DOCSLIB.ORG

Overview of the Potential Interactions and Impacts of Commercial Fishing Methods on Marine Habitats and Species Protected Under the Eu Habitats Directive

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Overview of the Potential Interactions and Impacts of Commercial Fishing Methods on Marine Habitats and Species Protected Under the Eu Habitats Directive THE N2K GROUP European Economic Interest Group OVERVIEW OF THE POTENTIAL INTERACTIONS AND IMPACTS OF COMMERCIAL FISHING METHODS ON MARINE HABITATS AND SPECIES PROTECTED UNDER THE EU HABITATS DIRECTIVE Contents GLOSSARY................................................................................................................................................3 1. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................6 1.1 Fisheries interactions ....................................................................................................................7 2. FISHERIES AND NATURA 2000 - PRESSURES, INTERACTIONS, AND IMPACTS ....................................8 2.1 POTENTIAL PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PRESSURES AND IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH COMMERCIAL FISHING METHODS ............................................................................................8 DREDGES .......................................................................................................................................11 TRAWL - PELAGIC ..........................................................................................................................12 HOOK & LINE.................................................................................................................................12 TRAPS ............................................................................................................................................12 NETS ..............................................................................................................................................13 AQUACULTURE - SHELLFISH..........................................................................................................14 AQUACULTURE - FINFISH ..............................................................................................................15 2.2 THE POTENTIAL INTERACTIONS AND IMPACTS OF FISHING METHODS ON Natura 2000 HABITATS ..........................................................................................................................................16 SANDBANKS ..................................................................................................................................17 POSIDONIA BEDS...........................................................................................................................17 ESTUARIES.....................................................................................................................................18 MUDFLATS & SANDFLATS .............................................................................................................18 COASTAL LAGOONS.......................................................................................................................19 LARGE SHALLOW INLETS & BAYS ..................................................................................................19 REEFS.............................................................................................................................................20 BOREAL BALTIC NARROW INLETS .................................................................................................20 SUBMARINE STRUCTURES MADE BY LEAKING GASES ..................................................................20 SUBMERGED OR PARTIALLY SUBMERGED SEA CAVES..................................................................20 2.3 THE POTENTIAL INTERACTIONS AND IMPACTS OF FISHING METHODS ON Natura 2000 SPECIES ..........................................................................................................................................................21 CETACEANS ...................................................................................................................................23 SEALS.............................................................................................................................................23 TURTLES ........................................................................................................................................23 FISH ...............................................................................................................................................23 SEABIRDS, WADERS & WILDFOWL................................................................................................24 2.4 THE POTENTIAL VULNERABILITY OF Natura 2000 HABITATS AND SPECIES TO DIFFERENT FISHING METHODS............................................................................................................................24 2.5. THE POTENTIAL VULNERABILITY OF Natura 2000 HABITATS AND SPECIES TO RECREATIONAL FISHING METHODS............................................................................................................................32 