DOCSLIB.ORG

Approved Tseung Kwan O Outline Zoning Plan No. S/Tko/28

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Approved Tseung Kwan O Outline Zoning Plan No. S/Tko/28 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL BRIEF Town Planning Ordinance (Chapter 131) APPROVED TSEUNG KWAN O OUTLINE ZONING PLAN NO. S/TKO/28 INTRODUCTION At the meeting of the Executive Council on 1 June 2021, the Council ADVISED and the Chief Executive ORDERED that the draft Tseung Kwan O Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) No. S/TKO/27A should be approved under section 9(1)(a) of the Town Planning Ordinance (the Ordinance). The plan is now renumbered as No. S/TKO/28. AMENDMENTS TO THE DRAFT TSEUNG KWAN O OZP NO. S/TKO/26 SINCE ITS REFERENCE BACK 2. Since the reference back of the approved Tseung Kwan O OZP No. S/TKO/26 on 17 December 2019, the draft Tseung Kwan O OZP No. S/TKO/27 (the draft OZP) incorporating the amendments was exhibited on 19 June 2020 for public inspection under section 5 of the Ordinance. The major amendments to the matters shown on the draft OZP include the rezoning of: (a) a site at Chiu Shun Road from an area shown as ‘MTR Pak Shing Kok Ventilation Building’ and “Green Belt” (“GB”) to “Residential (Group A)8” (“R(A)8”) with stipulation of building height restriction of 130mPD to allow for residential use (Amendment Item A); and (b) a strip of land along Chiu Shun Road from an area shown as ‘MTR Pak Shing Kok Ventilation Building’ to ‘Road’ to form part of the future footpath (Amendment Item B). 3. The amendments to the Notes of the approved Tseung Kwan O OZP No. S/TKO/26 include the revision to the Remarks of the Notes for the “Residential (Group A)” zone to incorporate development restrictions including plot ratio (PR) restriction of 6 for the “R(A)8” zone; and technical amendments in accordance with the latest version of the Master Schedule of Notes to Statutory Plans. Opportunities had also been taken to update the Explanatory Statement to reflect the latest status and planning circumstances of the draft OZP. REPRESENTATIONS AND COMMENTS ON REPRESENTATIONS 4. During the exhibition of the draft OZP, 130 valid representations were received. On 4 September 2020, the representations were published for comment and six valid comments on the representations (comments) were received. The representations and comments were considered by the Board at its meeting held on 19 February 2021. The main grounds and proposals of the representations and the comments together with the main points of the Board’s response and decisions are highlighted in the following paragraphs. Representations 5. 129 out of 130 valid representations were adverse representations objecting to the amendment items. Among them, 100 representations (R1 to R10, R13 to R102) objected to both Amendment Items A and B and 29 representations (R11, R12, R103 to R129) objected to Amendment Item A only; and the remaining one representation (R130) provided views on the amendments. The adverse representations were submitted by 12 members of Sai Kung District Council (SKDC) (including two then members of SKDC) (R1 to R12); the Owners’ Committee of Nan Fung Plaza (R13); two concern groups, namely, No More Junk Bay (R14) and Sai Kung Planning Concern Front (R15); and 114 individuals. The Hong Kong and China Gas Company Limited (R130) provided views on the amendments. Grounds/Proposals of Representations 6. The major grounds and proposals of the representations on Amendment Item A are summarised below1 – Adverse Representations (R1 to R129) Housing Needs and Infill Residential Development (a) the density in Hang Hau/Tseung Kwan O was already too high. The rezoning of the site for the proposed building height restriction (BHR) of 130mPD did not comply with the stepped height urban design principle in the area. Infill residential development could not resolve the housing shortage. Additional public housing had already been provided at Chiu Shun Road. The Government should consider other available land use options, such as brownfield and the Tseung Kwan O Area 137. The proposed private housing development could not meet the public housing need and the Government failed to provide public and private housing in the ratio of 70:30; Impact on Greenery (b) the proposed development was not in line with the planning intention 1 R1 to R10, R13 to R102 objected to Amendment Item B without providing any ground/reason. Page 2 of the “GB” zone. It would reduce the greenery provision in the area and cause damage to the natural hillside area. The existing trees which were recommended to be removed appeared healthier than the descriptions in the tree survey report. Green panorama could mitigate odour and environmental impact of landfill; Impacts on Air Ventilation and Local Environment (c) the proposed high-rise development would create and/or exacerbate the ‘walled effect’, which would adversely affect the wind circulation. It would also generate adverse air ventilation impact on the surrounding area and lead to ‘heat island effect’ and increase the use of electricity