DOCSLIB.ORG

Transportation Tomorrow Survey 2001 Version 1.0 Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Transportation Tomorrow Survey 2001 Version 1.0 Data TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY 2001 VERSION 1.0 DATA GUIDE TRANSPORTATION TOMORROW SURVEY 2001 A Telephone Interview Survey on Household Travel Behaviour in Greater Toronto and the Surrounding Areas Conducted in the Fall of 2000, Fall of 2001 and Spring of 2002 VERSION 1.0 DATA GUIDE Prepared for the Transportation Information Steering Committee by the Data Management Group University of Toronto Joint Program in Transportation January 2003 Participating Agencies: Ministry of Transportation, Ontario • City of Barrie • City of Guelph City of Hamilton • City of Kawartha Lakes • City of Orillia • City of Peterborough City of Toronto • County of Peterborough • County of Simcoe • County of Wellington GO Transit • Regional Municipality of Durham • Regional Municipality of Halton Regional Municipality of Niagara • Regional Municipality of Peel Regional Municipality of York • Toronto Transit Commission • Town of Orangeville TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Differences Between the 1986, 1991, 1996 and 2001 Data........................... 1 2 Data Expansion .............................................................................................. 4 3 Planning Districts ............................................................................................ 8 4 Traffic Zones................................................................................................. 14 5 TTS Databases............................................................................................. 17 5.1 Household Attributes ........................................................................................17 5.2 Person Attributes..............................................................................................20 5.3 Trip Attributes...................................................................................................24 5.4 Transit Attributes ..............................................................................................26 5.4 Station Codes...................................................................................................28 5.5 Transit Operator Codes ....................................................................................29 5.6 Transit Route Codes.........................................................................................31 6 Control Totals For TTS ................................................................................. 43 6.1 Household Tabulations.....................................................................................43 6.2 Person Tabulations...........................................................................................50 6.3 Trip Tabulations................................................................................................64 6.4 Transit Tabulations...........................................................................................80 6.5 2001 Expanded Municipal Transit Totals ..........................................................92 TABLE OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: TTS Databases Number of Records ...............................................................................i Exhibit 2: Interview Language 1986, 1996, 2001............................................................................3 Exhibit 3: Validation of 2001 TTS Expansion Factors (Version 1.0)...............................................5 Exhibit 4: Regions and Planning Districts.......................................................................................8 Exhibit 5: 2001 TTS Survey Area Planning Districts (City of Toronto) .........................................11 Exhibit 6: 2001 TTS Survey Area Planning Districts (Eastern Half) .............................................12 Exhibit 7: 2001 TTS Survey Area Planning Districts (Western Half)............................................13 Exhibit 8: Survey Areas Zone Numbering ....................................................................................14 Exhibit 9: Survey Areas With Non-Sequential Zones ...................................................................15 Exhibit 10: External Area Zone Numbering ..................................................................................16 Exhibit 11: Household Attributes ..................................................................................................17 Exhibit 12: Person Attributes ........................................................................................................20 Exhibit 13: Trip Attributes .............................................................................................................24 Exhibit 14: Transit