DOCSLIB.ORG

Fisheries Statistics Australian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fisheries Statistics Australian Australian Government Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics – Bureau of Rural Sciences Australianfisheries statistics 2009 August 2010 Note to the readers The data is accurate at the time of publication but updates may subsequently be available on state websites until they can be incorporated into the following year’s publication. A wider data set is available on request. © ABARE–BRS and FRDC 2010 This work is copyright. The Copyright Act 1968 permits fair dealing for study, research, news reporting, criticism or review. Selected passages, tables or diagrams may be reproduced for such purposes provided acknowledgment of the source is included. Major extracts or the entire document may not be reproduced by any process without the written permission of the Executive Director, ABARE–BRS. The Australian Government acting through Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics – Bureau of Rural Sciences has exercised due care and skill in the preparation and compilation of the information and data set out in this publication. Notwithstanding, the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics – Bureau of Rural Sciences, its employees and advisers disclaim all liability, including liability for negligence, for any loss, damage, injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of accessing, using or relying upon any of the information or data set out in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law. ISSN 1037-6879 ABARE–BRS 2010, Australian fisheries statistics 2009, Canberra, August. Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics – Bureau of Rural Sciences Postal address GPO Box 1563 Canberra ACT 2601 Australia Switchboard +61 2 6272 2010 Facsimile +61 2 6272 2001 Email [email protected] Web abare-brs.gov.au ABARE–BRS project 3298 Fisheries Research and Development Corporation PO Box 222 Deakin West ACT 2000 Telephone +61 2 6285 0400 Facsimile +61 0 6285 4421 Internet www.frdc.com.au On 1 July 2010, the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARE) and the Bureau of Rural Sciences (BRS) merged to form ABARE–BRS. Acknowledgments Thuy Pham prepared this report. The assistance of officers from state fisheries departments and the Australian Fisheries Management Authority, researchers and various industry representatives is gratefully acknowledged. The Australian Bureau of Statistics supplied the trade data. Funding for this report was provided by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation and the Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. Foreword Australian fisheries statistics is an annual report that has been in publication since 1991. It provides annual updates of fisheries production and trade data and serves as an important source of information for the fishing and aquaculture industry, fisheries managers, policymakers and researchers. The estimates of the gross value of production provided in the report are used for a range of purposes; for example, to determine Commonwealth, state and territory fisheries research funding arrangements each year. The current report contains data on the volume and value of production from state and Commonwealth commercial fisheries, and on the volume and value of Australian fisheries trade, by destination, source and product. Profiles of Commonwealth and state commercial fisheries and state aquaculture for 2008 and 2009 are also provided. These cover selected species, fishing methods and number of licence holders. Additional information is also provided on the recreational fishing sector and the indigenous fishing sector. The amount of information included in the report regarding these two sectors is expected to increase in future reports. Australian fisheries statistics is part of a suite of ABARE–BRS publications that provide a comprehensive account of historical trends in, and the outlook for, Australian fisheries. Australian commodity statistics provides a historical series of production and trade statistics for fisheries and a range of other commodities. Australian commodities includes forecasts for major fisheries commodities, which are updated each quarter. Detailed analysis of the economic performance of selected fisheries is provided in the annual Australian fisheries survey report. An assessment of the economic performance of all fisheries managed by the Australian Fisheries Management Authority is provided in Fishery status reports. Phillip Glyde Executive Director August 2010 iii Inquiries Inquiries regarding Commonwealth and state information should be directed to the respective coordinators of fisheries statistics shown below. New South Wales Laurie Derwent (Wild sector) NSW Fisheries Ph: (02) 9527 8568 Fax: (02) 9527 8409 Janine Sakker (Aquaculture) NSW Fisheries Ph: (02) 4916 3847 Fax: (02) 4982 1107 Victoria Mark Taylor and Paula Baker Victorian Department of Primary Industries Ph: (03) 5561 9964 Queensland Lew Williams (Wild sector) Fisheries Queensland, Department of Employment Economic Development and Innovation (DEEDI) Ph: (07) 3224 2550 Fax: (07) 3224 2805 Ross Lobegeiger and Max Wingfield (Aquaculture) Fisheries Queensland, Department of Employment Economic Development and Innovation (DEEDI) Ph: (07) 3400 2040 Fax: (07) 3408 3535 Western Australia Eva Lai and Mark Cliff Western Australian Department of Fisheries Ph: (08) 9203 0111 Fax: (08) 9203 0199 South Australia Angelo Tsolos (Wild sector) South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI) Ph: (08) 8207 5414 Fax: (08) 8207 5415 iv Inquiries Natalie