DOCSLIB.ORG

Towards Coordinated Rural Transportation Full Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Towards Coordinated Rural Transportation Full Report TOWARDS COORDINATED RURAL TRANSPORTATION: A Resource Guide AUGUST 2014 - i ACCELERATING RURAL TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS Lack of transportation is a significant issue in all rural and remote communities in Ontario which affects most of the determinants of health. This report is a product of the ACCELERATING RURAL TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS initiative; a collaboration between the Rural Ontario Institute and the Ontario Healthy Communities Coalition. The purpose of this initiative is to enhance and strengthen the sharing of knowledge of effective models and emerging innovation in rural regional transportation. This project received funding from The Ontario Trillium Foundation, an agency of the Ontario government. The members of the study team that contributed to this report include the following: STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS Norman Ragetlie, Rural Ontario Institute Rob Black, Rural Ontario Institute Scott Currie, Rural Ontario Institute Lorna McCue, Ontario Healthy Communities Coalition Lisa Tolentino, Ontario Healthy Communities Coalition Brad Smith, Ride Norfolk Scott Butler, Ontario Good Roads Association CONSULTANT PROJECT TEAM Dennis Kar, RPP, MCIP, Dillon Consulting Limited Richard Puccini, P.Eng, Dillon Consulting Limited Stephanie Simard, RPP, MCIP, Dillon Consulting Limited Morgan Boyco, RPP, MCIP, Dillon Consulting Limited Special appreciation is extended to the lead organizations in the three study regions who contributed to the assessment and assisted with engaging local stakeholders, namely: Wellington County, Headwaters Communities in Action and Dufferin County, and in Leeds and Grenville, Every Kid in Our Communities and the Employment & Education Centre. For more on other resources or documents created through the Accelerating Rural Transportation Solutions initiative, visit http://ruralontarioinstitute.ca/resources-reports/ TOWARDS COORDINATED RURAL TRANSPORTATION: A Resource Guide AUGUST 2014 - ii This page left intentionally blank TOWARDS COORDINATED RURAL TRANSPORTATION: A Resource Guide AUGUST 2014 - iii Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1 1.1 The Challenge of Providing Rural Transportation .............................................................................. 1 1.2 Coordinated Rural Transportation ..................................................................................................... 2 1.3 How to Use This Document ................................................................................................................ 4 2.0 CONTEXT FOR COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION IN RURAL ENVIRONMENTS ...........................7 2.1 Coordinated Transportation – A Definition ........................................................................................ 7 2.2 Benefits of Coordinated Transportation ............................................................................................. 7 2.3 The Rural Context ............................................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Existing Community Transportation in Rural Areas ......................................................................... 14 2.5 Is Coordination Right For You?......................................................................................................... 19 3.0 COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION MODELS .......................................................................... 21 3.1 Model 1: Centralized Control ........................................................................................................... 22 3.2 Model 2: Brokerage – Central Coordination .................................................................................... 24 3.3 Model 3: Brokerage – Confirmation Based ...................................................................................... 26 3.4 Model 4: Voluntary Cooperation Model .......................................................................................... 28 4.0 THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF A COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION MODEL ................................. 31 4.1 Service Planning ............................................................................................................................... 32 4.2 Customer Service and Complaint Handling ..................................................................................... 34 4.3 Intake Process .................................................................................................................................. 37 4.4 Marketing / Awareness .................................................................................................................... 41 4.5 Scheduling and Dispatch .................................................................................................................. 43 4.6 Passenger Fares ................................................................................................................................ 