Attributes.........................................................................................................26 Exbibit 15: TTC Subway Station Codes .......................................................................................28 Exhibit 16: GO Rail Station Codes ...............................................................................................28 Exhibit 17: Transit Operator Codes ..............................................................................................29 Exhibit 18: Transit Route Codes...................................................................................................31 Exhibit 19: Household Tabulations ...............................................................................................43 Exhibit 20: Person Tabulations.....................................................................................................50 Exhibit 21: Trip Tabulations..........................................................................................................64 Exhibit 22: Transit Tabulations .....................................................................................................80 Exhibit 23: 2001 Expanded Municipal Transit Totals....................................................................92 Foreword This manual is designed to give potential users of the 1986, 1991, 1996 and 2001 Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) data an understanding of the contents of the databases maintained at the Data Management Group. Users wishing to obtain information from the databases should contact the Data Management Group or one of the following agencies: Ministry of Transportation, Ontario City of Barrie City of Guelph City of Hamilton City of Kawartha Lakes City of Orillia City of Peterborough City of Toronto County of Peterborough County of Simcoe County County of Wellington GO Transit Regional Municipality of Durham Regional Municipality of Halton Regional Municipality of Niagara Regional Municipality of Peel Regional Municipality of York Toronto Transit Commission Town of Orangeville Users should be aware of the differences in both the content and the areas covered by the survey in each of the four years. This guide is a compilation of information from the original dataguides for the 1986 (Version 3.1), 1991 (Version 4.1), and 1996 (Version 2.1) databases with comparable information for the 2001 survey (Version 1.0). The TTS databases contain the following number of survey records: Exhibit 1: TTS Databases Number of Records 1986 (Version 3.1) 1991 (Version 4.1) 1996 (Version 2.1) 2001 (Version 1.0) Household 61,453 24,507 115,193 136,379 Person 171,086 72,496 312,781 374,182 Non Transit Trips 313,633 142,453 587,676 732,649 Transit Trips 56,615 14,896 70,295 817,744 i 1 Differences Between the 1986, 1991, 1996 and 2001 Data Users of TTS data should be aware of the following differences when making comparisons between the 1986, 1991, 1996 and 2001 Transportation Tomorrow Surveys: Survey Area The 1986 survey covered the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) defined as the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto plus the Regional Municipalities of Durham, York, Peel, Halton and Hamilton. In 1991, the survey area was expanded to cover the municipalities adjacent to the GTA boundary, referred to as the ‘fringe area’. Extending well beyond the boundaries of either of the earlier surveys, the 1996 survey includes all of the GTA plus Peterborough County (partial coverage), City of Peterborough, Victoria County, Town of Orangeville, Simcoe County (partial coverage), City of Barrie, Wellington County (partial coverage), City of Guelph, Waterloo Region and Niagara Region. A small portion of Dufferin County adjacent to the town of Orangeville is also included. Northumberland County is partially represented by interviews conducted during the training of interviewers (week 0). In 2001, changes to the survey area relative to the 1996 TTS were the inclusion of the whole of Simcoe County, the addition of the City of Orillia, and the exclusion of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Northumberland County. Minimum Age In 1986 the minimum age of persons for which trip data was collected was 6. In 1991, 1996 and 2001 the minimum age was 11. Trip data for persons aged 6 through 10 should be excluded from the 1986 survey before making comparisons with 1991, 1996 and/or 2001. Bicycle Trips In 1986 information on bicycle trips was only collected for trips to or from school or work. In 1991, 1996 and 2001 information was collected for all bicycle trips. Trip Start Times In 1986, trip start times were not recorded for some school trips made by persons under the age of 14. In 1991, 1996 and 2001 trip start time was recorded for all trips. This difference must be allowed for in making comparisons of trip start time distributions, particularly for walk, cycle, schoolbus and, to a lesser extent, transit trips. Trip Purpose In
