DOCSLIB.ORG

The Mediterranean Decapod and Stomatopod Crustacea in A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Mediterranean Decapod and Stomatopod Crustacea in A ANNALES DU MUSEUM D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE DE NICE Tome V, 1977, pp. 37-88. THE MEDITERRANEAN DECAPOD AND STOMATOPOD CRUSTACEA IN A. RISSO'S PUBLISHED WORKS AND MANUSCRIPTS by L. B. HOLTHUIS Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, Netherlands CONTENTS Risso's 1841 and 1844 guides, which contain a simple unannotated list of Crustacea found near Nice. 1. Introduction 37 Most of Risso's descriptions are quite satisfactory 2. The importance and quality of Risso's carcino- and several species were figured by him. This caused logical work 38 that most of his names were immediately accepted by 3. List of Decapod and Stomatopod species in Risso's his contemporaries and a great number of them is dealt publications and manuscripts 40 with in handbooks like H. Milne Edwards (1834-1840) Penaeidea 40 "Histoire naturelle des Crustaces", and Heller's (1863) Stenopodidea 46 "Die Crustaceen des siidlichen Europa". This made that Caridea 46 Risso's names at present are widely accepted, and that Macrura Reptantia 55 his works are fundamental for a study of Mediterranean Anomura 58 Brachyura 62 Decapods. Stomatopoda 76 Although most of Risso's descriptions are readily 4. New genera proposed by Risso (published and recognizable, there is a number that have caused later unpublished) 76 authors much difficulty. In these cases the descriptions 5. List of Risso's manuscripts dealing with Decapod were not sufficiently complete or partly erroneous, and Stomatopod Crustacea 77 the names given by Risso were either interpreted in 6. Literature 7S different ways and so caused confusion, or were entirely ignored. It is a very fortunate circumstance that many of 1. — INTRODUCTION Risso's manuscripts and notes, at least a great part of them, are still preserved and are held by the library The Crustacea of the Mediterranean are among the of the Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle in Paris. first ever that have been scientifically studied. Aristotle's It was Monod (1931) who first directed the attention to researches on the Decapoda of the eastern Mediterra­ these manuscripts. Thanks to the help of Dr Th. Monod nean for a long time (until far into the Middle Ages) and the late Dr M. Andre, both of the Paris Museum, formed the basis of the knowledge of that group. The I was able to obtain photocopies of all of the pages first printed works dealing with Crustacea (Belon, 1553, of these manuscripts dealing with Crustacea. Many 1555; Rondelet, 1554; Aldrovandus, 1606, etc.) mainly illustrations are present, among them several showing dealt with Mediterranean species. But it was not until species that had been insufficiently described by Risso. A. Risso in 1816 published his "Histoire Naturelle des In several instances they enabled the identification of Crustaces des environs de Nice" that the knowledge the dubious species. of the Mediterranean Crustacea obtained a firm basis. In the present paper I have listed all species of After the publication of Linnaeus's Systema Naturae and before 1816, it is true, several publications appeared in Decapod and Stomatopod Crustacea dealt with by Risso which Mediterranean Crustacea were dealt with (Briin- in his various publications and in his manuscripts. These nich, 1768; Olivi, 1792; Tilesius, 1796; Rafinesque, species are placed in the order adopted by most modern 1814, etc.), but these works as a rule also covered other carcinologists and the names used for them are the groups and the Crustacea are usually treated rather nomenclaturally valid ones. Under each species refe­ superficially or haphazardly. rences are given to [1] the places where Risso treated these species in his publications, with the names that he In two large and two small publications, Risso (1816, used there for them, and [2] the manuscripts in which 1822, 1827, 1827a) gave a thorough account of the the species are mentioned, with the indication of whether western Mediterranean Crustacea and described a wealth their names are just listed, a description is given, or a of new taxa. To these four publications may be added figure is provided; the manuscripts are here indicated 38 by the lettering given to them in the list in par. 5. Where whatever as to the species meant by these authors, but the species were mentioned by Hope (1851), or by also because they had a rather wide distribution. Unfor­ Monod (1931), references to those papers are included, tunately, neither the Costa's nor Roux finished their as are also references to papers listing or dealing with publications and only a part of the Decapoda that they Risso's nomina nuda, nomina dubia, or unpublished intended to treat were published. names. The first author to list unpublished manuscript It is Risso's great merit that in both his 1816 and names by Risso is Hope (1851), who inserted them in 1827 publications he covered the entire group of Deca­ his list of Mediterranean Crustacea, without, however, poda known from the Nice area and in doing so he giving any details of the species; the names therefore provided a handbook for the zoologists working in the remain nomina nuda and are unavailable; their identity western Mediterranean. Also his contacts with zoologists is only interesting for historical purposes. Monod (1931) like P. Roux and W.E. Leach, as well as with the carci- extensively dealt with Risso's manuscripts, giving a nologists of the Museum d'Histoire naturelle in Paris, complete inventory of them. In Monod's paper also several of Risso's manuscript names are published for made that more attention was paid to his writings than the first time, or some of the names listed by Hope to those by several other, perhaps more competent, carci- were again mentioned. More important, Monod repro­ nologists of the time. duced several of Risso's unpublished Crustacea illustra­ All this does not mean that his contemporaries were tions in his paper. not critical of Risso's work and that all regarded it to be of a very high standard. On the contrary, so Bour- Apart from the species dealt with by Risso, the new guignat (1861:6) characterized Risso as follows: « Ecri- genera of Decapoda proposed by that author are likewise vain fecond, mais sans jugement, innovateur infatigable, treated here (par. 4). mais absurde, Risso a embrasse dans ses ecrits presque The treatment of the various species in the present toutes les branches de l'histoire naturelle, sans en avoir paper is rather heterogeneous as much more attention bien traite une seule». Latreille (1819, Nouv. Diet. is given to the little known species and those that so far Hist. Nat., ed. 2 vol. 30, pp. 69, 70), less extreme, re­ were considered dubious, than to those that have always marked: « M. Risso..., dans son ouvrage sur les crus­ been correctly identified by subsequent authors. taces de la riviere de Nice, a decrit un assez grand I wish to express my deep gratitude to Dr. Th. nombre d'especes inedites de salicoques. Mais en ren- Monod, who, already a long time ago, awakened my dant justice a son zele et a ses travaux, nous ne pouvons nous empecher de dire qu'il n'a pas assez approfondi interest in Risso and the identity of the Crustacea son sujet; que sou- [p. 70 :] vent l'on cherche en vain, described by him. Dr. Monod generously placed all his dans ses descriptions, des connoissances relatives aux notes on Risso's Crustacea at my disposal, brought some principaux organes sur lesquels repose la classification; overlooked publications (e.g. Risso, 1844) to my atten­ que plusieurs de ces especes sont mal placees, et que tion, and greatly assisted me in the present study. The leur determination, a raison de ces lacunes, embarrassera late Dr. Marc Andre was kind enough to help me in souvent les naturalistes. La science est si avancee et em­ obtaining the microfilm of the greater part of Risso's brasse aujourd'hui tant de details, que des descriptions manuscripts. incompletes ne font qu'accroitre ce chaos designe sous le nom d'hwertae sedis. » The archives of the Rijksmu- seum van Natuurlijke Historie at Leiden contain letters 2. — THE IMPORTANCE AND QUALITY of the well known Belgian malacologist F.J. Cantraine, who from 1827 to 1833 collected for the Leiden Mu­ OF RISSO's CARCINOLOGICAL WORK seum in Italy and the nearby Mediterranean area. In a letter of 30 September 1827 Cantraine wrote that Risso's new book (i.e. Histoire naturelle de l'Europe meridio- In Risso's time, the first half of the 19th century, nale) was recently published and that it was « beaucoup several authors devoted their attention to the fauna of plus complet et aussi inexact dit-on» than his 1816 the western Mediterranean area. Most of these, like Crustaces des environs de Nice. Also A.G. Desmarest Risso, were amateurs and worked in southern France and H. Milne Edwards were quite critical of several of (e.g., A. Risso and J.B. Verany in Nice, Polydore Roux Risso's species and treated these as synonyms, species in Marseilles) and southern Italy (e.g., A. and O.G. inquirenda or entirely ignored them. Desmarest (1825: Costa in Naples, C.S. Rafinesque, A. Cocco, G. de 421-425), for instance, in a separate appendix to his Natale, N. Prestandrea and A. Rizza in Sicily). Of all well known « Considerations... » listed those species of these authors, Risso was the most influential, even Crustacea described by Risso (among which 17 species though not the most accomplished. Some of his descrip­ of Decapoda), which he (Desmarest) could not defini­ tions are incomplete, lack mention of important details, tely assign to their correct genera: he had « des doutes or are inaccurate in places, while not all new species are sur l'exactitude de la determination des genres auxquels figured; hereby a, be it relatively small, number of his ont ete rapportes la plupart d'entr'elles ».