48 4.7 Eligibility Criteria .............................................................................................................................. 51 4.8 Policies and Procedures ................................................................................................................... 54 4.9 Vehicle Purchase .............................................................................................................................. 55 4.10 Vehicle Maintenance ...................................................................................................................... 58 TOWARDS COORDINATED RURAL TRANSPORTATION: A Resource Guide AUGUST 2014 - iv 4.11 Driver Training................................................................................................................................. 59 4.12 Volunteer Recruitment and Training ............................................................................................. 61 5.0 STEPS REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH A COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION MODEL ........................ 65 STEP 1 - Identify Two or More Organizations that Share a Common Goal ............................................. 66 STEP 2 - Inventory Existing Transportation Services and Key Stakeholders ........................................... 71 STEP 3 - Identify Service Demand and Gaps/Implementation Issues and Opportunities ...................... 76 STEP 4 - Assess Different Coordination Models ...................................................................................... 82 STEP 5 - Identify the Building Blocks of the Preferred Coordination Models ......................................... 85 STEP 6 - Select a Preferred Coordination Model .................................................................................... 88 6.0 FUNDING OPTIONS FOR COORDINATED TRANSPORTATION ................................................... 93 6.1 Passenger Fare Revenue .................................................................................................................. 93 6.2 Other Operating Revenue ................................................................................................................ 94 6.3 Municipal Subsidy ............................................................................................................................ 95 6.4 Provincial Gas Tax Program .............................................................................................................. 96 6.5 LHIN Funding .................................................................................................................................... 99 6.6 Federal Gas Tax Program ............................................................................................................... 100 6.7 Other Funding Sources ................................................................................................................... 101 7.0 STUDY REGION ASSESSMENTS ............................................................................................. 103 7.1 Wellington County ........................................................................................................................ 105 7.2 Dufferin County .............................................................................................................................. 135 7.3 United Counties of Leeds and Grenville ......................................................................................... 165 List of Figures Figure 1 - County of Wellington ................................................................................................................ 107 Figure 2 - Wellington County 2011 Population Pyramid .......................................................................... 110 Figure 3 - Potential Corridors Services in Wellington County ................................................................... 132 Figure 4 - Dufferin County Map ................................................................................................................ 138 TOWARDS COORDINATED RURAL TRANSPORTATION: A Resource Guide AUGUST 2014 - v Figure 5 - Dufferin County Population Pyramid ........................................................................................ 139 Figure 6 - Potential Corridor Service between Shelburne and Orangeville .............................................. 161 Figure 7 - United Counties of Leeds & Grenville ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consat Telematics AB
