DOCSLIB.ORG

February 2005 Newsletter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
February 2005 Newsletter The AATSEEL AmericanN EWSLETTERAssociation of Teachers of Slavic & East European Languages Contents Message from the President ...............3 Letter from the Editor ...........................3 AATSEEL Awards .................................4 Special in This Issue: Russian at Work ....................................5 Recent Publications ..............................6 Technology and Language 2004 AATSEEL Awards Learning ...............................................7 Awards ....................................................7 Call for Papers for Member News .......................................8 Everything You Always Wanted to 2005 Annual Know about Grammar But Were Afraid to Ask ......................................9 Conference Summer Language Programs ............................................12 Psychology of Language Learning .............................................15 Graduate Student Forum ...................16 Czech Corner .......................................18 Ukrainian Issues .................................20 Call for Papers .....................................23 Belarusica .............................................27 Employment Opportunities ..............28 Professional Opportunities ...............29 Volume 48 Issue 1 February 2005 AATSEEL NEWSLETTER Vol. 48, Issue 1 February 2005 AATSEEL NEWSLETTER EDITORIAL STAFF AATSEEL POINTS OF CONTACT Editor: BETTY LOU LEAVER President: Assistant Editor: ANNA JACOBSON CATHARINE THEIMER NEPOMNYASHCHY Contributing Editors: VALERY BELYANIN Barnard College [email protected] ALINA ISRAELI OLGA LIVSHIN President-Elect: KEITH MEYER-BLASING SIBELAN FORRESTER ALLA NEDASHKIVSKA Swarthmore College JEANETTE OWEN [email protected] MILA SASKOVA-PIERCE Past President: LINDA SCATTON BENJAMIN RIFKIN CURT WOOLHISER University of Wisconsin [email protected] NL Coordinates: Vice Presidents: Editor: [email protected] EMILY JOHNSON Assistant Editor: [email protected] University of Oklahoma Layout/Advertising: [email protected] [email protected] TODD GOLDING AATSEEL Office: Jefferson High School KATHLEEN DILLON [email protected] Executive Director, AATSEEL STEVE FRANKS P. O. Box 7039 Indiana University Berkeley, CA 94707-2306 USA [email protected] Phone/fax: 510-526-6614 MARY NICHOLAS E-mail: [email protected] Layout/Advertising: CDL Services, Amman, Jordan Lehigh University [email protected] Submitting Copy: JANE HACKING (1) Foreign languages are accommodated if prepared on Ma- University of Utah cIntosh with a truetype or postscript font that can be shared. [email protected] (2) Eps or pdf with embedded fonts, Indesign, PageMaker, TODD ARMSTRONG and Quark Express documents can be accommodated. Grinnell College (3) Please do not double-space between sentences in elec- [email protected] tronic submissions. Program Coordinator: (4) Please query the editor about formatting, content, graph- WILLIAM COMER ics, or language. University of Kansas (5) Since the newsletter is produced in part in Jordan, submis- [email protected] sions must be sent by fax or email by deadlines given on the Editor, Slavic and East European Journal: back cover and on the AATSEEL website. GERALD JANECEK (6) The AATSEEL Newsletter is not copyrighted. Authors University of Kentucky wishing to protect their contributions should copyright their [email protected] materials. Editor, AATSEEL Newsletter: (7) Full specifications are available at the AATSEEL web site. BETTY LOU LEAVER New York Institute of Technology, Jordan [email protected] AATSEEL Web site Executive Director: KATHLEEN DILLON For current online information about [email protected] AATSEEL and its activities, visit AATSEEL Webmaster: on the web: MARTA DEYRUP Seton Hall Univ. http://www.aatseel.org [email protected] 2 February 2005 Vol. 48, Issue 1 AATSEEL NEWSLETTER Message from the to be busier in the twenty-first century, this and it seems a long way to next De- in part because email and the internet cember, I want to urge you all to mark AATSEEL President have placed greater resources at our December 27-30 on your calendars. We disposal, and in part because ever more are fortunate that the convention this As I take on the position of Presi- energy seems to go to administrative year will be in Washington, DC, cer- dent of AATSEEL, I cannot look to the holding actions to maintain the place tainly the best place to get our message future without first paying my respects of our field in the academy. Our field out. I call on the whole membership to to the past. AATSEEL has indeed been is more diffuse than it once was, and make this the best AATSEEL conven- fortunate over the years to find