DOCSLIB.ORG

Stages 1-3 Archaeological Assessment Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stages 1-3 Archaeological Assessment Of Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment for the Proposed Development of 5155 Mississauga Road Within Part of Lot 1, Concession 4 WHS In the Geographic Township of Toronto (New Survey) Historical County of Peel City of Mississauga Regional Municipality of Peel Ontario Project #: 053-MI1606-16 Licensee (#): Nimal Nithiyanantham (P390) PIF#: P390-0173-2016 Original Report April 29th, 2016 Presented to: City Park (Old Barber) Homes Inc. 950 Nashville Road Kleinburg, Ontario L0J 1C0 T: 905.552.5200 Prepared by: Archeoworks Inc. 16715-12 Yonge Street, Suite 1029 ARCHEOWORKS INC. Newmarket, Ontario L3X 1X4 T: 416.676.5597 F: 647.436.1938 STAGE 1-2 AA FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF BARBER HOUSE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA, R.M. OF PEEL, ONTARIO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Archeoworks Inc. was retained by City Park (Old Barber) Homes Inc. to conduct a Stage 1-2 AA in support of the proposed commercial and residential development of common element townhouses at municipal address 5155 Mississauga Road, which will herein be referred to as the “study area”. The study area is located within part Lot 1, Concession 4 West of Hurontario Street (WHS) (or Centre Street), in the Geographic Township of Toronto (New Survey), historical County of Peel, City of Mississauga, Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario The Stage 1 AA identified elevated potential for the recovery of archaeologically significant materials within the study area. Elevated archaeological potential was determined based on the close proximity (within 300 metres) of: historic structures, historic transportation routes, designated and listed cultural heritage resources, a cultural heritage landscape, a commemorative marker, a registered archaeological site and secondary water sources. During the Stage 2 AA, disturbances were encountered consisting of extant structures, paved driveways/parking areas, grading, underground utilities, and extensive landscaping. The remainder of the study area was subjected to a shovel test pit form of survey within areas of manicured grass at 10-metre intervals, which confirmed these areas were disturbed due to past grading and fill activities. No undisturbed deposits were encountered during the Stage 2 survey. Despite careful scrutiny, no archaeological resources were identified during the Stage 2 AA. Therefore, the study area may be considered free of further archaeological concern. In light of the study area testing negative for archaeological resources, the following recommendation is presented: 1. No further archaeological investigation is required for the study area. No construction/excavation activities shall take place within the study area prior to the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport (Archaeology Program Unit) confirming in writing that all archaeological licensing and technical review requirements have been satisfied. ARCHEOWORKS INC. i STAGE 1-2 AA FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF BARBER HOUSE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA, R.M. OF PEEL, ONTARIO TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ I TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. II PROJECT PERSONNEL ............................................................................................................ III 1.0 PROJECT CONTEXT ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 OBJECTIVE ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT .............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 HISTORICAL CONTEXT .................................................................................................................. 1 1.4 ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTEXT ........................................................................................................ 13 1.5 CONFIRMATION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL ........................................................................... 20 2.0 FIELD METHODS ............................................................................................................. 20 2.1 IDENTIFIED DEEP AND EXTENSIVE DISTURBANCES ............................................................................ 