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Taxonomic Study of the Pagurus Forbesii "Complex" (Crustacea
    Taxonomic study of the Pagurus forbesii "complex" (Crustacea: Decapoda: Paguridae). Description of Pagurus pseudosculptimanus sp. nov. from Alborán Sea (Southern Spain, Western Mediterranean Sea). GARCÍA MUÑOZ J.E.1, CUESTA J.A.2 & GARCÍA RASO J.E.1* 1 Dept. Biología Animal, Fac. Ciencias, Univ. Málaga, Campus de Teatinos s/n, 29071 Málaga, Spain. 2 Inst. Ciencias Marinas de Andalucía (CSIC), Av. República Saharaui, 2, 11519 Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain. * Corresponding author - e-mail address: [email protected] ABSTRACT The study of hermit crabs from Alboran Sea has allowed recognition of two different morphological forms under what had been understood as Pagurus forbesii. Based on morphological observations with various species of Pagurus, and molecular studies, a new species is defined and described as P. pseudosculptimanus. An overview on species of Pagurus from the eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean Sea is provided. Key words: Pagurus, new species, Mediterranean, eastern Atlantic. 1 Introduction More than 170 species from around the world are currently assigned to the genus Pagurus Fabricius, 1775 (Lemaitre and Cruz Castaño 2004; Mantelatto et al. 2009; McLaughlin 2003, McLaughlin et al. 2010). This genus is complex because of there is high morphological variability and similarity among some species, and has been divided in groups (e.g. Lemaitre and Cruz Castaño 2004 for eastern Pacific species; Ingle, 1985, for European species) with difficulty (Ayón-Parente and Hendrickx 2012). This difficulty has lead to taxonomic problems, although molecular techniques have been recently used to elucidate some species (Mantelatto et al. 2009; Da Silva et al. 2011). Thirteen species are present in eastern Atlantic (European and the adjacent African waters) (Ingle 1993; Udekem d'Acoz 1999; Froglia, 2010, MarBEL Data System - Türkay 2012, García Raso et al., in press) but only nine of these (the first ones mentioned below) have been cited in the Mediterranean Sea, all of them are present in the study area (Alboran Sea, southern Spain).
    [Show full text]
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt
    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTRE FOR SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt PROF. MOUSTAFA M. FOUDA April 2017 1 Study required and financed by: Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat BP 337 1080 Tunis Cedex – Tunisie Responsible of the study: Mehdi Aissi, EcApMEDII Programme officer In charge of the study: Prof. Moustafa M. Fouda Mr. Mohamed Said Abdelwarith Mr. Mahmoud Fawzy Kamel Ministry of Environment, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) With the participation of: Name, qualification and original institution of all the participants in the study (field mission or participation of national institutions) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 4 Preamble 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 40 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 49 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 59 Chapter 5: Existing Monitoring Program in Egypt 91 1. Monitoring program for habitat mapping 103 2. Marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 3. Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 4. Monitoring Program for Seabirds 118 5. Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 123 Chapter 6: Implementation / Operational Plan 131 Selected References 133 Annexes 143 3 AKNOWLEGEMENTS We would like to thank RAC/ SPA and EU for providing financial and technical assistances to prepare this monitoring programme. The preparation of this programme was the result of several contacts and interviews with many stakeholders from Government, research institutions, NGOs and fishermen. The author would like to express thanks to all for their support. In addition; we would like to acknowledge all participants who attended the workshop and represented the following institutions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Lobsters-Identification, World Distribution, and U.S. Trade
