DOCSLIB.ORG

AIP) Supports Investment in Oregon Airports

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AIP) Supports Investment in Oregon Airports How the Federal Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Supports Investment in Oregon Airports • 51 airports in Oregon have identified $302.1 million in unfunded improvements needed over the next five years that would be eligible for AIP grants. • There are 4,003 aircraft based at these airports, with 8.9 million enplanements each year. • Over the last decade, Oregon airports have received 429 grants worth a total of $572.7 million through the AIP. • 83 percent of that funding—$477.2 million—has gone towards projects that included the construction, repair, upgrade or rehabilitation of airport runways, aprons or taxiways. AIP Grants for Oregon Airports, by FFY $90 $80 $76.6 $7.1 $70 $65.0 $62.5 $64.3 $1.9 $60 $55.8 $2.9 $53.9 $52.0 $15.9 $5.9 $50 $9.7 $42.1 $38.2 $17.8 $40 in millions in $69.5 $7.8 $13.2 $30 $26.2 $59.6 $62.4 $4.3 $49.9 $49.1 $20 $44.2 $34.2 $30.4 $28.9 $10 $21.9 $0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Projects that include runway, taxiway or apron repair/construction work Other projects Total AIP Grants by Type of Airport, AIP Construction-Related Grants by FFY 2007-2016 Type of Airport, FFY 2007-2016 Commercial Commercial Reliever, Other, $1.7, Other, $4.0, Service, Service, Reliever, $26.0, 6% 1% $27.3, 5% 1% $11.5, 2% $9.8, 2% General General Aviation, Aviation, $165.9, 31% $141.0, 31% Primary, Primary, $328.0, 61% $271.9, 60% © 2017 The American Road & Transportation Builders Association (ARTBA). All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of ARTBA. All data from the Federal Aviation Administration . Airport Improvement Program Funds at Oregon Airports (in thousand $) Value of AIP Grants % of AIP Funds Identified Value of AIP for Projects That Number of Used for Projects Airport Development needs Airport Grants, 2007 Include Runway, Aircraft Housed Type of Service at Airport With Construction Enplanements Eligible for AIP to 2016 Taxiway or Apron at Airport Improvements Grants, 2017 to 2021 Improvements Albany Municipal $2,564.2 $1,895.0 73.9% 0 51 $2,644.0 General Aviation Ashland Municipal-Sumner Parker Field $2,585.6 $2,357.6 91.2% 2 55 $1,983.1 General Aviation Astoria Regional $8,317.7 $7,877.4 94.7% 4 47 $7,181.1 General Aviation Aurora State $7,021.3 $6,322.3 90.0% 4,362 435 $4,641.1 General Aviation Baker City Municipal $3,161.9 $3,086.9 97.6% 1,432 25 $1,031.1 General Aviation Bandon State $764.5 $399.5 52.3% 0 37 $4,338.3 General Aviation Bend Municipal $19,689.1 $12,549.3 63.7% 18 226 $2,979.6 General Aviation Boardman $1,571.9 $1,571.9 100.0% 0 0 $0.0 General Aviation Brookings $2,100.8 $1,086.1 51.7% 0 31 $1,373.3 General Aviation Burns Municipal $5,441.4 $5,441.4 100.0% 0 14 $2,417.7 General Aviation Chiloquin State $1,979.1 $1,979.1 100.0% 0 8 $1,044.4 General Aviation Christmas Valley $1,599.8 $1,599.8 100.0% 0 0 $22.2 General Aviation City-County $150.0 $0.0 0.0% n/a n/a $0.0 General Aviation Columbia Gorge Regional/The Dalles Municipal $5,905.3 $5,580.3 94.5% 11 59 $2,000.0 General Aviation Condon State Pauling Field $240.4 $240.4 100.0% 0 8 $1,637.8 General Aviation Corvallis Municipal $1,515.0 $990.9 65.4% 28 163 $7,097.8 General Aviation Cottage Grove State $3,142.5 $3,062.5 97.5% 0 46 $1,377.8 General Aviation Crater Lake-Klamath Regional $7,291.7 $7,291.7 100.0% n/a n/a $0.0 Commercial Service Eastern Oregon Regional at Pendleton $3,993.0 $2,490.6 62.4% 4,015 63 $1,921.1 Commercial