DOCSLIB.ORG

Storm Data Publication

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Storm Data Publication FEBRUARY 2008 VOLUME 50 SSTORMTORM DDATAATA NUMBER 2 AND UNUSUAL WEATHER PHENOMENA WITH LATE REPORTS AND CORRECTIONS NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION noaa NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE, DATA AND INFORMATION SERVICE NATIONAL CLIMATIC DATA CENTER, ASHEVILLE, NC Cover: This cover represents a few weather conditions such as snow, hurricanes, tornadoes, heavy rain and flooding that may occur in any given location any month of the year. (Photos courtesy of NCDC) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Outstanding Storm of the Month …..…………….….........……..…………..…….…..…..... 4 Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena ....…….…....…………...…...........…............ 5 Reference Notes .............……...........................……….........…..….…............................................ 278 STORM DATA (ISSN 0039-1972) National Climatic Data Center Editor: William Angel Assistant Editors: Stuart Hinson and Rhonda Herndon STORM DATA is prepared, and distributed by the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC), National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information Service (NESDIS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena narratives and Hurricane/Tropical Storm summaries are prepared by the National Weather Service. Monthly and annual statistics and summaries of tornado and lightning events re- sulting in deaths, injuries, and damage are compiled by the National Climatic Data Center and the National Weather Service’s (NWS) Storm Prediction Center. STORM DATA contains all confi rmed information on storms available to our staff at the time of publication. Late reports and corrections will be printed in each edition. Except for limited editing to correct grammatical errors, the data in Storm Data are published as received. Note: “None Reported” means that no severe weather occurred and “Not Received” means that no reports were received for this region at the time of printing. Subscription, pricing, and ordering information is available from: NCDC Subscription Services 310 State Route 956 Building 300 Rocket Center, WV 26726 (866) 742-3322 Toll Free The editor of STORM DATA solicit your help in acquiring photographs (prints or slides; black and white, or color), maps, clippings, etc. of signifi cant or severe weather events (past or present) for use in the “Outstanding Storms of the Month’’ section of STORM DATA. We request our subscribers or other interested persons to mail such items to: Storm Data National Climatic Data Center 151 Patton Avenue Asheville, NC 28801 e-mail: [email protected] Any such items received by the editor will be for use in STORM DATA only. Any other use will be with the per- mission of the owner of said items. Materials will be returned if requested. This is an of cial publication of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and is compiled from information received at the National Climatic Data Center Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5001. Thomas R. Karl Director, National Climatic Data Center 2 Febuary 2008 Tornado Map !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !(!(!( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( 3 !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( !( !(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( EF Scale ! EF0 ! EF1 ! EF2 EF Scale EF0 EF1 EF2 EF3 EF4 EF5 Total ! EF3 Number494519530121 ! EF4 ! EF5 OUTSTANDING STORMS OF THE MONTH THERE IS NO “OUTSTANDING STORM OF THE MONTH” FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2008. 4 Time Path Path Number of Estimated February 2008 Local/ Length Width Persons Damage Location Date Standard (Miles) (Yards) Killed Injured Property Crops Character of Storm ALABAMA, Central ALZ011>015-017> Autauga - Barbour - Bibb - Blount - Bullock - Calhoun - Chambers - Cherokee - Chilton - Clay - Cleburne 050 - Coosa - Dallas - Elmore - Etowah - Fayette - Greene - Hale - Jefferson - Lamar - Lee - Lowndes - Macon - Marengo - Marion - Montgomery - Perry - Pickens - Pike - Randolph - Russell - Shelby - St. Clair - Sumter - Talladega - Tallapoosa - Tuscaloosa - Walker - Winston 01 0000CST 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Drought 29 0600CST Several storm systems across Central Alabama brought limited improvement to the ongoing drought, that had begun in the Spring of 2007. By the end of February, only about 10 percent of Central Alabama remained in Exceptional (D4) Drought. This area was roughly from the cities of Jasper, Birmingham, Pell City, and Piedmont, northward. Most of the remainder of Central Alabama remained in Moderate (D1) to Extreme (D3) Drought. Soil moistures improved to 30 to as much as 70 percent of normal, and stream flows and reservoir levels improved to near normal seasonal levels by the end of the month. Lamar County Beaverton 06 0204CST 5.69 150 0 0 50.00K 0.00K Tornado (EF1) 0211CST The tornado touched down just southwest of the town of Beaverton, along US-278, and then tracked northeast from there. The metal roof of the Beaverton Post Office was blown off, and City Hall also sustained roof damage. Also in Beaverton, two trains were stranded on the tracks due to a power outage. The conductors were aware of the tornado warnings because they said they heard the tornado sirens about 20 minutes before the storm hit. One of the railroad personnel apparently witnessed the tornado. Elsewhere along the path, several hardwood trees were uprooted and many more softwood trees were snapped off. A few homes suffered significant damage from downed trees, and a few roads were temporarily closed due to the fallen trees. The tornado continued into Marion County. Marion County 2 WNW Guin 06 0211CST 1.61 50 0 0 20.00K 0.00K Tornado (EF0) 0213CST The tornado that touched down in Lamar County moved into southern Marion County, near CR-16 northwest of Guin. It continued to move northeastward for about another mile and a half, and lifted just before it reached US-43 north of Guin. In Marion County, the tornado blew down several trees, at least one of which landed on and destroyed a barn. Pickens County 7 SE Palmetto 06 0242CST 0 0 3.00K 0.00K Thunderstorm Wind (50EG) Trees were blown down near AL-159 and Zion Road, north of Gordo. Fayette County 2 E Newtonville 06 0251CST 6.56 1000 0 0 100.00K 0.00K Tornado (EF2) 7 SSW Berry 0358CST A tornado that would eventually cross 3 county lines first touched down in southeastern Fayette County, about a mile southeast of the Newtonville Community. From there the tornado moved on a northeast path, for about 6.5 miles, before crossing briefly into Tuscaloosa County. In this segment of its path, damage was generally light until the tornado approached the Tuscaloosa County Line, when several mobile homes were hit and badly damaged. The tornado crossed into Tuscaloosa County just south of Fayette CR-68. Tuscaloosa County New Lexington 06 0258CST 5.46 1000 0 0 25.00K 0.00K Tornado (EF1) 4 N Sterling 0304CST The tornado that touched down in southeastern Fayette County entered Tuscaloosa County just west of the New Lexington Community. From there, the tornado continued its northeastward path, staying just inside Tuscaloosa County for about 5.5 miles. The tornado damaged a gas station building in New Lexington, and downed numerous trees. The tornado then moved back into Fayette County near Upper Ridge Road. Lamar County Crews 06 0300CST 0 0 0.00K 0.00K Hail (0.75) Fayette County 3 SSE Berry 06 0304CST 7.65 100 0 0 10.00K 0.00K Tornado (EF0) 2 NE Alta 0312CST The Newtonville tornado moved back into Fayette County, and continued its journey northeastward. In this segment, the tornado moved through a sparsely populated area between the city of Berry and the Boley Springs Community. No significant structures were hit, and only sporadic tree damage was observed. The tornado reached the Walker County line just west of Fayette CR-83. 5 Time Path Path Number of Estimated February 2008 Local/ Length Width Persons Damage Location Date Standard (Miles) (Yards) Killed Injured Property Crops Character of Storm ALABAMA, Central Walker County 2 WSW Carona 06 0312CST 6.52 2000 0 4 200.00K 0.00K Tornado (EF2) 1 NNW Oakman 0319CST The tornado that first touched down in Fayette County, and also moved through a small portion of Tuscaloosa County, moved into southeastern Walker County just southwest of the Corona Community. From there, the tornado traveled northeast for about 6.5 miles, and finally lifted northwest of the town of Oakman. The greatest amount of damage along the entire path of this tornado was experienced on Patton Hill Road, just west of Oakman. Several homes sustained significant damage near Corona, and several mobile homes were damaged or destroyed west of Oakman. There were also 4 minor injuries reported in Walker County. Along the entire path, at least 8 structures were destroyed, most of them mobile homes, and 15 other structures sustained varying degrees of damage. Walker County 1 NNE Jasper 06 0329CST 0 0 25.00K 0.00K Thunderstorm Wind (55EG) A billboard was blown down at AL-118 and Airport Road. Sumter County 1 ENE Cuba 06 0401CST 0 0 5.00K 0.00K Thunderstorm Wind (50EG) Several trees were blown down onto power lines along Pretty Branch Road, in Cuba. Sumter County 4 NE Panola 06 0420CST 0 0 3.00K 0.00K Thunderstorm Wind (50EG) Several trees were blown down along CR-85, about a mile south of the Pickens County