DOCSLIB.ORG

REPORT of the CENTRAL COMMITTEE of the COMMUNIST PARTY of the SOVIET UNION to the 20Th PARTY CONGRESS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REPORT of the CENTRAL COMMITTEE of the COMMUNIST PARTY of the SOVIET UNION to the 20Th PARTY CONGRESS N. S. KHRUSHCHOV REPORT OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE SOVIET UNION TO THE 20th PARTY CONGRESS FOREIGN LANGUAGES PUBLISHING HOUSE Moscow 1956 OI^Z3 £- N. S. KHRUSHCHOV REPORT OF THE CENTRAL COMMITTEE OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE SOVIET UNION TO THE 20th PARTY CONGRESS February 14, 1956 FOREIGN LANGUAGES PUBLISHING HOUSE Moscow 1956 CONTENTS I. THE INTERNATIONAL POSITION OF THE SOVIET UNION............................................................................... 8 1. The Steady Economic Advance in the U.S.S.R. and the People’s Democracies............................. 9 2. The Economic Situation in the Capitalist Countries and the Further Aggravation of the Contradictions of Capitalism...............................................................13 3. The Imperialist Policy of Lining Up Aggressive Blocs and Fanning the “Cold War.” The Struggle of the Peoples for Relaxation of International Tension . 21 4. Disintegration of the Imperialist Colonial System 25 5. The Soviet Union in the Struggle for the Consolida­ tion of Peace and International Security................30 6. Some Fundamental Questions of Present-Day Inter­ national Development................................................ 38 II. THE INTERNAL SITUATION OF THE U.S.S.R. 48 INDUSTRY AND TRANSPORT ...................................... 48 1. The Basic Results of the Fifth Five-Year Plan in Industry.........................................................................48 2. Speeding up Technical Progress in Industry ... 53 3. Improvement of Transport and Telecommunication Equipment ............................................................... 56 4. Proper Distribution of Productive Forces....................59 5. Productivity of Labour, Cost of Industrial Produc­ tion, and Capital Construction................................. 61 AGRICULTURE............................ 63 1. Grain Farming—Foundation of All Agriculture . 65 2. The Tasks of Further Advancing Livestock Farming 70 3. Mechanization of Agriculture , , , , ... ..................75 6 k. Development of State Farms......................................... 78 5. Seed Production—an Important Element in the Progress of Agriculture.............................................79 6. Construction in the Collective Farms......................80 7. For Better Guidance of Agriculture.......................... 83 THE RISE IN THE MATERIAL AND CULTURAL STANDARDS OF THE SOVIET PEOPLE............................................................. 85 1. Fuller Satisfaction of the People’s Growing Material Requirements............................................................... 87 2. Towards a New Flowering of Soviet Culture and Science ........................... 95 FURTHER CONSOLIDATION AND DEVELOPMENT 0® THE SOVIET SOCIAL AND STATE SYSTEM ............................... 102 1. Some Questions of Our National Policy..............103 2. Development of Socialist Democracy. Improvement of the State Apparatus. Strengthening of Soviet Law 108 III. THE PARTY..................................... 117 1. Consolidation of the Communist Party’s Ranks and the Strengthening of Its Leading Role in the Soviet State ......................................................................... 117 2. Party Organizational Work.......................................123 3. Questions of Ideological Work................................... 134 Comrades, the period separating us from the Nineteenth Party Congress is not a very long one—only three years and four months. But the amount of work the Party has done, and the significance of the events that have taken place during this time both at home and abroad make it one of the important periods in the history of the Com­ munist Party of the Soviet Union and its efforts to in­ crease the strength of our country, build a communist society, and ensure world peace. In home policy, they were years during which the Party, guided by the interests of the whole people, made a critical appraisal of the situation in agriculture and in­ dustry, and, on the basis of the successes already achieved, adopted a number of important measures designed to ensure a great advance in the country’s socialist de­ velopment. In so doing it boldly uncovered shortcomings in different fields of economic, governmental, and Party activity, broke down outdated conceptions, resolutely sweeping aside everything that had become outmoded and was hindering our advance. It is now clear to all that the measures adopted by the Party were correct and