    Consat Canada Inc. Introduction . Consat . Roger Sauve . Filip Stekovic . Timmins Transit . Jamie Millions . Fred Gerrior Consat Canada Customers Timmins Transit Sudbury Transit Milton Transit Thunder Bay Transit Kawartha Lakes North Bay Transit Timiskaming Shores STM Orillia Transit NYC Kingston Transit Sudbury Municipal solutions Sarnia Transit Orangeville Transit Simcoe Transit Three more to be added in 2019 Mandatory System – AODA | Additional Features . Mandatory system – AODA compliant . Automatic Next Stop Announcement (ANSA) . Calling out stop both audibly and visually . Internally for customers on board and externally for customers at stops and platforms . Additional Features . AVL tracking of vehicles . On time performance . Ridership counts . Real time customer information . Applications for all users . Expandable solution AODA | Automatic Next Stop Announcement (ANSA) . Visual ANSA using internal display . Recorded and/or synthetic announcement voice. Reliable, configurable triggering of announcement (distance/time to stop point). AODA | Automatic Next Stop Announcement (ANSA) . External announcement of vehicle destination when arriving at stop point. Scheduled audio volume setting – minimizes noise pollution at night. Quiet stop points/areas Real time schedule monitoring . Multiple tools to follow vehicles in real-time . Event-based system with continuous updates Tools | Event Monitor & Event History Data Analysis . Specialised reports . Timetable adherence . Route analysis . Ridership analysis . System performance analysis . Vehicle communication . Vehicle speed . Troubleshooting Driver Assistant . Provides the driver real-time timetable adherence, trip information, passenger counts Automatic Passenger Counter Two Way Messaging . Communication between traffic controller and drivers . Controllers can send to single vehicles, groups and even whole routes. Controllers can use and easily create templates, with response options. Controllers have access to a message log.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Government Supports
    Ministry of Economic Development, Job Creation and Trade Revision Update: August 12th, 2020 @ 4:30PM Table of Contents COVID-19 – Provincial Government – Ontario’s Action Plan –Economic and Fiscal Update – Support for Businesses and Individuals 2. August 12th - Ontario Provides Update to Ontario's Action Plan: Responding to COVID- 1. Ontario Releases 2020-21 First Quarter 19 Finances 3. March 25th - Ontario's Action Plan: Responding to COVID-19 (March 2020 Economic and Fiscal Update) COVID-19 – Provincial Government – Support for Businesses 8. July 31st - Ontario Implementing Additional Measures at Bars and Restaurants to Help 2. August 12th - Ontario Providing Municipalities Limit the Spread of COVID-19 with up to $1.6 Billion in First Round of Emergency Funding 9. July 27th - Historic Agreement Delivers up to $4 Billion to Support Municipalities and 3. August 7th - Ontario Continues on the Path of Transit Renewal, Growth, and Economic Recovery 10. July 24th - Ontario Announces Support for 4. August 6th - Canada and Ontario invest in York University's New Markham Centre roads and bridges, connecting rural Campus communities 11. July 23rd - Ontario Supports Indigenous 5. August 6th - Investing in the Future of Businesses During COVID-19 Ontario's Tourism Industry 12. July 22nd - Ontario Legislature Adjourns after 6. August 4th - Province Supporting Innovative Significant Sitting in Response to COVID-19 Made-in-Ontario Technology to Sanitize PPE 13. July 22nd - Canada and Ontario invest in 7. July 31st (Update)- Ontario-Canada bridges and a road for rural communities in Emergency Commercial Rent Assistance Southern Ontario Program - Ontario Provides Urgent Relief for Small Businesses and Landlords – 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Cochrane Transit Task Force Local Transit
    TOWN OF COCHRANE TRANSIT TASK FORCE LOCAL TRANSIT SERVICE RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL August 30, 2018 Contents Section 1: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 Section 2: THE TRANSIT TASK FORCE ....................................................................................................... 8 Section 3: BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 GreenTRIP Funding & Allocation .................................................................................................... 10 3.2 GreenTRIP Funding Conditions ....................................................................................................... 11 Section 4: FINANCIAL RISK ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 12 Section 5: PREVIOUS FIXED ROUTE OPTIONS ......................................................................................... 15 Section 6: THE RATIONAL OF PUBLIC TRANSIT ...................................................................................... 18 6.1 Local Transit Initial Assessment of Other Municipalities .............................................................. 18 6.2 Economic Rational for Transit ........................................................................................................ 21 6.3 Regional Traffic Congestion & Time and Fuel Savings ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Report
