DOCSLIB.ORG

Scheben on Bregman, 'Israel's Wars: a History Since 1947'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scheben on Bregman, 'Israel's Wars: a History Since 1947' H-Levant Scheben on Bregman, 'Israel's Wars: A History since 1947' Review published on Saturday, March 1, 2003 Ahron Bregman. Israel's Wars: A History since 1947. Second edition. London and New York: Routledge, 2002. 272 pp. $23.95 (paper), ISBN 978-0-415-28716-6; $100.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-415-28715-9. Reviewed by Thomas Scheben (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)Published on H-Levant (March, 2003) Israel At War Israel At War Starting a book review with a critique of its title may seem a little bit extreme. However,Israel's Wars might better have been titled Israel at War. As the author states explicitly, he did not write a military history because it lacks a view of both sides of the hill. His focus is clearly on the Israeli side. The Arab side of the story is brought in whenever it is necessary to understand Israeli actions. Moreover, it is not primarily a military history in the classical sense. Battlefield moves and countermoves are summarized only very briefly. Just two pages and a sketch are spent on the description of the ten-odd days of the Battle for the Golan in 1973. Roughly the same amount of space is dedicated to the see-saw battles in the Sinai, the largest tank battles the world had seen so far. After this cursory review of a battle of that length and magnitude, the first-time reader is left with ideas, questions, and the desire to learn more about this topic. Because this happens more than once in the course of reading the book, the study does an excellent job in accomplishing what any introductory work should achieve. By attracting and luring his reader into the topic, laying out food for thought along with questions, and emphasizing crucial spots and crossroads, he entices the reader to dig deeper. The select bibliography is a useful springboard for further reading. The full story of the Arab-Israeli tragedy has often been told, and need not be repeated here. The reviewer deems it more important to discuss how the story is told and which perspective has been used. The emphasis of Bregman's book clearly is on the history of Israel as a society at war. Thus, as he points out in his conclusion, "Israeli-Arab wars can be seen, in a historical perspective, as a single war with a single continuity" (p. 238). Unrolling a truly complicated Oriental carpet, the author has chosen a chronological approach. He starts with the 1948 War of Independence and ends with the ongoing Al-Aqsa Intifada, which began in September 2000, raging on when the book went to the printers, as it still does. Ending with the view of a still-undecided conflict fits into Bregman's thesis that Israel is a society at war and was even before the beginning of statehood. This is the book's primary focus and Bregman is careful to identify the decisive moments and crossroads. Reaching such points, he arrests the flow of his straightforward narrative to go into greater detail. The way he characterizes persons and sketches situations with a few candid pen strokes is a pleasure to read and even more pleasurable to re-think. Not wasting space with diplomatic phrases, his judgement is direct and to the point. Dayan Citation: H-Net Reviews. Scheben on Bregman, 'Israel's Wars: A History since 1947'. H-Levant. 01-22-2014. https://networks.h-net.org/node/7801/reviews/8234/scheben-bregman-israels-wars-history-1947 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Levant is featured as a sharp-eyed, far-sighted personality, but lacking the necessary vigor to impose his will on the Meir cabinet (pp. 90, 93, 105). In the early seventies, Egypt's Anwar al-Sadat clearly held the initiative, contrasting strongly with the immobility of the Israeli leadership. Thwarting all Sadat's political initiatives, the Meir administration all but led him to the only way out of the Arab-Israeli stalemate. No choice was left save a new, but limited war. Unintentionally paving the way to the October War, Israel's political and military top brass blundered into an armed conflict, for which neither was really prepared and which, according to Bregman, was as avoidable as it was unnecessary (pp. 102-108). A decade later, Minister of Defence Ariel Sharon's deceptive moves to turn Israel's punitive invasion of southern Lebanon 1982 into the siege of Beirut are described as being close to outright treason (p. 162). The dark picture he paints of this shrewd warrior and unscrupulous politician sheds a light on a political system, in which a man like Sharon not only could resume his political career after a while, but even be elected Prime Minister. Even darker are the shadows cast over "the only democracy in the Middle East" when it comes to dealing with its enemies. Dating back into the forties, well before the establishment of the state, Israel has "pursued a policy of political assassination." "Pinpointing" or "neutralizing" dangerous individuals are the euphemistic expressions for the targeted killing of forty Palestinians in the first year of Intifada II (pp. 219 ff). One event is singled out for broader treatment, not only because of its significance for understanding the conflict. The author provides new documentary evidence that the attack on the U.S. spy ship Liberty, off the Sinai coast on June 8, 1967, was not a case of misidentification; instead, the air control knew positively that it was attacking a vessel of its most important ally. The overall treatment of the successive events is uneven, providing a more detailed account as the narrative approaches recent events. While only a few pages cover the sweeping battles in 1967 and 1973, the tit-for-tat of Palestinian suicide attacks and Israeli retaliation in the Second Intifada are described with specific dates as well as the names of the attackers and their victims. Pushing the narrative of a history book into ongoing events is a daring endeavor. The Tenet Plan, which Bregman discusses in all its elaborate details--depicting it as the ultimate blueprint for an end to the turmoil in the occupied territories--has since joined the grand assembly of failed Mid-East Peace Plans. Bregman argues that this conflict has not yet seen a clear victor on the battlefields, but that so far Israel has won the "war of words," or the battle over public opinion, at least where it matters (p. 239). Putting society rather than armed forces into the focus of his observations, however, requires that other dimensions be taken into account. Be it social or economic development; the level of education, science, and technology; or the quality and efficiency of leadership and political system, Israel is far ahead of its Arab neighbors. Adding these dimensions, one comes to the conclusion that an occasional stand-off, or even defeats on the battlefield, are only temporary set-backs with the overall outcome never in doubt. If there is any leitmotif in this book, it is the question regarding how the Israeli society's political orientation has been influenced by the constant stress of conflict and imminent war and, in turn, how this has shaped the decision making of Israel's security policy. We know today that Israel's mere existence was never really at stake after the 1948 war. At that time, the threat to the very existence of the Jewish community in Palestine was real, and subsequent years of Arab infiltration created the Citation: H-Net Reviews. Scheben on Bregman, 'Israel's Wars: A History since 1947'. H-Levant. 01-22-2014. https://networks.h-net.org/node/7801/reviews/8234/scheben-bregman-israels-wars-history-1947 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-Levant perception of an ongoing fight for survival. This was not supported by the relatively low number of Israeli casualties, probably fewer than those caused by road accidents (pp. 49 f). However, the bloodthirsty Arab propaganda helped to create the notion that the opposite was true, and that the physical annihilation of the last Jew on Palestinian soil was the ultima ratio of all Arab policy. The Israeli leadership profited heavily from such murderous Arab rhetoric. It closed the ranks, instilled social discipline, and made the society accept the necessity of spending more than a third of the budget on arms. Moreover, they went to war without any resistance whenever the long roll was beaten. Bregman is suspicious that the Israel government deliberately echoed, and thus reinforced, notions of Arab hatred to rally the people behind it, although he frankly admits this suspicion cannot be proven with the available sources. The memory of the Holocaust, a strong stimulant in the early wars, is fading, but still kept alive to serve the same purpose. Bregman observes that Israeli society's reaction to real and perceived threats bears a political message to the Arab side. The more or less unconditional national solidarity and the readiness to rally around the flag whenever the government called the nation to arms lasted unto the invasion of Lebanon in 1982 and the subsequent siege of Beirut with the massacres of Sabra and Shatila. This solidarity declined during the First Intifada and dipped again since its renewal in September 2000. Although the author argues this point in the preface, he states almost the opposite in the concluding chapter about the Al-Aqsa-Intifada (pp. xv, 236). The contradiction is obviously a result of developments in the very early phase of the Second Intifada, when many people on Israel's left still believed in a chance for the Peace Process and were outraged over Sharon's provocative visit to the Temple Mountain.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Unusual Revolution: the Palestinian Thawra in Lebanon, C
