Final Environmental Impact Stabement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Environmental Impact Stabement Final Environmental Impact Stabement for the Nevada Test Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada Volume 1 Appendix I U.S. Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada NEVADA TESTSITE Flh'AL ENV1ROh'ME.NTAL IMPACTSTATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ....................................................................... iv SUMMARY ....................................................................... S- l 1 .O INTRODUCTION ....... ............................. 1. I Purpose and Scope ....... ............................. 1.2 Background Information . ............................. 1.3 Summary of Results . .......................................... 1-6 1.3.1 Defense Pro ................. .................. 1-6 1.3.2 Waste Man ................. ............. 1-6 1.4 Conclusions .................................. .................. 1-1 2.0 PUBLIC ISSUES .... ............................................. 2-1 2. I Public Involvement ......................................... 2-1 2.2 Stakeholder Issues ........................... ........2-7 2.2. I Transportation Management Operations ............. ......... 2-7 2.2.2 Local Segments of Concern ................. .......... 2-8 2.2.3 Routing . ....................... ........... .2-11 2.2.4 Rail Option , , . ................ .2-11 2.2.5 Health Risks .................. 2.2.6 Transportation Protocol Working Gr 2.3 American Indian Issues ................ ...................... 2-16 2.4 Conclusions ......................... ...................... 2-16 3.0 TRANSPORTATION RISK ........... .................... .3-1 3.1 General Information ........... ....................... 3-1 3.2 Defense Programs Transportation ..................... 3.2.1 Defense Programs Transp y and Data ....... 3.2.2 Defense Programs Transportation Risk System Description .............. 3-4 3.2.3 Defense Programs Transportation Risk Results ................... 3.2.4 Defense Programs Transportation Risk Conclusions ............... 3.3 Waste Management Activities Transportation Risk ...................... 3.3.1 Methodology ......... .............................. 3-5 3.3.2 System Description .... ........................ 3-8 3.3.3 Data Values .................. ...................... 3-22 3.3.4 Waste Management Transportation Risk Results and Conclusions ........3-26 3.3.5 Waste Management Transportation Risk Conclusions .................. 3-32 3.4 Hazardous Materials Shipments Transportation Risk .... ...........3-32 3.5 Summary .................. ................. 3-35 4.0 REFERENCES .............................................................. 4-1 I Volume 1, Appendix I .TEVADA TESTSITE FIIVAL E.VC'lROSME,VrAL IMPACT SlATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Attachments A . Applicable Federal. State. and Local Laws and Regulations ...................... A- i B . Proccdures and Regulations Relating to Transportation of Hazardous Materials .......... B- i C . Public Participation in the Transportation Study ................................ ... C- 1 D . Emergency Response Procedures and Training ................................ ... D- i E . Nevada Test Site Rail Access Study ......................................... ... E- 1 F . National Generator Routes ................................................ .... F-l List of Figures Figure 1-1 NTS EIS Transportation Study Waste Generator Locations ................. 1-3 Figure 1-2 NTSMap ........................................................ 1-4 Figure 3-1 National Interstate System ............................................ 3-13 Figure 3-2 NV-I, Eastern Route 7 .............................................. 3-15 Figure 3-3 NV-2, Eastern Route X ............................................... 3-16 Figure 3-4 NV-3, Northern Route 5 ............................................. 3-17 Figure 3-5 NV-4, Eastern Route 9 .............................................. 3-18 Figure 3-6 NV-8, Eastern Route 10 ............ ........................... 3-19 Figure 3-7 NV-6, Southern Route 6 ........ ................ ...... 3-20 Figure 3-8 NV-7, Southern Koute 8 ............... ........................ 3-21 Figure 3-9 NV-8, Southern Route 1 ............... ........................ 3-23 Figure 3-10 NV-9, Southern Route 2 ............................................ 3-24 Figure 3- I 1 NV- 10, Southern Route 5 .............. ......................... 3-28 Figure 3-12 Nevada In-State Traffic Fatality Risk .... ......................... 3-28 Figure 3-13 Nevada In-State Traffic Injury Risk. .... ............... .. 