Lockheed Martin Canada Ltd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lockheed Martin Canada Ltd Lockheed Martin Canada Ltd. ockheed Martin (LM) Canada is AEGIS Combat System acronym stands for “Advanced Elec- a subsidiary of Lockheed Mar- For its part, LM Canada is contributing tronic Guidance and Instrumentation Ltin, the world’s biggest war in- to its parent company’s endeavours System.” However, no matter how cute dustry. LM is also one of the top pro- through the production of an interac- the nomenclature, weapons are still the ducers of the weapons systems that are tive training and simulation system destructive tools of war. And, no mat- being developed under the so-called called VISTA. This computer-based ter how clever the appropriation of an- “missile defense” program. product prepares military personnel to cient Greek mythological symbols, AE- Lockheed Martin’s contribution use the AEGIS Combat System. AEGIS GIS is, in fact, just a weapons system to the “missile defense” weapons de- is the backbone of the U.S. Navy’s “mis- velopment program includes oversee- sile defense” weapons program. Martin ing a wide variety of major weapons Military products are sometimes Munro systems including the following: named after characters or objects from • land-based weapons known as Ter- myths. The term “AEGIS” provides an minal High Altitude Area Defense, illustration of this practice. The ancient • a sea-based missile system referred Greek poet, Homer, described a magical to as the AEGIS Combat System, shield called aegis that was possessed • space-based Beam Control System by Zeus and Athena. (See “Aegis was for laser weapons, the Deadly Shield of the Rapacious God, • the Flight Turret Assembly for la- Zeus,”pp. 24-25.) However, the term ser weapons to be used aboard AEGIS has now been expropriated by converted 747-400F aircraft.1 the U.S. military and refers to a weap- ons system that masquerades as a de- fensive shield. The AEGIS missile sys- General Manager, tem shelters under the protective term Lockheed Martin Canada “missile defense.” Nowadays, it is used unro’s career began in the Ship- not by Zeus, the god of all gods, but 3001 Solandt Road Building Branch of the Depart- by the military of all militaries. M Kanata ON K2K 2M8 ment of Supply and Services in 1983, It is also often the case that the Tel.: 613-599-3270 when Canada’s largest-ever military military, and their corporate allies, give Fax: 613-599-3282 contract—the patrol frigate project— fancy acronyms to their extremely Email: [email protected] was first awarded. Munro left in 1989 deadly, high-tech, weapons systems. Website: www.lmco.com to join Martin Marietta Canada, a AEGIS is a classic case in point. This Lockheed Martin Canada company.1 Lockheed Martin Canada Awarded Lockheed Martin Canada is the “prime systems integrator of the Ca- $43-Million Contract for Canada’s next Census nadian patrol-frigate program, which By Steve Lambert Lockheed Martin has worked to includes the design, development develop the space-based missile-de- and integration of the combat sys- he federal government has finalized fence system—dubbed Star Wars. tem, the integrated machinery con- a $43.3-million deal that will see the T Critics fear some census infor- trol system, [and] the land-based test 2006 census conducted with the help mation could make its way into the facility for all 12 ships.”2 of the Canadian subsidiary of a U.S. hands of the U.S. government. Munro uses his government weapons manufacturer. They point to the U.S. Patriot experience to help land lucrative, war- Some peace groups and oppo- Act, which was enacted following the related contracts. He also speaks at sition politicians are concerned about terrorist attacks of 2001. It allows the events, like the “Federal Government taxpayer dollars’ going to a weapons- FBI and other U.S. authorities access Procurement Conference of the Ameri- builder. “There’s a moral issue, I believe, to information held by private U.S. com- cas” (November 2004), organized by Ca- in having an arms manufacturing panies. There are concerns that power nadian and U.S. government agencies.3 industry...do our census data collection might extend to companies in Canada among citizens [whose] relatives... References with headquarters in the U.S. abroad...could be hurt [by Lockheed 1. Executive Profile Statistics Canada says such se- Martin weapons],” said New Democrat <www.lockheedmartin.com> curity concerns are not valid. MP Brian Masse, of Windsor, Ontario. 2. 