from air-conditioning. The Air Ventilation Assessment report did not provide sufficient information on the impact on the wind corridor along Chiu Shun Road; (d) the proposed development would worsen the air quality in the locality due to the reduction of green area and lesser air ventilation. It would also obstruct natural sunlight and affect the residents’ well-being. Open views of the nearby residents towards the green hillside would be adversely affected; Noise and Air Quality Impacts (e) the proposed site was unsuitable for living as there was significant traffic noise. The construction of the proposed development would cause noise nuisance/ air pollution to the surrounding residents; Traffic Impact (f) the proposed development would increase traffic flow and exacerbate the traffic congestion in the area (e.g. at Tseung Kwan O Tunnel). Existing transport facilities (including parking spaces)/services (including bus and minibus services) and the already saturated MTR rail facilities/services were inadequate to support the proposed population; (g) the Traffic Impact Assessment did not cover all the affected areas and failed to demonstrate the impact of the proposed development on the whole Tseung Kwan O area; Provision of Community Facilities (h) the provisions of educational and medical facilities, hospital, recreational area/open space were inadequate in the area. The amendment would further reduce recreational and public space in Hang Hau. Additional recreational, educational and other community facilities (e.g. municipal building, market, recreational space, elderly centre, community centre or car park) should be provided in the area/at the site; Page 3 Impact on Traditions (i) the impact on fung shui and burial grounds in nearby villages (e.g. Fat Tau Chau Village) had not been considered; Other Aspects (j) there would be potential health issues to the future residents living atop the ventilation building as well as potential safety risk for the proposed development in close proximity to the slope; (k) there were no precedent cases and evidence showing that the operation of the ventilation building would not be affected. The proposal would involve complex construction works and huge cost. It was unfounded and unscientific to justify in the technical assessments that there would be no adverse impacts based on the small scale of the development; (l) there had not been sufficient public consultation and the views of SKDC and the opposing views of residents nearby (i.e. La Cite Noble) had not been taken into consideration; (m) the proposed development involved transfer of benefits between the Government and MTR Corporation Limited (MTRCL); and Representation Providing Views on Amendment Item A (n) as the proposed development was in close proximity to a high pressure pipeline along Chiu Shun Road, the future developer should conduct a Quantitative Risk Assessment and consult the Hong Kong and China Gas Co. Ltd. (R130) as appropriate. Comments on the Representations 7. Among the six valid comments from MTRCL (C1) and individuals (C2 to C6) received, one commenter (C6) was also a representer (R94). The grounds/views of the comments are summarized below - C1 to C4 (a) the proposed residential development was an initiative in response to the Policy Address to explore the development potential along railways with the objective to increase housing supply. Technical assessments conducted confirmed that no significant adverse impact would result from the proposed development from air ventilation, environmental, traffic, sewerage, drainage, geotechnical, landscape and visual aspects. Given the scale of the proposed development, it was unlikely to cause any adverse impact on existing roads, infrastructure, railway network and government, institution or community (GIC) facilities; Page 4 (b) the proposed development utilised an idle site to increase housing supply. Green space was more than sufficient in Tseung Kwan O, hence the proposed development would not cause any impact on the nearby residents; (c) there were precedent cases of residential development atop ventilation building in Yau Tong and rezoning “GB” sites to residential sites in Tseung Kwan O and appropriate requirements, such as improvement on pedestrian crossing facilities and provision of more parking spaces and recreational facilities, could be imposed to help alleviate adverse impacts on the nearby residents. Besides, appropriate planning and design measures could alleviate adverse air ventilation impacts on surrounding developments; (d) single ownership at the proposed development could speed up housing development; C5 and C6 (e) the proposed development would increase the burden on the already inadequate community/social welfare facilities. The Board should question whether there were any GIC facilities that could be relocated to the site to free up better locations elsewhere for elderly and child care facilities, while maintaining the current low rise and unobtrusive ambience; (f) the main function of the “GB” zone was to preserve the natural environment, beautify the city, improve the landscape, and limit excessive development. Its original intention was violated; and (g) as there was no open tender for the proposed development, it appeared to be a transfer of benefits between MTRCL and the Government.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel Terrestrial Archaeological Review and and Associated Works – Investigation Marine Archaeological Investigation (Final)
