An Administrative History of Big Hole National Battlefield. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Administrative History of Big Hole National Battlefield. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept DOCUMENT RESUME ED 440 038 SO 031 703 AUTHOR Catton, Theodore; Hubber, Ann TITLE Commemoration and Preservation: An Administrative History of Big Hole National Battlefield. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept. of Interior), Washington, DC. PUB DATE 1999-00-00 NOTE 202p.; Prepared by Historical Research Associates, Inc., Missoula, Montana for the National Park Service's Columbia Cascades Support Office. AVAILABLE FROM United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Big Hole National Battlefield, P.O. Box 237, Wisdom, MT 59761. Tel: 406-689-3155. For full text: http://www.nps.gov/biho/adhi/adhi.htm. PUB TYPE Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *American Indians; Educational Facilities; Field Trips; *Government Role; Historic Sites; Indigenous Populations; *National Parks; *United States History; *War IDENTIFIERS Nez Perce (Tribe); Site Visits ABSTRACT Few places in the west are as evocative of the tragic story of the Indian Wars as Big Hole (Montana) National Battlefield. The site memorializes the bravery of the Nez Perce and U.S. soldiers and volunteers who fought there during the epic flight of the Nez Perce in 1877. Big Hole preserves the scene of one of the most famous battles of the Indian Wars. This administrative history is divided into chronological chapters, with each chapter divided into topical sections and subsections. A chronological organization highlights two salient themes in Big Hole National Battlefield's administrative development:(1) its long evolution as a small unit assigned to a succession of federal agencies (the War Department, the Forest Service, and the National Park Service); and (2) the close connection that exists between its land base, interpretive (education) program, and resource management. Chapters are: (1) "The Battle and Its Aftermath (1877-1883)"; (2) "Administration under the U.S. Department of War (1883-1910)"; (3) "Administration under the U.S. Forest Service (1910-1936)"; (4) "Administration under Yellowstone National Park, Early Years (1936-1956)"; (5) "Administration under Yellowstone National Park, Later Years (1956-1977)"; (6) "Administration under the Rocky Mountain Regional Office (1977-1987)"; and (7)"Administration under Other Small Units (1987-1997)." An appendix contains laws and executive orders. (Contains 82 references and 458 chapter notes.) (BT) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. Cr) OCommemoration and Preservation: Cr) An Administrative History- of O Big Hole National Battlefield U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of ucational Research and Improvement 0 EDU ONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as Ci) received from the person or organization originating it. Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this 113-EST-COPTAVAILABEE- document do not necessarily represent official OERI position cr policy. Commemoration and Preservation: An Administrative History of Big Hole National Battlefield Prepared for NATIONAL PARK SERVICE n I)eperfreoot of Ole Merl., USDI National Park Service Columbia Cascades Support Office by Theodore Catton, Project Historian Ann Hubber, Project Historian Historical Research Associates, Inc. Missoula, Montana 1999 3 Table of Contents Preface iii Chapter One The Battle and Its Aftermath (1877-1883) 1 Chapter Two Administration under the U.S. Department of War (1883-1910) 13 Chapter Three Administration Under The U.S. Forest Service, (1910-1936) 23 Chapter Four Administration under Yellowstone National Park, early years (1936-1956) 43 Chapter Five Administration Under Yellowstone National Park, Later Years (1956-1977) 61 Chapter Six Administration Under the Rocky Mountain Regional Office (1977-1987) 93 Chapter Seven Administration under other Small Units (1987-1997) 109 Conclusion 145 Annotated Bibliography 147 Endnotes 153 Index 183 Laws and Executive Orders Appendix A 4 Big Hole National Battlefield. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. Cover Photograph. Chief Joseph and Colonel John Gibbon, erstwhile adversaries in the Battle of the Big Hole, sat for this portrait many years later. Photograph courtesy of Big Hole National Battlefield. ii 5 Preface Few places in the West are as evocative of the tragic story of the Indian Wars as Big Hole National Battlefield. This site memorializes the bravery of the Nez Perce and U.S. soldiers and volunteers who fought here during the epic flight of the Nez Perce in 1877 and preserves the scene of one of the most famous battles of the Indian Wars.Located in the lush Big Hole Valley in southwestern Montana, the beauty and tranquility of the setting add immeasurably to the solemnity of the battlefield. "One of the great ironies associated with American battlefields is that they are often quite beautiful," cultural historian Edward Linenthal observed in his book Sacred Ground. Here the picturesque natural setting has changed