DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Cleveland Location in the NOACA Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Cleveland Location in the NOACA Region CITY OF C LEVEL AND T HE C ITY OF C LEVELAND R OADWAY P AVEMENT M AINTENANCE R EPORT T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 2. Background ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3. PART I: 2016 Pavement Condition ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 4. PART II: 2018 Current Backlog ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 5. PART III: Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) Program ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 6. PART IV: Comparative Analysis ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 7. Appendix ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 38 M APS 1: City of Cleveland Location in the NOACA Region ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2: 2016 City of Cleveland Pavement Condition ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 F IGURES 1: 2016 Cleveland Pavement Network Condition Chart by Lane-Miles ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 2: The PCR Acceptable Level and “Need Year” Relation .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 3: Average PCR Comparison by the Constraint Scenarios and by Year ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 37 T ABLES 1: Selected Pavement Treatments and Their Planning Level Costs ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2: 2016 Cleveland Pavement Network Condition ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 3: 2016 City of Cleveland Pavement Condition Listing ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 4: Performance Comparison of the Constraint Scenarios ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 A PPENDIX The “2018 Current Backlog” Pavement Treatment List ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 The “Maintain 15% Deficiency” Pavement Treatment List ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 The “Maintain an Average Network PCR of 80” Pavement Treatment List ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 The “Maintain Lowest Standard PCR” Pavement Treatment List ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 65 The “M&R” Pavement Treatment List and Map ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 82 1 | Page T HE C ITY OF C LEVELAND R OADWAY P AVEMENT M AINTENANCE R EPORT E XECUTIVE S UMMARY The 2016 Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) pavement database has 3,626 segment records for the Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency (NOACA) region. The NOACA region has a total of 3,330 centerline miles of roadways including freeways and federal-aid highways which is equivalent to 8,561 lane-miles. The regional segment average Pavement Condition Ratings (PCR) is about 77. In the City of Cleveland there are 318.98 centerline miles of federal-aid roads, which are equivalent to 1,098.17 lane-miles within the city boundary that include Interstate 71 (I 71), Interstate 77 (I 77), Interstate 90 (I 90), Interstate 480 (I 480), Interstate 490 (I 490), U. S. Route 6 (US 6), U. S. Route 20 (US 20), U. S. Route 42 (US 42), U. S. Route 322 (US 322), U. S. Route 422 (US 422), State Route 176 (SR 176), State Route 2 (SR 2), State Route 8 (SR 8), State Route 10 (SR 10), State Route 14 (SR 14), State Route 17 (SR 17), State Route 43 (SR 43), State Route 87 (SR 87), State Route 94 (SR 94), State Route 237 (SR 237), and State Route 283 (SR 283). The 2016 ODOT pavement database has 622 segment records for the City of Cleveland roadway system. Each record comprises of several fields of various information and measures such as Street name, Length (miles), Lane-miles length, Number of Lanes, Function Class, Pavement Condition Ratings (PCR), etc. According to the PCR measure, about 54 percent of the pavement lane-miles are currently in the “Good” to “Very Good” condition. About 15 percent of the lane-miles are in the “Poor” to “Very Poor” status and demand some kind of immediate preventive maintenance and /or rehabilitation treatments. This pavement study includes four parts: • Part I: The 2016 pavement network condition, • Part II: The 2018 backlog, • Part III: The Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) program, • Part IV: The Comparative analysis. Considering the five-year study period of 2018 – 2022, this pavement study focuses on the required preventive maintenance treatments and some rehabilitation techniques rather than reconstruction. Part I of this study analyzes the 2016 pavement network condition and tabulates the important information of all the 622 road segments in the City of Cleveland. In Part II, the backlog is defined as the cost of pavement rehabilitation of all roads within one year (2018) and bringing the average network PCR to 80. Backlog is a “snapshot” or relative measure of outstanding rehabilitation work. Part III introduces the optimal preventive maintenance and rehabilitation strategy for each segment and its recommended implementation year based on the NOACA maintenance decision tree. Finally, Part IV compares the backlog and the “M&R” program with the NOACA transportation asset management strategies. All these strategies were compared regarding their costs, the average network PCR and percent of the lane-miles below the acceptable level. 