Hermann Gmeiner (1919–1986) – the Greatest Foster Father for More Than 2000 SOS Children’S Village Projects and Facilities
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Pedagogika Rodziny Family Pedagogy Family PedagogyPedagogikaFamily Rodziny Pedagogy Quartely 2(2)/2012 ISSN 2082-8411PedagogikaNrNr 1/20111(1)/2011 Rodziny ISSN 2082-8411 nr 1(1)/2011 Academy of Management Społeczna Wyższa Szkoła Przedsiębiorczości i Zarządzania Wersja drukowana czasopisma jest wersją referencyjną Redaktor naczelny prof. dr hab. Henryk Cudak Sekretarz redakcji dr Mariola Świderska Rada programowa prof. zw. dr hab. Aman�us Akimjak (Słowacja) prof. zw. dr hab. Józefa Brągiel prof. dr hab. Henryk Cudak (przewodniczący) prof. zw. dr hab. Arthur Ellis (USA) prof. zw. dr hab. Reinhard Golz (Niemcy) prof. zw. dr hab. Anna Kwak prof. zw. dr hab. Stanisław Kawula prof. zw. dr hab. Tadeusz Pilch prof. zw. dr hab. Andrzej Radziewicz-Winnicki prof. dr hab. Jan Rostowski prof. zw. dr hab. Łukasz Sułkowski dr Mariola Świderska (sekretarz) prof. zw. dr hab. Andrzej Michał de Tchorzewski prof. zw. dr hab. Mikołaj Winiarski prof. dr hab. Anna Żilova Redaktor naukowy numeru prof. dr hab. Henryk Cudak Kwartalnik jest recenzowany zgodnie z wymogami ministerialnymi Redakcja „Pedagogiki Rodziny. Family Pedagogy” Społeczna Wyższa Szkoła Przedsiębiorczości i Zarządzania ul. Sienkiewicza 9, 90–113 Łódź 42 664 66 21, e-mail: [email protected] © Copyright by Społeczna Akademia Nauk ISSN: 2082-8411 Skład i łamanie Ilona Marczak Projekt okładki Marcin Szadkowski Druk i oprawa Drukarnia „Green”, Plac Komuny Paryskiej 4, 90–007 Łódź 42 632 27 13, 0604 507 082, e-mail: [email protected] Wersja papierowa wydania jest wersją podstawową Table of contents Dissertations Henryk Cudak, The importance of educational culture of parents in children’s social adjustment .................................................................................................................................7 Ryszard Kucha, Hermann Gmeiner (1919–1986) – the Greatest Foster Father for More than 2000 SOS Children’s Village Projects and Facilities ..............................17 Veronika Žilová, Community nursing and health .............................................................31 Mariola Świderska, A Nursery School as an Institution Supporting Parents in Raising their Children ...............................................................................................................39 Sylwester Bębas, The meaning of love and faithfulness in the life of spouses .............55 Krystyna Ferenz, Women of two generations in modern family ....................................65 Marek Jan Kuciapiński, Extramural cultural institutions as a support for a families in the area of music activity development of young people .............................75 Grzegorz Ignatowski, The Role of the Family in Ecological Education .....................87 Alina Maria Basak, Influence of single-parent families on children’s development 95 Barbara Lulek, Earning emigration, unemployment and poverty. Family in the scope of social threats ........................................................................................................109 Nella Stolińska-Pobralska, Family Diagnostic and Consultation Centers as Institutions Supporting Courts and Families In Case of Maladjusted Minors ....... 127 Waldemar Basak, Alina Basak, The importance of social assistance for individuals and families in difficult life situations ............................................................139 Research findings Łukasz Sułkowski, Characteristics of Polish family SMEs ............................................153 Anna Žilová , Victimization in the school environment(Results of researches realized in some regions of Slovakia) ......................................................................................177 Sławomir Cudak, Child’s emotional relationship to his or her father after the divorce of parents ...........................................................................................................................187 Anna Žilová, Young people and cohabitation in marriage with a marriage certificate ...........................................................................................................................................197 Leokadia Wiatrowska, Parental tutoring as an expression of familial community ...................................................................................................................................... 205 Novotná Alena, Žilová Veronika, Birth rates and reproductive behaviour in the population of the Slovak Republic .............................................................................. 225 Anna Zilova, Anna Skokanova, Beata Akimjakova, Social care for psychosocially disabled juvenile girls in correctional establishments in the Slovak Republic ................................................................................................................ 