DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT for Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances and Associated Permit for fluvial Arctic grayling in the upper Big Hole River, Montana Prepared by: Douglas Peterson Connie Young-Dubovsky U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 100 North Park, Suite 320 P.O. Box 25486 Helena, MT 59601 Denver, CO 80225-0486 Bob Snyder and Martha Williams Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks P.O. Box 200701 Helena, MT 59601 October 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................iii ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED IN THIS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT................................................ iv I. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR TAKING ACTION.................................................................................................... 6 A. Introduction............................................................................................................................................................. 6 B. Purpose and Need.................................................................................................................................................... 8 C. Decision to be Made by the Responsible Official ............................................................................................... 13 D. Issues Raised During Planning ............................................................................................................................ 13 II. ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION ........................................................................... 15 A. Alternative A - NO ACTION ............................................................................................................................... 15 B. Alternative B (Preferred Alternative) - PROPOSED ACTION ....................................................................... 16 C. ALTERNATIVE C – “LIMITED UMBRELLA AGREEMENT” .................................................................. 19 D. Alternatives Eliminated From Consideration .................................................................................................... 20 III. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ............................................................................................................................. 23 A. Introduction........................................................................................................................................................... 23 B. Ecology of Fluvial Arctic Grayling...................................................................................................................... 24 C. Hydrology .............................................................................................................................................................. 29 D. Vegetation .............................................................................................................................................................. 30 E. Wetlands................................................................................................................................................................. 33 F. Fisheries.................................................................................................................................................................. 35 G. Wildlife................................................................................................................................................................... 37 H. Social Considerations ........................................................................................................................................... 38 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ............................................................................................................ 44 A. GENERAL DIFFERENCES AMONG THE ALTERNATIVES..................................................................... 44 B. FLUVIAL ARCTIC GRAYLING ....................................................................................................................... 45 C. HYDROLOGY...................................................................................................................................................... 51 D. VEGETATION ..................................................................................................................................................... 53 E. WETLANDS ........................................................................................................................................................... 55 F. FISHERIES............................................................................................................................................................ 57 G. WILDLIFE............................................................................................................................................................ 61 H. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS .......................................................................................... 63 I. CONSIDERATION OF CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS UNDER THE PROPOSED ACTION ............................................................................................. 70 V. CUMULATIVE EFFECTS...................................................................................................................................... 75 A. FLUVIAL ARCTIC GRAYLING AND OTHER FISH POPULATIONS...................................................... 75 B. HYDROLOGY (Including water quality and quantity) ................................................................................... 77 C. VEGETATION ..................................................................................................................................................... 