Knowing Yellowstone

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Knowing Yellowstone Knowing Yellowstone Science in America’s First National Park Jerry Johnson, Editor Cover Photo: A Storm Ripping Through the Valley, Trey Ratcliff DESIGN/LAYOUT/PRODUCTION – Monica Chodkiewicz ISBN 978-1-58979-522-8 Published by Taylor Trade Publishing An imprint of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 http://www.rlpgtrade.com Estover Road, Plymouth PL6 7PY, United Kingdom Distributed by National Book Network Copyright © 2010 by Jerry Johnson All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992. Printed in the United States of America Knowing Yellowstone Science in America’s First National Park Jerry Johnson, Editor iv Knowing Yellowstone: Science in America’s First National Park Acknowledgments: Many people are involved in the evolution and eventual publication of a book. The authors of the chapters that follow willingly took time from busy field seasons and research programs to deliver their highly technical work in a format accessible to those who are not immersed in the world of doing science. I thank them for their good work. Several individuals supported this project from the start. John Peters is the director of the Thermal Biology Institute at Montana State University and deserves special thanks for his continued institutional and financial support. The Institute conducts and promotes research and education focused on the biology and interrelated physical and chemical processes of geothermal environments in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. In addition to doing important science, the center has an outstanding record of educational outreach from K-12 and beyond. John’s support for this project began with a TBI “University of the Yellowstone” award and continued through to publication. John Varley is the former director of the Yellowstone Center for Resources at Yellowstone National Park as well as the former director of the MSU Big Sky Institute; he has been immersed in Yellowstone science for over four decades. John not only provided institutional and financial support through BSI, he was a my sounding board for ideas about the book, introduced me to some of the authors, and was always available to teach me something about the history and politics of the Park. He is an understated and gracious guy and I consider him a friend. Trey Ratcliff generously made his collection of spectacular photographs of Yellowstone available. The cover photo is his as are several photos that appear at the beginning of chapters. Trey sees the natural world differently from most of us. His eye combined with his unique artistic expression make him one of my favorite amateur photographers. Check out his website at: stuckincustoms.com and his new book “A World in HDR”. Two other photographers deserve special mention - thanks to Ken McElroy and Steve Hinch for the generous donations of their photographs. A sincere thank-you goes out to Gerry and Wright Ohrstrom. The two Monicas – Monica Chodkiewicz, responsible for the beautiful layout of the book, and Monica Brelsford, helped me through numerous parts of the project, were a joy to work with. I benefited from their experience producing education materials for TBI. My wife Barbara, Heather Rauser at TBI, and Professor David Parker, a colleague of mine at MSU, read the manuscript and provided me with many constructive suggestions. I value their contributions and thank them. My editor at Taylor-Trade, Rick Rinehart, brought many years of interest and experience to a book on Yellowstone. Thanks. My parents immersed us kids into the world of nature and science when we could walk. This book is dedicated to them. Finally, thanks to all the researchers – professional and amateur alike, who have spent many decades exploring the nuances of the world’s first national park. They make the Yellowstone a richer and more stimulating place for all of us. Foreward : Knowing Yellowstone: Science in America’s First National Park v vi Knowing Yellowstone: Science in America’s First National Park Foreword John W. Peters & John D. Varley Yellowstone National Park represents many things to many people. For a select and lucky few, the Park is a place to do important and complex science. The government-sponsored and comprehensive Hayden Expedition of 1871 began a tradition of research in Yellowstone and within