Prior (Aquaculture) Department of Primary Industries and Resources South Australia (PIRSA) Ph: (08) 8226 2258 Fax: (08) 8226 0330 Tasmania Denise Garcia Marine Resources Division Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Tasmania Ph: (03) 6233 6723 Fax: (03) 6233 3198 Northern Territory Maree Apostoles NT Fisheries Department of Resources (DoR) Ph: (08) 8999 2305 Fax: (08) 8999 2057 Commonwealth Thim Skousen and Selvy Coundjidapadam Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) Ph: (02) 6225 5350 Fax: (02) 6225 5500 Mal Heath (Licensing) Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA) Ph: (02) 6225 5421 v Definitions and explanations Aquaculture production is the live weight quantity of product produced and marketed by aquaculturists. Aquaculture value is the assessed value received by aquaculturists on the basis of an ‘at farm- gate’ equivalent, for product marketed. Export quantity data are supplied by the Australian Bureau of Statistics on the basis of the net product weight exported. Export value data are supplied by the Australian Bureau of Statistics on the basis of free on board value. Import quantity data are supplied by the Australian Bureau of Statistics on the basis of the net product weight imported. Import value data are supplied by the Australian Bureau of Statistics on the basis of product cost. The value excludes insurance and freight costs in delivering the commodity to Australia from the port of origin but may include inland freight and insurance costs incurred in delivering the commodity to the port of origin. Production quantity is a measure of the quantity of fish product landed by fishery, usually on the basis of catch records. Production value is the assessed value at the point of landing for the quantity produced and excludes transport and marketing costs. Products consist of fisheries products marketed for human consumption plus non-edible fisheries products. Real terms/real prices are historical or future prices adjusted to reflect changes to the purchasing power of money (most commonly measured by the consumer price index). Re-imports (included in merchandise imports statistics) are goods originally exported, which are subsequently imported in either the same condition in which they were exported, or after undergoing repair or minor operations which leave them essentially unchanged. Minor operations include blending, packaging, bottling, cleaning and sorting. vi Definitions and explanations ‘Reals’ and rounding—‘Real’ 2008–09 dollars or ‘real terms’ refer to the conversion of nominal dollar values to take account of inflation. Comparison from year to year is expressed in nominal terms unless stated otherwise. Small discrepancies in totals are generally caused by the rounding components. A dash (-) is used to denote a nil or negligible amount. Seafood is any fish or other aquatic plant or animal intended for human consumption; it excludes non-edible fisheries products. Southern bluefin tuna sold from aquaculture farms in South Australia is reported at its market value. However, the input value of those tuna is also included as a production output from the Commonwealth’s Southern Bluefin Tuna Fishery. To avoid double counting, the input value is netted out of Australian totals. Abbreviations and symbols kg kilogram t tonne kt kilotonne $ dollar (Australian) $’000 thousand dollars (Australian) $m million dollars (Australian) $b billion dollars (Australian) fob free on board AFZ Australian Fishing Zone na not available nei not elsewhere included w wild catch a aquaculture vii Contents Production 1 Fast facts 1 Production by species 2 Production by jurisdiction 7 Production by sector 16 Trade 19 Fast facts 19 Exports and imports 20 Exports by commodity 21 Exports by destination 23 Exports by state 24 Imports by commodity 25 Imports by source 27 Employment 29 Fast facts 29 Recreational and charter fishing 32 Indigenous fishing 34 Profile of Australian fisheries 39 References 48 viii Production
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES and RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: a Guide for USAID Staff and Partners
    SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES AND RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: A Guide for USAID Staff and Partners June 2013 ABOUT THIS GUIDE GOAL This guide provides basic information on how to design programs to reform capture fisheries (also referred to as “wild” fisheries) and aquaculture sectors to ensure sound and effective development, environmental sustainability, economic profitability, and social responsibility. To achieve these objectives, this document focuses on ways to reduce the threats to biodiversity and ecosystem productivity through improved governance and more integrated planning and management practices. In the face of food insecurity, global climate change, and increasing population pressures, it is imperative that development programs help to maintain ecosystem resilience and the multiple goods and services that ecosystems provide. Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem functions are central to maintaining ecosystem integrity, health, and productivity. The intent of the guide is not to suggest that fisheries and aquaculture are interchangeable: these sectors are unique although linked. The world cannot afford to neglect global fisheries and expect aquaculture to fill that void. Global food security will not be achievable without reversing the decline of fisheries, restoring fisheries productivity, and moving towards more environmentally friendly and responsible aquaculture. There is a need for reform in both fisheries and aquaculture to reduce their environmental and social impacts. USAID’s experience has shown that well-designed programs can reform capture fisheries management, reducing threats to biodiversity while leading to increased productivity, incomes, and livelihoods. Agency programs have focused on an ecosystem-based approach to management in conjunction with improved governance, secure tenure and access to resources, and the application of modern management practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Recirculating Aquaculture Tank Production Systems: Aquaponics—Integrating Fish and Plant Culture