20 2.2 TEST PIT SURVEY ....................................................................................................................... 20 3.0 RECORD OF FINDS .......................................................................................................... 21 4.0 ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................ 21 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ..................................................................................................... 21 6.0 ADVICE ON COMPLIANCE WITH LEGISLATION ................................................................. 22 7.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SOURCES ........................................................................................ 23 APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................ 29 APPENDIX A: MAPS .................................................................................................................... 30 APPENDIX B: SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND RESEARCH ............................................................. 42 APPENDIX C: IMAGES ................................................................................................................. 43 APPENDIX D: INVENTORY OF DOCUMENTARY AND MATERIAL RECORD ................................... 47 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: HERITAGE PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE STUDY AREA ......................................................... 13 TABLE 2: HERITAGE PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN 300 METRES OF THE STUDY AREA .................................. 13 TABLE 3: REGISTERED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES WITHIN ONE KILOMETRE OF THE STUDY AREA ........................ 16 TABLE 4: HISTORY OF OCCUPATION IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO ................................................................... 17 ARCHEOWORKS INC. ii STAGE 1-2 AA FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF BARBER HOUSE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA, R.M. OF PEEL, ONTARIO PROJECT PERSONNEL Project Director ........................................................... Nimal Nithiyanantham - MTCS licence P390 Field Director ................................................................................ Jessica Marr - MTCS licence P334 Field Archaeologists .......................................................... Kassandra Aldridge - MTCS licence R437 Ian Boyce - MTCS licence R1059 Report Preparation ...................................................................... Alvina Tam - MTCS licence P1016 Report Review ............................................................. Nimal Nithiyanantham - MTCS licence P390 Historical Research.................................................................. Lee Templeton – MTCS licence R454 Graphics ....................................................................................... Alvina Tam - MTCS licence P1016 Lee Templeton – MTCS licence R454 ARCHEOWORKS INC. iii STAGE 1-2 AA FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF OLD BARBER HOUSE CITY OF MISSISSAUGA, R.M. OF PEEL, ONTARIO 1.0 PROJECT CONTEXT 1.1 Objective The objectives of a Stage 1-2 Archaeological Assessment (AA), as outlined by the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists (‘2011 S&G’) published by the Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and Sport (MTCS) (2011), are as follows: •To provide information about the property’s geography, history, previous archaeological fieldwork and current land condition; To evaluate in detail, the property’s archaeological potential, which will support recommendations for Stage 2 survey for all or parts of the property; To document all archaeological resources on the property; To determine whether the property contains archaeological resources requiring further assessment; and, To recommend appropriate Stage 3 assessment strategies for archaeological sites identified. 