the first decade of the Park’s existence, mechanisms were already being put in place for the management and regulation of all human endeavor in Yellowstone, including scientific work. In the early days few people were allowed direct access to park resources for scientific research –most likely because there were few scientists--but today, NPS staff issue and monitor over 200 research permits each year which makes Yellowstone one of the most studied parcels of ground in the world. Except for brief periods when a few scientists took advantage of their privileges, the commitment of the National Park Service to research in Yellowstone has been unwavering. Even in the summer of 1988, as wildfires were still burning, scientists began designing research protocols and collecting data on burn patterns and fire behavior, impacts on park wildlife, and forest regeneration and many of those studies continue today. Today’s challenge for the park service and for researchers is not much different than it has been throughout Yellowstone’s history: how to balance access to sites of scientific interest and structuring studies to be informative while avoiding ecological impact. Both sides also increasingly recognize the importance of passing on what is learned to enhance the public’s understanding and experience. Park managers know that good science can enrich a visit to Yellowstone and most visitors have a strong fascination with what science can tell them about the Park. And they should. Many of the “hot-button” issues in wildlife management, bioprospecting and intellectual property rights, biotechnology, renewable energy, and global climate change are rooted in the Park and fuels lively public discourse. Montana State University has factored strongly in the makeup of Yellowstone-centric research across all disciplines of science. The close proximity of the Park to MSU’s home in Bozeman attracts world-class investigators to join our faculty and the renowned centers of excellence that have been established. The Thermal Biology Institute and Big Sky Institute are two such centers and as directors, we are proud of the role our affiliations play in Yellowstone science and policy. A recent study conducted by MSU ecology professor Dave Roberts showed that MSU received more than five times as many competitively awarded grants and at least three times as many publications on Yellowstone as its nearest competitor. The enthusiasm of the MSU faculty for Yellowstone has been infectious making it even more exciting to be involved in catalyzing the publication of “Knowing Yellowstone”. The work embraces the true breadth of contemporary science in the world’s first national park. We hope it is a resource that will be cherished by those interested in Yellowstone for many years to come. Foreward : Knowing Yellowstone: Science in America’s First National Park vii viii Knowing Yellowstone: Science in America’s First National Park Contents v/ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS vii/ FOREWARD / John W. Peters, John D. Varley xi/ INTRODUCTION / Jerry Johnson 1/ CHAPTER 1 Thinking Big About the Greater Yellowstone / Andy Hansen 17/ CHAPTER 2 Mapping the Last Frontier in Yellowstone National Park: Yellowstone Lake / Lisa A. Morgan, W.C. Pat Shanks 33/ CHAPTER 3 Using Yellowstone’s Past to Understand the Future / Cathy Whitlock 49/ CHAPTER 4 Understanding Grizzlies: Science of the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team / Charles C. Schwartz, Mark A. Haroldson, Kerry A. Gunther 65/ CHAPTER 5 Interactions Between Wolves and Elk in the Yellowstone Ecosystem / Scott Creel 81/ CHAPTER 6 Brucellosis in Cattle, Bison, and Elk: Management Conflicts in a Society with Diverse Values / Paul C. Cross, Mike R. Ebinger, Victoria Patrek, Rick Wallen 95/ CHAPTER 7 Fisheries Science and Management in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: Ensuring Good Fishing by Preserving Healthy Ecosystems / Alexander V. Zale 113/ CHAPTER 8 If You Can’t Measure It, You Can’t Manage It: An Ecological Approach to Weed Management / Bruce D. Maxwell, Lisa J. Rew 127/ CHAPTER 9 Yellowstone Extremeophiles: The Life of Heat-Loving Microbes / Mark Young, Jennifer S. Fulton 141/ CHAPTER 10 The Science of Storytelling: Policy Marketing and Wicked Problems in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem / Elizabeth Shanahan, Mark McBeth Contents: Knowing Yellowstone: Science in America’s First National Park ix The national park is the best idea America ever had. - James Bryce, Britain’s Ambassador to the U.S. 1912 x Knowing Yellowstone: Science in America’s First National Park Introduction Modern science writers take us into the world of the research is dangerous and spectacular – trapping particle physics through experiments in the Large and