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consat Telematics AB
    Consat Canada Inc. Introduction . Consat . Roger Sauve . Filip Stekovic . Timmins Transit . Jamie Millions . Fred Gerrior Consat Canada Customers Timmins Transit Sudbury Transit Milton Transit Thunder Bay Transit Kawartha Lakes North Bay Transit Timiskaming Shores STM Orillia Transit NYC Kingston Transit Sudbury Municipal solutions Sarnia Transit Orangeville Transit Simcoe Transit Three more to be added in 2019 Mandatory System – AODA | Additional Features . Mandatory system – AODA compliant . Automatic Next Stop Announcement (ANSA) . Calling out stop both audibly and visually . Internally for customers on board and externally for customers at stops and platforms . Additional Features . AVL tracking of vehicles . On time performance . Ridership counts . Real time customer information . Applications for all users . Expandable solution AODA | Automatic Next Stop Announcement (ANSA) . Visual ANSA using internal display . Recorded and/or synthetic announcement voice. Reliable, configurable triggering of announcement (distance/time to stop point). AODA | Automatic Next Stop Announcement (ANSA) . External announcement of vehicle destination when arriving at stop point. Scheduled audio volume setting – minimizes noise pollution at night. Quiet stop points/areas Real time schedule monitoring . Multiple tools to follow vehicles in real-time . Event-based system with continuous updates Tools | Event Monitor & Event History Data Analysis . Specialised reports . Timetable adherence . Route analysis . Ridership analysis . System performance analysis . Vehicle communication . Vehicle speed . Troubleshooting Driver Assistant . Provides the driver real-time timetable adherence, trip information, passenger counts Automatic Passenger Counter Two Way Messaging . Communication between traffic controller and drivers . Controllers can send to single vehicles, groups and even whole routes. Controllers can use and easily create templates, with response options. Controllers have access to a message log.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Report
    Committee Report To: Warden McQueen and Members of Grey County Council Council Date: July 23, 2020 Subject / Report No: CAOR-CW-10-20 Title: Revised Community Transportation Service Delivery and Budget Proposal Prepared by: Stephanie Stewart, Manager, Community Transportation Reviewed by: Kim Wingrove, CAO Lower Tier(s) Affected: Grey County wide Status: Recommendation adopted by Committee as presented per Resolution CW138-20; Endorsed by Council August 13, 2020; Recommendation 1. That report CAOR-CW-10-20 Revised Community Transportation Service Delivery and Budget Proposal be received, and; 2. That staff be directed to negotiate a single source agreement as per the purchasing policy, with Driverseat Inc. to provide services in fulfillment of the provincial Community Transportation grant and the additional Grey Road 4 route between Durham, Hanover and Walkerton, and; 3. That once completed to the satisfaction of the Chief Administrative Officer, the Warden and Clerk be authorized to execute the agreement with Driverseat Inc., and; 4. That the Warden and Clerk be authorized to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with The Corporation of the Township of Southgate, authorizing Grey County to deliver on Southgate’s behalf, a transit service as required by the Provincial Grant awarded to Southgate, and; 5. That the cost to operate the system from September 1 to December 31, 2020, of $213,911, after recoverable HST (excluding Grey Road 4) be funded as per the 2020 budget, and; 6. That should Council wish to proceed with the Grey Road 4 route, the cost to operate the route for the period of September 1 to December 31, 2020 is $30,606, after recoverable HST, to be funded from the One-Time Funding Reserve, with 2021 and 2022 to be included in the annual budget, and; CAOR-CW-10-20 July 23, 2020 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The City of Orillia Operational Review of Orillia Transit Service
    The City of Orillia Operational Review of Orillia Transit Service May 21, 2017 Transit Consulting Network 283 Golf Road, Keswick. Ontario L4P 3C8 City of Orillia Project Team City of Orillia Project Team Wesley Cyr, Manager of Engineering and Transportation Jeff Hunter, Manager of Construction and Transit Doug Johnstone, Project Official III Transit Consulting Network Project Team Principal and Project Manager Wally Beck, C.E.T., President, Project Manager Technical Team Vince Mauceri, Senior Technical Support Nabil Ghariani, P.Eng., Senior Technical Support Kim Laursen, Technical Support The City of Orillia Operational Review of Orillia Transit Service May 10, 2017 Transit Consulting Network 283 Golf Road, Keswick. Ontario L4P 3C8 City of Orillia Project Team City of Orillia Project Team Wesley Cyr, Manager of Engineering and Transportation Jeff Hunter, Manager of Construction and Transit Doug Johnstone, Project Official III Transit Consulting Network Project Team Principal and Project Manager Wally Beck, C.E.T., President, Project Manager Technical Team Vince Mauceri, Senior Technical Support Nabil Ghariani, P.Eng., Senior Technical Support Kim Laursen, Technical Support City of Orillia Operational Review of Orillia Transit Service Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices and Key Considerations For