2005 Source Book, Signal. “We’re concerned about Source: “Census deal with U.S. firm <afceaportal.org/sourcebook/ Lockheed Martin’s advocacy of the Star goes through,” Canadian Press, Oct. 9, details.jsp?cid=10001196> Wars program of missile defence,” said 2004. <www.theglobeandmail.com/ 3. Federal Government Procurement Darrell Rankin, an organizer with the No servlet/story/RTGAM.20041009. Conference of the Americas War Coalition in Manitoba. wcens1009/BNStory/National> <www.ccc.ca/fgpca2004.htm> 22 Press for Conversion! (Issue # 57) October 2005 aboard a variety of U.S. warships. ships currently planned.”2 short- and medium-range ballistic According to the U.S. Missile And, according to the website missiles in their midcourse phase. Defense Agency, which oversees the MissileThreat.com, a project of the The system will integrate the most comprehensive weapons devel- right-wing Claremont Institute “devoted U.S. Navy’s existing fleet of Aegis opment program in world history, to understanding and promoting the cruisers (Ticonderoga class) and “The Aegis Weapon System, the ba- requirements for the strategic defense Aegis destroyers (Arleigh Burke sis for the sea-based element of the of the United States,” the AEGIS Bal- class) with the Standard Missile-3 Ballistic Missile Defense System, is listic Missile Defense system (SM-3) interceptor currently under currently deployed on 68 U.S. Navy “will provide an efficient and highly development. The system will allow cruisers and destroyers, with 18 more mobile sea-based defense against the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) Robert J. U.S. war industry giant, Lockheed Stevens Martin, is responsible for the AEGIS Combat System. AEGIS is the backbone of the U.S. Navy’s “missile defense” weapons program. Lockheed Martin Canada is supplying the U.S. with the AEGIS interactive training and simulation system called VISTA. Pres. and CEO, Lockheed Martin Lockheed Martin: Fox in the Hen House By Tim Weiner ockheed Martin doesn’t run the LUnited States. But it does help run a breath-takingly big part of it. Over the last decade, Lockheed Martin, the nation’s largest military con- VISTA tractor, has built a formidable informa- tion-technology empire that now was paid for and developed by stretches from the Pentagon to the post Canadian taxpayers. It is now the office. It sorts the mail and totals the system of choice for preparing taxes. It cuts Social Security checks and U.S. Navy personnel to use counts the U.S. census. It runs space their AEGIS weapons systems. flights and monitors air traffic. To make all that happen, Lockheed Martin writes military-industrial complex. It is increas- raise some questions. more computer code than Microsoft. ingly putting its stamp on the nation’s Former Lockheed executives, Of course, Lockheed Martin is military policies, too. lobbyists and lawyers hold crucial best known for its weapons, which are Lockheed stands at “the inter- White House and Pentagon posts, pick- the heart of America’s arsenal. It builds section of policy and technology,” and ing weapons and setting policies. most of the nation’s warplanes. It cre- that “is really a very interesting place,” “It’s impossible to tell where the ates rockets for nuclear missiles, sen- said its CEO, Robert J. Stevens, a government ends and Lockheed be- sors for spy satellites and scores of tightly-wound former Marine.[Editor’s gins,” said Danielle Brian of Project on other military and intelligence systems. note: He’s also a Director of Monsanto.] Government Oversight, a nonprofit The Pentagon and the Central Intelli- “We are deployed entirely in develop- group in Washington DC that monitors gence Agency might have difficulty ing daunting technology,” he said, and government contracts. “The fox isn’t functioning without its expertise. that requires “thinking through the guarding the henhouse. He lives there.” But in the post-9/11 world, policy dimensions of national security Source: “Lockheed and the Future of Lockheed Martin has become more as well as technological dimensions.” Warfare,” New York Times, November than just the biggest corporate cog in To critics, however, Lockheed 28, 2004. what Dwight D. Eisenhower called the Martin’s deep ties with the Pentagon October 2005 (Issue # 57) Press for Conversion! 23 to move its defense capabilities close The NSWCDD’s “Visitor Infor- tor of the Joint Staff’s Joint Theater Air to enemy launch sites, thus provid- mation” webpage proudly notes that is and Missile Defense Organization, in ing a critical ‘layer’ to the broader now “at the forefront of naval science Washington, D.C. (And, he also com- Ballistic Missile Defense System.”3 and engineering” when it comes to a mands another center for weapons test- long list of weapons programs, includ- ing and training, the Center for Surface VISTA: ing “theater ballistic missile defense.”5 Combat Systems.8) The AEGIS Training System When the NSWCDD procured The NSWCDD/ATRC gave LM Of course, LM Canada’s VISTA is also VISTA from LM Canada, it did so “on Canada the AEGIS weapons-training an acronym. It stands for “Visual Inter- behalf of the AEGIS Training and Readi- contract on a “non-competitive,” “sole active Simulated Training Application.” ness Center” (ATRC) in Dahlgren, Vir- source basis.” This means no other Since 1998, LM Canada has been the ginia.6 Like the centre of a bull’s eye corporations—American, Canadian or sole-source supplier of the VISTA for target, the ATRC is a “center” for weap- otherwise—could bid for the contract.