Service Florence Municipal $1,217.2 $1,134.3 93.2% 0 12 $1,655.5 General Aviation Gold Beach Municipal $1,594.9 $1,032.5 64.7% 0 12 $795.0 General Aviation Grant County Regional/Ogilvie Field $2,652.5 $2,383.9 89.9% 0 15 $4,728.6 General Aviation Grants Pass $3,722.9 $3,627.9 97.4% 0 201 $2,388.9 General Aviation Hermiston Municipal $4,246.0 $3,976.0 93.6% 0 41 $1,493.9 General Aviation Hobby Field $663.8 $0.0 0.0% 0 116 $4,122.2 General Aviation Illinois Valley $1,529.3 $394.2 25.8% 0 23 $2,638.9 General Aviation Independence State $31.0 $31.0 100.0% 0 165 $1,475.0 General Aviation Joseph State $2,432.2 $1,791.2 73.6% 2 10 $1,020.0 General Aviation Ken Jernstedt Airfield $4,623.5 $4,435.4 95.9% 2 33 $3,615.5 General Aviation Klamath Falls $211.9 $0.0 0.0% 4,800 105 $4,596.7 Commercial Service Klamath Falls $27,771.0 $23,141.9 83.3% n/a n/a $0.0 Primary La Grande/Union County $10,727.1 $10,466.7 97.6% 0 69 $3,133.3 General Aviation Lake County $3,615.3 $3,484.3 96.4% 0 11 $2,971.3 General Aviation Lebanon State $3,403.4 $2,751.4 80.8% 0 51 $1,739.9 General Aviation Lexington $2,265.2 $2,132.2 94.1% 0 12 $727.8 General Aviation Madras Municipal $2,684.2 $2,684.2 100.0% 0 42 $2,751.9 General Aviation Airport Improvement Program Funds at Oregon Airports (in thousand $) Value of AIP Grants % of AIP Funds Identified Value of AIP for Projects That Number of Used for Projects Airport Development needs Airport Grants, 2007 Include Runway, Aircraft Housed Type of Service at Airport With Construction Enplanements Eligible for AIP to 2016 Taxiway or Apron at Airport Improvements Grants, 2017 to 2021 Improvements Mahlon Sweet Field $33,646.5 $21,624.4 64.3% 440,198 185 $33,207.9 Primary McDermitt State $267.4 $267.4 100.0% 0 0 $2,197.8 General Aviation McMinnville Municipal $12,730.1 $12,462.2 97.9% 42 95 $4,611.1 General Aviation McNary Field $6,079.9 $3,141.7 51.7% 7 150 $11,416.7 General Aviation McNary Field $1,145.0 $890.0 77.7% n/a n/a $0.0 Primary Mulino State $393.5 $0.0 0.0% 0 58 $1,258.3 General Aviation Myrtle Creek Municipal $937.1 $850.0 90.7% 0 9 $458.3 General Aviation Newport Municipal $9,912.8 $8,825.6 89.0% 3 28 $4,313.9 General Aviation Ontario Municipal $1,860.3 $1,463.9 78.7% 20 66 $944.7 General Aviation Portland Downtown $0.0 $0.0 0.0% 0 0 $0.0 General Aviation Portland International $155,376.4 $141,600.3 91.1% 7,878,760 78 $52,211.9 Primary Portland-Hillsboro $23,011.0 $21,711.0 94.4% 12 251 $32,611.1 Reliever Portland-Troutdale $4,285.2 $4,285.2 100.0% 10 122 $11,418.2 Reliever Prineville $5,170.6 $4,611.2 89.2% 0 110 $3,783.3 General Aviation Roberts Field $45,229.7 $37,664.5 83.3% 255,654 83 $29,693.3 Primary Rogue Valley International-Medford $47,639.4 $35,931.6 75.4% 323,563 210 $17,275.1 Primary Roseburg Regional $8,315.5 $7,804.2 93.9% 5 92 $1,097.8 General Aviation Scappoose Industrial Airpark $1,280.9 $422.3 33.0% 3 113 $4,276.6 General Aviation Seaside Municipal $1,276.7 $1,051.7 82.4% 0 4 $0.0 General Aviation Siletz Bay State $740.4 $540.4 73.0% 0 11 $1,244.4 General Aviation Southwest Oregon Regional $17,201.0 $11,015.7 64.0% 15,080 56 $4,266.7 Primary Sportsman Airpark $0.0 $0.0 0.0% 0 53 $0.0 General Aviation State of Oregon $2,242.0 $0.0 0.0% n/a n/a $0.0 n/a Sunriver $0.0 $0.0 0.0% 18 0 $0.0 General Aviation Tillamook $3,740.8 $3,146.6 84.1% 0 38 $2,292.2 General Aviation Various Locations in Oregon $1,715.5 $1,715.5 100.0% n/a n/a $0.0 n/a Wasco State $83.5 $0.0 0.0% 0 5 $0.0 General Aviation TOTAL $536,707.7 $450,315.2 83.9% 8,928,051 4,003 $302,124.2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Individual Airport Reports