3-28 Figure 3-14 Nevada In-State Incident-Free Radiation-Induced Cancer Fatality Risk ........ 3-29 Figure 3-15 Nevada In-State Radiation-Induced Cancer Fatality Risk Due to Accidents ..... 3-29 Figure 3- I6 Nevada In-State Incident-Free Radiation Induced Detriment Risk ............ 3-30 Figure 3- I7 Nevada In-State Radiation-Induced Detriment Risk Due to Accidents . .... 3-30 Figure 3- I8 Nevada In-State Chemical-Induced Cancer Risk ....... ................ 3-31 Figure 3-19 Nevada In-State Chemical-Induced Noncancer Hazard Index . ....... 3-31 List of Tables Table 2- I Transportation meetings held on the NTS EIS Transportation Study .......... .2-2 Table 2-2 Results of Transportation Protocol Working Group Issue Ranking .............. .2-8 Table 3-1 Defense Programs Transportation Risk for Alternative 1 .................... ... 3-6 Table 3-2 Defense Programs Transportation Risk for Alternative 3 .................... .... 3-6 Table 3-3 Comparison of Defense Programs Transportation Risk Between Alternative I and Alternative 3 ........................................ ... 3-6 Table 3-4 Low-Level Waste and Mixed Waste Volumes and Shipments for Alternative ... 3-10 Table 3-5 Low-Level Waste Volumes and Shipments for Alternative 1 ................ 3-11 Table 3-6 Mixed Waste Volume and Shipments for Alternative 3 .................... 3-12 Volume 1. Appendix I II ~ ~~ .VEVAD.4 TEs1'SITE FI!VAL EA'VlRO.VME.VTAL Mf'ACT~YL4TEVEVI TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) List of Tables (cnntinued) Table 3-7 Expected Number of Occurrences in 10 years (National Route) ................3-32 Table 3-8 Expected Number of Occurrences in 10 years (within Nevada) .................3-32 Table 3-9 On-site Transportation Risk for NTS-Generated Waste ....................... 3-34 111 Volurnc I. Appendix I ~ ~~ ~ A l/SSl Armored TrdctoriSafe-Secure 'Trailer ac acres ADROIT Potential risk associated with Defense Programs Transportation Activities ANL-t Argonne National Laboratory - East BAPL Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory Bq Becquerel CGTO Consolidated Group of 'I'rihes and Organizations dBa a weighted decibel DoD IJ.S. Department of Defense VOE U.S. Department of I-hcrgy DOEINV 1J.S. Department of Energy, Nevada Operations Office EIS Environmental Impact Statement EM Einergxicy Materials EI'A U. S. Env i r~ntnentalProtect ion Agency FEMP ternald Environmental Management Project FORTRAN A computer programming language for problems that can he addressed in algebraic terms g gram Hr hertz HIGH WAY A computer program used for evaluating routes for transporting hazardous inaterials in the United States hoursikr hours per year INEI. Idaho National Engineering Laboratory KAPL Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory km kilometer LANI, Los Alnmos National Laboratory LCF Latent cancer fatality LLNL I.awrence I .ivermore National Laboratory LLW Low-Level Waste m2 square meters ni3 cubic meters ERPG Emergency response planning guidelines in meter mi mile Yd yard NAFR Complex Nellis Air Force Range Volume 1, Appendix I I" ~ ~_____ ACRONYMS (continued) nCi llanocurie NTS Nevada Test Site PSC Public Service Commission ORNL Oak Ridge National Laboratory PEIS Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement PORTS Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant RFETS Rocky Flats Environmental Technology Site SLAC Stanford Linear Accelerator Spaghetti Bowl US. 15/95 Interchange in Las Vegas SRS Savannah River Site RADTRAN A computer code combining user-determined meteorological, demographic, transportation, packaging, and material factors with health physics data to calculate the expected radiological consequences and accident risk of transporting radioactive materials voc Volatile Organic Compound Y Volume I, Appendix I ~- This Page Intentionally Left Blank Volume I. Appcndix I \I ~~ This report has been prepared to address local people who reside along three of the primary transportation issues concerning current and routes previously evaluated for risk in the NTS potential operations at the Nevada Test Site (NTS), EIS. The DOE is committed to having the study to document the results of the NTS transportation reflect the full range of American Indian options. risk analysis, and to provide information and supporting documentation for the Environmental As part of its mission related to Defense Program, Impact Statement (EIS) for the NTS and Off-Site the DOE maintains and operates a special fleet of Locations in the State ofNevada. Four alternatives trucks and trailers used to transport Category I1 or are evaluated in the NTS EIS: Alternative I, higher nuclear material between Department of Continue Current Operations, (No Action); Defense (DoD) and DOE sites in a safe and secure Alternative 2, Discontinue Operations; Alternative manner. The DOEiAlbuquerque Operations 3, Expanded Use; and Alternative 4, Alternate Use Office, Transportation Safeguards Division is of Withdrawn Lands. The transportation risk responsible for the operation and maintenance of analysis estimated the health risk from highway these safe-secure trailers and support