CONCLUSIONS.......................................................................................................................................33 KEY REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................................34 GLOSSARY Sensitivity1; Sensitivity is dependent on the intolerance of a species or habitat to damage from an external factor and the time taken for its subsequent recovery. • 'Intolerance' is the susceptibility of a habitat, community or species (i.e. the components of a biotope) to damage, or death, from an external factor. Intolerance must be assessed relative to change in a specific factor. • 'Recoverability' is the ability of a habitat, community, or species (i.e. the components of a biotope) to return to a state close to that which existed before the activity or event caused change. Pressure; The mechanism through which an activity has an effect on any part of the ecosystem Vulnerability; A habitat, community or species becomes ‘vulnerable’ to adverse effects when it is both sensitive and exposed to an external factor (pressure). Vulnerability thus combines sensitivity and exposure to a pressure Exposure; The presence or likelihood of encountering the pressure/activity (temporally and/or spatially) FISHING GEARS DEFINITIONS2 Dredge; an apparatus usually in the form of an oblong iron frame with an attached bag net Dredge (hand); Small, light dredge, pulled behind by hand in shallow waters, from the shore or from a boat. Dredge (boat); dredge of varying weight and size, but usually fairly heavy, equipped with or within diving boards. Dredge (mechanised); Water jets dislodge molluscs from the seabed ahead of the dredge. The catch may be transferred to the boat by a conveyor belt device or by pump. Drift longline; Longline set in midwater or near surface and allowed to drift with the current. Drift net; drifting gillnet. Net kept on the surface, or at a certain distance below it by numerous floats. It drifts freely with the current, separately or, more often, with the boat to which the net is attached. Fish trap: trap; trap net; an inshore fishing apparatus consisting of a series of funnels, with their mouths kept open by hoops, opening into each other and finally closing into a sack forming a trap. This type of net, of which there are many variations, is fastened to the bottom Fixed net; General term for any simple net when it is held in fishing trim by anchors, sinkers and/or stakes Fyke net; Trap normally used in shallow water which consists of cylindrical or cone-shaped bags mounted on rings or other rigid structures, completely covered by netting and completed by wings or leaders which drive the fish towards the opening of the bags. Fyke nets, fixed on the bottom by anchors, ballast or stakes, may be used separately or in groups. Gill net; usually rectangular in shape, made of thin twine, which catches fish by holding them in the meshes, e.g. drift net, set gill net. Held vertically in the water by floats and weights. Gill net (fixed); net mounted on stakes driven into the bottom, used essentially in coastal waters. The fish are collected at low tide. Gill net (encircling); Gear generally used in shallow water with the floatline remaining at the surface. After the fish have been encircled by the net, noise or other means are used to force them to gill or entangle themselves in the netting surrounding them. Handline; a hand-held line with weighted end and hooks used to fish above the seabed 1 http://www.marlin.ac.uk/sensitivityrationale.php 2 CEC (1992) Multilingual Dictionary of Fishing Gear. 2nd Edition. Fishing News Books. EUR 14426. 333pp. Lampara net; the particular design of this net, with a central bunt in the form of a spoon and two lateral wings, makes it possible to retain the shoal of fish when the two wings are hauled up at the same time. Lampara nets are generally operated by a single boat, most often of small tonnage. Long line; a number of connected lines, either set at the bottom or drifting, each bearing a large number of baited hooks. Longline (bottom set): Long line set near the seabed. Net; fishing net; a fishing implement comprised mainly of netting. An open-work fabric forming meshes of suitable size for catching fish Otter twin trawl; gear comprising two identical trawl nets working together, opened horizontally by a single pair of otter boards. The inner wings are attached to a sledge towed simultaneously with the otter boards from a common crowfoot. Otter trawl (midwater); trawl towed by a single boat. The horizontal opening of the net is controlled by otter boards,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES and RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: a Guide for USAID Staff and Partners
    SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES AND RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: A Guide for USAID Staff and Partners June 2013 ABOUT THIS GUIDE GOAL This guide provides basic information on how to design programs to reform capture fisheries (also referred to as “wild” fisheries) and aquaculture sectors to ensure sound and effective development, environmental sustainability, economic profitability, and social responsibility. To achieve these objectives, this document focuses on ways to reduce the threats to biodiversity and ecosystem productivity through improved governance and more integrated planning and management practices. In the face of food insecurity, global climate change, and increasing population pressures, it is imperative that development programs help to maintain ecosystem resilience and the multiple goods and services that ecosystems provide. Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem functions are central to maintaining ecosystem integrity, health, and productivity. The intent of the guide is not to suggest that fisheries and aquaculture are interchangeable: these sectors are unique although linked. The world cannot afford to neglect global fisheries and expect aquaculture to fill that void. Global food security will not be achievable without reversing the decline of fisheries, restoring fisheries productivity, and moving towards more environmentally friendly and responsible aquaculture. There is a need for reform in both fisheries and aquaculture to reduce their environmental and social impacts. USAID’s experience has shown that well-designed programs can reform capture fisheries management, reducing threats to biodiversity while leading to increased productivity, incomes, and livelihoods. Agency programs have focused on an ecosystem-based approach to management in conjunction with improved governance, secure tenure and access to resources, and the application of modern management practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Recirculating Aquaculture Tank Production Systems: Aquaponics—Integrating Fish and Plant Culture
    SRAC Publication No. 454 November 2006 VI Revision PR Recirculating Aquaculture Tank Production Systems: Aquaponics—Integrating Fish and Plant Culture James E. Rakocy1, Michael P. Masser2 and Thomas M. Losordo3 Aquaponics, the combined culture of many times, non-toxic nutrients and Aquaponic systems offer several ben- fish and plants in recirculating sys- organic matter accumulate. These efits. Dissolved waste nutrients are tems, has become increasingly popu- metabolic by-products need not be recovered by the plants, reducing dis- lar. Now a news group (aquaponics- wasted if they are channeled into charge to the environment and [email protected] — type sub- secondary crops that have economic extending water use (i.e., by remov- scribe) on the Internet discusses value or in some way benefit the pri- ing dissolved nutrients through plant many aspects of aquaponics on a mary fish production system. uptake, the water exchange rate can daily basis. Since 1997, a quarterly Systems that grow additional crops be reduced). Minimizing water periodical (Aquaponics Journal) has by utilizing by-products from the pro- exchange reduces the costs of operat- published informative articles, con- duction of the primary species are ing aquaponic systems in arid cli- ference announcements and product referred to as integrated systems. If mates and heated greenhouses where advertisements. At least two large the secondary crops are aquatic or water or heated water is a significant suppliers of aquaculture and/or terrestrial plants grown in conjunc- expense. Having a secondary plant hydroponic equipment have intro- tion with fish, this integrated system crop that receives most of its required duced aquaponic systems to their is referred to as an aquaponic system catalogs.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Authorized Fisheries and Fishing Gear
    Tab E, No. 7c Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 231 / Thursday, December 2, 1999 / Rules and Regulations 67511 This is a condensed version of the Federal Register notice DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE January 27, 1999, NMFS by final rule SUMMARY: NMFS revises the list of published the LOF (64 FR 4030). On National Oceanic and Atmospheric authorized fisheries and fishing gear July 28, 1999, NMFS delayed the Administration used in those fisheries (LOF) effectiveness of the LOF and invited contained in 50 CFR 600.725(v). additional public comments (64 FR 50 CFR Part 600 Effective December 1, 1999, no person 40781). This final rule revises the LOF or vessel may employ fishing gear or [Docket No. 980519132–9315–03; participate in a fishery in the and makes it effective on December 1, I.D.022498F] exclusive economic zone (EEZ) not 1999. RIN 0648–AK49 included in this LOF without giving 90 days’ advance notice to the Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; appropriate Fishery Management List of Fisheries and Gear, and Council (Council) or, with respect to Notification Guidelines Atlantic highly migratory species AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries (HMS), the Secretary of Commerce Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and (Secretary). Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), DATES: Effective December 1, 1999. Commerce. ADDRESSES: Copies of the regulatory ACTION: Final rule impact review for the final rule for . this action can be obtained from Dr. Gary C. Matlock, Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Send comments regarding the collection-of-information requirements associated with this rule to the above address and to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Washington, DC 20503 (Attention: NOAA Desk Officer).
