DOCSLIB.ORG

FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations .........................................................................................3 Region 1 Reports: Northwest Montana ..........................................................................................................5 Region 2 Reports: West Central Montana .....................................................................................................17 Region 3 Reports: Southwest Montana ........................................................................................................34 Region 4 Reports: North Central Montana ...................................................................................................44 Region 5 Reports: South Central Montana ...................................................................................................65 Region 6 Reports: Northeast Montana ........................................................................................................73 Region 7 Reports: Southeast Montana .........................................................................................................86 Montana Fish Hatchery Reports: .......................................................................................................................92 Murray Springs Trout Hatchery ...................................................................................................................92 Washoe Park Trout Hatchery .......................................................................................................................93 Yellowstone River Trout Hatchery ...............................................................................................................94 Fort Peck Fish Hatchery ...............................................................................................................................95 Sekokini Springs Experimental Hatchery .....................................................................................................96 Jocko River Trout Hatchery ..........................................................................................................................97 Bluewater Springs Trout Hatchery ...............................................................................................................99 Giant Springs Fish Hatchery .......................................................................................................................100 Miles City State Fish Hatchery ...................................................................................................................101 Flathead Lake Salmon Hatchery ................................................................................................................102 Big Springs Trout Hatchery ........................................................................................................................103 Aquatic Invasive Species Report ......................................................................................................................104 Montana Fish Records .....................................................................................................................................106 This agency receives federal financial assistance and complies with all non-discrimination regulations. Please see full regulation booklet for additional information. Front cover: “Cutthroat with Fly” photo credit: Jason Blakney - 2 - FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 FWP Administrative Regions and Hatcheries FWP Regional Offices Headquarters Region 4 Butte Area Office 1420 E. 6th Avenue 4600 Giant Springs Road 1820 Meadowlark Lane Helena, MT 59601 Great Falls, MT 59405 Butte, MT 59701 406-444-2449 406-454-5840 406-494-1953 Region 1 Region 5 Havre Area Office 490 North Meridan Road 2300 Lake Elmo Drive 2165 Hwy 2 East Kalispell, MT 59901 Billings, MT 59105 Havre, MT 59501 406-752-5501 406-247-2940 406-265-6177 Region 2 Region 6 Helena Area Office 3201 Spurgin Road 1 Airport Road 930 Custer Avenue West Missoula, MT 59804 Glasgow, MT 59230 Helena, MT 59602 406-542-5500 406-228-3700 406-495-3260 Region 3 Region 7 Lewistown Area Office 1400 South 19th Avenue 352 I-94 Business Loop 333 Airport Road, Ste. 1 Bozeman, MT 59718z Miles City, MT 59301 Lewistown, MT 59457 406-577-7900 406-234-0900 406-538-4658 Hatcheries Big Springs Trout Hatchery Giant Springs Trout Sekokini Springs Hatchery 2051 Fish Hatchery Road Hatchery 490 North Meridian Road Lewistown, MT 59457 4801 Giant Springs Rd Kalispell, MT 59901 (406) 538-5588 Great Falls, MT 59405 (406) 857-3744 (406) 452-5734 Bluewater Springs Jocko River Trout Hatchery Washoe Park Trout Hatchery 206 Hatchery Lane Trout Hatchery 700 Bluewater Road Arlee, MT 59821 600 W Pennsylvania St Bridger, MT 59014 (406) 726-3344 Anaconda, MT 59711 (406) 668-7443 (406) 563-2531 Flathead Lake Salmon & Miles City Fish Hatchery Yellowstone River Rose Creek Hatchery 107 Fish Hatchery Road Trout Hatchery 100 Spring Creek Road Miles City, MT 59301 17 Fairgrounds Somers, MT 59932 (406) 234-4753 Big Timber, MT 59011 (406) 857-3744 (406) 932-4434 Fort Peck Hatchery Murray Springs 277 Highway 117 Trout Hatchery Fort Peck, MT 59223 5475 Sophie Lake Road (406) 526-3689 Eureka, MT 59917 (406) 889-3489 - 3 - FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 - 4 - FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 a “roving creel design” – where surveyors attempt Region 1 to interview anglers at common access points after they’ve completed their fishing trips. We also con- Northwest Montana ducted flights to count river users throughout the year, describing them along the way (for example: boater, Angler Use and Characteristics in the Upper Flat- shore angler, non-fishing boaters, etc.). By combing head River System this large body of information, we could make com- Amber Steed, Fisheries Biologist parisons over time and across areas in the drainage. Anglers are one of the most valuable sources of infor- So, what did we find? For starters, we connected mation that fisheries professionals have. So naturally, with nearly 1,400 anglers across all seasons and angler surveys are a critical tool for gathering useful have them to thank for the information we gained. and interesting information about our fisheries and We also performed 189 flights of the river to count their user groups, guiding management while con- users, helping us to estimate fishing pressure. As necting the public with resource managers. Often referred to as “creel” surveys, these stud- ies describe a wide range of fishery character- istics such as angling pressure, catch rates, har- vest rates, species composition, and the users themselves. However, collecting this information can be expensive and time-consuming, mak- ing frequent large-scale efforts impractical. Yet, it was recently time to revisit our understand- ing of the Flathead River’s fisheries, allowing for adaptive management (regulation chang- es, for example) based on data-driven work. Within the upper Flathead River system, large- scale angler surveys have been performed about once per decade since the early 1980s. For example, a “fisherman census” of the Main- stem and North Fork Flathead rivers was con- ducted during spring-fall 1982. Later, a “Flathead River Creel Report” was produced for one year during 1992-1993, expanding to the North and Middle forks as well as the Mainstem Flathead River. Then, during 2002-2003, an angler survey focused on just the Mainstem, surveying anglers during all seasons. Most recently during 2015- 2016, we repeated this last survey to update our understanding of how the Flathead River Figure 1.—Study area of the Flathead River system targeted by an angler survey was used by both anglers and non-anglers alike. conducted from March 2015 through February 2016. An additional Section 5 included the lower Flathead River sloughs, as in Deleray (2004). Angler access Prior angler surveys documented the fisheries points used by surveyors are shown by name and location, where FAS = Fishing changes associated with the establishment of Access Site. Mysis shrimp in Flathead Lake, which dramatically impacted native and non-native species and the fisher- you may imagine, that pressure increased since the ies they support. As in the past, our most recent angler early 2000s – by 80%! While that growth represents survey in 2015-2016 described fishing pressure, catch a big jump in use, it may not surprise residents and rates, harvest rates, species composition, and addi- longtime visitors to the area. We have seen a steady tional user information. Since the Flathead system is climb in local and statewide outdoor recreation large and accessible from many locations, we used - 5 - FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 ond (e.g., Northern Pikeminnow, Pea- mouth Chub, etc., often used as bait). Rounding out in third was Northern Pike. As in prior surveys, gear types and lure use varied across seasons and river sections to suit the fisheries they targeted. For example, fly-fishing and guided angling was most prevalent in the uppermost river sections from Blankenship Bridge downstream to Pressentine Bar FAS, while spin-casting ruled in the lower river near Sportsmans Bridge. Predictably, summer was the most popular season for both overall use and visitation by non-resident anglers. And when it came to boating, just over half (53%) of all users were not anglers – but only during summer months. Figure 2—Estimates of angler fishing pressure (hours) in the Flathead River, by section, during 2015-2016. River
Recommended publications
  • 2017 USFWS National Bison Range