dedicated many of us work across disciplinary tion ever—by putting together panels, people willing to devote their time and and national boundaries, which makes suggesting special events, encouraging energy to the good of the organization AAASS, MLA, ACTFL and a host of your students, colleagues, and peers to and the field it represents. My immedi- other conferences and organizations participate, and, most important, com- ate predecessors—Sally Pratt, who now attractive competitors for our time and ing to Washington yourself. retires as Past President, and Ben Rifkin, attention. who moves into that position—have In order to survive, like any healthy shepherded the organization through organization, AATSEEL must adapt some of its hardest times. to its changing context—without, Looking back further in time, my however, jettisoning its heritage. My Letter own biggest debt of gratitude, and part greatest priority in my term as president from the Editor of what has kept me a loyal supporter will be to do what I can to reinvigorate of AATSEEL over the years, is to Joe scholarly and professional dialogue not Greetings to all and best wishes for Malik, Executive Secretary-Treasurer only among generations, but among another new year! (that was the title then) of the organiza- the various constituencies of the or- The first thing you may have no- tion from 1968 to 1985. My first contact ganization—language and literature ticed is the different way in which you with AATSEEL came when I was still a pedagogues, linguists, secondary and received this newsletter. Yep, we have graduate student doing registration for post-secondary teachers. While our gone entirely electronic. We had experi- the annual convention when it was held individual specializations all too often mented with e-distribution successfully in New York. In those days, a quarter of put up barriers between us, in the final earlier (see the article on page 5), but a century ago, it was relatively rare for analysis, we are all in the same belea- we had not planned a leap into full graduate students to give papers at the guered boat of Slavic studies, struggling e-distibution for some time. However, conference, but Dr. Malik was always to stay afloat in an environment that the times being what they are and the encouraging to the junior people in the appears ever more indifferent or hostile problems of using paper copy (efforts, field—even to the extent of bending the to the humanities in general and our time, cost, speed) being what they are, rules to let a grad student give as many own region of the world in particular. the Executive Committee decided at as three papers at one conference! (For- AATSEEL remains our professional or- the December meeting at the Annual tunately, I don’t think any of us were ganization and our best advocate, but it Convention of the AATSEEL to move actually crazy enough to go through will only be as strong as the community into full e-distribution effective this fall. with it.) Dr. Malik welcomed panels of which it is composed. However, with the loss of our account put together by graduate students, es- The work of AATSEEL goes on all person at the printing house, with the pecially those with participants from year long, and we are indeed fortunate resulting December newletter not reach- different institutions and from different to have a worthy successor to Joe Malik ing some members of AATSEEL until generations. Most important, AATSEEL in Kathleen Dillon, who, as Executive the end of Jaznuary, something had to was my window into the larger field, Director, keeps the organization go- be done. For now, we will be using a giving me and others of my generation ing day to day. And, of course, SEEJ, hidden URL for all members for whom in the pre-internet world the chance to the Newsletter, and the webpage are we have e-mail addresses on file and find out what was going on beyond our important services of the organization. paper printouts to others. We are looking home institutions, in the wider world However, for the majority of our mem- at other forms of distribution and may of Slavic. The convention was one of bers, the national convention remains do a passworded online version begin- the high points of the year. Even if it the “big event” of AATSEEL, a time to ning in the fall. One advantage of the did come inconveniently, then as now, share the fruits of research and teaching, e-version should be readily evident: we between Christmas and New Year’s, it to reconnect with old friends, and make have added color! Another advantage was an event not to be missed. new ones—to give up a few days of the is that you can now do a computer-as- As we look to the future of AAT- holiday season in the good cause of de- sisted