Key Performance Indicators in Public-Private Partnerships: a State-Of-The-Practice Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Key Performance Indicators in Public-Private Partnerships: a State-Of-The-Practice Report Key Performance Indicators in Public-Private Partnerships A State-of-the-Practice Report AUSTRALIA BRITISH COLUMBIA NEW ZEALAND UNITED KINGDOM UNITED STATES Sponsored by: In cooperation with: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials National Cooperative Highway Research Program March 2011 International Technology Scanning Program NOTICE The Federal Highway Administration provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that pro- motes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-PL-10-029 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Key Performance Indicators in March 2011 Public-Private Partnerships 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Michael Garvin, Keith Molenaar, Desiderio Navarro, Gordon Proctor 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) American Trade Initiatives 11. Contract or Grant No. P.O. Box 8228 Alexandria, VA 22306-8228 DTFH61-99-C-005 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Office of International Programs Federal Highway Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code U.S. Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials 15. Supplementary Notes FHWA COTR: Hana Maier, Office of International Programs 16. Abstract This report provides a state-of-the-practice description of domestic and international practices for key performance indicators (KPIs) in public-private partnerships (PPPs). The report is based on a comprehensive literature review and eight case studies from Australia, British Columbia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The concept for this report came from an implementation strategy in Public-Private Partnerships for Highway Infrastructure: Capitalizing on International Experience, as well as Linking Transportation Performance and Accountability and Construction Management Practices in Canada and Europe. The report identifies how government-developed performance measures reflecting societal goals such as congestion management or environmental impact are translated through KPIs and included in project documents for designing, constructing, operating, and maintaining transportation facilities. The report shows that it is possible to align projects with these higher goals. The findings are applicable to agencies that wish to align overarching organizational and societal performance measures through KPIs not only to PPP projects, but also to conventionally bid projects. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement key performance indicator, performance measure, No restrictions. This document is available to the public-private partnership, tollroad, transportation public from the: Office of International Programs, asset measurement FHWA-HPIP, Room 3325, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC 20590 [email protected] www.international.fhwa.dot.gov 19. Security Classify. (of this report) 20. Security Classify. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 120 Free Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized Key Performance Indicators in Public-Private Partnerships This work was sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration Offices of Innovative Program Delivery, Asset Management, and International Programs. The topic was identified in the International Scanning Program report Public-Private Partnerships for Highway Infrastructure: Capitalizing on International Experience as a key implementation item. Review Panel Research Team Jan Weingart Brown (FHWA) Keith Molenaar (University of Colorado) Steven DeWitt (North Carolina Turnpike Authority) Michael Garvin (Virginia Tech) Roger Driskell (Illinois DOT) Gordon Proctor (Proctor and Associates) Ted Ferragut (TDC Partners) Desiderio Navarro (University of Colorado) Leon E. Hank (Michigan DOT) Steve Gaj (FHWA) Dusty Holcombe (Virginia DOT) Bob Pieplow (CalTrans) Michael Saunders (FHWA) Jeff Seiders (Texas DOT) Art Smith (National Council for Public-Private Partnerships) Jerry Yakowenko (FHWA) International Technology Scanning Program The International Technology Scanning Program, The International Technology Scanning Program has sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration resulted in significant improvements and savings in (FHWA), the American Association of State Highway road program technologies and practices throughout and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), and the the United States. In some cases, scan studies have National Cooperative Highway Research Program facilitated joint research and technology-sharing (NCHRP), evaluates innovative