DOCSLIB.ORG

Related Searches Wife Big Hole

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Related Searches Wife Big Hole big hole mt - Bing Images 1/17/15 9:41 AM WE..B VIDEO MAPS NFWS fv10R S n c big hole mt Related searches Wife Big Hole Big Vagaina Hole Big Holes in the Earth Big Hole in the Ground Big Holes in Water Big Hole River Huge Hole Big Hole Hole in Yard Wide Hole Small Hole Big Hole Battlefield http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=big+hole+mt&qpvt=big+hole+ ... il&id=A9A28E4890915F4A9789EE972FBC8A5748F63CA7&selectedlndex=O Page 1of2 Wisdom Post Office, Wisdom, MT - Google Maps 8/25/13 2:26 PM To see all the details that are visible on the screen, use the "Prinf' link next to the map. ~~ f/-h- ~ s. 111~ ~.] https://maps.google.com/ Page 1of2 out of danger. Looking Glass did not post As the slege continued, The milltary's losses guards. Unknown to the Nez Peu.e. a se(· ~ome of the Nei Perce war­ were also high, wll ond mllitary force-Hi2 men of the 7th riors began wllhdrawlng lo help Chief 2!1 dead and 40 U.S. Infantry out of Fort Shaw and four Joseph dnd others to care for the injured, wour1ded, but the other WC$lern Montana forts 1.mder the bury the dead. gather their horses. and soldiers knew that they had greatly tommand of Col. John Gibbon-had joined break camp. Others remained to keep the damaged the figh ting ability and th~ th• (hase and w;u advancing toward them. soldiers under fire while the Nnz Perce morale of the Nez Perce people. D«>· families headed south. leaving much of ~p l te the tragi~ events that occurred n the $vmmer of 1877 five band$ or Glbbon·s scouts spotted the Nez Perce women. and children were shot lndlscrim· their belonging~ and mariy of their dead on the battlefield, both sides demon· Nez Perce lndlan5 consisting of 800 t!pls on the afternoon of August 8. Before inately. The soldiers soM occupied rhe behind. Finally, on August 10, In the early strated acts of heroism and human I people, .inc;ludlng 250 warriors, began dawn on the 9th most of the soldiers and upper erid of thll camp, while the Nez morning of the second day ol fighting, the kfndr:iess. Seven enllsted men were a 1, 170·mlle 1ourney from northeastern 34 ci vilian volunteers were forming a skir­ Perce warriors, urged on t/y Chiefs Look· remaining warriors fired parting shots and awarded ·the Congressional Meclal of Oregon and t entral Idaho over the Bitter• mish line behind a screen of wlllow brush Ing Glass and White Bird, qutckly took left to Join their people. The battle was fiono1, and those officers who <urvlved root Mount<1ins and thfough the Montana along the west bank of lhl!! North fork of de1ensive positions and prepared a coun• over. received brevet promotions. For many Territory. Though they were herding more the Big Hole River. w1 thin 200 yards of the terattack. Their di:1adly shooting eventu of the soldiers and volunteers the hor­ than 2,000 horses and carrying whatever Nu Perce camp. Here they waited tensely ally forced Gibbon's men to retre.at back General Howard's 1roops arrived the •neKt rors of what they had ~en at the Bat· posse,.ions they could manage, the Nez for first light to attack. The attack started across the r1ver to a point of pines pro· day and found Colonel Gibbon wounded tie of the Big Hole would haunt them Perce made this long and difficult trek in prematurely, however. when a Nez Perce jecting from Batth~ Mountain. In the llm· and his command out of action. In a mili­ for the rest of their lives. less than four months. United States Army named Natalekin went out to check his ber the troops dug m for a siege and were tary sense the Nez Perce had won the bat· troops under Gen Oliver 0 . HowMd had horses and stumbled onto the concealed pinned down for the next 24 hours lie, but the "victory• was a hollow one. orders to place the f ive non-treaty bands •old1ers and volun1ee<S, who shot and S"ty to nmety members o f the tribe had of Nez Oerce on a small ruervation in cen· killed him. Wt en the troops "ossed the During the attack, some of Gibbon's men been killed Only about thirty of these tral Idaho, The Nel Perce had hoped to river and fired Into the village, some of had been struggling to haul a l2·pounder w ere warriors; the rest were women, chil· l!'1~~~~=~:Jti~~mo~:.