line. Coosa County 5 SW Marble Vly 06 0625CST 13.64 2000 0 0 115.00K 0.00K Tornado (EF2) 4 WNW Stewartsville 0640CST The tornado touched down in the Hidden Valley community along Lay Lake, about 2 miles northeast of Lay Dam. It then tracked northeastward, before producing its most significant damage just east of Marble Valley along County Road 56. Four large wooden power poles were snapped off. Two mobile homes were knocked off their foundations and rolled over. Hundreds of hardwood and softwood trees were either snapped off or uprooted along the path. The tornado then continued northeastward, eventually crossing into Talladega County. Talladega County 3 S Gantts Quarry 06 0640CST 2.26 25 0 0 5.00K 0.00K Tornado (EF0) 2 SW Gantt Jct 0645CST The tornado that touched down in Coosa County moved northeastward, and crossed into Talladega County just east of CR-61.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • …Top 10 Weather Events of 2012…
    …Top 10 weather events of 2012… In terms of severe weather, 2012 started out fast and furious, and then petered out by late March. 1) By anyone’s measure, the tornado outbreak on the 2nd of March must qualify as our top event of 2012. The 49 mile long EF-4 tornado that tracked across southern Indiana became the first EF-4 in our forecast area since the northern Bullitt County tornado on May 28, 1996. Seven other tornadoes also developed on March 2, with 3 confirmed tornadoes in Trimble County alone. The image to the left shows two supercells following similar paths across southern Indiana. The first cell was producing an EF-4 tornado at this time. The second storm later brought softball sized hail and an EF-1 tornado just south of Henryville. Also, excessively large hail fell across both southern Indiana and south central Kentucky. Outside of several reports of softball-sized hail near Henryville, Indiana, associated with the second of two supercells that tracked over nearly the same path, our most damaging hailstorm developed across southwestern Adair County. This storm produced a hail swath more than 10 miles long, smashing the windshields of hundreds of vehicles before knocking out the skylights of a Walmart store in Columbia. The first picture, courtesy Simon Brewer of The Weather Channel, shows a large tornado in Washington County, IN. The image at left shows hail damage to a golf course near Henryville. 2) The Leap Day tornado outbreak on February 29 featured a squall line that spawned 6 tornadoes across central and south central Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • A Winter Forecasting Handbook Winter Storm Information That Is Useful to the Public
    A Winter Forecasting Handbook Winter storm information that is useful to the public: 1) The time of onset of dangerous winter weather conditions 2) The time that dangerous winter weather conditions will abate 3) The type of winter weather to be expected: a) Snow b) Sleet c) Freezing rain d) Transitions between these three 7) The intensity of the precipitation 8) The total amount of precipitation that will accumulate 9) The temperatures during the storm (particularly if they are dangerously low) 7) The winds and wind chill temperature (particularly if winds cause blizzard conditions where visibility is reduced). 8) The uncertainty in the forecast. Some problems facing meteorologists: Winter precipitation occurs on the mesoscale The type and intensity of winter precipitation varies over short distances. Forecast products are not well tailored to winter Subtle features, such as variations in the wet bulb temperature, orography, urban heat islands, warm layers aloft, dry layers, small variations in cyclone track, surface temperature, and others all can influence the severity and character of a winter storm event. FORECASTING WINTER WEATHER Important factors: 1. Forcing a) Frontal forcing (at surface and aloft) b) Jetstream forcing c) Location where forcing will occur 2. Quantitative precipitation forecasts from models 3. Thermal structure where forcing and precipitation are expected 4. Moisture distribution in region where forcing and precipitation are expected. 5. Consideration of microphysical processes Forecasting winter precipitation in 0-48 hour time range: You must have a good understanding of the current state of the Atmosphere BEFORE you try to forecast a future state! 1. Examine current data to identify positions of cyclones and anticyclones and the location and types of fronts.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Patrol Handbook
    FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION SERVICE PATROL HANDBOOK November 2008 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the department of transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document. i Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-HOP-08-031 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Service Patrol Handbook November 2008 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Nancy Houston, Craig Baldwin, Andrea Vann Easton, Steve Cyra, P.E., P.T.O.E., Marc Hustad, P.E., Katie Belmore, EIT 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Booz Allen Hamilton HNTB Corporation 8283 Greensboro Drive 11414 West Park Place, Suite 300 McLean, Virginia 22102 Milwaukee, WI 53224 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration, HOTO-1 Final Report U. S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D. C. 20590 HOTO, FHWA 15. Supplementary Notes Paul Sullivan, FHWA Office of Operations, Office of Transportation Operations, Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR). Handbook development was performed under contract to Booz Allen Hamilton. 16. Abstract This Handbook provides an overview of the Full-Function Service Patrol (FFSP) and describes desired program characteristics from the viewpoint of an agency that is responsible for funding, managing, and operating the services.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Analogues to Simulate Intensity, Trajectory, and Dynamical Changes in Alberta Clippers with Global Climate Change
    Using Analogues to Simulate Intensity, Trajectory, and Dynamical Changes in Alberta Clippers with Global Climate Change Item Type Thesis Authors Ward, Jamie L. Download date 07/10/2021 05:51:34 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10484/5573 Using Analogues to Simulate Intensity, Trajectory, and Dynamical Changes in Alberta Clippers with Global Climate Change _______________________ A thesis Presented to The College of Graduate and Professional Studies Department of Earth and Environmental Systems Indiana State University Terre Haute, Indiana ______________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts _______________________ by Jamie L. Ward August 2014 Jamie L. Ward, 2014 Keywords: Alberta Clippers, Storm Tracks, Lee Cyclogenesis, Global Climate Change, Atmospheric Analogues ii COMMITTEE MEMBERS Committee Chair: Gregory D. Bierly (Ph.D.) Professor of Geography Indiana State University Committee Member: Stephen Aldrich (Ph.D.) Assistant Professor of Geography Indiana State University Committee Member: Jennifer C. Latimer Associate Professor of Geology Indiana State University iii ABSTRACT Alberta Clippers are extratropical cyclones that form in the lee of the Canadian Rocky Mountains and traverse through the Great Plains and Midwest regions of the United States. With the imminent threat of global climate change and its effects on regional teleconnection patterns like El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), properties of Alberta Clipper could be altered as a result of changing atmospheric circulation patterns. Since the Great Plains and Midwest regions both support a large portion of the national population and agricultural activity, the effects of global climate change on Alberta Clippers could affect these areas in a variety of ways.
    [Show full text]
  • A Synoptic-Climatology and Composite Analysis of the Alberta Clipper
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
    [Show full text]
  • Key Performance Indicators in Public-Private Partnerships: a State-Of-The-Practice Report
    Key Performance Indicators in Public-Private Partnerships A State-of-the-Practice Report AUSTRALIA BRITISH COLUMBIA NEW ZEALAND UNITED KINGDOM UNITED STATES Sponsored by: In cooperation with: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials National Cooperative Highway Research Program March 2011 International Technology Scanning Program NOTICE The Federal Highway Administration provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that pro- motes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-PL-10-029 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Key Performance Indicators in March 2011 Public-Private Partnerships 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Michael Garvin, Keith Molenaar, Desiderio Navarro, Gordon Proctor 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) American Trade Initiatives 11. Contract or Grant No. P.O. Box 8228 Alexandria, VA 22306-8228 DTFH61-99-C-005 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Office of International Programs Federal Highway Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code U.S. Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials 15. Supplementary Notes FHWA COTR: Hana Maier, Office of International Programs 16. Abstract This report provides a state-of-the-practice description of domestic and international practices for key performance indicators (KPIs) in public-private partnerships (PPPs).
