Youth Centre Guide-Spreads
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Consat Telematics AB
Consat Canada Inc. Introduction . Consat . Roger Sauve . Filip Stekovic . Timmins Transit . Jamie Millions . Fred Gerrior Consat Canada Customers Timmins Transit Sudbury Transit Milton Transit Thunder Bay Transit Kawartha Lakes North Bay Transit Timiskaming Shores STM Orillia Transit NYC Kingston Transit Sudbury Municipal solutions Sarnia Transit Orangeville Transit Simcoe Transit Three more to be added in 2019 Mandatory System – AODA | Additional Features . Mandatory system – AODA compliant . Automatic Next Stop Announcement (ANSA) . Calling out stop both audibly and visually . Internally for customers on board and externally for customers at stops and platforms . Additional Features . AVL tracking of vehicles . On time performance . Ridership counts . Real time customer information . Applications for all users . Expandable solution AODA | Automatic Next Stop Announcement (ANSA) . Visual ANSA using internal display . Recorded and/or synthetic announcement voice. Reliable, configurable triggering of announcement (distance/time to stop point). AODA | Automatic Next Stop Announcement (ANSA) . External announcement of vehicle destination when arriving at stop point. Scheduled audio volume setting – minimizes noise pollution at night. Quiet stop points/areas Real time schedule monitoring . Multiple tools to follow vehicles in real-time . Event-based system with continuous updates Tools | Event Monitor & Event History Data Analysis . Specialised reports . Timetable adherence . Route analysis . Ridership analysis . System performance analysis . Vehicle communication . Vehicle speed . Troubleshooting Driver Assistant . Provides the driver real-time timetable adherence, trip information, passenger counts Automatic Passenger Counter Two Way Messaging . Communication between traffic controller and drivers . Controllers can send to single vehicles, groups and even whole routes. Controllers can use and easily create templates, with response options. Controllers have access to a message log. -
Committee Report
Committee Report To: Warden McQueen and Members of Grey County Council Council Date: July 23, 2020 Subject / Report No: CAOR-CW-10-20 Title: Revised Community Transportation Service Delivery and Budget Proposal Prepared by: Stephanie Stewart, Manager, Community Transportation Reviewed by: Kim Wingrove, CAO Lower Tier(s) Affected: Grey County wide Status: Recommendation adopted by Committee as presented per Resolution CW138-20; Endorsed by Council August 13, 2020; Recommendation 1. That report CAOR-CW-10-20 Revised Community Transportation Service Delivery and Budget Proposal be received, and; 2. That staff be directed to negotiate a single source agreement as per the purchasing policy, with Driverseat Inc. to provide services in fulfillment of the provincial Community Transportation grant and the additional Grey Road 4 route between Durham, Hanover and Walkerton, and; 3. That once completed to the satisfaction of the Chief Administrative Officer, the Warden and Clerk be authorized to execute the agreement with Driverseat Inc., and; 4. That the Warden and Clerk be authorized to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with The Corporation of the Township of Southgate, authorizing Grey County to deliver on Southgate’s behalf, a transit service as required by the Provincial Grant awarded to Southgate, and; 5. That the cost to operate the system from September 1 to December 31, 2020, of $213,911, after recoverable HST (excluding Grey Road 4) be funded as per the 2020 budget, and; 6. That should Council wish to proceed with the Grey Road 4 route, the cost to operate the route for the period of September 1 to December 31, 2020 is $30,606, after recoverable HST, to be funded from the One-Time Funding Reserve, with 2021 and 2022 to be included in the annual budget, and; CAOR-CW-10-20 July 23, 2020 7. -
Best Practices and Key Considerations For
BEST PRACTICES AND KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR TRANSIT ELECTRIFICATION AND CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE DEPLOYMENT TO DELIVER PREDICTABLE, RELIABLE, AND COST-EFFECTIVE FLEET SYSTEMS First Published JUNE 2020 Edition 2.0 SEPTEMBER 2020 AUTHORS Dr.Josipa Petrunic, President & CEO Dr. Elnaz Abotalebi, Researcher & Project Lead Dr. Abhishek Raj, Researcher c 2 COPYRIGHT © 2020 Information in this document is to be considered the intellectual property of the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium in accordance with Canadian copyright law. This report was prepared by the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium for the account of Natural Resources Canada. The material in it reflects the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium’s best judgment in light of the information available to it at the time of preparation. Any use that a third party makes of this report or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it are the responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. UPDATE: COVID-19 PUBLICATION IMPACT The publication of this report has been delayed by three months due to the COVID-19 global pandemic. This report, and the majority of research included within it, was completed primarily between September 2019 and March 2020 – prior to the novel coronavirus pandemic affecting local economies and transit revenue across Canada. While efforts have been made to include relevant announcements by Canadian transit agencies since that time, specifically as they relate to electric buses, many investment decisions and funding programs related to municipal green infrastructure deployments may change this year as a result of the financial crisis unfolding in cities across the country. -