foreign technologies projects with international counterparts, further and practices that could significantly benefit U.S. conserving resources and advancing the state of the highway transportation systems. This approach art. Scan studies have also exposed transportation allows for advanced technology to be adapted and put professionals to remarkable advancements and into practice much more efficiently without spending inspired implementation of hundreds of innovations. scarce research funds to re-create advances already The result: large savings of research dollars and time, developed by other countries. as well as significant improvements in the Nation’s transportation system. FHWA and AASHTO, with recommendations from NCHRP, jointly determine priority topics for teams Scan reports can be obtained through FHWA free of U.S. experts to study. Teams in the specific areas of charge by e-mailing [email protected]. Scan being investigated are formed and sent to countries reports are also available electronically and can be where significant advances and innovations have accessed on the FHWA Office of International Pro- been made in technology, management practices, grams Web site at www.international.fhwa.dot.gov. organizational structure, program delivery, and financing. Scan teams usually include representa- tives from FHWA, State departments of transporta- tion, local governments, transportation trade and research groups, the private sector, and academia. After a scan is completed, team members evaluate findings and develop comprehensive reports, includ- ing recommendations for further research and pilot projects to verify the value of adapting innovations for U.S. use. Scan reports, as well as the results of pilot programs and research, are circulated throughout the country to State and local transportation officials and the private sector. Since 1990, more than 85 international scans have been organized on topics such as pavements, bridge construction and mainte- nance, contracting, intermodal transport, organiza- tional management, winter road maintenance, safety, intelligent transportation systems, planning, and policy. IV International Technology Scan Reports International Technology Scanning Program: Bringing Global Innovations to U.S. Highways SAFETY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT Assuring Bridge Safety and Serviceability in Europe Reducing Congestion and Funding Transportation (2010) Using Road Pricing In Europe and Singapore (2010) Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety and Mobility in Europe Linking Transportation Performance and (2010) Accountability (2010) Improving Safety and Mobility for Older Road Users Streamlining and Integrating Right-of-Way and Utility in Australia and Japan (2008) Processes With Planning, Environmental, and Design Processes in Australia and Canada (2009) Safety Applications of Intelligent Transportation Systems in Europe and Japan (2006) Active Travel Management: The Next Step in Congestion Management (2007) Traffic Incident Response Practices in Europe (2006) Managing Travel Demand: Applying European Underground Transportation Systems in Europe: Perspectives to U.S. Practice (2006) Safety, Operations, and Emergency Response (2006) Transportation Asset Management in Australia, Roadway Human Factors and Behavioral Safety in Canada, England, and New Zealand (2005) Europe (2005) Transportation Performance Measures in Australia, Traffic Safety Information Systems in Europe and Canada, Japan, and New Zealand (2004) Australia (2004) European Right-of-Way and Utilities Best Practices Signalized Intersection Safety in Europe (2003) (2002) Managing and Organizing Comprehensive Highway Geometric Design Practices for European Roads Safety in Europe (2003) (2002) European Road Lighting Technologies (2001) Wildlife Habitat Connectivity Across European Commercial Vehicle Safety, Technology, and Practice Highways (2002) in Europe (2000) Sustainable Transportation Practices in Europe (2001) Methods and Procedures to Reduce Motorist Delays Recycled Materials in European Highway in European Work Zones (2000) Environments (1999) Innovative Traffic Control Technology and Practice European Intermodal Programs: Planning, Policy, in Europe (1999) and Technology (1999) Road Safety Audits—Final Report and Case Studies National Travel Surveys (1994) (1997) Speed Management and Enforcement Technology: Europe and Australia (1996) POLICY AND INFORMATION Safety Management Practices in Japan, Australia, Transportation Research Program Administration and New Zealand (1995) in Europe and Asia (2009) Pedestrian
Recommended publications
  • Storm Data Publication