Recommended publications
  • Gilman Industrial Park Brochure
    Illinois Gilman has an available 265 acre park waiting for you! o'Crossroadsof Opportunity" Location-Location-Location This 265 acre industrial park 90 miles south of Chicago is ideally located at the intersections of Interstate 57 US 24 and US 45. It is also bordered by the main lines for the TP&W (SantaFe) and Illinois Cenfal (CN) Railroads. The infrasffucture available is extensive. The property can be divided into lots to suit individual usersneeds. Shawn Coady Rick Theesfeld 204 N. Rt s4lP.O.Box98 215N. Central RobertsoIllinois 60962 Gilman, Illinois 60938 217-395-2281, 8t5-265-42t3 217-395-2572(Bax) 815-265-4640(Fax) INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE OR SCHEDULED/SPRING 2OO4 COMPLETED . 400,000 gallon vertical water storagetank on . Site Survey site . Topographicalmaps . Looped 12" x S" watermains in park . Illinois historical survey . 8" municipal sanitary sewer system . PhaseI Environmental . Two electrical serviceproviders with . Wetlands survey extensiveinfrastructure availablein the park . Drainage plans . 138 KV overhead . 69 KV overhead ECONOMIC INCENTIVES . 12 KV overhead . Substationlocated in the park Tax Increment Finance District Iroquois DevelopmentCouncil 8" natural gas service Local city incentives City streetaccess to the park 3 lane,concrete,40 foot curb and gutter RAIL SERVICE Lishted streetentrance . Illinois Central (CN) main line . Illinois Central (CN) Springfield line INTERSTATEACCESS . TP&W (SantaFe) , I-57,US-24, US-45 border the site . Switching yard in Gilman ELECTRIC WASTEWATER WATER AverageLoad Supplier 250,000gallons per Ameren CIPS day City of Gilman . 13,700MW Generation Design Capacity Source Capacity 500,000gallons per day 2DeepWells . Multiple interconnections Tlpe of Plant . ElevatedStorage Capacity Substationon site Primary .
    [Show full text]
  • Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx
    Top 10 Most Traveled U.S. Structurally Deficient Bridges by State, 2015 2015 Year Daily State State County Type of Bridge Location Status in 2014 Status in 2013 Built Crossings Rank 1 Alabama Jefferson 1970 136,580 Urban Interstate I65 over U.S.11,RR&City Streets at I65 2nd Ave. to 2nd Ave.No Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 2 Alabama Mobile 1964 87,610 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Halls Mill Creek at 2.2 mi E US 90 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 3 Alabama Jefferson 1972 77,385 Urban Interstate I-59/20 over US 31,RRs&City Streets at Bham Civic Center Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 4 Alabama Mobile 1966 73,630 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Southern Drain Canal at 3.3 mi E Jct SR 163 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 5 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over D Olive Stream at 1.5 mi E Jct US 90 & I-10 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 6 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over Joe S Branch at 0.2 mi E US 90 Not Deficient Not Deficient 7 Alabama Jefferson 1968 41,990 Urban Interstate I 59/20 over Arron Aronov Drive at I 59 & Arron Aronov Dr. Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 8 Alabama Mobile 1964 41,490 Rural Interstate I-10 over Warren Creek at 3.2 mi E Miss St Line Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 9 Alabama Jefferson 1936 39,620 Urban other principal arterial US 78 over Village Ck & Frisco RR at US 78 & Village Creek Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 10 Alabama Mobile 1967 37,980 Urban Interstate
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide
    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Redevelopment Agency of the City of Oakland Broadway/Macarthur/San Pablo Project Tax Allocation Bonds, Series