2 | Page T HE C ITY OF C LEVELAND R OADWAY P AVEMENT M AINTENANCE R EPORT B ACKGROUND The City of Cleveland is the county seat for Cuyahoga County and is located on the southern shore of Lake Erie. Cleveland was named on July 22, 1796, when surveyors of the Connecticut Land Company laid out Connecticut's Western Reserve into townships and a capital city. They named it "Cleaveland" after their
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2006 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Kenneth J
    2006 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Kenneth J. Wright, PE Thomas G. Leech, PE, SE HDR Engineering, Inc. Gannett Fleming, Inc. General Chair Magazine Chair M. Myint Lwin, PE, SE Herbert M. Mandel, PE Federal Highway GAI Consultants, Inc. Administration Technical Program Chair Matthew P. McTish, PE McTish, Kunkel & Associates Al M. Ahmed, PE Exhibits Chair A&A Consultants Inc. Gerald Pitzer, PE Michael J. Alterio GAI Consultants, Inc. Alpha Structures Inc. Gary Runco, PE Carl Angeloff, PE Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. Bayer MaterialScience, LLC Seminars Chair Awards Chair Helena Russell Victor E. Bertolina, PE Bridge, design & engineering SAI Consulting Engineers Awards – Vice Chair Budget Chair Louis J. Ruzzi, PE Enrico T. Bruschi, PE Pennsylvania Department DMJM Harris of Transportation Jeffrey J. Campbell, PE Thomas J. Vena, PE Michael Baker, Jr., Inc. Allegheny County Department of Public Works Richard Connors, PE, PMP McCormick Taylor, Inc. Lisle E. Williams, PE, PLS Rules Chair DMJM Harris Attendance & Co-Sponsors James D. Dwyer Chair STV, Inc. Emeritus Committee Gary L. Graham, PE Members Pennsylvania Turnpike Joel Abrams, PhD Commission Consultant Kent A. Harries, PhD, PEng Reidar Bjorhovde, PhD University of Pittsburgh The Bjorhovde Group Student Awards Chair Steven Fenves, PhD Donald W. Herbert, PE NIST Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Arthur W. Hedgren, Jr., PhD, PE Donald Killmeyer, Jr., PE Consultant ms consultants, inc. Tour Chair John F. Graham, Jr., PE Graham Consulting Inc. Eric S. Kline KTA-Tator, Inc. Keynote & Special Interest Session Chair ADVANCING BRIDGE TECHNOLOGY GLOBALLY ○○○○○○ ○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○○ 1 2006 CHAIRMAN’S MESSAGE Kenneth J. Wright, PE HDR Engineering, Inc. 2006 IBC General Chairman As this year’s General Chairman, I am pleased to wel- come you to the 2006 International Bridge Conference in Pittsburgh, the “City of Bridges”.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Cleveland Operations
    Directions to Cleveland Works 1600 Harvard Avenue Cleveland, OH 44105 Please note that there are no sleeping areas at this facility. You must stop at a rest area or truck stop. From Interstate 71 th North bound: Take 1-71 North to Exit 247A, W. 14 St. and Clark Ave. Make a right at the end of the exit ramp. nd Then take route 176 south, approx. ¼ mile on your left. Harvard Ave. will be your 2 exit. At the end of the rd ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be at the 3 traffic light on your right. ¾ Closest Rest Area Exit 209, Lodi From Interstate 77 North bound: Take 1-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave). At the end of the ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be about 1 mile on your left. ¾ Closest Rest Area Exit 111, North Canton From Interstate 80 East East or West bound: Exit 11 / 173 to I-77 North. Take I-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave). At the end of the ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be about 1 mile on your left. ¾ Closest Rest Area East Bound between exits 10 / 161 and 11 / 173 West Bound between exits 14 / 209 and 13A / 193 From Interstate 480 East bound: Exit 17 onto Route 176 North. Exit onto Harvard Ave. Take a right onto Harvard Ave. Gate 6 will rd be at the 3 traffic light on your right. ¾ Closest Rest Area None West bound: Exit 20B onto I-77 North. Take 1-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave).