Recommended publications
  • Sector Fact Sheet
    Ottawa Engage our Aerospace, Canada’s Capital Defence and Security Ottawa is a global hub for fundamental and Sector applied research, ground-breaking Ottawa has more than 300 companies innovations, and disruptive products and actively engaged in aerospace, defence services that are in demand across the and security – from smaller, niche, globe. As the seat of the Federal companies, to multinational giants government, Ottawa is home to federal including Lockheed-Martin, General departments and agencies, more than 65 Dynamics, Thales and Raytheon. This research labs and over 130 embassies and diverse sector offers expertise in C4ISR, consulates. With a deep history of innovation robotics, unmanned aerial vehicles, high that spans over 100 years, today’s present- performance cybersecurity solutions, day technology ecosystem is driving personal protection, interoperable research in emerging fields such as technologies for first responders and autonomous vehicles, artificial intelligence, military end-users, CBRNE protection, cybersecurity and precision agriculture. This maintenance and monitoring, sub-systems dynamic and urban city is surrounding by an and support. As the home to the abundance of natural beauty that offers an Department of National Defence, affordable and unparalleled quality of life. Canadian Security and Intelligence Service, Public Safety Canada, Canadian Air Transport Security Authority, Royal National Canadian Mounted Police, Capital Region Communications Security Establishment Population 1,324,000 Canada and Canada
    [Show full text]
  • HCM/FELEX Backgrounder • Behind-The-Scenes: Project Perspectives and Lessons Learned • Valuable Industry Insights New Sea Legs for Canada's Navy Frigates
    National Défense Defence nationale Maritime Engineering 82 Journal Since 1982 March 2017 Canada’s Naval Technical Forum SPECIAL EDITION Halifax-Class Modernization / Frigate Life Extension Project In this Issue: • HCM/FELEX Backgrounder • Behind-the-scenes: Project Perspectives and Lessons Learned • Valuable Industry Insights New Sea Legs for Canada's Navy Frigates HMCS Montréal (FFH-336) in mid-life refit at Irving Shipbuilding's Halifax Shipyard MARITIME ENGINEERING JOURNAL NO. 82 (MARCH 2017) SPECIAL EDITION – HCM/FELEX Maritime Engineering 82 (Established 1982) Journal March 2017 Commodore’s Corner Teamwork, Trust and Respect Redefined ................................................................................................ 2 Project Perspectives Director General A First for the Maritime Engineering Journal .................................................................................3 Maritime Equipment Program #Teamwork .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Management HCM/FELEX: An important Chapter in Canada's Naval Technical History .........................4 Commodore Simon Page, Technology and Teamwork – Keys to Sucess .................................................................................5 OMM, CD Backgrounder – HCM/FELEX .........................................................................................................6 HCM: A Successful Program .............................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Military Journal
    CANADIAN MILITARY JOURNAL Vol. 17, No. 1, Winter 2016 Vol. 17, No. 1, Winter 2016 CONTENTS 3 EDITOR’S CORNER 4 LETTER TO THE EDITOR CANADA’S MILITARY OF TOMORROW 5 Core Competencies and the Army: A Complex yet Potentially Rewarding Relationship Cover by Christopher Young A CC-177 Globemaster III 15 From an International Strategy to Tactical Actions: aircraft prepares to land How Canada Could Run Campaigns at Thule Air Force Base, by Erick Simoneau Greenland, after dropping off 25 Simple Changes, Strategic Gain: equipment at Canadian Forces The Case for Personnel Recovery in Canada Base Alert during Operation by James Pierotti Boxtop, 30 September 2016. Credit: DND photo TN11-2016-0804-018 PERSONNEL ISSUES by Corporal Ryan Moulton 38 Reflections of a Liaison Officer by James McKay MILITARY HISTORY 47 Canadian Infantry in North Africa, January–May 1943 by R. Daniel Pellerin 57 The Missiles of Anadyr: Soviet Cold War Plans That Could Have Included the Destruction of RCAF Station Comox, 1962–1969 by Sean M. Maloney VIEWS AND OPINIONS 68 150 Years of Military History in Downtown Montreal Core Competencies and by Diane Joly the Army: A Complex yet 75 Poland’s Choice for Patriot Potentially Rewarding by Debalina Ghoshal Relationship COMMENTARY 79 Maritime Futures Revisited by Martin Shadwick 84 BOOK REVIEWS From an International Strategy to Tactical Actions: How Canada Could Run Campaigns Canadian Military Journal/Revue militaire canadienne is the official professional journal of the Canadian Armed Forces and the Department of National Defence. It is published quarterly under authority of the Minister of National Defence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lockheed-Martin Multi-Function Workstation