    Table of Contents – Individual Airport Reports Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 2.1 Oregon Aviation Plan 2007 ( OAP 2007 ) Study Components 2.1.a State Aviation System Plan 2.1.b State Aviation Master Plan 2.1.c State Aviation Economic Impact Study 2.2 Overall Study Goals & Objectives 2.3 Airport Functional Roles 2.4 Performance Measures 2.5 Summary Chapter 3 3.1 General Airport Description and Location 3.2 Existing Airport Facilities 3.2.a Airside Facilities 3.2.b Landside Facilities 3.2.c Support Facilities 3.3 Current and Forecast Demand 3.3.a Forecasting Approach 3.4 Survey Responses 3.4.a Community Information 3.4.b Economic Development 3.4.c Airport Development and Use 3.4.d Air Shuttle 3.5 Summary Chapter 4 4.1 Airport Facility and Service Needs 4.1.a Recommendations Based on Performance Criteria 4.1.b General Observations and Recommendations 4.1.c Airport Capital Improvement Program 4.1.d Other Potential Improvements for Consideration 4.2 Definition of Airport System Role 4.3 Economic Impact Analysis 4.3.a Contribution of Airport to the Economy of Oregon Figures Chapter 3 3.1 Location Map Tables Chapter 2 2.1 Public-Use Airports in Oregon 2.2 OAP 2007 Recommended Airport Classification Chapter 3 3.1 Summary of Aviation Projections Chapter 4 4.1 Economic Contribution of Airport to the Oregon Economy Individual Airport Reports – Volume II Albany Municipal Airport Chehalem Airpark Alkali Lake State Airport Chiloquin State Airport Arlington Municipal Airport Christmas Valley Airport Ashland Municipal-Sumner Parker Field Columbia Gorge
    [Show full text]
  • STRATEGIC ANALYSIS Mulino Airport
    Chapter One Airport Master Plan Update STRATEGIC ANALYSIS Mulino Airport The objective of this chapter is to determine, through a strategic analysis, the appropriate future role for the Mulino Airport (Airport) within the Portland metro area system of airports. This chapter documents the tasks undertaken for the strategic analysis. The first section defines the current role of the Mulino Airport within the national, state, and Portland metro area systems of airports. In the second section, the roles, activity levels, facilities, services, and development potential of other airports in the Portland metro area are analyzed. The third section summarizes the results of a survey of airport users and aviation service providers in the area regarding the use of the Mulino Airport and its future needs. The chapter ends with analysis conclusions, an evaluation of alternative airport roles, and a recommended future role of the Airport. This recommended role will guide the development of aviation activity forecasts and facility requirements. MULINO AIRPORT’S CURRENT ROLE Mulino Airport’s Role within the National System The Mulino Airport is identified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as one of 2,558 General Aviation (GA) facilities nationwide and is included within the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). GA airports do not have scheduled passenger service. There are several criteria allowing an airport to be included in the NPIAS; however, the general criteria are that the airport has at least 10 based aircraft and is located at least 20 miles (30 minutes drive time) from another NPIAS airport. The Mulino Airport meets the based aircraft criteria; however, the Airport is within 13 miles (approximately 19 minutes drive time) of Mulino Airport 1-1 Chapter One - Strategic Analysis another NPIAS airport (Aurora State).