    NEW ISSUE-BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: Moody’s: Aaa (Baa2 underlying) S&P: AAA (BBB+ underlying) (See “Ratings” herein) In the opinion of Jones Hall, A Professional Law Corporation, San Francisco, Bond Counsel, subject, however to certain qualifications, under existing law, the interest on the Series 2006C-TE Bonds is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes and such interest is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations, although for the purpose of computing the alternative minimum tax imposed on certain corporations, such interest is taken into account in determining certain income and earnings. In the further opinion of Bond Counsel, interest on the Series 2006C-TE Bonds and the Series 2006C-T Bonds is exempt from California personal income taxes. Interest on the Series 2006C-T Bonds is subject to all applicable federal income taxation. See “TAX MATTERS” herein. $4,945,000 $12,325,000 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF OAKLAND CITY OF OAKLAND BROADWAY/MACARTHUR/ SAN PABLO BROADWAY/MACARTHUR/ SAN PABLO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT TAX ALLOCATION BONDS TAX ALLOCATION BONDS SERIES 2006C-TE SERIES 2006C-T (FEDERALLY TAXABLE) Dated: Date of Delivery Due: September 1, as shown on inside cover page This cover page contains certain information for quick reference only. It is not a summary of this issue. Investors are advised to read the entire Official Statement to obtain information essential to the making
    [Show full text]
  • I-24 SMART CORRIDOR Leveraging Technology to Improve Safety and Mobility
    I-24 SMART CORRIDOR Leveraging Technology to Improve Safety and Mobility Brad Freeze, Director, Traffic Operations Division, TDOT The Need • Interstate 24 (I-24) is a integral part of the Nashville transportation network and a major route for commuters and freight. • Traffic volumes along the I-24 corridor have experienced exponential growth rates over the past decade. Since 2005, traffic volumes have increased more than 60% on I-24 near Murfreesboro. • Currently, peak hour volumes exceed capacity and even a minor incident can have a severe impact on travel time reliability. • Due to physical, environmental, and financial constraints along the Corridor there are no viable, short term roadway widening projects. Area Map I-24 Congestion Contributors Traffic Incidents 27% Incidents Breakdown 2015 Contributors to Congestion (Total Crashes:1,661) Crash History & Analysis I-24 Section Crash Rate Crash Rate Data represents information collected between 2013-2015 System Performance Review AM Peak Period Travel Time I-24 From I-840 to Briley Pkwy. 85 High Variability 75 65 55 Travel Time 95th Percentile 45 Average Travel Time Travel Time (min) Time Travel 35 25 15 Reliability From Exit 78 (SR-96) & Exit 53 (I-440 Interchange), 25 miles Westbound Travel (Weekdays 2014-2016) Buffer time (minutes) Planning time (minutes) Travel time (minutes) 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 39.64 3.59 69.32 30.14 36 27.94 43.98 4.48 73.64 31.04 37.3 27.57 43.57 4.63 73.22 31.18 37.59 27.32 Eastbound Travel (Weekdays 2014-2016) Buffer time (minutes) Planning time (minutes) Travel time (minutes) 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 5:00 AM - 9:00 AM 3:00 PM - 7:00 PM 2.76 19.18 27.22 45.71 24.93 30.63 2.86 22.16 27.31 48.69 24.97 32.53 1.97 25.85 26.43 52.38 24.46 33.92 2014 User Costs 2015 2016 Previous Studies I-24 Multimodal Corridor Study • Identified short- and long-term solutions for improving problem spots along the entire corridor.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Cleveland Operations
    Directions to Cleveland Works 1600 Harvard Avenue Cleveland, OH 44105 Please note that there are no sleeping areas at this facility. You must stop at a rest area or truck stop. From Interstate 71 th North bound: Take 1-71 North to Exit 247A, W. 14 St. and Clark Ave. Make a right at the end of the exit ramp. nd Then take route 176 south, approx. ¼ mile on your left. Harvard Ave. will be your 2 exit. At the end of the rd ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be at the 3 traffic light on your right. ¾ Closest Rest Area Exit 209, Lodi From Interstate 77 North bound: Take 1-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave). At the end of the ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be about 1 mile on your left. ¾ Closest Rest Area Exit 111, North Canton From Interstate 80 East East or West bound: Exit 11 / 173 to I-77 North. Take I-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave). At the end of the ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be about 1 mile on your left. ¾ Closest Rest Area East Bound between exits 10 / 161 and 11 / 173 West Bound between exits 14 / 209 and 13A / 193 From Interstate 480 East bound: Exit 17 onto Route 176 North. Exit onto Harvard Ave. Take a right onto Harvard Ave. Gate 6 will rd be at the 3 traffic light on your right. ¾ Closest Rest Area None West bound: Exit 20B onto I-77 North. Take 1-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave).
