Southern Trench Possible Mpa June 2019 Draft

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Southern Trench Possible Mpa June 2019 Draft Conservation and Management Advice SOUTHERN TRENCH POSSIBLE MPA JUNE 2019 DRAFT This document provides advice to Public Authorities and stakeholders about the activities that may affect the protected features of Southern Trench possible Marine Protected Area (pMPA). It provides advice from Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) under Section 80 of the Marine (Scotland) Act 2010 and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) under Section 127 of the Marine & Coastal Access Act (2009) to public authorities as to matters which are capable of damaging or otherwise affecting the protected features of MPAs, how the Conservation Objectives of the site may be furthered or their achievement hindered, and how the effects of activities on MPAs may be mitigated. It covers a range of different activities and developments but is not exhaustive. It focuses on where there is a risk to achieving the Conservation Objectives. The paper does not attempt to cover all possible future activities or eventualities (e.g. as a result of accidents), and does not consider cumulative effects. Further information on marine protected areas and management is available at - https://www2.gov.scot/Topics/marine/marine-environment/mpanetwork For the full range of MPA site documents and more on the fascinating range of marine life to be found in Scotland’s seas, please visit - www.nature.scot/mpas or www.jncc.defra.gov.uk/scottishmpas Document version control Version Date Author Reason / Comments 1 26/11/2018 Sam Black Transferring initial draft conservation advice into new template and updating/completing 2 18/01/2019 Sam Black, Chris Adding/editing ecosystem function, Leakey natural resources and wider benefits information 3 08/02/2019 Sarah Review of document and minke whale Cunningham, text Annex 1 Fiona Manson 4 18/02/2019 Sam Black, Nick Geodiversity conservation objectives Everett, Ness and ecosystem services infographic Kirkbride 5 15/03/2019 Lisa Kamphausen Completion of research and survey requirements 6 21/03/2019 Sarah Update to species licensing references Cunningham in Annex 1 and cleared some comments that were dealt with. 7 28/03/2019 Sarah Final QA Cunningham 8 04/04/2019 Sarah Insertion of Figure 3. Review of Cunningham, fisheries related text and climate David Donnan, change text. Addition of paragraph on Sam Black seaweed harvesting and text on military activities. Checking footnotes. Updating scale bar on adjusted density map for minke whale and addition of burrowed mud data from MS suitable Nephrops ground layer to map. 9 14/05/19 Sarah Revision following Marine Scotland Cunningham, comments. Sam Black 10 21/05/19 Sarah Addition on information on Section 127 Cunningham, of the Marine & Coastal Access Act Sam Black. (2009) following endorsement by JNCC. Edits following additional comments from Marine Scotland. 11 06/06/19 Sarah Accepting track changes for final Cunningham version 2 Distribution list Format Version Issue date Issued to Electronic 6 21/03/2019 Gayle Holland Marine Scotland LOT Lily Burke, Elaine Tait, Finlay Bennet Marine Scotland Electronic 7 29/03/2019 Katie Gillham for sign off Electronic 8 05/04/2019 Marine Scotland officials. Electronic 9 15/05/2019 Marine Scotland officials. Electronic 9 17/05/2019 Peter Chaniotis JNCC. Electronic 11 06/06/2019 Marine Scotland officials. 3 Contents 1 OVERVIEW OF DOCUMENT ............................................................................. 5 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 5 2.1 PURPOSE STATEMENT ........................................................................................ 5 2.2 CONSERVATION BENEFITS ................................................................................... 5 2.3 WIDER BENEFITS ................................................................................................ 5 2.4 CONTRIBUTION TO POLICY COMMITMENTS ............................................................ 8 3 ROLES ................................................................................................................ 8 4 PROTECTED FEATURES AND STATUS .......................................................... 9 5 CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES ...................................................................... 12 5.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 12 5.2 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEATURE CONDITION AND CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES .. 12 6 FEATURE SENSITIVITY .................................................................................. 12 6.1 BURROWED MUD ............................................................................................. 12 6.2 MINKE WHALE .................................................................................................. 13 6.3 FRONTS .......................................................................................................... 13 6.4 SHELF DEEPS .................................................................................................. 13 6.5 QUATERNARY OF SCOTLAND (SUBGLACIAL TUNNEL VALLEYS AND MORAINES) ........ 13 6.6 SUBMARINE MASS MOVEMENT (SLIDE SCARS) .................................................... 