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION Airport Master Plan Update Aurora State Airport
    Chapter One: INTRODUCTION Airport Master Plan Update Aurora State Airport This update to the 2000 Airport Master Plan was undertaken to assess the role of the Aurora State Airport (Airport), evaluate the Airport's capabilities, forecast future aeronautical activity for the next 20 years, and plan for the timely development of any new or expanded Airport facilities needed to accommodate future aviation activity. The owner and operator of the Airport, the Oregon Department of Aviation (ODA), obtained and matched a grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to fund this study. ODA has organized a Planning Advisory Committee (PAC), representing Airport users and neighbors, to participate in the planning process. In addition to six PAC meetings, public involvement in the master plan update includes a website to disseminate information and gather comments and questions, and five open houses for the general public. The purpose of this first draft chapter of the Airport Master Plan Update (Plan) is threefold: • to summarize major issues that the Plan should address • to identify goals for the planning process and for the future development of the Airport • to determine the Airport’s current and future role within the system of airports GOALS Goals for the master plan update were a subject of the first PAC meeting held on July 22, 2010. The common themes of PAC members’ statements have been synthesized and are presented below. The goals are divided between two categories – goals for the planning process and goals for the master plan itself. Planning Process Goals The goals for the planning process should guide the conduct of the ODA, ODA’s consultants, and the PAC throughout the development of the master plan update.
    [Show full text]
  • CWACT) Executive Committee Thursday, April 11, 2019 4:00 – 5:00 Pm Oregon Cascades West, Albany Office
    Cascades West Area Commission on Transportation (CWACT) Executive Committee Thursday, April 11, 2019 4:00 – 5:00 pm Oregon Cascades West, Albany Office AGENDA 1. 4:00 Welcome and Introductions Chair Jaramillo 2. 4:05 Agenda Review Chair 3. 4:10 Approve Minutes from November 16, 2018 and Chair February 14, 2019 Meetings (Attachment A and B) ACTION: Approval of meeting minutes 4. 4:15 CWACT Membership Staff Full Commission Membership Approved by OCWCOG Board on March 21st. Private Sector Appointments TAC Membership Recruitment ACTION: Information Only 5. 4:30 April 25th CWACT Full Commission Agenda Review Staff ACTION: Discuss and provide approval for next meeting agenda items 6. 4:40 Other Business All 2018-2019 COAR Grant Project List Approved (Attachment C) ODOT Update on ADA Program ACTION: Information Only 7. 5:00 Adjournment Chair The Cascades West COG facilities are accessible to persons with disabilities. If you will need any special accommodations to attend the meeting contact Emma Chavez at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. She can be reached at 541-967-8551 (TTY/TTD 711) Attachment A Cascades West Area Commission on Transportation (CWACT) Executive Committee Thursday, November 16, 2018 Albany COG Office 1400 Queen Ave SE, Albany DRAFT MINUTES Attendance: John Huestis, Roger Nyquist, Annabelle Jaramillo, Bill Bain, Doug Hunt, and Barbara Bull Members Absent: Bob Elliott Alternates: James Feldman Staff Present: Phil Warnock, and Tarah Campi 1. Call to Order The Chair, Linn County Commissioner Roger Nyquist, called the meeting to order at 9:34 am. Introductions were conducted. 2. Agenda Review There were no changes to the agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON AVIATION PLAN Economic Impact Statement
    OREGON AVIATION PLAN Economic Impact Statement 2014 for NPIAS Airports Photo courtesy of City of Redmond Municipal Airport OREGON AVIATION PLAN Economic Impact Statement 2014 for NPIAS Airports The 2014 Oregon Aviation Plan Economic Impact Other modes of transportation cannot compete Study (2014 OAP EIS) is presented by the Oregon with aviation’s ability to move people and products Department of Aviation (ODA) and addresses the to where they are most needed safely, quickly and OVERVIEW economic contribution of aviation by Federal Avia- efficiently. Airports are a key component of the tion Administration (FAA) National Plan of Integrat- state’s infrastructure, allowing