Decapoda, Brachyura) from Thenwmediterraneancoast

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Decapoda, Brachyura) from Thenwmediterraneancoast PROTIST-BRYOZOAN-CRUSTACEANHYPEREPIBIOSIS ON GONEPLAX RHOMBOIDES (LINNAEUS,1758) (DECAPODA, BRACHYURA) FROM THENW MEDITERRANEANCOAST BY GREGORIO FERNANDEZ-LEBORANS 1/ Departamentode BiologiaAnimal I (Zoologia),Facultad de Biologia, Pnta 9, UniversidadComplutense, E-28040 Madrid, Spain ABSTRACT Aprotist-bryozoan-crustaceanhyperepibiosis was observed on specimens of the brachyuran decapod Goneplaxrhomboides collectedon the NW Mediterraneancoast. The primary epibionts werectenostomate bryozoans of the species Triticella ava .Thesecondary epibionts were ciliate protists (Zoothamnium , Cothurnia, and Corynophrya ).Thebryozoans were located on thefollowing areasof thecrab: ocular orbits, maxillae, maxillipeds, chelipeds, pereiopods, dorsal carapace, ventral cephalothorax,abdomen, and carapace areas between the pereiopods. Ciliate protists were attached indistinctlyto any of the surfaces of the bryozoans. The maximum number of bryozoans per crab was943, and of ciliates per crab, 1,466. Data regarding the number of bryozoans and ciliates on eachsurface area of thecrab are presented. Statistical analysis was carried out in order to relate the variousanatomical units of the crab with the epibionts present. There was a signicant correlation betweenthe size (i.e., width) of the crab and the number of bryozoanepibionts. There also was a signicant correlation between the number of bryozoans and the number of ciliates per crab. The dataobtained were compared with those corresponding to other specimens of Goneplaxrhomboides previouslysampled in the same geographical area that showed the same ciliates, but in that case adheringdirectly to thesurface of the crab. There was a signicant correlation between specimens of G.rhomboides withand without bryozoan epibionts with respect to thenumber of individualsof Cothurnia oneach anatomical unit of the crab. In addition, there also was a signicant difference betweencrabs with and without bryozoans epibionts as tothe number of protistepibionts on each surfacearea of the crustacean. RESUMEN Unahiperepibiosis protista-briozoo-crus táceo fue observada en especí menes del decá podo braqui- uro Goneplaxrhomboides recolectadosen la costaNW delMediterrá neo. Los epibiontes primarios fueronbriozoos ctenostomados de la especie Triticella ava .Losepibiontes secundarios fueron pro- tistasciliados ( Zoothamnium,Cothurnia y Corynophrya ).Los briozoos estaban localizados en las 1/ e-mail:[email protected] © KoninklijkeBrill NV ,Leiden,2003 Crustaceana 76(4):479-497 Alsoavailable online: www.brill.nl 480 GREGORIO FERNANDEZ-LEBORANS siguientesá reasdel cangrejo: ó rbitasoculares, maxilas, maxilí pedos, quelí pedos, pereió podos, ca- parazón dorsal,cefalotó rax ventral, abdomen, y áreasdel caparazó n entrelos pereió podos. Los pro- tistasciliados estaban adheridos indistintamente a cualquiersuper cie de los briozoos. El máximo número de briozoospor cangrejo fué de 943, y eldeciliadospor cangrejo, 1.466. Se muestrandatos relativosal número de briozoosy ciliadosen cadaá reasuper cial del cangrejo. Se harealizadoun análisis estadí stico para relacionar las diversas unidades anató micas del cangrejo y losepibiontes pre- sentes.Hay una correlació n signicativa entre el tamaño (p.ej.la anchura) del cangrejo y elnú mero debriozoos epibiontes. T ambién hayuna correlació n signicativa entre el nú mero de briozoos y elnúmero de ciliadospor cangrejo. Los datos obtenidos se compararon con los correspondientes a otrosejemplares de Goneplaxrhomboides recolectadospreviamente en la misma á reageográ ca, quemostraron los mismos ciliados, aunque en este caso adheridos directamente a lasuper cie del cangrejo.Hay una correlació n signicativa entre especí menes de G.rhomboides cony sinbriozoos epibiontesrespecto al nú mero de individuos de Cothurnia encadaunidad anató mica del cangrejo. Además, hay una diferencia signi cativa entre cangrejos con y sinbriozoos epibiontes respecto al número de protistas epibiontes en cada á reade la super cie del crustá ceo. INTRODUCTION Epibiosis is acommonphenomenon in marine and,indeed, all aquatic environ- ments (Wahl,1989). W ater turbulencehas inducedthat manylight-weight organ- isms havedeveloped some typeof attachment mechanism in evolutionaryhistory. Inor onmuddy or sandybottoms, the available space is animportant factor for species needinga hard,stable substratum forgrowth. In areas with densepopula- tions, wherecompetition forsuch a substrate is intense, the use ofas yet unocup- piedsurfaces is probablyone of the advantagesgained by organisms that devel- opedthe possibility to colonizeliving substrata (Jackson,1977; Connel & Keough, 1985).Epibiosis is afacultative association oftwo organisms: the epibiontand