    [Show full text]
  • City of Cleveland Location in the NOACA Region
    CITY OF C LEVEL AND T HE C ITY OF C LEVELAND R OADWAY P AVEMENT M AINTENANCE R EPORT T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 2. Background ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3. PART I: 2016 Pavement Condition ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 4. PART II: 2018 Current Backlog ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 5. PART III: Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) Program ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Provides Information on EGC ESP Site Location, On-Site
    CHAPTER 2 Site Characteristics This chapter provides information on the EGC ESP Site location, on-site activities and controls, present and projected population distribution, meteorological, hydrological, geological, and seismological characteristics. The purpose of presenting this information is to provide the bases for demonstrating the adequacy of the site characteristics from a site safety viewpoint and to provide input to support environmental characterization. The influence of the EGC ESP site characteristics on the design and operation of a possible future nuclear power facility will be assessed at the construction and operating license (COL) stage pursuant to 10 CFR 52 Subpart C. REV2 2-1 CHAPTER 2 - SITE CHARACTERISTICS SITE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FOR EGC EARLY SITE PERMIT SECTION 2.1 – GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY 2.1 Geography and Demography 2.1.1 Site Location and Description 2.1.1.1 Specification of Location The EGC ESP Facility will be co-located on the property of the existing CPS Facility and its associated 4,895 ac man-made cooling reservoir (Clinton Lake) (CPS, 2002). The EGC ESP Facility will be located approximately 700 ft south of the existing CPS Facility. The CPS Facility lies within Zone 16 of the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates. The exact UTM coordinates for the EGC ESP Facility will depend upon the specific reactor technology selected for deployment and will be finalized at COL. As shown on Figures 1.2-1 and 2.1-1 there is a complex transportation system surrounding the EGC ESP Site. The nearest major highways are Illinois State Routes 54, 10, and 48, all of which cross the CPS Facility property.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions from Meadowood to Sacramento Airport Daly City
    Directions to Meadowood Directions to Meadowood Directions to Meadowood Middletown Directions to Meadowood Directions to Meadowood from San Francisco International from San Francisco International from San Francisco International from Sacramento Airport from Oakland Airport Geyserville Airport via the Golden Gate Bridge Airport via the Golden Gate Bridge Airport via the Bay Bridge Take Interstate 5 south approximately 5 miles. Take From Oakland Airport, follow all signs to Interstate 880 and Santa Rosa Calistoga the Interstate 80 exit toward San Francisco, west. north. Continue on Interstate 880 north for 8 miles Take Highway 101 north staying to the left at fork. Travel 1 Take Highway 101 north, (staying to the right) toward St. Helena Winters Continue on Interstate 80 through Fairfield. Take the to Interstate 80 east. Take Interstate 80 east toward mile taking Interstate 380 west toward Interstate 280 (San San Francisco. Travel 6 miles. Highway 101 then merges Highway 12 exit toward Napa. Continue on Highway 12 Berkeley/Vallejo/Sacramento for approximately 25 miles, Take Highway 101 north staying left at the fork. Travel 1 mile Santa Rosa Bruno). Travel 1 mile then take I-280 north toward San into Interstate 80. Follow signs to Bay Bridge/Oakland. Rutherford To approximately 6 miles to Highway 29. Turn right following all signs to Vallejo. You will cross the Carquinez Francisco. Take Highway 1 toward 19th Ave./Golden Gate taking Interstate 380 west toward Interstate 280 (San Bruno). Cross Bay Bridge and stay in left lanes following signs to Sacramento (north), and continue 25 miles through the towns of Bridge, where you will need to pay a $5 toll.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Instructions 1
    Travel Instructions 1 to the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Getting to Campus by Car: We look forward to welcoming you to our campus. The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is located in the heart of the US; an easy drive from Chicago, St. Louis From the north on Interstate 57: and Indianapolis; and readily accessible by air, rail, and bus. • Drive south on I-57 to I-74. • Drive east on I-74 to the Lincoln Avenue exit. • Take the Lincoln Avenue exit south. Chicago • Drive 1.7 miles until you get to the corner of Lincoln and Green Street. • Turn right on Green Street. Illinois I-57 I-74 From the south on Interstate 57: Urbana- Champaign • Drive north on I-57 to exit 235, the junction with I-72. As you arrive in Champaign, I-72 becomes University Avenue. • Follow University Avenue east through Champaign, into I-74 Urbana, to Lincoln Avenue (about 3.5 miles). Springfield I-72 • Turn right (south) and go six blocks until you get to the Indianapolis corner of Lincoln Avenue and Green Street. I-55 • Turn right on Green Street. I-70 I-70 From the south, and WIllard Airport, on US Route 45: • Drive north on Route 45 (if leaving Willard Airport, turn left off I-57 Airport Road onto Route 45), through the town of Savoy, to Kirby St. Louis Avenue in Champaign. (Route 45 becomes Neil Street.) • Turn right on Kirby Avenue and drive east into Urbana (Kirby becomes Florida Avenue) to Lincoln Avenue (traffic light).