    [Show full text]
  • Synoptic Climatology of Lake-Effect Snow Events Off the Western Great Lakes
    climate Article Synoptic Climatology of Lake-Effect Snow Events off the Western Great Lakes Jake Wiley * and Andrew Mercer Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, 75 B. S. Hood Road, Starkville, MS 39762, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: As the mesoscale dynamics of lake-effect snow (LES) are becoming better understood, recent and ongoing research is beginning to focus on the large-scale environments conducive to LES. Synoptic-scale composites are constructed for Lake Michigan and Lake Superior LES events by employing an LES case repository for these regions within the U.S. North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) data for each LES event were used to construct synoptic maps of dominant LES patterns for each lake. These maps were formulated using a previously implemented composite technique that blends principal component analysis with a k-means cluster analysis. A sample case from each resulting cluster was also selected and simulated using the Advanced Weather Research and Forecast model to obtain an example mesoscale depiction of the LES environment. The study revealed four synoptic setups for Lake Michigan and three for Lake Superior whose primary differences were discrepancies in a surface pressure dipole structure previously linked with Great Lakes LES. These subtle synoptic-scale differences suggested that while overall LES impacts were driven more by the mesoscale conditions for these lakes, synoptic-scale conditions still provided important insight into the character of LES forcing mechanisms, primarily the steering flow and air–lake thermodynamics. Keywords: lake-effect; climatology; numerical weather prediction; synoptic; mesoscale; winter weather; Great Lakes; snow Citation: Wiley, J.; Mercer, A.
    [Show full text]
  • January 21, 2014 Winter Storm by Heather Sheffield, General
    January 21, 2014 Winter Storm By Heather Sheffield, General Forecaster The snow forecast quickly escalated 36 hours prior to the first snowflakes on Tuesday, January 21, 2014. Model Guidance over the weekend and prior to the event became snowier with each model run and consistency led to the issuance of a Winter Storm Warning on Monday, January 20, 2014. An upper trough was located across the eastern half of the United States. The storm track leading up to this event featured numerous waves of low pressure, called Alberta clippers, diving southeastward around the upper trough from central Canada into the mid-Atlantic region. Alberta clippers typically produce little precipitation since they originate from central Canada- a region without a large source of moisture. However, the one Alberta clipper that moved into the Northern Plains on the Monday afternoon of January 20 was able to tap into deeper moisture from the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean as low pressure rapidly developed in the Mid- Atlantic States on Tuesday. The strengthening of low pressure occurred in response to the position of several jet streaks in the upper levels of the troposphere- one over the northern Gulf Coast and another over New England (image below). An arctic cold front dropped southward into the region Tuesday morning, allowing cold air to sink southward into the region and precipitation with this event to be snow. Snow began to move over the Potomac Highlands early Tuesday morning. Reagan National Airport and Southern Maryland were in the upper 30s around sunrise Tuesday morning. Temperatures just before the snow arrived were above freezing across the greater Baltimore and DC metropolitan area due to light easterly surface flow and abundant cloud cover on Monday night, but quickly dropped once snow started to fall (note: temperatures at the NWS forecast office in Sterling, VA drop 5 degrees in 15 minutes at the onset).
    [Show full text]
  • Windstorms Intense Windstorms in the Northeastern United States F
    Windstorms Intense windstorms in the Northeastern United States F. Letson1, R. J. Barthelmie2, K.I. Hodges3 and S. C. Pryor1 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA 5 2Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA 3Environmental System Science Centre, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom Correspondence to: F. Letson ([email protected]), S.C. Pryor ([email protected]) Abstract. Windstorms are a major natural hazard in many countries. Windstorms Intense windstorms during the last four decades in the U.S. Northeast are identified and characterized using the spatial extent of locally extreme wind 10 speeds at 100 m height from the ERA5 reanalysis database. During all of the top 10 windstorms, wind speeds in excess of their local 99.9th percentile extend over at least one-third of land-based ERA5 grid cells in this high population density region of the U.S. Maximum sustained wind speeds at 100 m during these windstorms range from 26 to over 43 ms-1, with wind speed return periods exceeding 6.5 to 106 years (considering the top 5% of grid cells during each storm). The propertyProperty damage associated with these storms, (inflation adjusted to January 2020,) is ranges 15 from $24 million to over $29 billion. Two of these windstorms are linked to decaying tropical cyclones, three are Alberta Clippers and the remaining storms are Colorado Lows. Two of the ten re-intensified off the east coast leading to development of Nor’easters. These windstorms followed frequently observed cyclone tracks, but exhibit maximum intensities as measured using 700 hPa relative vorticity and mean sea level pressure that are five to ten times mean values for cyclones that followed similar tracks over this 40-year period.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Technical Memorandum NWSTM CR 38 .U61 No.38 U.S
