DOCSLIB.ORG

Pelican Lake Complex

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pelican Lake Complex An Overview of Archeology in North Dakota .................................................................... 1 Study Units for the Archeological Component ............................................................... 1 Definitions for “Archeological Site” and the Problem of Properties which Straddle Study Unit Borders ......................................................................................................... 4 Study Units Vis-à-Vis Traditional Archeological Spatial Units ..................................... 8 Archeological Unit Terms............................................................................................. 10 Cultural Traditions .................................................................................................... 10 Cultural Complexes .................................................................................................. 12 Components .............................................................................................................. 13 Phases ........................................................................................................................ 13 Cultural Periods ........................................................................................................ 13 Dates and Dating Methods ................................................................................... 14 The Named Cultural Traditions .................................................................................... 17 The Paleo-Indian Tradition ....................................................................................... 17 Clovis Complex ..................................................................................................... 20 Goshen Complex ................................................................................................... 21 Folsom Complex ................................................................................................... 22 Agate Basin-Hell Gap Complex ............................................................................ 23 Cody Complex ...................................................................................................... 24 Parallel-Oblique Flaked Complex ........................................................................ 25 Pryor Stemmed Complex....................................................................................... 26 Caribou Lake Complex ......................................................................................... 26 Logan Creek-Mummy Cave Complex ................................................................... 27 Oxbow Complex .................................................................................................... 28 McKean Lanceolate Complex ............................................................................... 29 Duncan Complex ................................................................................................... 30 Hanna Complex .................................................................................................... 30 Pelican Lake Complex .......................................................................................... 31 Yonkee Complex .................................................................................................... 32 Unclassified Late Plains Archaic Components..................................................... 32 The Plains Woodland Tradition ................................................................................ 33 Unclassified Early Plains Woodland Components ............................................... 33 The Middle Plains Woodland Period .................................................................... 34 Sonota and Besant Complexes .............................................................................. 34 Laurel Complex ..................................................................................................... 35 The Late Plains Woodland Period ........................................................................ 36 Avonlea Complex .................................................................................................. 37 Blackduck Complex ............................................................................................... 38 Mortlach Complex ................................................................................................ 39 Old Women’s Complex ......................................................................................... 39 Sandy Lake Complex ............................................................................................. 40 The Plains Village Tradition ..................................................................................... 41 Middle Missouri .................................................................................................... 41 Coalescent ............................................................................................................. 42 Northeastern Plains Village Complex .................................................................. 42 Equestrian Tradition/Fur Trade................................................................................. 44 One Gun Complex ................................................................................................. 45 Research Topics for North Dakota Archeology................................................................ 45 Paleo-Environmental Modeling .................................................................................... 45 Paleo-Climate ............................................................................................................ 46 Cultural Chronology ..................................................................................................... 49 Settlement Behavior ...................................................................................................... 50 Stone Circle Sites ...................................................................................................... 52 Statewide Population Density ................................................................................... 54 Native Subsistence Practices......................................................................................... 54 Technologies ................................................................................................................. 55 Artifact Styles ............................................................................................................... 