    [Show full text]
  • 1963 1963 the the of of of of Description Description
    e y ~ 'rte ~ 4 ~ ~~~. ~ ~ ~L +i's 's' ~ *" a~t,y'" J ^ ,..,T+s d az' ~ 8a•. ~r ~ ~Y. r~ ,~ } ~„ ~"' y s'~ ~- ~- N ~, 4 r ~ ts~ 0 ~ i~° e~ ~" t ~ y ~ _ ~ ~ y ^: *} ~ }t. ~ `/ ~ 6~ Y ~p S d~Y R" vW # ' `i ti r n' ke~s ~ J ~ ~ ~~ +3 ~ y t ~r x. t' ~ ~~ ~i _ ~.~y ~g x ,. 9~ :~ ~ x aaa+ra.. "' ~$ .;~w~.v 'Y~1se~n ~+~.~-*a fir;.: ~. ,... §~~`" u, a ., .. ~.: w Letters of Transmittal December 9, 1963 December 9, 1963 JOHN ERRECA EDMUND G. BROWN Director of Public Works Governor of California State of California My dear Governor: Dear Sir: The 17th Annual Report of the Division of Highways, Depart- In compliance with Section 143 of the Streets and Highways ment of Public Works, which I am pleased to submit to you, Code, the 17th Annual Report of the Division of Highways for presents a broad picture of the state highway program during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1963, is submitted herewith fiscal year 1962-63. It describes the steady progress in planning for your approval and transmittal to Governor Edmund G. and constructing today for tomorrow's transportation needs, as Brown. well as the activities of the division's various units. The report contains information on the construction program Your attention is invited to the comments contained in the through the end of 1963 and a description of the projects in enclosed letter of transmittal from the State Highway Engineer the budget for fiscal year 1964-65 which the California High- regarding progress on the interstate system and on the network way Commission adopted in October.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Suspended Where Possible for July 4
    State of Illinois JB Pritzker, Governor Illinois Department of Transportation Omer Osman, Acting Secretary FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: CONTACT: July 1, 2020 Paul Wappel 217.685.0082 Maria Castaneda 312.447.1919 Construction suspended where possible for July 4 Non-emergency closures called off, but motorists should still expect work zones SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois Department of Transportation announced today that lanes that have been closed for construction will reopen, where possible, for the Fourth of July holiday to minimize travel disruption. Non-emergency closures will be suspended from 3 p.m. July 2 to 11:59 p.m. July 5. The following lane closures will remain in place during the holiday weekend. Work zone speed limits will remain in effect where posted. Please buckle up, put your phone down and drive sober. District 1 City of Chicago: • The following ramps in the Jane Byrne Interchange work zone will remain closed: • o Inbound Kennedy (Interstate 90/94) Expressway exit to inbound Ida B. Wells Drive. o Outbound Dan Ryan Expressway exit to Taylor Street and Roosevelt Road. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive entrance from Canal Street. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive exit to outbound Dan Ryan. o Outbound Ida B. Wells Drive exit to outbound Kennedy. o Inbound Eisenhower Expressway (Interstate -290) to outbound Kennedy; detour with U-turn posted. o Inbound Eisenhower; lane reductions continue. o Inbound Ida B. Wells Drive; lane reductions continue. • Outbound Kennedy exit at Canfield Road; closed. • Westbound Bryn Mawr Avenue between Harlem and Oriole avenues; lane reductions continue. • Westbound Higgins Avenue between Oriole and Canfield avenues; lane reductions continue.
    [Show full text]