    [Show full text]
  • Coryphaena Hippurus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Maltese Waters, Central Mediterranean M
    Research Article Mediterranean Marine Science Indexed in WoS (Web of Science, ISI Thomson) and SCOPUS The journal is available on line at http://www.medit-mar-sc.net DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.706 Age, Growth and Reproduction of Coryphaena hippurus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Maltese Waters, Central Mediterranean M. GATT1, M. DIMECH1 and P.J. SCHEMBRI1 1 Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida MSD 2080, Malta Corresponding author: [email protected] Handling Editor: Kostas Stergiou Received: 24 November 2014; Accepted: 22 January 2015; Published on line: 27 April 2015. Abstract Age, growth and reproduction of the dolphinfishCoryphaena hippurus Linnaeus, 1758 collected from the Central Mediterranean in the period 2004-2010 by the traditional Maltese fish aggregating devices (FAD) and surface longline fisheries were studied. The a and b parameters of the length-weight relationship for fish 11-142 cm fork length (FL) (n = 4042) were determined as a = 0.018 and 0.022 with b = 2.85 and 2.79, for males and females respectively. The counting of annual increments from dorsal spines of >65 cm FL dolphinfish at X25 magnification (n = 47) permitting an age reading resolution in years, and the counting of daily increments from sagittal otoliths of <65 cm FL dolphinfish at X400 magnification (n = 583) permitting an age reading resolution in days, were estimated; the von Bertalanffy growth model applied to these fish gave the following parameters:L∞ = 107.8 cm FL and 120.2 cm FL, and K = 1.9 yr-1 and 1.56 yr-1, for males and females respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Fisheries and Aquaculture Statistics 2015
    Department of Agriculture and Water Resources Australian fisheries and aquaculture statistics 2015 Research by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences DECEMBER 2016 ABARES i Australian fisheries and aquaculture statistics 2015 © Commonwealth of Australia 2016 Ownership of intellectual property rights The Australian Government acting through the Department Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual of Agriculture and Water Resources, represented by the property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). and Sciences, has exercised due care and skill in preparing and compiling the information and data in this publication. Creative Commons licence Notwithstanding, the Department of Agriculture and Water All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Resources, ABARES, its employees and advisers disclaim all Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, save for content liability, including for negligence and for any loss, damage, supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of Arms. of accessing, using or relying on information or data in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a Acknowledgements standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ au/deed.en. The full licence terms are available from ABARES thanks state and territory fisheries departments and creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode.
    [Show full text]
  • Pottawatomie County Is Home to Aquaponics Farm
    Pottawatomie County is home to aquaponics farm By Donna Sullivan, Editor Once the fry are hatched, What began as an effort Sperman uses a net to scoop to ensure his diabetic father a them into a bucket to trans- reliable protein supply if port to fry pools. The bread availability to his medication and butter of his business is were interrupted has grown selling three-quarter to one- into a growing business ven- inch fry in bulk. “When fry ture for Pottawatomie Coun- are the size of mosquito lar- ty resident James Sperman. vae, they’re not the most re- Travelers along Highway 24 silient things in the world,” between Manhattan and he said. So he waits about Wamego may have noticed two weeks for them to grow the high tunnel, semi-pit to around an inch, then ships greenhouse and large blue them nationwide. “None of pools that house his my fish go to waste,” he con- aquaponic gardening system tinued. “The ones that I and tilapia farm. don’t manage to find homes Aquaponics combines for can grow and become fish farming with hydropon- adolescents and some are ic gardening inside a high just on the verge of becom- tunnel, which allows for the ing breeders and will be- production of fruits, vegeta- come pond stockers.” bles and fish year-round. The Sperman says that be- system has a 1,700-gallon cause tilapia are predomi- fish tank and 165-square- nantly vegetarian and are fil- foot grow bed. Water from ter feeders, the algae and the fish tank carries fish bacteria that grows in the waste to the grow bed, where James Sperman describes how he feeds the fish at only one end of the pond since the females release their eggs pools is tailored perfectly to it feeds the plants.
