Carchaeology
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Stage 1 Background Study PartStage of 1Lots and 14Stage and 215, Archaeological Concession 2, Assessment Geographic Township of McClintock,ThreeStage Culvert 1 and now Replacements Stage the Township2 Archaeological along of Algonquin Highway Assessment 7 Highlands, Haliburton CountyPartThree of Lot Culvert 3, Concession Replacements 3 (23200070002) along Highway and 7 Part of Lot 4, Concession 5 (23200070005),Part of Lot 3, ConcessionGeographic 3 Township (23200070002) of Madoc, and PartHastings of Lot County 4, Concession and the 5 OriginalRoad(23200070005), ReportAllowance - July 19, between 2018 Geographic Lots Township26 and 27, of ConcessionMadoc, Hastings 4 (23300070046), County and the GeographicRoad Allowance Township between of Otonabee, Lots 26 andPeterborough 27, Concession County 4 (23300070046), ProjectGeographic #15841-2 Township of Otonabee, Peterborough County SubmittedProject to: #15841-2 StephanieORIGINAL Reed, REPORT P. Geo., CET ORIGINAL REPORT Project Manager CambiumMarch 14, 2017Inc. 52 HunterMarch Street14, 2017 East Peterborough, ON K9H 1G5 Submitted to: Ph: 705.742.7900Submitted to: x204 Scott Reynolds, B.Sc (Env), EP E: [email protected] Reynolds, B.Sc (Env), EP Environmental Planner Environmental Planner Ainley Group Ainley Group 45 South Front Street 45 South Front Street PIFBelleville, No.Belleville, P248-0318-2018 ON K8N ON K8N2Y5 2Y5 LauraPh: 613.966.4243Ph: McRae 613.966.4243 (License x105 x105 No. P248) E: [email protected]: [email protected] ThePIF CentralNo.PIF P248-0272-2016No. P248-0272-2016Archaeology Group Inc. LauraLaura McRae McRae (License (License No. No. P248) P248) 2401 5th Line East Campbellford, ON K0L 1L0 Ph:The 705.868.2697 CentralThe Central Archaeology Archaeology Group Group Inc. Inc. 2401 24015th Line 5th LineEast East Fax:Campbellford, 866.231.6071Campbellford, ON ONK0L K0L1L0 1L0 Phone: 705.201.1066 E:Phone: [email protected] 705.201.1066 Fax: 866.231.6071Fax: 866.231.6071 Email:Email: [email protected] [email protected] CAGI Project No. CAGI-2018-LM7 CAGI Project No. CAGI-2016-LM7 ReportCAGI Project in PDF No. CAGI-2016-LM7format distribution: Cambium Engineering. Township of Algonquin Highlands Report in PDF format distribution: Ainley Group Report in PDF format distribution: AinleyMinistry Group ofMinistry Transportation of Tourism, Culture and Sport MinistryMinistry of Transportationof Tourism, Culture and Sport Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport The Central Bringing the past TheC ARCHAEOLOGYCentral AARCHAEOLOGYGroup Inc. to the present AC G Group Inc. G for the future MCCLINTOCK LAGOON EXPANSION STAGE 1 BACKGROUND STUDY PROJECT PERSONNEL Project Director Laura McRae, P248 Client Contacts Stephanie Reeder, Cambium Inc. Archival Research Derek Paauw Fieldwork Laura McRae Derek Paauw Mapping Laura McRae Report Preparation Laura McRae Report Reviewer Derek Paauw Administration Deb Coit THE CENTRAL ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP INC. "i MCCLINTOCK LAGOON EXPANSION STAGE 1 BACKGROUND STUDY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Central Archaeology Group Inc. would like to extend their gratitude to the following individuals and parties: * Stephanie Reeder, Cambium Inc.. * Rob von Bitter, Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport. * The Haliburton County Land Registry Office. * The staff at the Trent University Maps and Geospatial Resources section of the Bata Library, Peterborough. ACRONYMS a.s.l. above sea level AP Archaeological Potential CI Cambium Inc. cm centimeter (s) CAGI Central Archaeology Group Inc. GToM Geographic Township of McClintock HC Haliburton County Hwy Highway km kilometre (s) m metre (s) MTCS Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport NAP No Archaeological Potential ToAL Township of Algonquin Highlands THE CENTRAL ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP INC. "ii MCCLINTOCK LAGOON EXPANSION STAGE 1 BACKGROUND STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Central Archaeology Group Inc. (CAGI) was retained by Cambium Inc. (CI) to conduct a Stage 1 background study on the proposed expansion of the McClintock Lagoon in the Township of Algonquin Highlands (ToAH), Haliburton County (HC). The purpose of this study therefore, is to provide a baseline level of data on known and potential cultural heritage resources within the subject property in order to inform future planning decisions regarding the study area. This study involved the examination of records such as historic settlement maps, land titles and documents, historical land use and ownership records, primary and secondary sources, and the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport’s archaeological sites database. This report also outlines the First Nations pre-contact and historic archaeological sequence, the Euro- Canadian historic settlement record for the area, physiography of the project area and determines archaeological potential based on the