    BEST PRACTICES AND KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR TRANSIT ELECTRIFICATION AND CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE DEPLOYMENT TO DELIVER PREDICTABLE, RELIABLE, AND COST-EFFECTIVE FLEET SYSTEMS First Published JUNE 2020 Edition 2.0 SEPTEMBER 2020 AUTHORS Dr.Josipa Petrunic, President & CEO Dr. Elnaz Abotalebi, Researcher & Project Lead Dr. Abhishek Raj, Researcher c 2 COPYRIGHT © 2020 Information in this document is to be considered the intellectual property of the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium in accordance with Canadian copyright law. This report was prepared by the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium for the account of Natural Resources Canada. The material in it reflects the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium’s best judgment in light of the information available to it at the time of preparation. Any use that a third party makes of this report or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it are the responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. UPDATE: COVID-19 PUBLICATION IMPACT The publication of this report has been delayed by three months due to the COVID-19 global pandemic. This report, and the majority of research included within it, was completed primarily between September 2019 and March 2020 – prior to the novel coronavirus pandemic affecting local economies and transit revenue across Canada. While efforts have been made to include relevant announcements by Canadian transit agencies since that time, specifically as they relate to electric buses, many investment decisions and funding programs related to municipal green infrastructure deployments may change this year as a result of the financial crisis unfolding in cities across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • C.23 - Cw Info
    APRIL 14, 2015 Page 1 of 93 11. C.23 - CW INFO FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 25, 2015 Pettapiece presents Network Southwest plan to transport minister (Queen’s Park) – When it comes to improved local transportation options, Perth-Wellington MPP Randy Pettapiece wants to get the province on board. Today in the legislature, Pettapiece presented Steven Del Duca, Ontario’s transportation minister, with a copy of the Network Southwest plan unveiled March 18 in St. Marys. “I explained to the minister how important this is to many in our community,” said Pettapiece. “He was very receptive,” he added. The MPP also wrote to the minister on behalf of the 86 people who signed postcards to support the Network Southwest plan. He presented all the postcards directly to the minister along with a full copy of the plan. The postcards state: “High quality intercity transportation, based on rail and bus, is a necessity of any modern nation. Southwestern Ontario has a particular need, due to high road congestion, population density and diverse economic activity.” They also call for a definitive study on the concept plan as outlined by Network Southwest. Pettapiece has written and spoken many times about the importance of improved transportation options – and, in particular, the need to extend GO transit service through Perth-Wellington. Last year the MPP took the extra step of submitting an Order Paper question on the Premier’s stated intention of extending GO transit service to our riding. Pettapiece was not pleased by the response, which made no mention of rural transportation challenges, focusing instead on the government’s promises for the Greater Toronto-Hamilton area.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Meeting July 7, 2020