timely. They ensured steady de­ velopment of the socialist economy and a further rise in the Soviet people’s material and cultural standards. There have also been important developments in world affairs during the period under review. Thanks to the consistent peaceful foreign policy of the socialist coun­ tries the state of international tension, which was fraught with great danger, has been replaced by a certain detente. It was because the Soviet Union and its friends—the People’s Republic of China and the other People’s De­ mocracies—promptly took a number of successive dip­ 7 lomatic steps supported by all peace-loving forces that real prospects for improvement opened up in the interna­ tional arena. All this shows that our Party takes due account of the urgent needs of both home and foreign policy and pre­ pares prompt measures appropriate to these needs. This clearly indicates our Party’s close and unbreakable ties with the people, the wisdom of its Leninist collective leadership, and the all-conquering power of the Marxist- Leninist teaching upon which it bases its activity. Throughout these years the Party has held high the great banner of the immortal Lenin. Fidelity to Leninism is the source of all the successes of our Party. {Stormy applause.) Let us now examine our country’s international position and its internal situation during the period under review. I THE INTERNATIONAL POSITION OF THE SOVIET UNION The emergence of socialism from within the bounds of a single country and its transformation into a world sys­ tem is the main feature of our era. Capitalism has proved powerless to prevent this process of world-historic signif­ icance. The simultaneous existence of two opposite world economic systems, the capitalist and the socialist, devel­ oping according to different laws and in opposite direc­ tions, has become an indisputable fact. Socialist economy is developing towards the ever-in­ creasing satisfaction of the material and cultural require­ ments of all members of society, the continuous expan­ sion and improvement of production on the basis of high­ er techniques, and closer co-operation and mutual assist­ ance between the socialist countries. The trend of capitalist economy is that of the ever- increasing enrichment of the monopolies, the further intensification of exploitation and cuts in the living stand­ ards of millions of working people, particularly in the colonial and dependent countries, of increased militari­ st zation of the economy, the exacerbation of the competitive struggle among the capitalist countries, and the maturing of new economic crises and upheavals. 1. THE STEADY ECONOMIC ADVANCE IN THE U.S.S.R. AND THE PEOPLE’S DEMOCRACIES The period under review was marked by a great expansion in the national economy of the U.S.S.R. and also in that of the People’s Republic of China, the Polish People’s Republic, the Czechoslovak Republic, the Hungarian People’s Republic, the Rumanian People’s Republic, the People’s Republic of Bulgaria, the People’s Republic of Albania, the German Democratic Republic, the Korean People’s Democratic Republic, the Mongolian People’s Republic, and the Democratic Republic of Viet-Nam. The rates at which industrial output has increased in the Soviet Union and in capitalist countries from 1929 to 1955 can be seen from the following table: Volume of Industrial Output in U.S.S.R. and Capitalist Countries (1929=100) 1929 1937 1943 194 6 1949 1950 1952 1955 U.S.S.R. 100 429 573 466 870 1,082 1,421 2,049 All capitalist countries . 100 104 — 107 130 148 164 193 Of which: United States . 100 103 215 153 164 190 210 234 Great Britain . 100 124 118 144 153 153 181 B1E France .... 100 82 63 92 92 108 125 Italy ............... 100 99 72 108 124 148 194 Western Ger fcg. many . 100 114 35 93 117 150 213 Japan............... 100 169 *231 51 101 115 173 239 * Data for 1944. These stat istics show that in a quarter of a century, or, to be more exact, in 26 years, the Soviet Union increased its industrial output more than 20-fold, despite the tre­ mendous damage done to its national economy by the war. Meanwhile, the United States, which enjoyed excep­ tionally favourable conditions, was able to do little more than double its production, while industry in the capital­ ist world as a whole failed to register even that growth. The People’s Democracies have also considerably sur­ passed the capitalist countries in rate of growth of indus­ trial production. Last year the pre-war level of industrial output was exceeded in Poland more than four times, in Bulgaria more than five times, in Czechoslovakia more than two times, in Hungary three and a half times, in Ru­ mania almost three times, in Albania more than 11 times, and in the German Democratic Republic more than two times. The People’s Republic of China, which began to build socialism later than the others, has made outstanding progress: its industrial output is more than double the pre­ war maximum and more than four times the 1949 figure. Much has also been achieved