relatively little since the day of the predawn attack on the Nez Perce village, August 9, 1877. Today, this national park system unit of 655 acres encompasses most of the principal features of the battlefield. Roughly rectangular in shape, it is bounded by the two-lane State Highway 43 on the south, Beaverhead National Forest on the west and north, and private ranch land on the east. Bisecting the area, the North Fork of the Big Hole River meanders in a northeasterly course through ,swampy bottomland. Battle Mountain rises on the northwest side of this river valley, Ruby Bench on the southeast side. )- BIG HOLE BBattle Mountain is backed b ythe forest- 0 Twin Trees. covered Anaconda Range, Ruby Bench \-1N NATIONAL by the high, open expanse of the Big Hole Valley. BATTLEFIELD "i Overlook The natural boundary between forest Site of and steppe at this location, although in Monument Nez Perce pronounced, does not quite follow the Howitzer Camp Capture \I saw- foot of the mountains. The lower slope of ,) ; Battle Mountain is marked by a treeless, /Ask t's ./ grassy, open area now known as the rcs;:cis- -picruci .../obetw- Horse Pasture. Here, the Nez Perce Nei ,-Visitor grazed their horses while they were C,!fiq4- Center encamped along the other side of the river, and from this point came the pre- dawn attack by the U.S. soldiers and To0 w volunteers. To the west of the Horse 011.1 0.5 Kilometer To Wisdom /0mi Pasture, in a draw known as Battle Gulch, () 0.1 0.5 Mile 16km the lodgepole forest extends down to the valley floor over a low promontory known as the Point of Timber. This site was the defensive position picked by Lt. Colonel John Gibbon when he called retreat. Forced back across the river and taking the high ground within these trees, Gibbon's command dug rifle pits and threw up breastworks in a roughly circular position now known as the Siege Area. iii BEST COPYAVAILABLE As originally established in 1910, Big Hole Battlefield National Monument consisted of just five acres where the siege had taken place. Enlarged to 200 acres in 1939, the national monument then included all of the Siege Area plus the route of Colonel Gibbon's approach and the area along the foot of Battle Mountain from which he had launched his initial attack. Still outside the boundary of the national monument, however, was the Nez Perce Encampment Area where some of the fiercest fighting had occurred on the morning of August 9. Further additions, authorized by an act of Congress in 1963 and accomplished over the next decade, brought the Encampment Area and the development site into the unit. Bloody Gulch, where most of the Nez Perce withdrew while the warriors held their attackers at bay, remains outside on private land. This administrative history is divided into chronological chapters, with each chapter divided into topical sections and subsections. We chose a chronological organization to highlight what we thought to be two salient themes in Big Hole National Battlefield's administrative development: first, its long evolution as a small unit assigned to a succession of federal agencies (the War Department, the Forest Service, the National Park Service) and then to a succession of other units within the national park system (Yellowstone National Park, Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site, Nez Perce National Historical Park); and second, the close connection that exists between its land base, interpretive program, and resource management. Since its establishment as a national monument in 1910, Big Hole has been an administrative orphan, passed from one agency or unit to another about every ten to twenty years. Prior to 1910, the War Department had a limited involvement in the administration of the battlefield. From 1910 to 1933, the administration of Big Hole battlefield was shared between the War Department and the U.S. Forest Service. Since coming into the national park system in 1933, Big Hole has been, assigned to regional offices in Omaha, Denver, Seattle, and San Francisco, while its unit managers have reported directly to superintendents of Yellowstone National Park, Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site, and Nez Perce National Historical Park. At different times the NPS has regarded Big Hole as coming within the political and recreational orbit of Yellowstone (as the nearest large national park in Montana), or within the interpretive orbit of Nez Perce Country, centered in Idaho. Frequent changes both in regional administrative boundaries and in thematic groupings of national park system units have impeded the smooth development of Big Hole's physical plant and management plans. Throughout its history, Big Hole National Battlefield's land base has exerted a powerful effect on how the site was interpreted and protected. The soldiers' monument, erected in 1883, was explicitly dedicated to the U.S. military's role in the battle and tacitly overlooked the Nez Perce experience and perspective. This imbalance was perpetuated in the proclamation of 1910, which set aside five acres around the soldiers' monument but left the Nez Perce Encampment Area in private hands.