search for topics of interest. Stay SEEL, it is clear that things have fining the current state of our field. tuned! More bells and whistles may be changed dramatically since the early So, even though a January blizzard coming! days of the organization. We all seem is raging outside my window as I write 3 AATSEEL NEWSLETTER Vol. 48, Issue 1 February 2005 2004 AATSEEL Awards Presentation Call for Nominations for At the December AATSEEL Annual Meeting, President Benjamin Rifkin the 2005 AATSEEL and Past President Sally Pratt presented Awards: 2004 awards to AATSEEL members selected for their contribution to the • Excellence in Teaching at the field. A full description of the awards Secondary Level was published in the October 2004 • Excellence in Teaching at the AATSEEL Newsletter. Below are photos Post-Secondary Level from the awards ceremony.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ewa M. Pasek - CV Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures University of Michigan 3222 MLB, 812 E
    Ewa M. Pasek - CV Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures University of Michigan 3222 MLB, 812 E. Washington Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Email: [email protected] Education M.A. Faculty of Philosophy and Sociology, University of Warsaw, 1990 M.A. Thesis: “The Theory of Predestination in Works of St. Augustine, B. Pascal, & S. Kierkegaard” M.A. Faculty of Polish Philology University of Warsaw, 1987 M.A. Thesis: “Poetics of St. Augustine” Teaching Lecturer II, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Department of Slavic Languages & Literatures Czech Language and Culture: Czech 141/142 (2007-2017), Czech 241/242 (2009-2014) Polish Language and Culture - Polish 121/122 (2001-2013, 2016-2017), Polish 221 (2013-2015), Polish 321/322 (1997 – 2016) Polish Literature in English to 1890, Polish 325 (Co-instructor, Fall 2006) Roma Minority in the Czech Republic: Slavic 290 (2011) Roma Minority in Central and Eastern Europe: Slavic 150 (2014-2017) Teacher, American High School of Warsaw, Poland Polish language, literature and culture for native speakers (1995 – 1996) Teacher, XXI H. Kołłataj High School, Warsaw, Poland Ethics, Polish language, literature and culture, and social studies (1991 -1995) Other ACTFL-Certified OPI Tester for Polish since 2014 Library Assistant, University of Michigan, Library Acquisition, July-December 2003 Research Assistant, Polish Academy of Sciences, Polish Language Institute, Department of the History of Polish Language, 1992 - 2001 Member of the team working on development of the Dictionary of the 17th Century Polish Language Reviewer (free-lance) Assessing and reviewing textbooks for Polish Scientific Publishers (PWN) and educational programs for Polish Television, 1991 -1995 Publications Małachowska-Pasek, E., (2014), Nauczanie języka obcego na odległość w modelu synchronicznym na przykładzie języka czeskiego.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Czech Language
    E-Leader Berlin 2012 Celebrating EUROMOSAIC vs. language policies: the case of the Czech language Božena Bedna říková Dept. of Czech Studies Faculty of Arts Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic and Universita degli Studi di Udine Dipartimento delle Lingue e Letterature Straniere Udine/I, Italy 1. The EU language policy and the European Commission Project EUROMOSAIC The EU has a positive policy towards regional and minority languages which is enshrined in Article 22 of the European Charter of Fundamental Rights. It states that “The Union respects cultural, religious and linguistic diversity ”. The European Commision has been providing several projects supporting regional and minority languages, one of them being the NETWORK PROMOTING THE LANGUAGE DIVERSITY. It is a pan-European Network which covers regional, minority, indigenous, cross-border and smaller national languages with the task to promote linguistic diversity in Europe. The main focus is providing information about and easy access to a large network of organisations that can share ideas, information and best practice regarding the promotion of less widely used languages. In 1992, wishing to take stock of the situation of the various language communities in Europe, the Commission initiated a study on minority language groups in the European Union. The purpose of the study, entitled "EUROMOSAIC" (later EROMOSAIC I), was not only to support the regional and minority languages, but also to find out about the different regional and minority languages in existence and to establish their potential for expanding, i. e. for their production and reproduction, and to examine the difficulties, the barriers and the challenges they could encounter in doing so.