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Defence of the Latvian Language Against Russification. Documents from 1944-1989
    the Jānis Riekstiņš of Language Defence In Latvian Against Russification Jānis Riekstiņš In Defence of the Latvian Language Against Russification Jānis Riekstiņš In Defence of the Latvian Language Against Russification The Latvian Language Agency Jānis Riekstiņš In Defence of the Latvian Language Against Russification Riga Latviešu valodas aģentūra / The Latvian Language Agency 2012 UDK 811.174’ 272(474.3)(093) De 167 Jānis Riekstiņš In Defence of the Latvian Language Against Russification 1944–1989 Documents In Defence of the Latvian Language Against Russification. 1944–1989. Documents. Compiled and translated from the Russian by J. Riekstiņš. Introduction by Prof. Uldis Ozoliņš, foreword by J. Riekstiņš. Managing editor D. Liepa. Riga: LVA, 2012. 160 pages. Managing editor Dr. Dite Liepa Literary editor P. Cedriņš Reviewer Dr. Dzintra Hirša Documents utilized are from the Latvian State Archive collection of LCP CC records (PA-101. fonds), LCP Central Control and Auditing Committee (PA-2160), the LSSR Council of Ministers (270. fonds), LSSR Supreme Council (290. fonds), the Riga City Executive Committee (1400. fonds), as well as documents from collections of other institutions, that verify the Soviet policies in Latvian SSR. Many of these documents are published for the first time. Cover design and layout: Vanda Voiciša © LVA, 2012 © Jānis Riekstiņš, compiler, translator from the Russian language, foreword author © Uldis Ozoliņš, foreword author © Vanda Voiciša, “Idea lex”, cover design and layout ISBN 978-9984-815-77-0 Table of Contents Introduction: the struggle for the status of the Latvian language during the Soviet occupation 1944 to 1989 ............ 6 Foreword by J. Riekstiņš ........................................18 Section 1 Decisions and materials on the acquisition of the Latvian language .........................21 Section 2 Decisions on learning Russian.
    [Show full text]
  • PERSA Working Paper No. 37
    Planning the Soviet Defense Industry: the Late 1920s and 1930s Andrei Markevich Moscow State University PERSA Working Paper No. 37 Political Department of Economics Economy Research in Soviet Archives Version: 7 November 2004 Available from www.warwick.ac.uk/go/persa. Planning the Soviet Defense Industry: the Late 1920s and 1930s* Andrei Markevich† Open Lyceum, All Russian External Multi-Disciplinary School, Moscow State University Abstract The paper describes the procedures for planning the Soviet defense industry in the interwar period and analyses its limitations. Three features differentiated the planning of the defense industry from that of the civilian economy. First, the supply of national defense in the broadest sense had high priority and received the close attention of the country’s top leadership. Second, the process of military and economic planning for defense that created the context of defense industry plans had a strongly forward-looking character and generated increasing demands through the interwar years. Third, the detailed planning of defense industry was carried on simultaneously in two separate bureaucracies, a military hierarchy preoccupied with formulating demands and an industrial hierarchy the task of which was to organize supply; planners made strenuous efforts to reconcile supplies and demands in the defense industry, and met with limited success. * This paper contributes to research on the political economy of the Soviet Union under Stalin funded by the Hoover Institution (principal investigator, Paul Gregory). † Thanks to Paul Gregory and Mark Harrison for advice and comments; I am responsible for remaining errors. Please address communications to Andrei Markevich care of [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Explaining Political Transformation in the Soviet Union