    Lobsters-Identification, World Distribution, and U.S. Trade AUSTIN B. WILLIAMS Introduction tons to pounds to conform with US. tinents and islands, shoal platforms, and fishery statistics). This total includes certain seamounts (Fig. 1 and 2). More­ Lobsters are valued throughout the clawed lobsters, spiny and flat lobsters, over, the world distribution of these world as prime seafood items wherever and squat lobsters or langostinos (Tables animals can also be divided rougWy into they are caught, sold, or consumed. 1 and 2). temperate, subtropical, and tropical Basically, three kinds are marketed for Fisheries for these animals are de­ temperature zones. From such partition­ food, the clawed lobsters (superfamily cidedly concentrated in certain areas of ing, the following facts regarding lob­ Nephropoidea), the squat lobsters the world because of species distribu­ ster fisheries emerge. (family Galatheidae), and the spiny or tion, and this can be recognized by Clawed lobster fisheries (superfamily nonclawed lobsters (superfamily noting regional and species catches. The Nephropoidea) are concentrated in the Palinuroidea) . Food and Agriculture Organization of temperate North Atlantic region, al­ The US. market in clawed lobsters is the United Nations (FAO) has divided though there is minor fishing for them dominated by whole living American the world into 27 major fishing areas for in cooler waters at the edge of the con­ lobsters, Homarus americanus, caught the purpose of reporting fishery statis­ tinental platform in the Gul f of Mexico, off the northeastern United States and tics. Nineteen of these are marine fish­ Caribbean Sea (Roe, 1966), western southeastern Canada, but certain ing areas, but lobster distribution is South Atlantic along the coast of Brazil, smaller species of clawed lobsters from restricted to only 14 of them, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Spermatophore Morphology of the Endemic Hermit Crab Loxopagurus Loxochelis (Anomura, Diogenidae) from the Southwestern Atlantic - Brazil and Argentina
    Invertebrate Reproduction and Development, 46:1 (2004) 1- 9 Balaban, Philadelphia/Rehovot 0168-8170/04/$05 .00 © 2004 Balaban Spermatophore morphology of the endemic hermit crab Loxopagurus loxochelis (Anomura, Diogenidae) from the southwestern Atlantic - Brazil and Argentina MARCELO A. SCELZ01*, FERNANDO L. MANTELATT02 and CHRISTOPHER C. TUDGE3 1Departamento de Ciencias Marinas, FCEyN, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata/CONICET, Funes 3350, (B7600AYL), Mar del Plata, Argentina Tel. +54 (223) 475-1107; Fax: +54 (223) 475-3150; email: [email protected] 2Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosojia, Ciencias e Letras de Ribeirao Preto (FFCLRP), Universidade de Sao Paulo (USP), Av. Bandeirantes 3900, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brasil 3Department of Systematic Biology, National Museum ofNatural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA Received 10 June 2003; Accepted 29 August 2003 Summary The spermatophore morphology of the endemic and monotypic hermit crab Loxopagurus loxochelis from the southwestern Atlantic is described. The spermatophores show similarities with those described for other members of the family Diogenidae (especially the genus Cliba­ narius), and are composed of three major regions: a sperm-filled, circular flat ampulla; a columnar stalk; and a pedestal. The morphology and size of the spermatophore of L. loxochelis, along with a distinguishable constriction or neck that penetrates almost halfway into the base of the ampulla, are characteristic of this species. The size of the spermatophore is related to hermit crab size. Direct relationships were found between the spermatophore ampulla width, total length, and peduncle length with carapace length of the hermit crab. These morphological characteristics and size of the spermatophore ofL.