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Language Programs and Czech As a Heritage Language in the United States
    Czech Language Programs and Czech as a Heritage Language in the United States Simone J. Hrouda, Portland State University, Oregon Introduction Czech language schools and Czech classes exist across the United States because of the efforts of Czech heritage language speakers to preserve the language spoken by their ancestors. These programs provide heritage speakers with the opportunity to further develop and maintain their Czech oral and written skills. Even though the language and culture are vital to the identity of individuals in states such as Nebraska, Texas, and Wisconsin, the importance of sustaining the language is not recognized on a national level. Czech is not considered a critical foreign language, and limited opportunities are available for language courses and scholarship programs. It is up to Czech heritage societies to keep Czech classes alive. Czech is a less commonly taught language (LCTL) in the United States, and locating Czech classes is difficult. However, these challenges and many others do not hinder Czech speakers from learning the Czech language. Though small, there is a Czech-speaking population made up of heritage, non-heritage, and native speakers who are making efforts to keep the Czech language alive. History of the Czech Language in the United States The largest immigration of Czechs to the United States took place between the years 1848 and 1914, when over 350,000 Czechs fled their homeland and established Czech communities across the United States (Thernstorm, 1981). Over time, language attrition and acculturation have led to loss of the Czech language within these communities (Dutkova-Cope, 2006; Eckert, 1987; Hannan, 2003; Vasek, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the Illyrian Movement on the Croatian Lexicon
    Slavistische Beiträge ∙ Band 223 (eBook - Digi20-Retro) George Thomas The Impact of the Illyrian Movement on the Croatian Lexicon Verlag Otto Sagner München ∙ Berlin ∙ Washington D.C. Digitalisiert im Rahmen der Kooperation mit dem DFG-Projekt „Digi20“ der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek, München. OCR-Bearbeitung und Erstellung des eBooks durch den Verlag Otto Sagner: http://verlag.kubon-sagner.de © bei Verlag Otto Sagner. Eine Verwertung oder Weitergabe der Texte und Abbildungen, insbesondere durch Vervielfältigung, ist ohne vorherige schriftliche Genehmigung des Verlages unzulässig. «Verlag Otto Sagner» ist ein Imprint der Kubon & Sagner GmbH. George Thomas - 9783954792177 Downloaded from PubFactory at 01/10/2019 04:08:27AM via free access 00050383 S lavistische B e it r ä g e BEGRÜNDET VON ALOIS SCHMAUS HERAUSGEGEBEN VON HEINRICH KUNSTMANN PETER REHDER • JOSEF SCHRENK REDAKTION PETER REHDER Band 223 VERLAG OTTO SAGNER MÜNCHEN George Thomas - 9783954792177 Downloaded from PubFactory at 01/10/2019 04:08:27AM via free access 00050383 GEORGE THOMAS THE IMPACT OF THEJLLYRIAN MOVEMENT ON THE CROATIAN LEXICON VERLAG OTTO SAGNER • MÜNCHEN 1988 George Thomas - 9783954792177 Downloaded from PubFactory at 01/10/2019 04:08:27AM via free access ( B*y«ftecne I Staatsbibliothek l Mönchen ISBN 3-87690-392-0 © Verlag Otto Sagner, München 1988 Abteilung der Firma Kubon & Sagner, GeorgeMünchen Thomas - 9783954792177 Downloaded from PubFactory at 01/10/2019 04:08:27AM via free access 00050383 FOR MARGARET George Thomas - 9783954792177 Downloaded from PubFactory at 01/10/2019 04:08:27AM via free access .11 ж ־ י* rs*!! № ri. ur George Thomas - 9783954792177 Downloaded from PubFactory at 01/10/2019 04:08:27AM via free access 00050383 Preface My original intention was to write a book on caiques in Serbo-Croatian.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigrant Languages and Education: Wisconsin's German Schools