    Agreement No. CE 42/2008 (CE) Working Paper on Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel Terrestrial Archaeological Review and and Associated Works – Investigation Marine Archaeological Investigation (Final) Agreement No. CE 42/2008 (CE) Tseung Kwan O – Lam Tin Tunnel and Associated Works – Investigation Working Paper on Terrestrial Archaeological Review and Marine Archaeological Investigation (Final) Contents Page 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives of this Working Paper ................................................................... 2 1.3 Structure of this Paper .................................................................................... 3 2 ENVIORNMENTAL LEGISLATION AND STANDARDS................................... 5 2.1 Overview ....................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Enviornmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (Cap.499) ............................... 5 2.3 Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process ........ 5 2.4 Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (Cap.53) ............................................ 5 2.5 Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines ............................................. 6 2.6 Guidelines for Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment ...................................... 6 2.7 Guidelines for Marine Archaeological
    [Show full text]
  • Sai Kung Community Care Fund
    Community Care Fund "Pilot Scheme on Support for Elderly Persons Discharged from Public Hospitals After Treatment" Approved Service Providers - List of Service Units (Transitional Community Care and Support Services) (Updated on 1 August 2019) Sai Kung District Home Care Day Care (location of S/N Agency Name Service Unit Name Address (Home Care Office) Serving District(s) Address (Day Care Centre) Serving District(s) Tel Fax Service Service service unit) Room 306A, 311-312 and 330-335, Room 311-312 and 330-335, Hong Haven of Hope Christian Haven of Hope Tsui Lam Day Training Kwun Tong, 1 Hong Lam House, Tsui Lam Estate, Lam House, Tsui Lam Estate, Tseung Kwun Tong, Sai Kung 5281 6325 2704 9282 Service Centre for the Elderly Sai Kung Tseung Kwan O, New Territories Kwan O, New Territories Sai Kung District Community Centre Sai Kung District Community Centre Sai Kung District Sai Kung District Community Centre Limited Jockey Club Integrated Limited Jockey Club Integrated Sai Kung 2 Sai Kung Sai Kung 2792 1762 2791 0247 Community Centre Limited Limited Services Centre, 8 Mei Yuen Street, Services Centre, 8 Mei Yuen Street, Sai Kung, New Territories Sai Kung, New Territories The Hong Kong Society for SAGE Tung Lin Kok Yuen Home for the 4/F, On Lam House. Tsui Lam Estate, 3 Sai Kung 2702 0066 2174 8043 the Aged Elderly / / Tseung Kwan O, New Territories Kwun Tong, Christian Family Service Shop 4, G/F, Choi Sing House, Choi Wong Tai Sin, 4 Mind Delight & Cognitive Training Centre / / 2793 2138 3572 0634 Centre Ha Estate, Kowloon Bay, Kowloon Sai Kung, Kowloon City Kwun Tong, Tung Wah Group of Henry G.
    [Show full text]
  • Geodiversity, Geoconservation and Geotourism in Hong Kong Global
    Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 126 (2015) 426–437 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pgeola Geodiversity, geoconservation and geotourism in Hong Kong Global Geopark of China Lulin Wang *, Mingzhong Tian, Lei Wang School of Earth Science and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: In addition to being an international financial center, Hong Kong has rich geodiversity, in terms of a Received 22 November 2014 representative and comprehensive system of coastal landscapes, with scientific value in the study of Received in revised form 20 February 2015 Quaternary global sea-level changes, and esthetic, recreational and cultural value for tourism. The value Accepted 26 February 2015 of the coastal landscapes in Hong Kong was globally recognized when Hong Kong Global Geopark Available online 14 April 2015 (HKGG), which was developed under the well-established framework of Hong Kong Country Parks and Marine Parks, was accepted in the Global Geoparks Network (GGN) in 2011. With over 30 years of Keywords: experience gained from managing protected areas and a concerted effort to develop geoconservation and Coastal landscape geotourism, HKGG has reached a mature stage of development and can provide a well-developed Hong Kong Global Geopark Geodiversity example of successful geoconservation and geotourism in China. This paper analyzes the geodiversity, Geoconservation geoconservation and geotourism of HKGG. The main accomplishments summarized in this paper are Geotourism efficient conservation management, an optimized tourism infrastructure, a strong scientific interpretation system, mass promotion and education materials, active exchange with other geoparks, continuous training, and effective collaboration with local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • PWSC(2021-22)5 on 21 April 2021