14 7 MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................ 14 7.1 ADVICE TO SUPPORT MANAGEMENT ................................................................... 14 7.2 BEST PRACTICE ............................................................................................... 15 7.3 CONSERVATION MEASURES .............................................................................. 15 8 RESEARCH AND SURVEY REQUIREMENTS ................................................ 15 ANNEX 1. SOUTHERN TRENCH POSSIBLE MPA CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES .......................................................................................................... 25 HABITATS ...................................................................................................................... 30 MOBILE SPECIES .......................................................................................................... 35 GEOMORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES ............................................................................. 40 LARGE-SCALE FEATURES ........................................................................................... 44 ANNEX 2. SUPPORTING INFORMATION .............................................................. 49 FACTORS DETERMINING THE POTENTIAL FOR FEATURES TO RECOVER .......................... 49 FRONTS ................................................................................................................. 49 SHELF DEEPS .......................................................................................................... 49 QUATERNARY OF SCOTLAND (SUBGLACIAL TUNNEL VALLEYS AND MORAINES) ............... 49 SUBMARINE MASS MOVEMENT (SLIDE SCARS) ........................................................... 49 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................... 50 GLOSSARY FOR CONSERVATION OBJECTIVES ............................................................ 55 4 1 Overview of document This document provides details of the Conservation and Management Advice for Southern Trench possible Marine Protected Area (pMPA) and it is divided into eight main sections. The introduction in section 2 gives an overview of Southern Trench pMPA and its contribution in terms of conservation and wider benefits. Section 3 provides an overview of the roles of the various bodies involved with advising, regulating and managing the marine protected area. Section 4 describes the protected features and their condition, and section 5 introduces the Conservation Objectives for the site. Section 6 describes the threats and pressures to which the protected features are sensitive, and section 7 provides the management advice for these activities. Section 8 identifies what further research and surveys may be required to increase our understanding of how the protected features utilise the site for which they are designated. 2 Introduction 2.1 Purpose statement The Southern Trench pMPA has been proposed to protect four biodiversity features: burrowed mud, fronts, minke whale and shelf deeps; as well as two geodiversity features: Quaternary of Scotland and Submarine Mass Movement. By doing so it contributes to the Scottish, UK and OSPAR MPA networks, the conservation of the wider marine environment around Scotland and progress towards Good Environmental Status. The main purpose of the Southern Trench pMPA is to conserve the protected features in favourable condition. This makes a contribution to the OSPAR MPA network in the North-East Atlantic. 2.2 Conservation benefits Southern Trench pMPA provides conservation benefits by affording protection to burrowed mud, fronts, minke whales, shelf deeps and two geodiversity features. In summary the conservation benefits of this designation are: Protection for an area containing persistently above average densities of minke whale where both juvenile and adult whales are regularly observed feeding. An additional replicate of burrowed mud within a pMPA on the east coast of Scotland complementing the burrowed mud protected in the Central Fladden MPA, which is isolated in relation to water circulation. Conservation of the persistent front within the pMPA ensures that productivity and feeding conditions utilised by local
Recommended publications
  • High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project
    High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00 For: The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme Report issued 30 August 2002 (Version with minor corrections 16 September 2002) Keith Hiscock, Harvey Tyler-Walters and Hugh Jones Reference: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H. & Jones, H. 2002. High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Report from the Marine Biological Association to The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme. (AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00.) Correspondence: Dr. K. Hiscock, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB. [email protected] High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species ii High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species Title: High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Contract Report: W/35/00632/00/00. Client: Department of Trade and Industry (New & Renewable Energy Programme) Contract management: AEA Technology, Environment. Date of contract issue: 22/07/2002 Level of report issue: Final Confidentiality: Distribution at discretion of DTI before Consultation report published then no restriction. Distribution: Two copies and electronic file to DTI (Mr S. Payne, Offshore Renewables Planning). One copy to MBA library. Prepared by: Dr. K. Hiscock, Dr. H. Tyler-Walters & Hugh Jones Authorization: Project Director: Dr. Keith Hiscock Date: Signature: MBA Director: Prof. S. Hawkins Date: Signature: This report can be referred to as follows: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Neaxius Acanthus