    2017 USFWS National Bison Range

    P.O. Box 70 ∙ Polson, MT 59860 Flathead Lakers: (406) 883-1346 Working for clean water, a healthy Fax (406) 883-1357 ecosystem, and lasting quality of life in [email protected] the Flathead Watershed www.flatheadlakers.org National Bison Range Complex Comprehensive Conservation Plans Comments September 27, 2017 Bernardo Garza and Toni Griffin, Planning Team Co-Leaders U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Branch of Policy and Planning PO Box 25486 Denver, CO 80225-04865 Please accept the following comments submitted by the Flathead Lakers for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Bison Range Complex Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) development. The Flathead Lakers is a nonprofit, grassroots organization. Our organization was founded in 1958 and currently has over 1,500 members. We work to protect water quality in Flathead Lake and its watershed through education, advocacy and stewardship projects. Our beautiful lakes, rivers and streams, and the fish and wildlife that depend on them are part of what makes the Flathead such a special place and are a large part of its identity. The quality of the environment contributes to our quality of life and our economy. In fact, our quality natural environment has become a competitive advantage and a major force driving economic growth in Flathead County. The Flathead Lakers initiated the collaborative Critical Lands Project in 1999 to address concerns that rapid growth and development would damage lands and waters critical to maintaining the quality of Flathead Lake and its tributaries and the area’s quality of life. The Flathead Lakers coordinate the resulting partnership, the Flathead River to Lake Initiative (R2L), which includes representatives from federal, tribal, state, and local resource management agencies, land trusts, conservation groups and landowners.
  • Overview of the Marine Fish Hatchery Industry in Taiwan

