DOCSLIB.ORG

Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ............................................................ 106 Connecticut ................................................................ 26 South Carolina ......................................................... 107 Delaware ..................................................................... 27 South Dakota ........................................................... 109 Florida ......................................................................... 28 Tennessee .................................................................. 111 Georgia ....................................................................... 31 Texas .......................................................................... 113 Hawaii ......................................................................... 34 Utah ........................................................................... 118 Idaho ........................................................................... 35 Vermont .................................................................... 121 Illinois ......................................................................... 40 Virginia ..................................................................... 122 Indiana ........................................................................ 44 Washington .............................................................. 125 Iowa ............................................................................. 48 West Virginia ........................................................... 129 Kansas ......................................................................... 51 Wisconsin ................................................................. 131 Kentucky ..................................................................... 54 Wyoming .................................................................. 136 Louisiana .................................................................... 56 Maine .......................................................................... 59 Maryland .................................................................... 60 Massachusetts ............................................................ 61 Michigan ..................................................................... 63 Minnesota ................................................................... 66 Mississippi .................................................................. 71 Missouri ...................................................................... 74 Montana ...................................................................... 77 Nebraska ..................................................................... 80 Nevada ........................................................................ 82 New Hampshire ......................................................... 84 New Jersey .................................................................. 86 Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 3 Introduction This guide has been produced to assist you in locating RV Dump Stations across the United States. This page gives you some helpful instructions for using it. All dump stations are listed by state. Those located along interstate highways are noted first and then you will find others listed in descending order. Interstates are indentified by their highway number from smallest to largest. All other dump stations are listed by city or town in alphabetic order. Dump Stations On Interstates Dump station found on interstates are listed in chart form (an example is below). Depending on what direction you are traveling, you can view the chart up or down. When driving from the East or the North, view up the chart. Of course you will read the chart downward when traveling from the South or the West. In the sample on the right, you will notice exit #s are listed in bold. The "description" column shows the city, town, street, or highway listed from the exit. Underneath the exit you will notice a list for each site Interstate Highway that has a dump station. The description includes truck stops, gas station, travel centers and county An overview of the interstate highway is listed here. parks and other sites as listed It will tell you how long the interstate is and also the common traveling direction. Sometimes you will see a location like a rest area or a welcome center which may be listed along an interstate not an exit. These are described by the mile Exit(mm) Description marker number in (parentheses). Often you will notice (22) Welcome Center (wb) a symbol like (nb), (eb), (wb), (sb) after the name. 67 CR 89 This indicates the area is can only be entered by those Pilot Travel Center traveling northbound, eastbound, westbound, or 87 AR 59 / Springdale southbound. Econ Family Center Finding Other Dump Stations Love’s Travel Stop Dump stations which are not found on interstates will be listed in this area. You will see the sites are listed in alpha numeric order by city and town. A Word About Mile Markers & Exit Numbers