~r. elude the soldiers, but they were forced the Nez Perce scallered quid<ly while mouritaln howitzer through the der>se pren, old peopl':\'. The Nel. Perce now NH P"rce WMflOI who di:rlv-ed hi~ ""d i"<lP'lf: '1orn tlie wound ha ·rec4?lYod 10 stop and face theor pursuers several ot hers were s1ow to awaken. In the co n· lodge-pole pine forest. lhey managed to (eallzed the w ar was not over and they times. The battle with t he highest number fusion of tho ·f.,int pre dawn light, men, place It on the hillside above the siege rn us1 flee !or their l i ve ~. ~n:;~~~~t~T;.w.!~~1!~ . !!~~d,::;v.d .I ~t Pet<e h~ 'lout'1d d.fad at. th~ •U9 Hole. .... o1 <a ~uillties during t his epic odyssey took area just as the so1- His fJigurin were 1(): women. 21 dill.. l 1 place in tile Big Hole Valley of so t1 thwest· ____ dhm wi>re dig· d,..n;, aod 1~ men for a to·tw1of63. ern Montana. The Baille of the 819 H<>ie 91ng in. The crew was a tragic tur11 i'1$J point of whiat came fired two round• to be c11 lled the Nez Perce Wor of 1877. I ~~~o~~r~ Jl~~~~e of The Nez P11rce arrived in the lush Big Hole men, galloping for V<l liey on the morning of August 7, and w brd, captured the their trail leader, Chief Looking Glass, I gun, dismantled it, chose .:in old camp site at w hich to set up and scattered its their tipis. Bellevmg that they were far BIG H 0 L f. NAT1CNA\ parts.. enough ahead of Howard's soldiers to be I H A 1 T 1 I' F I f. L IJ llig Hole National Battlefield Tocfoy About Your V1s1t 81(1 Ho1e Nvt1onol Bantt Nu Perce Camp The boi Howlttc, C.\lpturci sa~ 819 Hol~ NiHtona! S~u ­ the nai1onol baulcfield ncfd merr1onall(t'\ lhtl tlebe9ant1e1ewtlcnwt Tht .stw1J 11o.. •allc uµ rn hto tleft.f'ld l\ to rmlt!s we'\l M ont,:1111& law~ apply ln f'lez Perre m'l'fl, womer1. dtN''i surprised ,he ~k~p.. s1tewhare-Nez Pen" war o! Wi~dc:un, MOM., on 1he nahonal forn$t. anrl ttiildnrn, tf)1" :kOkllNs Jno NN P'('i(l!' Like 0th.et• I f)Ol"I. C:ltpH.Jrt•<.1 Ciibt)'On•o1, Munt 43 from Butte. H1J1nt109 and ·hs.hln9 on af thc'?tltU ..> . lr1J,,mtr)'. tribat p.l.lCI?!. ~ rt 1dal10. WMI'\ hQwit~N takes .o11bout .•w Mom .• u1;h;c 1.1s south pt 1v.o.tte land 11 by per il'ld tti.e 81tt'"''OO~ V(l)Un 11'11J'Hn'\ .and Oregon. U'lil'\ 1T1fn1>.1tu10; af'ld pro•.. ldto5 a WP.11 to Divide. then to tnission onl)i' t~~n.: who d;ish""d ,a th ij1e• r~ Sdt:r~-· cf Gm,md It spet.t.,(•.ilar view of th W•WOtn on Mom 43. eauJe tif the Big H•J I ~ sym't>ol1ze11 he ~ttenqth battlt•flcld JJnd 1he Bfq .and Jei•llt Qf t.Ju.• · ezPierce.. ifoleV..:illey from ihe we1t, Mont F"uef, food, and lod'g ~n l etS(!;cu Stop flm ot thr Yl'\ltor rind servt!"'. &)) a temir1dN 43 u is . 9l a t 1n9- oltho1..19k f1m1 t ~d ~ tf•t1tf',, Wht(h 0\f<'t)t}Q\'-" ol their hf'd\IY to~'S ill A Word of caution Coy th~ StAle> line b-etwePn Coi:lr"I bt' found m nedrby the battlCifteld A 26·mfn thett\trUg<Jteforfrl.'-f!d:om 01e. deer. elk. moose, S01lmor\ l lJ~1ho, nd Wisdpm Moracomplote utt v,d{!(l ptoouun .md •) A 9uidl" bot~let to lhf'I .\'Jnd o ther an 11 ndli. n.t11v~ tl;Jm•lton, Mont from ser-.1kes aft! available In mm~um o, plloto91.1phs Ncl ~tCP. C.lf"l'J) Is ._fVJll DiUoo, t.1ka- I t5 south a\ru·c t>r Odlot\ Mont ~ lluOt.:lti.om. ~od pl;'rsonal ablealM-!J ttte tr.11) J ~~ !h~,~=~~:r~:.a;;';!~! thr-ee m1fo~ to thtii Wis ~ to Ute eai.t. itr!d Hnm\1.­ item" beloo91ng lo wri.,e d.lngero\.JS 11 uartl'd Ot dom e•1t.. then to W1o; .. ton, Mont or SiiJmon c>f lhe b.>ttll"'J].Mt1(ip.u.nU. SIC9 f!! A19a The «>ld;ie~ I ~ppro~cht::d 'oo clo,ttly. dorn on Highway 278. Idaho, to he west prov1d oncntation to were -bf!Stcgcd here fot Alw<Jys keep a -safe dl~ - then we:1.i on Mont- 43. the pcuJ.; Md its ~tofV nt31ly za hours The 1~n"e Peh cite riot at· for Mort Informat ion fheroe 1;'cll)Q.O'Mtlt"!-J1tlti 1 10 ..·;ed ori t.r•1ti or u' the Th.etc arf!' olmi<.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Big Hole River Fluvial Arctic Grayling