the basibiont (Wahl,1989). The term “epibiont”includes organisms that, duringthe sessile phaseof their life cycle,are attached to the surface ofa livingsubstratum, while the basibiont lodgesand constitutes asupportfor the epibiont(Threlkeld et al., 1993).Both concepts describe ecological functions(Wahl, 1989). Bryozoansare well-knowncolonizers oflive benthicsubtrata, andhave been describedas epizonts oncrabs,isopods, gastropods, and holothurians (Colodey et al., 1980;Ingle, 1983; Moyano, 1989; Abelló et al., 1990;Mori &Manconi,1990; Cadee,1991). Bryozoans can also attach themselves to gastropodshells that lodge hermit crabs (Gordon,1972; Key et al., 1996). Therole ofciliate protists as epibionts oncrustaceans has probablyreceived less attention thanthat ofother organisms suchas hydrozoans,bryozoans, cir- ripedes,and polychaetes (Sprague & Couch,1971). Several crustacean groups, e.g.,cladocerans, copepods, cirripedes, isopods,amphipods, and decapods, include forms that are hosts formacroepibiont invertebrates (Ross, 1983),and for proto- zoanmicroepibionts ofthe phylumCiliophora: apostomatids, chonotrichids,suc- torians, peritrichs, andheterotrichids (Corliss, 1979;Small &Lynn,1985; Morado .
Recommended publications
  • Studies of a Goneplax Rhomboides Population Off Quarry Bay 55
    Studies of a Goneplax rhomboides population off Quarry Bay R. J. A. ATKINSON Dept of Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Isle of Man Present address: University Marine Biological Station, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland. Introduction This work was conducted during a course in sublittoral marine ecology sponsored by the Lundy Field Society and the Department of Marine Biology, University College of North Wa les, Menai Bridge, Anglesey. The observations reported here result from a team effort in volving Mr. A.R. Andrews, Miss M. Cooper, Mr. J. Creak, Mr. M. Davies, Dr. P.M. Hardy , Mr. J.B . Markham , Mr . C. Roberts, Mr. D. Tierney, Mr. J.G. Wilson and myself. The main objects of the exercise were to familiarise ourselves with various types of burows in the mud and employ a number of techniques to study them. This involved the preparation of polyester resin casts of selected burrows, mapping the distribution of burrows and observing the area by night as well as by day. Although Goneplax rhomboides (L.) was responsible for must of the conspicuous burrows in the area several distinctive burrows occupied by the Red Band Fish (Cepola rnbescens L.) were fou nd .. The squat lobster Munida bamffica (Pennant) was occasionally seen in th e en­ trances of burrows but these burrows appeared to be vacated Goneplax burrows. Methods A 48 metre tape measure was pinned into the mud substratum 17m below C.D. off Quarry Bay. Those burrows that occurred within lm either side of the tape were mapped using pencils on prepared perspex 'slates'. Interrelationships between holes in th e mud we re ascertained by creating a current of water in the burrow and noting those openings through which mud clouds emerged.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mediterranean Decapod and Stomatopod Crustacea in A
    ANNALES DU MUSEUM D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE DE NICE Tome V, 1977, pp. 37-88. THE MEDITERRANEAN DECAPOD AND STOMATOPOD CRUSTACEA IN A. RISSO'S PUBLISHED WORKS AND MANUSCRIPTS by L. B. HOLTHUIS Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, Netherlands CONTENTS Risso's 1841 and 1844 guides, which contain a simple unannotated list of Crustacea found near Nice. 1. Introduction 37 Most of Risso's descriptions are quite satisfactory 2. The importance and quality of Risso's carcino- and several species were figured by him. This caused logical work 38 that most of his names were immediately accepted by 3. List of Decapod and Stomatopod species in Risso's his contemporaries and a great number of them is dealt publications and manuscripts 40 with in handbooks like H. Milne Edwards (1834-1840) Penaeidea 40 "Histoire naturelle des Crustaces", and Heller's (1863) Stenopodidea 46 "Die Crustaceen des siidlichen Europa". This made that Caridea 46 Risso's names at present are widely accepted, and that Macrura Reptantia 55 his works are fundamental for a study of Mediterranean Anomura 58 Brachyura 62 Decapods. Stomatopoda 76 Although most of Risso's descriptions are readily 4. New genera proposed by Risso (published and recognizable, there is a number that have caused later unpublished) 76 authors much difficulty. In these cases the descriptions 5. List of Risso's manuscripts dealing with Decapod were not sufficiently complete or partly erroneous, and Stomatopod Crustacea 77 the names given by Risso were either interpreted in 6. Literature 7S different ways and so caused confusion, or were entirely ignored. It is a very fortunate circumstance that many of 1.