    Notes 2 Explaining Political Transformation in the Soviet Union 1‘O programme sotsial’nogo razvitiia sela’, Pravda (13 April 1989), 2. 2 Judith Pallot, ‘Rural Depopulation and the Restoration of the Russian Village under Gorbachev’, Soviet Studies, vol. 42, no. 4 (1990), 655–74. 3 Michael Cox, ed., Rethinking the Soviet Collapse: Sovietology, the Death of Communism and the New Russia (London: Pinter, 1998). 4 For a more nuanced account of the literature than space here allows see George Breslauer, ‘In Defense of Sovietology’, Post-Soviet Affairs, vol. 8, no. 3 (1992), 197–238. 5 Carl J. Friedrich and Zbigniew Brzezinski, Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1956) and the 2nd edition, revised by Friedrich (1965); Leonard Schapiro, Totalitarianism (London: Macmillan – now Palgrave Macmillan, 1972); Robert Borrowes, ‘Totalitarianism: the Revised Standard Version’, World Politics, XXI, no. 2 ( January 1969), 272–94; Carl. J. Friedrich, Michael Curtis, and Benjamin J. Barber, Totalitarianism in Perspective: Three Views (London: Pall Mall Press, 1969). 6 The most eloquent representative of the application of pluralist ideas to the Soviet Union was Jerry Hough with his notion of ‘institutional pluralism’. Jerry Hough, ‘The Soviet System: Petrification or Pluralism’, in The Soviet Union and Social Science Theory (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977). Although Hough later came to disown this term, it received the qualified support of a number of other scholars: Peter Solomon, Soviet Criminologists and Criminal Policy: Specialists in Policy Making (London: Macmillan – now Palgrave Macmillan, 1978) and Stephen Fortescue, The Communist Party and Soviet Science (Basingstoke: Macmillan (now Palgrave Macmillan) in association with the Centre for Russian and East European Studies, University of Birmingham, 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Soviet Military and Related Abbreviations
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY TECHNICAL MANUAL GLOSSARY OF SOVIET MILITARY AND RELATED ABBREVIATIONS DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY FFEBRUARY 1957 TM 30-546 TECHNICAL MANUAL DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY No. 30-546 WASHINGTON 25, D. C., 31 December 1956 GLOSSARY OF SOVIET MILITARY AND RELATED ABBREVIATIONS Page Transliteration table for the Russian language ......................-.. ii Abbreviations for use with this manual .......-.........................- ...... iii Grammatical abbreviations ...----------------------.....- ---- iv Foreword --------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------- 1 Glossary of Soviet military and related abbreviations-.................-......... 3 TRANSLITERATION TABLE FOR THE RUSSIAN LANGUAGE The Russian alphabet has 33 letters, which are here listed together w [th their transliteration as adopted by the Board on Geographic Names. A a AG a P pd C °c C B B 3 e T T cAl/ r rJCT y A D d B cSe ye,et X xZ "s ts ch )K3J G "0 sh 314 C ' shch b b hi bi 'b *i, H H KG 10 10j Oo (90 51 31 1L / p ye initially, after vowel. andl after 'b, b; e e1~ewhere. When written as a in Rusoian, transliterate a5~ yii or e. Use of diacritical marks is. preferred, but such marks may be omitted when expediency (apostrophe), palatalize. a preceding consonant, giving a sound resembling the consonant plus y!, somewhat as in English meet you, did you. 3The symbol " (double apostrophel, not a repetition of the line above. No sound; used only after certain prefixe.- before the vowvel letter: c. e. 91. 10. ii ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS
    [Show full text]
  • Collecting Agricultural Statistics in the Soviet Union: Report of Forecasting Project
    COLLECTING AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS IN THE SOVIET UNION: REPORT OF FORECASTING PROJECT. USDA/FAER-112 US-USSR AGREEIlENT ON COOPERATION IN THE FIELD OF AGRICULTURE. (Foreign Agricultural Economic Report). / Fletcher Pope, "Jr. Washington, DC: Economio, Research Service:. Nov. 19'75. (NAl:: Call No. A281.91Ag8F) 2 8 2 5 I .0 :~ 11111 . \\\\1 . ~ W IIF2 2.2 IIIII ~ == I.. I~ w 40 I Il.i 1 .0 I~ ~~~- IIII1_ 1.8 \\\\\1.25 111111.4 \\\\\1.6 ' ! IiI' !\ 11 d\' Collecting I Agricultural Statistics in the Soviet Union Report of Forecasting Project US-USSR Agreement on Cooperation in the Field of Agriculture Economic Research Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Foreign Agricultural Economic Report No. 112 \~ I} COLLECTING AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS IN THE SOVIET UNION, Report of Forecasting Project, US-USSR Agreement on Cooperation in the Field of Agriculture. By Fletcher Pope, Jr., Foreign Demand and Competition Division, Economic Research Service. Foreign Agricul­ tural Report No. 112. ABSTRACT The Central Statisti<::al Administration has primary I responsibility for colleccing and processing Soviet data, I including agricultural data. All collective and state I farms must provide required data according to a central, uniform plan. These data are used mainly by Soviet offi­ 1 cials to evaluate progress in meeting planned goals. The .~ recent change in grain import policy has greatly increased 1 the need for Soviet officials to know about crop prospects 1 during the growing season. Currently, work is underway in I qeveloping crop forecasting models. KEY WORDS: Soviet Union, agriculture, statistics, fore­ casting. o /Q / & I (\I ~)• Washington, D.C. 20250 November 1975 J '< b ~ ; r I IIr\ PREFACE I' " ! "!.