Mile markers or mile posts are the little green signs you see on the side of highways which are placed at all 1 mile sections. Mile markers are posted on the most southern or western point in any given state. Here's an example: If you are traveling into Colorado from the state of New Mexico, you will see that the mile marker numbers increase as you begin travel from the North through Colorado. On the other hand, if you were to enter into Colorado from Utah, you will notice the numbers increase as you head east through Colorado. The only state which does not have mile markers is California. They use a post mile system with numbering beginning and stopping at county lines. There are two different methods used to determine interstate exit numbers. The most common is based on the mile marker system. This means that the first exit number on an interstate as you travel south to north or west to east is determined by the distance measured from the state line. An example would be if an exit were to be located between mile marker 4 and 5, it would be marked as Exit 4. The very next exit, if it were located at marker 8.7, would be marked as Exit 8. This lets you know you must travel about 4 miles to come to the next exit. This method is particularly helpful in determining the location and distance needed to travel to a desired exit. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 4 Yet the second method used in numbering interstate exits is known as the "consecutive numbering system. This means the interstate exit numbers begin at the most southern or western point and will increase consecutively as you head north or east. With this method, the first exit as you drive south to north or east to west will be Exit 1. Subsequent exits will be Exit 2, Exit 3 and on and on. There are only a few states incorporating the "consecutive numbering" system. California is changing their mile market system. The exit numbers and mile markers they now use are listed in this guide and are based on the new numbering system used by the state of California. Abbreviations Used Below you will find the different abbreviations used in this guide. Abbreviation Description Blvd .................... Boulevard CR ...................... County Road E ......................... East eb ....................... Eastbound FM ..................... Farm to Market Road Hwy ................... Highway I .......................... Interstate N ........................ North nb ....................... Northbound NRA .................. National Recreation Area Pkwy .................. Parkway Rd ...................... Road S ......................... South sb ........................ Southbound US ...................... U.S. Highway W ....................... West wb ...................... Westbound Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 5 Alabama Listed below are dump station in the state of Alabama starting with those available along interstate highways and then other locations found throughout the state. Interstate 10 I10 runs east/west for 67
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx
    Top 10 Most Traveled U.S. Structurally Deficient Bridges by State, 2015 2015 Year Daily State State County Type of Bridge Location Status in 2014 Status in 2013 Built Crossings Rank 1 Alabama Jefferson 1970 136,580 Urban Interstate I65 over U.S.11,RR&City Streets at I65 2nd Ave. to 2nd Ave.No Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 2 Alabama Mobile 1964 87,610 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Halls Mill Creek at 2.2 mi E US 90 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 3 Alabama Jefferson 1972 77,385 Urban Interstate I-59/20 over US 31,RRs&City Streets at Bham Civic Center Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 4 Alabama Mobile 1966 73,630 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Southern Drain Canal at 3.3 mi E Jct SR 163 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 5 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over D Olive Stream at 1.5 mi E Jct US 90 & I-10 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 6 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over Joe S Branch at 0.2 mi E US 90 Not Deficient Not Deficient 7 Alabama Jefferson 1968 41,990 Urban Interstate I 59/20 over Arron Aronov Drive at I 59 & Arron Aronov Dr. Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 8 Alabama Mobile 1964 41,490 Rural Interstate I-10 over Warren Creek at 3.2 mi E Miss St Line Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 9 Alabama Jefferson 1936 39,620 Urban other principal arterial US 78 over Village Ck & Frisco RR at US 78 & Village Creek Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 10 Alabama Mobile 1967 37,980 Urban Interstate
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040
    Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040 4.1 Roads and Highways Element The largest part of the transportation system is a roadway network of more than 7,000 lane miles and is comprised of NCDOT maintained roads, locally maintained roads, and private roads. In late 2013 the metropolitan area boundary for the High Point MPO increased in size to include the remaining portion of Davidson County not already included in an MPO. This substantially expanded the roadway network for the MPO. Radial movements that are strongest in the MPO are: • Towards Greensboro and Jamestown to the northeast, • Towards Winston-Salem from High Point to the northwest via Interstate 74, • Towards the Piedmont Triad International Airport to the north via NC 68, • Towards Lexington from High Point to the southwest via Interstate 85 and US 29/70, and • Towards Winston-Salem from Lexington via US 52. • There is some radial demand between High Point, Thomasville, Archdale, Trinity, and Wallburg. Heavily traveled routes include: • Eastchester Drive (NC 68), towards Piedmont Triad International Airport • Westchester Drive and National Highway (NC 68), towards Thomasville • NC 109 • Main Street in High Point, • Main Street in Archdale, • US 311 Bypass, • Interstate 85, • US 29-70, • Wendover Avenue, • Main Street and NC 8 in and around Lexington, • High Point - Greensboro Road, and 4.1 Roads and Highways Element • Surrett Drive. Chapter: 1 Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) 2040 The projects in the Roadway Element of the Transportation Plan come from the Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) for the High Point Urbanized Area. The differences between the Roadway Element of the MTP and the CTP include: • The MTP is required by Federal Law, CTP is mandated by the North Carolina Department of Transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation
    visionHagerstown 2035 5 | Transportation Transportation Introduction An adequate vehicular circulation system is vital for Hagerstown to remain a desirable place to live, work, and visit. Road projects that add highway capacity and new road links will be necessary to meet the Comprehensive Plan’s goals for growth management, economic development, and the downtown. This chapter addresses the City of Hagerstown’s existing transportation system and establishes priorities for improvements to roads, transit, and pedestrian and bicycle facilities over the next 20 years. Goals 1. The city’s transportation network, including roads, transit, and bicycle and pedestrian facilities, will meet the mobility needs of its residents, businesses, and visitors of all ages, abilities, and socioeconomic backgrounds. 2. Transportation projects will support the City’s growth management goals. 3. Long-distance traffic will use major highways to travel around Hagerstown rather than through the city. Issues Addressed by this Element 1. Hagerstown’s transportation network needs to be enhanced to maintain safe and efficient flow of people and goods in and around the city. 2. Hagerstown’s network of major roads is generally complete, with many missing or partially complete segments in the Medium-Range Growth Area. 3. Without upgrades, the existing road network will not be sufficient to accommodate future traffic in and around Hagerstown. 4. Hagerstown’s transportation network needs more alternatives to the automobile, including transit and bicycle facilities and pedestrian opportunities. Existing Transportation Network Known as “Hub City,” Hagerstown has long served as a transportation center, first as a waypoint on the National Road—America’s first Dual Highway (US Route 40) federally funded highway—and later as a railway node.
    [Show full text]
  • Gregor Weichbrodt on the Road 0X0a
    0x0a On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt On the Road Gregor Weichbrodt 0x0a © 2014 Gregor Weichbrodt All rights reserved. www.ggor.de CONTENTS About this book ........................ 5 Chapter 1 ............................... 7 Chapter 2 .............................. 23 Chapter 3 .............................. 41 Chapter 4 .............................. 53 ABOUT THIS BOOK Based on the novel “On the Road” by Jack Kerouac and Google Maps Direction Service. The exact and approximate spots Kerouac traveled and described are taken from the book and parsed by Google Direction Service API. The chapters match those of the original book. Gregor Weichbrodt January 2014 www.ggor.de 7 CHAPTER 1 Head northwest on W 47th St toward 7th Ave. Take the 1st left onto 7th Ave. Turn right onto W 39th St. Take the ramp onto Lincoln Tunnel. Parts of this road are closed Mon–Fri 4:00 – 7:00 pm. Entering New Jersey. Continue onto NJ-495 W. Keep right to continue on NJ-3 W, follow signs for New Jersey 3 W/Garden State Parkway/Secaucus. Take the New Jersey 3 W exit on the left toward Clifton. Merge onto NJ-3 W. Slight right onto the Garden State Pkwy N ramp. Merge onto Garden State Pkwy. Take exit 155P on the left to merge onto NJ-19 N toward I-80/ Paterson. Turn left onto Cianci St. Turn right onto Market St. Head west on Market St toward Washington St. Turn left onto Main St. Turn right onto County Rd 509 S. Take the Interstate 80 E ramp. Merge onto I-80 E. Take exit 62A-62B toward Saddle 9 Brook/Saddle River Rd/Garden State Pkwy.