    FLUVIAL ARCTIC GRAYLING MONITORING REPORT 2003 James Magee and Peter Lamothe Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks Dillon, Montana Submitted To: Fluvial Arctic Grayling Workgroup And Beaverhead National Forest Bureau of Land Management Montana Chapter, American Fisheries Society Montana Council, Trout Unlimited Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service June 2004 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The following individuals and organizations contributed valuable assistance to the project in 2003. Scott Lula, Greg Gibbons, Zachary Byram, Tracy Elam, Tim Mosolf, and Dick Oswald of Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (FWP), provided able field assistance. Ken Staigmiller (FWP) collected samples for disease testing. Ken McDonald (FWP), provided administrative support, chaired the Fluvial Arctic Grayling Workgroup, reviewed progress reports and assisted funding efforts. Bob Snyder provided support as Native Species Coordinator. Dick Oswald (FWP) provided technical advice and expertise. Bruce Rich (FWP) provided direction as regional fisheries supervisor. Jim Brammer, Dennis Havig, Dan Downing, and Chris Riley (USFS) assisted with funding, provided housing for FWP technicians, and assisted with fieldwork. Bill Krise, and Ron Zitzow, Matt Toner, and the staff of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Bozeman Fish Technology Center maintained the brood reserve stock and transported grayling to the upper Ruby River. Jack Boyce, Mark Kornick and Jim Drissell, and crew of Big Springs Hatchery assisted with egg takes at Axolotl and Green Hollow II brood lakes, and transported eyed grayling eggs for RSI use in the upper Ruby River and to Bluewater State Fish Hatchery for rearing reaches. Gary Shaver, Bob Braund, and Dave Ellis from Bluewater State Hatchery raised and transported grayling to the Ruby River and the Missouri Headwaters restoration reaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Montana Arctic
    Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Montana Arctic Grayling Restoration August 2007 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING among: MONTANA FISH, WILDLIFE & PARKS (FWP) U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT (BLM) U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS) U.S. FOREST SERVICE (USFS) MONTANA COUNCIL TROUT UNLIMITED (TU) MONTANA CHAPTER AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY (AFS) YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK (YNP) MONTANA ARCTIC GRAYLING RECOVERY PROGRAM (AGRP) USDA NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION (DNRC) concerning MONTANA ARCTIC GRAYLING RESTORATION BACKGROUND Montana’s Arctic grayling Thymallus arcticus is a unique native species that comprises an important component of Montana’s history and natural heritage. Fluvial (river dwelling) Arctic grayling were once widespread in the Missouri River drainage, but currently wild grayling persist only in the Big Hole River, representing approximately 4% of their native range in Montana. Native lacustrine/adfluvial populations historically distributed in the Red Rock drainage and possibly the Big Hole drainage have also been reduced in abundance and distribution. Arctic grayling have a long history of being petitioned for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Most recently (in April 2007) the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) determined that listing of Arctic grayling in Montana under ESA was not warranted because it does not constitute a distinct population segment as defined by the ESA. On May 15th 2007, the Center for Biological Diversity announced its 60-day Intent to Sue the USFWS regarding the recent grayling decision. The Montana Arctic Grayling Recovery Program (AGRP) was formed in 1987 following declines in the Big Hole River Arctic grayling population, and over concerns for the Red Rock population.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruby River Access Sites Secured by Bruce Farling Hen the Topic of Stream Access Families, There Would Be No Formal Fishing Ago