    FEBRUARY 2008 VOLUME 50 SSTORMTORM DDATAATA NUMBER 2 AND UNUSUAL WEATHER PHENOMENA WITH LATE REPORTS AND CORRECTIONS NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION noaa NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICE NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER, ASHEVILLE, NC Cover: This cover represents a few weather conditions such as snow, hurricanes, tornadoes, heavy rain and flooding that may occur in any given location any month of the year. (Photos courtesy of NCDC) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Outstanding Storm of the Month …..…………….….........……..…………..…….…..…..... 4 Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena ....…….…....…………...…...........…............ 5 Reference Notes .............……...........................……….........…..….…............................................ 278 STORM DATA (ISSN 0039-1972) National Climatic Data Center Editor: William Angel Assistant Editors: Stuart Hinson and Rhonda Herndon STORM DATA is prepared, and distributed by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena narratives and Hurricane/Tropical Storm summaries are prepared by the National Weather Service. Monthly and annual statistics and summaries of tornado and lightning events re- sulting in deaths, injuries, and damage are compiled by the National Climatic Data Center and the National Weather Service’s (NWS) Storm Prediction Center. STORM DATA contains all confi rmed information on storms available to our staff at the time of publication. Late reports and corrections will be printed in each edition. Except for limited editing to correct grammatical errors, the data in Storm Data are published as received. Note: “None Reported” means that no severe weather occurred and “Not Received” means that no reports were received for this region at the time of printing.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Patrol Handbook
    FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION SERVICE PATROL HANDBOOK November 2008 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the department of transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document. i Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-HOP-08-031 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Service Patrol Handbook November 2008 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Nancy Houston, Craig Baldwin, Andrea Vann Easton, Steve Cyra, P.E., P.T.O.E., Marc Hustad, P.E., Katie Belmore, EIT 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Booz Allen Hamilton HNTB Corporation 8283 Greensboro Drive 11414 West Park Place, Suite 300 McLean, Virginia 22102 Milwaukee, WI 53224 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration, HOTO-1 Final Report U. S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D. C. 20590 HOTO, FHWA 15. Supplementary Notes Paul Sullivan, FHWA Office of Operations, Office of Transportation Operations, Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR). Handbook development was performed under contract to Booz Allen Hamilton. 16. Abstract This Handbook provides an overview of the Full-Function Service Patrol (FFSP) and describes desired program characteristics from the viewpoint of an agency that is responsible for funding, managing, and operating the services.
    [Show full text]
  • Yankees Pull All-Nighter, Beat Reds 10-4
    SECTION B VISIT SAMOA NEWS ONLINE @ SAMOANEWS.COM TUESDAY MAY 09, 2017 CLASSIFIEDS • CARTOONS • ALOHA BRIEFS & MORE ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ No snoozing: 2 C headline text goes in C M Y K Yankees pull the box here all-nighter, beat Reds 10-4 CINCINNATI (AP) — The streak. Yankees know how to pull an “That’s a big boost for them,” all-nighter and come up aces. Reds manager Bryan Price said. Brett Gardner and Matt “They play 18 innings, and then Holliday homered, Masahiro their starter goes seven. That Tanaka won his fifth consecu- puts them in a lot better shape tive start and New York shook for tomorrow.” off a long game and a short Gary Sanchez got the Yan- night’s sleep, beating the Cin- kees going with his bases-loaded cinnati Reds 10-4 on Monday single in the first off Rookie night for its sixth victory in a Davis (1-2), a former Yankees row. prospect. Didi Gregorius also The Yankees have the best drove in a pair off Davis, who record in the majors at 21-9 and went to the Reds in the trade for are 12 games over .500 for the closer Aroldis Chapman after first time since the end of the the 2015 season. 2015 season. Gardner and Holliday con- Better yet, they were awake nected in the eighth inning as to enjoy all of it. the Yankees pulled away. New York Yankees shortstop Didi Gregorius, center left, second baseman Starlin Castro, center, “Guys were really fatigued,” There were some sloppy and third baseman Ronald Torreyes, right, celebrate after closing the ninth inning of a baseball manager Joe Girardi said.