    NOTICE THE MAYOR HAS CALLED A SPECIAL MEETING OF COUNCIL AT 5:00 P.M. TUESDAY, JULY 7, 2020 IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS - CIVIC SQUARE TO DISCUSS THE FOLLOWING: • A TRADE SECRET OR SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL, COMMERCIAL FINANCIAL OR LABOUR RELATIONS INFORMATION, SUPPLIED IN CONFIDENCE TO THE MUNICIPALITY OR LOCAL BOARD, WHICH, IF DISCLOSED, COULD REASONABLY BE EXPECTED TO PREJUDICE SIGNIFICANTLY THE COMPETIVE POSITION OR INTERFERE SIGNIFICANTLY WITH THE CONTRACTUAL OR OTHER NEGOTIATIONS OF A PERSON, GROUP OF PERSONS, OR ORGANIZATION; - Update regarding developments. • PROPOSED OR PENDING ACQUISITION OR DISPOSITION OF LAND BY THE MUNICIPALITY OR LOCAL BOARD; - Expropriate ofPart ofLot 16 Concession 7 - Designated as Part 1 to 4, Plan 59R- 3342 - City ofWelland. AND IN OPEN SESSION FOLLOWING THE SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIVIC SQUARE TO CONSIDER ANY CORRESPONDENCE, REPORTS, AND BY-LAWS FOLLOWED BY A REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AT 7:00 P.M. IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CIVIC SQUARE TO CONSIDER ANY CORRESPONDENCE, REPORTS, AND BY-LAWS. Due to COVID-19 and the closure ofthe Civic Square All Electronic Meetings can be viewed at: City of Welland website: https:l/www.welland.ca/Council/LiveStream.asp YourTV: The meeting will be aired on channel 700 on July 10, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. ~ - Tara Stephens, City Clerk SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA FOLLOWED BY REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Tuesday, July 7, 2020 Due to COVID-19 and the closure of the Civic Square All Electronic Meetings can be viewed at: City of Welland website: https://www.welland.ca/Council/LiveStream.asp YourTV: The meeting will be aired on channel 700 on July 10, 2020 at 9:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Niagara Transit Service Delivery and Governance Strategy Final Report January 2017 16-3664
    in association with… NIAGARA REGION Niagara Transit Service Delivery and Governance Strategy Final Report January 2017 16-3664 Executive Summary Introduction Since January 2016 the Inter-municipal Transit Working Group has been developing options for an integrated transit system that works for all of Niagara. The Inter-municipal Transit Working Group is led by the Mayors and CAOs from St. Catharines, Niagara Falls and Welland with the support from the Niagara Regional Chair, Niagara Region CAO and technical staff. Dillon Consulting Limited, in association with McNeil Management Services and the Gooderham Group, was retained to assess the existing inter-municipal transit service in Niagara Region and develop potential options for future delivery of inter-municipal transit services for consideration by the Niagara IMT Working Group. This included an assessment of options for service delivery, governance, fare integration, fare payment technology and trip planning. This report presents a service delivery strategy with recommendations for: The elimination of duplicate services servicing post-secondary institutions and the expansion of off-peak services on key inter-municipal corridors; Better integration with other municipal transit systems; New Niagara-West inter-municipal transit link; and New dynamic transit services for low-demand areas. The report also recommends that a Consolidated Transit service delivery and governance structure is implemented, integrating the planning and delivery of local and inter-municipal transit services in St. Catharines, Niagara Falls and Welland into one large consolidated system. Integrated planning and operations would take place through a consolidated governing body, board or commission (from here on out termed “consolidated governing body”) while final decisions on local transit interests would continue to be made by each local council for transit services within their own jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Centre Guide-Spreads
    PEEL HALTON DUFFERIN TRAINING BOARD 33 City Centre Drive, Suite 545, Mississauga, ON L5B 2N5 ph 905.306.9588 toll free 1.800.431.7774 fx 905.306.9588 [email protected] Information for YOU th Services in Burlington, Brampton, Caledon, www.phdtrain.com Dufferin County, Halton Hills, Milton, Mississauga and Oakville i Peel Halton Dufferin Training Board is funded by: a member of The views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect those of the Government of Ontario. Introduction “Every youth owes it to himself and to the world to make the most possible out of the stuff that is in him.” - Orison Swett Marden Information is power. It can also be overwhelming! What to do after high school? How to get a job? How to pay my rent? How can I buy my first car? There are many programs and services right in your community that can help you with these questions and so much more. This guide has been created for young people, like yourself, who want to learn what resources are available to them. Almost all of the programs and services listed in this guide are free. You don’t have to try and figure out everything on your own, and you don’t have to stay in a bad situation. There are answers and solutions to life’s challenges and problems. This is an exciting time in your life filled with lots of choices and decisions. Keep learning; ask questions; and don’t be afraid or embarrassed to ask for help when you need it.