1.2 Development Context Archeoworks Inc. was retained by City Park (Old Barber) Homes Inc. to conduct a Stage 1-2 AA in support of the proposed commercial and residential development of common element townhouses at municipal address 5155 Mississauga Road, which will herein be referred to as the “study area”. The study area is located within part Lot 1, Concession 4 West of Hurontario Street (WHS) (or Centre Street), in the Geographic Township of Toronto (New Survey), historical County of Peel, City of Mississauga, Regional Municipality of Peel, Ontario (see Appendix A – Map 1). Currently, the City of Mississauga does not have an archaeological management plan. This study was triggered by the Planning Act in support of a development application to be filed with the City of Mississauga. The Stage 1-2 AA was conducted pre-submission under the project direction of Mr. Nimal Nithiyanantham, under the archaeological consultant licence number P390, in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act (2009). Permission to investigate the study area was granted by City Park (Old Barber) Homes Inc. on January 21st, 2016. 1.3 Historical Context The 2011 S&G considers areas of early Euro-Canadian settlement, including places of early military pioneer or pioneer settlement (e.g., pioneer homesteads, isolated cabins, and farmstead
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment
    STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT DUNLOP STREET WEST MUNICIPAL CLASS EA PARTS OF LOT 24, CONCESSIONS 5 TO 7 GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF VESPRA NOW CITY OF BARRIE COUNTY OF SIMCOE STAGE 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT DUNLOP STREET WEST MUNICIPAL CLASS EA, PARTS OF LOT 24, CONCESSIONS 5 TO 7, GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF VESPRA, NOW CITY OF BARRIE, COUNTY OF SIMCOE Prepared for: Nathan Farrell, MCIP, RPP, CAN CISEC Environmental Planner McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd. 400 2010 Winston Park Drive, Oakville, ON L6H 5R7 Phone: (289) 351-1206 Email: [email protected] Re: Municipal Class EA, Schedule C Prepared by: Lesley Howse, Ph.D. Associate Archaeologist Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc. 4534 Bolingbroke Road, R.R. #3 Maberly, ON K0H 2B0 Phone: (613) 267-7028 Email: [email protected] PRAS Project No.: PR19-011 Licensee: Adam Pollock, M.A., Licence P336 Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc. P.I.F. No.: P336-0254-2019 Date: June 17th, 2019 Original Report Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Dunlop Street West Municipal Class EA Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Mr. Nathan Farrel, Environmental Planner, McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd., provided overall project administration and logistical assistance. PROJECT PERSONNEL Project Manager Jeff Earl, M.Soc.Sc. (P031) Licence Holder Adam Pollock, M.A. (P336) Historical Research Lesley Howse, Ph.D. Drafting Adam Pollock Report Writing Lesley Howse and Jamie Lawson, M.A. Report Review Jeff Earl ii Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Dunlop Street West Municipal Class EA Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Past Recovery Archaeological Services Inc. was retained by McIntosh Perry Consulting Engineers Ltd., acting as project planners on behalf of the City of Barrie, to undertake a Stage 1 archaeological assessment as part of a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (MCEA) for improvements to a portion of Dunlop Street West, with consideration for additional improvements for all intersection legs.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithic Raw Material Characterization and Technological Organization of a Late Archaic Assemblage from Jacob Island, Kawartha Lakes, Ontario
    LITHIC RAW MATERIAL CHARACTERIZATION AND TECHNOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION OF A LATE ARCHAIC ASSEMBLAGE FROM JACOB ISLAND, KAWARTHA LAKES, ONTARIO A Thesis Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario © Copyright by Kathleen S. Elaschuk 2015 Anthropology M.A. Graduate Program May 2015 Abstract Lithic Raw Material Characterization and Technological Organization of a Late Archaic Assemblage from Jacob Island, Kawartha Lakes, Ontario Kathleen S. Elaschuk The objective of this thesis is to document and characterize the raw material and technological organization of a Late Archaic assemblage from Jacob Island, 1B/1C area (collectively referred to as BcGo-17), Peterborough County, Kawartha Lakes, Ontario. The purpose of this research is to gain a greater understanding of the Late Archaic period in central Ontario; particularly information on locally available raw material types (i.e., Trent Valley cherts) and regional interaction. My aim is to define the range of materials exploited for stone tool production and use, and to explore how variation in material relates to variation in economic strategies; I also complete a basic technological study. The collected data is then compared to temporally and geographically similar sites, and used to interpret possible relationships between acquisition practices, technology choices, and mobility. It was found that although the assemblage agrees with some of the mobility and raw material utilization models from south-western Ontario, many do not explain what was occurring on Jacob Island. Keywords: Ontario archaeology, Archaic, lithic technology, Trent chert, lithic economic strategies, lithic raw material, mobility, exchange, Trent Valley archaeology ii Acknowledgements This thesis would not have come to completion without the support of numerous people.