    SRAC Publication No. 454 November 2006 VI Revision PR Recirculating Aquaculture Tank Production Systems: Aquaponics—Integrating Fish and Plant Culture James E. Rakocy1, Michael P. Masser2 and Thomas M. Losordo3 Aquaponics, the combined culture of many times, non-toxic nutrients and Aquaponic systems offer several ben- fish and plants in recirculating sys- organic matter accumulate. These efits. Dissolved waste nutrients are tems, has become increasingly popu- metabolic by-products need not be recovered by the plants, reducing dis- lar. Now a news group (aquaponics- wasted if they are channeled into charge to the environment and [email protected] — type sub- secondary crops that have economic extending water use (i.e., by remov- scribe) on the Internet discusses value or in some way benefit the pri- ing dissolved nutrients through plant many aspects of aquaponics on a mary fish production system. uptake, the water exchange rate can daily basis. Since 1997, a quarterly Systems that grow additional crops be reduced). Minimizing water periodical (Aquaponics Journal) has by utilizing by-products from the pro- exchange reduces the costs of operat- published informative articles, con- duction of the primary species are ing aquaponic systems in arid cli- ference announcements and product referred to as integrated systems. If mates and heated greenhouses where advertisements. At least two large the secondary crops are aquatic or water or heated water is a significant suppliers of aquaculture and/or terrestrial plants grown in conjunc- expense. Having a secondary plant hydroponic equipment have intro- tion with fish, this integrated system crop that receives most of its required duced aquaponic systems to their is referred to as an aquaponic system catalogs.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Potential Interactions and Impacts of Commercial Fishing Methods on Marine Habitats and Species Protected Under the Eu Habitats Directive
    THE N2K GROUP European Economic Interest Group OVERVIEW OF THE POTENTIAL INTERACTIONS AND IMPACTS OF COMMERCIAL FISHING METHODS ON MARINE HABITATS AND SPECIES PROTECTED UNDER THE EU HABITATS DIRECTIVE Contents GLOSSARY................................................................................................................................................3 1. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................6 1.1 Fisheries interactions ....................................................................................................................7 2. FISHERIES AND NATURA 2000 - PRESSURES, INTERACTIONS, AND IMPACTS ....................................8 2.1 POTENTIAL PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PRESSURES AND IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH COMMERCIAL FISHING METHODS ............................................................................................8 DREDGES .......................................................................................................................................11 TRAWL - PELAGIC ..........................................................................................................................12 HOOK & LINE.................................................................................................................................12 TRAPS ............................................................................................................................................12 NETS ..............................................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Fisheries and Aquaculture Statistics 2015
    Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Australian fisheries and aquaculture statistics 2015 Research by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences DECEMBER 2016 ABARES i Australian fisheries and aquaculture statistics 2015 © Commonwealth of Australia 2016 Ownership of intellectual property rights The Australian Government acting through the Department Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual of Agriculture and Water Resources, represented by the property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). and Sciences, has exercised due care and skill in preparing and compiling the information and data in this publication. Creative Commons licence Notwithstanding, the Department of Agriculture and Water All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Resources, ABARES, its employees and advisers disclaim all Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, save for content liability, including for negligence and for any loss, damage, supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of Arms. of accessing, using or relying on information or data in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a Acknowledgements standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ au/deed.en. The full licence terms are available from ABARES thanks state and territory fisheries departments and creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode.