Recommended publications
  • Big Hole River Fluvial Arctic Grayling
    FLUVIAL ARCTIC GRAYLING MONITORING REPORT 2003 James Magee and Peter Lamothe Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks Dillon, Montana Submitted To: Fluvial Arctic Grayling Workgroup And Beaverhead National Forest Bureau of Land Management Montana Chapter, American Fisheries Society Montana Council, Trout Unlimited Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service June 2004 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The following individuals and organizations contributed valuable assistance to the project in 2003. Scott Lula, Greg Gibbons, Zachary Byram, Tracy Elam, Tim Mosolf, and Dick Oswald of Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (FWP), provided able field assistance. Ken Staigmiller (FWP) collected samples for disease testing. Ken McDonald (FWP), provided administrative support, chaired the Fluvial Arctic Grayling Workgroup, reviewed progress reports and assisted funding efforts. Bob Snyder provided support as Native Species Coordinator. Dick Oswald (FWP) provided technical advice and expertise. Bruce Rich (FWP) provided direction as regional fisheries supervisor. Jim Brammer, Dennis Havig, Dan Downing, and Chris Riley (USFS) assisted with funding, provided housing for FWP technicians, and assisted with fieldwork. Bill Krise, and Ron Zitzow, Matt Toner, and the staff of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Bozeman Fish Technology Center maintained the brood reserve stock and transported grayling to the upper Ruby River. Jack Boyce, Mark Kornick and Jim Drissell, and crew of Big Springs Hatchery assisted with egg takes at Axolotl and Green Hollow II brood lakes, and transported eyed grayling eggs for RSI use in the upper Ruby River and to Bluewater State Fish Hatchery for rearing reaches. Gary Shaver, Bob Braund, and Dave Ellis from Bluewater State Hatchery raised and transported grayling to the Ruby River and the Missouri Headwaters restoration reaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Montana Arctic
    Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Montana Arctic Grayling Restoration August 2007 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING among: MONTANA FISH, WILDLIFE & PARKS (FWP) U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT (BLM) U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS) U.S. FOREST SERVICE (USFS) MONTANA COUNCIL TROUT UNLIMITED (TU) MONTANA CHAPTER AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY (AFS) YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK (YNP) MONTANA ARCTIC GRAYLING RECOVERY PROGRAM (AGRP) USDA NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION (DNRC) concerning MONTANA ARCTIC GRAYLING RESTORATION BACKGROUND Montana’s Arctic grayling Thymallus arcticus is a unique native species that comprises an important component of Montana’s history and natural heritage. Fluvial (river dwelling) Arctic grayling were once widespread in the Missouri River drainage, but currently wild grayling persist only in the Big Hole River, representing approximately 4% of their native range in Montana. Native lacustrine/adfluvial populations historically distributed in the Red Rock drainage and possibly the Big Hole drainage have also been reduced in abundance and distribution. Arctic grayling have a long history of being petitioned for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Most recently (in April 2007) the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) determined that listing of Arctic grayling in Montana under ESA was not warranted because it does not constitute a distinct population segment as defined by the ESA. On May 15th 2007, the Center for Biological Diversity announced its 60-day Intent to Sue the USFWS regarding the recent grayling decision. The Montana Arctic Grayling Recovery Program (AGRP) was formed in 1987 following declines in the Big Hole River Arctic grayling population, and over concerns for the Red Rock population.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruby River Access Sites Secured by Bruce Farling Hen the Topic of Stream Access Families, There Would Be No Formal Fishing Ago