    [Show full text]
  • FULFILMENT of the U.S.S.R. STATE PLAN for 1949 Communique of the Central Statistical Administration of the U.S.S.R
    ~--·---·- - ------------------------- I "SOVIET NEWS" BOOKLETS SEVENTIETH BIRTHDAY OF J. V. STALIN, Pravda Articles by G. M. Malenkov, V. M. Molotov, L. P. Beria, K. V. Voroshilov, A. I. Mikoyan ... 3d. FULFILMENT ON THE SURE ROAD TO GREAT VICTORIES (Report on ll I the 32nd Anniversary of the Great October Socialist Revo­ lution) by G. M. Malenkov ... ld. AGAINST PREPARATIONS FOR A NEW WAR-FOR A ~ FIVE-POWER PEACE PACT (Speech at United Nations of the U.S.S.R. Political Committee on November 16, 1949) by A. Y. Vyshinsky ... ... ... ... ... .. .. 3d. SOVIET GOVERNMENT ON THE NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ld. THE U.S.S.R. ON GUARD OVER THE PEACE AND STATE PLAN SECURITY OF THE NATIONS, by A. Y. Vyshinsky ... ld. NEW U.S.S.R. PROPOSALS ON DISARMAMENT (Malik's Speech at Security Council, February, 1949) ld. SOCIAL INSURANCE IN THE U.S.S.R., by Z. Mokhov ... ld. STALIN'S POLICY OF PEACE AND DEMOCRACY 2d. For 1949 FOR A DEMOCRATIC PEACE WITH GERMANY. Speeches at London Session of Council of Foreign Ministers ; by V. M. Molotov, 1947 ... 2d. MOLOTOV'S SPEECHES AT PARIS CONFERENCE, 1946 2d. MOLOTOV'S SPEECHES AT NEW YORK SESSION OF U.N.O. GENERAL ASSEMBLY, 1946 2d. MOLOTOV'S SPEECHES AT MOSCOW SESSION OF COUNCIL OF FOREIGN MINISTERS, 1947 2d, BAN ATOMIC BOMB AND REDUCE ARMAMENTS, by A. Y. Vyshinsky 2d. LEGAL RIGHTS OF THE SOVIET FAMILY, by G. M. Sverdlov ... 2d. U.S.S.R. AND MARSHALL'S PROPOSALS (Molotov's Statements) 3d. SOVIET-AMERICAN RELATIONS 3d. FIVE-YEAR PLAN FOR 1946-1950 ... ls.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial Revolution in Ethiopia: 15 Years on
    Editorial Revolution in Ethiopia: 15 Years on .. As it rounds off its fifteenth year, the revolution in Ethiopia appears to have completed a distinct phase with the institutionalisation of the regime that came to power in 1974. Military rule has been supplemented, though not supplanted, with the Workers' Party of Ethiopia (WPE), founded in 1984, whose prescribed role is to be 'the guiding force of the state and the entire society'. The state itself, renamed the People's Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, was given a constitution in 1987, in which the dominant role of the Party is enshrined. Considerable care and time were given to fashioning these institutions, and much effort expended in mobilising popular involvement in the process. The obvious intention was to draw the curtain on the previous phase, marked by military rule, lawlessness and violence, and to usher in a period of 'socialist construction' under the aegis of the WPE. Christopher Clapham completed a study of Ethiopia just as the process of institutionalisation neared its end (Transformation and Continuity in Revolutionary Ethiopia). It is the first detailed study of the regime, and his article in this issue offers a concise description of it, as well as his assessment of its strengths and weaknessnes. While he gives little credit to the regime's Marxist ideological assertions, viewing them essentially as instrumental to the purpose of mass mobilisation and organisation, he is impressed with the strength and organisational capacity of the state, which has been able to make its authority felt directly at the base of society — though not everywhere in the country — for the first time in Ethiopian history.