analysis of this information. Permission to access the area and to carry out the activities necessary for the completion of the Stage 1 background study was granted by Stephanie Reeder, CI. Based on the results of the archaeological assessment, the following recommendations are provided for consideration to the MTCS and the Proponent, and are subject to approval by the MTCS: 1) As no features of archaeological potential have been identified within the project area, no further archaeological assessment is recommended (as illustrated by the areas marked in yellow and blue on Map 10); 2) Should construction activities associated with this project extend beyond those areas assessed during this project, further archaeological investigation will be required prior to ground-disturbing activities. 3) Notwithstanding the results and recommendations presented in this study, The Central Archaeology Group Inc. notes that no archaeological assessment, no matter how thorough or carefully completed, can necessarily predict, account for, or identify every form of isolated or deeply buried archaeological deposit. Therefore, in the event that archaeological remains are found during subsequent construction and development activities, the consultant archaeologist, approval authority, and the Cultural Programs Unit of the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport should be immediately notified. The MTCS is requested to review, and provide a letter indicating their satisfaction with, the results and recommendations presented herein, with regard to the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists and the terms and conditions for archaeological licenses, and to enter this report into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports. THE CENTRAL ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP INC. "iii MCCLINTOCK LAGOON EXPANSION STAGE 1 BACKGROUND STUDY TABLE OF CONTENTS PROJECT PERSONNEL i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii ACRONYMS ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv 1.0 PROJECT CONTEXT 1 1.1 Objectives 1 1.2. Development Context 1 1.3 Historical Context 2 1.3.1 Historic Documentation 2 1.3.2 Pre-Contact Period 2 1.3.3 Post-Contact Period 10 1.3.4 Study Area History 13 1.3.5 Summary 13 1.4 Archaeological Context 14 1.4.1 Current Conditions 14 1.4.2 Physiography 14 1.4.3 Previous Archaeological Assessments 22 1.4.4 Registered Archaeological Sites 23 1.4.5 Historical Plaques 23 1.4.6 Summary 23 2.0 FIELD METHODS 24 3.0 ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS 26 3.1 Archaeological Potential 26 3.2 Archaeological Integrity 28 3.3 Conclusions 29 THE CENTRAL ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP INC. "iv MCCLINTOCK LAGOON EXPANSION STAGE 1 BACKGROUND STUDY 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS 30 5.0 ADVICE ON COMPLIANCE WITH LEGISLATION 31 6.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES 32 7.0 PLANS 41 8.0 MAPS 42 9.0 IMAGES 52 10.0 GLOSSARY OF TERMS 62 PLANS Plan 1 Conceptual site plan (provided by CI). 41 MAPS Map 1 Location of the project area. 42 Map 2 Historical atlas maps of Haliburton County from 1870 and 1908 43 (Ontario Genealogy 2016). Map 3 Meltwater outlets (Chapman and Putnam 1984). 44 Map 4 Terrestrial ecozones of Canada (Ecological Stratification Working 45 Group 1996). Map 5 Bedrock geology of the project and surrounding area (Ministry of 46 Northern Development and Mines 1991). Map 6 Surficial geology of the project and surrounding area (Ontario 47 Department of Mines and Northern Affairs 1972). Map 7 Soils of the project and surrounding area (Ontario Institute of 48 Pedology 1960). Map 8 Watersheds of Canada (Natural Resources Canada 2007). 49 Map 9 Site conditions. 50 Map 10 Archaeological potential. 51 THE CENTRAL ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP INC. "v MCCLINTOCK LAGOON EXPANSION STAGE 1 BACKGROUND STUDY IMAGES Image 1 Orthographic image of the project area (Google Earth 2016). 52 Image 2 Viewing southeast from the existing McClintock Lagoon. 53 Image 3 Viewing southwest into the existing McClintock Lagoon. 53 Image 4 Viewing southwest into the McClintock Lagoon. 54 Image 5 Viewing south. 54 Image 6 Viewing southwest. 55 Image 7 Viewing east. Note the exposed ground surface. Humus appears 55 very thin in this area. Image 8 Viewing southwest towards monitoring well TP107-16. 56 Image 9 Viewing northwest. 56 Image 10 Viewing southeast along Wes Clarke Trail. 57 Image 11 Viewing northeast. 57 Image 12 Viewing southeast. 58 Image 13 Viewing northwest along Wes Clarke Trail. 58 Image 14 Viewing east along Wes Clarke Trail. 59 Image 15 Viewing southwest. 59 Image 16 Viewing southwest along an unnamed trail. 60 Image 17 Viewing west. 60 Image 18 Viewing east. 61 Image 19 Viewing east. 61 TABLES Table 1 Summary of the First Nations archaeological sequence in southern Ontario. THE CENTRAL ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP INC. "vi MCCLINTOCK LAGOON EXPANSION STAGE 1 BACKGROUND STUDY Table 2 Major