78 D. WETLANDS.......................................................................................................................................................... 78 E. WILDLIFE ............................................................................................................................................................ 78 F. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS........................................................................................... 79 G. FEDERAL LANDS............................................................................................................................................... 80 H. OTHER PARAMETERS..................................................................................................................................... 86 VI. COMPLIANCE, CONSULTATION, AND COORDINATION WITH OTHERS........................................... 86 A. NEPA COORDINATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION CONDUCTED BY THE AGENCIES.................................................................................................................................................................. 86 B. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE .......................................................................................................................... 88 C. PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT ............................................................................................................... 88 VII. REFERENCES....................................................................................................................................................... 89 VIII. LIST OF APPENDICES...................................................................................................................................... 95 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this Environmental Assessment (EA) is to satisfy the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Montana Environmental Policy Act (Montana EPA) requirements for a proposed action to implement a 20-year umbrella Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances (CCAA/Agreement) with Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks (Montana FWP) (Appendix 1). Through the NEPA process the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) will decide whether to issue Montana FWP a section 10(a)(1)(b) Enhancement of Survival permit (Permit). The Montana FWP will decide through Montana EPA analysis whether to implement the Agreement. The Agreement has been prepared by Montana FWP, with assistance from USDA Natural Resources and Conservation Service (NRCS), Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (Montana DNRC), and the USFWS. The purpose of the Agreement is to promote conservation of Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) in the upper Big Hole River in southwestern Montana. Two other alternatives are compared to the proposed action to assess whether the action causes significant effects to the human environment in the project area. The majority of present and historic fluvial Arctic grayling habitat is located adjacent to non- Federal lands. Therefore, the survival and recovery of the species is closely associated with the current and future land and water uses occurring on the non-Federal lands. The potential for an Endangered Species Act (ESA) listing of fluvial Arctic grayling, which would have economic, legal, and social repercussions for affected individuals; and the large spatial scale at which habitat must be protected and restored has highlighted the need for a more comprehensive, collaborative, and long-term approach to fluvial Arctic grayling conservation in the Big Hole River. Therefore, there is an obvious need
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A HISTORY OP FORT SHAW, MONTANA, from 1867 to 1892. by ANNE M. DIEKHANS SUBMITTED in PARTIAL FULFILLMENT of "CUM LAUDE"
    A HISTORY OP FORT SHAW, MONTANA, FROM 1867 TO 1892. by ANNE M. DIEKHANS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF "CUM LAUDE" RECOGNITION to the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY CARROLL COLLEGE 1959 CARROLL COLLEGE LIBRARY HELENA, MONTANA MONTANA COLLECTION CARROLL COLLEGE LIBRAS/- &-I THIS THESIS FOR "CUM LAUDE RECOGNITION BY ANNE M. DIEKHANS HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY Date ii PREFACE Fort Shaw existed as a military post between the years of 1867 and 1892. The purpose of this thesis is to present the history of the post in its military aspects during that period. Other aspects are included but the emphasis is on the function of Fort Shaw as district headquarters of the United States Army in Montana Territory. I would like to thank all those who assisted me in any way in the writing of this thesis. I especially want to thank Miss Virginia Walton of the Montana Historical Society and the Rev. John McCarthy of the Carroll faculty for their aid and advice in the writing of this thesis. For techni­ cal advice I am indebted to Sister Mary Ambrosia of the Eng­ lish department at Carroll College. I also wish to thank the Rev. James R. White# Mr. Thomas A. Clinch, and Mr. Rich­ ard Duffy who assisted with advice and pictures. Thank you is also in order to Mrs. Shirley Coggeshall of Helena who typed the manuscript. A.M.D. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chggter Page I. GENERAL BACKGROUND............................... 1 II. MILITARY ACTIVITIES............................. 14 Baker Massacre Sioux Campaign The Big Hole Policing Duties Escort and Patrol Duties III.
    [Show full text]
  • BIG HOLE National Battlefield