    [Show full text]
  • Pottawatomie County Is Home to Aquaponics Farm
    Pottawatomie County is home to aquaponics farm By Donna Sullivan, Editor Once the fry are hatched, What began as an effort Sperman uses a net to scoop to ensure his diabetic father a them into a bucket to trans- reliable protein supply if port to fry pools. The bread availability to his medication and butter of his business is were interrupted has grown selling three-quarter to one- into a growing business ven- inch fry in bulk. “When fry ture for Pottawatomie Coun- are the size of mosquito lar- ty resident James Sperman. vae, they’re not the most re- Travelers along Highway 24 silient things in the world,” between Manhattan and he said. So he waits about Wamego may have noticed two weeks for them to grow the high tunnel, semi-pit to around an inch, then ships greenhouse and large blue them nationwide. “None of pools that house his my fish go to waste,” he con- aquaponic gardening system tinued. “The ones that I and tilapia farm. don’t manage to find homes Aquaponics combines for can grow and become fish farming with hydropon- adolescents and some are ic gardening inside a high just on the verge of becom- tunnel, which allows for the ing breeders and will be- production of fruits, vegeta- come pond stockers.” bles and fish year-round. The Sperman says that be- system has a 1,700-gallon cause tilapia are predomi- fish tank and 165-square- nantly vegetarian and are fil- foot grow bed. Water from ter feeders, the algae and the fish tank carries fish bacteria that grows in the waste to the grow bed, where James Sperman describes how he feeds the fish at only one end of the pond since the females release their eggs pools is tailored perfectly to it feeds the plants.
    [Show full text]
  • FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations
    FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations .........................................................................................3 Region 1 Reports: Northwest Montana ..........................................................................................................5 Region 2 Reports: West Central Montana .....................................................................................................17 Region 3 Reports: Southwest Montana ........................................................................................................34 Region 4 Reports: North Central Montana ...................................................................................................44 Region 5 Reports: South Central Montana ...................................................................................................65 Region 6 Reports: Northeast Montana ........................................................................................................73 Region 7 Reports: Southeast Montana .........................................................................................................86 Montana Fish Hatchery Reports: .......................................................................................................................92 Murray Springs Trout Hatchery ...................................................................................................................92 Washoe Park Trout Hatchery .......................................................................................................................93
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing Trolling Lines
    CHAPTER 3 PREPARING TROLLING LINES A. TOOLS AND UTENSILS B. HOOKS -Hook types -Sharpening hooks -Ganging hooks C. 'TYPES OF FISHING LINE -Handling lines -Line characteristics D. END LOOPS IN LINE AND SINGLE-STRAND WIRE -Double figure-eight knot -Using end loops -End loops in wire E. .END LOOPS IN ROPE -Whipping and sealing rope ends -Bowline knot -Eye splice F. END LOOPS IN CABLE (MULTI-STRAND WIRE) -Wrapped end loops -Flemish eye -Crimping cable -Lazy splice G. KNOTS FOR HOOKS AND TACKLE -Palomar knot -Slip knot -Clinch knot -'Trilene' knot -Tying a hook rigid on wire H. JOINING LINES TOGETHER -Blood knot (Barrel knot) -Double slip knot -Using end loops -Connector rings and swivels I. THE ASSEMBLED TROLLING LINE -The mainline -The trace -Changing traces- Trace length -The backing J. SINKERS -Heavier line materials -Sinkers -Downriggers -Cannonballs K. DIVING DEVICES -Diving boards -Tripping -Diving lures -Trolling depth L. RIGGING FIXED LINES -Making shock absorbers -Rigging shock absorbers -Position -Backing cord and lazy line -Line storage M. RIGGING LINES ON HAND REELS -Loading the reel -Overloading -Adjustments -Using wire N. RIGGING HANDREELS FOR TROLLING -Rigging through a trolling boom -Rabbit line -Boom stays -Braking system (drag) -Lazy line 29 CHAPTER 3: PREPARING TROLLING LINES SECTION A: TOOLS AND UTENSILS Most of the preparation for trolling is normally done on shore before the fishing trip starts. This makes gear rigging easier and more comfortable, prevents new materials being contaminated with salt water before they are used, and avoids wasting time at sea which could better be used in fishing or carrying out other tasks on the boat.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Basics – Fishing Vessels Fishing Vessel Types