    Durham Middle East Papers AN UNUSuaL REVOLUTION: THE PALESTINIAN THAWra IN LEBANON, C. 1969-82 Dr Anne Irfan Durham Middle East Paper No. 103 Durham Middle East Papers Institute for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies Institute for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies Durham University Al-Qasimi Building Elvet Hill Road Durham AN UNUSuaL REVOLUTION: Durham Middle East Papers No. 103 DH1 3TU ISSN 1476-4830 THE PALESTINIAN THAWra IN LEBANON, C. 1969-82 Tel: +44 (0)191 3345680 September 2020 The Durham Middle East Papers series covers all aspects of the economy, politics, social science, history, literature and languages of the Middle East. Authors are invited to submit papers to the Editorial Board for consideration for publication. Dr Anne Irfan The views expressed in this paper are the author(s) alone and do not necessarily reflect those of the publisher or IMEIS. All Rights Reserved. This paper cannot be photocopied or reproduced without prior permission. Durham Middle East Paper No. 103 © Dr Anne Irfan and Durham University, 2020 About The Institute Editorial Board The Institute for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (IMEIS), within the Professor Anoush Ehteshami Dr Colin Turner School of Government & International Affairs, is a Social Science-focused Exofficio member Reader in Islamic Thought in academic institute of excellence, research-led in ethos, with a track-record of Professor of International Relations the School of Government and internationally acclaimed research outputs across all sub-areas of its activity. in the School of
    [Show full text]
  • Syria a Revolution, a Conspiracy Or a Civil
    Foreign debts, reforms and the change of the social pact in the Arab World The Making of the Washington Consensus in the Middle East and North Africa. Negotiating international assets, debts and power (1979-91) University of Bologna, October 10-11, 2018 Samir AITA President, Cercle des Economistes Arabes The 1980’s and the Arab countries • What really characterizes this decade comparatively to others? • Did this decade really changed the Arab countries and rooted the “Arab Spring”? • How internal social, economic and political issues interacted with world environment? • Is it all about oil? Or about development paradigms? The 1980’s and the Arab countries • Why a crisis of foreign debts in the 1980’s? The 1980’s and the Arab countries • What were the causes and the consequences of inflation? Political and social issues 1950’s-1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s Internal politics • Political instability • Stability • Extreme stability • Extreme stability Regional politics • Comptetition • Cohesive • Extreme divisions • Cohesive • Wars Ideology • Anti-colonial • Arabism • « Me first » • Islamism • Arabism • Palestine less • Islamism • Palestine less • Modernism/reactio central • Palestine not central central nary • Democracy? • War on • Democracy? • Palestine Central « communism » (Afghanistan) • Democracy? Elites • Urban elites • Rural, tribal • ‘Asabiyah • Extremely • Urban ➔Rural, ‘Asabiyah & • Extremely authoritarian tribal elites clientelism authoritarian • ‘Asabiyah • Authoritarian • Clientelism weakening • What’s next? Society • Rural-urban
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Experience in Lebanon, 1982-1985
    THE ISRAELI EXPERIENCE IN LEBANON, 1982-1985 Major George C. Solley Marine Corps Command and Staff College Marine Corps Development and Education Command Quantico, Virginia 10 May 1987 ABSTRACT Author: Solley, George C., Major, USMC Title: Israel's Lebanon War, 1982-1985 Date: 16 February 1987 On 6 June 1982, the armed forces of Israel invaded Lebanon in a campaign which, although initially perceived as limited in purpose, scope, and duration, would become the longest and most controversial military action in Israel's history. Operation Peace for Galilee was launched to meet five national strategy goals: (1) eliminate the PLO threat to Israel's northern border; (2) destroy the PLO infrastructure in Lebanon; (3) remove Syrian military presence in the Bekaa Valley and reduce its influence in Lebanon; (4) create a stable Lebanese government; and (5) therefore strengthen Israel's position in the West Bank. This study examines Israel's experience in Lebanon from the growth of a significant PLO threat during the 1970's to the present, concentrating on the events from the initial Israeli invasion in June 1982 to the completion of the withdrawal in June 1985. In doing so, the study pays particular attention to three aspects of the war: military operations, strategic goals, and overall results. The examination of the Lebanon War lends itself to division into three parts. Part One recounts the background necessary for an understanding of the war's context -- the growth of PLO power in Lebanon, the internal power struggle in Lebanon during the long and continuing civil war, and Israeli involvement in Lebanon prior to 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Amending the Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty
    The Atkin Paper Series Saving peace: The case for amending the Egypt-Israel peace treaty Dareen Khalifa, ICSR Atkin Fellow February 2013 About the Atkin Paper Series Thanks to the generosity of the Atkin Foundation, the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence (ICSR) offers young leaders from Israel and the Arab world the opportunity to come to London for a period of four months. The purpose of the fellowship is to provide young leaders from Israel and the Arab world with an opportunity to develop their ideas on how to further peace and understanding in the Middle East through research, debate and constructive dialogue in a neutral political environment. The end result is a policy paper that will provide a deeper understanding and a new perspective on a specific topic or event. Author Dareen holds an MA in Human Rights from University College London, and a BA in Political Science from Cairo University. She has been working as a consultant for Amnesty International in London. In Egypt she worked on human rights education and advocacy with the National Council for Human Rights, in addition to a number of nongovernmental human rights organisations. Dareen has also worked as a freelance researcher and as a consultant for a number of civil society organisations and think tanks in Egypt.Additionally, Dareen worked as a Fellow at Human Rights First, Washington DC. She has contributed to several human rights reports, The Global Integrity Anti-Corruption report on Egypt, For a Nation without Torture, and the Verité International Annual Report on Labour Rights in Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • “Just War” Case Study: Israeli Invasion of Lebanon
    “Just War” Case Study: Israeli Invasion Of Lebanon CSC 2002 Subject Area History EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Title: “JUST WAR” CASE STUDY: ISRAELI INVASION OF LEBANON. Author: Major Christopher A. Arantz, U.S. Marine Corps Thesis: This essay examines Israel’s overall reasons for invasion of southern Lebanon, and compares them to just war theory’s war-decision law and war-conduct law. This examination will establish that Israel achieved her objectives before war termination, which lead to some unjust actions. Discussion: Between 1948 and 1982 Israel had engaged in conventional combat four times against Arab coalition forces. In all cases, Israel fought for survival of its state and established a military dominance in the region. In the years leading up to 1982, the Israeli government sought ways to eliminate security problems in its occupied territory and across its border with southern Lebanon. Israel defined its security problems as terrorist excursions that threatened the security of its people and property in northern Israel. This paper will examine Israeli conduct of deciding to go to war and their conduct of war in relation to just war theory. Three areas will be examined; 1) Did Israel have a just cause, use a legitimate authority and the right intention for invading Lebanon as in accordance with Jus ad Bellum? 2) Did Israel conduct the conflict in accordance with Jus in Bello? 3) What are the long-term ramifications for the region since the invasion? Conclusion: 1. War does not have to be just, but it clearly helps the overall outcome when world opinion believes a war is being conducted for just reasons, and clearly outlined.
    [Show full text]
  • Camp David's Shadow
    Camp David’s Shadow: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinian Question, 1977-1993 Seth Anziska Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2015 © 2015 Seth Anziska All rights reserved ABSTRACT Camp David’s Shadow: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinian Question, 1977-1993 Seth Anziska This dissertation examines the emergence of the 1978 Camp David Accords and the consequences for Israel, the Palestinians, and the wider Middle East. Utilizing archival sources and oral history interviews from across Israel, Palestine, Lebanon, the United States, and the United Kingdom, Camp David’s Shadow recasts the early history of the peace process. It explains how a comprehensive settlement to the Arab-Israeli conflict with provisions for a resolution of the Palestinian question gave way to the facilitation of bilateral peace between Egypt and Israel. As recently declassified sources reveal, the completion of the Camp David Accords—via intensive American efforts— actually enabled Israeli expansion across the Green Line, undermining the possibility of Palestinian sovereignty in the occupied territories. By examining how both the concept and diplomatic practice of autonomy were utilized to address the Palestinian question, and the implications of the subsequent Israeli and U.S. military intervention in Lebanon, the dissertation explains how and why the Camp David process and its aftermath adversely shaped the prospects of a negotiated settlement between Israelis and Palestinians in the 1990s. In linking the developments of the late 1970s and 1980s with the Madrid Conference and Oslo Accords in the decade that followed, the dissertation charts the role played by American, Middle Eastern, international, and domestic actors in curtailing the possibility of Palestinian self-determination.