    SPRING TROUT LINE 2016 Newsletter from the Montana Council of Trout Unlimited Ruby River access sites secured by Bruce Farling hen the topic of stream access families, there would be no formal fishing ago. Because of budget constraints, and the Ruby River is raised access sites for 40-plus river miles below some caused by limits imposed by Win Montana it’s often related the Vigilante Fishing Access Site a couple the Legislature, as well as demands at to absentee landowner James Cox miles downstream of the Ruby River Dam. some of the other 330 sites in FWP’s Kennedy from Atlanta and his 15-year Three county bridge popular fishing access legal and political efforts to prevent the rights-of-way provide site program, the public from accessing this great fishery. the only other points department didn’t However, not all stories about stream of access on the lower have adequate funding access coming from the Ruby Valley river. But the bridges to renew the leases for are as distressing as the Kennedy tale. have limited parking. the previous agreed Recently we can thank some civic-minded Plus, Mr. Kennedy upon price. The ranchers and, in part, Montana TU and has contested bridge Doornbos, Barnosky three of its chapters for a bit of good access in court and and Guillame families, news about the Ruby. made getting to the however, graciously Since the mid-1990s, three long- river at those spots agreed to lease the time ranching families in the valley have physically difficult access sites at a much- been leasing portions of their properties with his fencing schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • A HISTORY OP FORT SHAW, MONTANA, from 1867 to 1892. by ANNE M. DIEKHANS SUBMITTED in PARTIAL FULFILLMENT of "CUM LAUDE"
    A HISTORY OP FORT SHAW, MONTANA, FROM 1867 TO 1892. by ANNE M. DIEKHANS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF "CUM LAUDE" RECOGNITION to the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY CARROLL COLLEGE 1959 CARROLL COLLEGE LIBRARY HELENA, MONTANA MONTANA COLLECTION CARROLL COLLEGE LIBRAS/- &-I THIS THESIS FOR "CUM LAUDE RECOGNITION BY ANNE M. DIEKHANS HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY Date ii PREFACE Fort Shaw existed as a military post between the years of 1867 and 1892. The purpose of this thesis is to present the history of the post in its military aspects during that period. Other aspects are included but the emphasis is on the function of Fort Shaw as district headquarters of the United States Army in Montana Territory. I would like to thank all those who assisted me in any way in the writing of this thesis. I especially want to thank Miss Virginia Walton of the Montana Historical Society and the Rev. John McCarthy of the Carroll faculty for their aid and advice in the writing of this thesis. For techni­ cal advice I am indebted to Sister Mary Ambrosia of the Eng­ lish department at Carroll College. I also wish to thank the Rev. James R. White# Mr. Thomas A. Clinch, and Mr. Rich­ ard Duffy who assisted with advice and pictures. Thank you is also in order to Mrs. Shirley Coggeshall of Helena who typed the manuscript. A.M.D. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chggter Page I. GENERAL BACKGROUND............................... 1 II. MILITARY ACTIVITIES............................. 14 Baker Massacre Sioux Campaign The Big Hole Policing Duties Escort and Patrol Duties III.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2021 Meeting Minutes
