Insect Systematics & Evolution 44 (2013) 107–109 brill.com/ise
Corrigendum to: Revision of the New World species of Peritropis Uhler (Hemiptera: Miridae: Cylapinae) (Insect Systematics & Evolution 43 (2012): 213–270, DOI 10.1163/1876312X04303002)
Andrzej Wolskia,* and Thomas J. Henry b aDepartment of Biosystematics, Opole University, Oleska 22, PL-45-052 Opole, Poland bSystematic Entomology Laboratory, ARS, USDA, c/o National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Published 15 April 2013
As a consequence of a lapsus in the production process of our paper, the following corrections were not implemented in our manuscript: p. 214, Abstract, line 3, nicaraguensis. P. plaumanni should read: nicaraguensis, P. plaumanni. p. 215, paragraph 3, the correct listing of the institutions should be:
MACN División Entomología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Buenos Aires, Argentina TAM Department of Entomology, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX, USA USNM National Museum of Natural History (USNM), Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA
p. 216, Fig. 1, the habitus illustration of Peritropis gorczycai sp. n. was meant to be published vertically, not horizontally. p. 217, legend to Figs 2–16, line 2, after “(4 and 5) P. carpinteroi,” there should be no space before the colon; the description of Fig. 5 should read: paratype. p. 219, first paragraph, first line, on females we should read: on females, we. pp. 219–221, Key to the New World Species of Peritropsis: The second rung in all couplets of the identification key should have been moved to the left, with the
© Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, 2013 DOI 10.1163/1876312X-04401005
1/m dash moved even with the couplet numbers and the text aligned with that of the first rung. p. 219, Key to the New World Species of Peritropsis, couplet 1, first rung, Carvalho & Rosas should be on same line as “P. unicolor.” p. 221, couplet 14, first rung, second line, LLS slender slightly sinuate should read: LLS slender, slightly sinuate. p. 226, second paragraph, Description, line 2, Male should read: Male. p. 229, line 3, Redescription should read: Description. p. 229, line 4, Female should read: Female. p. 230, line 10, Female should read: Female. p. 232, paragraph Measurements, line 3, both percent/colon (%:) signs should read: ♂. p. 234, paragraph Etymology, The nameP. gorczycai is named should read: P. gorczycai is named. p. 235, legend to Figs 45–52, AP, apical sclerite should not have been there. p. 236, paragraph Measurements, line 4, both percent/colon (%:) signs should read: ♂. p. 238, legend to Fig. 59, Distribution map of Peritropis ssp. should read: Distribution map of Peritropis spp. p. 238, list of synonyms, under Peritropis husseyi, line 2, 881 should have been indented and the following lines of this paragraph should have been closed up to this. p. 240, paragraph heading Measurements should not have been indented. p. 240, paragraph Measurements, line 4, □□□ should read: ♂; □ should read: ♀; □□ should read: ♀. p. 240, paragraph Measurements, line 5, both □ symbols should read: ♀. p. 241, paragraph Additional material examined, line 3, 1% should read: ♂. p. 241, paragraph Additional material examined, line 5, 1& should read: ♀. p. 241, paragraph Additional material examined, line 8, ♂ should read: ♂♂. p. 241, paragraph Additional material examined line 9, ♂ should read: ♂♂. p. 246, paragraph Type material, line 1, after “Nica” add brackets [ragua]. p. 246, paragraph Type material, line 1, (Malaise) should read: Malaise (MACN). p. 249, legend to Fig. 78, Distribution map of Peritropis ssp. should read: Distribution map of Peritropis spp. p. 252. Line 5, differs however by should read: differs, however, by.