    PATRON H.R.H. THE PRINCE PHILIP DUKE OF EDINBURGH OTTAWA BRANCH THE NAVAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA Box 505, Station B, Ottawa, ON K1P 5P6 “To make all levels of Government and the general public clearly aware of the vital need for, and value of adequate and effective Maritime security forces to protect and further the interests of Canada.” (Branch Constitution, Article III.) 45.02 “Trying the depth of the water and the quality of the bottom line.…” November 2009 The Lockheed-Martin Multi-Function Workstation See the cover story on the Halifax Class Modernization starting on page 5 Soundings November 2009 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ From the President By Bob Bush necessary to help share the load. In this edition… I am committed to the ongoing renewal of the NOAC, set in motion with P2. President’s Remarks the acceptance of the Fowler Report and being P.3 Editor’s Desk well-guided in its implementation with P.3 SLt Down Part 13 Richard Archer at the helm. P.5 Halifax Class This initiative is essential to the longevity of the NOAC. Modernization Dear Branch Members, Further, I can think of no P.8 SHINPADS better way to commence the As the new second 100 years of naval P.9 Entertainment News President, I have the service than to provide privilege to be involved in serving and retired officers P.10 CNAG an exciting time for the with a relevant and engaged NOAC. With the Navy’s social and professional P.11 NOAC Conference Centennial celebrations, association. In this light, I 2010 which kicked off in October value the relationship that this year and will extend we have built with the P.12 Branch Meeting into 2010, we of the naval Society of Naval Architects P.13 Naval Aviation RV community will have an and Marine Engineers excellent opportunity to (SNAME).
    [Show full text]
  • Role Mana of Cog Ageme Gnition Ent Sys N in a F Stem Future Naval C Combat
    CAN UNCLASSIFIED Role of cognition in a future naval combat management system Dr. Anthony M. Ponsford Prepared by: Anthony M. Ponsford, Consultant, c/o Breckenhill, Inc., 305 Breckenridge Cres., Ottawa ON K2W 1J3 PSPC Contract Number: W7714-4501667362 Technical Authority: Peter Moo Contractor's date of publication: March 2018 Defence Research and Development Canada Contract Report DRDC-RDDC-2018-C070 September 2018 CAN UNCLASSIFIED CAN UNCLASSIFIED IMPORTANT INFORMATIVE STATEMENTS This document was reviewed for Controlled Goods by Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) using the Schedule to the Defence Production Act. Disclaimer: This document is not published by the Editorial Office of Defence Research and Development Canada, an agency of the Department of National Defence of Canada but is to be catalogued in the Canadian Defence Information System (CANDIS), the national repository for Defence S&T documents. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Department of National Defence) makes no representations or warranties, expressed or implied, of any kind whatsoever, and assumes no liability for the accuracy, reliability, completeness, currency or usefulness of any information, product, process or material included in this document. Nothing in this document should be interpreted as an endorsement for the specific use of any tool, technique or process examined in it. Any reliance on, or use of, any information, product, process or material included in this document is at the sole risk of the person so using it or relying on it. Canada does not assume any liability in respect of any damages or losses arising out of or in connection with the use of, or reliance on, any information, product, process or material included in this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Filed March 9, 2001 United States SECURITIES and EXCHANGE
    Filed March 9, 2001 United States SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ______________ Form 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000 Commission file number 1-11437 LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Maryland 52-1893632 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 6801 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20817-1877 (301/897-6000) (Address and telephone number of principal executive offices) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Name of each exchange Title of Each Class on which registered ------------------- --------------------- Common Stock, $1 par value New York Stock Exchange, Inc. 8 1/8% Cumulative Monthly New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Income Preferred Securities of COMSAT Capital I, L.P. Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Page 1 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if the disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 or Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K [x] State the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Navy's Type 26 Frigate Program Moving Ahead