    [Show full text]
  • Value for Money Analysis I-595 Corridor Roadway Improvements
    I-595 Corridor Roadway Improvements Value for Money Analysis Table of Contents Table of Contents 0. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 2 1. Project Background ................................................................................................................. 4 1.1. Project History .................................................................................................................. 4 1.2. Location ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.3. Scope ................................................................................................................................ 6 2. Selection of Funding and Contracting Method ....................................................................... 7 2.1. FDOT’s goals ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Funding and Contracting Methods .................................................................................. 7 2.3. Basis for Initial Value for Money Analysis in 2007 ........................................................... 9 3. Procurement Process ............................................................................................................ 13 3.1. Procurement Structure .................................................................................................. 13 3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • I N V E S T I N G
    INVESTING IN Program Highlights | 2016 1 INVESTING IN The SIS n 2003, the Florida Legislature and Governor established the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) to enhance Florida’s transportation mobility and Ieconomic competitiveness. The SIS is a statewide network of high-priority transportation facilities, including the State’s largest and most significant WHAT IS THE airports, spaceports, deep-water seaports, freight rail terminals, passenger rail and intercity bus terminals, rail corridors, waterways and highways. These facilities represent the state’s primary means for moving people and freight between Florida’s diverse regions, as well as between Florida and other states STRATEGIC and nations. SIS Facilities are designated through the use of objective criteria and thresholds based on quantitative measures of transportation and economic activity. These facilities meet high levels of people and goods movement and INTERMODAL generally support major flows of interregional, interstate, and international travel and commerce. Facilities that do not yet meet the established criteria and thresholds for SIS designation, but are expected to in the future are referred to as Emerging SIS. These facilities experience lower levels of people SYSTEM? and goods movement but demonstrate strong potential for future growth and development. The designated SIS and Emerging SIS includes 17 commercial service airports, two spaceports, 12 public seaports, over 2,300 miles of rail corridors, over 2,200 miles of waterways, 34 passenger terminals, seven rail freight terminals, and over 4,600 miles of highways. These hubs, corridors and connectors are the fundamental structure which satisfies the transportation needs of travelers and visitors, supports the movement of freight, and provides transportation links to external markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Availability Payment Or Revenue-Risk P3 Concessions? Pros and Cons for Highway Infrastructure
    Reason Foundation Policy Study No. 458 November 2017 Availability Payment or Revenue-Risk P3 Concessions? Pros and Cons for Highway Infrastructure by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Reason Foundation Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frame- works and actions of policymakers, journalists and opinion leaders. Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, compe- tition and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and progress. Reason produces rigorous, peer-reviewed research and directly engages the policy process, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowl- edge and results. Through practical and innovative approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individuals and voluntary institutions to flourish. Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization as defined under IRS code 501(c)(3). Reason Foundation is supported by voluntary contribu- tions from individuals, foundations and corporations. The views are those of the author, not necessarily those of Reason Foundation or its trustees. Photo credit: © Lev Kropotov | Dreamstime Copyright © 2017, Reason Foundation. All rights reserved. Reason Foundation Availability Payment or Revenue-Risk P3 Concessions? Pros and Cons for Highway Infrastructure by Robert W. Poole, Jr. Executive Summary Over the past two decades, the U.S. highway sector has seen the introduction and use of a new method of procurement: the long-term public-private partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECTIONS to OUR MIAMI OFFICE 777 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1370 Miami, FL 33131 Phone: 786-725-4120 Fax: 786-725-4121
    DIRECTIONS TO OUR MIAMI OFFICE 777 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1370 Miami, FL 33131 Phone: 786-725-4120 Fax: 786-725-4121 Via Public Transit 777 Brickell Avenue can be reached from Miami International Airport and many locations via the Miami-Dade Transit Metrorail System. The Metrorail system is a 25-mile dual track, elevated rapid transit system that provides service to Miami International Airport (MIA) and runs from Kendall through South Miami, Coral Gables, and downtown Miami; to the Civic Center/Jackson Memorial Hospital area; and to Brownsville, Liberty City, Hialeah, and Medley in northwest Miami-Dade, with connections to Broward and Palm Beach counties at the Tri-Rail/Metrorail transfer station. The 23 accessible Metrorail stations are about one mile apart, providing easy access for bus riders, pedestrians, and passengers who are dropped off and picked up. From the Airport via Metrorail o Take the MIA Mover from the airport to the Miami-Dade Metrorail. o Once you arrive at the Metrorail take the Orange Line, southbound, to the Brickell stop. o Cross SW 1st Avenue and proceed down SW 10th Street for 3 blocks, continuing past Brickell Plaza to Brickell Avenue. o Once you arrive at Brickell, cross the intersection to the opposite side of the street and take a right. o 777 Brickell is approximately 1 – 2 blocks on your right hand side. o The building is on the corner of Brickell Avenue and SE 8 St. (Tamiami Trail) Via Metrorail in General o Take the Miami-Dade Metrorail (orange line or green line) to the Brickell stop.