    [Show full text]
  • 1963 1963 the the of of of of Description Description
    e y ~ 'rte ~ 4 ~ ~~~. ~ ~ ~L +i's 's' ~ *" a~t,y'" J ^ ,..,T+s d az' ~ 8a•. ~r ~ ~Y. r~ ,~ } ~„ ~"' y s'~ ~- ~- N ~, 4 r ~ ts~ 0 ~ i~° e~ ~" t ~ y ~ _ ~ ~ y ^: *} ~ }t. ~ `/ ~ 6~ Y ~p S d~Y R" vW # ' `i ti r n' ke~s ~ J ~ ~ ~~ +3 ~ y t ~r x. t' ~ ~~ ~i _ ~.~y ~g x ,. 9~ :~ ~ x aaa+ra.. "' ~$ .;~w~.v 'Y~1se~n ~+~.~-*a fir;.: ~. ,... §~~`" u, a ., .. ~.: w Letters of Transmittal December 9, 1963 December 9, 1963 JOHN ERRECA EDMUND G. BROWN Director of Public Works Governor of California State of California My dear Governor: Dear Sir: The 17th Annual Report of the Division of Highways, Depart- In compliance with Section 143 of the Streets and Highways ment of Public Works, which I am pleased to submit to you, Code, the 17th Annual Report of the Division of Highways for presents a broad picture of the state highway program during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1963, is submitted herewith fiscal year 1962-63. It describes the steady progress in planning for your approval and transmittal to Governor Edmund G. and constructing today for tomorrow's transportation needs, as Brown. well as the activities of the division's various units. The report contains information on the construction program Your attention is invited to the comments contained in the through the end of 1963 and a description of the projects in enclosed letter of transmittal from the State Highway Engineer the budget for fiscal year 1964-65 which the California High- regarding progress on the interstate system and on the network way Commission adopted in October.
    [Show full text]
  • Competitive Analysis February 2020 Elk Grove Village Business Park Competitive Analysis Introduction
    ELK GROVE VILLAGE BUSINESS PARK COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS FEBRUARY 2020 ELK GROVE VILLAGE BUSINESS PARK COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS INTRODUCTION SB Friedman Development Advisors was engaged by Elk Grove Village to conduct a competitive analysis of the Elk Grove Village Business Park (the “Business Park”). Our analysis, presented on the following pages, evaluates the competitive advantages of the Business Park in terms of its: 1) Real Estate, Business and Employment Mix 4 2) Access to Transportation Networks and the Movement of Freight 12 3) Access to the Supply Chain, Regional Economy and Labor Market 28 4) Competitive Tax Position 40 5) Access to Technology Networks 46 6) Access to Government Services 52 ELK GROVE VILLAGE BUSINESS PARK COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 1 ELK GROVE VILLAGE BUSINESS PARK IS THE LARGEST CONTIGUOUS INDUSTRIAL PARK IN NORTH AMERICA 64M 3,600 400 SQUARE FEET BUSINESSES MANUFACTURERS OF SPACE Sources: CoStar, Infogroup ELK GROVE VILLAGE BUSINESS PARK COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 2 WISCONSIN DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO O’HARE AIRPORT 25 MILES FROM DOWNTOWN CHICAGO Elk Grove Village Business Park Chicago INDIANA ELK GROVE VILLAGE BUSINESS PARK COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 3 COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: REAL ESTATE, BUSINESS AND EMPLOYMENT MIX The Business Park includes a healthy diversity of real estate offerings and business types, with a strong emphasis on smaller-scale, affordable real estate that accommodates specialty businesses. The manufacturing cluster comprises approximately 20% of Business Park businesses, with particularly strong specialties in metal and paper manufacturing. Of the top 15 manufacturing and distribution industries within the Business Park, all represent a larger share of the local economy as compared to their industry national averages.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Stearns Road Corridor