    [Show full text]
  • Alien Shrimps in Evidence: New Records of the Genus Athanas Leach, 1814 on the Coast of Sa˜O Paulo, Southern Brazil (Caridea: Alpheidae)
    Helgol Mar Res (2012) 66:557–565 DOI 10.1007/s10152-012-0291-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Alien shrimps in evidence: new records of the genus Athanas Leach, 1814 on the coast of Sa˜o Paulo, southern Brazil (Caridea: Alpheidae) Alexandre O. Almeida • Sabrina M. Simo˜es • Roge´rio C. Costa • Fernando L. Mantelatto Received: 4 September 2011 / Revised: 22 November 2011 / Accepted: 7 January 2012 / Published online: 18 January 2012 Ó Springer-Verlag and AWI 2012 Abstract The occurrence of two alien alpheid shrimps of of this species in the western Atlantic farther to the south in the genus Athanas Leach, 1814 [in Leach 1813–1814], the Brazil, whereas A. nitescens is reported for the first time in Indo-West Pacific A. dimorphus Ortmann, 1894 and the the western Atlantic, representing the second alien alpheid Eastern Atlantic A. nitescens (Leach, 1813 [in Leach 1813– species on this side of the Atlantic and the twenty-first 1814]), on the coast of the state of Sa˜o Paulo, Brazil, is decapod crustacean introduced in Brazil. We provide reported. The presence of A. dimorphus extends the range morphological accounts of the material examined and illustrate the most important diagnostic characters of both species. An overview of the possible mechanisms of their Communicated by Heinz-Dieter Franke. introduction on the coast of Sa˜o Paulo is also provided. & A. O. Almeida ( ) Keywords Crustacea Á Decapoda Á Athanas Á Departamento de Cieˆncias Biolo´gicas, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Exotic species Á Western Atlantic Rodovia Ilhe´us-Itabuna, km 16, Ilhe´us, BA 45662-900, Brazil e-mail: [email protected] Introduction S.
    [Show full text]
  • D13 the Marine Environment Development Consent Order
    ENERGY WORKING FOR BRITAIN FOR WORKING ENERGY Wylfa Newydd Project 6.4.13 ES Volume D - WNDA Development D13 - The marine environment PINS Reference Number: EN010007 Application Reference Number: 6.4.13 June 2018 Revision 1.0 Regulation Number: 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Horizon Internal DCRM Number: WN0902-JAC-PAC-CHT-00045 [This page is intentionally blank] Contents 13 The marine environment .................................................................................. 1 13.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1 13.2 Study area ....................................................................................................... 1 13.3 Wylfa Newydd Development Area baseline environment ................................ 2 Conservation designations .............................................................................. 3 Water quality .................................................................................................... 9 Sediment quality ............................................................................................ 13 Phytoplankton and zooplankton ..................................................................... 15 Marine benthic habitats and species .............................................................. 18 Marine fish ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of a New Genus for Arete Borradailei
    Zoological Studies 46(4): 454-472 (2007) Establishment of a New Genus for Arete borradailei Coutière, 1903 and Athanas verrucosus Banner and Banner, 1960, with Redefinitions of Arete Stimpson, 1860 and Athanas Leach, 1814 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Alpheidae) Arthur Anker1,* and Ming-Shiou Jeng2 1Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Naos Unit 0948, APO AA 34002-0948, USA. E-mail:[email protected] 2Research Center for Biodiversity, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan. E-mail:[email protected] (Accepted October 5, 2006) Arthur Anker and Ming-Shiou Jeng (2007) Establishment of a new genus for Arete borradailei Coutière, 1903 and Athanas verrucosus Banner and Banner, 1960, with redefinitions of Arete Stimpson, 1860 and Athanas Leach, 1814 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Alpheidae). Zoological Studies 46(4): 454-472. Arete borradailei Coutière, 1903 and Athanas verrucosus Banner and Banner, 1960 are transferred to Rugathanas gen. nov., based on several unique features on the chelipeds, 3rd pereiopods, antennules, and mouthparts. The estab- lishment of Rugathanas enables the redefinition of Athanas Leach, 1814 and Arete Stimpson, 1860, and a for- mal revalidation of Arete, formerly a synonym of Athanas. Two important features, the number of pereiopodal epipods and the number of carpal segments of the 2nd pereiopod, are variable within Rugathanas gen. nov., but may be used to distinguish Athanas from Arete. The distribution ranges of R. borradailei (Coutière, 1903) comb. nov. and R. verrucosus (Banner and Banner, 1960) comb. nov. are considerably extended based on recently collected material from the Ryukyu Is., Japan; Kenting, southern Taiwan; and Norfolk I., off eastern Australia. http://zoolstud.sinica.edu.tw/Journals/46.4/454.pdf Key words: Alpheidae, New genus, Athanas, Arete, Indo-Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Skates and Rays Diversity, Exploration and Conservation – Case-Study of the Thornback Ray, Raja Clavata