    Fishery Basics – Fishing Vessels Fishing Vessel Types Fishing vessels are typically designed with a specific purpose. That purpose is to locate, catch, and preserve fish while out at sea. The planned operations of a vessel determine the overall size of the vessel, the arrangement of the deck, carrying capacity, as well as the machinery and types of equipment that will be supported by the vessel. Due to the inherent differences in fishing communities around the world, there is a wide range of types and styles of fishing vessels. Vessel sizes can range from the 2 m (6 ft) dug out canoes used in subsistence and artisanal fisheries, to factory ships that exceed 130 m (427 ft) in length. Commercial fishing vessels can also be characterized by a variety of criteria: types of fish (See Biology & Ecology) they catch, fishing gear and methods used (See Fishing Gear), capacity and processing capabilities, and the geographical origin of the vessel. In 2002, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimated the world fishing fleet had approximately four million vessels, with an average vessel size ranging from 10-15 m (33-49 ft). Based on a quarterly catch statistics report, published by the Pacific Fisheries Information Network (PacFIN), approximately 1,950 vessels landed their catches in California ports. Due to the technological innovations that began in the 1950s, many fishing vessels are now classified as multi-purpose vessels, because of the ability to switch out gear types depending on the targeted species. However, single use vessels still exist in the world fishing fleet today.
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Shrimp Production in Thailand
    A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Shrimp Production in Thailand THE CASE FOR IMPROVED ECONOMICS AND SUSTAINABILITY Boston Consulting Group partners with leaders in business and society to tackle their most important challenges and capture their greatest opportunities. BCG was the pioneer in business strategy when it was founded in 1963. Today, we help clients with total transformation—inspiring complex change, enabling organizations to grow, building competitive advantage, and driving bottom-line impact. To succeed, organizations must blend digital and human capabilities. Our diverse, global teams bring deep industry and functional expertise and a range of perspectives to spark change. BCG delivers solutions through leading-edge management consulting along with technology and design, corporate and digital ventures—and business purpose. We work in a uniquely collaborative model across the firm and throughout all levels of the client organization, generating results that allow our clients to thrive. A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO SUSTAINABLE SHRIMP PRODUCTION IN THAILAND THE CASE FOR IMPROVED ECONOMICS AND SUSTAINABILITY HOLGER RUBEL WENDY WOODS DAVID PÉREZ SHALINI UNNIKRISHNAN ALEXANDER MEYER ZUM FELDE SOPHIE ZIELCKE CHARLOTTE LIDY CAROLIN LANFER July 2019 | Boston Consulting Group CONTENTS 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 MARKET FORCES ARE RESHAPING THE GLOBAL SHRIMP INDUSTRY 8 THE THAI SHRIMP INDUSTRY IS AT AN INFLECTION POINT The Perfect Storm Has Hit Thai Shrimp Production in Recent Years Thailand Is Weathering the Storm but Is Still Losing Ground
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic and Demographic Implications of Aquaculture in White Sturgeon (Acipenser Transmontanus) Conservation