    [Show full text]
  • FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations
    FISHING NEWSLETTER 2020/2021 Table of Contents FWP Administrative Regions and Hatchery Locations .........................................................................................3 Region 1 Reports: Northwest Montana ..........................................................................................................5 Region 2 Reports: West Central Montana .....................................................................................................17 Region 3 Reports: Southwest Montana ........................................................................................................34 Region 4 Reports: North Central Montana ...................................................................................................44 Region 5 Reports: South Central Montana ...................................................................................................65 Region 6 Reports: Northeast Montana ........................................................................................................73 Region 7 Reports: Southeast Montana .........................................................................................................86 Montana Fish Hatchery Reports: .......................................................................................................................92 Murray Springs Trout Hatchery ...................................................................................................................92 Washoe Park Trout Hatchery .......................................................................................................................93
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Salmon & Steelhead 2015-2020
    Pacific Salmon & Steelhead 2015-2020 Bibliography Trevor Riley, Head of Public Services, NOAA Central Library Katie Rowley, Research Librarian, NOAA Central Library Hope Shinn, Research Librarian, NOAA Central Library Jamie Roberts, Research Librarian, NOAA Central Library Erin Cheever, Research Librarian, NOAA Central Library NCRL subject guide 2020-15 https://doi.org/10.25923/7f5f-pz64 September 2020 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research NOAA Central Library – Silver Spring, Maryland Table of Contents Background & Scope ................................................................................................................................. 3 Sources Reviewed ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Section I: California Central Valley ............................................................................................................ 6 Section II: South-Central & Southern California Coast ........................................................................... 38 Section III: North-Central California Coast .............................................................................................. 47 Section IV: Southern Oregon & Northern California Coast ..................................................................... 76 Section V: Oregon Coast ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preparing Trolling Lines
    CHAPTER 3 PREPARING TROLLING LINES A. TOOLS AND UTENSILS B. HOOKS -Hook types -Sharpening hooks -Ganging hooks C. 'TYPES OF FISHING LINE -Handling lines -Line characteristics D. END LOOPS IN LINE AND SINGLE-STRAND WIRE -Double figure-eight knot -Using end loops -End loops in wire E. .END LOOPS IN ROPE -Whipping and sealing rope ends -Bowline knot -Eye splice F. END LOOPS IN CABLE (MULTI-STRAND WIRE) -Wrapped end loops -Flemish eye -Crimping cable -Lazy splice G. KNOTS FOR HOOKS AND TACKLE -Palomar knot -Slip knot -Clinch knot -'Trilene' knot -Tying a hook rigid on wire H. JOINING LINES TOGETHER -Blood knot (Barrel knot) -Double slip knot -Using end loops -Connector rings and swivels I. THE ASSEMBLED TROLLING LINE -The mainline -The trace -Changing traces- Trace length -The backing J. SINKERS -Heavier line materials -Sinkers -Downriggers -Cannonballs K. DIVING DEVICES -Diving boards -Tripping -Diving lures -Trolling depth L. RIGGING FIXED LINES -Making shock absorbers -Rigging shock absorbers -Position -Backing cord and lazy line -Line storage M. RIGGING LINES ON HAND REELS -Loading the reel -Overloading -Adjustments -Using wire N. RIGGING HANDREELS FOR TROLLING -Rigging through a trolling boom -Rabbit line -Boom stays -Braking system (drag) -Lazy line 29 CHAPTER 3: PREPARING TROLLING LINES SECTION A: TOOLS AND UTENSILS Most of the preparation for trolling is normally done on shore before the fishing trip starts. This makes gear rigging easier and more comfortable, prevents new materials being contaminated with salt water before they are used, and avoids wasting time at sea which could better be used in fishing or carrying out other tasks on the boat.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Basics – Fishing Vessels Fishing Vessel Types
    Fishery Basics – Fishing Vessels Fishing Vessel Types Fishing vessels are typically designed with a specific purpose. That purpose is to locate, catch, and preserve fish while out at sea. The planned operations of a vessel determine the overall size of the vessel, the arrangement of the deck, carrying capacity, as well as the machinery and types of equipment that will be supported by the vessel. Due to the inherent differences in fishing communities around the world, there is a wide range of types and styles of fishing vessels. Vessel sizes can range from the 2 m (6 ft) dug out canoes used in subsistence and artisanal fisheries, to factory ships that exceed 130 m (427 ft) in length. Commercial fishing vessels can also be characterized by a variety of criteria: types of fish (See Biology & Ecology) they catch, fishing gear and methods used (See Fishing Gear), capacity and processing capabilities, and the geographical origin of the vessel. In 2002, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) estimated the world fishing fleet had approximately four million vessels, with an average vessel size ranging from 10-15 m (33-49 ft). Based on a quarterly catch statistics report, published by the Pacific Fisheries Information Network (PacFIN), approximately 1,950 vessels landed their catches in California ports. Due to the technological innovations that began in the 1950s, many fishing vessels are now classified as multi-purpose vessels, because of the ability to switch out gear types depending on the targeted species. However, single use vessels still exist in the world fishing fleet today.