    For discussion PWSC(2021-22)5 on 21 April 2021 ITEM FOR PUBLIC WORKS SUBCOMMITTEE OF FINANCE COMMITTEE HEAD 705 – CIVIL ENGINEERING Transport – Ferry Piers 58TF – Improvement works at Kau Sai Village Pier 59TF – Improvement works at Lai Chi Chong Pier Members are invited to recommend to the Finance Committee – (a) the upgrading of 58TF to Category A at an estimated cost of $77.8 million in money-of-the-day (MOD) prices; and (b) the upgrading of 59TF to Category A at an estimated cost of $108.8 million in MOD prices. PROBLEM We need to carry out the following works – (a) 58TF for reconstruction of Kau Sai Village Pier to improve the berthing condition and facilities of the pier; and (b) 59TF for reconstruction of Lai Chi Chong Pier to improve the structural condition and facilities of the pier. /PROPOSAL ….. PWSC(2021-22)5 Page 2 PROPOSAL 2. The Director of Civil Engineering and Development, with the support of the Secretary for Development, proposes to upgrade the following projects to Category A – (a) 58TF at an estimated cost of $77.8 million in MOD prices for the reconstruction of Kau Sai Village Pier; and (b) 59TF at an estimated cost of $108.8 million in MOD prices for the reconstruction of Lai Chi Chong Pier. PROJECT SCOPE 3. Details of the above two projects are provided at Enclosures 1 and 2 respectively. -------------------------------------- Development Bureau April 2021 Enclosure 1 to PWSC(2021-22)5 58TF – Improvement works at Kau Sai Village Pier PROJECT SCOPE We propose to upgrade 58TF to Category A and the scope of works comprises – (a) reconstruction of the existing pier, including provision of ancillary facilities such as roof cover, lighting system, benches, solar panels, Wi-Fi device, etc.; and (b) environmental monitoring and mitigation measures for the proposed works.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Transport and Housing Bureau The Government of the Hong Kong SAR FINAL REPORT Consultancy Services for Providing Expert Advice on Rationalising the Utilization of Road Harbour Crossings In Association with September 2010 CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR PROVIDING EXPERT ADVICE ON RATIONALISING THE UTILISATION OF ROAD HARBOUR CROSSINGS FINAL REPORT September 2010 WILBUR SMITH ASSOCIATES LIMITED CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR PROVIDING EXPERT ADVICE ON RATIONALISING THE UTILISATION OF ROAD HARBOUR CROSSINGS FINAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Title Page 1 BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Report Structure ............................................................................................................. 1-3 2 STUDY METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Overview of methodology ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 7-stage Study Methodology ........................................................................................... 2-2 3 IDENTIFICATION OF EXISTING PROBLEMS ............................................................. 3-1 3.1 Existing Problems
    [Show full text]
  • Sai Kung and Tseung Kwan O Route Bus-Bus Interchange Scheme
    Sai Kung and Tseung Kwan O route Bus-Bus Interchange Scheme This BBI Scheme is provided by NWFB, including Route 694, 792M, 796C, 796E, 796S, 796X, 797M, 798 and 798A. It is designed for passengers traveling between Hong Kong Island, Kowloon and Tseung Kwan O / New Territories East. Passengers should use the same Octopus card to make interchange within prescribed time limit at the following bus stop to enjoy the fare discount. From New Territories / Tseung Kwan O to Kowloon First Journey on Alighting Point Second Journey on Interchange Point Fare Time (Direction) (Direction) Discount Limit 792M from Sai Kung Tiu Keng Leng 796C to So Uk Tiu Keng Leng Adult 90 Station 796E to So Uk Station Less $1.00 minutes 796S to Ngau Tau Kok Station Child / Senior Less $0.50 792M from Sai Kung Tseung Kwan O 796X to Tsim Sha Tsui (E) Tseung Kwan O Adult 90 Station Station Less $1.00 minutes Child / Senior Less $0.50 796C from Oscar by the Sea* Tiu Keng Leng 796X to Tsim Sha Tsui (E) Tseung Kwan O Adult 90 Station PTI PTI Less $4.80 minutes Child / Senior Less $2.40 Tseung Kwan O 796S to Ngau Tau Kok Station Tseung Kwan O Free PTI PTI 797M from Tseung Kwan O Tseung Kwan O 796C to So Uk Tseung Kwan O Adult 90 Industrial Estate* PTI 796X to Tsim Sha Tsui (E) PTI Less $1.00 minutes Child / Senior Less $0.50 796X from Tseung Kwan O Tiu Keng Leng 796C to So Uk Tiu Keng Leng Adult 60 Industrial Estate* Station PTI 796E to So Uk Station PTI Less $5.70 minutes Child / Senior Less $2.80 * BBI discounts are available for first journey passengers boarding before Tiu Keng Leng and Tseung Kwan O.