    ROYAL NAVY’S TYPE 26 FRIGATE PROGRAM MOVING AHEAD – AND CANADA JOINS IN. Source : Kym Bergmann APDR 25 October 2018 Until the future submarine program enters its construction phase several years from now, the biggest acquisition on the RAN’s books by far is the future frigate purchase, which has a budget of $35 billion. After a detailed evaluation there was a clear winner, with the BAE Systems bid being judged the one most clearly in Australia’s national interest. Contrary to some rumours at the time, the Department of Defence and the Navy were always solidly behind this proposal and the submission to Cabinet only required fine tuning on matters of detail. On October 19, the Canadian Government announced that it was also buying the Type 26 – the design being offered by successful combat system integrator, the local subsidiary of Lockheed Martin. Canada is looking for up to 15 frigates, which means the Type 26 will certainly be the most successful – and capable – non‐US frigate in the Western world, with the construction of around 30, albeit in different configurations depending on customer and local industry requirements. For BAE Systems to be almost simultaneously successful in the UK, Australia and Canada is a remarkable achievement – due in no small part to the support of the Royal Navy as well as being in the “sweet spot” on the design and manufacturing curve. Having said that, while contract negotiations with Australia are almost complete and seem uncontroversial, BAE Systems along with Lockheed Martin still need to go through the same process with the Canadian Government – and that is expected to take until the end of March 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Circumpolar Military Facilities of the Arctic Five
    CIRCUMPOLAR MILITARY FACILITIES OF THE ARCTIC FIVE Ernie Regehr, O.C. Senior Fellow in Arctic Security and Defence The Simons Foundation Canada and Michelle Jackett, M.A. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Circumpolar Military Facilities of the Arctic Five – updated: July 2018 Ernie Regehr, O.C., and Michelle Jackett, M.A. Circumpolar Military Facilities of the Arctic Five Introduction This compilation of current military facilities in the circumpolar region1 continues to be offered as an aid to addressing a key question posed by the Canadian Senate more than five years ago: “Is the [Arctic] region again becoming militarized?”2 If anything, that question has become more interesting and relevant in the intervening years, with commentators divided on the meaning of the demonstrably accelerated military developments in the Arctic – some arguing that they are primarily a reflection of increasing military responsibilities in aiding civil authorities in surveillance and search and rescue, some noting that Russia’s increasing military presence is consistent with its need to respond to increased risks of things like illegal resource extraction, terrorism, and disasters along its frontier and the northern sea route, and others warning that the Arctic could indeed be headed once again for direct strategic confrontation.3 While a simple listing of military bases, facilities, and equipment, either based
    [Show full text]
  • 1996 Annual Report
    s Highlight (In millions, except per share data) 1996(a) 1995 l Net sales $26,875 $22,853 Net earnings 1,347(b) 682(c) Earnings per common share, assuming full dilution 6.04(b) 3.05(c) Cash dividends per common share 1.60 1.34 Total assets 29,257 17,558 Short-term borrowings 1,110 — Current maturities of long-term debt 180 722 Financia Long-term debt 10,188 3,010 Shareholders' equity 6,856 6,433 Negotiated backlog 50,406 41,125 To Our Shareholders See Notes 1, 2, 4, 8, 10 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. s 2 10 Operating Companies (a) Amounts include the effects of the April 1996 business combination with Loral Corporation. Operating Highlights (b) Earnings for 1996 include the effects of a nonrecurring pretax gain of $365 Content 16 Space & Strategic Missiles million resulting from divestitures which increased net earnings by $351 million, or $1.58 per common share assuming full dilution. The gain was substantially 22 Electronics offset by nonrecurring pretax charges, net of state income tax benefits, of 30 Information & Services $307 million, approximately one-half of which related to the Corporation's 40 Aeronautics conservative strategy toward its environmental remediation business, with the remainder related to a number of other corporate actions to improve efficiency, 46 Energy & Environment increase competitiveness and focus on core businesses. These charges decreased net earnings by $209 million, or $.94 per common share assuming full dilution. 50 Financial Section (c) Earnings for 1995 include the effects of pretax charges totaling $690 million 86 Corporate Directory for merger related and consolidation expenses.