    SPRING TROUT LINE 2016 Newsletter from the Montana Council of Trout Unlimited Ruby River access sites secured by Bruce Farling hen the topic of stream access families, there would be no formal fishing ago. Because of budget constraints, and the Ruby River is raised access sites for 40-plus river miles below some caused by limits imposed by Win Montana it’s often related the Vigilante Fishing Access Site a couple the Legislature, as well as demands at to absentee landowner James Cox miles downstream of the Ruby River Dam. some of the other 330 sites in FWP’s Kennedy from Atlanta and his 15-year Three county bridge popular fishing access legal and political efforts to prevent the rights-of-way provide site program, the public from accessing this great fishery. the only other points department didn’t However, not all stories about stream of access on the lower have adequate funding access coming from the Ruby Valley river. But the bridges to renew the leases for are as distressing as the Kennedy tale. have limited parking. the previous agreed Recently we can thank some civic-minded Plus, Mr. Kennedy upon price. The ranchers and, in part, Montana TU and has contested bridge Doornbos, Barnosky three of its chapters for a bit of good access in court and and Guillame families, news about the Ruby. made getting to the however, graciously Since the mid-1990s, three long- river at those spots agreed to lease the time ranching families in the valley have physically difficult access sites at a much- been leasing portions of their properties with his fencing schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • Yellowstone Hot Springs Are Organic Chemodiversity Hot Spots Michael Gonsior1, Norbert Hertkorn2, Nancy Hinman3, Sabine E.-M
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Yellowstone Hot Springs are Organic Chemodiversity Hot Spots Michael Gonsior1, Norbert Hertkorn2, Nancy Hinman3, Sabine E.-M. Dvorski2, Mourad Harir2, William J. Cooper4 & Philippe Schmitt-Kopplin2,5 Received: 5 June 2018 Yellowstone National Park hydrothermal springs were investigated according to their organic Accepted: 11 September 2018 geochemistry with a special focus on the Yellowstone hot spring dissolved organic matter (YDOM) Published: xx xx xxxx that was solid-phase extracted. Here we show that YDOM has a unique chemodiversity that has not yet been observed anywhere else in aquatic surface environments and that Yellowstone hot springs are organic chemodiversity hot spots. Four main geochemically classifed hot spring types (alkaline- chloride, mixed alkaline-chloride, acid-chloride-sulfate and travertine-precipitating) exhibited distinct organic molecular signatures that correlated remarkably well with the known inorganic geochemistry and manifested themselves in excitation emission matrix fuorescence, nuclear magnetic resonance, and ultrahigh resolution mass spectra. YDOM contained thousands of molecular formulas unique to Yellowstone of which 80% contained sulfur, even in low hydrogen sulfde containing alkaline-chloride springs. This unique YDOM refects the extreme organic geochemistry present in the hydrothermal features of Yellowstone National Park. Physical, chemical, and biological processes control the evolution of minerals and dissolved organic mat- ter (DOM) over a vast range of mass, length, and time1. Indeed, mutual interferences and interactions among these processes presumably have defned chemical and biological evolution throughout Earth history. Modern terrestrial biology operates largely within limited temperature, pH, and redox conditions. In contrast, extreme environments, such as hot springs, have wide ranges of physicochemical parameters, generally believed to be similar to environments found on early Earth2.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2021 Meeting Minutes