Recommended publications
  • Big Hole River Fluvial Arctic Grayling
    FLUVIAL ARCTIC GRAYLING MONITORING REPORT 2003 James Magee and Peter Lamothe Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks Dillon, Montana Submitted To: Fluvial Arctic Grayling Workgroup And Beaverhead National Forest Bureau of Land Management Montana Chapter, American Fisheries Society Montana Council, Trout Unlimited Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service June 2004 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The following individuals and organizations contributed valuable assistance to the project in 2003. Scott Lula, Greg Gibbons, Zachary Byram, Tracy Elam, Tim Mosolf, and Dick Oswald of Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (FWP), provided able field assistance. Ken Staigmiller (FWP) collected samples for disease testing. Ken McDonald (FWP), provided administrative support, chaired the Fluvial Arctic Grayling Workgroup, reviewed progress reports and assisted funding efforts. Bob Snyder provided support as Native Species Coordinator. Dick Oswald (FWP) provided technical advice and expertise. Bruce Rich (FWP) provided direction as regional fisheries supervisor. Jim Brammer, Dennis Havig, Dan Downing, and Chris Riley (USFS) assisted with funding, provided housing for FWP technicians, and assisted with fieldwork. Bill Krise, and Ron Zitzow, Matt Toner, and the staff of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Bozeman Fish Technology Center maintained the brood reserve stock and transported grayling to the upper Ruby River. Jack Boyce, Mark Kornick and Jim Drissell, and crew of Big Springs Hatchery assisted with egg takes at Axolotl and Green Hollow II brood lakes, and transported eyed grayling eggs for RSI use in the upper Ruby River and to Bluewater State Fish Hatchery for rearing reaches. Gary Shaver, Bob Braund, and Dave Ellis from Bluewater State Hatchery raised and transported grayling to the Ruby River and the Missouri Headwaters restoration reaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Good Words: Chief Joseph and the Production of Indian Speech(Es), Texts, and Subjects
    Good Words: Chief Joseph and the Production of Indian Speech(es), Texts, and Subjects Thomas H. Guthrie, Guilford College Abstract. Chief Joseph, who gained fame during the Nez Perce War of 1877, is one of the best-known Indian orators in American history. Yet the two principal texts attributed to him were produced under questionable circumstances, and it is unclear to what extent they represent anything he ever said. This essay examines the publication history of these texts and then addresses two questions about the treatment of Indian oratory in the nineteenth century. First, given their uncertain provenance, how and why did these texts become so popular and come to rep- resent Indian eloquence and an authentic Native American voice? Second, what was the political significance of Indian speech and texts of Indian oratory in the confrontation between Euro-Americans and Indians over land? I argue that the production and interpretation of Indian speech facilitated political subjugation by figuring Indians as particular kinds of subjects and positioning them in a broader narrative about the West. The discursive and political dimensions of the encounter were inseparable, as Indian “eloquence” laid the way for Indian defeat. I conclude by advocating a disruptive reading of Indian oratory that rejects the belief that a real Indian subject lies behind these texts in any straightforward sense. To make this argument, I draw on linguistic anthropology and critical theory, analyzing firsthand accounts, newspaper reports, and descriptions of Indian speech and Nez Perce history. In 1879 the North American Review published an article titled “An Indian’s View of Indian Affairs” that was attributed to Chief Joseph, or In-mut- too-yah-lat-lat (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Montana Arctic