    F QC 995 NOAA Technical Memorandum NWSTM CR 38 .U61 no.38 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Weather Service [ SNOW FORECASTING FOR SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN Rheinhart W. Harms CENTRAL REGION KANSAS CITY,MO NOV. 1970 DEC 7 1370 154 187 NO A4 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM* Central Region Subseries The Central Region Subseries provides a medium for quick dissemination of material not appropriate or not yet ready for formal publication. Material is primarily of regional interest and for regional people. References to this series should identify them as unpublished reports. 1 Precipitation Probability Forecast Verification Summary Nov. 1965 - Mar. 1966. 2 A Study of Summer Showers Over the Colorado Mountains. * 3 Areal Shower Distribution - Mountain Versus Valley Coverage. 4 Heavy Rains in Colorado June 16 and 17, 1965- 5 The Plum Fire. 6 Precipitation Probability Forecast Verification Summary Nov. 1965 - July 1966. 7 Effect of Diurnal Weather Variations on Soybean Harvest Efficiency. 8 Climatic Frequency of Precipitation at Central Region Stations. 9 Heavy Snow or Glazing. 10 Detection of a Weak Front by WSR-57 Radar. 11 Public Probability Forecasts. 12 Heavy Snow Forecasting in the Central United States(An Interim Report). 13 Diurnal Surface Geostrophic Wind Variations Over The Great Plains. 14 Forecasting Probability of Summertime Precipitation at Denver. 15 Improving Precipitation Probability Forecasts Using the Central Region Verification Printout. 16 Small-Scale Circulations Associated With Radiational Cooling. 17 Probability Verification Results (6-Month and 18-Month). 18 On The Use and Misuse Of The Brier Verification Score. 19 Probability Verification Results (24 Months). 20 Radar Depiction of the Topeka Tornado.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish & Wildlife Branch Research Permit Environmental Condition
    Fish & Wildlife Branch Research Permit Environmental Condition Standards Fish and Wildlife Branch Technical Report No. 2013-21 December 2013 Fish & Wildlife Branch Scientific Research Permit Environmental Condition Standards First Edition 2013 PUBLISHED BY: Fish and Wildlife Branch Ministry of Environment 3211 Albert Street Regina, Saskatchewan S4S 5W6 SUGGESTED CITATION FOR THIS MANUAL: Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment. 2013. Fish & Wildlife Branch scientific research permit environmental condition standards. Fish and Wildlife Branch Technical Report No. 2013-21. 3211 Albert Street, Regina, Saskatchewan. 60 pp. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Fish & Wildlife Branch scientific research permit environmental condition standards: The Research Permit Process Renewal working group (Karyn Scalise, Sue McAdam, Ben Sawa, Jeff Keith and Ed Beveridge) compiled the information found in this document to provide necessary information regarding species protocol environmental condition parameters. COVER PHOTO CREDITS: http://www.freepik.com/free-vector/weather-icons-vector- graphic_596650.htm CONTENT PHOTO CREDITS: as referenced CONTACT: [email protected] COPYRIGHT Brand and product names mentioned in this document are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders. Use of brand names does not constitute an endorsement. Except as noted, all illustrations are copyright 2013, Ministry of Environment. ii Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Value for Money Analysis I-595 Corridor Roadway Improvements
    I-595 Corridor Roadway Improvements Value for Money Analysis Table of Contents Table of Contents 0. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 2 1. Project Background ................................................................................................................. 4 1.1. Project History .................................................................................................................. 4 1.2. Location ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.3. Scope ................................................................................................................................ 6 2. Selection of Funding and Contracting Method ....................................................................... 7 2.1. FDOT’s goals ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.2. Funding and Contracting Methods .................................................................................. 7 2.3. Basis for Initial Value for Money Analysis in 2007 ........................................................... 9 3. Procurement Process ............................................................................................................ 13 3.1. Procurement Structure .................................................................................................. 13 3.2.
    [Show full text]