    Potential Development Area (PDA) #2 I. PDA #2: Stearns Road/Interstate 480 Site Information o 62.05 Acres Total o 73 parcels – parcels are a majority of residential and some commercial o Zoning – please refer to zoning map below Traffic Data – Please refer below for a traffic count map. Accessibility – Stearns Road/Interstate 480 PDA #2 Interstate 480 At site Interstate 80 (Ohio Turnpike) 2.6 miles, 5 minutes Interstate 90 6.0 miles, 14 minutes Interstate 71 7.4 miles, 9 minutes Airports (Cleveland Hopkins International) 7.5 miles, 12 minutes Downtown Cleveland 17.2 miles, 19 minutes Wood Potential Development Area Pheasants Lorain Wellesley ¹ Elmhurst 72 71 1 70 69 4 68 2 3 67 5 66 6 65 64 7 63 8 62 9 10 61 11 60 59 12 58 13 Gareau 57 Sherwood 56 14 ForestRidge 55 15 54 16 53 17 Park Ridge 52 18 51 19 Stearns 50 20 49 21 48 22 47 23 46 24 45 25 44 26 43 27 42 28 41 40 29 Windsor Cambridge 39 30 38 31 33 32 34 Somerset 35 36 Stafford 37 Christman Brighton Surrey I-480 Aspen Tudor Current Zoning of Potential Development Area Berkshire Quail Whitehaven Wood ¹ Pheasants Elmhurst Lorain Wellesley Mc Kenzie Gareau Sherwood ForestRidge Park Ridge Stearns Windsor Cambridge Somerset Stafford Christman Surrey Brighton I-480 Legend Aspen One Family Residential One Family Residential One Family Residential General Retail Business Parcel Data – Stearns Road/I-480 PDA #2 Total Value Property Map ID Parcel Acres Owner Name Address Total Tax Value Total Value BLD LND Class 1 23420004 3.51 Viviani Fam Ltd Part.
    [Show full text]
  • 02-16-16 MINUTES of the 626Th MEETING
    MINUTES OF THE 626th MEETING OF THE OHIO TURNPIKE AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 Chairman: Good morning ladies and gentlemen, it is 10:01 a.m. Would you please rise as we say our Pledge of Allegiance. The Meeting will come to order. Have all guests signed the sign-in sheet in the Lobby? If not, please do so prior to leaving, so we can maintain an accurate record of attendance. Both Senator Manning and Mr. Kauffman advised that they are unable to attend today’s Commission. Will the Assistant Secretary-Treasurer please call the roll? Assistant Secretary-Treasurer: Chairman Hruby Chairman Hruby: Here Assistant Secretary-Treasurer: Commissioner Paradiso Vice Chairman Paradiso: Here Assistant Secretary-Treasurer: Commissioner Barber Secretary-Treasurer Barber: Here Assistant Secretary-Treasurer: Commissioner McAuliffe Mr. McAuliffe: Here Chairman Hruby: Thank you, we have a quorum. Chairman: This is the 626th Meeting of the Ohio Turnpike and Infrastructure Commission. We are meeting here at the Commission’s headquarters, as provided for in the Commission’s Code of Bylaws for a Commission Special Meeting. Various reports will be received, and we will act on several resolutions. Draft copies have previously been sent to the Members and updated drafts are in the Members’ folders. The Resolutions will be explained during the appropriate reports. May I have a motion to adopt the Minutes of the January 19, 2016, Commission Meeting? 14930 MOTION: A motion to adopt the Minutes of the January 19, 2016, Commission Meeting was made by Vice Chairman Paradiso and seconded by Mr. McAuliffe. All Commission Members present voted to approve the Minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Oakwood Village, Ohio
    HAWTHORNE VALLEY GOODMANREALESTATE.COM 216.381.8200 Oakwood Village, Ohio 6,500 SF 99,768 VPD (2017) 1,200 - 3,200 SF FORBES ROAD 1.56 AC UP TO 4,525 SF 2.0 AC 15,434 VPD (2017) BROADWAY AVENUE HIGHLIGHTS DEMOGRAPHICS • AVAILABLE - 1,200 square feet to 6,500 square feet POPULATION 3 MILE 5 MILE 7 MILE 10 MILE 2023 Projection 38,388 128,293 229,750 469,564 • INCOME - 479,000 people with an average household income of $85,000 live within a 10 mile radius 2018 Estimate 39,304 130 ,728 234,036 479,215 • CUSTOMERS - Postioned to capture customers from several of Cleveland’s fastest- INCOME 3 MILE 5 MILE 7 MILE 