    Memorandum of Understanding Concerning Montana Arctic Grayling Restoration August 2007 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING among: MONTANA FISH, WILDLIFE & PARKS (FWP) U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT (BLM) U.S. FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS) U.S. FOREST SERVICE (USFS) MONTANA COUNCIL TROUT UNLIMITED (TU) MONTANA CHAPTER AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY (AFS) YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK (YNP) MONTANA ARCTIC GRAYLING RECOVERY PROGRAM (AGRP) USDA NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS) MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION (DNRC) concerning MONTANA ARCTIC GRAYLING RESTORATION BACKGROUND Montana’s Arctic grayling Thymallus arcticus is a unique native species that comprises an important component of Montana’s history and natural heritage. Fluvial (river dwelling) Arctic grayling were once widespread in the Missouri River drainage, but currently wild grayling persist only in the Big Hole River, representing approximately 4% of their native range in Montana. Native lacustrine/adfluvial populations historically distributed in the Red Rock drainage and possibly the Big Hole drainage have also been reduced in abundance and distribution. Arctic grayling have a long history of being petitioned for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Most recently (in April 2007) the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) determined that listing of Arctic grayling in Montana under ESA was not warranted because it does not constitute a distinct population segment as defined by the ESA. On May 15th 2007, the Center for Biological Diversity announced its 60-day Intent to Sue the USFWS regarding the recent grayling decision. The Montana Arctic Grayling Recovery Program (AGRP) was formed in 1987 following declines in the Big Hole River Arctic grayling population, and over concerns for the Red Rock population.
    [Show full text]
  • V&Tojttlj Fifam]^ A*K>$Fb WZ&N
    NFS Form 10400 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Lee's Ferry and Lonely Dell Ranch other name/site number: Pahreah Crossing; Lees Ferry; Lee's Ferry Ranch/AZ-C-2-42, AZ-C-2-11 2. Location __ _________________ street & number: Glen Canyon National Recreation Area (GLCA), at confluence of Colorado and Paria rivers, near the Utah and Arizona border not for publication: N/A vicinity: x city/town: Marble Canyon state: Arizona code: AZ county: Coconino code: 005 zip code: 86036 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets _ _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant _ nationally )^ statewide _ locally, ( _ See continuation sheet for addrtkSial comments.) . f\ ffytaJl_(y /l-f ^^/^li^^c^Cii^-P^-' j'J'/~ 77 Signature of certifying official/Title O Date USDI National Park Service, Washington State or Federal agency or bureau In my opinion, the property */ meets does not meet the National Register criteria. -V&toJttlJ fifaM]^ A*K>$fb WZ&n/1 Signature oT ccmmentFng or other official Da*te / Arizona State Historic Preservation Office State or Federal agency and bureau 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruby River Access Sites Secured by Bruce Farling Hen the Topic of Stream Access Families, There Would Be No Formal Fishing Ago
    SPRING TROUT LINE 2016 Newsletter from the Montana Council of Trout Unlimited Ruby River access sites secured by Bruce Farling hen the topic of stream access families, there would be no formal fishing ago. Because of budget constraints, and the Ruby River is raised access sites for 40-plus river miles below some caused by limits imposed by Win Montana it’s often related the Vigilante Fishing Access Site a couple the Legislature, as well as demands at to absentee landowner James Cox miles downstream of the Ruby River Dam. some of the other 330 sites in FWP’s Kennedy from Atlanta and his 15-year Three county bridge popular fishing access legal and political efforts to prevent the rights-of-way provide site program, the public from accessing this great fishery. the only other points department didn’t However, not all stories about stream of access on the lower have adequate funding access coming from the Ruby Valley river. But the bridges to renew the leases for are as distressing as the Kennedy tale. have limited parking. the previous agreed Recently we can thank some civic-minded Plus, Mr. Kennedy upon price. The ranchers and, in part, Montana TU and has contested bridge Doornbos, Barnosky three of its chapters for a bit of good access in court and and Guillame families, news about the Ruby. made getting to the however, graciously Since the mid-1990s, three long- river at those spots agreed to lease the time ranching families in the valley have physically difficult access sites at a much- been leasing portions of their properties with his fencing schemes.