    chapter 3 Immigrant Languages and Education Wisconsin’s German Schools antje petty n the second half of the nineteenth century, the Wisconsin land- scape was dotted with public, private, and parochial schools where I children and grandchildren of immigrants were taught in German, Norwegian, Polish, or other older immigrant languages that are de - scribed in chapter 2. Today, the language of instruction in Wisconsin schools is almost exclusively English, but the state still has large immi- grant communities with families who speak Hmong or Spanish (chap- ters 8 and 9), and the question of how to teach immigrant children is as current as it was 100 or 150 years ago. While the languages have changed, basic issues remain: Should Wisconsin children be taught in English only, in their native tongue, or in a bilingual setting? How im - portant is the language of instruction for “quality education” and content learning? What role does the school language play in the integration, acculturation, and “Americanization” process? And how important is the language spoken in the classroom for the maintenance of ethnic identity and cultural heritage? This chapter explores the example of schooling among German-speaking immigrants and their descendants in Wisconsin, the largest non-English-speaking population in the state’s early history.1 Education patterns in some other language communities such as Norwegian or Polish were generally similar, although the popu - lations were smaller populations.2 Still smaller groups, though, such as West Frisians, who numbered only a few hundred, lacked institutional 37 38 antje petty support and infrastructure like church services or a press and did not have schools teaching their language.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Co? Was? German-Polish Linguistic Attitudes in Frankfurt (Oder)
    Co? Was ? German-Polish Linguistic Attitudes in Frankfurt (Oder) Megan Clark Senior Linguistics Thesis Bryn Mawr College 2010 In this study I analyze the linguistic attitudes held by Polish and German speakers in the border towns of Frankfurt an der Oder, Germany and Słubice, Poland, held together by a cross-border university. I consider the historical background in the relationship between the two communities, including but not limited to the effect of Germany and Poland’s separate entrances into the European Union and Schengen zone, which have divided the two countries until recently, as well as the adoption of the Euro in both Germany and, later, Poland. With consideration of this history, I explore the concept of linguistic attitudes in other border communities to mark parallels and differences in the attitudes of speakers on each side of the border, most notably different because of the presence of the university on both sides of the dividing river. I supplement this research with a study conducted on speakers themselves within each side of the community to explore the underlying thoughts and ideas behind attitudes toward speakers of the other language, investigating why so many Polish speakers are fluent in German, while only a few German students endeavor to learn Polish. The research we have conducted here explores a very important aspect of language attitudes as a proxy for European geo-political relations as exemplified in the role of Poland as an outlier in the European Union due to its late joining and reluctant acceptance of the Euro. Though student relations on the border are strong, the heart of Słubice remains untouched by German residents, despite full osmosis of Polish citizens into the heart of Frankfurt.
    [Show full text]
  • Eight Fragments Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian
    EIGHT FRAGMENTS FROM THE WORLD OF MONTENEGRIN LANGUAGES AND SERBIAN, CROATIAN, SERBIAN, CROATIAN, BOSNIAN SERBIAN, CROATIAN, BOSNIAN AND FROM THE WORLD OF MONTENEGRIN EIGHT FRAGMENTS LANGUAGES Pavel Krejčí PAVEL KREJČÍ PAVEL Masaryk University Brno 2018 EIGHT FRAGMENTS FROM THE WORLD OF SERBIAN, CROATIAN, BOSNIAN AND MONTENEGRIN LANGUAGES Selected South Slavonic Studies 1 Pavel Krejčí Masaryk University Brno 2018 All rights reserved. No part of this e-book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission of copyright administrator which can be contacted at Masaryk University Press, Žerotínovo náměstí 9, 601 77 Brno. Scientific reviewers: Ass. Prof. Boryan Yanev, Ph.D. (Plovdiv University “Paisii Hilendarski”) Roman Madecki, Ph.D. (Masaryk University, Brno) This book was written at Masaryk University as part of the project “Slavistika mezi generacemi: doktorská dílna” number MUNI/A/0956/2017 with the support of the Specific University Research Grant, as provided by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic in the year 2018. © 2018 Masarykova univerzita ISBN 978-80-210-8992-1 ISBN 978-80-210-8991-4 (paperback) CONTENT ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................. 5 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 7 CHAPTER 1 SOUTH SLAVONIC LANGUAGES (GENERAL OVERVIEW) ............................... 9 CHAPTER 2 SELECTED CZECH HANDBOOKS OF SERBO-CROATIAN