Oregon businesses ed Airport Systems (NPIAS) airports to the Oregon to do business at a global scale, creating econom- state economy, updating the most recent study, ic growth and opportunity that reaches far outside which was completed in 2007. the airport property. Airports are a key asset to Oregon commerce, Economic impacts of airports include on-airport providing transportation, employment and real economic activities, as well as spending off-airport estate for commercial and industrial develop- by visiting air travelers and those employed by ment, in addition to being infrastructure essential on-airport businesses. This executive summary to emergency response, medical evacuation, fire presents totals for the state and the five state protection and freight transport. NPIAS airports regions as defined by the Oregon Department of contribute more than $8.7 billion to the Oregon Transportation (ODOT). The economic impact of economy annually and provide Oregon businesses individual airport studies and the methodology and residents with just in time shipments of the used to complete the analysis are presented in the goods that keeping Oregon’s businesses moving.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Role of Hillsboro Airport Chapter Two Port of Portland
    PORT OF PORTLAND Chapter Two FUTURE ROLE OF HILLSBORO AIRPORT CHAPTER TWO PORT OF PORTLAND FUTUREFUTURE ROLEROLE OFOF HILLSBOROHILLSBORO AIRPORTAIRPORT The purpose of this chapter of the Airport Master Plan is to analyze the feasibility of alternative roles for Hillsboro Airport within the context of the Portland metropolitan system of airports and State of Oregon system of airports. This analysis provides a foundation for the Port of Portland to determine, specifically and ideally, what Hillsboro Airport's role should be through 2025. This involves considering the probability and viability of supporting scheduled commercial air service and/or air cargo activity at Hillsboro Airport. HILLSBORO AIRPORT'S EXISTING ROLE The role for Hillsboro Airport is defined within both state and federal aviation plans. At the national level, Hillsboro Airport is defined as a reliever airport in the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). Reliever airports are specially designated general aviation airports intended to reduce congestion at large commercial service airports. This reliever role is usually accomplished, not by accommodating commercial flights, but by providing an attractive option for the myriad of non-commercial, general aviation aircraft operations that urban areas generate. Hillsboro Airport is classified as a reliever for Portland International Airport (PDX). In this role, Hillsboro Airport is intended to preserve capacity at PDX by offering an alternative operating area for general
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms &Acronyms
    APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY OF TERMS & ACRONYMS NEWPORT MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Airport Master Plan Update Newport Municipal Airport Master Plan Update A-1 Appendix A DEFINITIONS ABOVE GROUND LEVEL. The elevation of a point or surface above the ground. ACCELERATE – STOP DISTANCE AVAILABLE (ASDA). See declared distances ADVISORY CIRCULAR. External publication issued by the FAA consisting of non-regulatory material providing for the recommendations relative to a policy, guidance and information relative to a specific aviation subject. AIR CARRIER. An operator, which: (1) performs at least five round trips per week between two or more points and publishes flight schedules which specifies the times, days of the week, and places between which such flights are performed; or (2) transport mail by air pursuant to a current contract with the U.S. Postal Service. Certified in accordance with Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Parts 121 and 127. AIR ROUTE TRAFFIC CONTROL CENTER (ARTCC). A facility established to provide air traffic control service to an aircraft operating on an IFR flight plan within controlled airspace and principally during the enroute phase of flight. AIR TAXI. An air carrier certificated in accordance with FAR Part 135 and authorized to provide, on demand, public transportation of persons and property by aircraft. Generally operates small aircraft for hire for specific trips. AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL FACILITIES (ATC-F). Electronic equipment and buildings aiding air traffic control (ATC) for communications, surveillance of aircraft including weather detection and advisory systems. AIRCRAFT. An aircraft is a device that is used or intended to be used for flight in the air. AIRCRAFT APPROACH CATEGORY.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Review Committee (ARC) COAR Grant Review