    [Show full text]
  • Public–Private Partnership Concessions for Highway Projects: a Primer Quality Assurance Statement
    Public–Private Partnership Concessions for Highway Projects: A Primer Quality Assurance Statement The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) provides high quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 3 Chapter 2: How Does A P3 Concession Work? 4 Concession Goals—Public Perspective 4 Why Do Public Agencies Enter into P3 Concessions? 4 Increase Up-Front Financing Through Private Equity 5 Make Greater Total Debt Capacity Available Through Private Structure 5 Share Revenue and Risks with the Private Sector 5 Provide Incentives for Better Asset Management and On-Time and On-Budget Delivery 6 Concession Goals—Private Perspective 6 Concession Compensation—Basic Options 6 Toll and Project Revenues (from Project to Private Sector) 6 Availability Payments and Performance Payments (from Public to Private Sector) 7 Shadow Tolls (from Public to Private Sector) 7 Up-Front Payment (Private to Public Sector—for a Toll-Based Concession on an Existing Facility) 8 Concession Term—Basic Options 8 Fixed 8 Dynamic 8 Extendable 9 Chapter 3: Who Are the Primary Participants in a P3 Concession, and What Are Their Roles? 10 Primary Public Participants 10 State Legislatures 10 Governors 10 Public Sector Project Sponsor 10
    [Show full text]
  • Interchange Report CONTENTS NOTES Interstates Page Some Interchanges Are Complex
    Florida Department of Transportation Interchange Report CONTENTS NOTES Interstates Page Some interchanges are complex. I-4 2 This listing locates most I-10 3 interchanges at their centers or at I-110 5 the main cross road. It does not I-75 5 attempt to locate individual I-175 7 ramps. I-275 7 I-375 8 Not all of the expressways are I-95 8 operated by the Florida Department I-195 11 of Transportation (FDOT). Some are I-295 11 operated, all or in part, by I-395 12 expressway authorities. I-595 12 Expressways: Florida's Turnpike Page DEFINITIONS Florida's Turnpike Stub—SR-91 13 Florida's Turnpike & Extension—SR-91 and 821 13 Road ID and M.P. (mile point) are identifiers used internally by FDOT. Expressways: Southeast Page Cum. Miles (Cumulative Miles from Airport Expressway—SR-112 15 the start of the roadway) are Dolphin Expressway—SR-836 15 approximately the same as the Dolphin Expressway Extension, East-Bound—SR-836 16 numbers on the small green mile post signs along Interstate highways Dolphin Expressway Extension, West-Bound—SR-836 16 and many expressways. Don Shula Expressway—SR-874 16 Gratigny Parkway—SR-924 16 Road Number is the Interstate, US, Palmetto Expressway—SR-826 16 SR, or CR number (if any) of the cross road(s) at the interchange. Sawgrass Expressway—SR-869 17 Snapper Creek Expressway—SR-878 17 Road Name is the local name of the cross road(s) at the interchange. It Expressways: West-Central Page may be the same road shown with a Lee Roy Selmon-Crosstown Expressway—SR-618 18 Road Number, or it may be a different road.