    [Show full text]
  • Through the Bitterroot Valley -1877
    Th^ Flight of the NezFexce ...through the Bitterroot Valley -1877 United States Forest Bitterroot Department of Service National Agriculture Forest 1877 Flight of the Nez Perce ...through the Bitterroot Valley July 24 - Two companies of the 7th Infantry with Captain Rawn, sup­ ported by over 150 citizen volunteers, construct log barricade across Lolo Creek (Fort Fizzle). Many Bitterroot Valley women and children were sent to Fort Owen, MT, or the two hastily constructed forts near Corvallis and Skalkaho (Grantsdale). July 28 - Nez Perce by-pass Fort Fizzle, camp on McClain Ranch north of Carlton Creek. July 29 - Nez Perce camp near Silverthorn Creek, west of Stevensville, MT. July 30 - Nez Perce trade in Stevensville. August 1 - Nez Perce at Corvallis, MT. August 3 - Colonel Gibbon and 7th Infantry reach Fort Missoula. August 4 - Nez Perce camp near junction of East and West Forks of the Bitterroot River. Gibbon camp north of Pine Hollow, southwest of Stevensville. August 5 - Nez Perce camp above Ross' Hole (near Indian Trees Camp­ ground). Gibbon at Sleeping Child Creek. Catlin and volunteers agree to join him. August 6 - Nez Perce camp on Trail Creek. Gibbon makes "dry camp" south of Rye Creek on way up the hills leading to Ross' Hole. General Howard at Lolo Hot Springs. August 7 - Nez Perce camp along Big Hole River. Gibbon at foot of Conti­ nental Divide. Lieutenant Bradley sent ahead with volunteers to scout. Howard 22 miles east of Lolo Hot Springs. August 8 - Nez Perce in camp at Big Hole. Gibbon crosses crest of Continen­ tal Divide parks wagons and deploys his command, just a few miles from the Nez Perce camp.
    [Show full text]
  • A HISTORY OP FORT SHAW, MONTANA, from 1867 to 1892. by ANNE M. DIEKHANS SUBMITTED in PARTIAL FULFILLMENT of "CUM LAUDE"
    A HISTORY OP FORT SHAW, MONTANA, FROM 1867 TO 1892. by ANNE M. DIEKHANS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF "CUM LAUDE" RECOGNITION to the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY CARROLL COLLEGE 1959 CARROLL COLLEGE LIBRARY HELENA, MONTANA MONTANA COLLECTION CARROLL COLLEGE LIBRAS/- &-I THIS THESIS FOR "CUM LAUDE RECOGNITION BY ANNE M. DIEKHANS HAS BEEN APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY BY Date ii PREFACE Fort Shaw existed as a military post between the years of 1867 and 1892. The purpose of this thesis is to present the history of the post in its military aspects during that period. Other aspects are included but the emphasis is on the function of Fort Shaw as district headquarters of the United States Army in Montana Territory. I would like to thank all those who assisted me in any way in the writing of this thesis. I especially want to thank Miss Virginia Walton of the Montana Historical Society and the Rev. John McCarthy of the Carroll faculty for their aid and advice in the writing of this thesis. For techni­ cal advice I am indebted to Sister Mary Ambrosia of the Eng­ lish department at Carroll College. I also wish to thank the Rev. James R. White# Mr. Thomas A. Clinch, and Mr. Rich­ ard Duffy who assisted with advice and pictures. Thank you is also in order to Mrs. Shirley Coggeshall of Helena who typed the manuscript. A.M.D. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chggter Page I. GENERAL BACKGROUND............................... 1 II. MILITARY ACTIVITIES............................. 14 Baker Massacre Sioux Campaign The Big Hole Policing Duties Escort and Patrol Duties III.