    Overview of the Marine Fish Hatchery Industry in Taiwan

    Overview of the marine fish hatchery industry in Taiwan. Item Type Journal Contribution Authors Nocillado, Josephine N.; Liao, I Chiu Download date 01/10/2021 00:41:13 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/8923 Overview of the marine fish hatchery industry in Taiwan Josephine N. Nocilladoand I Chiu Liao Taiwan Fisheries Research Institute 199 Hou-Ih Road, Keelung 202 Taiwan T y p i c al broodstock ponds (right) in Taiwan. Striped threadfm broodstock are held in the pond on the lower right. At left is formulated broodstock diet During the Lunar New Year, the grandest of all holidays in Tai­ wan, images of fish are prominently displayed everywhere. Among the Taiwanese, fish is considered auspicious and a sym­ bol of bounty. This is because the pronunciation of “fish” (yü) is similar to that of “surplus” (yü), indicating abundance and pros­ perity. A fish specialty, with the fish preferably presented in its entirety, is a constant fare on the dining table during special occa­ sions. And in the true Taiwanese tradition, this most special dish is served as the last course, something truly worth waiting for, and remembered. It was in the 1960s that the first successes on artificial propa­ Not surprisingly, fish culture is itself an age-old traditiongation in were achieved, this time in several species of Chinese carps Taiwan. Rearing fish in captivity is almost an art form for manyand other tilapias. Art and science combined, fish propagation in Taiwanese aquafarmers who inherited the skill from many ofTaiwan their took off to a great start.
  • Recommendations for Recreational Fisheries Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5

    Recommendations for Recreational Fisheries Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5

    PHAROS4MPAS SAFEGUARDING MARINE PROTECTED AREAS IN THE GROWING MEDITERRANEAN BLUE ECONOMY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RECREATIONAL FISHERIES CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 INTRODUCTION 5 PART ONE BACKGROUND INFORMATION: RECREATIONAL FISHERIES 7 Front cover: Catching a greater amberjack (Seriola dumerili) 1.1. Definition of recreational fisheries in the Mediterranean 9 from a big game fishing boat © Bulentevren / Shutterstock 1.2. Importance of recreational fisheries in Europe and the Mediterranean 10 1.3. The complexity of recreational fisheries in the Mediterranean 13 Publication We would like to warmly thank all the people and organizations who were part of the advisory group of Published in July 2019 by PHAROS4MPAs. this publication or kindly contributed in some other PART TWO © PHAROS4MPAs. All rights reserved way: Fabio Grati (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche - ISMAR), Reproduction of this publication for educational or other Antigoni Foutsi, Panagiota Maragou and Michalis Margaritis RECREATIONAL FISHERIES: INTERACTIONS WITH MARINE PROTECTED AREAS 15 non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written (WWF-Greece), Victoria Riera (Generalitat de Catalunya), Marta permission from the copyright holder provided the source is Cavallé (Life Platform), Jan Kappel (European Anglers Alliance), PART THREE fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale Anthony Mastitski (University of Miami), Sylvain Petit (PAP/ or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written RAC), Robert Turk (Institute of the Republic of Slovenia for Nature BENEFITS AND IMPACTS OF RECREATIONAL FISHERIES 21 permission of the copyright holder. Conservation), Paco Melia (Politechnica Milano), Souha El Asmi and Saba Guellouz (SPA/RAC), Davide Strangis and Lise Guennal 3.1. Social benefits and impacts 22 Citation of this report: Gómez, S., Carreño, A., Sánchez, (CRPM), Marie Romani, Susan Gallon and Wissem Seddik E., Martínez, E., Lloret, J.
  • Trout Fishing in Hillsdale July, 2012 Guy Winig, Member Hillsdale Conservation Advisory Council

    Trout Fishing in Hillsdale July, 2012 Guy Winig, Member Hillsdale Conservation Advisory Council