    BIG HOLE National Battlefield Historical Research Management Plan & Bibliography of the ERCE WAR, 1877 F 737 .B48H35 November 1967 Historical Research Management Plan BIG HOLE NATI ONAL for .BATILEFIELD LI BRP..RY BIG HOLE Na tional Battlefield & Bibliog raphy of the N E Z PERCE WAR, 1877 By AUBREY L. HAINES DIVISION OF HISTORY Office of Archeology and Historic Preservatio.n November 1967 U.S. Department of the Interior NATI ONAL PARK SERVICE HISTORICAL RESEARCH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR BIG HOLE NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD November 1968 Recommended Superintendent Date Reviewed Division of History Date Approved Chief, Office of Archeology Date and Historic Preservation i TABLE OF CONTENTS Historical Research Management Plan Approval Sheet I. The Park Story and Purpose . • • • 1 A. The Main His torical Theme ••••••• 1 B. Sub sidiary Historical Theme • • • • • 1 1 c. Relationship of Historical Themes to Natural History and Anthropology • • • • • • • • 12 D. Statement of Historical Significance •• 14 E. Reasons for Establishment of the Park • • • • • 15 II. Historical Resources of the Battlefield 1 7 A. Tangible Resources • • • • 17 1. Sites and Remains 1 7 a. Those Related to the Main Park Theme • • . 1 7 b. Those Related to Subsidiary Themes • 25 2. Historic Structures 27 B. Intangible Resources • 2 7 c. Other Resources 2 8 III.Status of Research •• 2 9 A. Research Accomplished 29 H. Research in Progress • • • • • 3o c. Cooperation with Non-Service Institutions 36 IV. Research Needs ••••••••••••••••• 37 A. Site Identification and Evaluation Studies 37 H. General Background Studies and Survey Histories 40 c. Studies for Interpretive Development • • • • • 4 1 D. Development Studies • • • • • • • • • 4 1 E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethnography of On-Site Interpretation and Commemoration
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2013 The Ethnography of On-Site Interpretation and Commemoration Practices: Place-Based Cultural Heritages at the Bear Paw, Big Hole, Little Bighorn, and Rosebud Battlefields Helen Alexandra Keremedjiev The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Keremedjiev, Helen Alexandra, "The Ethnography of On-Site Interpretation and Commemoration Practices: Place-Based Cultural Heritages at the Bear Paw, Big Hole, Little Bighorn, and Rosebud Battlefields" (2013). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1009. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1009 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ETHNOGRAPHY OF ON-SITE INTERPRETATION AND COMMEMORATION PRACTICES: PLACE-BASED CULTURAL HERITAGES AT THE BEAR PAW, BIG HOLE, LITTLE BIGHORN, AND ROSEBUD BATTLEFIELDS By HELEN ALEXANDRA KEREMEDJIEV Master of Arts, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 2007 Bachelor of Arts, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, 2004 Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment
    [Show full text]
  • View the 2015 Summer B.O.D. Meeting Minutes
    “On the Trail” NPTF Photo The Quarterly Newsletter of the Nez Perce Trail Foundation • Ocial Partner of the Nez Perce National Historic Trail • Ta’yam (Summer) 2015 President’s Message Dear fellow Nez Perce Trail Foundation members, With the end of summer, it might be a good time to begin planning for 2016. As we look back, the Nez Perce Trail Foundation has experienced a tremendous amount of success relative to our re-organization efforts. The down side of 2015 was that actual “on the trail” improvements and upkeep was at a stand still for several reasons. The worst thing that could happen to the Nez Perce Trail did happen. The fire season of 2015 will not be forgotten for years to come. We have witnessed some of the most disastrous fires throughout the Northwest this year, and the Forest Service resources have been stretched beyond reasonable expectations. The financial strain that has been placed on the U.S. Forest Service will inevitably mean that services, programs, and facilities will be lost or cut back severely. Jim Zimmerman, The USFS is forced to utilize their own budget to combat these annual fires. That is much different than how other President NPTF natural disasters are financially dealt with such as hurricanes, earthquakes, tornados, or floods. Those disasters are funded by way of a completely different procedure and revenue source, and in most cases, involve FEMA. I have personally lobbied House and Senate members to consider funding fire disasters through a separate line item account so that the Forest Service can continue to provide the services and management of our resources as intended.
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Trails
    Sacred Trails “The Land unites us with [our] across time, keeping our culture alive…… We live in the place our ancestors called home before the great pyramids of Egypt were built.” Nez Perce Tribal Executive Committee First Encounter of Horse Nation Native Americans have always believed that animal creatures were part of the living community. When Native Americans first encountered the horse they called them Horse Nation and they found an ally, inspiration and a tool that would transform their world. By the 1800’s Natives had used the horse nation as survival and sustaining their culture. Native Americans honored the horse and invited the horse into their spiritual lives. The horse continued to have a close relationship with the Native Americans. Horse Dominates North America In the 1500’s Spanish Conquistadors used the horse as a powerful weapon to take over the new lands in North America. Some of the horse were captured or ran away and the Native American tamed, trained and blessed the horses into their everyday lives. The horses move across the entire North American continent and become a powerful tool against invaders. By the 1700’s many native tribes had their own horse nation. The horse nation strengthened the native tribes by becoming an integral part of their community and spiritual life. 1 Sacred Trails The Walla Walla Council of 1855 The Walla Walla Council was held on the banks of Mill Creek a tributary of the Walla Walla River. Governor Stevens the Governor of Washington and the Superintendent of Indian Affairs devoted much of his time to setting up councils between the tribes of Washington Territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Hole National Battlefield Brochure and Map