Committee Report
Committee Report To: Warden McQueen and Members of Grey County Council Council Date: April 9, 2020 Subject / Report No: CAOR-CW-05-20 Title: Community Transportation Budget Presentation and Service Level Options Prepared by: Stephanie Stewart, Manager, Community Transportation Reviewed by: Kim Wingrove, CAO Lower Tier(s) Affected: Grey County wide Status: Recommendation 1. That report CAOR-CW-05-20 Community Transportation Budget and Service Level Presentation be received, and; 2. That County Council provide direction on the transportation schedule and required investment, and; 3. That staff finalize the First Student contract, and; 4. That County Council provide direction regarding implementation of service on Grey Road 4. Executive Summary Grey County staff have completed procurement for drivers and vehicles. This report compares costs of varying levels of service from the minimum required to meet the grant requirements to an optimal level to maximize service utility. Council direction on service investments beyond the minimum are required. April 9, 2020 Background and Discussion On May 23rd, 2019 Grey County was pleased to received funding from the Provincial Government to enhance transportation for all resident. Grey County in partnership with the Township of Southgate received approximately $2.3 million in funding. On July 2nd, 2019 staff began engaging stakeholders to gain a comprehensive understanding of the unique needs of the residents in Grey County. On August 23rd, 2019, Grey County released a Negotiated RFP seeking a transportation service provider to develop an innovative “Made in Grey” solution. Staff had numerous conversations with the top RFP respondent, however, staff concluded that it would not be in the best interest of Grey County to contract the entire service out to, due to cost and reduced control measures. -
Grey County Affordable Housing Task Force
SIGN UP FOR EMAIL NEWSLETTER www.bluemountainsreview.ca www.visitblue.ca AUGUST 2020 Vol 6 Issue 21 Published by Riverside Press, Box 340, Clarksburg, N0H 1J0 519-599-3345 AUGUST 7TH EDITION Attainable Housing Gateway and associated costs. program is for people who Those submissions work in The Blue Mountains will also be provided or have recently retired from to the community for active employment in The feedback. Blue Mountains. Attainable For more information, housing bridges the gap by contact: providing quality housing that Alar Soever, Mayor is affordable and available for rent or purchase to eligible families or 519-599-3131 ext. 400 individuals whose housing needs are not being met by the private Rob Sampson, market.Defining The goal Attainable is for more vs. families Affordable and individuals to live where Councillor Chair of The Blue Mountains Attainable Housing theyOutlined work below and isretirees the emerging can remain affordable in the housing community continuum in thatwhich they Corporation 519-599-3131 ext. 408 havemunicipalities worked. operate within. Based on BMAHC’s updated mandate and marketBased realities, on housing the most affordability optimal space in forThe BMAHC Blue isMountains, found within the market target isintervention to make attainablehousing availablehousing, with to themeet support the spacedemand occupied of moderate by the County’s supportive housing programs and Beaver Valley Outreach. This Return to School householdsegment will income ground BMAHC’sin the range operating of 50 definition to 130% of of attainable the local housing median incomeand its subsequent (approximately activities. $40,000 to $100,000). Plans - Tues., Sept 8 The Housing Corporation also has the Secondary Suite Grant Affordable/Attainable As directed by the Ministry of Education, Bluewater District School Program Supportand thethe Transition Down Payment Assistance Program. -
Escribe Agenda Package
Town of Shelburne Regular Council Meeting - Agenda January 11, 2021 6:30 pm Council Chambers 203 Main St. E, Shelburne This document can be made available in other accessible formats and with communication supports as soon as practicable and upon request. Information is collected under the authority of The Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act. The agenda is a public document and forms part of the permanent public record. Questions about the collection of personal information should be directed to the Clerk at 519-925-2600. Pages 1. Call to Order This meeting will be held electronically in accordance with Section 238(3.1) of the Municipal Act which provides that a member of Council, of a local board or of a committee of either of them, can participate electronically. In-person attendance at this meeting will not be permitted. Members of the public may observe the proceedings by accessing the live webcast on the Town of Shelburne YouTube page: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsar-MwF8CXrgPbe2EVxh-w Canadian National Anthem Land Acknowledgement: We would like to acknowledge the traditional territory of the Anishinaabe including the Ojibway, Potawatomi and Chippewa and the People of the Three Fires Confederacy. 2. Disclosure of Pecuniary Interest and General Nature Thereof 3. Adoption of Minutes 1. Minutes from the December 14, 2020 Committee of Adjustment 7 and Regular Council meeting. Recommendation: BE IT RESOLVED THAT the minutes from the Committee of Adjustment and Regular Council meeting held December 14, 2020 be approved as presented and circulated. 4. Public Participation 1. Public Question Period Questions relating to agenda business can be submitted to the Clerk at [email protected] or 519-925-2600 Ext. -