233 Anna Žilová, Gender equality – factor supporting social inclusionin Slovakia..... 241 Ewa Przygońska, Family as a basic social unit responsible for children’s participation in culture................................................................................................................251 Alena Novotná, Social Relations of Voluntarily Modest People .................................. 265 Veronika Žilová, Risks of Social Exclusion in Connection with Natality and Nuptiality in Slovakia after 1990 ................................................................................. 269 International project Adam Gogacz, The DISTINC Project as an Example of Building New Europe, or New World by Inclusion in Education and Upbringing ............................................281 Career guidance and tutorial actions in the educational framework in Catalonia ................................................................................................................................... 289 Jūratė Murinienė, Career guidance services for school students in Lithuania ........ 295 Disserta�ons Family Pedagogy. Pedagogika Rodziny No. 2(2)/2012, pp. 7–16 Henryk Cudak Academy of Management in Lodz, Poland The importance of educa�onal culture of parents in children’s social adjustment 1. Introduc�on A family constitutes the social environment which may be characterized by the optimal conditions to provide values , norms of behaviour, general culture, social adaptation of human groups for their children. As Z. Tyszka (2003) rightly argues, a family in the opinion of Polish society occupies a leading position in the hierarchy of values. Despite such a high place, a modern family as a member community and an educational institution experiences various crisis situations that may interfere with development as well as emotional, social and axiological spheres of children and adolescents. Behavioural problems, social dysfunctions of family and children lie in the microstructure of the family and the surrounding environment and they result mainly from low-pedagogical culture of their parents. The elements of family life that undermine parents’ educational awarenes level are: a lack of pedagogical knowledge of parents on upbringing and development of children, too poor ability to proper organization of family life, lack of educational - caring skills, limited responsibility of parents for upbringing and socialization of their children (Cudak, 2011). The daily interactions of family life are usually spontaneous, involuntary, purposeless and unplanned - they come without teaching thought of their parents. Hence, they may interfere with normal behaviour, they may devaluate the values of social and family life, and they may surpass the accepted positive role models of cooperation in social groups. Unconscious parental actions can cause dysfunctions in the family, which result in emotional, social and moral hazards. These negative social phenomena are accompanied with conflicts, verbal aggression, physical and psychological violence, stress as well as tense and nervous atmosphere of home life. This state of family dysfunction, which is often on the verge of social pathology, directly contributes to the educational, caring and socialization risks of children and adolescents. 8 Henryk Cudak 2. Dysfunc�onal behaviour of children and adolescents and their family circumstances The phenomenon of social pathology and behavioural dysfunction in children and adolescents can be more clearly seen in the various peer groups, at school, local and family environment. Their negative behaviours evoke more or less social damages causing emotional, functional and axiological threats in structures of human life. As a rule, these malfunctions in social behaviours are accompanied by active conflicts, pathologies, an aggression in interpersonal interactions, violence against vulnerable individuals and groups of youth, hatred and hostility towards others, a lack of internal control, self-awareness and understanding in the local, school and peers’ community. Dysfunctions in behaviours of children and adolescents can be defined as negative attitudes towards the system of individuals, social groups, society, approval of values and patterns of behaviour, recognized in the community as illegal behaviour and designed to encourage anti-social conduct of individuals causing damage and harm to another person, a peer group or a family. The severity of educational dysfunction or social pathology in children and adolescents may occur in the form of: - a slight degree of disturbances in behaviour, - a significant level of severity of pathology in social behaviour. The first form – slight degree – of behavioural dysfunction