    [Show full text]
  • Tseung Kwan O - 及 Lam Tin Tunnel Cross Bay Link
    Tseung Kwan O - 及 Lam Tin Tunnel Cross Bay Link Proposed Scheme – Consultation Digest Kwun Tong Tseung Kwan O Lam Tin Tiu Keng Leng TKO Town Centre South Yau Tong Junk Bay Lam Tin Interchange TKO Area 86 January 2012 Project Information Legends: Benefits Proposed Interchange • Upon completion of Route 6, the new road • The existing Tseung Kwan O Tunnel is operating Kai Tak Tseung Kwan O - Lam Tin Tunnel network will relieve the existing heavily near its maximum capacity at peak hours. The trafficked road network in the central and TKO-LT Tunnel and CBL will relieve the existing Kowloon Bay Cross Bay Link eastern Kowloon areas, and hence reduce travel traffic congestion and cater for the anticipated Kwun Tong Trunk Road T2 time for vehicles across these areas and related traffic generated from the planned development Yau Ma Tei Central Kowloon Route environmental impacts. of Tseung Kwan O. To Kwa Wan Lam Tin Tseung Kwan O Table 1: Traffic Improvement - Kwun Tong District Yau Tong From Yau Tong to Journey Time West Kowloon Area (Peak Hour) Current (2012) 22 min. Schematic Alignment of Route 6 and Cross Bay Link Via Route 6 8 min. Traffic Congestion at TKO Tunnel The Tseung Kwan O - Lam Tin Tunnel (TKO-LT Tunnel) At present, the existing Tseung Kwan O Tunnel is towards Kowloon in the morning is a dual-two lane highway of approximately 4.2km the main connection between Tseung Kwan O and Table 2: Traffic Improvement - Tseung Kwan O long, connecting Tseung Kwan O (TKO) and East urban areas of Kowloon.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council Brief -- Unusual Ground Settlement in Tseung Kwan O
    Ref. L/M(3) in WB(CR) 38/01/15(00) LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL BRIEF UNUSUAL GROUND SETTLEMENT IN TSEUNG KWAN O INTRODUCTION At the meeting of the Executive Council on 21 November 2000, the Council noted the investigation findings on the unusual ground settlement in Tseung Kwan O (TKO). BACKGROUND 2. Unusual ground settlement in the TKO reclamation was first reported in early 1999. A detailed investigation of the causes of the unusual settlement and its effect on existing buildings and other facilities has now been completed. 3. The extent of area affected by the unusual settlement, comprising mainly Tiu Keng Leng, TKO town centre, TKO Area 86 and the TKO Industrial Estate (TKOIE), is shown in Figure 1 at Annex A. The locations of existing residential buildings (in three zones) at the affected town centre are shown in Figure 2 at Annex B. MAGNITUDE OF SETTLEMENT AND LATEST STATUS 4. The magnitude of settlement varies in different areas. At Tiu Keng Leng and the part of town centre to the north of Tong Ming Street, the settlement was very small being in the range of only 70 to 80 mm measured since early 1999. Further south of the town centre between Tong Ming Street and Tong Tak Street, this settlement measured since early 1999 ranged from 150 to 270 mm. In other areas of TKO reclamation, including Area 86 and TKOIE, the settlement ranged from 50 to about 800 mm. 1 5. In almost all the areas, the highest rate of settlement (approximately 40 mm per month at the town centre and up to 160 mm per month for part of other areas) was recorded in the first six to nine months of 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Designated 7-11 Convenience Stores