    Committee Report To: Warden McQueen and Members of Grey County Council Council Date: July 23, 2020 Subject / Report No: CAOR-CW-10-20 Title: Revised Community Transportation Service Delivery and Budget Proposal Prepared by: Stephanie Stewart, Manager, Community Transportation Reviewed by: Kim Wingrove, CAO Lower Tier(s) Affected: Grey County wide Status: Recommendation adopted by Committee as presented per Resolution CW138-20; Endorsed by Council August 13, 2020; Recommendation 1. That report CAOR-CW-10-20 Revised Community Transportation Service Delivery and Budget Proposal be received, and; 2. That staff be directed to negotiate a single source agreement as per the purchasing policy, with Driverseat Inc. to provide services in fulfillment of the provincial Community Transportation grant and the additional Grey Road 4 route between Durham, Hanover and Walkerton, and; 3. That once completed to the satisfaction of the Chief Administrative Officer, the Warden and Clerk be authorized to execute the agreement with Driverseat Inc., and; 4. That the Warden and Clerk be authorized to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with The Corporation of the Township of Southgate, authorizing Grey County to deliver on Southgate’s behalf, a transit service as required by the Provincial Grant awarded to Southgate, and; 5. That the cost to operate the system from September 1 to December 31, 2020, of $213,911, after recoverable HST (excluding Grey Road 4) be funded as per the 2020 budget, and; 6. That should Council wish to proceed with the Grey Road 4 route, the cost to operate the route for the period of September 1 to December 31, 2020 is $30,606, after recoverable HST, to be funded from the One-Time Funding Reserve, with 2021 and 2022 to be included in the annual budget, and; CAOR-CW-10-20 July 23, 2020 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Stratégique Du Sentier Récréatif Régional De Prescott Et Russell
    City of Clarence-Rockland Transit Feasibility Study Final Report October 2014 Final Report : Clarence-Rockland Transit Feasibility Study City of Clarence-Rockland Transit Feasibility Study Final Report MMM Project Number: 3414021 October 2014 ii Project Number – 3414021 – October 2014 Clarence-Rockland... a quiet, picturesque city nestled on the shores of the historic Ottawa River, an important waterway for early explorers, fur traders and missionaries. With its humble beginnings as a lumber town almost 140 years ago, Clarence-Rockland has matured into a beautiful city of a little over 20,000 people. Situated just 32 kilometers east of Parliament Hill and about 170 kilometers west of Montreal, the area offers both the quiet of the countryside and the urban offerings of a big city. Along with a healthy distribution of nature's splendor there's also plenty of things to keep urbanites busy. We are a fully bilingual community with a full range of churches, schools and sports facilities which offer endless choices for those who have grown accustomed to essential amenities. (From: http://www.clarence-rockland.com/index.php/en/ - July 7, 2014) Project Number – 3414021 – October 2014 i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Purpose and objectives ................................................................................ 1 1.2 Organization of the report ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BUS HISTORY ASSOCIATION 2019 CONVENTION Ottawa on and Gatineau QC – Wednesday, June 5Th to Saturday, June 8Th All Photos by Kevin Nicol, Unless Otherwise Indicated
    BUS HISTORY ASSOCIATION 2019 CONVENTION Ottawa ON and Gatineau QC – Wednesday, June 5th to Saturday, June 8th All photos by Kevin Nicol, unless otherwise indicated The Bus History Association (BHA) convention was held in Ottawa this year. It had been 16 years (2003) since the BHA held their convention there. As with the past 3 Canadian conventions (Montreal, Quebec City, Vancouver), Mario Seneviratne organized a fan trip on the day before the start of the convention. Société de transport de l’Outaouais (STO) is one of the few remaining transit systems in Canada that still operates high floor vehicles (not including cutaways). STO, along with Coast Mountain Bus Company (Orion V suburbans), Sarnia (1 Orion V) and Cold Lake (2 Classics as back up) are the only systems that still operate the venerable buses. Their days are clearly numbered though except possibly for Vancouver where they have a few years left. STO still operates MCI Classics that formerly operated in Calgary. Bus # 9136 was chosen for the charter which is ex-Calgary # 5106. The charter started at Terrasses de la Chaudière in Gatineau. BHA members had to take regular transit to get to the start location and most rode OC Transpo route 97 from the host hotel of Hilton Garden Inn and Suites – Ottawa Airport. Upon arriving at Mackenzie King bridge, we alighted route 97 and transferred to route 44 for the ride to Gatineau. People who arrived early were able to take many photos. OC Transpo services Terrasses and one of the new Nova LFS buses arrived during our time there.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices and Key Considerations For