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 2-3 Archaeological Assessments Report(PDF)
    Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Ministère du Tourisme, de la Culture et du Sport Sport Culture Programs Unit Unité des programmes culturels Programs and Services Branch Direction des programmes et des services Culture Division Division de culture 435 S. James Street, Suite 334 435, rue James sud, bureau 334 Thunder Bay ON P7E 6S7 Thunder Bay ON P7E 6S7 Tel.: 807-475-1628 Tél.: 807-475-1628 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] February 1, 2013 Dr. Dean Knight Archaeological Research Associates Ltd. 154 Otonabee Drive Kitchener, ON N2C 1L7 Dear Dr. Knight, RE: Review and Entry into the Ontario Public Register of Archaeological Reports: Archaeological Assessment Report Entitled Stage 2 and 3 Archaeological Assessments Port Ryerse Wind Power Project (FIT F-001579-WIN-130-601) Part of Lots 3–5, Broken Front Geographic Township of Woodhouse Norfolk County, Ontario, Revised Report Dated January 14, 2013, Filed by MTCS Toronto Office January 16, 2013, MTCS Project Information Form Number P089-014-2012 & P089- 018-2012, MTCS File Number HD00097 This office has reviewed the above-mentioned report, which has been submitted to this ministry as a condition of licensing in accordance with Part VI of the Ontario Heritage Act, R.S.O. 1990, c 0.18.1 This review has been carried out in order to determine whether the licensed professional consultant archaeologist has met the terms and conditions of their licence, that the licensee assessed the property and documented archaeological resources using a process that accords with the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consultant Archaeologists set by the ministry, and that the archaeological fieldwork and report recommendations are consistent with the conservation, protection and preservation of the cultural heritage of Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Interpreting the Nodwell Site
    mSTORICAL CONTEXT AND THE FORAGERIFARMER FRONTIER: RE-INTERPRETING THE NODWELL SITE By Lisa K. ~ B.A., M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School ofGraduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment ofthe Requirements for the Degree Doctor ofPhilosophy McMaster University to CopYright by Lisa Rankin, June 1998 mSTORICAL CONTEXT AND THE FORAGERIFARl\JIER FRONTIER Doctor ofPhilosophy (1998) McMaster University (Anthropology) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Historical Context and the ForagerlFanner Frontier: Re-Interpreting the Nodwell Site. Author: Lisa K. Rank:in, B.A (University ofBritish Columbia) M.A (Trent University) Supervisor: Dr. Peter Ramsden Number ofPages: 275 11 Abstract This thesis examines the socio-economic transition from foraging to farming in Bruce County, Ontario which culminates with the appearance ofthe NodweU village. The near complete excavation ofthis site determined that the NodweU village had both the fonn (settlement pattern) and contents (material culture and subsistence remains) representative ofa small-scale farming community, and was therefore distinct from the earlier forager habitations in the region. As recently as AD 1000 this region was occupied by mobile hunter-gatherers who followed an annual cycle, inhabiting numerous smaIl sites, in nuclear family units. This strategy allowed the foragers ofBruce county to exploit various natural resources throughout the region during the course ofthe year. In contrast, the Nodwell village was occupied by a much more sedentary community ofpeople, living in extended family groups, and producing domesticated crops. This transition occurred in a maximum of350 years. Until recently, this transition was explained using a migration model which suggested that an intact horticultural community had migrated into Bruce county in the mid-fourteenth century and replaced the indigenous foragers.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology Stage 1
    Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Pinnacle View Subdivision Development Prepared for: Kevin Mooder Jp2g Consultants Inc. 1150 Morrison Dr, Suite 410 Ottawa, ON K2H 8S9 Phone: 613-828-7800 Fax: 613- email:[email protected] Prepared by: Cameron Heritage Consulting 5021-25 Civic Centre Road Petawawa, ON K8H 0B1 Phone (613) 281-3838 email: [email protected] C.H.C. Project #2017011A PIF Number:P371-0017-2017 Courtney Cameron (License Number P371) ORIGINAL REPORT March 2, 2018 Cameron Heritage Consulting Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Pinnacle View Subdivision Development EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment was completed under the scope of the Planning Act in preparation for the construction of a housing development in Renfrew, ON. The Proposed Development Area (PDA) is located within Lot 14 Concession 1, Horton Township (Geo.), Town of Renfrew, County of Renfrew, Ontario. The PDA is approximately 15 ha and is bounded on the southwest by an old rail bed, to the southeast and northeast by the backyards of houses along Aberdeen Street, Mason Avenue and McAndrew Ave, and to the northwest an agricultural field. The Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment included consultation with local heritage organizations, reviews of aerial imagery, archaeological potential maps, national topographic maps, physiographic maps and early maps of the area. In addition, information regarding known archaeological sites in the vicinity, land grants, and historical reference books for the PDA was reviewed. A site visit to assess archaeological potential was conducted November 29, 2017. Based upon the review of background material and the site visit, there are areas with and without potential for the presence of archaeological resources within the PDA.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment
    Original Report: Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment Proposed Residential Plan of Subdivision 29845 Pioneer Line, Dutton, Part of Lot 13, Concession A, Township of Dunwich, Elgin County, Ontario Project # SCL191301 Archaeological Consulting License # P066 (O’Neal) P.I.F. # P066-0322-2019 (Stage 1 & 2) Prepared for: Titan Group Construction Inc. 29845 Pioneer Line Dutton, Ontario, N0L1J0 8-Jan-20 Stage 1 & 2 Archaeological Assessment Proposed Residential Plan of Subdivision 29845 Pioneer Line, Dutton, Part of Lot 13, Concession A, Township of Dunwich, Elgin County, Ontario Project # SCL191301 Prepared for: Titan Group Construction Inc. 29845 Pioneer Line Dutton, Ontario, N0L1J0 Prepared by: Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, a Division of Wood Canada Limited 8-Jan-20 Copyright and non-disclosure notice The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright owned by Wood (© Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions, a Division of Wood Canada Limited). save to the extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by Wood under license. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of Wood. Disclosure of that information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage 1 and Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment Proposed New
    Stage 1 and Stage 2 Archaeological Assessment Proposed New Headquarters Building for Drytech Part of Lot 29, Concession 1 Geographic Township of Cumberland, Russell County ORIGINAL REPORT Prepared for: Eric Cameron, P. Eng. Vice President Mar Gard 92 Bentley Avenue, 2nd Floor Ottawa, ON K2E 6T9 Ph: 613.723.1640 E: [email protected] Prepared by: Laura McRae Director and Chief Archaeologist Derek Paauw President and Chief Archaeologist The Central Archaeology Group Inc. 144 Upper Turriff Road L’Amable, ON K0L 2L0 T. 705.201.1066 F. 866.231.6071 Stage 1 PIF No. P248-0166-2013! Laura McRae (licensee) CAGI Project No. CAGI-2013-LM52 Stage 2 PIF No. P248-0170-2013! Laura McRae (licensee) CAGI Project No. CAGI-2013-LM56 Original Report Submission - December 11, 2013 Distribution: !! ! ! Mar Gard !!!!!City of Ottawa !!!!!Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport Bringing the past to the present for the future PROPOSED DRYTECH HQ! REPORT NO. CAGI-2013-LM52 / LM56 STAGE 1 AND STAGE 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Project Personnel Project Director Mapping Laura McRae, P248 Derek Paauw Client Contact Laura McRae Eric Cameron, Mar Gard Report Preparation Research Derek Paauw Derek Paauw, P272 Report Editor Laura McRae Derek Paauw Field Crew Administration Derek Paauw Deb Coit Laura McRae Rick Coit Erin Edwards Ildaco Golton DECEMBER 2013! ii!! PROPOSED DRYTECH HQ! REPORT NO. CAGI-2013-LM52 / LM56 STAGE 1 AND STAGE 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT Acknowledgements The Central Archaeology Group Inc. would like to extend their gratitude to the following individuals and parties. ✺ Eric Cameron, Vice President, Mar Gard. ✺ Rob von Bitter, Archaeological Database Sites Coordinator, Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heritage Gazette of the Trent Valley
    ISSN 1206-4394 The herITage gazeTTe of The TreNT Valley Volume 20, Number 1, may 2015 President’s Corner …………………………………………………..………………………………. Guy Thompson 2 Champlain’s Route to Lake Ontario? …………………………………………………………… Stewart Richardson 3 Champlain and the 5th Franco-Ontarian Day …………………………………..…… Peter Adams and Alan Brunger 10 Trent University and Samuel de Champlain …………………………………………. Alan Brunger and Peter Adams 11 Fellows in the News [Alan Brunger and Peter Adams] ……………………………………………………………….. 13 Celebrate the Tercentenary at Kawartha Lakes …………………………..… Peterborough Examiner, 7 August 1914 13 Morris Bishop’s Account of Champlain in Ontario, from his book Champlain: the Life of Fortitude, 1948 ……………………..……. Peter Adams and Alan Brunger 14 A Concise History of the Anishnabek of Curve Lake ……………………………………………………. Peter Adams 17 The Architectural Legacy of the Bradburns …………………………………………………………… Sharon Skinner 19 The Bradburn Family ………………………………………………………..…………………………. Sharon Skinner 23 Queries ………………………………...………………………………… Heather Aiton Landry and Elwood H. Jones 25 Chemong Floating Bridge 25; Meharry 25; Cavan Death of an Old Resident 26; An Electric Car Built in Peterborough: No! 26; Peter Lemoire 32 Peter Robinson Festival: Summer heritage and performing arts festival takes place on Civic Holiday long weekend … 27 Marble slab advertising mystery is partly solved ……………………….. Elwood H. Jones, Peterborough Examiner 27 News, Views and Reviews ……………………………………………………………….………… Elwood H. Jones 29 Peterborough Museum and Archives 29; CHEX-TV at 60 29; County people tour TVA 29; Douro’s Tilted Crumpling Cross 29; Irish Heritage Event was Great Success 30; Pioneer Days in Hastings & District 31 (The French Village, Lemoire family) 32; Italian Club Dinner 33; Daniel Macdonald monument at Little Lake Cemetery 33; OGS Toronto Conference 33; Love in the Air: Second World War Letters (CHEX-TV report by Steve Guthrie) Joanne Culley 33; Lazarus Payne: Growing Up in Dummer 34; Book notes 35 Archaeology of Lake Katchewanooka ………………………………………………….…………….
    [Show full text]
  • Visibility Analysis of the Rice Lake Burial Mounds and Related Sites
    NOTE TO USERS This reproduction is the best copy available. UMI VISIBILITY ANALYSIS OF THE RICE LAKE BURIAL MOUNDS AND RELATED SITES A Thesis Submitted to the Committee on Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada > Copyright by Jeffrey Bryan Dillane 2009 Anthropology M. A. Graduate Program January 2010 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 OttawaONK1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-53559-2 Our We Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-53559-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Carchaeology
    Stage 1 Background Study PartStage of 1Lots and 14Stage and 215, Archaeological Concession 2, Assessment Geographic Township of McClintock,ThreeStage Culvert 1 and now Replacements Stage the Township2 Archaeological along of Algonquin Highway Assessment 7 Highlands, Haliburton CountyPartThree of Lot Culvert 3, Concession Replacements 3 (23200070002) along Highway and 7 Part of Lot 4, Concession 5 (23200070005),Part of Lot 3, ConcessionGeographic 3 Township (23200070002) of Madoc, and PartHastings of Lot County 4, Concession and the 5 OriginalRoad(23200070005), ReportAllowance - July 19, between 2018 Geographic Lots Township26 and 27, of ConcessionMadoc, Hastings 4 (23300070046), County and the GeographicRoad Allowance Township between of Otonabee, Lots 26 andPeterborough 27, Concession County 4 (23300070046), ProjectGeographic #15841-2 Township of Otonabee, Peterborough County SubmittedProject to: #15841-2 StephanieORIGINAL Reed, REPORT P. Geo., CET ORIGINAL REPORT Project Manager CambiumMarch 14, 2017Inc. 52 HunterMarch Street14, 2017 East Peterborough, ON K9H 1G5 Submitted