    [Show full text]
  • Word Document Template Blank
    Welcome to Georgian College International student handbook Orillia campus Table of Contents Welcome ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Georgian College- Orillia Campus ..................................................................................................................................... 5 International Staff Profiles – Barrie Campus .................................................................................................................... 6 Staff Profiles- Orillia Campus ............................................................................................................................................ 7 Student Services ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 Co-op and Career .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 SAC Office ..................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Registrar’s Office .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Frequently Asked Questions ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U-Pass Toolkit
    The complete guide to universal transit pass programs at Canadian colleges and universities May 2004 Prepared by Noxon Associates Limited © Canadian Urban Transit Association, 2004 55 York St., Suite 1401 Toronto, ON M5J 1R7 Telephone: (416) 365-9800 Fax: (416) 365-1295 Web: www.cutaactu.ca Table of contents Acknowledgements Chapter 1: Introduction................................................................................................. 1 1.1 The challenges of campus transportation ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 The U-Pass response ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 U-Pass benefits ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 U-Pass challenges.................................................................................................................................................. 4 Chapter 2: The basics................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Where is it happening? ......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 What’s involved? How long does it take?.......................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Who
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Report
    Committee Report To: Warden McQueen and Members of Grey County Council Council Date: April 9, 2020 Subject / Report No: CAOR-CW-05-20 Title: Community Transportation Budget Presentation and Service Level Options Prepared by: Stephanie Stewart, Manager, Community Transportation Reviewed by: Kim Wingrove, CAO Lower Tier(s) Affected: Grey County wide Status: Recommendation 1. That report CAOR-CW-05-20 Community Transportation Budget and Service Level Presentation be received, and; 2. That County Council provide direction on the transportation schedule and required investment, and; 3. That staff finalize the First Student contract, and; 4. That County Council provide direction regarding implementation of service on Grey Road 4. Executive Summary Grey County staff have completed procurement for drivers and vehicles. This report compares costs of varying levels of service from the minimum required to meet the grant requirements to an optimal level to maximize service utility. Council direction on service investments beyond the minimum are required. April 9, 2020 Background and Discussion On May 23rd, 2019 Grey County was pleased to received funding from the Provincial Government to enhance transportation for all resident. Grey County in partnership with the Township of Southgate received approximately $2.3 million in funding. On July 2nd, 2019 staff began engaging stakeholders to gain a comprehensive understanding of the unique needs of the residents in Grey County. On August 23rd, 2019, Grey County released a Negotiated RFP seeking a transportation service provider to develop an innovative “Made in Grey” solution. Staff had numerous conversations with the top RFP respondent, however, staff concluded that it would not be in the best interest of Grey County to contract the entire service out to, due to cost and reduced control measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Cps-2-2020-1
    70 PINE STREET, BRACEBRIDGE, ONTARIO P1L 1N3 Telephone (705) 645-2231 / Fax (705) 645-5319 / 1-800-461-4210 (705 area code) www.muskoka.on.ca To: Chair and Members Community and Planning Services Committee From: Jacquie Evans Transportation Network Coordinator Summer Valentine Director of Planning Date: February 20, 2020 Subject: Five Year Transportation Needs Assessment and Growth and Sustainability Plan – Project Update Report: CPS-2-2020-1 Recommendation This report is provided for information. Origin Following successful applications to the Community Transportation Grant and Ontario Gas Tax funding programs, the Five Year Transportation Needs Assessment and Growth and Sustainability Plan project was initiated with the goal of creating a community transportation network that effectively serves Muskoka, with a focus on vulnerable residents. To that end and to ensure the available funding is spent efficiently, an external consultant was retained to assess transportation needs and challenges and to recommend solutions. The project is now at the point where the consultant is seeking additional feedback from stakeholders and the Community and Planning Services (CPS) Committee on potential transportation options before finalizing their report and recommendations. Background information can be found in Report CPS-11-2019-7, and a summary of transportation funding sources currently being received by The District Municipality of Muskoka (the District) is included in Appendix “I”. Background Funding in the amount of $674,382 was secured through a Community Transportation Grant from the Ministry of Transportation. Total funding for community transportation initiatives also includes Provincial Gas Tax Funds and District contributions. The Community Transportation Grant is to be flowed from 2019-2023, and the other funding sources may vary annually depending on a variety of factors but are anticipated to be approximately $110,600 per year.
    [Show full text]