    [Show full text]
  • July 03, 1956 Memo Concerning the Azerbaijani Democratic Party and the Situation of Political Immigrants from Iran Living in the Azerbaijan SSR
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified July 03, 1956 Memo Concerning the Azerbaijani Democratic Party and the Situation of Political Immigrants from Iran Living in the Azerbaijan SSR Citation: “Memo Concerning the Azerbaijani Democratic Party and the Situation of Political Immigrants from Iran Living in the Azerbaijan SSR,” July 03, 1956, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, GAPPOD, f.1, op.89, d.203. Obtained for CWIHP by Jamil Hasanli and translated for CWIHP by Gary Goldberg. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/120512 Summary: A memo concerning the Azerbaijani Democratic Party and the situation of political immigrants from Iran living in the Azerbaijan SSR. It also contains proposals for CC CPSU to improve the situation. Original Language: Russian Contents: English Translation Scan of Original Document Top Secret CC CPSU Memorandum Concerning the Azerbaijani Democratic Party and the Situation of Political Immigrants from Iran Living in the Azerbaijan SSR I. The Azerbaijani Democratic Party has existed as an independent political organization since 1945. It was founded in accordance with a Decree of the CC VKP(b) Politburo of 6 July 1945 “Measures to Organize a Separatist Movement in Southern Azerbaijan and Other Provinces of Northern Iran”. On 3 September 1945 an initiative group in the city of Tabriz headed by S. D. Pishevari published an appeal laying out the goals and tasks of the Azerbaijani Democratic Party being created. The appeal contained a demand to give Southern Azerbaijan, occupying a territory of about 150,000 square kilometers and containing 5 million people, autonomy within the Iranian state in the area of self-government with formation of district and provincial enjumens, creation of conditions for development of a national culture, recognition of the Azerbaijani language as an official language for both state and cultural institutions of Azerbaijan, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • ARAL: the History of Dying Sea
    International Fund for Saving the Aral Sea Executive Committee ARAL: the history of dying sea Dushanbe - 2003 U. ASHIRBEKOV, I. ZONN To 10-th anniversary of IFAS and Dushanbe Iternational Forum of fresh water ARAL: THE HISTORY OF DYING SEA Dushanbe - 2003 ÁÁÊ 26.3+26.82+28.081+2689(2) À - 98 Ashirbekov U.A., Zonn I.S. Aral: The History of Dying Sea. Dushanbe, 2003.-86 ñ. This book gives a brief description of the Aral sea till 1960 when the sea started dying out. For the first time it presents the chronology of studying, development and attempts of conservation and reha-bilitation of the Aral sea. Shown is the participation of the world society in cooperation related to envi-ronmental catastrophe. © Ashirbekov U.A., Zonn I.S. It is issued by the decision of IFAS Executive Committee. Under the general edition of Aslov S.M. - Chairman of IFAS Executive Committee Composer: Gaybullaev H.G. Editor: Jamshedov P. The edition is carried out by the financial support of the «Natural Resource Management» Project (NRMP) and the USA Agency on International Development (USAID) «Who does not have past, that does not have future» Popular wisdom INTRODUCTION For the last decades the problem of Aral doesn't come off the pages of mass media. New works appear refreshing new aspects of "life" of drying sea, it's actively discussed on national and international levels. Ten years ago five new independent states of central Asia - Kazakh Republic, Kyrgyz Republic, Republic of Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Republic of Uzbekistan united its efforts for creation of Interstate Coordination Water Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright British Foreign Office Russia Correspondence Guide To