    [Show full text]
  • Prestressed Concrete Girders Achieve Record Lengths Tacoma, Washington
    THE CONCRETE BRIDGE MAGAZINE FALL 2019 www.aspirebridge.org WSDOT inspects 223-ft-long, 247-kip lightweight concrete girder Prestressed Concrete Girders Achieve Record Lengths Tacoma, Washington BRIDGES OF THE FOOTHILLS PARKWAY Great Smoky Mountains National Park DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER VETERANS MEMORIAL BRIDGE Anderson, Indiana MARC BASNIGHT BRIDGE Dare County, North Carolina COURTLAND STREET BRIDGE Atlanta, Georgia Permit No. 567 No. Permit Lebanon Junction, KY Junction, Lebanon Postage Paid Postage Presorted Standard Presorted OVER NEW I-35W BRIDGE I-91 BRATTLEBORO BRIDGE MINNESOTA 40 VERMONT YEARS PENOBSCOT NARROWS BRIDGE & OBSERVATORY HONOLULU RAIL TRANSIT PROJECT MAINE HAWAII 4TH STREET BRIDGE COLORADO AIRTRAIN JFK 410 NEW YORK SARAH MILDRED LONG BRIDGE MAINE/NEW HAMPSHIRE AWARDS FOR OUR CUSTOMERS ACROSS THE UNITED STATES I-280 VETERANS’ GLASS CITY SKYWAY VICTORY BRIDGE OHIO NEW JERSEY DAUPHIN ISLAND BRIDGE ALABAMA FOUR BEARS BRIDGE Creating Bridges As Art® NORTH DAKOTA www.figgbridge.com | 1 800 358 3444 NEW WINONA BRIDGE MINNESOTA VETERANS MEMORIAL BRIDGE TEXAS US 191 COLORADO RIVER BRIDGE I-76 ALLEGHENY RIVER BRIDGE UTAH PENNSYLVANIA I-275 SUNSHINE SKYWAY BRIDGE BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY VIADUCT FLORIDA NORTH CAROLINA SENATOR WILLIAM V. ROTH, JR. BRIDGE NATCHEZ TRACE PARKWAY ARCHES SOUTH NORFOLK JORDAN BRIDGE DELAWARE TENNESSEE VIRGINIA CONTENTS Features “A Shot in the Arm” 6 Armeni Consulting Services helps many clients address 10 estimating and scheduling challenges as the array of delivery and construction methods grows. Bridges of the Foothills Parkway 10 Dwight D. Eisenhower Veterans Memorial Bridge 14 Marc Basnight Bridge 18 Courtland Street Bridge 24 Departments Photo: Eastern Federal Lands Highway Division of the Federal Highway Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions from Faith Heritage to Common Athletic Venues
    Directions from Faith Heritage to Common Athletic Venues Following are directions from the school to common opponent athletic venues. Not every away site will be listed, but the following list will cover almost all regular season games. Directions to Baldwinsville 29 East Oneida Street, B’ville 81 North to 690 West to Van Buren Road exit. Turn right on Van Buren, go about 1 mile and turn left on Route 48. Go through the 4 corners and turn right onto Oneida Street. The entrance to the B’ville campus is just ahead on the left. _____________________________________________________________ Directions to Bishop Grimes 6653 Kirkville Road, East Syracuse 481 North to Kirkville Road exit. Take Kirkville Road West and go through the first intersection. Bishop Grimes is immediately past the intersection on the right. Enter the gym from the parking lot behind the school. Fields are behind the school. ________________________________________________________________________ Directions to Bishop Ludden 815 Fay Road, Syracuse Route 173 West (West Seneca Turnpike) up Onondaga Hill. Stay on 173 at the top of the hill. 2.7 Miles, take right hand fork onto Fay Road (at split Rock-near Immanuel Nazarene Church). 1 Mile to Bishop Ludden. ________________________________________________________________________ Directions to Blessed Virgin Mary (BVM) 2656 Warners Road, Warners, NY 81 North to 690 West to the Camillus bypass (Route 695, which turns into Route 5), just past the state fairgrounds. Take the exit for Newport Road. Turn right onto Newport. Go about 3 miles on Newport (this will include a right hand turn – stay on Newport – at about 2 miles). Turn right on Warners Road/Route 173.