    [Show full text]
  • Lockheed Martin Executives and Their Salaries
    P r o f il e e profile t a r T he Weapons Manufacturer T hat Does it All: A P r of ile of Arms Giant po L ockheed Mar tin r o c p November 2005 r P r epar ed by Richard Gir ar d P olar is Institute R esear cher o f il e corporate Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................1 Chapter One: Organizational Profile ............................................................................3 1.1 Lockheed Martin Executives and their Salaries ....................................................3 1.2 Board of Directors ...................................................................................................4 1.3 Business Areas........................................................................................................5 1.4 Operational Divisions..............................................................................................6 1.5 Three Prongs ...........................................................................................................6 1.6 University Links.....................................................................................................11 Chapter Two: Economic Profile..................................................................................13 2.1 Financial Data ........................................................................................................13 2.2 Sales by Customer ................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Clients of Compliance Training Online®
    Corporate Clients of Compliance Training Online® 'Round The Clock Service Inc Knox Excavating LLC 0906454 British Columbia Ltd Knudsen Construction 1st Choice Aerospace Knutsen Dental Solutions 1st National Bank KO Construction 1 Stop Pool Pros Inc Koalatech Restoration 1 Sun Solar Electric KOARTAN Microelectronic Interconnect Materials 1-855-Fix-Light Koasati Construction Management 10 Federal Kobus Construction USA Inc 10 Tanker Air Carrier LLC Koch Logistics 15 Lightyears Inc Koch-Gitsch Canada LP 10000 Lakes Archaeology Inc Kocharian Company 100 Kocsis Scaffolding Systems 101 Industries Ltd KODA Care 1010 Kodak Polychrome Graphics 101083514 Sk Ltd Kodiak Carbonic LLC 1027622 AB LTD Kodiak Environmental Contracting LLC 1071 Industries LLC Kodiak Steel 11 Bravo Restoration Kodru Equipment 123 Engineering Inc Koeppel Nissan 1258995 Alberta Ltd Koffler Electrical Mechanical 126959 Alberta Ltd KOGAP Enterprises Inc 1339352 Alberta Ltd Koh Young Technology Inc 1592118 Alberta Ltd Koham LLC 1668422 Alberta Ltd Koi Tattoo 1669753 Alberta Ltd Kolb Electric 16x9 Inc Kolb Grading LLC 1736394 Alberta Ltd KO Manufacturing Inc 18 Karat Inc Komline-Sanderson 1 1841843 Alberta Ltd KONE Corporation 1849440 Alberta Ltd Kone Elevator Company 1991 Konecranes 1993 Kongsberg Automotive 1st Business Solutions Konopka Electric LLC 1st Class Home Inspection Konwinski Construction 1st Freight KOO Construction 1st In Fire & Safety LLC Kooima Company 2Brothers Contracting LLC Koontz Electric 2 Griffins Inc Koopman Roofing 2 H&V CONSTRUCTION Kope Logistics 2-Way Communications
    [Show full text]
  • Lockheed Martin Study of Economic Impact in Canada
    April, 2018 Lockheed Martin Study of Economic Impact in Canada www.pwc.com/ca Contents 1. Executive summary 1 2. Introduction 5 3. Company overview 7 4. Economic footprint, 2008–2017 17 5. Downstream impacts 21 6. Research and Development activities 23 7. Industry perspective and clusters 29 8. Lockheed Martin Canada’s workforce 38 9. Lockheed Martin Canada’s Corporate Social Responsibility 42 10. Summary of major findings and conclusion 45 Appendices A. Glossary B. References C. Input output methodology D. Limitations This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, its members, employees and agents do not accept or assume any liability, responsibility or duty of care for any consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information contained in this publication or for any decision based on it. 1. Executive summary Lockheed Martin Canada has a corporate vision Lockheed Martin Corporation began operating that aligns with the Government of Canada’s focus in Canada in 1937. This led to the establishment on achieving sustainable growth for the Canadian of Lockheed Martin Canada, with its head office economy through innovation and exports, and is based in Ottawa. Lockheed Martin Canada committed to deploying its resources in a manner represents all of Lockheed Martin Corporation’s that will increase new skills development.
    [Show full text]