    [Show full text]
  • DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project
    DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project March 2018 DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project Citation: Aguilar, R., García, S., Perry, A.L., Alvarez, H., Blanco, J., Bitar, G. 2018. 2016 Deep-sea Lebanon Expedition: Exploring Submarine Canyons. Oceana, Madrid. 94 p. DOI: 10.31230/osf.io/34cb9 Based on an official request from Lebanon’s Ministry of Environment back in 2013, Oceana has planned and carried out an expedition to survey Lebanese deep-sea canyons and escarpments. Cover: Cerianthus membranaceus © OCEANA All photos are © OCEANA Index 06 Introduction 11 Methods 16 Results 44 Areas 12 Rov surveys 16 Habitat types 44 Tarablus/Batroun 14 Infaunal surveys 16 Coralligenous habitat 44 Jounieh 14 Oceanographic and rhodolith/maërl 45 St. George beds measurements 46 Beirut 19 Sandy bottoms 15 Data analyses 46 Sayniq 15 Collaborations 20 Sandy-muddy bottoms 20 Rocky bottoms 22 Canyon heads 22 Bathyal muds 24 Species 27 Fishes 29 Crustaceans 30 Echinoderms 31 Cnidarians 36 Sponges 38 Molluscs 40 Bryozoans 40 Brachiopods 42 Tunicates 42 Annelids 42 Foraminifera 42 Algae | Deep sea Lebanon OCEANA 47 Human 50 Discussion and 68 Annex 1 85 Annex 2 impacts conclusions 68 Table A1. List of 85 Methodology for 47 Marine litter 51 Main expedition species identified assesing relative 49 Fisheries findings 84 Table A2. List conservation interest of 49 Other observations 52 Key community of threatened types and their species identified survey areas ecological importanc 84 Figure A1.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance and Diversity of Decapod Crustaceans in the Deep-Catalan Sea (Western Mediterranean)
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL HISTORY, 1992, 26, 1305-1323 Abundance and diversity of decapod crustaceans in the deep-Catalan Sea (Western Mediterranean) J. E. CARTES and F. SARDA Institut de Ciencies del Mar, Passeig National s/n, 08039 Barcelona, Spain (Accepted 7 August 1992) The deep-slope decapod fauna of the Catalan Sea was extensively sampled with an OTSB-14 bottom trawl. A total of 67 bottom tows were taken from 1985 to 1989 at bottom depths ranging from 552 to 2261 m. Species in which abundance decreased with depth were Plesionika acanthonotus, Polycheles typhlops, Calocaris macandreae and Geryon longipes. Highest densities of Acanthephyra eximia, Stereomastis sculpta, and Nematocarcinus exilis were attained at the great­ est depths studied. Total abundance, biomass and species richness for decapod crustaceans as a whole decreased with depth. Maximum decapod biomass and diversity occurred on the upper-middle slope on soft bottoms in the .Catalan Sea and in all regions for which data were available. In the Catalan Sea, an oligotrophic area, the abundance of decapods as a group seemed to be higher than in north- Atlantic eutrophic regions. In these latter areas, other deep-sea benthic invertebrate groups, particularly ophiuroids, predominate. KEYWORDS: Decapod crustaceans, Mediterranean, abundance, biomass, diversity. Introduction The deep-sea decapod crustacean fauna in the Mediterranean has been only quali­ tatively studied (Carpine, 1970a; Reyss, 1971; Fredj and Laubier, 1985; Peres, 1985; Abello and Valladares, 1988; Cartes, 1992 and references cited). Data on abundance, biomass and on the dominant species along the deep slope are particularly scarce. The structure of bathyal decapod crustacean populations on the upper slope in the northwestern Mediterranean is relatively well known (Zariquiey Alvarez, 1968; Sarda and Palomera, 1981; Abello et al., 1988) down to a depth of 800 m, with data on species abundance and biomass also available.