58 Regional Interaction ...................................................................................................... 58 Field, Laboratory, and Analytical Methodologies ........................................................ 60 Treatment of the Individual Study Units ...................................................................... 61 Description of Each Study Unit .................................................................................... 61 Overview of Previous Archeological Work .................................................................. 61 Inventory Projects ..................................................................................................... 61 Site Data Tabulations ........................................................................................... 62 Test Excavation Projects ........................................................................................... 63 Major Excavation Projects ........................................................................................ 64 Other Work ............................................................................................................... 64 Coverage by Cultural Periods ....................................................................................... 64 Paleo-Environmental Modeling ................................................................................ 64 Cultural Chronology ................................................................................................. 65 Settlement Behavior .................................................................................................. 65 Native Subsistence Practices..................................................................................... 65 Technologies ............................................................................................................. 65 Artifact Styles ........................................................................................................... 66 Regional Interaction .................................................................................................. 66 Historic Preservation Goals, Priorities, and Strategies ............................................. 66 Discussion of National Register Eligibility Criteria ......................................................... 66 Discussion of Inventory Terminology .......................................................................... 68 Archeology Component of the State Plan: An Overview of Archeology in North Dakota Michael L. Gregg, Paul R. Picha, Fern E. Swenson, and Amy C. Bleier 2016 The North Dakota Comprehensive Plan for Historic Preservation: Archeological Component begins with statewide considerations of the Study Units (drainage basins) used for prehistoric and protohistoric archeological site studies and management in the state. Then a chronological model is presented for the state as a whole, and generalized research topics
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains Edited by George C
    Tri-Services Cultural Resources Research Center USACERL Special Report 97/2 December 1996 U.S. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort, with contributions by George C. Frison, Dennis L. Toom, Michael L. Gregg, John Williams, Laura L. Scheiber, George W. Gill, James C. Miller, Julie E. Francis, Robert C. Mainfort, David Schwab, L. Adrien Hannus, Peter Winham, David Walter, David Meyer, Paul R. Picha, and David G. Stanley A Volume in the Central and Northern Plains Archeological Overview Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 47 1996 Arkansas Archeological Survey Fayetteville, Arkansas 1996 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Archeological and bioarcheological resources of the Northern Plains/ edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort; with contributions by George C. Frison [et al.] p. cm. — (Arkansas Archeological Survey research series; no. 47 (USACERL special report; 97/2) “A volume in the Central and Northern Plains archeological overview.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-56349-078-1 (alk. paper) 1. Indians of North America—Great Plains—Antiquities. 2. Indians of North America—Anthropometry—Great Plains. 3. Great Plains—Antiquities. I. Frison, George C. II. Mainfort, Robert C. III. Arkansas Archeological Survey. IV. Series. V. Series: USA-CERL special report: N-97/2. E78.G73A74 1996 96-44361 978’.01—dc21 CIP Abstract The 12,000 years of human occupation in the Northwestern Great Plains states of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, and South Dakota is reviewed here.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Together to Preserve the Past
    CUOURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT information for Parks, Federal Agencies, Trtoian Tribes, States, Local Governments, and %he Privale Sector <yt CRM TotLUME 18 NO. 7 1995 Working Together to Preserve the Past U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Cultural Resources PUBLISHED BY THE VOLUME 18 NO. 7 1995 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Contents ISSN 1068-4999 To promote and maintain high standards for preserving and managing cultural resources Working Together DIRECTOR to Preserve the Past Roger G. Kennedy ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR Katherine H. Stevenson The Historic Contact in the Northeast EDITOR National Historic Landmark Theme Study Ronald M. Greenberg An Overview 3 PRODUCTION MANAGER Robert S. Grumet Karlota M. Koester A National Perspective 4 GUEST EDITOR Carol D. Shull Robert S. Grumet ADVISORS The Most Important Things We Can Do 5 David Andrews Lloyd N. Chapman Editor, NPS Joan Bacharach Museum Registrar, NPS The NHL Archeological Initiative 7 Randall J. Biallas Veletta Canouts Historical Architect, NPS John A. Bums Architect, NPS Harry A. Butowsky Shantok: A Tale of Two Sites 8 Historian, NPS Melissa Jayne Fawcett Pratt Cassity Executive Director, National Alliance of Preservation Commissions Pemaquid National Historic Landmark 11 Muriel Crespi Cultural Anthropologist, NPS Robert L. Bradley Craig W. Davis Archeologist, NPS Mark R. Edwards The Fort Orange and Schuyler Flatts NHL 15 Director, Historic Preservation Division, Paul R. Huey State Historic Preservation Officer, Georgia Bruce W Fry Chief of Research Publications National Historic Sites, Parks Canada The Rescue of Fort Massapeag 20 John Hnedak Ralph S. Solecki Architectural Historian, NPS Roger E. Kelly Archeologist, NPS Historic Contact at Camden NHL 25 Antoinette J.