10 MILE growing residential communities, including Solon, Bainbridge, Twinsburg, Hudson, and 2018 Average $67,092 $73,496 $77,586 $85,007 Macedonia 2018 Median $52,205 $54,574 $54,660 $55,735 • ANCHORS - Sam’s Club, Levin Furniture, The Tile Shop, and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet DAY TIME 3 MILE 5 MILE 7 MILE 10 MILE POPULATION • HIGHWAY ACCESS - Located on Broadway Avenue at the highway interchange of Interstate 271 and Interstate 480; one of the largest and most easily accessible retail 2018 Employees 26,067 87,603 171,502 285,311 centers in southeastern Cleveland STEVE ALTEMARE CLEVELAND THE OFFICES AT LEGACY VILLAGE Senior Vice President LEASING INFORMATION 25333 CEDAR ROAD, SUITE 305 CLEVELAND, OH 44124 [email protected] www.goodmanrealestate.com COLUMBUS CORPORATE HILL II, SUITE 108 ROB YASKANICH 100 W. OLD WILSON BRIDGE ROAD 216.381.8200 COLUMBUS, OH 43085 Senior Director [email protected] THE INFORMATION ABOVE HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM SOURCES BELIEVED TO BE RELIABLE.
    [Show full text]
  • ODOT District 12 2021 Construction Program
    ODOT District 12 2021 Construction Program Lake Geauga Cu GARFIELD HTS. yahoga 12 SERVING CUYAHOGA, GEAUGA AND LAKE COUNTIES Mike DeWine, Ohio Governor | Jack Marchbanks, Ph. D., ODOT Director | John Picuri P.E., District Deputy Director ODOT DISTRICTODOT District12 | 2018 12 CONSTRUCTION 2021 Construction GUIDE Program Table of Contents Overview..................................................................... Page 2 Cuyahoga County....................................................... Pages 3-26 Geauga County........................................................... Pages 27-32 Lake County................................................................ Pages 33-38 Regional Projects....................................................... Pages 39-40 Local-Let Projects........................................................ Page 41-42 LOCAL LET PROJECTS 1 ODOT DISTRICTODOT District12 | 2018 12 CONSTRUCTION 2021 Construction GUIDE Program The Ohio Department of Transportation District 12 is responsible for the maintenance and construction on all Interstates, U.S. Routes, and State Routes in unincorporated municipalities in Cuyahoga, Geauga, and Lake counties. Each spring, we shift our focus from snow and ice removal to the construction and maintenance of our roadways. The 2021 Construction Program includes information about major construction projects in the District 12 tri-county area. For up to date project information and to sign up to receive project-related emails, please visit www.transportation.ohio.gov. To find additional project
    [Show full text]
  • Download Authenticated
    Ohio Administrative Code Rule 4901:2-8-04 Prohibitions. Effective: July 18, 2013 (A) As used in this rule, "northeast Ohio" means the following counties in the state of Ohio: Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain, Medina. (B) As used in this rule, "through transportation" means the transportation of hazardous materials which has neither a place of origin nor a destination in northeast Ohio. (C) The following routes shall be designated routes for the through transportation of hazardous materials in northeast Ohio: (1) Interstate 90 from the Lake/Ashtabula county line to interstate 271 in Lake county. (2) Interstate 80 and interstate 80/90 (Ohio Turnpike) from gate 13 in Portage county to the Lorain/Erie county line. (3) Interstate 271 from interstate 90 in Lake county to interstate 71 in Medina county. (4) Interstate 77 from interstate 80 in Cuyahoga county to interstate 271 in Summit county. (5) Interstate 71 from interstate 80 in Cuyahoga county to Medina/Wayne county line. (6) Interstate 480 from interstate 80, gate 13 in Portage county to interstate 271 in Summit county. (7) Interstate 480 from interstate 480N in Cuyahoga county to interstate 80 in Lorain county. (8) Interstate 480N from interstate 271 to interstate 480 in Cuyahoga county. (D) The following routes shall be restricted routes for the through transportation of hazardous materials in northeast Ohio: Page 1 (1) Interstate 90 from interstate 271 in Lake county to interstate 80/90 in Lorain county. (2) Interstate 71 from interstate 80 to interstate 90 in Cuyahoga county. (3) Interstate 77 from interstate 80 to interstate 90 in Cuyahoga county.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY Interstate 480 / Transportation Boulevard Interchange
    INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY Interstate 480 / Transportation Boulevard Interchange City of Garfield Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio Prepared For: City of Garfield Heights 5407 Turney Road Garfield Heights, OH 44125 & ODOT District 12 5500 Transportation Boulevard Garfield Heights, OH 44125 Prepared By: GPD Group 5595 Transportation Boulevard Suite 100 Cleveland, OH 44125 May 2016 Interchange Operations Study – Interstate 480 / Transportation Boulevard City of Garfield Heights, Ohio TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Purpose: ............................................................................................................................... 1 II. Study Area: ........................................................................................................................... 1 III. Traffic Volumes: ................................................................................................................... 1 ‘No-Build’ Traffic Volumes: ..................................................................................... 1 ‘Build’ Traffic Volumes: ........................................................................................... 2 IV. Alternatives Considered: ....................................................................................................... 2 V. Traffic Analysis: .................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology: .......................................................................................................... 3
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 100/Friday, May 23, 2014/Notices
    29836 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 100 / Friday, May 23, 2014 / Notices Pursuant to section 10(d) of the to the Airport. These intangible benefits boulevard. Those actions grant Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 will offset the value of the released approvals for the project. U.S.C. App 10(d), and 5 U.S.C. property. DATES: A claim seeking judicial review 552b(c)(1), it has been determined that DATES: Comments must be received on of the Federal agency actions on the this Board meeting will be closed to the or before June 23, 2014. highway project will be barred unless public because the Board will be the claim is filed on or before October reviewing and discussing matters ADDRESSES: Comments on this 20, 2014. If this date falls on a Saturday, properly classified in accordance with application may be mailed or delivered Sunday, or legal holiday, parties are Executive Order 13526. The purpose of to the FAA at the following address: advised to file their claim no later than the ISAB is to provide the Department Terry J. Page, Manager, FAA the business day preceding this date. If with a continuing source of Washington Airports District Office, the Federal law that authorizes judicial independent advice on all aspects of 23723 Air Freight Lane, Suite 210, review of a claim provides a time period arms control, disarmament, Dulles, VA 20166. of less than 150 days for filing such nonproliferation, political-military In addition, one copy of any claim, then that shorter time period still affairs, international security, and comments submitted to the FAA must applies.
    [Show full text]