    [Show full text]
  • Interchange Modification Report
    I-26 / Naval Base Terminal Access Road Interchange INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION REPORT CHARLESTON COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA Prepared for: South Carolina Department of Transportation Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. May 2012 I-26ȀPortAccessRoadInterchangeModificationReport TABLEOFCONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Project Location.................................................................................................................................................. 3 Project History.................................................................................................................................................... 3 Project Description ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Project Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................................. 9 Project Conceptual Design ................................................................................................................................ 11 Interchange Modification Report (IMR) Scope..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TRB Special Report 267: Regulation of Weights, Lengths, And
    Regulation of Weights, Lengths, and Widths of Commercial Motor Vehicles SPECIAL REPORT 267 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2002 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* Chairman: E. Dean Carlson, Secretary, Kansas Department of Transportation, Topeka Vice Chairman: Genevieve Giuliano, Professor, School of Policy, Planning, and Development, University of Southern California, Los Angeles Executive Director: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board William D. Ankner, Director, Rhode Island Department of Transportation, Providence Thomas F. Barry, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee Michael W. Behrens, Executive Director, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin Jack E. Buffington, Associate Director and Research Professor, Mack-Blackwell National Rural Transportation Study Center, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville Sarah C. Campbell, President, TransManagement, Inc., Washington, D.C. Joanne F. Casey, President, Intermodal Association of North America, Greenbelt, Maryland James C. Codell III, Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Frankfort John L. Craig, Director, Nebraska Department of Roads, Lincoln Robert A. Frosch, Senior Research Fellow, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts Susan Hanson, Landry University Professor of Geography, Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts Lester A. Hoel, L.A. Lacy Distinguished Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University
    [Show full text]
  • Market Feasibility Analysis
    Market Feasibility Analysis Tenley Commons 600 Lamar Road Macon, Bibb County, Georgia 31210 Prepared For Mr. Denis Blackburne Woda Cooper Companies, Inc. Tenley Commons Limited Partnership (Owner) 127 Abercorn Street, Suite 402 Savannah, Georgia 31401 Effective Date May 15, 2019 Job Reference Number 19-320 JW 155 E. Columbus Street, Suite 220 Pickerington, Ohio 43147 Phone: (614) 833-9300 Bowennational.com Table Of Contents A. Executive Summary B. Project Description C. Site Description and Evaluation D. Primary Market Area Delineation E. Community Demographic Data F. Economic Trends G. Project-Specific Demand Analysis H. Rental Housing Analysis (Supply) I. Absorption & Stabilization Rates J. Interviews K. Conclusions & Recommendations L. Signed Statement M. Market Study Representation N. Qualifications Addendum A – Field Survey of Conventional Rentals Addendum B – Comparable Property Profiles Addendum C – Market Analyst Certification Checklist Addendum D – Methodologies, Disclaimers & Sources Addendum E – Achievable Market Rent Analysis TOC-1 Section A – Executive Summary This report evaluates the market feasibility of the Tenley Commons rental community to be constructed utilizing financing from the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program in Macon, Georgia. Based on the findings contained in this report, we believe a market will exist for the subject development, as long as it is constructed and operated as proposed in this report: 1. Project Description: Tenley Commons involves the new construction of 70 apartments on an approximate 11.7-acre site at 600 Lamar Road in Macon. The project will offer 12 one-, 34 two- and 24 three-bedroom garden-style units in three (3) three-story, walk-up residential buildings together with a free-standing, 1,800 square-foot community building.