    Store # Area Region in Eng Address in Eng 0001 HK Happy Valley G/F., Winner House,15 Wong Nei Chung Road, Happy Valley, HK 0009 HK Quarry Bay Shop 12-13, G/F., Blk C, Model Housing Est., 774 King's Road, HK 0028 KLN Mongkok G/F., Comfort Court, 19 Playing Field Rd., Kln 0036 KLN Jordan Shop A, G/F, TAL Building, 45-53 Austin Road, Kln 0077 KLN Kowloon City Shop A-D, G/F., Leung Ling House, 96 Nga Tsin Wai Rd, Kowloon City, Kln 0084 HK Wan Chai G6, G/F, Harbour Centre, 25 Harbour Rd., Wanchai, HK 0085 HK Sheung Wan G/F., Blk B, Hiller Comm Bldg., 89-91 Wing Lok St., HK 0094 HK Causeway Bay Shop 3, G/F, Professional Bldg., 19-23 Tung Lo Wan Road, HK 0102 KLN Jordan G/F, 11 Nanking Street, Kln 0119 KLN Jordan G/F, 48-50 Bowring Street, Kln 0132 KLN Mongkok Shop 16, G/F., 60-104 Soy Street, Concord Bldg., Kln 0150 HK Sheung Wan G01 Shun Tak Centre, 200 Connaught Rd C, HK-Macau Ferry Terminal, HK 0151 HK Wan Chai Shop 2, 20 Luard Road, Wanchai, HK 0153 HK Sheung Wan G/F., 88 High Street, HK 0226 KLN Jordan Shop A, G/F, Cheung King Mansion, 144 Austin Road, Kln 0253 KLN Tsim Sha Tsui East Shop 1, Lower G/F, Hilton Tower, 96 Granville Road, Tsimshatsui East, Kln 0273 HK Central G/F, 89 Caine Road, HK 0281 HK Wan Chai Shop A, G/F, 151 Lockhart Road, Wanchai, HK 0308 KLN Tsim Sha Tsui Shop 1 & 2, G/F, Hart Avenue Plaza, 5-9A Hart Avenue, TST, Kln 0323 HK Wan Chai Portion of shop A, B & C, G/F Sun Tao Bldg, 12-18 Morrison Hill Rd, HK 0325 HK Causeway Bay Shop C, G/F Pak Shing Bldg, 168-174 Tung Lo Wan Rd, Causeway Bay, HK 0327 KLN Tsim Sha Tsui Shop 7, G/F Star House, 3 Salisbury Road, TST, Kln 0328 HK Wan Chai Shop C, G/F, Siu Fung Building, 9-17 Tin Lok Lane, Wanchai, HK 0339 KLN Kowloon Bay G/F, Shop No.205-207, Phase II Amoy Plaza, 77 Ngau Tau Kok Road, Kln 0351 KLN Kwun Tong Shop 22, 23 & 23A, G/F, Laguna Plaza, Cha Kwo Ling Rd., Kwun Tong, Kln.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Management of Recreation and Sports Facilities in Sai Kung District in May and June 2020 by the Leisure and Cultural Services Department
    Sai Kung District Council District Facilities Management Committee Committee Paper for 14.7.2020 SKDC(DFMC) Paper No. 70/20 (Revised) Report on the Management of Recreation and Sports Facilities in Sai Kung District in May and June 2020 by the Leisure and Cultural Services Department Purpose This paper briefs Members on the management of recreation and sports facilities by the Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LCSD) in Sai Kung District in May and June 2020. Background 2. To give Members a better understanding of the services provided by the LCSD, the LCSD makes regular submissions on the management and the usage of recreation and sports facilities in Sai Kung District. Management of Recreation and Sports Facilities 3. In view of the alleviation of COVID-19 recently, the LCSD had reopened the facilities in phases from 6 May 2020 onwards for public use. Details of the usage of recreation and sports facilities in Sai Kung District in May and June 2020 are tabulated in Annex I. 4. The major services provided by the LCSD’s contractors in Sai Kung District are cleansing, horticultural maintenance and security guard services and their performances were satisfactory. The LCSD carries out regular inspections to monitor the work and performance of the contractors. Improvement Projects 5. Please refer to Annex II for information on facility improvement project conducted in Sai Kung District in May and June 2020. 6. The maintenance contractor of Tiu Keng Leng Sports Centre accidentally damaged a fire services sprinkler head when undergoing routine maintenance of lighting fittings in the arena in December last year.