    [Show full text]
  • The Montana Kaimin, February 14, 1939
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Associated Students of the University of Montana Montana Kaimin, 1898-present (ASUM) 2-14-1939 The onM tana Kaimin, February 14, 1939 Associated Students of Montana State University Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper Recommended Citation Associated Students of Montana State University, "The onM tana Kaimin, February 14, 1939" (1939). Montana Kaimin, 1898-present. 1695. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/studentnewspaper/1695 This Newspaper is brought to you for free and open access by the Associated Students of the University of Montana (ASUM) at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Montana Kaimin, 1898-present by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY, MISSOULA, MONTANA Z 400 TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1939. VOLUME XXXVIII. No. 44 Summer Schedule Includes “Smarty Party” High School Coaches Praise Three Courses in Coaching To Be Thursday Program of Debate Institute Women with the ten highest averages in each class will be hon­ Director Douglas A. Fessenden Announces Classes; ored at a “Smarty Party” given by Instructors Say Success Largely Due to Speakers, Major Sports, Training, Six Man Football Mortar board at 8 o’clock next Critiques, Adequacy of University Facilities; Thursday in the large meeting On Two Weeks’ Program in July room, announced Ann Picchioni, Cold Weather Cuts Attendance Klein, chairman, yesterday. Douglas A. Fessenden, head Grizzly coach and director of Mrs. DeLoss Smith, Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • BIG HOLE National Battlefield
    BIG HOLE National Battlefield Historical Research Management Plan & Bibliography of the ERCE WAR, 1877 F 737 .B48H35 November 1967 Historical Research Management Plan BIG HOLE NATI ONAL for .BATILEFIELD LI BRP..RY BIG HOLE Na tional Battlefield & Bibliog raphy of the N E Z PERCE WAR, 1877 By AUBREY L. HAINES DIVISION OF HISTORY Office of Archeology and Historic Preservatio.n November 1967 U.S. Department of the Interior NATI ONAL PARK SERVICE HISTORICAL RESEARCH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR BIG HOLE NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD November 1968 Recommended Superintendent Date Reviewed Division of History Date Approved Chief, Office of Archeology Date and Historic Preservation i TABLE OF CONTENTS Historical Research Management Plan Approval Sheet I. The Park Story and Purpose . • • • 1 A. The Main His torical Theme ••••••• 1 B. Sub sidiary Historical Theme • • • • • 1 1 c. Relationship of Historical Themes to Natural History and Anthropology • • • • • • • • 12 D. Statement of Historical Significance •• 14 E. Reasons for Establishment of the Park • • • • • 15 II. Historical Resources of the Battlefield 1 7 A. Tangible Resources • • • • 17 1. Sites and Remains 1 7 a. Those Related to the Main Park Theme • • . 1 7 b. Those Related to Subsidiary Themes • 25 2. Historic Structures 27 B. Intangible Resources • 2 7 c. Other Resources 2 8 III.Status of Research •• 2 9 A. Research Accomplished 29 H. Research in Progress • • • • • 3o c. Cooperation with Non-Service Institutions 36 IV. Research Needs ••••••••••••••••• 37 A. Site Identification and Evaluation Studies 37 H. General Background Studies and Survey Histories 40 c. Studies for Interpretive Development • • • • • 4 1 D. Development Studies • • • • • • • • • 4 1 E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sacagawea Mystique: Her Age, Name, Role and Final Destiny Columbia Magazine, Fall 1999: Vol
    History Commentary - The Sacagawea Mystique: Her Age, Name, Role and Final Destiny Columbia Magazine, Fall 1999: Vol. 13, No. 3 By Irving W. Anderson EDITOR'S NOTE The United States Mint has announced the design for a new dollar coin bearing a conceptual likeness of Sacagawea on the front and the American eagle on the back. It will replace and be about the same size as the current Susan B. Anthony dollar but will be colored gold and have an edge distinct from the quarter. Irving W. Anderson has provided this biographical essay on Sacagawea, the Shoshoni Indian woman member of the Lewis and Clark expedition, as background information prefacing the issuance