    Aviation Review Committee (ARC) COAR Grant Review January 11, 2018 ARC Meeting Agenda COAR Grant Cycle 2017 Recap • March 7, 2017 the State Aviation Board unanimously approved the list of projects. • 30 Projects at 20 airports worth $1.6 million were funded. • Timing issues resulted in a delay of the grant agreement process. • Director Swecker allowed for reimbursable items back to March 7, 2017. 1/16/2018 • April 2017 to present: Staff issued award letters and executed grants. • As grants began to execute, more money became available. • We are pleased to say we were able to fund 3 additional projects at 3 airports! • Carry over into COAR 2018: approx. $63k 1/16/2018 Twin Oaks Airpark 2017 COAR project: Taxiway Rehab Redmond Municipal Airport 2017 COAR project: Aviation Fuel System Phase II COAR Grant Cycle 2018 Overview September 1 October 3 – October 13 To October 2 October 16 – December 22 ODA’s completeness ACT review and grading Grant application review available. Late January/Early Feb. March March/April Aviation Review Aviation Board reviews, Staff notifies awarded Committee compiles reprioritizes(as needed) projects and begins the project list to recommend and approves agreement process to Aviation Board recommended apps COAR Cycle 2017-18 Timeline COAR Grant Priorities • 1st priority – Assist with match requirements for FAA Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants • 2nd priority – Safety and infrastructure development • 3rd priority – Aviation-related economic benefits related to airports COAR Minimum Match Requirements Both FAA and non-FAA eligible projects: the level of sponsor/owner grant matching requirements are based upon category of airport as defined in the Oregon Aviation Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Presentation on Asap-Airports Projects
    ASAP Grants 2017-2020 Aviation System Action Program Baker City Municipal Airport South Apron Reconstruction Project 2017 COAR Grant Project COAR Grant Application and Funding Summary: Cycles 1 through 4 % request for funds Grant Grant Applicant Revenue Grant Funds awarded Grant cycle applications awards Requests collected Awarded Cycle 1: 2016- 39.5% 2017 55 32 $4,256,697 $1,737,029 $1,683,072 Cycle 2: 2017- 28.6% 2018 58 24 $5,913,513 $1,848,200 $1,693,212 Cycle 3: 2018- 50% 2019 42 24* $3,896,182 $1,976,446 $1,947,322* Cycle 4: 2019- 43.5% 2020 40 4* $4,504,933 $2,031,346 $550,000* *Total grants and funds awarded were decreased due to FAA AIP 2020 Grants having their match requirement covered by the Federal CARES Act. **Percent of original grant requests awarded INDEX COAR and ROAR Projects Albany Municipal Airport 1 Ashland Municipal Airport 2 Baker City Municipal 3 Bend Municipal Airport 4 Brookings Airport 5 Columbia Gorge Regional/The Dalles Municipal Airport 6 Crater Lake-Klamath Regional Airport 7 Creswell Airport (Hobby Field) 8 Eastern Oregon Regional Airport 9 Enterprise Municipal Airport 10 Eugene Airport (Mahlon Sweet Field) 11 Florence Municipal 12 Gold Beach Municipal Airport 13 Grant County Regional Airport 14 Grants Pass Airport 15 Hermiston Municipal Airport 16 Illinois Valley Airport 17 Ken Jernstedt Airfield 18 La Grande / Union County Airport 19 Lexington Municipal Airport 20 Madras Municipal Airport 21 McMinnville Municipal Airport 22 Newport Municipal Airport 23 Ontario Municipal Airport 24 Port of Astoria Regional
    [Show full text]
  • COAR 2019-20 Awarded Project List