    After the Battle of Big Hole When I walk the battlefi eld it’s sacred ground. A lot of relatives are buried there, but the memories of them are still living on. We are here today because of them. Their love for us lives in my heart. —?ıpelıkítemucet (Frank Andrews) Nez Perce camp at Big Hole Battlefi eld 1877 © CHUCK HANEY THE FLIGHT After the battle at Big Hole, the nımí.pu. ered fl owers and grass. Those leaves are enough already. General Miles had promised he got it by the destruction of our people. had to do with where they placed us. The fl ed. Each time the military caught up, they dead, those fl owers are dead. This tells of the that we might return to our own country. We who yesterday were rich are beggars interpreter asked us, ‘Where you want to go? escaped. “Every day was struggling,” said end of fi ghting. Soon we are to be attacked I thought we could start again. I believed today. We have no country, no people, no Lapwai and be Christian, or Colville and just kulkulsiyeké.t (Matthew Whitfi eld). “Fighting for the last time. Guns will be laid down.” General Miles, or I never would have surren- home.” He and over 250 others made it to be yourself?’ No other question was asked and hurrying on. Faint for food; tired with the dered. He could not have made any other Canada and safety. us. Chief [Young] Joseph was not given hard traveling. Little children, some of THE LAST BATTLE terms with me at that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Documents Relating to American Indians in Montana
    Guide to Documents Relating to American Indians in Montana Identified and Collected by the Natives of Montana Archival Project (NOMAP) From Repositories in the National Archives and Records Administration, Smithsonian Institution & Library of Congress 2008-10 Helen Cryer (Saddle Lake Cree, ’08) Miranda McCarvel (’08-10) Carole Meyers (Oneida/Seneca/Blackfeet) (’10) Wilena Old Person (Blackfeet/Yakama, ’08-09) Glen Still Smoking Jr. (Blackfeet, ’08) Eli Suzukovich III (Cree, ’08) Richmond Clow (’10) David Beck, faculty advisor to project Steve McCann, Digital Projects Librarian Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………..... 2 National Archives and Records Administration, Washington D.C. …........ 3 Record Group 75 Records of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) .... 3 Record Group 94, Records of the Adjutant General’s Office ……… 5 Record Group 217 Records of the Accounting Officers of the. Department of Treasury …………………………………...... 7 Record Group 393, Records of the U.S. Army Continental Commands, 1821-1920 ……………………………………... 7 National Archives and Records Administration, College Park, Maryland 8 Smithsonian Institution, National Anthropological Archives …………..... 9 NAA Manuscripts …………………………………………………. 9 NAA Audiotapes, Drawings, Films, Photographs and Prints ……... 20 Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of the American Indian Archives …………………………………………………….. 23 Library of Congress ……………………………………………………….. 26 Appendix 1: Key Word Index ...…………………………………………… 27 Appendix 2: Record Group 75 Entry 91 Letters Received Index …………. 41 1 Introduction This is a guide to primary source documents relating to Indians in Montana that are located in Washington D.C. These documents have been identified and in some cases digitized by teams of University of Montana students sponsored by the American Indian Programs of the National Museum of Natural History of the Smithsonian Institution and the UM Mansfield Library.
    [Show full text]
  • NEZ PERCE ...Through the Big Hole, Horse Prairie and Lemhi Valleys -1877
    Auto Tour the plight op The NEZ PERCE ...through the Big Hole, Horse Prairie and Lemhi Valleys -1877 United States Forest Beaverhead-Deerlodge Department of Service National Agriculture Forest n August 1877, the tranquility of the Big Hole Valley was shattered by the sound of gunfire as a battle erupted between J five bands of Nez Perce Indians and U.S. military forces along the banks of the Big Hole River. For valley settlers, anxiety turned to fear and concern as nearly 800 Nez Perce men, woman and children gathered their wounded and fled southward towards Skinner Meadows and the country beyond. Today, you can retrace the route used by the Nez Perce and their military pursuers. This brochure describes the Nez Perce (Nee- Me-Poo) National Historic Trail between Big Hole National Batttlefield, Montana and Leadore, Idaho. The map shows the auto tour route in detail. Auto Tour Route - This designated auto route stays on all-weather roads and allows you to experience the Nez Perce Trail from a distance. The auto tour route is passable for all types of vehicles. An alternative route exists from Lost Trail Pass on the Montana/Idaho border south to Salmon and Leadore, Idaho along Hwy. 93 and 28. Adventure Route - For those seeking the most authentic historic route, a rough two lane road, connects Jackson, Montana and the Horse Prairie Valley. Examine the map carefully and watch for signs. You may want to take a more detailed Forest Map. The adventure route is usually passable from July to October. It is not recommended for motor homes or vehicles towing trailers.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California