    Big Hole Watershed Committee Monthly Meeting Minutes June 16th, 2021 – 7:00 pm at the Divide Grange Zoom option also provided In Attendance In-person: Pedro Marques, BHWC; Tana Nulph, BHWC; Ben LaPorte, BHWC; Jarrett Payne, MFWP; Jim Hagenbarth, Rancher/BHWC; Max Hanson, UM/BHWC Intern; Paul Cleary, Resident/BHWC; Sandy Cleary, Resident; Matt Norberg, DNRC; Betty Bowler, Resident; Tom Bowler, Resident; Hans Humbert, Rancher/BHWC; Randy Smith, Rancher/BHWC; Jim Dennehy, Butte-Silver Bow Water Dept./BHWC; Thomas Woolf, MFWP; Scott Reynolds, Resident; Steve Luebeck, Sportsman/BHWC; and John Reinhardt, Rancher/BHWC. Zoom: Charley (no last name given); Chris Edgington, MTU; and Paul Siddoway. Meeting Minutes BHWC monthly meetings are now held at the Divide Grange with a virtual (Zoom) option provided thanks to Southern Montana Telephone Company, who donated the internet service. Meeting minutes and recordings are available at https://bhwc.org/monthly-meetings/ (scroll down for meeting minutes archive). Printed copies are available during in-person meetings. Contact Tana Nulph, BHWC Associate Director, at [email protected] or (406) 267-3421 to suggest additions or corrections. Reports Streamflow/Snowpack Report as of June 16, 2021 – Matt Norberg, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation • Streamflows: Streamflows in the Big Hole River have generally been below to well below average since the start of April. The bulk of the snowpack has melted off and the river peaked earlier and lower than normal. Daily average flows for this time of year are well below normal Big Hole Watershed Committee, 2021 Page 1 levels with most of the gages reporting streamflow’s well below the 25th percentile with some even below the 10th percentile.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson River at Three Forks, Montana
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT JEFFERSON RIVER AT THREE FORKS, MONTANA Prepared by U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, OMAHA, NEBRASKA December 1971 Jefferson River at Three Forks, Montana ( ) Draft (X) Final Environmental Statement Responsible Office: U.S. Army Engineer District, Omaha, Nebraska 1. Name of Action: (x) Administrative ( ) Legislative 2. Description of Action: The proposed project would consist of the construction of an earth filled levee and a drainage collector ditch approximately lU ,700 feet in length along the northwest side of a small community. The location is at Three Forks in Gallatin County, Montana. 3. a. Environmental Impacts; Flood protection would be provided for a flood having a frequency of occurrence of once in a 100 years. A 28 acre loss of alternate land use would be required for levee alignment. A possibilit would exist for pollutants from adjacent land to accumulate in the collector ditch. A potential would exist for the collector ditch to develop aquatic growth. Five hundred feet of shelterbelt would be lost to levee construction. b. Adverse Environmental Effects: Construction would effect the removal of 28 acres of land from alternative land use; collector ditch could act as a collector of pollutants; and construction of the levee would necessitate the removal of 500 feet of shelterbelt. Alternatives; Floodplain zoning, evacuation, flood proofing, reservoir construction, channel improvement, and ”no development” were considered. 5• Comments Received: City of Three Forks Bureau of Sport Fisheries & Wildlife, USDI Montana Department of Fish Bureau of Reclamation, USDI and Game Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, USDI Montana Department of Health Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA Montana Highway Commission Bureau of Mines, USDI Soil Conservation Service, USDA Montana Water Resources Board National Park Service, USDI 6.