    [Show full text]
  • 15'. W I Reow-S+ .F£JY Ca~~ - SC~ S 6~~ Per~I
    G6rv -TA-r-0001w1-~15'. w I Reow-s+ .f£JY ca~~ - SC~ S 6~~ Per~i - fr - -- ._ J;' "'""'"""' j i LUl:J : _:JI resourceful. naturally. BARR engineering and environmental consultants - ---··------' I - ~ I r 12/18/2015 Attn: Claudia Smith EPA Region 8 Air Program {8P-AR) 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO, 80202 Re: Request for Coverage under the General Air Quality Permit for New or Modified True Minor Source Stone Quarrying, Crushing, and Screening Facilities in Indian Country Dear Ms. Smith: On behalf of U.S Silica, enclosed is an application for a general permit to request coverage under the General Air Quality Permit for New or Modified True Minor Source Stone Quarrying, Crushing, and Screening Facilities in Indian Country. U.S. Silica {USS) is proposing construction of a new rail transload facility to transport silica sand from rail cars to trucks near Parshall, North Dakota in support of ongoing oil and gas development in the Bakken region. We have reviewed the criteria for coverage under this permit per 40 CFR Part 49 and the guidance materials found on EPA's Tribal Minor New Source Review website and have determined that it meets the applicable requirements. In addition to the application, we have included supplemental information in this application package to aid your review of this request including: site diagram, process flow diagrams, emission calculation documentation, equipment information on dust collection units, endangered species act review documentation, and documentation that the requirements of the screening process per the National Historic Preservation Act have been completed. If you have any questions or require additional information for a complete review of this request for coverage, please contact Rachel Ames at (952) 832-2845 or [email protected] or Lori Stegink at (952) 832- 2633 [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Statewide Multiple Property Documentation Form for the Woodland Tradition
    Minnesota Statewide Multiple Property Documentation Form for the Woodland Tradition Submitted to the Minnesota Department of Transportation Submitted by Constance Arzigian Mississippi Valley Archaeology Center at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse July 2008 MINNESOTA STATEWIDE MULTIPLE PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION FORM FOR THE WOODLAND TRADITION FINAL Mn/DOT Agreement No. 89964 MVAC Report No. 735 Authorized and Sponsored by: Minnesota Department of Transportation Submitted by Mississippi Valley Archaeology Center at the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse 1725 State Street La Crosse WI 54601 Principal Investigator and Report Author Constance Arzigian July 2008 NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Aug. 2002) (Expires 1-31-2009) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. __X_ New Submission ____ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Woodland Tradition in Minnesota B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) The Brainerd Complex: Early Woodland in Central and Northern Minnesota, 1000 B.C.–A.D. 400 The Southeast Minnesota Early Woodland Complex, 500–200 B.C. The Havana-Related Complex: Middle Woodland in Central and Eastern Minnesota, 200 B.C.–A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Red River Valley Water Supply Project Class I Cultural Resources Inventory and Assessment, Eastern North Dakota and Nortwestern Minnesota
    RED RIVER VALLEY WATER SUPPLY PROJECT CLASS I CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT, EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA AND NORTWESTERN MINNESOTA Michael A. Jackson, Dennis L. Toom, and Cynthia Kordecki December 2006 ABSTRACT In 2004-2006, personnel from Anthropology Research, Department of Anthropology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, conducted a Class I inventory (file search) for the Red River Valley Water Supply Project (RRVWSP). This work was carried out in cooperation with the USDI Bureau of Reclamation, Dakotas Area Office, Bismarck, ND. The file search dealt with hundreds of cultural resource sites across much of eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. Archeological sites, architectural sites, site leads, and isolated finds were examined for 14 North Dakota counties and four Minnesota counties. Five different action alternatives were investigated to determine the number and types of previously recorded cultural resources located within each. Each alternative was ranked in terms of its potential to cause impacts to cultural resources, both known and (presently) unknown. Analysis indicated that the Red River Basin Alternative (#3) has the largest potential for cultural resource site impacts. From a least-impact cultural resources perspective, the other four alternatives represent the best, least-impact options for construction of the RRVWSP. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................................ii
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology Inventory Table of Contents