Annual Report 2016-17
Annual Report 2016-17 TRANSFORMING MOBILITY Entry from Imagine Eglinton Children’s Art Contest by Arianna, age 6 -Envisioning Eglinton Avenue once the Eglinton Crosstown LRT is complete II METROLINX ANNUAL REPORT 2016-2017 “ Metrolinx is about creating real connections for real people.” METROLINX ANNUAL REPORT 2016-2017 III MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR In 2016-2017, Metrolinx marked 10 years creating connections and transforming the way people move within and between communities in the Greater Toronto and J. ROBERT S. PRICHARD Hamilton Area (GTHA). In reflection, it’s always easy Transit Commission (TTC) stations Finally, I’d like express the deep to think in terms of projects and on all surface vehicles—a year respect and lasting gratitude of completed and milestones ahead of schedule. One card that the Board of Directors to Bruce achieved. But Metrolinx is about lets you travel throughout the McCuaig for his outstanding creating real connections for real region. That’s real convenience. leadership as Metrolinx President people. Our goal is to change & Chief Executive Officer the way residents of the GTHA This wouldn’t have been possible over more than six years. In interact with their region. without the efforts of our March, Bruce announced he exceptionally talented executive would be transitioning to a To that end, I’m proud to team and the dedicated front-line federal role in the Privy Council highlight events in the last year, staff who made it all happen— Office as Executive Advisor such as the completion of the people who live and work in the to support the launch of the Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail region, and understand the value Canada Infrastructure Bank. -
TOWARDS COORDINATED RURAL TRANSPORTATION: a Resource Guide AUGUST 2014 - I
TOWARDS COORDINATED RURAL TRANSPORTATION: A Resource Guide AUGUST 2014 - i ACCELERATING RURAL TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Lack of transportation is a significant issue in all rural and remote communities in Ontario which affects most of the determinants of health. This report is a product of the ACCELERATING RURAL TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS initiative; a collaboration between the Rural Ontario Institute and the Ontario Healthy Communities Coalition. The purpose of this initiative is to enhance and strengthen the sharing of knowledge of effective models and emerging innovation in rural regional transportation. This project received funding from The Ontario Trillium Foundation, an agency of the Ontario government. The members of the study team that contributed to this report include the following: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS Norman Ragetlie, Rural Ontario Institute Rob Black, Rural Ontario Institute Scott Currie, Rural Ontario Institute Lorna McCue, Ontario Healthy Communities Coalition Lisa Tolentino, Ontario Healthy Communities Coalition Brad Smith, Ride Norfolk Scott Butler, Ontario Good Roads Association CONSULTANT PROJECT TEAM Dennis Kar, RPP, MCIP, Dillon Consulting Limited Richard Puccini, P.Eng, Dillon Consulting Limited Stephanie Simard, RPP, MCIP, Dillon Consulting Limited Morgan Boyco, RPP, MCIP, Dillon Consulting Limited Special appreciation is extended to the lead organizations in the three study regions who contributed to the assessment and assisted with engaging local stakeholders, namely: Wellington County, Headwaters Communities -
Administration & Finance Committee
TOWN OF GRIMSBY Administration & Finance Committee Agenda Monday, July 11, 2016 4:30 p.m. Town Hall Escarpment Room 160 Livingston Avenue Page A. Call to Order B. Disclosure of Interest C. Reports 3 - 7 i) FIN 16-24 2015 Capital Statement of Operations 8 - 11 ii) FIN 16-25 2015 Development Charges Treasurer's Statement 12 - 22 iii) P.A. 16-26 Consultant Selection Transit Investigation Study D. Minutes 23 - 25 i) Transit Investigation Committee E. Correspondence 26 - 214 i) Memorandum from the Director of Planning - Transit Investigation Study, Request for Proposals Page 1 of 214 Administration & Finance Committee July 11, 2016 Agenda Page F. New Business G. Next Meeting i) The next Administration & Finance Committee meeting is scheduled for Monday, August 15, 2016 in the Town Hall Escarpment Room, 160 Livingston Avenue, Grimsby. H. Adjournment Page 2 of 214 Agenda Item i) 16-24 JULY 6, 2016 REPORT TO: ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: JULY 11, 2016 SUBJECT: 2015 CAPITAL STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS RECOMMENDATION That, report FIN 16-24 regarding the 2015 Capital Statement of Operations be received, And that, all budget variances be transferred from their respective reserves. BACKGROUND The Capital Statement of Operations is attached as Schedule A summary of the 2015 capital projects by department is listed in the attached schedule. The schedule shows the cost of each project, its associated budget and funding sources. There were only a few larger budget variances during the year. Highlights of the Capital Fund for 2015 are as follows: Corporate Overall, computer equipment was over budget slightly by about $7,000. -
