Terrifica Stakeholder Mapping Report
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Stakeholder Mapping Report 1 What is TeRRIFICA? Find out on our project website: www.terrifica.eu ! What else has been published in TeRRIFICA? Report on Institutional Framework: Overview of the current state regarding climate mitigation and adaptation in the six pilot regions Case Studies report: Analysis of case studies on effective practices in community-academia partnerships and their success factors. Guide on co-creation and stakeholder engagement Supportive document on how to foster stakeholders’ engagement and co-creation processes. Free download is available on our project website! How to get in touch with us? For general questions or requests, please contact our project coordinator: Norbert Steinhaus, Science Shop Bonn [email protected] For questions or requests regarding one specific pilot region, please contact the pilot region teams: https://terrifica.eu/member/ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction – who to engage with? .................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Why a stakeholder mapping report? ............................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 3 1. Maps – Who are key climate stakeholders in the pilot regions? ........................................................................ 5 2. Summary analysis – What are key stakeholders barriers, drivers and needs for engagement? ...................... 33 2.1 Barriers for engagement ............................................................................................................................. 33 2.2 Drivers for engagement .............................................................................................................................. 33 2.3 Needs for engagement: ............................................................................................................................... 36 2.4 Conclusions – after the knowledge phase, further co-creation facilitation ................................................ 37 3. Bibliography ...................................................................................................................................................... 38 4. Appendix 1 – Barriers, drivers and needs for engagement in pilot regions: ..................................................... 47 4.1 Belgrade pilot region ................................................................................................................................... 47 4.2 Brittany, Pays de la Loire, Normandy pilot region ....................................................................................... 48 4.3 Metropolitan Area of Barcelona pilot region .............................................................................................. 49 4.4 Minsk Pilot region ....................................................................................................................................... 51 4.5 PoZnań pilot region ..................................................................................................................................... 52 4.6 South Oldenburg: Vechta and Cloppenburg Pilot region ............................................................................ 56 5. Appendix 2 – Guidelines for the Stakeholder Mapping Report and Consultation workshop ........................... 57 5.1 Stakeholder mapping methodology guidelines ........................................................................................... 57 5.2 Consultation Workshop – Guidelines .......................................................................................................... 60 3 1. Introduction – who to engage with? decision-making1, or the stakeholder-issue 1.1 Why a stakeholder mapping mapping as “a method for understanding a report? ‘system’ by identifying the key stakeholders in TeRRIFICA – standing for Territorial the system, and assessing their interests in Responsible Research and Innovation that system2.” In this report, stakeholder Fostering Innovative Climate Action – is a mapping is understood as a process European project aiming at developing identifying key stakeholders to engage with, innovative climate action through stakeholder across the full stakeholder spectrum, and engagement and co-creation. determining the basis for engagement strategies, in the particular sector of climate Climate change is a raising issue in the agenda, action. In other words, the stakeholder at the global, national and local scales. On the mapping process is a starting point to engage one hand, many actors are (getting) interested in taking actions to tackle climate change, and on the other hand, mitigating climate change “Stakeholder mapping is requires actions from all stakeholders – understood as a process especially policy-makers and industries – whilst climate effects is or will affect all of us. identifying key stakeholders TeRRIFICA pilot regions’ co-creation teams to engage with, across the full have the mission to gather stakeholders in stakeholder spectrum, and order to co-create innovative climate actions. This mission raises the following questions: determining the basis for Who to invite to participate in? Who are the engagement strategies, in the key actors that have the power to influence climate actions locally? Who are the important particular sector of climate stakeholders who might be or not in favour of action.” achieving innovative and impactful co-created climate actions? What are the barriers, needs with stakeholders and its core objective is to and drivers for engaging these stakeholders? identify who are the key stakeholders to engage within TeRRIFICA, and moreover to The process of mapping stakeholders has the foster their engagement. goal of answering these questions and helping pilot regions’ co-creation teams to identify the key actors in their region, their relationships, and their drivers and obstacles in order to better involve stakeholders and foster local 1 co-creation. Mayers J., Vermeulen S., Stakeholder influence mapping tool, International Institute for Environment 1.2 Methodology and Development, March 2005, http://policy- powertools.org/Tools/Understanding/docs/stakeholder_ There is a diversity of stakeholder mapping influence_mapping_tool_english.pdf analysis types and methodologies, such as the 2 Vanderlinden, J-P., Stojanovic, T., Schmuëli, D., Bremer, stakeholder-influence mapping that focuses S., Kostrzewa, C. and McFadden, L. (with others) (2011) on the influence of stakeholders over the The SPICOSA Stakeholder-Policy Mapping Users’ Manual, Spicosa Project Report, Guyancourt: Paris, Université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines. 4 The methodology to map the stakeholders has responsible for the built environment, included the following steps: the natural environment, and those involved with indigenous issues. 1. Identifying: listing relevant groups and organisations through desk research; We may add to this list other stakeholders 2. Analysing: understanding their relevant for climate adaptation and interests and views through mitigation, such as: consultation workshop and other interviews (see appendix 2); § Climate movements including 3. Mapping: visualiZing the relationships engaged citiZens, not necessarily between stakeholders in order to formally organised into a NGO identify the key stakeholders; structure; 4. Prioritizing: ranking stakeholder § Industries being the major sources of relevance, through the mapping, in greenhouses gas (GHG) emissions order to analyse the drivers, barriers, (fossil fuel companies etc.); and needs for stakeholder § Etc. engagement (see appendix 1). There are several methodology limitations There is a huge number of actors relevant for that are worth to be mentioned for this climate action, even at the local level. Thus, report, including: pilot regions may have focused their research on stakeholders relevant for their thematic § The stakeholder mapping process is focus – air pollution, water, temperature, or not exhaustive, as pilot regions may agriculture. have focused on specific climate change topics but also specific The Climate Adaptation Flagship identified a networks of actors as they were (non-exhaustive) list of relevant stakeholders already exchanging with local for climate adaptation: partners; § Specific communities or regions which § The analysis and mapping process is are vulnerable on the basis of their subjective, as it is based on views and location or because of the major opinions of stakeholders and co- industry that supports them. creation teams. Therefore, the maps § Federal, state and local governments should not be understood as objective and associated groups (e.g. local pictures of the reality, but rather the government associations, various view and interpretation of local government departments and actors. The subjectivity is not advisory groups). necessarily an issue as the core aim of § Infrastructure management agencies the mapping is to understand (responsible for management of ports, stakeholders’ thinking and positions air and land transport, water, energy, and their leverage. and property). The report includes: 1/ maps of the most § Industry groups and particular relevant stakeholders in each pilot region; 2/ a industries, including parks summary of the barriers, drivers and needs for