    National Historic Landmarks--Archaeology Inventory Theresa E. Solury, 1999 Updated and Revised, 2003 Caridad de la Vega National Historic Landmarks-Archeology Inventory Table of Contents Review Methods and Processes Property Name ..........................................................1 Cultural Affiliation .......................................................1 Time Period .......................................................... 1-2 Property Type ...........................................................2 Significance .......................................................... 2-3 Theme ................................................................3 Restricted Address .......................................................3 Format Explanation .................................................... 3-4 Key to the Data Table ........................................................ 4-6 Data Set Alabama ...............................................................7 Alaska .............................................................. 7-9 Arizona ............................................................. 9-10 Arkansas ..............................................................10 California .............................................................11 Colorado ..............................................................11 Connecticut ........................................................ 11-12 District of Columbia ....................................................12 Florida ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology Stage 1
    Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Pinnacle View Subdivision Development Prepared for: Kevin Mooder Jp2g Consultants Inc. 1150 Morrison Dr, Suite 410 Ottawa, ON K2H 8S9 Phone: 613-828-7800 Fax: 613- email:[email protected] Prepared by: Cameron Heritage Consulting 5021-25 Civic Centre Road Petawawa, ON K8H 0B1 Phone (613) 281-3838 email: [email protected] C.H.C. Project #2017011A PIF Number:P371-0017-2017 Courtney Cameron (License Number P371) ORIGINAL REPORT March 2, 2018 Cameron Heritage Consulting Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment Pinnacle View Subdivision Development EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment was completed under the scope of the Planning Act in preparation for the construction of a housing development in Renfrew, ON. The Proposed Development Area (PDA) is located within Lot 14 Concession 1, Horton Township (Geo.), Town of Renfrew, County of Renfrew, Ontario. The PDA is approximately 15 ha and is bounded on the southwest by an old rail bed, to the southeast and northeast by the backyards of houses along Aberdeen Street, Mason Avenue and McAndrew Ave, and to the northwest an agricultural field. The Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment included consultation with local heritage organizations, reviews of aerial imagery, archaeological potential maps, national topographic maps, physiographic maps and early maps of the area. In addition, information regarding known archaeological sites in the vicinity, land grants, and historical reference books for the PDA was reviewed. A site visit to assess archaeological potential was conducted November 29, 2017. Based upon the review of background material and the site visit, there are areas with and without potential for the presence of archaeological resources within the PDA.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB .vo ion-0018 (Jan 1987) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places JUH151990' Multiple Property Documentation Form NATIONAL REGISTER This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing___________________________________________ Prehistoric Paleo-Indian Cultures of the Colorado Plains, ca. 11,500-7500 BP B. Associated Historic Contexts_____________________________________________ Sub-context; Clovis Culture; 11,500-11,000 B.P.____________ sub-context: Folsom Culture; 11,000-10,000 B.P. Sub-context; Piano Culture: 10,000-7500 B.P. C. Geographical Data___________________________________________________ The Plains Region of Colorado is that area of the state within the Great Plains Physiographic Province, comprising most of the eastern half of the state (Figure 1). The Colorado Plains is bounded on the north, east and south by the Colorado State Line. On the west, it is bounded by the foothills of the Rocky Mountains. [_]See continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of relaje«kproperties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional renuirifiaejits set forth in 36 CFSKPaV 60 and.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Author Publisher Date in V. Iss. # C. Key Words Call Number