to: Ph: 705.742.7900Submitted to: x204 Scott Reynolds, B.Sc (Env), EP E: [email protected] Reynolds, B.Sc (Env), EP Environmental Planner Environmental Planner Ainley Group Ainley Group 45 South Front Street 45 South Front Street PIFBelleville, No.Belleville, P248-0318-2018 ON K8N ON K8N2Y5 2Y5 LauraPh: 613.966.4243Ph: McRae 613.966.4243 (License x105 x105 No. P248) E: [email protected]: [email protected] ThePIF CentralNo.PIF P248-0272-2016No. P248-0272-2016Archaeology Group Inc. LauraLaura McRae McRae (License (License No. No. P248) P248) 2401 5th Line East Campbellford, ON K0L 1L0 Ph:The 705.868.2697 CentralThe Central Archaeology Archaeology Group Group Inc. Inc. 2401 24015th Line 5th LineEast East Fax:Campbellford, 866.231.6071Campbellford, ON ONK0L K0L1L0 1L0 Phone: 705.201.1066 E:Phone: [email protected] 705.201.1066 Fax: 866.231.6071Fax: 866.231.6071 Email:Email: [email protected] [email protected] CAGI Project No.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Resilience to Climate- Related Disasters in Ancient Societies: a Test of Two Hypotheses
    Social Resilience to Climate- Related Disasters in Ancient Societies: A Test of Two Hypotheses Peter N. Peregrine SFI WORKING PAPER: 2017-17-024 SFI Working Papers contain accounts of scienti5ic work of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Santa Fe Institute. We accept papers intended for publication in peer-reviewed journals or proceedings volumes, but not papers that have already appeared in print. Except for papers by our external faculty, papers must be based on work done at SFI, inspired by an invited visit to or collaboration at SFI, or funded by an SFI grant. ©NOTICE: This working paper is included by permission of the contributing author(s) as a means to ensure timely distribution of the scholarly and technical work on a non-commercial basis. Copyright and all rights therein are maintained by the author(s). It is understood that all persons copying this information will adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may be reposted only with the explicit permission of the copyright holder. www.santafe.edu SANTA FE INSTITUTE SOCIAL RESILIENCE TO CLIMATE-RELATED DISASTERS IN ANCIENT SOCIETIES: A TEST OF TWO HYPOTHESES Peter N. Peregrine Lawrence University, Appleton, WI 54911 and the Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM 87501 ([email protected]) Abstract Current literature on disaster response argues that societies providing greater local participation in decision-making and which have more community coordination and governance organizations are more resilient to climate-related disasters. In contrast, recent research in psychology has argued that societies with tighter social norms and greater enforcement of those norms are more resilient.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Diet-Breadth and the Middle to Late Woodland Transition in Southcentral Ontario (Ca
    FROM FORAGING TO FARMING: CHANGING DIET-BREADTH AND THE MIDDLE TO LATE WOODLAND TRANSITION IN SOUTHCENTRAL ONTARIO (CA. 1450–650 BP) A Thesis Submitted to the Committee of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Daniel Worby, 2018 Anthropology M.A. Graduate Program May 2018 ABSTRACT From Foraging to Farming: Changing Diet-Breadth and the Middle to Late Woodland Transition in Southcentral Ontario (ca. 1450–650 B.P.) Daniel Worby This study examines foraging strategies during the Middle Woodland Period’s Sandbanks Phase (A.D. 700–1000) on Boyd Island, Pigeon Lake, Ontario. The faunal remains analyzed in this study were recovered from a site associated with the procurement of aquatic and terrestrial taxa. Detailed taphonomic analyses have revealed that the Boyd Island faunal remains were affected by weathering and human transport decisions. White-tailed deer was the most frequently acquired prey at Boyd Island, followed by black bear. Using the central place forager prey choice model as a framework, the analysis of diet breadth and carcass transport patterns suggests that most animal resources were acquired from both aquatic and terrestrial habitats, at moderate distances from the site. Incomplete carcasses of large game appear to have been transported away from the site, where they were subsequently processed for provisioning or consumption. Comparisons with other Sandbanks faunal assemblages and those dating to later periods indicate significant differences in terms of taxonomic composition, while continuing to emphasize the use of fish.
    [Show full text]