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Official and Minority Languages in Poland
    Walery Pisarek The relationship between official and minority languages in Poland Streszczenie: Relacje między językiem urzędowym a językami mniejszościowymi w Polsce Dla co najmniej 96% mieszkających w Polsce 38 230 tysięcy obywateli Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej język polski jest językiem ojczystym. Znakomitej większości pozostałych 4% polskich obywateli język polski jest dobrze znany (niekiedy lepiej niż deklarowany język ojczysty) przynajmniej biernie. Polska należy więc obecnie do krajów o niskim odsetku mniejszości narodowych. Najważniejszym dokumentem regulującym status mniejszości językowych w Polsce jest ustawa z 6 stycznia 2005 r. Za języki mniejszości narodowych uznane są: białoruski, czeski, hebrajski, jidysz, litewski, niemiecki, ormiański, rosyjski, słowacki i ukraiński, za języki mniejszości etnicznych – karaimski, łemkowski, romski i tatarski, a za język regionalny – kaszubski. Najliczniejszą mniejszość językową w Polsce stanowią osoby wskazujące niemiecki jako swój język ojczysty. Polska ratyfikowała zarówno Europejską kartę języków regionalnych i mniejszościowych (w 2008), jak i Konwencję ramową o ochronie mniejszości narodowych (w 2000). Występują znaczne różnice między danymi pochodzącymi od rzeczników mniejszości a wynikami Narodowego Spisu Powszechnego z r. 2002 co do liczebności poszczególnych mniejszości. Powinien je zweryfikować następny Spis przewidziany na r. 2011. Sytuacje konfliktowe między językiem polskim jako urzędowym językiem RP a językami mniejszościowymi występują najczęściej w zakresie napisów do publicznego użytku. Zazwyczaj chodzi o relacje między wersją polską a wersją obcojęzyczną. Niektóre z polskich dialektów pretendują do statusu języka regionalnego. Ta tendencja obecnie przejawia się najsilniej wśród mieszkańców Górnego Śląska. 38 230 000 citizens of the Republic of Poland live in Poland. For at least 96% of them, i.e. for 36 700 000, the Polish language is their native language.
    [Show full text]
  • The Czech Language
    Diversity, communication and coexistence On a small mother tongue as a barrier to intercultural policies: the czech language Jakub Zouhar University of Hradec Králové, Czech Republic Abstract The essay will discuss the influence of a small language on intercultural policies in the Czech Republic. The Czech language as the only official language in the Czech Republic can definitely be ranked among small European languages since it numbers only over 11 million native speakers. There is no doubt that the fact must affect the way of thinking of the majority of Czech society. From any intercultural policy’s point of view, the impact on the society might be considered as adverse. It will be argued that the Czech society might face an uphill struggle to become international more significantly than other societies that are historically connected with different cultures across the world. The language, needless to say, plays a key role here. Despite the fact, the Czech society has after all an advantage of all similarly small language groups, i.e. nearly everyone is motivated to become multilingual. You live a new life for every new language you speak (Czech proverb) I It has already been said many times that globalisation is a complex and controversial concept. There is little agreement in the literature on what it is, whether it is or is not taking place, whether it is new or old, and if it is good or bad. The process of intensification of interconnectedness, however, does not come about without certain underlying socioeconomic conditions and policy mechanisms. Globalisation, thus, needs to be understood not merely in terms of greater interconnectedness or of creating a single global economic space but also in terms of the underlying context that has made it possible, as well as the institutional arrangements and policy instruments that serve as mechanisms for promoting it.