    [Show full text]
  • BIG HOLE National Battlefield
    BIG HOLE National Battlefield Historical Research Management Plan & Bibliography of the ERCE WAR, 1877 F 737 .B48H35 November 1967 Historical Research Management Plan BIG HOLE NATI ONAL for .BATILEFIELD LI BRP..RY BIG HOLE Na tional Battlefield & Bibliog raphy of the N E Z PERCE WAR, 1877 By AUBREY L. HAINES DIVISION OF HISTORY Office of Archeology and Historic Preservatio.n November 1967 U.S. Department of the Interior NATI ONAL PARK SERVICE HISTORICAL RESEARCH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR BIG HOLE NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD November 1968 Recommended Superintendent Date Reviewed Division of History Date Approved Chief, Office of Archeology Date and Historic Preservation i TABLE OF CONTENTS Historical Research Management Plan Approval Sheet I. The Park Story and Purpose . • • • 1 A. The Main His torical Theme ••••••• 1 B. Sub sidiary Historical Theme • • • • • 1 1 c. Relationship of Historical Themes to Natural History and Anthropology • • • • • • • • 12 D. Statement of Historical Significance •• 14 E. Reasons for Establishment of the Park • • • • • 15 II. Historical Resources of the Battlefield 1 7 A. Tangible Resources • • • • 17 1. Sites and Remains 1 7 a. Those Related to the Main Park Theme • • . 1 7 b. Those Related to Subsidiary Themes • 25 2. Historic Structures 27 B. Intangible Resources • 2 7 c. Other Resources 2 8 III.Status of Research •• 2 9 A. Research Accomplished 29 H. Research in Progress • • • • • 3o c. Cooperation with Non-Service Institutions 36 IV. Research Needs ••••••••••••••••• 37 A. Site Identification and Evaluation Studies 37 H. General Background Studies and Survey Histories 40 c. Studies for Interpretive Development • • • • • 4 1 D. Development Studies • • • • • • • • • 4 1 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper and North Fork Big Hole River Watershed Restoration Plan
    Big Hole River, Montana Watershed Restoration Plan Part I: Upper & North Fork Big Hole Watershed Produced by: Big Hole Watershed Committee November 1, 2012 Big Hole Watershed Committee PO Box 21 Divide, Montana 59727 website: bhwc.org Produced with Funds and Support from: Montana Department of Environmental Quality 319 Program Helena, Montana Big Hole River Watershed Restoration Plan - November 1, 2012 Part I: Upper & North Fork Big Hole River Watershed Page | 2 Table of Contents Tables ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 Figures ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Project Area .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Purpose ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 Watershed Restoration Planning ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Fishing Regulations
    MONTANA FISHING REGULATIONS 20March 1, 2018 — F1ebruary 828, 2019 Fly fishing the Missouri River. Photo by Jason Savage For details on how to use these regulations, see page 2 fwp.mt.gov/fishing With your help, we can reduce poaching. MAKE THE CALL: 1-800-TIP-MONT FISH IDENTIFICATION KEY If you don’t know, let it go! CUTTHROAT TROUT are frequently mistaken for Rainbow Trout (see pictures below): 1. Turn the fish over and look under the jaw. Does it have a red or orange stripe? If yes—the fish is a Cutthroat Trout. Carefully release all Cutthroat Trout that cannot be legally harvested (see page 10, releasing fish). BULL TROUT are frequently mistaken for Brook Trout, Lake Trout or Brown Trout (see below): 1. Look for white edges on the front of the lower fins. If yes—it may be a Bull Trout. 2. Check the shape of the tail. Bull Trout have only a slightly forked tail compared to the lake trout’s deeply forked tail. 3. Is the dorsal (top) fin a clear olive color with no black spots or dark wavy lines? If yes—the fish is a Bull Trout. Carefully release Bull Trout (see page 10, releasing fish). MONTANA LAW REQUIRES: n All Bull Trout must be released immediately in Montana unless authorized. See Western District regulations. n Cutthroat Trout must be released immediately in many Montana waters. Check the district standard regulations and exceptions to know where you can harvest Cutthroat Trout. NATIVE FISH Westslope Cutthroat Trout Species of Concern small irregularly shaped black spots, sparse on belly Average Size: 6”–12” cutthroat slash— spots
