuclear Weapons Could Play in Deterring Russian Threats to the Baltic States Paul K. Davis, J. Michael Gilmore, David R. Frelinger, Edward Geist, Christopher K. Gilmore, Jenny Oberholtzer, Danielle C. Tarraf C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2781 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-1-9774-0215-8 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2019 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover: pavlofox/stock.adobe.com. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report assesses nonstrategic nuclear options for bolstering deter- rence capabilities in the Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania).
    [Show full text]