    Big Hole Watershed Committee Monthly Meeting Minutes June 16th, 2021 – 7:00 pm at the Divide Grange Zoom option also provided In Attendance In-person: Pedro Marques, BHWC; Tana Nulph, BHWC; Ben LaPorte, BHWC; Jarrett Payne, MFWP; Jim Hagenbarth, Rancher/BHWC; Max Hanson, UM/BHWC Intern; Paul Cleary, Resident/BHWC; Sandy Cleary, Resident; Matt Norberg, DNRC; Betty Bowler, Resident; Tom Bowler, Resident; Hans Humbert, Rancher/BHWC; Randy Smith, Rancher/BHWC; Jim Dennehy, Butte-Silver Bow Water Dept./BHWC; Thomas Woolf, MFWP; Scott Reynolds, Resident; Steve Luebeck, Sportsman/BHWC; and John Reinhardt, Rancher/BHWC. Zoom: Charley (no last name given); Chris Edgington, MTU; and Paul Siddoway. Meeting Minutes BHWC monthly meetings are now held at the Divide Grange with a virtual (Zoom) option provided thanks to Southern Montana Telephone Company, who donated the internet service. Meeting minutes and recordings are available at https://bhwc.org/monthly-meetings/ (scroll down for meeting minutes archive). Printed copies are available during in-person meetings. Contact Tana Nulph, BHWC Associate Director, at [email protected] or (406) 267-3421 to suggest additions or corrections. Reports Streamflow/Snowpack Report as of June 16, 2021 – Matt Norberg, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation • Streamflows: Streamflows in the Big Hole River have generally been below to well below average since the start of April. The bulk of the snowpack has melted off and the river peaked earlier and lower than normal. Daily average flows for this time of year are well below normal Big Hole Watershed Committee, 2021 Page 1 levels with most of the gages reporting streamflow’s well below the 25th percentile with some even below the 10th percentile.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson River at Three Forks, Montana
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT JEFFERSON RIVER AT THREE FORKS, MONTANA Prepared by U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, OMAHA, NEBRASKA December 1971 Jefferson River at Three Forks, Montana ( ) Draft (X) Final Environmental Statement Responsible Office: U.S. Army Engineer District, Omaha, Nebraska 1. Name of Action: (x) Administrative ( ) Legislative 2. Description of Action: The proposed project would consist of the construction of an earth filled levee and a drainage collector ditch approximately lU ,700 feet in length along the northwest side of a small community. The location is at Three Forks in Gallatin County, Montana. 3. a. Environmental Impacts; Flood protection would be provided for a flood having a frequency of occurrence of once in a 100 years. A 28 acre loss of alternate land use would be required for levee alignment. A possibilit would exist for pollutants from adjacent land to accumulate in the collector ditch. A potential would exist for the collector ditch to develop aquatic growth. Five hundred feet of shelterbelt would be lost to levee construction. b. Adverse Environmental Effects: Construction would effect the removal of 28 acres of land from alternative land use; collector ditch could act as a collector of pollutants; and construction of the levee would necessitate the removal of 500 feet of shelterbelt. Alternatives; Floodplain zoning, evacuation, flood proofing, reservoir construction, channel improvement, and ”no development” were considered. 5• Comments Received: City of Three Forks Bureau of Sport Fisheries & Wildlife, USDI Montana Department of Fish Bureau of Reclamation, USDI and Game Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, USDI Montana Department of Health Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA Montana Highway Commission Bureau of Mines, USDI Soil Conservation Service, USDA Montana Water Resources Board National Park Service, USDI 6.
    [Show full text]
  • BIG HOLE National Battlefield
    BIG HOLE National Battlefield Historical Research Management Plan & Bibliography of the ERCE WAR, 1877 F 737 .B48H35 November 1967 Historical Research Management Plan BIG HOLE NATI ONAL for .BATILEFIELD LI BRP..RY BIG HOLE Na tional Battlefield & Bibliog raphy of the N E Z PERCE WAR, 1877 By AUBREY L. HAINES DIVISION OF HISTORY Office of Archeology and Historic Preservatio.n November 1967 U.S. Department of the Interior NATI ONAL PARK SERVICE HISTORICAL RESEARCH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR BIG HOLE NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD November 1968 Recommended Superintendent Date Reviewed Division of History Date Approved Chief, Office of Archeology Date and Historic Preservation i TABLE OF CONTENTS Historical Research Management Plan Approval Sheet I. The Park Story and Purpose . • • • 1 A. The Main His torical Theme ••••••• 1 B. Sub sidiary Historical Theme • • • • • 1 1 c. Relationship of Historical Themes to Natural History and Anthropology • • • • • • • • 12 D. Statement of Historical Significance •• 14 E. Reasons for Establishment of the Park • • • • • 15 II. Historical Resources of the Battlefield 1 7 A. Tangible Resources • • • • 17 1. Sites and Remains 1 7 a. Those Related to the Main Park Theme • • . 