    1733 Genetic and demographic implications of aquaculture in white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) conservation Henriette I. Jager Abstract: This study uses a genetic individual-based model of white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) populations in a river to examine the genetic and demographic trade-offs associated with operating a conservation hatchery. Simula- tion experiments evaluated three management practices: (i) setting quotas to equalize family contributions in an effort to prevent genetic swamping, (ii) an adaptive management scheme that interrupts stocking when introgression exceeds a specified threshold, and (iii) alternative broodstock selection strategies that influence domestication. The first set of simulations, designed to evaluate equalizing the genetic contribution of families, did not show the genetic benefits expected. The second set of simulations showed that simulated adaptive management was not successful in controlling introgression over the long term, especially with uncertain feedback. The third set of simulations compared the effects of three alternative broodstock selection strategies on domestication for hypothetical traits controlling early density-dependent survival. Simulated aquaculture selected for a density-tolerant phenotype when broodstock were taken from a genetically connected population. Using broodstock from an isolated population (i.e., above an upstream barrier or in a different watershed) was more effective at preventing domestication than using wild broodstock from a connected population.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Plan to Support the Improvement of the Yellowfin Tuna (Thunnus Albacares) Small-Scale Fishery in the Galapagos Marine Reserve, Ecuador
    Business plan to support the improvement of the yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) small-scale fishery in the Galapagos Marine Reserve, Ecuador Developed as part of the GEF-funded, World Bank-implemented Ocean Partnerships for Sustainable Fisheries and Biodiversity Conservation (OPP), a sub-project of the Common Oceans ABNJ Program led by UN-FAO Fishery location: Galapagos Islands, Ecuador Report authors: Viteri, C., Obregón, P., Castrejón, M., and Yoshioka, J. Organization: Conservation International Report date: December 2018 1 Version Control Amendments Issued Version No. Date Description of Amendment 1.0 October 23 2018 First draft 2.0 December 31 2018 Second draft The current materials drafted by Conservation International are a product of the GEF-funded, World Bank- implemented project titled 'Ocean Partnership for Sustainable Fisheries and Biodiversity Conservation (OPP)', and is part of the FAO Common Oceans Program. The opinions expressed in this report belong solely to the authors, and are not necessarily endorsed by reviewers, by the GEF or by the World Bank". This document is to be cited as: Viteri, C., Obregón, P., Castrejón, M., and Yoshioka, J. 2018. Business plan to support the improvement of the yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) small-scale fishery in the Galapagos Marine Reserve, Ecuador. Conservation International. 72 pp. Acknowledgements: The authors want to thank Scott Henderson, Jack Kittinger, Luis Suarez, Jerson Moreno, Mariana Vera, and the Galapagos National Park staff, particularly Harry Reyes and Danny Rueda for their support in the development of the Galapagos Tuna Business Case. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Investment overview 5 1. INTRODUCTION 10 2. CONTEXTUAL ANALYSIS 16 2.1 Overview and Background of The Galapagos Islands 16 2.2 Governance and management of the Galapagos Marine Reserve 17 2.3 The yellowfin tuna fishery 19 2.3.1 Stock status 21 2.3.2 Governance and management of the Galapagos tuna fishery 23 2.3.3 organization and entrepreneurial capacity of the small-scale fishing sector: 25 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Fisherman
    WILLIAM B. McCLOSKEY, JR. THE NEW FISHERMAN Hydraulic hoses and black boxes make fishing easier, but exact a price. We took hail and spray in our faces and crouched buoy of the first crab pot: barely a minute's search monkey-style to keep pace while working the gear on for a 2-foot pink buoy hidden in rolling seas during a a pitching deck glazed with ice. The wind blew a snowstom. straight 35 knots and gusted 60. Up through the Despite the weather, we worked all night, black hydraulic block zipped a crab pot-a 7-foot-square waves that could obliterate us towering over our by 3-foot steel-framed cage. Seven hundred pounds deck; worked without stop through all the daylight empty, it would now weigh 1000 to 2500 pou~ hours and on through the next night until about 2 depending on the number of king crabs insi£ Its AM. At last, peeling off our raingear but nothing else, trip up from the seafloor 60 fathoms below took we groaned to our bunks. about a minute. The pot surfaced in a froth of purple By the first grey light, the skipper had the wheel crab shapes and water. We braced it at the rail again. He slowed the engine, a standard signal. Our waiting for the proper boat motion, and swung it fishermen's discipline responded with feet back into aboard, holding tight to prevent a wild swing. Then it damp boots, salt-clammy raingear over our clothes. was teamwork on the run, to prepare the line and And so for seven days, until our tanks were filled.
    [Show full text]