    [Show full text]
  • Knowing Yellowstone
    Knowing Yellowstone Science in America’s First National Park Jerry Johnson, Editor Cover Photo: A Storm Ripping Through the Valley, Trey Ratcliff DESIGN/LAYOUT/PRODUCTION – Monica Chodkiewicz ISBN 978-1-58979-522-8 Published by Taylor Trade Publishing An imprint of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 http://www.rlpgtrade.com Estover Road, Plymouth PL6 7PY, United Kingdom Distributed by National Book Network Copyright © 2010 by Jerry Johnson All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992. Printed in the United States of America Knowing Yellowstone Science in America’s First National Park Jerry Johnson, Editor iv Knowing Yellowstone: Science in America’s First National Park Acknowledgments: Many people are involved in the evolution and eventual publication of a book. The authors of the chapters that follow willingly took time from busy field seasons and research programs to deliver their highly technical work in a format accessible to those who are not immersed in the world of doing science. I thank them for their good work. Several individuals supported this project from the start.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethnography of On-Site Interpretation and Commemoration
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2013 The Ethnography of On-Site Interpretation and Commemoration Practices: Place-Based Cultural Heritages at the Bear Paw, Big Hole, Little Bighorn, and Rosebud Battlefields Helen Alexandra Keremedjiev The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Keremedjiev, Helen Alexandra, "The Ethnography of On-Site Interpretation and Commemoration Practices: Place-Based Cultural Heritages at the Bear Paw, Big Hole, Little Bighorn, and Rosebud Battlefields" (2013). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1009. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1009 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ETHNOGRAPHY OF ON-SITE INTERPRETATION AND COMMEMORATION PRACTICES: PLACE-BASED CULTURAL HERITAGES AT THE BEAR PAW, BIG HOLE, LITTLE BIGHORN, AND ROSEBUD BATTLEFIELDS By HELEN ALEXANDRA KEREMEDJIEV Master of Arts, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 2007 Bachelor of Arts, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts, 2004 Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment
    [Show full text]
  • View the 2015 Summer B.O.D. Meeting Minutes
    “On the Trail” NPTF Photo The Quarterly Newsletter of the Nez Perce Trail Foundation • Ocial Partner of the Nez Perce National Historic Trail • Ta’yam (Summer) 2015 President’s Message Dear fellow Nez Perce Trail Foundation members, With the end of summer, it might be a good time to begin planning for 2016. As we look back, the Nez Perce Trail Foundation has experienced a tremendous amount of success relative to our re-organization efforts. The down side of 2015 was that actual “on the trail” improvements and upkeep was at a stand still for several reasons. The worst thing that could happen to the Nez Perce Trail did happen. The fire season of 2015 will not be forgotten for years to come. We have witnessed some of the most disastrous fires throughout the Northwest this year, and the Forest Service resources have been stretched beyond reasonable expectations. The financial strain that has been placed on the U.S. Forest Service will inevitably mean that services, programs, and facilities will be lost or cut back severely. Jim Zimmerman, The USFS is forced to utilize their own budget to combat these annual fires. That is much different than how other President NPTF natural disasters are financially dealt with such as hurricanes, earthquakes, tornados, or floods. Those disasters are funded by way of a completely different procedure and revenue source, and in most cases, involve FEMA. I have personally lobbied House and Senate members to consider funding fire disasters through a separate line item account so that the Forest Service can continue to provide the services and management of our resources as intended.
    [Show full text]