    Title Author Publisher Date In V. Iss. # C. Key Words Call Number Field Manual for Avocational Archaeologists Adams, Nick The Ontario 1994 1 Archaeology, Methodology CC75.5 .A32 1994 in Ontario Archaeological Society Inc. Prehistoric Mesoamerica Adams, Richard E. Little, Brown and 1977 1 Archaeology, Aztec, Olmec, Maya, Teotihuacan F1219 .A22 1991 W. Company Lithic Illustration: Drawing Flaked Stone Addington, Lucile R. The University of 1986 Archaeology 000Unavailable Artifacts for Publication Chicago Press The Bark Canoes and Skin Boats of North Adney, Edwin Tappan Smithsonian Institution 1983 1 Form, Construction, Maritime, Central Canada, E98 .B6 A46 1983 America and Howard I. Press Northwestern Canada, Arctic Chappelle The Knife River Flint Quarries: Excavations Ahler, Stanley A. State Historical Society 1986 1 Archaeology, Lithic, Quarry E78 .N75 A28 1986 at Site 32DU508 of North Dakota The Prehistoric Rock Paintings of Tassili N' Mazonowicz, Douglas Douglas Mazonowicz 1970 1 Archaeology, Rock Art, Sahara, Sandstone N5310.5 .T3 M39 1970 Ajjer The Archeology of Beaver Creek Shelter Alex, Lynn Marie Rocky Mountain Region 1991 Selections form the 3 1 Archaeology, South Dakota, Excavation E78 .S63 A38 1991 (39CU779): A Preliminary Statement National Park Service Division of Cultural Resources People of the Willows: The Prehistory and Ahler, Stanley A., University of North 1991 1 Archaeology, Mandan, North Dakota E99 .H6 A36 1991 Early History of the Hidatsa Indians Thomas D. Thiessen, Dakota Press Michael K. Trimble Archaeological Chemistry
    [Show full text]
  • Late Paleoindian Land Tenure in Southwest Wyoming: Towards
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Anthropology Department Theses and Dissertations Anthropology, Department of 2019 Late Paleoindian Land Tenure in Southwest Wyoming: Towards Integrating Method and Theory in an Analysis of Taphochronometric Indicators of Time-Averaged Deposits in the Wyoming Basin, Wyoming USA Cynthia D. Highland University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthrotheses Part of the Anthropology Commons Highland, Cynthia D., "Late Paleoindian Land Tenure in Southwest Wyoming: Towards Integrating Method and Theory in an Analysis of Taphochronometric Indicators of Time-Averaged Deposits in the Wyoming Basin, Wyoming USA" (2019). Anthropology Department Theses and Dissertations. 61. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthrotheses/61 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Department Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. LATE PALEOINDIAN LAND TENURE IN SOUTHWEST WYOMING: TOWARDS INTEGRATING METHOD AND THEORY IN AN ANALYSIS OF TAPHOCHRONOMETRIC INDICATORS OF TIME-AVERAGED DEPOSITS IN THE WYOMING BASIN, WYOMING USA by CYNTHIA D. HIGHLAND A THESIS Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Major: Anthropology Under the Supervision of Professor LuAnn Wandsnider Lincoln, Nebraska December 2019 LATE PALEOINDIAN LAND TENURE IN SOUTHWEST WYOMING: TOWARDS INTEGRATING METHOD AND THEORY IN AN ANALYSIS OF TAPHOCHRONOMETRIC INDICATORS OF TIME-AVERAGED DEPOSITS IN THE WYOMING BASIN, WYOMING USA Cynthia D.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Impact of Resharpening on Paleoindian Projectile Point Blade Shape Using Geometric Morphometric Techniques
    Chapter 11 An Assessment of the Impact of Resharpening on Paleoindian Projectile Point Blade Shape Using Geometric Morphometric Techniques Briggs Buchanan and Mark Collard Abstract Paleoindian archaeologists have long recognized that resharpening has the potential to affect the shape of projectile points. So far, however, the impact of resharpening on the distinctiveness of the blades of Paleoindian projectile points has not been investigated quantitatively. With this in mind, we used geometric morphometric techniques to compare the blades of Clovis, Folsom, and Plainview projectile points from the Southern Plains of North America. We evaluated two hypotheses. The first was that blade shape distinguishes the three types. We found that blade shape distinguished Clovis points from both Folsom and Plainview points, but did not distinguish Folsom points from Plainview points. The second hypothesis we tested was that resharpening eliminates blade shape differences among the types. To test this hypothesis, we used size as a proxy for resharpening. The results of this analysis were similar to those obtained in the first analysis. Thus, our study suggests that, contrary to what is often assumed, resharpening does not automatically undermine the use of blade shape in Paleoindian projectile point typologies. Introduction The assignment of projectile points to types is critical for research on the Paleoindian period in North America. Paleoindian specialists rely on projectile point typology to situate assemblages in time when directly dateable material is not recovered. Furthermore, because Paleoindian points are found in such high numbers in mixed or isolated surface contexts, many studies concerning changes in technology and land use have relied on typed specimens (e.g., Anderson and Faught 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Lithic Technology at the Below Forks Site, Fhng-25: Strategems of Stone Tool Manufacture
    Lithic Technology at The Below Forks Site, FhNg-25: Strategems of Stone Tool Manufacture. A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Archaeology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. By Steven C. Kasstan March 2004. © 2004 (Copyright Steven C. Kasstan. All Rights Reserved.) PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or make other use of material in this thesis in whole or in part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Archaeology, University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. S7N 2A5. i ABSTRACT The Below Forks site is a deeply stratified multicomponent archaeological site situated two kilometres downstream from the confluence of the North and South Saskatchewan Rivers.
    [Show full text]