    [Show full text]
  • Sports Extreme Layout For
    Vol. 5, No. 1 October 12, 2012 SPORTS EXTREME Lafayette Elementary School Washington, D.C. By the Bay or by the Beltway, It’s Baseball, Baby! Orioles: ‘O’ What a Season by Kevin Oakley and Alex Wise, 5JJ It has been 15 years since the Baltimore Orioles had a winning season, and another 15 years since the Orioles made the Wear your Nats or Os’ playoffs. Almost every newspaper, magazine, colors to school every day ESPN site or season poll had one thing in that either team has a playoff game. You don’t common--they all thought the Baltimore Orioles have to choose sides until would be the worst team in the AL East. No, they play each other in the make that the worst team in the AL. World Series! The O's season got off to a great start. During the first few months, they were one of the best teams in the MLB. By June, they started to cool off and were ten games behind the Inside New York Yankees when Jim Johnson started to come up big. Jim is a Postseason Teams........2 special pitcher who only comes into the game in the last inning when the Nats’ Stats................3 Orioles are up by three or less. On Sept. 30, Johnson got his 50th save Cy Young Prediction......4 of the season. Cont’d on P.3 Awesome Mr. T..........5 Cabrera Wins Crown.....6 Washington Nats Win NL East RG3 v. Andrew Luck.....7 by Luke Schauer, 5G Ravens v. Browns.........8 The Washington Nationals won the National League East and NFL Predictions............9 have gone on to defeat the St.
    [Show full text]
  • P15 Layout 1 5/9/17 8:31 PM Page 1
    p15_Layout 1 5/9/17 8:31 PM Page 1 WEDNESDAY, MAY 10, 2017 SPORTS Driver ‘deliberately’ knocked Jiangsu end Adelaide Flood quits Toulouse as Chris Froome off his bicycle United’s campaign Lyon sign S African duo LONDON: Reigning Tour de France champion Chris Froome said yes- ADELAIDE: A late goal from midfielder Ji Xiang clinched a 1-0 win and top TOULOUSE: English fly-half Toby Flood has quit fallen French Top 14 terday he was deliberately knocked off his bicycle by a hit-and-run spot for Jiangsu Suning in the AFC Champions League Group H, ending giants Toulouse by mutual agreement, the club said yesterday. The 31- driver while training in southern France. The British rider posted a pic- Adelaide United’s Asian campaign in Adelaide. Ji scored with a clinical fin- year-old had a year left on his contract but “will not see out his final season ture of his badly damaged bike on Twitter but said he had escaped ish nine minutes from the end of normal time to net the Chinese team’s with the club” which he joined in 2014. The former England international injury. “Just got rammed on purpose by an impatient winner off only their second shot on target for the match. Adelaide, who has played 60 games for Toulouse scoring 337 points. Capped 60 times for driver who followed me onto the pavement!” tweet- needed to win and hope that South Korea’s Jeju United would lose to England, he previously played for Newcastle Falcons and Leicester Tigers.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Florida Regional Transportation Plan FINAL.Indd
    Final Documentation PALM BEACH MPO • BROWARD MPO • MIAMI-DADE MPO Contents Introduction . 6 Development of the Plan . 8 Plan Components Our Region and Trends . 12 Governance Data and Analysis . 14 Development and Review of 2035 Model Inputs Data and Analysis . 16 Travel Patterns and Commuting 2005 Transit Characteristics 2005 Automobile Characteristics 2005–2035 Air/Sea Characteristics Regional Transportation Network . 18 Plan Context . 22 Federal Context State Context Regional Context Local Context 2 Regional Goals . 26 Finances . 30 Financial Snapshot: Funded Projects . 36 Project Highlights Statistics Unfunded Projects . 58 Project Highlights Statistics Freight System . 66 Goals, Objectives, and Policies Identifi cation and Prioritization of Freight Projects Transit . 76 Public Involvement . 78 Public Involvement Conclusion . 80 3 Participants Palm Beach Metropolitan Planning Organization 2300 N. Jog Road, 4th Floor West Palm Beach, Florida 33411-2749 Broward Metropolitan Planning Organization 100 West Cypress Creek Road, Suite 850 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization 111 N.W. First Street , Suite 910 Miami, Florida 33128-1999 4 Funding Partners Legal Information and Project Team and Contact Information The three Southeast Florida MPO’s provided funding for this The preparation of this report has been fi nanced in part fi rst Regional Long Range Transportation Plan: the Palm through grants from the Federal Highway Administration and Beach MPO, the Broward MPO, and the Miami-Dade MPO. Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transporta- tion, under the State Planning and Research Program, Section Other regional partners who particpated in the development 505 [or Metropolitan Planning Program, Section 104(f)] of Title of this plan include: 23, U.S.
    [Show full text]