    [Show full text]
  • Franklin Park Mall Toledo, Ohio As the Only Enclosed Super-Regional Center in a 50
    Franklin Park Mall Franklin Park Mall Toledo, Ohio As the only enclosed super-regional center in a 50- mile radius, Franklin Park Mall impresses: 1.3 million MONROE, MI square feet; more than 45,000 trade area households MICHIGAN with incomes of $100,000 and above; retailers with OHIO top regional sales. TOLEDO, OH MAUMEE, OH But numbers don’t tell the whole story about the mall or deceptively affluent Toledo. A low cost of GIBSONBURG, OH 10 MILES living gives residents more money to spend on retail and dining. And the region’s demographics range from tech and medical professionals to the students training to join them. Franklin Park is where they celebrate the lifestyle they’ve earned — or aspire to. Franklin Park Mall Toledo, Ohio • Largest enclosed mall in Northwest Ohio • Enclosed, one-level super-regional mall • Mixes traditional and lifestyle tenants for one-stop shopping • A new Altar’d State and BoxLunch in 2017 Property Description major roads I-475 and Talmadge Road center description Enclosed, one-level center and Monroe Street anchors Macy’s, Dillard’s, JCPenney, Dick’s Sporting total sf 1,293,000 Goods, and Cinemark 16 & XD key tenants Apple Store, Williams-Sonoma, Pottery Barn, # of stores 142 Banana Republic, J Crew Mercantile, Pandora, Pink, Talbot’s, Swarovski, H&M, # of parking 6,100 Bravo Cucina Italiana,Dave & Buster’s, Sephora, Altar’d State, Ulta and BoxLunch THE CENTER THE MARKET STARWOOD Franklin Park Mall “Stop by Franklin Park Mall for the best bargains in fashion, electronics, and more” — DoToledo.org THE CENTER
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Provides Information on EGC ESP Site Location, On-Site
    CHAPTER 2 Site Characteristics This chapter provides information on the EGC ESP Site location, on-site activities and controls, present and projected population distribution, meteorological, hydrological, geological, and seismological characteristics. The purpose of presenting this information is to provide the bases for demonstrating the adequacy of the site characteristics from a site safety viewpoint and to provide input to support environmental characterization. The influence of the EGC ESP site characteristics on the design and operation of a possible future nuclear power facility will be assessed at the construction and operating license (COL) stage pursuant to 10 CFR 52 Subpart C. REV2 2-1 CHAPTER 2 - SITE CHARACTERISTICS SITE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT FOR EGC EARLY SITE PERMIT SECTION 2.1 – GEOGRAPHY AND DEMOGRAPHY 2.1 Geography and Demography 2.1.1 Site Location and Description 2.1.1.1 Specification of Location The EGC ESP Facility will be co-located on the property of the existing CPS Facility and its associated 4,895 ac man-made cooling reservoir (Clinton Lake) (CPS, 2002). The EGC ESP Facility will be located approximately 700 ft south of the existing CPS Facility. The CPS Facility lies within Zone 16 of the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates. The exact UTM coordinates for the EGC ESP Facility will depend upon the specific reactor technology selected for deployment and will be finalized at COL. As shown on Figures 1.2-1 and 2.1-1 there is a complex transportation system surrounding the EGC ESP Site. The nearest major highways are Illinois State Routes 54, 10, and 48, all of which cross the CPS Facility property.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Money Laundering Threat Assessment (MLTA)
    MONEY LAUNDERING THREAT ASSESSMENT WORKING GROUP Department of the Treasury Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence (TFI) • Office of Terrorist Financing & Financial Crime (TFFC) • Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) • Office of Intelligence and Analysis (OIA) • Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) • Executive Office for Asset Forfeiture (TEOAF) Internal Revenue Service (IRS) • Criminal Investigation (CI) • Small Business/Self Employed Division (SB/SE) Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) Criminal Division • Asset Forfeiture Money Laundering Section (AFMLS) National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC) Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System United States Postal Service (USPS) United States Postal Inspection Service (USPIS) U. S. Money Laundering Threat Assessment December 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS MONEY LAUNDERING THREAT ASSESSMENT Introduction ........................................................................................................................................i Banking ................................................................................................................................................ 1 Money Services Businesses ....................................................................................................... 7 Money Transmitters...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]