    COAR 2019-20 Awarded Project List COAR Project Type Airport Name Project Name FAA and / or Local Funds ODA Funds Requested Total Project Cost FAA Grant Match Hobby Field (77S) AIP Match Taxilane Improvements - Construction, Phase 2 $ 161,778 $ 16,000 $ 177,778 FAA Grant Match Gold Beach Municipal Airport (4S1) Apron Reconstruction - Phase I Design $ 151,667 $ 15,000 $ 166,667 FAA Grant Match Grants Pass Airport (3S8) Environmental Review of Master Plan Update Projects $ 491,400 $ 48,600 $ 540,000 FAA Grant Match La Grand/Union County Runway 16-34 and Taxiway D Rehabilitation: Phase III - Construction $ 7,500,000 $ 150,000 $ 7,650,000 FAA Grant Match Ontario Municipal Airport Ontario AIP 16- Construct Hangar Taxilanes Project $ 591,500 $ 58,500 $ 650,000 FAA Grant Match Lake County Airport Construct Taxiway C - Phase 1 Design & Environmental $ 202,222 $ 20,000 $ 222,222 FAA Grant Match Tillamook Airport Main Apron Construction $ 267,540 $ 26,460 $ 294,000 FAA Grant Match Albany Municipal Airport AWOS - Automatic Weather Observation System $ 358,944 $ 35,500 $ 394,444 FAA Grant Match Prineville/Crook County Airport Runway 28 Threshold Relocation: Phase II – Construction $ 1,905,560 $ 150,000 $ 2,055,560 FAA Grant Match Lexington Municipal Airport Lexington Municipal Airport - Seal Coat & REIL Installation $ 925,728 $ 91,556 $ 1,017,283 FAA Grant Match Hermiston Municipal Airport Apron Rehabilitation: Phase II - Design $ 141,600 $ 14,000 $ 155,600 FAA Grant Match Newport Municipal Airport Storm Pipe Rehabilitation - Design and Construction
    [Show full text]
  • Newport Municipal Airport Operations Report From
    Newport Municipal Airport Operations Report 12/31/2020 from: DECEMBER 1 – DECEMBER 31, 2020 2020 has been quit the year Newport Municipal Airport. COVID-19 brought challenges resulting in FBO closures, appointment only, to limiting the amount of people based on social distasting requirements, and staff furloughs. But 2020 was not as bad as projected for the calendar year numbers. 2020 calendar year for Newport Municipal Airport. Logged 3,293 landings, and 3,306 take offs, totaling 6,599 logged aircraft operations; 106 Jet aircraft, only 5 short form 2019. Pilots purchased 15,720 gallons of AV-Gas, 32,953 gallons of Jet-A, totaling 48,673 gallons of fuel sold. Averaging out to 15 gallons per landing. The FBO rented 420 cars, which is 63% of 2019’s total 663. 213 courtesy cars were borrowed which is 48% of 2019’s total 444. 2020 highlights for the Airport: Letter from Lincoln County selecting Newport Municipal Airport for new animal shelter location. Gave presentation for Newport Chamber on the airport at the Best Western. Memorandum of Agreement with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Airport. Awarded $3.1 million dollar FAA AIP project for storm pipe rehabilitation and Lake Creek Culvert fish passage mitigation project. This project is fully funded by the FAA. Received $69,000 from CARES Act to help cover operations cost for airport. Memorandum of Agreement with Life Flight to sump Jet-A truck when FBO is closed for holidays or times staffing may not be available. Applied for State of Oregon Department of Aviation COAR grant to help with matching funds for phase II Environmental Assessment of Obstruction Removal Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit 2.1 Types of Airport Ownership
    Airport Land Use Compatibility Guidebook January, 2003 2.0 ODA Goals and Policies Related to Land Use Issues With over 400 airports, the state of Oregon offers significant aeronautics opportunities for transportation and economic activities. As of June 2002, public use airports account for 98 of these facilities and provide the backbone of the aviation system for the state. Ownership of these public use facilities is as diverse as the types of airports themselves. The largest segment, 30 percent, is owned by the Cities, followed closely by the State of Oregon with 29 percent ownership. Private ownership with public access accounts for 15 percent while ownership by a Port Authority is 11 percent. Rounding out the ownership options are 9 percent county-owned facilities, 3 percent federally-owned facilities, and 1 percent owned by other public entities. Exhibit 2.1 represents these classifications. City-owned (30%) 0.3 State-owned (29% 0.29 ExhiPbirivattel 2y-o.w1n edTy p pes0.1 5of Airport Ownership Port Authority-own 0.11 County-owned (9% 0.09 Federally-owned ( 0.03 Other publc entitie 0.03 3.0% 3.0% City-owned (30%) 9.0% 30.0% State-owned (29%) 11.0% Privately-owned public use (15%) Port Authority-owned (11%) County-owned (9%) 15.0% Federally-owned (3%) 29.0% Other publc entities (3%) The important element to observe with these figures is the high percentage of facilities that are publicly owned. This public ownership should lend itself to a more cooperative planning environment since avenues for communication and coordination regarding land use issues should already be in place.
    [Show full text]