    [Show full text]
  • Macrobenthic Communities in a Fishery Exclusion Zone and in a Trawled Area of the Middle Adriatic Sea (Italy)
    Ciencias Marinas (2008), 34(4): 433–444 http://dx.doi.org/10.7773/cm.v34i4.1382 Macrobenthic communities in a fishery exclusion zone and in a trawled area of the middle Adriatic Sea (Italy) Comunidades macrobénticas en una zona vedada a la pesca y en una zona de pesca de arrastre en la parte central del Mar Adriático (Italia) AM De Biasi*, L Pacciardi Centro Interuniversitario di Biologia Marina ed Ecologia Applicata, V. le N. Sauro 4, I-57127 Livorno, Italy. * E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Macrobenthic communities in a commercial fishing ground (middle Adriatic Sea) exploited by otter trawling were compared with communities living in an area closed to fishing for over 10 years located near a gas platform. Our data highlighted significant differences in macrofaunal community structure between the two areas. In addition, the macrofaunal communities in the fished area displayed evidence of a higher level of stress compared with the other one. Several taxa reported in the literature as being sensitive to trawling (e.g., Ebalia tuberosa, Callianassa subterranea) were markedly more abundant in the area not affected by fishing. Macrofaunal community analysis using the index of multivariate dispersion and k-dominance curves provided evidence of stress in the fished area; however, it is not possible to predict whether the patterns observed will remain consistent over time based on only two temporal replicates. It is likely that the magnitude of the macrofaunal community response to fishing changes during the year according to season and fishing effort. Key words: bottom trawling, ecosystem disturbance, middle Adriatic Sea, sediment distribution, zoobenthos.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Shallow Marine Ichnology: a Modern Perspective
    Vol. 2: 255–268, 2008 AQUATIC BIOLOGY Printed June 2008 doi: 10.3354/ab00055 Aquat Biol Published online June 19, 2008 Contribution to the Theme Section ‘Bioturbation in aquatic environments: linking past and present’ OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Biology of shallow marine ichnology: a modern perspective Murray K. Gingras1,*, Shahin E. Dashtgard2, James A. MacEachern2, S. George Pemberton1 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, 1-26 Earth Science Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3, Canada 2Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada ABSTRACT: This study considers the construction and functionality of biogenic structures made by marine, vermiform nemerteans, polychaetes and hemichordates; marine crustaceans; motile bivalves; motile echinoderms; and sponges and sea anemones. We report on a range of modern biogenic struc- tures similar to several known ichnogenera. Vermiform animals dominantly occupy vertical burrows that range from simple through helical shafts to Y- and U-shapes. Horizontal traces made by worms range in form, but are dominated by branching and variably sinuous to meandering burrows. Crustaceans primarily excavate open burrow systems that possess a range of architectures that are similar to either Thalassinoides or Psilonichnus. Smaller crustaceans, such as amphipods, mix the sediment. Bivalve traces vary in form, but generally preserve evidence of vertically oriented filter or interface-deposit feed- ing from a stationary location, rapid vertical escape, or horizontal grazing. Echinoderms dominantly pre- serve body impressions and motility traces, such as Asteriacites. An important class of biogenic structure, Scolicia and Bichordites, are made by urchins. Finally, sea anemones can generate large, penetrative, conical biogenic structures.
    [Show full text]
  • 132825345.Pdf
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Thessaly Institutional Repository ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΙΑΣ ΣΧΟΛΗ ΓΕΩΠΟΝΙΚΩΝ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΩΝ ΤΜΗΜΑ ΓΕΩΠΟΝΙΑΣ, ΙΧΘΥΟΛΟΓΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΥΔΑΤΙΝΟΥ ΠΕΡΙΒΑΛΛΟΝΤΟΣ ΠΤΥΧΙΑΚΗ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑ ΠΛΗΘΥΣΜΙΑΚΗ ΚΑΤΑΝΟΜΗ ΤΩΝ ΚΑΒΟΥΡΙΩΝ LIOCARCINUS DEPURATOR ΚΑΙ GONEPLAX RHOMBOIDES ΣΤΟΝ ΠΑΓΑΣΗΤΙΚΟ ΚΟΛΠΟ. Σαββάκης Εμμανουήλ Βόλος 2013-2014 1 Institutional Repository - Library & Information Centre - University of Thessaly 09/12/2017 13:02:29 EET - 137.108.70.7 ΠΕΡΙΕΧΟΜΕΝΑ 1. ΕΙΣΑΓΩΓΗ 1.1. Αντικείμενο και στόχοι της έρευνας ………………………………….....…4 1.2. Αρθρόποδα, δεκάποδα και καβούρια…………………………………....…5 1.3. Παγασητικός Κόλπος ……………………………………………………….11 1.4. Είδος goneplax rhomboides …………………………………………….....12 1.4.1. Γεωγραφική κατανομή……………………………………………….13 1.4.2. Μορφολογία………………………………………………………….13 1.5. Είδος liocarcinus depurator ……………………………………………….15 1.5.1. Διατροφή……………………………………………………………..16 1.5.2. Χωρική κατανομή και προτίμηση ενδιαιτήματος του είδους……….17 1.5.3. Αναπαραγωγή………………………………………………………...18 2. ΥΛΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΙ ………………………………………………………..19 2.1. Δειγματοληψίες……………………………………………………………...19 2.2. Μορφομετρικές μετρήσεις ………………………………………………….20 3. ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΜΑΤΑ……………………………………………………………...23 3.1. Αλλομετρικές σχέσεις Liocarcinus depurator……………………………....23 3.2. Αλλομετρικές σχέσεις Goneplax rhomboides……………………………….26 3.3. Κλάσεις μεγέθους Liocarcinus depurator…………………………………..30 3.4. Κλάσεις μεγέθους Goneplax rhomboides……………………………………31 3.5. Εκτίμηση ηλικιακών ομάδων………………………………………………..32
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of the Biologically Relevant Sampling Depth for Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessments
    EPA/600/R-15/176 ERASC-015F October 2015 DETERMINATION OF THE BIOLOGICALLY RELEVANT SAMPLING DEPTH FOR TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENTS Ecological Risk Assessment Support Center National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, OH NOTICE This document has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Cover art on left-hand side is an adaptation of illustrations in two Soil Quality Information Sheets published by the USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service in May 2001: 1) Rangeland Sheet 6, Rangeland Soil Quality—Organic Matter, and 2) Rangeland Sheet 8, Rangeland Soil Quality—Soil Biota. Cover art on right-hand side is an adaptation of an illustration from Life in the Chesapeake Bay, by Alice Jane Lippson and Robert L. Lippson, published by Johns Hopkins University Press, 2715 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218. Preferred Citation: U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2015. Determination of the Biologically Relevant Sampling Depth for Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessments. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Ecological Risk Assessment Support Center, Cincinnati, OH. EPA/600/R-15/176. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mediterranean Marine Science Vol
    Mediterranean Marine Science Vol. 5/2, 2004, 53-64 Key for the identification of Mediterranean brachyuran megalopae D. PESSANI, T. TIRELLI & S. FLAGELLA Dipartimento di Biologia Animale e dell’Uomo, Via Accademia Albertina 17, 10123 Torino, Italy e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Based on larval literature, an identification key has been constructed for the megalopae of 55 species of Mediterranean Brachyura. This key is based mainly on external morphological characteristics visible, by using a microscope, limiting the necessity for dissection of specimens. Characteristics used include presence/absence of ornamentation on the carapace, number of abdominal somites, number and position of setae and/or spines on antennula, antenna, pereiopods and structure of uropods, etc. Partial dissection is only required to count the setae on the scaphognathite margin. Using the above characters, it is also possible to gather almost all the families into groups. However, the megalopae of Portunidae as well as those of the three species of Brachynotus genus are similar to each other and their identification at a specific level requires the use of features somehow variable