    BEST PRACTICES AND KEY CONSIDERATIONS FOR TRANSIT ELECTRIFICATION AND CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE DEPLOYMENT TO DELIVER PREDICTABLE, RELIABLE, AND COST-EFFECTIVE FLEET SYSTEMS First Published JUNE 2020 Edition 2.0 SEPTEMBER 2020 AUTHORS Dr.Josipa Petrunic, President & CEO Dr. Elnaz Abotalebi, Researcher & Project Lead Dr. Abhishek Raj, Researcher c 2 COPYRIGHT © 2020 Information in this document is to be considered the intellectual property of the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium in accordance with Canadian copyright law. This report was prepared by the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium for the account of Natural Resources Canada. The material in it reflects the Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium’s best judgment in light of the information available to it at the time of preparation. Any use that a third party makes of this report or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it are the responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility of such third parties. The Canadian Urban Transit Research and Innovation Consortium accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. UPDATE: COVID-19 PUBLICATION IMPACT The publication of this report has been delayed by three months due to the COVID-19 global pandemic. This report, and the majority of research included within it, was completed primarily between September 2019 and March 2020 – prior to the novel coronavirus pandemic affecting local economies and transit revenue across Canada. While efforts have been made to include relevant announcements by Canadian transit agencies since that time, specifically as they relate to electric buses, many investment decisions and funding programs related to municipal green infrastructure deployments may change this year as a result of the financial crisis unfolding in cities across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • OPS 19-54 Contract Award RFP 2019-012 Transit Operations.Docx
    Page 1 of 8 Subject: Contract Award for RFP 2019-012 Transit Operations Report Number: OPS 19-54 Author: Kevin De Leebeeck, P.Eng., Director of Operations Meeting Type: Council Meeting Meeting Date: Monday, December 9, 2019 RECOMMENDATION THAT Council receive Report OPS 19-54 Contract Award for RFP 2019-012 Transit Operations; AND THAT Council Award RFP 2019-012 to 947465 Ontario Ltd., o/a Voyago at the revised pricing as outlined in this report. BACKGROUND On October 28, 2019 Council directed staff to negotiate with highest scoring proponent to reduce operating costs on both the Inter-Community Transit Project and the In-Town T:GO service and to negotiate with the Ministry of Transportation to amend the scope of the Inter-Community Transportation Project. DISCUSSION Staff held a series of meetings with the contractor to find efficiencies to reduce the operating costs for both the Inter-Community Transit Project and the In-Town T:GO service. Inter-Community Transit Project: The following are the amendments to the Inter-Community Transportation Project: Service commencement changes from January 1, 2020 to April 1, 2020. This start date aligns with the County of Middlesex Inter-Community Transit Project start date. The number of trips on Route 1 (Tillsonburg to Woodstock and Ingersoll loop) changes from six trips per day to five trips per day and remains at five trips per day for the duration of the contract. The original funding agreement with the Province had a service frequency increase on Route 1 as ridership increased over the term of the Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Transportation Agreement
    January 28, 2020 Page 1 of 96 8 d - CC County Council Meeting Date: JANUARY 28, 2020 Submitted by: CINDY HOWARD, GM FINANCE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES AND MORGAN CALVERT, DIRECTOR ITS SUBJECT: COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION SERVICE OPERATOR AND SERVICE AGREEMENT BACKGROUND: On April 30, 2018, Middlesex County received a letter confirming our eligibility for funding for the Intercommunity Bus project up to $1,500,000. A letter was also received on January 30, 2019 confirming that the Government of Ontario would support the County through the advancement of the municipal stream of the Community Transportation Grant Program. The Community Transportation Grant Program Transfer Payment Agreement was received on July 4, 2019. On July 16, 2019, Middlesex County Council approved the Community Transportation Grant Program Transfer Payment Agreement for the implementation of a microtransit service connecting the communities of Thames Centre with Woodstock and London. On August 13, 2019 the Transfer Payment Agreement was signed by the Province. ANALYSIS: In accordance with section A5.1 Acquisition, of the Transfer Payment Agreement: “If the Recipient acquires goods or services, or both, with the Funds, it will: a) Do so through a process that promotes the best value for money; and b) Comply with the Broader Public Sector Accountability Act, 2010 (Ontario) including any procurement directive issued thereunder, to the extent applicable.” Middlesex County released an Expression of Interest – Middlesex County Community Transportation Project (as attached), which was used to collect and evaluate responses from service operators for the potential provision of a micro-transit service that will link January 28, 2020 Page 2 of 96 8 d - CC communities in the Municipality of Thames Centre with Woodstock and London.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Centre Guide-Spreads