    [Show full text]
  • 89 Speech Accommodation by Moravians in Prague Jan Chromý
    SALI 2011/2 /9.1.2012 – SALI_2011_02_04.indd Recenze Speech accommodation by Moravians in Prague Jan Chromý Institute of Czech Language and Theory of Communication, Faculty of Arts, Charles Uni- versity in Prague [email protected] WILSON, James (2010): Moravians in Prague. A Sociolinguistic Study of Dialect Contact in the Czech Republic. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 267 p. ISBN 978-3-631-58694-5. Although sociolinguistics is a discipline of great interest to many linguistically oriented re- searchers in the world, there are still only few sociolinguists who are concerned with Czech. This could be ascribed to the development of Czech linguistics in the 20th century and its primary orientation on theoretical issues defined by the Prague Linguistic Circle in the 1920s and 1930s. A good illustration of this might be an article sub-title “Why is there no Czech sociolinguistics” (Starý, 1993) or several years older a statement “in principle there is no sociolinguistics in Czechoslovakia” (Nekvapil, 1986, p. 7). Nevertheless, in the 1990s and in the beginning of the 21st century, a group of younger linguists (e.g. Vít Dovalil, Tamah Sher- man and Marián Sloboda, or Martin Havlík), under the leadership of Jiří Nekvapil, emerged who changed this unfortunate situation. Their concerns are primarily based in interactional sociolinguistics and in language management – however, the present book by James Wilson is an exception since it is variationist in principle. To my knowledge, it is the first empirical study oriented on the Czech language situation which uses modern methods of variationist sociolinguistics. How do Moravians speak when they come to Prague? In his book, Wilson is concerned with the general issue if and how do Moravians (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of the Polish Language in America. Inter-And Intralinguistic
    Franciszek Lyra Some aspects of the Polish language in Americal : inter- and intralinguistic processes in the Polish of Americans of descent on the phonological level... Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio F, Nauki Filozoficzne i Humanistyczne 17, 59-86 1962 ANNALES UNI VERSITATIS MARIAE CURIE-SKŁ OD O W S K A LUBLIN —POLONIA VOL. XVII, 5 SECTIO F 1962 £ Katedry Języka Polskiego Wydziału Humanistycznego UMCS Kierownik: doc. dr Leon Kaczmarek Franciszek LYRA Some Aspects of the Polish Language in America. Inter- and Intralinguistic Processes in the Polish of Americans of Descent on the Phonological Level Niektóre aspekty języka polskiego w Stanach Zjednoczonych. Procesy inter- i intralingwinistyczne w języku polskim Amerykanów polskiego pochodzenia w dziedzinie fonologii Некоторые аспекты польского языка в Соединенных Штатах. Интер- и интралингвистические процессы в польском языке Американцев польского происхождения в области фонологии INTRODUCTION Objections may be raised as to the legitimacy of the term ’’Polish” in reference to the type of Polish used by Americans of Polish descent, particularly by those of the second and older generations. If, for instance, informant I 1 were brought in contact with a monolingual native Pole, verbal communication would be obstructed, despite the fact that the informant actually claims to speak Polish. The kind of Polish spoken by the average American of Polish descent in his ethnic milieu could not be used in Poland without causing impediment of communication or ridicule. But the interruption of communication would affect only one direction, that from the Polish American to the native monolingual Pole. The former would understand the latter without much difficulty.
    [Show full text]
  • Language: Talking Or Trading Blows in the Upper Silesian Industrial Basin?1
    AUTHOR’S COPY | AUTORENEXEMPLAR Language: Talking or trading blows in the Upper Silesian industrial basin?1 TOMASZ KAMUSELLA Abstract In the 19 th century, in the eastern half of Prussia’s region of Upper Si- lesia, continental Europe’s second largest industrial basin emerged. In the course of the accelerated urbanization that followed, an increasing number of German- and Germanic-speakers arrived in this overwhelm- ingly Slavophone area that historically skirted the Germanic dialect con- tinuum to the west. The resultant dynamic interaction between Slavic- and German/ic-speakers led to the emergence of an Upper Silesian Slavic-Germanic pidgin that, in the late 19 th century, became creolized. The 1922 partition of this region between Germany and Poland led to respective Germanization and Polonization of a population that was typically multiglossic in the creole, in the local Slavic dialect, in standard German, and in standard Polish. Successive dramatic reversals in these policies of Germanization and Polonization between 1939 and 1989 en- sured the survival of a Polonized version of the creole, which the local population perceives either as a dialect of German, or a dialect of Polish, or their own (national) Silesian language. Keywords: dialect continuum, ethnolinguistic nationalism, Germany, Poland, Upper Silesia, Upper Silesian Creole, Silesian lan- guage, [Upper] Silesians 1. Introduction Upper Silesia used to be a peripheral territory lost among forests and swamps. It entered the annals of political history after Prussia had wrenched most of the Duchy of Silesia from the Habsburgs in 1740Ϫ 42, during the First Silesian War. The main territorial prize at the time was Lower Silesia, with its large urban center at Breslau (Wrocław).
    [Show full text]