    UC Riverside UC Riverside Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title "Something Terrible Happened Here": Memory and Battlefield Preservation in the Construction of Race, Place, and Nation Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1sq4w4cb Author Hall, Susan Chase Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE “Something Terrible Happened Here” Memory and Battlefield Preservation in the Construction of Race, Place, and Nation A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History by Susan Chase Hall March 2013 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Catherine Gudis, Chairperson Dr. Molly McGarry Dr. Rebecca Kugel Copyright by Susan Chase Hall 2013 The Dissertation of Susan Chase Hall is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation has been made possible thanks to a number of individuals and institutions. Without their support, guidance, and let’s face it, funding, this research would not have come to fruition! To the faculty and staff of UC Riverside’s History Department: thank you for all you have done to help me out over the last eight years. From assigning deep, thought- provoking readings that changed my world-view to writing last-minute letters of recommendation, you have all been there to push me, support me, and vouch for my credentials as an academic and public historian. Catherine Gudis and Molly McGarry, you inspired me inside and outside of the classroom, encouraging me to open my eyes and mind to a new and theoretical way of exploring Public History.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Wars.8-98.P65
    A Guide to the Microfiche Edition of Research Collections in Native American Studies The Indian Wars of the West and Frontier Army Life, 18621898 Official Histories and Personal Narratives UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA A Guide to the Microfiche Edition of THE INDIAN WARS OF THE WEST AND FRONTIER ARMY LIFE, 1862–1898 Official Histories and Personal Narratives Project Editor and Guide Compiled by: Robert E. Lester A microfiche project of UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA An Imprint of CIS 4520 East-West Highway • Bethesda, MD 20814-3389 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Indian wars of the West and frontier army life, 1862–1898 [microform] : official histories and personal narratives / project editor, Robert E. Lester microfiche. Accompanied by a printed guide compiled by Robert E. Lester, entitled: A guide to the microfiche edition of The Indian wars of the West and frontier army life, 1862–1898. ISBN 1-55655-598-9 (alk. paper) 1. Indians of North America--Wars--1862–1865--Sources. 2. Indians of North America--Wars--1866–1895--Sources. 3. United States. Army--Military life--History--19th century--Sources. 4. West (U.S.)--History--19th century--Sources. I. Lester, Robert. II. University Publications of America (Firm) III. Title: Guide to the microfilm edition of The Indian wars of the West and frontier army life, 1862–1898. [E81] 978'.02—dc21 98-12605 CIP Copyright © 1998 by University Publications of America. All rights reserved. ISBN 1-55655-598-9. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope and Content Note ................................................................................................. v Arrangement of Material .................................................................................................. ix List of Contributing Institutions ..................................................................................... xi Source Note .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Beaverhead Range Beaverhead Mountains Became Part of the Boundary Are Part of an Immensely Thick Sequence of 1.4 Billion-Year-Old (Middle Between the Two Territories
    Beaverhead Mountains ©Photos by Jeff Lonn, All Rights Reserved Lonn, ©Photos by Jeff Montana Geology 2012 January July Su M T W Th F S Su M T W Th F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 29 30 31 February August Su M T W Th F S Su M T W Th F S 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 26 27 28 29 30 31 March September Su M T W Th F S Su M T W Th F S 1 2 3 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 April October Su M T W Th F S Su M T W Th F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 29 30 28 29 30 31 May November Su M T W Th F S Su M T W Th F S 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 27 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 June December Su M T W Th F S Su M T W Th F S 1 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Butte Offi ce Billings Offi ce 1300 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Hole Battlefield
    Top of monument to Chief Joseph, Big Hole Battlefield BIG HOLE BATTLEFIELD NATIONAL MONUMENT MONTANA bloodshed had it not been for the grow­ homes. Captain Rawn's force returned grey-tinged streamers of dawn found the Leaving a force of their warriors to BIG HOLE BATTLEFIELD ing feeling on the part of the Indians to Fort Missoula to await reinforcements. entire command within a few yards of continue the siege, most of the Indians NATIONAL MONUMENT that the whites failed to punish their The Nez Perce Indians traveled leis­ the camp, only the shallow river sep­ returned to the village. General Gibbon own people for alleged misdeeds. Some urely, trading with the settlers, secure arating them. wrote: "Few of us will soon forget the United States Department of the Interior of the young warriors, ignoring the in the belief that the agreement they Natalekin, an old Indian, arose and wail of mingled grief, rage, and horror authority of their chiefs, went forth on Harold L. Ickes, Secretary had concluded at Lo Lo Creek meant the started toward the horse herd and, un­ which came from the camp four or five their own to punish the whites, thus cessation of hostilities. They arrived at aware of their presence, approached to hundred yards from us when the National Park Service, Newton B. Drury, Director precipitating the movements of troops their old camp-ground on the Big Hole within a few yards of the advancing Indians returned to it and recognized against these "Non-Treaty" Indians. River, August 7, 1877. whites. He was shot, and this was the their slaughtered warriors, women, and The Big Hole Battlefield National of their retreat until their capture within Gen.
    [Show full text]