    PEEL HALTON DUFFERIN TRAINING BOARD 33 City Centre Drive, Suite 545, Mississauga, ON L5B 2N5 ph 905.306.9588 toll free 1.800.431.7774 fx 905.306.9588 [email protected] Information for YOU th Services in Burlington, Brampton, Caledon, www.phdtrain.com Dufferin County, Halton Hills, Milton, Mississauga and Oakville i Peel Halton Dufferin Training Board is funded by: a member of The views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect those of the Government of Ontario. Introduction “Every youth owes it to himself and to the world to make the most possible out of the stuff that is in him.” - Orison Swett Marden Information is power. It can also be overwhelming! What to do after high school? How to get a job? How to pay my rent? How can I buy my first car? There are many programs and services right in your community that can help you with these questions and so much more. This guide has been created for young people, like yourself, who want to learn what resources are available to them. Almost all of the programs and services listed in this guide are free. You don’t have to try and figure out everything on your own, and you don’t have to stay in a bad situation. There are answers and solutions to life’s challenges and problems. This is an exciting time in your life filled with lots of choices and decisions. Keep learning; ask questions; and don’t be afraid or embarrassed to ask for help when you need it.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Report
    Committee Report To: Warden McQueen and Members of Grey County Council Council Date: April 9, 2020 Subject / Report No: CAOR-CW-05-20 Title: Community Transportation Budget Presentation and Service Level Options Prepared by: Stephanie Stewart, Manager, Community Transportation Reviewed by: Kim Wingrove, CAO Lower Tier(s) Affected: Grey County wide Status: Recommendation 1. That report CAOR-CW-05-20 Community Transportation Budget and Service Level Presentation be received, and; 2. That County Council provide direction on the transportation schedule and required investment, and; 3. That staff finalize the First Student contract, and; 4. That County Council provide direction regarding implementation of service on Grey Road 4. Executive Summary Grey County staff have completed procurement for drivers and vehicles. This report compares costs of varying levels of service from the minimum required to meet the grant requirements to an optimal level to maximize service utility. Council direction on service investments beyond the minimum are required. April 9, 2020 Background and Discussion On May 23rd, 2019 Grey County was pleased to received funding from the Provincial Government to enhance transportation for all resident. Grey County in partnership with the Township of Southgate received approximately $2.3 million in funding. On July 2nd, 2019 staff began engaging stakeholders to gain a comprehensive understanding of the unique needs of the residents in Grey County. On August 23rd, 2019, Grey County released a Negotiated RFP seeking a transportation service provider to develop an innovative “Made in Grey” solution. Staff had numerous conversations with the top RFP respondent, however, staff concluded that it would not be in the best interest of Grey County to contract the entire service out to, due to cost and reduced control measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Situational Analysis Norfolk County Parks, Facilities and Recreation Master Plan
    June, 2015 SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS NORFOLK COUNTY PARKS, FACILITIES AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN Submitted by: Cover Page Image Source: www.flickr.com 509-318 Homer St Vancouver BC Canada V6B 2V2 | p: 604.899.3806 | f: 604.899.3805 51 Wolseley Street Toronto ON Canada M5T 1A4| p: 416.645.7033 | f: 416 645 7046 [email protected] | www.elac.ca E. Lees & Associates Consulting Ltd. June, 2015 The Corporation of Norfolk County County Administration Building 50 Colbourne Street, South Simcoe, Ontario N3Y 4H3 Attention: Frank Sams, Manager, Parks Facilities and Recreation Dear Mr. Sams, Re: Final Situational Analysis – Norfolk County Parks, Facilities and Recreation Master Plan and Feasibility Study LEES+Associates in partnership with F.J. Galloway Associates Inc. and Nicholson Sheffield Architects Inc., is pleased to submit the final Situational Analysis for the Norfolk County Parks, Facilities and Recreation Master Plan and Feasibility Study. We have incorporated a wide range of background information, trends and best practices, empirical observations, and input through multiple consultation methods to develop this final analysis. It represents a distillation of these inputs into a document that has also set the stage for developing a community-driven vision and principles to guide future parks and recreation decision making in the County. We are pleased to submit the final Situational Analysis, along with the Final Master Plan and Feasibility Study. Yours Truly, Erik Lees, BLA, CSLA, MCIP, RPP LEES+Associates Contact Information: 509-318 Homer St, Vancouver BC Canada, V6B 2V2 | p: 604.899.3806 | f: 604.899.3805 51 Wolseley Street, Toronto ON Canada, M5T 1A4 | p: 416.645.7033 | f: 416.645.7046 [email protected] | www.elac.ca Norfolk County – Situational Analysis LEES+Associates - i - Norfolk County – Situational Analysis CONTENTS SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]