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL SKATES AND RAYS DIVERSITY, EXPLORATION AND CONSERVATION – CASE-STUDY OF THE THORNBACK RAY, RAJA CLAVATA Bárbara Marques Serra Pereira Doutoramento em Ciências do Mar 2010 UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL SKATES AND RAYS DIVERSITY, EXPLORATION AND CONSERVATION – CASE-STUDY OF THE THORNBACK RAY, RAJA CLAVATA Bárbara Marques Serra Pereira Tese orientada por Professor Auxiliar com Agregação Leonel Serrano Gordo e Investigadora Auxiliar Ivone Figueiredo Doutoramento em Ciências do Mar 2010 The research reported in this thesis was carried out at the Instituto de Investigação das Pescas e do Mar (IPIMAR - INRB), Unidade de Recursos Marinhos e Sustentabilidade. This research was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through a PhD grant (SFRH/BD/23777/2005) and the research project EU Data Collection/DCR (PNAB). Skates and rays diversity, exploration and conservation | Table of Contents Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. v List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. viii Agradecimentos ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Feeding Habits of the Galatheidea. by Edith A
    [ 87 ] The Feeding Habits of the Galatheidea. By Edith A. T. Nicol, B A., Ph.D., Department of Zoology. University of Edinburgh. With 7 Figures in the Text. CONTENTS. PAOR INTRODUCTION .... 87 Previous Work 88 Bionomics .... 88 STRUCTURE OF THE MOUTH-PARTS . 89 Galafhea dispersa 89 Porcellana lonyicornis 92 FEEDING HABITS .... 94 Galathea dispersa 94 Deposit feeding . 94 Feeding on large pieces of food 96 Porcellana longicornits 97 The Feeding Mechanism 97 CLEANING MOVEMENTS . 102 DISCUSSION ..... 103 SUMMARY ..... 105 LITERATURE ..... 106 INTRODUCTION. ALTHOUGH the Galatheidea are conspicuous members of the Anomura and occur commonly both on the shore and in deeper water, no account has yet been given of the different methods of feeding which are found within the group. While working at the Marine Biological Laboratory at Plymouth some time ago I became interested, as previous workers have been, in the curiously modified third maxillipeds of Porcellana longicornis, and decided to examine the mode of feeding in this and related forms. My best thanks are due to Dr. E. J. Allen, F.R.S., of the Marine -Biological Association, and to Professor J. H. Orton, of Liverpool University, for every help and encouragement, and also to Professor J- H. Ash worth, F.R.S., of Edinburgh University, for valuable criticism °f the manuscript. 88 EDITH A. T. NICOL. PREVIOUS WORK. Dalyell (1853) describes Porcellana longicornis as the " fanning or ventilating crab," and mentions the alternating see-sawing action of the third maxillipeds fringed with long hairs ; he associates the movements however with respiration. Gosse (1854) points out the use of the maxilli­ peds in feeding, comparing them with the legs of a barnacle.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep-Water Decapod Crustacea from Eastern Australia: Lobsters of the Families Nephropidae, Palinuridae, Polychelidae and Scyllaridae
    Records of the Australian Museum (1995) Vo!. 47: 231-263. ISSN 0067-1975 Deep-water Decapod Crustacea from Eastern Australia: Lobsters of the Families Nephropidae, Palinuridae, Polychelidae and Scyllaridae D.J.G. GRIFFIN & H.E. STODDART Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia ABSTRACT. Twenty-three species of deep-water lobsters in the families Nephropidae, Palinuridae, Polychelidae and Scyllaridae are recorded from the continental shelf and slope off eastern Australia. Ten species and two genera have not been previously recorded from Australia. These are Acanthacaris tenuimana, Projasus parkeri, Polycheles baccatus, P. euthrix, P. granulatus, Stereomastis andamanensis, S. helleri, S. sculpta, S. suhmi and Willemoesia bonaspei. The deep­ water lobster fauna of eastern Australia is compared with those of other Indo-Pacific areas. A key is given to all deep-water lobster species recorded from Australian waters. GRIFFIN, D.J.O. & H.E. STODDART, 1995. Deep-water decapod Crustacea from eastern Australia: lobsters of the families Nephropidae, Palinuridae, Polychelidae and Scyllaridae. Records of the Australian Museum 47(3): 231-263. The deep-water lobster fauna of the Australian region fauna of southern Australia is as yet poorly known but first became known from collections made by the British extensive collections have been made by the Museum Challenger Expedition (Bate, 1888), the 1911-14 of Victoria on the continental shelf and slope of south­ Australasian Antarctic Expedition (Bage, 1938), the eastern Australia and Bass Strait. Commonwealth of Australia fishing experiments on the This paper is the third of a series dealing with deep­ Endeavour (1909-1914); various local trawling excursions water decapods taken by the New South Wales Fisheries (e.g., Grant, 1905) and serendipitous catches by Research Vessel Kapala, which has carried out trawling professional fishermen (e.g., McNeill, 1949, 1956).