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Shrimp Production in Thailand
    A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Shrimp Production in Thailand THE CASE FOR IMPROVED ECONOMICS AND SUSTAINABILITY Boston Consulting Group partners with leaders in business and society to tackle their most important challenges and capture their greatest opportunities. BCG was the pioneer in business strategy when it was founded in 1963. Today, we help clients with total transformation—inspiring complex change, enabling organizations to grow, building competitive advantage, and driving bottom-line impact. To succeed, organizations must blend digital and human capabilities. Our diverse, global teams bring deep industry and functional expertise and a range of perspectives to spark change. BCG delivers solutions through leading-edge management consulting along with technology and design, corporate and digital ventures—and business purpose. We work in a uniquely collaborative model across the firm and throughout all levels of the client organization, generating results that allow our clients to thrive. A STRATEGIC APPROACH TO SUSTAINABLE SHRIMP PRODUCTION IN THAILAND THE CASE FOR IMPROVED ECONOMICS AND SUSTAINABILITY HOLGER RUBEL WENDY WOODS DAVID PÉREZ SHALINI UNNIKRISHNAN ALEXANDER MEYER ZUM FELDE SOPHIE ZIELCKE CHARLOTTE LIDY CAROLIN LANFER July 2019 | Boston Consulting Group CONTENTS 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 MARKET FORCES ARE RESHAPING THE GLOBAL SHRIMP INDUSTRY 8 THE THAI SHRIMP INDUSTRY IS AT AN INFLECTION POINT The Perfect Storm Has Hit Thai Shrimp Production in Recent Years Thailand Is Weathering the Storm but Is Still Losing Ground
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic and Demographic Implications of Aquaculture in White Sturgeon (Acipenser Transmontanus) Conservation
    1733 Genetic and demographic implications of aquaculture in white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) conservation Henriette I. Jager Abstract: This study uses a genetic individual-based model of white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) populations in a river to examine the genetic and demographic trade-offs associated with operating a conservation hatchery. Simula- tion experiments evaluated three management practices: (i) setting quotas to equalize family contributions in an effort to prevent genetic swamping, (ii) an adaptive management scheme that interrupts stocking when introgression exceeds a specified threshold, and (iii) alternative broodstock selection strategies that influence domestication. The first set of simulations, designed to evaluate equalizing the genetic contribution of families, did not show the genetic benefits expected. The second set of simulations showed that simulated adaptive management was not successful in controlling introgression over the long term, especially with uncertain feedback. The third set of simulations compared the effects of three alternative broodstock selection strategies on domestication for hypothetical traits controlling early density-dependent survival. Simulated aquaculture selected for a density-tolerant phenotype when broodstock were taken from a genetically connected population. Using broodstock from an isolated population (i.e., above an upstream barrier or in a different watershed) was more effective at preventing domestication than using wild broodstock from a connected population.
    [Show full text]