    Wattenmeerstation Sylt The role of Neaxius acanthus (Thalassinidea: Strahlaxiidae) and its burrows in a tropical seagrass meadow, with some remarks on Corallianassa coutierei (Thalassinidea: Callianassidae) Diplomarbeit Institut für Biologie / Zoologie Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie und Pharmazie Freie Universität Berlin vorgelegt von Dominik Kneer Angefertigt an der Wattenmeerstation Sylt des Alfred-Wegener-Instituts für Polar- und Meeresforschung in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft In Zusammenarbeit mit dem Center for Coral Reef Research der Hasanuddin University Makassar, Indonesien Sylt, Mai 2006 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Thomas Bartolomaeus Institut für Biologie / Zoologie Freie Universität Berlin Berlin 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Walter Traunspurger Fakultät für Biologie / Tierökologie Universität Bielefeld Bielefeld Meinen Eltern (wem sonst…) Table of contents 4 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Zusammenfassung...................................................................................................................... 8 Abstrak ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................... 12 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Studies of a Goneplax Rhomboides Population Off Quarry Bay 55
    Studies of a Goneplax rhomboides population off Quarry Bay R. J. A. ATKINSON Dept of Marine Biology, University of Liverpool, Isle of Man Present address: University Marine Biological Station, Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland. Introduction This work was conducted during a course in sublittoral marine ecology sponsored by the Lundy Field Society and the Department of Marine Biology, University College of North Wa les, Menai Bridge, Anglesey. The observations reported here result from a team effort in volving Mr. A.R. Andrews, Miss M. Cooper, Mr. J. Creak, Mr. M. Davies, Dr. P.M. Hardy , Mr. J.B . Markham , Mr . C. Roberts, Mr. D. Tierney, Mr. J.G. Wilson and myself. The main objects of the exercise were to familiarise ourselves with various types of burows in the mud and employ a number of techniques to study them. This involved the preparation of polyester resin casts of selected burrows, mapping the distribution of burrows and observing the area by night as well as by day. Although Goneplax rhomboides (L.) was responsible for must of the conspicuous burrows in the area several distinctive burrows occupied by the Red Band Fish (Cepola rnbescens L.) were fou nd .. The squat lobster Munida bamffica (Pennant) was occasionally seen in th e en­ trances of burrows but these burrows appeared to be vacated Goneplax burrows. Methods A 48 metre tape measure was pinned into the mud substratum 17m below C.D. off Quarry Bay. Those burrows that occurred within lm either side of the tape were mapped using pencils on prepared perspex 'slates'. Interrelationships between holes in th e mud we re ascertained by creating a current of water in the burrow and noting those openings through which mud clouds emerged.
    [Show full text]
  • From Ghost and Mud Shrimp
    Zootaxa 4365 (3): 251–301 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4365.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C5AC71E8-2F60-448E-B50D-22B61AC11E6A Parasites (Isopoda: Epicaridea and Nematoda) from ghost and mud shrimp (Decapoda: Axiidea and Gebiidea) with descriptions of a new genus and a new species of bopyrid isopod and clarification of Pseudione Kossmann, 1881 CHRISTOPHER B. BOYKO1,4, JASON D. WILLIAMS2 & JEFFREY D. SHIELDS3 1Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West @ 79th St., New York, New York 10024, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York 11549, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Aquatic Health Sciences, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, P.O. Box 1346, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 4Corresponding author Table of contents Abstract . 252 Introduction . 252 Methods and materials . 253 Taxonomy . 253 Isopoda Latreille, 1817 . 253 Bopyroidea Rafinesque, 1815 . 253 Ionidae H. Milne Edwards, 1840. 253 Ione Latreille, 1818 . 253 Ione cornuta Bate, 1864 . 254 Ione thompsoni Richardson, 1904. 255 Ione thoracica (Montagu, 1808) . 256 Bopyridae Rafinesque, 1815 . 260 Pseudioninae Codreanu, 1967 . 260 Acrobelione Bourdon, 1981. 260 Acrobelione halimedae n. sp. 260 Key to females of species of Acrobelione Bourdon, 1981 . 262 Gyge Cornalia & Panceri, 1861. 262 Gyge branchialis Cornalia & Panceri, 1861 . 262 Gyge ovalis (Shiino, 1939) . 264 Ionella Bonnier, 1900 .