    Roe Jan Brown-released to fight another day. Trout Fishing in Hillsdale July, 2012 Guy Winig, member Hillsdale Conservation Advisory Council Trout are our canaries in a coalmine. They are an excellent indicator of stream health, requiring clean, cold, well-oxygenated water to thrive. Without very high quality surface waters, trout just cannot survive. Hillsdale is fortunate to have several miles of trout streams including the Roeliff Jansen Kill, Taconic Creek, Agawamuck Creek and Green River with numerous smaller and unnamed tributaries contributing to them. Our streams and their residents endure many perils including natural flood and drought cycles as well as man made impacts like pollution, invasive species, barriers and over –fishing. Erosion adds silt that smothers aquatic food sources and gravel spawning beds. Introduced Didymo algae (a.k.a. ‘Rock Snot’) now found in the Green River, also chokes the streambed. Loss of vegetation exposes water to heating and eliminates important breeding, feeding and cover areas for trout. Readers may recall the massive fish kill that resulted from the release of manure into the Roe Jan in the 90’s or tales of unscrupulous ‘sportsmen’ using small explosives and chlorine to kill all the fish in a segment of stream. Maybe the most harmful and insidious are non-point sources of pollution such as chemicals, fertilizers and heated runoff from parking lots, roads, roofs, crop fields and lawns. In 2009 and 2010, members of the community with help from the Columbia-Greene chapter of Trout Unlimited and the N.Y.S.D.E.C. Trees for Tributaries program planted several hundred small trees and shrubs on the banks and flood plain of the Roe Jan Kill through the Roe Jan Park in an effort to stabilize banks, introduce vegetative cover and provide shade to maintain cool stream temperatures.
  • Cobia Database Articles Final Revision 2.0, 2-1-2017

    Cobia Database Articles Final Revision 2.0, 2-1-2017

    Revision 2.0 (2/1/2017) University of Miami Article TITLE DESCRIPTION AUTHORS SOURCE YEAR TOPICS Number Habitat 1 Gasterosteus canadus Linné [Latin] [No Abstract Available - First known description of cobia morphology in Carolina habitat by D. Garden.] Linnaeus, C. Systema Naturæ, ed. 12, vol. 1, 491 1766 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) Ichthyologie, vol. 10, Iconibus ex 2 Scomber niger Bloch [No Abstract Available - Description and alternative nomenclature of cobia.] Bloch, M. E. 1793 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) illustratum. Berlin. p . 48 The Fisheries and Fishery Industries of the Under this head was to be carried on the study of the useful aquatic animals and plants of the country, as well as of seals, whales, tmtles, fishes, lobsters, crabs, oysters, clams, etc., sponges, and marine plants aml inorganic products of U.S. Commission on Fisheries, Washington, 3 United States. Section 1: Natural history of Goode, G.B. 1884 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) the sea with reference to (A) geographical distribution, (B) size, (C) abundance, (D) migrations and movements, (E) food and rate of growth, (F) mode of reproduction, (G) economic value and uses. D.C., 895 p. useful aquatic animals Notes on the occurrence of a young crab- Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 4 eater (Elecate canada), from the lower [No Abstract Available - A description of cobia in the lower Hudson Eiver.] Fisher, A.K. 1891 Wild (Atlantic/Pacific) 13, 195 Hudson Valley, New York The nomenclature of Rachicentron or Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum Habitat 5 Elacate, a genus of acanthopterygian The universally accepted name Elucate must unfortunately be supplanted by one entirely unknown to fame, overlooked by all naturalists, and found in no nomenclator.
  • Cheney District Fisheries Volume 9, Issue 2 Fall, 2018

    Cheney District Fisheries Volume 9, Issue 2 Fall, 2018

    Cheney District Fisheries Volume 9, Issue 2 Fall, 2018 District News: Cheney, Hutchinson and Wichita Fishing Hello everyone, I hope you all had a safe and fun summer fishing season! If you’re like me, you are probably looking forward to cooler temperatures, college football and hunting seasons ahead. Don’t forget that fall offers some of the best fishing opportunities of the year. Fish feeding activity increases when temperatures begin to Inside This Issue drop from their summer peak. The best part is that you may have the lake to yourself! Good luck out there! District News Cheney Reservoir Fishing Q&A New Brushpiles Paying Off Hook, Line & Sinker The Cedar trees that were placed in February 2018 are holding some big fish. KDWPT fisheries division staff sampled both sites with electrofishing for catfish in August. Numerous Blue Catfish up to 19 pounds and Flathead Catfish up to 40 pounds were sampled in each location. If you want to go after these fish, you may need to adjust you tactics somewhat. The blues are likely suspended in the upper half of the trees, and the flatheads are probably hanging out on the bottom under the trunks during the day. To target the blues, I At Right: KDWPT fisheries would suggest drifting cut shad biologists Craig Johnson and Lowell Aberson with a just over the tops of the trees, 32-inch Blue Catfish perhaps using a float to control electrofished from a the depth. For flatheads, try jigging live bait around the base of the trees; good boat brushpile site.
  • NW Montana Joint Information Center Fire Update August 27, 2003, 10:00 AM