    %ULWLVK)RUHLJQ2IILFH5XVVLDFRUUHVSRQGHQFHJXLGHWRWKHVFKRODUO\ UHVRXUFHVPLFURILOPHGLWLRQRIWKH3XEOLF5HFRUG2IILFH&ROOHFWLRQ %G>@ :LOPLQJWRQ'HO XUQQEQGHEYEEVE 'LH3')'DWHLNDQQHOHNWURQLVFKGXUFKVXFKWZHUGHQ Copyright Das Copyright für alle Webdokumente, insbesondere für Bil- The Bayerische Staatsbibliothek (BSB) owns the copyright for der, liegt bei der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek. Eine Folge- all web documents, in particular for all images. Any further use verwertung von Webdokumenten ist nur mit Zustimmung der of the web documents is subject to the approval of the Baye- Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek bzw. des Autors möglich. Exter- rische Staatsbibliothek and/or the author. External links to the ne Links auf die Angebote sind ausdrücklich erwünscht. Eine offer of the BSB are expressly welcome. However, it is illegal unautorisierte Übernahme ganzer Seiten oder ganzer Beiträge to copy whole pages or complete articles or parts of articles oder Beitragsteile ist dagegen nicht zulässig. Für nicht-kom- without prior authorisation. Some individual materials may be merzielle Ausbildungszwecke können einzelne Materialien ko- copied for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that piert werden, solange eindeutig die Urheberschaft der Autoren the authorship of the author(s) or of the Bayerische Staatsbibli- bzw. der Bayerischen Staatsbibliothek kenntlich gemacht wird. othek is indicated unambiguously. Eine Verwertung von urheberrechtlich geschützten Beiträgen Unless provided otherwise by the copyright law, it is illegal and und Abbildungen der auf
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Soviet Bloc 1945-1991
    THE HISTORY OF THE SOVIET BLOC 1945-1991 A Chronology PART I 1945-1952 EDITED BY Csaba Békés Cold War History ResEarch CEntEr Budapest 2012 THE HISTORY OF THE SOVIET BLOC 1945-1991 A Chronology PART I 1945-1952 EDITED BY Csaba Békés Assistant Editors David CATALAN, Neala HICKEY, Jasper NOOIJN, Emese NYITRAI, Levente NYITRAI, Bobbie SCHOEMAKER, Kristóf ZSIDI Contributors Diego BENEDETTI, Martyna BOJARSKA, Shira BORZAK, Lauren CRYSTAL, Botond CSELLE, Sonya COWELL, Péter János DARÁK, Nico DEGENKOLB, Kati DEPETRILLO, Doris DOMOSZLAI, Jacob FEYGIN, Lilla FÖRDŐS, Katarina GABIKOVA, Kristína GABIKOVA, Zsófia GÖDE, Gyöngyi GYARMATI, Ágnes HEVÉR, Zoltán HERKUTZ, Emily Jennifer HOLLAND, Connie IP, Alin IVASCU, Dean JOLLY, Annastiina KALLIUS, János KEMÉNY, András KISS, Annamária KÓTAY-NAGY, Réka KRIZMANICS, Andrej KROKOS, András Máté LÁZÁR, Zardas LEE, Karina LEGRADI, Tara LOTSTEIN, Cynthia MANCHA, Viktor NAGY, Jennifer OTTERSON, Linda RICHTER, Zita Bettina VASAS, Dániel VÉKONY, Péter VUKMAN, Patrick Stephen WAGER, Jonathon WOODRUFF Technical Assistance Lotta BADENHEUER, Petra LESKANICH Cold War History Research Center Budapest 2012 ISBN 978-963-12-7938-2 © Cold War History Research Center, 2012 Contents 1945 January ................................................................................................................................................. 1 February ............................................................................................................................................... 4 March ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the originalor copy sut>mitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter ftice, while others may t)e from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy subm itted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will t>e noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to t>e removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have t>een reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6" x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell & Howell Information ar>d Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor. Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 UMI’ CHILDREN OF SOVIET VICTORY, FOUNDERS OF THE RUSSIAN FUTURE: YOUNG SOVIET SPECIALISTS AND THE EVOLUTION OF RUSSIAN SOCIETY, 1965-1982 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By David L.
    [Show full text]