    [Show full text]
  • DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS of the 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project
    DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project March 2018 DEEP SEA LEBANON RESULTS OF THE 2016 EXPEDITION EXPLORING SUBMARINE CANYONS Towards Deep-Sea Conservation in Lebanon Project Citation: Aguilar, R., García, S., Perry, A.L., Alvarez, H., Blanco, J., Bitar, G. 2018. 2016 Deep-sea Lebanon Expedition: Exploring Submarine Canyons. Oceana, Madrid. 94 p. DOI: 10.31230/osf.io/34cb9 Based on an official request from Lebanon’s Ministry of Environment back in 2013, Oceana has planned and carried out an expedition to survey Lebanese deep-sea canyons and escarpments. Cover: Cerianthus membranaceus © OCEANA All photos are © OCEANA Index 06 Introduction 11 Methods 16 Results 44 Areas 12 Rov surveys 16 Habitat types 44 Tarablus/Batroun 14 Infaunal surveys 16 Coralligenous habitat 44 Jounieh 14 Oceanographic and rhodolith/maërl 45 St. George beds measurements 46 Beirut 19 Sandy bottoms 15 Data analyses 46 Sayniq 15 Collaborations 20 Sandy-muddy bottoms 20 Rocky bottoms 22 Canyon heads 22 Bathyal muds 24 Species 27 Fishes 29 Crustaceans 30 Echinoderms 31 Cnidarians 36 Sponges 38 Molluscs 40 Bryozoans 40 Brachiopods 42 Tunicates 42 Annelids 42 Foraminifera 42 Algae | Deep sea Lebanon OCEANA 47 Human 50 Discussion and 68 Annex 1 85 Annex 2 impacts conclusions 68 Table A1. List of 85 Methodology for 47 Marine litter 51 Main expedition species identified assesing relative 49 Fisheries findings 84 Table A2. List conservation interest of 49 Other observations 52 Key community of threatened types and their species identified survey areas ecological importanc 84 Figure A1.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics, Phylogeny, and Taphonomy of Ghost Shrimps (Decapoda): a Perspective from the Fossil Record
    73 (3): 401 – 437 23.12.2015 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2015. Systematics, phylogeny, and taphonomy of ghost shrimps (Decapoda): a perspective from the fossil record Matúš Hyžný *, 1, 2 & Adiël A. Klompmaker 3 1 Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria; Matúš Hyžný [hyzny.matus@ gmail.com] — 2 Department of Geology and Paleontology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina, Ilkovičova 6, SVK-842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia — 3 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Museum Road, PO Box 117800, Gaines- ville, FL 32611, USA; Adiël A. Klompmaker [[email protected]] — * Correspond ing author Accepted 06.viii.2015. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on 14.xii.2015. Editor in charge: Stefan Richter. Abstract Ghost shrimps of Callianassidae and Ctenochelidae are soft-bodied, usually heterochelous decapods representing major bioturbators of muddy and sandy (sub)marine substrates. Ghost shrimps have a robust fossil record spanning from the Early Cretaceous (~ 133 Ma) to the Holocene and their remains are present in most assemblages of Cenozoic decapod crustaceans. Their taxonomic interpretation is in flux, mainly because the generic assignment is hindered by their insufficient preservation and disagreement in the biological classification. Fur- thermore, numerous taxa are incorrectly classified within the catch-all taxonCallianassa . To show the historical patterns in describing fos- sil ghost shrimps and to evaluate taphonomic aspects influencing the attribution of ghost shrimp remains to higher level taxa, a database of all fossil species treated at some time as belonging to the group has been compiled: 250 / 274 species are considered valid ghost shrimp taxa herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of the Family Callianassidae, with Keys to Subfamilies, Genera and Species, and the Description of New Taxa (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea)
    ZV-326 (pp 03-152) 02-01-2007 14:37 Pagina 3 Synopsis of the family Callianassidae, with keys to subfamilies, genera and species, and the description of new taxa (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea) K. Sakai Sakai, K. Synopsis of the family Callianassidae, with keys to subfamilies, genera and species, and the description of new taxa (Crustacea: Decapoda: Thalassinidea). Zool. Verh. Leiden 326, 30.vii.1999: 1-152, figs 1-33.— ISSN 0024-1652/ISBN 90-73239-72-9. K. Sakai, Shikoku University, 771-1192 Tokushima, Japan, e-mail: [email protected]. Key words: Crustacea; Decapoda; Thalassinidae; Callianassidae; synopsis. A synopsis of the family Callianassidae is presented. Defenitions are given of the subfamilies and genera. Keys to the sufamilies, genera, as well as seperate keys to the species occurring in certain bio- geographical areas are provided. At least the synonymy, type-locality, and distribution of the species are listed. The following new taxa are described: Calliapaguropinae subfamily nov., Podocallichirus genus nov., Callianassa whitei spec. nov., Callianassa gruneri spec. nov., Callianassa ngochoae spec. nov., Neocallichirus kempi spec. nov. and Calliax doerjesti spec. nov. Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3 Systematics .............................................................................................................................. 7 Subfamily Calliapaguropinae nov. .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Macrobenthic Communities in a Fishery Exclusion Zone and in a Trawled Area of the Middle Adriatic Sea (Italy)
    Ciencias Marinas (2008), 34(4): 433–444 http://dx.doi.org/10.7773/cm.v34i4.1382 Macrobenthic communities in a fishery exclusion zone and in a trawled area of the middle Adriatic Sea (Italy) Comunidades macrobénticas en una zona vedada a la pesca y en una zona de pesca de arrastre en la parte central del Mar Adriático (Italia) AM De Biasi*, L Pacciardi Centro Interuniversitario di Biologia Marina ed Ecologia Applicata, V. le N. Sauro 4, I-57127 Livorno, Italy. * E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Macrobenthic communities in a commercial fishing ground (middle Adriatic Sea) exploited by otter trawling were compared with communities living in an area closed to fishing for over 10 years located near a gas platform. Our data highlighted significant differences in macrofaunal community structure between the two areas. In addition, the macrofaunal communities in the fished area displayed evidence of a higher level of stress compared with the other one. Several taxa reported in the literature as being sensitive to trawling (e.g., Ebalia tuberosa, Callianassa subterranea) were markedly more abundant in the area not affected by fishing. Macrofaunal community analysis using the index of multivariate dispersion and k-dominance curves provided evidence of stress in the fished area; however, it is not possible to predict whether the patterns observed will remain consistent over time based on only two temporal replicates. It is likely that the magnitude of the macrofaunal community response to fishing changes during the year according to season and fishing effort. Key words: bottom trawling, ecosystem disturbance, middle Adriatic Sea, sediment distribution, zoobenthos.
    [Show full text]
  • 132825345.Pdf
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Thessaly Institutional Repository ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΙΑΣ ΣΧΟΛΗ ΓΕΩΠΟΝΙΚΩΝ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΩΝ ΤΜΗΜΑ ΓΕΩΠΟΝΙΑΣ, ΙΧΘΥΟΛΟΓΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΥΔΑΤΙΝΟΥ ΠΕΡΙΒΑΛΛΟΝΤΟΣ ΠΤΥΧΙΑΚΗ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑ ΠΛΗΘΥΣΜΙΑΚΗ ΚΑΤΑΝΟΜΗ ΤΩΝ ΚΑΒΟΥΡΙΩΝ LIOCARCINUS DEPURATOR ΚΑΙ GONEPLAX RHOMBOIDES ΣΤΟΝ ΠΑΓΑΣΗΤΙΚΟ ΚΟΛΠΟ. Σαββάκης Εμμανουήλ Βόλος 2013-2014 1 Institutional Repository - Library & Information Centre - University of Thessaly 09/12/2017 13:02:29 EET - 137.108.70.7 ΠΕΡΙΕΧΟΜΕΝΑ 1. ΕΙΣΑΓΩΓΗ 1.1. Αντικείμενο και στόχοι της έρευνας ………………………………….....…4 1.2. Αρθρόποδα, δεκάποδα και καβούρια…………………………………....…5 1.3. Παγασητικός Κόλπος ……………………………………………………….11 1.4. Είδος goneplax rhomboides …………………………………………….....12 1.4.1. Γεωγραφική κατανομή……………………………………………….13 1.4.2. Μορφολογία………………………………………………………….13 1.5. Είδος liocarcinus depurator ……………………………………………….15 1.5.1. Διατροφή……………………………………………………………..16 1.5.2. Χωρική κατανομή και προτίμηση ενδιαιτήματος του είδους……….17 1.5.3. Αναπαραγωγή………………………………………………………...18 2. ΥΛΙΚΑ ΚΑΙ ΜΕΘΟΔΟΙ ………………………………………………………..19 2.1. Δειγματοληψίες……………………………………………………………...19 2.2. Μορφομετρικές μετρήσεις ………………………………………………….20 3. ΑΠΟΤΕΛΕΣΜΑΤΑ……………………………………………………………...23 3.1. Αλλομετρικές σχέσεις Liocarcinus depurator……………………………....23 3.2. Αλλομετρικές σχέσεις Goneplax rhomboides……………………………….26 3.3. Κλάσεις μεγέθους Liocarcinus depurator…………………………………..30 3.4. Κλάσεις μεγέθους Goneplax rhomboides……………………………………31 3.5. Εκτίμηση ηλικιακών ομάδων………………………………………………..32
    [Show full text]
  • Determination of the Biologically Relevant Sampling Depth for Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessments
    EPA/600/R-15/176 ERASC-015F October 2015 DETERMINATION OF THE BIOLOGICALLY RELEVANT SAMPLING DEPTH FOR TERRESTRIAL AND AQUATIC ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENTS Ecological Risk Assessment Support Center National Center for Environmental Assessment Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, OH NOTICE This document has been subjected to the Agency’s peer and administrative review and has been approved for publication as an EPA document. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Cover art on left-hand side is an adaptation of illustrations in two Soil Quality Information Sheets published by the USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service in May 2001: 1) Rangeland Sheet 6, Rangeland Soil Quality—Organic Matter, and 2) Rangeland Sheet 8, Rangeland Soil Quality—Soil Biota. Cover art on right-hand side is an adaptation of an illustration from Life in the Chesapeake Bay, by Alice Jane Lippson and Robert L. Lippson, published by Johns Hopkins University Press, 2715 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218. Preferred Citation: U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2015. Determination of the Biologically Relevant Sampling Depth for Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecological Risk Assessments. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Ecological Risk Assessment Support Center, Cincinnati, OH. EPA/600/R-15/176. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CSG 15 Research and Development Final Project Report (Not to Be Used for LINK Projects)
    MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, FISHERIES AND FOOD CSG 15 Research and Development Final Project Report (Not to be used for LINK projects) Two hard copies of this form should be returned to: Research Policy and International Division, Final Reports Unit MAFF, Area 6/01 1A Page Street, London SW1P 4PQ An electronic version should be e-mailed to [email protected] Project title Archiving and analysis of the MBA bottom trawl and benthic survey data: Unravelling fishing efforts from climate change MAFF project code MF0727 Contractor organisation Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, The Laboratory, and location Citadel Hill, Plymouth. PL1 2PB. Total MAFF project costs £ 64,600 Project start date 01/11/00 Project end date 31/03/01 Executive summary (maximum 2 sides A4) Marine ecosystems can alter dramatically over our lifetimes through natural processes or human activities such as fishing, pollution, recreation and coastal development. At present, the factors driving long-term change are poorly understood. A major area of concern is the impact of climatic fluctuations. Over the last twenty years, sea surface temperatures in the English Channel have risen by on average 1ºC, and a global rise in SST of over 1ºC is predicted over the next fifty years. There is convincing evidence that such climatic change can significantly affect populations and distributions of marine species, but to date there is little evidence for changes in demersal fish and invertebrate assemblages within European waters. These communities, important from both economic and ecological perspectives, are however known to be heavily impacted by fishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods Collecting Axiidea and Gebiidea (Decapoda): a Review 5-21 Ann
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien Jahr/Year: 2015 Band/Volume: 117B Autor(en)/Author(s): Dworschak Peter C. Artikel/Article: Methods collecting Axiidea and Gebiidea (Decapoda): a review 5-21 Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, B 117 5–21 Wien, Jänner 2015 Methods collecting Axiidea and Gebiidea (Decapoda): a review P.C. Dworschak* Abstract Axiidea and Gebiidae (formerly treated together as Thalassinidea) have a crypic lifestyle. Collecting these shrimp therefore requires special field methods. The present paper reviews these methods according to habitats and provides recommendations as well as data on their efficiency. In addition, information on the preservation of these animals is presented. Key words: Thalassinidea, Axiidea, Gebiidea, method, collecting, preservation Zusammenfassung Maulwurfskrebse aus den zwei Unterordungen der zehnfüßigen Krebes Axiidea und Gebiidea (früher zusammengefaßt als Thalassinidea) kommen in temperaten, subtropischen und tropischen Meeren vor und zeichnen sich durch ein Leben im Verborgenen aus. Viele Arten legen tiefe und ausgedehnte Bauten an. Diese Lebensweise erfordert eigene Methoden, um die Krebse zu fangen. Die verschiedenen Fangmethoden werden hier vorgestellt und Angaben zur Effizienz gemacht. Zusätzlich werden Angaben zur Fixierung und Konservierung der Krebse präsentiert. Introduction Formerly treated together as the thalassinideans, the infraorders Gebiidea DE SAINT LAURENT, 1979 and Axiidea DE SAINT LAURENT, 1979 represent two distinctly separate groups of decapods (ROBLES et al. 2009; BRACKEN et al. 2009; DWORSCHAK et al. 2012, POORE et al., 2014). They are commonly called mud shrimp or ghost shrimp, although they are only distantly related to true (dendrobranchiate or caridean) shrimp.
    [Show full text]