    NW Montana Joint Information Center Fire Update August 27, 2003, 10:00 AM

    NW Montana Joint Information Center Fire Update August 27, 2003, 10:00 AM Center Hours 6 a.m. – 9 p.m. Phone # (406) 755-3910 www.fs.fed.us/nwacfire Middle Fork River from Bear Creek to West Glacier is closed. Stanton Lake area is reopened. Highway 2 is NOT closed. North Fork road from Glacier Rim to Polebridge is open but NO stopping along the road and all roads off the North Fork remain closed. The Red Meadows Road remains closed to the public. The Going-to-the-Sun Highway is open. Road #895 along the west side of Hungry Horse Reservoir is CLOSED to the junction of Road #2826 (Meadow Creek Road). Stage II Restrictions are still in effect. Blackfoot Lake Complex Includes the Beta Lake-Doris Ridge fires, Ball fire, and the Blackfoot lake complex of fires located on Flathead National Forest, south of Hungry Horse; Hungry Horse, MT. Fire Information (406) 755-3910, 892-0946. Size: unknown due to weather yesterday, a recon flight is planned for today Status: Doris Mountain Fire was active yesterday with runs in a northeast direction. Burnout operations were successful on the Beta Lake Fire. Ball Fire was very active and lines did not hold. The other fires within the complex were active but due to weather conditions information is still incoming. Road #895 from Highway 2 along the west side of Hungry Horse Reservoir to junction of Road #2826 is closed. Campgrounds along the Westside of the reservoir are also closed. Emery Campground is closed. Outlook: Burnout operations will continue today on the Beta Lake and Doris Mountain Fires as long as conditions allow.
  • FINAL CASE STUDY REPORT to the 60TH LEGISLATURE WATER POLICY INTERIM COMMITTEE (With Public Comments) by the Montana Bureau of M

    FINAL CASE STUDY REPORT to the 60TH LEGISLATURE WATER POLICY INTERIM COMMITTEE (With Public Comments) by the Montana Bureau of M

    FINAL CASE STUDY REPORT TO THE 60TH LEGISLATURE WATER POLICY INTERIM COMMITTEE (with public comments) by the Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology September 11, 2008 WPIC members: Senator Jim Elliott, Chair Senator Gary L Perry, vice Chair Representative Scott Boggio Representative Jill Cohenour Representative Bill McChesney Representative Walter McNutt Senator Larry Jent Senator Terry Murphy HB 831 Report CONTENTS Recommendations to the Water Policy Interim Committee ..............................................1 SECTION 1: General Concepts of Stream–Aquifer Interaction and Introduction to the Closed Basin Area .......................................................................................................3 Introduction ...............................................................................................................5 Th e Hydrologic Cycle ............................................................................................5 Occurrence of Ground Water .................................................................................5 Stream–Aquifer Interaction ...................................................................................7 Closed Basin Regional Summary ...............................................................................10 Geology ....................................................................................................................18 Distribution of Aquifers ............................................................................................19 Ground-Water
  • Water Quality Data Summary Report for Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area Preliminary Analysis of 2011 and 2012 Data

    Water Quality Data Summary Report for Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area Preliminary Analysis of 2011 and 2012 Data