An Analysis Into the Expansion of Inter-Regional Public Transportation Within British Columbia’S Lower Mainland
The Next Stop: An Analysis into the Expansion of Inter-regional Public Transportation Within British Columbia’s Lower Mainland by Daniel Lam B.Sc., University of British Columbia, 2019 Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Public Policy in the School of Public Policy Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences © Daniel Lam 2021 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Spring 2021 Copyright in this work is held by the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Declaration of Committee Name: Daniel Lam Degree: Master of Public Policy Title: The Next Stop: An Analysis into the Expansion of Inter-regional Public Transportation within British Columbia’s Lower Mainland Committee: Chair: John Richards Professor, School of Public Policy Dominique Gross Supervisor Professor, School of Public Policy Nancy Olewiler Examiner Professor and Director, School of Public Policy ii Ethics Statement iii Abstract Public transportation is crucial in helping to grow cities sustainably. Good public transportation allows for less car-dependence, healthier and less polluted communities, and more equitable communities. Within BC’s Lower Mainland, the current lack of inter- regional transit options, combined with the high level of congestion, pollution, and growing population in the Fraser Valley and Metro Vancouver’s eastern communities presents opportunities to explore different methods to better connect the Fraser Valley and Metro Vancouver with mass transit. The study looks at data from a jurisdictional scan and expert interviews to analyze several different inter-regional transit proposals that have been discussed within the Lower Mainland. -
Weekend Expansion Pilot Project Grey County Transit.Pdf
Meeting Date: Monday, January 11, 2021 To: Mayor Mills and Members of Council From: Denyse Morrissey, Chief Administrative Officer Report: CAO 2021-01 Subject: Weekend Expansion Pilot Project: Grey County Transit Recommendation Be it Resolved that Council: 1. Receives report CAO 2021-01 regarding Weekend Expansion Pilot Project: Grey County Transit; and that 2. The $25,000 approved in the 2021 budget for two transit shelters be realigned to fund approximately five months of weekend transit service; and that 3. The $8,000 approved in the 2021 budget for seasonal winter maintenance for the two transit shelters be realigned to support local promotions and advertising of the Grey County Transit service in 2021 including the weekend expansion pilot project. Background On May 23, 2019 Grey County and Southgate Township received funding from the Provincial Government to enhance transportation in Grey County and regionally. Grey County received $1,850,000 and Southgate Township received $500,000. They created a partnership using the combined funding of approximately $2.3 million. Report CAO2021-01 Page 1 of 4 There are 6 general routes: Route 1 & 2 Highway 10 Owen Sound to Orangeville Route 3 & 4 Highway 26 Owen Sound to Town of Blue Mountains Route 5 Highway 6 Owen Sound to Wiarton Route 6 Grey Road 4 Flesherton to Walkerton In the planning stages it was determined, one route would operate along Highway 10 from Owen Sound to Orangeville, five days a week Monday to Friday. Buses would depart Owen Sound at appropriate times to ensure riders can arrive on time for employment in Grey Highlands or continue travelling to Dundalk, Shelburne and Orangeville. -
Data Guide, Version
TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY 1996 VERSION 2.1 DATA GUIDE TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY 1996 VERSION 2.1 DATA GUIDE Prepared for the Toronto Area Transportation Planning Data Collection Steering Committee by the Data Management Group Joint Program in Transportation University of Toronto August 1997 Participating Agencies: Ministry of Transportation, Ontario · GO Transit · Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto Toronto Transit Commission · Regional Municipality of Durham Regional Municipality of Halton · Regional Municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth Regional Municipality of Waterloo · Regional Municipality of Niagara Regional Municipality of Peel · Regional Municipality of York · Town of Orangeville Peterborough County · Simcoe County · Victoria County · Wellington County City of Barrie · City of Guelph · City of Peterborough TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword........................................................................................................................ 1 Differences Between the 1986, 1991 and 1996 Data ...................................................... 2 Data Expansion.............................................................................................................. 3 TTS Traffic Zones.......................................................................................................... 7 Greater Toronto Area .........................................................................................................7 Regions External To The Greater Toronto Area ................................................................7