of the new dollar. THE RECORD OF the 1804-06 "Corps of Volunteers on an Expedition of North Western Discovery" (the title Lewis and Clark used) is our nation's "living history" legacy of documented exploration across our fledgling republic's pristine western frontier. It is a story written in inspired spelling and with an urgent sense of purpose by ordinary people who accomplished extraordinary deeds. Unfortunately, much 20th-century secondary literature has created lasting though inaccurate versions of expedition events and the roles of its members. Among the most divergent of these are contributions to the exploring enterprise made by its Shoshoni Indian woman member, Sacagawea, and her destiny afterward. The intent of this text is to correct America's popular but erroneous public image of Sacagawea by relating excerpts of her actual life story as recorded in the writings of her contemporaries, people who actually knew her, two centuries ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Naturalist
    NatMuONTANAralisWinter 2012-2013t Why can’t we just get along? Hiking Columbia Mountain Birds in Snow Stargazing and More page 9 Connecting People with Nature WINTER 2012-13 MONTANA NATURALIST TO PROMOTE AND CULTIVATE THE APPRECIATION, UNDERSTANDING AND STEWARDSHIP OF NATURE THROUGH EDUCATION inside Winter 2012-2013 NatMuONTANAralist Features 4 Sharing the Land A local non-profit helps make it happen by Caroline Kurtz 6 What Is Wild? Searching for an answer on Columbia Mountain by Matt Holloway 4 Departments 3 Tidings 9 Get Outside Guide What’s that star?; the search for exoplanets; whitebark pine ecology and more Special 6 13 Community Focus Pull-Out Beginning beekeepers, buzzing bees Section 14 Far Afield Snowed In! Birdwatching in a blizzard 16 Imprints 2012 honorees; fall celebration thank yous 18 Magpie Market 9 13 19 Reflections Under the Oak intaglio print by Elizabeth Claire Rose Cover – A Grizzly Bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) feeds along the shore of Yellowstone Lake as a snow storm blows in on a cold Fall afternoon in Yellowstone National Park. Captured with a Canon 7D and 70-200/2.8L IS II in aperture priority mode with an exposure bias of + 2/3 at ISO400, f/2.8, and 1/500th of a second. The camera was handheld. This bear was photographed while leading Rocky Mountain College students on a class trip for ART243 - 14 16 Nature Photography. Photographer Dave Shumway is the staff photographer and adjunct instructor of photography for Rocky Mountain College in Billings, Montana. Dave has two passions, one for the outdoors and one for photography.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Recreational Trails Program Project Proposals
    2020 Recreational Trails Program Project Proposals Request RTP Request Organization Name Project Title Project Type Category Amount 1 Absaroka Beartooth Trail Stewardship Program: Hiring & Utilizing Trail Stewards and Non-Motorized Standard $37,522.00 Wilderness Foundation Volunteers to tackle Trail Maintenance projects in the Absaroka- Beartooth Wilderness Area 2 Anaconda Community Washoe Park Trail Phase II: Restoration on 0.13 miles of the trail of Non-Motorized Standard $33,221.24 Foundation a mile-long trail network in Anaconda-Deer Lodge 3 Back Country Horsemen of Volunteer Trail Maintenance on the CDT: Maintain the Continental Diversified Standard $66,300.00 Montana Divide National Scenic Trail in Montana and feeder trails 4 Beartooth Recreational Trails Winter Trail Maintenance: Winter Grooming on 5.3 miles of West Diversified Standard $20,000.00 Association Fork Road and 9.3 miles of trails on Aspen Ridge Ranch near Red Lodge 5 Big Sandy, Town of Town of Big Sandy Safe Route to Schools Project: Construction of Non-Motorized Standard $60,560.00 0.3 miles of trail connecting F. E. Miley Elementary School to existing trail infrastructure in Big Sandy 6 Big Sky Community Improvements to the Ousel Falls/US Forest Service Yellowmules Non-Motorized Standard $55,000.00 Organization trailhead to add infrastructure and improve land stewardship 7 Billings, City of Manufacture and installation of 105 wayfinding signs covering Non-Motorized Standard $36,390.00 nearly 10.5 miles of trails in Billings 8 Bitter Root Land Trust, Inc. Acquisition
    [Show full text]