and difficult to count. In the Majidae, the megalopae of 14 species are already known. The complexity of morphological characters typical of this family makes it difficult to define characters common to all spider crab megalopae. Nevertheless, the key may be an aid for carcinology studies, especially those including sorting and identification of megalopae from plankton samples. Keywords: Larval development; Larval morphology; Key; Decapoda; Brachyura; Mediterranean Sea. Introduction obtaining this phase usually results in a high zoeal mortality. The larval development of Brachyura Of the 138 species of Brachyura totally present (Crustacea, Decapoda) includes two or more in the Mediterranean (d’Udekem d’Acoz, 1999), planktonic stages of zoea and the plankto- one or more zoeal stages are known for 78 benthonic stage of megalopa.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Kent's Wildlife
    TheKent’s State of Wildlife in 2011 Kent Biodiversity Partnership Action for Kent’s wildlife Contents Introduction 1 Kent’s Butterflies Mike Easterbrook Butterfly Conservation -Kent 2 Kent’s Moths Ian Ferguson & David Gardner Butterfly Conservation -Kent 5 Kent’s Amphibians and Reptiles Dr Lee Brady Kent Reptile and Amphibian Group 10 Kent’s Birds Andrew Henderson Kent Ornithological Society 18 Kent’s Bats Shirley Thompson Kent Bat Group 26 Kent’s Wild Plants Richard Moyse Kent Wildlife Trust 33 Kent’s Marine Wildlife Bryony Chapman, Kent Wildlife Trust 39 The State of Kent’s Wildlife in 2011 Kent is one the UK’s most wildlife-rich bird species, and two species of bat all counties, a result of its varied geology, became extinct in the county. This long coastline, landscape history, excludes consideration of groups not southerly location and proximity to covered in the following chapters; for mainland Europe. Its important wildlife example, the Red Squirrel and 3 species habitats include estuaries, chalk cliffs, of bumblebee were also lost during the woodlands, and chalk downland, and 20th century. In addition to this, many of encompass some of the South East’s the species that remain have seen big most iconic landscapes, such as the population declines, including many shingle headland of Dungeness and species of butterflies and moths, birds the White Cliffs of Dover. and wildflowers of farmland, wetland plants, Adders and Common Toads. This publication has been prepared by Kent natural historians to give an As seen in the following chapters, the outline of the changing fortunes of causes of these losses and declines are Kent’s wild plants and animals over the various.
    [Show full text]
  • Decapoda, Brachyura, Goneplacidae
    TWONEW SPECIES OF THEGENUS GONEPLAX (DECAPODA, BRACHYURA,GONEPLACIDAE) FROM EAST ASIA BY HIRONORI KOMATSU andMASA TSUNE TAKEDA Departmentof Zoology, National Science Museum, 3-23-1 Hyakunincho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo169-0073, Japan ABSTRACT Twonew species of goneplacid crab, Goneplaxmarivenae and G. megalops,aredescribed from thePhilippines and Japan, respectively. Both new species are closely similar to G. sigsbei (A. Milne- Edwards,1880) from the western Atlantic Ocean in the form of the carapace, eyestalk, fourth ambulatoryleg, and male pleopods, but can be distinguished from G. sigsbei bythe form of the orbit.Both new species are also similar to G.maldivensis Rathbun,1902, but are distinguished from G.maldivensis bythe form of themale abdomen. Goneplaxmarivenae ismost closely similar to G. megalops,butcan be distinguishedfrom G. megalops bytheform of theextraorbital tooth and themale rstpleopod. RÉSUMÉ Deuxespè ces nouvelles de crabes Goneplacidae, Goneplaxmarivenae et G. megalops, sont décrites respectivement, des Philippines et du Japon. Les deux espè ces nouvelles sont trè s prochesde G. sigsbei (A.Milne-Edwards, 1880) de l’océ an Atlantique occidental par la formede lacarapace, les pédoncules oculaires, la quatrième patte ambulatoire, et les plé opodes mâ les, mais s’ en distinguent parla forme de l’ orbite. Les deux nouvelles espè ces ressemblent é galementà G.maldivensis Rathbun,1902, mais s’ en distinguent par la forme de l’ abdomen mâ le. Goneplaxmarivenae est leplus proche de G. megalops,maisen diffè re par la forme des dents extraorbitales et le premier pléopode mâ le. INTRODUCTION The genus Goneplax Leach,1814 currently consists oftwospecies fromthe At- lantic Ocean,viz., G.rhomboides (Linnaeus,1758) (the typespecies) and G.
    [Show full text]