1 7 b. Those Related to Subsidiary Themes • 25 2. Historic Structures 27 B. Intangible Resources • 2 7 c. Other Resources 2 8 III.Status of Research •• 2 9 A. Research Accomplished 29 H. Research in Progress • • • • • 3o c. Cooperation with Non-Service Institutions 36 IV. Research Needs ••••••••••••••••• 37 A. Site Identification and Evaluation Studies 37 H. General Background Studies and Survey Histories 40 c. Studies for Interpretive Development • • • • • 4 1 D. Development Studies • • • • • • • • • 4 1 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper and North Fork Big Hole River Watershed Restoration Plan
    Big Hole River, Montana Watershed Restoration Plan Part I: Upper & North Fork Big Hole Watershed Produced by: Big Hole Watershed Committee November 1, 2012 Big Hole Watershed Committee PO Box 21 Divide, Montana 59727 website: bhwc.org Produced with Funds and Support from: Montana Department of Environmental Quality 319 Program Helena, Montana Big Hole River Watershed Restoration Plan - November 1, 2012 Part I: Upper & North Fork Big Hole River Watershed Page | 2 Table of Contents Tables ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 Figures ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Project Area .................................................................................................................................................. 8 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Purpose ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 Watershed Restoration Planning ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Fishing Regulations
    MONTANA FISHING REGULATIONS 20March 1, 2018 — F1ebruary 828, 2019 Fly fishing the Missouri River. Photo by Jason Savage For details on how to use these regulations, see page 2 fwp.mt.gov/fishing With your help, we can reduce poaching. MAKE THE CALL: 1-800-TIP-MONT FISH IDENTIFICATION KEY If you don’t know, let it go! CUTTHROAT TROUT are frequently mistaken for Rainbow Trout (see pictures below): 1. Turn the fish over and look under the jaw. Does it have a red or orange stripe? If yes—the fish is a Cutthroat Trout. Carefully release all Cutthroat Trout that cannot be legally harvested (see page 10, releasing fish). BULL TROUT are frequently mistaken for Brook Trout, Lake Trout or Brown Trout (see below): 1. Look for white edges on the front of the lower fins. If yes—it may be a Bull Trout. 2. Check the shape of the tail. Bull Trout have only a slightly forked tail compared to the lake trout’s deeply forked tail. 3. Is the dorsal (top) fin a clear olive color with no black spots or dark wavy lines? If yes—the fish is a Bull Trout. Carefully release Bull Trout (see page 10, releasing fish). MONTANA LAW REQUIRES: n All Bull Trout must be released immediately in Montana unless authorized. See Western District regulations. n Cutthroat Trout must be released immediately in many Montana waters. Check the district standard regulations and exceptions to know where you can harvest Cutthroat Trout. NATIVE FISH Westslope Cutthroat Trout Species of Concern small irregularly shaped black spots, sparse on belly Average Size: 6”–12” cutthroat slash— spots
    [Show full text]
  • Population Viability of Arctic Grayling in the Gibbon River, Yellowstone National Park
    North American Journal of Fisheries Management 30:1582–1590, 2010 [Article] Ó Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2010 DOI: 10.1577/M10-083.1 Population Viability of Arctic Grayling in the Gibbon River, Yellowstone National Park 1 AMBER C. STEED* Montana Cooperative Fishery Research Unit and Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Post Office Box 173460, Bozeman, Montana 59717, USA ALEXANDER V. ZALE U.S. Geological Survey, Montana Cooperative Fishery Research Unit, and Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Post Office Box 173460, Bozeman, Montana 59717, USA TODD M. KOEL Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Program, Yellowstone Center for Resources, Post Office Box 168, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming 82190, USA STEVEN T. KALINOWSKI Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Post Office Box 172460, Bozeman, Montana 59717, USA Abstract.