    [Show full text]
  • From Ghost and Mud Shrimp
    Zootaxa 4365 (3): 251–301 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4365.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C5AC71E8-2F60-448E-B50D-22B61AC11E6A Parasites (Isopoda: Epicaridea and Nematoda) from ghost and mud shrimp (Decapoda: Axiidea and Gebiidea) with descriptions of a new genus and a new species of bopyrid isopod and clarification of Pseudione Kossmann, 1881 CHRISTOPHER B. BOYKO1,4, JASON D. WILLIAMS2 & JEFFREY D. SHIELDS3 1Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West @ 79th St., New York, New York 10024, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York 11549, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Aquatic Health Sciences, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, P.O. Box 1346, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 4Corresponding author Table of contents Abstract . 252 Introduction . 252 Methods and materials . 253 Taxonomy . 253 Isopoda Latreille, 1817 . 253 Bopyroidea Rafinesque, 1815 . 253 Ionidae H. Milne Edwards, 1840. 253 Ione Latreille, 1818 . 253 Ione cornuta Bate, 1864 . 254 Ione thompsoni Richardson, 1904. 255 Ione thoracica (Montagu, 1808) . 256 Bopyridae Rafinesque, 1815 . 260 Pseudioninae Codreanu, 1967 . 260 Acrobelione Bourdon, 1981. 260 Acrobelione halimedae n. sp. 260 Key to females of species of Acrobelione Bourdon, 1981 . 262 Gyge Cornalia & Panceri, 1861. 262 Gyge branchialis Cornalia & Panceri, 1861 . 262 Gyge ovalis (Shiino, 1939) . 264 Ionella Bonnier, 1900 .
    [Show full text]
  • Part I. an Annotated Checklist of Extant Brachyuran Crabs of the World
    THE RAFFLES BULLETIN OF ZOOLOGY 2008 17: 1–286 Date of Publication: 31 Jan.2008 © National University of Singapore SYSTEMA BRACHYURORUM: PART I. AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF EXTANT BRACHYURAN CRABS OF THE WORLD Peter K. L. Ng Raffles Museum of Biodiversity Research, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Kent Ridge, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore Email: [email protected] Danièle Guinot Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Département Milieux et peuplements aquatiques, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France Email: [email protected] Peter J. F. Davie Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT. – An annotated checklist of the extant brachyuran crabs of the world is presented for the first time. Over 10,500 names are treated including 6,793 valid species and subspecies (with 1,907 primary synonyms), 1,271 genera and subgenera (with 393 primary synonyms), 93 families and 38 superfamilies. Nomenclatural and taxonomic problems are reviewed in detail, and many resolved. Detailed notes and references are provided where necessary. The constitution of a large number of families and superfamilies is discussed in detail, with the positions of some taxa rearranged in an attempt to form a stable base for future taxonomic studies. This is the first time the nomenclature of any large group of decapod crustaceans has been examined in such detail. KEY WORDS. – Annotated checklist, crabs of the world, Brachyura, systematics, nomenclature. CONTENTS Preamble .................................................................................. 3 Family Cymonomidae .......................................... 32 Caveats and acknowledgements ............................................... 5 Family Phyllotymolinidae .................................... 32 Introduction .............................................................................. 6 Superfamily DROMIOIDEA ..................................... 33 The higher classification of the Brachyura ........................
    [Show full text]