    [Show full text]
  • The Promise and Failure of the Zionist-Maronite Relationship, 1920-1948
    The Promise and Failure of the Zionist-Maronite Relationship, 1920-1948 Master’s Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Department of Near Eastern and Judaic Studies Ilan Troen, Graduate Advisor In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Master’s Degree by Scott Abramson February 2012 Acknowledgements I cannot omit the expression of my deepest gratitude to my defense committee, the formidable triumvirate of Professors Troen, Makiya, and Salameh. To register my admiration for these scholars would be to court extravagance (and deplete a printer cartridge), so I shall have to limit myself to this brief tribute of heartfelt thanks. ii ABSTRACT The Promise and Failure of the Zionist-Maronite Relationship, 1920-1948 A thesis presented to the Department of Near Eastern and Judaic Studies Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Brandeis University Waltham, Massachusetts By Scott Abramson Much of the historiography on the intercourse between Palestinian Jews and Lebanese Maronites concerns only the two peoples’ relations in the seventies and eighties. This thesis, in contrast, attempts a departure from this scholarship, joining the handful of other works that chart the history of the Zionist-Maronite relationship in its earliest incarnation. From its inception to its abeyance beginning in 1948, this almost thirty-year relationship was marked by a search of a formal alliance. This thesis, by presenting a panoptical survey of early Zionist-Maronite relations, explores the many dimensions of this pursuit. It details the Zionists and Maronites’ numerous commonalities that made an alliance desirable and apparently possible; it profiles the specific elements among the Zionists and Maronites who sought an entente; it examines each of the measures the two peoples took to this end; and it analyzes why this protracted pursuit ultimately failed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lose Your Privileges Or Gain a Homeland? by Mohamed Gameel
    Lose Your Privileges or Gain a Homeland? By Mohamed Gameel Hassan Asfour, senior Oslo-era negotiator for the Palestine Liberation Organization, discusses why the Oslo Accords were doomed and the next step: declaring an independent Palestinian nation s a leading Palestinian agitator and communist, Hassan Asfour, 69, has a history of political activism that eventually landed him a principal role at AOslo’s secret talks in 1993. Because of his Communist Party affiliations, Asfour moved from one Arab country to another. He left Jordan in 1969 for Iraq. He was expelled in 1975 to Syria, where he was arrested and spent sixteen months in jail. In 1977, Asfour was deported to Lebanon where he resided until the 1982 Israeli invasion and siege of Beirut. He eventually landed in Tunisia and became active in the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). First Asfour was assigned by the Palestinian Communist Party in 1984 to coordinate the communists’ relationship with the PLO’s main political party, Fatah. Then, in 1987, Asfour was assigned to manage an organizational branch of the PLO. He became part of Yasser Arafat’s inner circle and was handed the job of coordinating the Palestinian delegation’s Madrid conference visit in 1991. Following Madrid, Asfour became one of only two PLO leaders to be selected as the Palestinians’ principal negotiator in crafting the Oslo Accords. Asfour next joined the post-Oslo Israeli–Palestinian talks as Secretary of Negotiations, a post he held from 1998 until he resigned in 2005. Despite the success of being part of the PLO negotiation team which gained significant concessions from the “enemy” (Israel), Asfour cannot ignore the mishaps that he feels caused Oslo’s “clinical death.” Seeing no future for the peace process and faulting the Palestinian National Authority (PNA) leadership, Asfour is an open critic of the PNA, and its incumbent president Mahmoud Abbas.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GREAT POWERS and the EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN
    Boston University THE GREAT POWERS and the EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN CAS IR 325 / HI 229 Fall Semester 2016 Tuesday and Thursday 11:00-12:30 Prof. Erik Goldstein Office Hours: Tues./ Thurs. 2-3 Office: 152 Bay State Road, 3rd Floor Thurs: 9.30-10.30 Telephone: 353-9280 tel. preferred to email COURSE SYLLABUS Course Description This course will look at the Eastern Mediterranean as a centre of Great Power confrontation, and consider such issues as the impact of the competition on wider international relations, the domestic impact on the region of this involvement, the role of seapower, the origins and conduct on wars in the region, and attempts at conflict resolution. Objectives To provide an understanding of the nature of Great Power rivalry, to gain insight into the underlying factors affecting international relations in the Eastern Mediterranean, and to consider how governments evolve and implement policy. Requirements Mid-term examination 30% (18 Oct. 2016) Comprehensive final examination. 70% (to be detemined by University Registrar) All class members are expected to maintain high standards of academic honesty and integrity. The College of Arts and Sciences’ pamphlet “Academic Conduct Code” provides the standards and procedures. Cases of suspected academic misconduct will be referred to the Dean’s Office. Students are reminded that attendance is required, and reasons for non-attendance should be notified to the instructor. Cell phones are to be turned off. Repeated disruption caused by phones ringing will result in a grade penalty to be determined by the instructor. Laptops should be used for class purposes only during class.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Wars, 1947-93
    Israel’s Wars, 1947–93 Warfare and History General Editor Jeremy Black Professor of History, University of Exeter European warfare, 1660–1815 Jeremy Black The Great War, 1914–18 Spencer C. Tucker Wars of imperial conquest in Africa, 1830–1914 Bruce Vandervort German armies: war and German politics, 1648–1806 Peter H. Wilson Ottoman warfare, 1500–1700 Rhoads Murphey Seapower and naval warfare, 1650–1830 Richard Harding Air power in the age of total war, 1900–60 John Buckley Frontiersmen: warfare in Africa since 1950 Anthony Clayton Western warfare in the age of the Crusades, 1000–1300 John France The Korean War Stanley Sandler European and Native-American warfare, 1675–1815 Armstrong Starkey Vietnam Spencer C. Tucker The War for Independence and the transformation of American society Harry M. Ward Warfare, state and society in the Byzantine world, 565–1204 John Haldon Soviet military system Roger Reese Warfare in Atlantic Africa, 1500–1800 John K. Thornton The Soviet military experience Roger Reese Warfare at sea, 1500–1650 Jan Glete Warfare and society in Europe, 1792–1914 Geoffrey Wawro Israel’s Wars, 1947–93 Ahron Bregman Israel’s Wars, 1947–93 Ahron Bregman London and NewYork First published 2000 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, NewYork, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2001. © 2000 Ahron Bregman All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • What Kind of Future for the Port of Beirut?
    What kind of future for the Port of Beirut? by Leila J. Sawaya Bachelor of Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering, American University of Beirut, 2000 Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2002 @ Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2002. All rights reserved. Signature of Author- Department of CiUji and Environmental Engineering August 16, 2002 Certified by: Professor Fred Moavenzadeh Departmen of Civil and Environmental Engineering / Thesis Co-Supervisor Accepted by_ K Oral Buyukozturk Chairman, Departmental Committee on Graduate Studies What kind of future for the Port of Beirut? by Leila J. Sawaya Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on August 23, 2002, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering ABSTRACT The purpose of my thesis is to try to determine whether the port of Beirut can take advantage of his geographical position and redefine its role as either a transshipment hub or a transit gateway. It is obvious that in the present there are various new players that were able to take advantage of their location and of the technological changes to improve the performance of their ports while Lebanon was still trying to recover from its destroying war. The advance in technologies and the move to containerized traffic have rendered old port structures completely obsolete in favor of new ports that were able to cater for the new needs of this century.
    [Show full text]
  • From Cast Lead to Protective Edge: Lessons from Israel's Wars in Gaza
    From Cast Lead to Protective Edge Lessons from Israel’s Wars in Gaza Raphael S. Cohen, David E. Johnson, David E. Thaler, Brenna Allen, Elizabeth M. Bartels, James Cahill, Shira Efron C O R P O R A T I O N For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR1888 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9787-3 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2017 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Cover photos (clockwise): Nir Elias/Reuters; Amir Cohen/Reuters; Abu Mustafa/Reuters; Tsafrir Abayov/AP Photo Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface This report examines the Israel Defense Forces operations in Gaza from the end of Operation Cast Lead in 2009 through Operation Pillar of Defense in 2012 to Operation Protective Edge in 2014.
    [Show full text]