—The fluvial Arctic grayling Thymallus arcticus is restricted to less than 5% of its native range in the contiguous United States and was relisted as a category 3 candidate species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act in 2010. Although fluvial Arctic grayling of the lower Gibbon River, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, were considered to have been extirpated by 1935, anglers and biologists have continued to report catching low numbers of Arctic grayling in the river. Our goal was to determine whether a viable population of fluvial Arctic grayling persisted in the Gibbon River or whether the fish caught in the river were downstream emigrants from lacustrine populations in headwater lakes. We addressed this goal by determining relative abundances, sources, and evidence for successful spawning of Arctic grayling in the Gibbon River.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Big Hole River Basin 41D Index of Claims by Source Name, by Enforceable Priority Date
    04/06/2007 Page 1 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION BIG HOLE RIVER BASIN 41D INDEX OF CLAIMS BY SOURCE NAME, BY ENFORCEABLE PRIORITY DATE TRIB Values: CB=Closed Basin, MP= Manmade Pit, NO=Natural Overflow, NP=Natural Pit, OF=Overflow and Waste Water, SI=Subirrigation, SP=Spring, WS=Waste & Seepage, WW=Waste Water, UT=Unnamed Tributary; POD Indicator: &=Only First POD Listed WATER WATER VERSION LATE HISTORICAL USE FLOW ENFORCEABLE POINT OF DIVERSION TRIB SOURCE NAME OWNER NAME RIGHT ID RIGHT TYPE STATUS CLAIM TYPE RATE PRIORITY DAT QTR SEC SEC TWP RGE CN 41D 93827 CLAIM ACTV DECREE IR 2.50 CFS 05/01/1890 SESENE 19 1S 11W BE ADSON CREEK CONNOLLY, J W CONNOLLY, SHIRLEY B 41D 53770 CLAIM ACTV USE ST 11/05/1906 S2 20 1S 11W BE & ADSON CREEK USA (DEPT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE) 41D 53918 CLAIM WDRN CM AGNES LAKE SPRING USA (DEPT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE) 41B 10700 CLAIM ACTV DECREE IR 2.50 CFS 05/01/1870 SWSESW 35 5S 8W BE ALBERS SLOUGH OPEN A RANCH INC 41B 10702 CLAIM ACTV DECREE IR 5.00 CFS 05/01/1870 SWSESW 35 5S 8W BE ALBERS SLOUGH OPEN A RANCH INC 41B 10701 CLAIM ACTV DECREE IR 10.00 CFS 05/01/1876 SWSESW 35 5S 8W BE ALBERS SLOUGH OPEN A RANCH INC 41B 10703 CLAIM ACTV DECREE IR 7.50 CFS 06/01/1888 NESENE 9 6S 8W BE WS ALBERS SLOUGH OPEN A RANCH INC 41D 93289 CLAIM ACTV USE ST 01/01/1875 S2SESE 13 1N 11W BE & ALDER CREEK FONG RMBP FAMILY TRUST TURNBULL, JEANETTE TURNBULL, MARK A 41D 93272 CLAIM ACTV FILED IR 8.26 CFS 07/24/1886 SESWNE 24 1N 12W BE ALDER CREEK SYRING, RALPH C SYRING, RUTH M TURNBULL, JEANETTE TURNBULL,
    [Show full text]
  • Old Faithful Area
    Yellowstone – Old Faithful Area OLD FAITHFUL AREA MAP Page 1 of 25 Yellowstone – Old Faithful Area Old Faithful to Madison Road Map Page 2 of 25 Yellowstone – Old Faithful Area Old Faithful to Grant Village Interactive Road Map Page 3 of 25 Yellowstone – Old Faithful Area Old Faithful Area Tour - North Page 4 of 25 Yellowstone – Old Faithful Area Old Faithful Area Tour - South Page 5 of 25 Yellowstone – Old Faithful Area Old Faithful Area Tour Introduction The largest concentration of geysers in the world is in the Upper Geyser Basin. Several of the more prominent geysers and hot springs are included on this tour with information concerning their eruption patterns, names, and relationships with other geothermal features. Upper Geyser Basin - South Section: Old Faithful Geyser Old Faithful erupts more frequently than any of the other big geysers, although it is not the largest or most regular geyser in the park. Its average interval between eruptions is about 91 minutes, varying from 65 - 92 minutes. An eruption lasts 1 1/2 to 5 minutes, expels 3,700 - 8,400 gallons (14,000 - 32,000 liters) of boiling water, and reaches heights of 106 - 184 feet (30 - 55m). It was named for its consistent performance by members of the Washburn Expedition in 1870. Although its average interval has lengthened through the years (due to earthquakes and vandalism), Old Faithful is still as spectacular and predictable as it was a century ago. The largest active geyser in the world is Steamboat Geyser in the Norris Geyser Basin. Giantess Geyser Infrequent but violent eruptions characterize Giantess Geyser.
    [Show full text]