    [Show full text]
  • 7-Eleven Store List – Return Service Store No
    7-Eleven Store List – Return Service Store No. Dist ADDRESS 0001 D03 G/F., Winner House,15 Wong Nei Chung Road, Happy Valley, HK 0008 D01 Shop C, G/F., Elle Bldg., 192-198 Shaukiwan Road, Shaukiwan, HK 0009 D01 Shop 12-13, G/F., Blk C, Model Housing Est., 774 King's Road, HK 0011 D07 Shop No. 6-11, G/F., Godfrey Ctr., 175-185 Lai Chi Kok Rd., Kln 0015 D12 Shop D., G/F., Win Cheung Hse, 131-137 Sha Tsui Road, Tsuen Wan, NT Shop B2A,B2B, 2-32 Man Tai St, Wing Wah Bldg & Wing Yuen Bldg, Blk F&G,Whampoa 0016 D06 Est, Kln 0022 D14 Shop No. 57, G/F., Hop Yick Ctr., 31 Hop Yick Rd., Yuen Long, NT 0030 D02 Shop Nos. 6-9, G/F., Ning Fung Mansion, Nos. 25-31 Main St., Apleichau, HK 0035 D04 Shop J G/F, San Po Kong Mansion, Nos. 2-32 Yin Hing St, Kowloon 0036 D06 Shop A, G/F, TAL Building, 45-53 Austin Road, Kln 0037 D04 G/F, 109 Geranum House, Ma Tau Wai Estate, Kln 0058 D05 Shop D, G/F & C/L, Lap Hing Bldg., 37-43 Ting On St., Ngau Tau Kok, Kln 0067 D13 G/F., Shops A & B, Golden Court, 42-58 Yan Oi Tong Circuit, Tuen Mun, NT 0069 D07 B2, G/F, Yuet Bor Building, 10-12 Shun Fong Street, Kwai Chung, NT 0070 D07 Shop 15-17, G/F, Block 9, Pak Tin Estate, Kln 0077 D08 Shop A-D, G/F., Leung Ling House, 96 Nga Tsin Wai Rd, Kowloon City, Kln 0083 D04 Shop D, G/F&C/L Yuk Wah Mansion, 1-11 Fong Wah Lane, Tsz Wan Shan, Kln 0084 D03 G6, G/F, Harbour Centre, 25 Harbour Rd., Wanchai, HK 0085 D02 G/F., Blk B, Hiller Comm Bldg., 89-91 Wing Lok St., HK 0086 D07 Shop 1, Mei Shan House, Block 42, Shekkipmei Estate, Kln 0093 D08 Shop 7, G/F, Hing Wong Mansion, 79 Tai Kok Tsui Road, Kln 0094 D03 Shop 3, G/F, Professional Bldg., 19-23 Tung Lo Wan Road, HK 0096 D01 62-74, Shaukiwan Main East Road, Shaukiwan, HK 0098 D13 8-9 Comm.
    [Show full text]
  • Legco Panel on Transport Public Transport Interchanges at Hang Hau Station, Tseung Kwan O Station and Tiu Keng Leng Station of T
    LegCo Panel on Transport Public Transport Interchanges at Hang Hau Station, Tseung Kwan O Station and Tiu Keng Leng Station of the MTR Tseung Kwan O Extension PURPOSE This paper briefs Member on the plan of the Administration to make a submission to the Public Works Subcommittee of the Legislative Council for the upgrading of the proposed public transport interchanges (PTIs) at Hang Hau (HAH) Station, Tseung Kwan O (TKO) Station and Tiu Keng Leng (TKL) Station of the MTR Tseung Kwan O Extension (TKE) to Category A of the Public Works Programme. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 2. The population of Hang Hau, TKO Town Centre (in the vicinity of Area 56) and Tiu Keng Leng in TKO is forecast to increase to about 84,000, 142,000 and 80,000 respectively by 2011. To meet the increase in demand for public transport interchange in these areas, we need to construct the three proposed PTIs to provide sufficient facilities for passengers to change between the MTR TKE and buses and green minibuses, and for loading/unloading for taxis and general vehicles. 3. The Government authorized the MTR TKE project in October 1998 and the MTR Corporation Limited (MTRCL) subsequently started construction in end 1998. The first phase of MTR TKE including the HAH, TKO and TKL Stations will be commissioned in end 2002. We need to provide the three proposed PTIs in time for the opening the MTR TKE. 4. To avoid interface problems and to ensure timely completion of the proposed PTIs, we will entrust the design and construction of the PTIs to MTRCL as part of the land grant for the associated property developments at HAH, TKO and TKL Stations.
    [Show full text]