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Water Quality Data Summary Report for Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area Preliminary Analysis of 2011 and 2012 Data Natural Resource Data Series NPS/GRYN/NRDS—2013/482 ON THE COVER Field activities in Layout Creek, Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area Photograph courtesy of NPS Water Quality Data Summary Report for Bighorn Canyon National Recreation Area Preliminary Analysis of 2011 and 2012 Data Natural Resource Data Series NPS/GRYN/NRDS—2013/482 Authors Andrew Ray Greater Yellowstone Inventory and Monitoring Network National Park Service 2327 University Way, Suite 2 Bozeman, Montana 59715 Katie Kleehammer W. Adam Sigler Montana State University Water Quality Extension Land Resources and Environmental Sciences P.O. Box 173120 Bozeman, MT 59717-3120 Editor Nina Chambers Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative P.O. Box 2705 Jackson, WY 83001 May 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change.
  • Guidelines for Electrofishing Waters Containing Salmonids Listed Under

    Guidelines for Electrofishing Waters Containing Salmonids Listed Under

    National Guidelines for Electrofishing Waters Marine Fisheries Containing Salmonids Listed Under Service the Endangered Species Act June 2000 Purpose and Scope The purpose of this document is to provide guidelines for the safe use of backpack electrofishing in waters containing salmonids listed by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). It is expected that these guidelines will help improve electrofishing technique in ways which will reduce fish injury and increase electrofishing efficiency. These guidelines and sampling protocol were developed from NMFS research experience and input from specialists in the electrofishing industry and fishery researchers. This document outlines electrofishing procedures and guidelines that NMFS has determined to be necessary and advisable when working in freshwater systems where threatened or endangered salmon and steelhead may be found. As such, the guidelines provide a basis for reviewing proposed electrofishing activities submitted to NMFS in the context of ESA Section 10 permit applications as well as scientific research activities proposed for coverage under an ESA Section 4(d) rule. These guidelines specifically address the use of backpack electrofishers for sampling juvenile or adult salmon and steelhead that are not in spawning condition. Electrofishing in the vicinity of adult salmonids in spawning condition and electrofishing near redds are not discussed as there is no justifiable basis for permitting these activities except in very limited situations (e.g., collecting brood stock, fish rescue, etc.). The guidelines also address sampling and fish handling protocols typically employed in electrofishing studies. While the guidelines contain many specifics, they are not intended to serve as an electrofishing manual and do not eliminate the need for good judgement in the field.
  • Localized Plankton Blooms and Jubilees on the Gulf Coast Gordon Gunter Gulf Coast Research Laboratory

    Localized Plankton Blooms and Jubilees on the Gulf Coast Gordon Gunter Gulf Coast Research Laboratory

    Gulf Research Reports Volume 6 | Issue 3 January 1979 Localized Plankton Blooms and Jubilees on the Gulf Coast Gordon Gunter Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Charles H. Lyles Gulf Coast Research Laboratory DOI: 10.18785/grr.0603.12 Follow this and additional works at: http://aquila.usm.edu/gcr Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Gunter, G. and C. H. Lyles. 1979. Localized Plankton Blooms and Jubilees on the Gulf Coast. Gulf Research Reports 6 (3): 297-299. Retrieved from http://aquila.usm.edu/gcr/vol6/iss3/12 This Short Communication is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf and Caribbean Research by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gulf Research Reports, Vol. 6,NO. 3,291-299, 1919. LOCALIZED PLANKTON BLOOMS AND JUBILEES ON THE GULF COAST GORDON GUNTER AND CHARLES H. LYLES Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564 and Gulf States Marine Fisheries Commission, Ocean Springs, Mississippi 39564 ABSTRACT The writers describe various small types of plankton blooms such as those occurring in boat slips, the head of a large bayou and a strip type bloom of Chaeroceras on the Gulf beach. Oyster kills from “poison water” draining off of marshes are said to be caused by plankton bloom. Small “jubilees” are said to be caused by localized blooms and one of these is described as it occurred. In November 1938, Dr. Margaretha Brongersma-Sanders of billions of Chaetoceras sp., a common open sea diatom.
  • History of Navigation on the Yellowstone River

    History of Navigation on the Yellowstone River

    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1950 History of navigation on the Yellowstone River John Gordon MacDonald The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation MacDonald, John Gordon, "History of navigation on the Yellowstone River" (1950). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2565. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2565 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HISTORY of NAVIGATION ON THE YELLOWoTGriE RIVER by John G, ^acUonald______ Ë.À., Jamestown College, 1937 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Mas­ ter of Arts. Montana State University 1950 Approved: Q cxajJL 0. Chaiinmaban of Board of Examiners auaue ocnool UMI Number: EP36086 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Ois8<irtatk>n PuUishing UMI EP36086 Published by ProQuest LLC (2012). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC.