DOCSLIB.ORG

INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY Interstate 480 / Transportation Boulevard Interchange

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY Interstate 480 / Transportation Boulevard Interchange INTERCHANGE OPERATIONS STUDY Interstate 480 / Transportation Boulevard Interchange City of Garfield Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio Prepared For: City of Garfield Heights 5407 Turney Road Garfield Heights, OH 44125 & ODOT District 12 5500 Transportation Boulevard Garfield Heights, OH 44125 Prepared By: GPD Group 5595 Transportation Boulevard Suite 100 Cleveland, OH 44125 May 2016 Interchange Operations Study – Interstate 480 / Transportation Boulevard City of Garfield Heights, Ohio TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Purpose: ............................................................................................................................... 1 II. Study Area: ........................................................................................................................... 1 III. Traffic Volumes: ................................................................................................................... 1 ‘No-Build’ Traffic Volumes: ..................................................................................... 1 ‘Build’ Traffic Volumes: ........................................................................................... 2 IV. Alternatives Considered: ....................................................................................................... 2 V. Traffic Analysis: .................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology: .......................................................................................................... 3 Intersection Analysis: ............................................................................................... 3 Constrained Traffic Volumes: .................................................................................. 7 Freeway Section Analysis: ....................................................................................... 8 Ramp Junction Analyses: ....................................................................................... 10 Storage Length Calculations and Recommendations: ............................................. 11 VI. Summary and Recommendations: ...................................................................................... 13 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Level-of-Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Table 2: HCS Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary – Signalized Intersections – Design Year 2038 ‘No-Build’ vs. ‘Build’ Conditions Table 3: Constrained Traffic Volume Comparison – ‘No-Build’ vs. ‘Build’ Conditions Table 4: Level-of-Service Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments Table 5: Mainline Freeway Segment Levels-of-Service Summary – Design Year 2038 ‘No- Build’ vs. ‘Build’ Conditions Table 6: Level-of-Service Criteria for Freeway Merge and Diverge Areas of Influence Table 7: Ramp Areas of Influence Levels-of-Service Summary – Design Year 2038 ‘No- Build’ vs. ‘Build’ Conditions Table 8: Auxiliary Turn Lane Recommended Storage Lengths – Design Year 2038 ‘Build’ Conditions Page - i May 2016 Interchange Operations Study – Interstate 480 / Transportation Boulevard City of Garfield Heights, Ohio LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Certified Traffic Plates Appendix B: HCS Intersection Capacity Analysis Appendix C: Constrained Traffic Analysis Appendix D: HCS Freeway Capacity Analyses Appendix E: Storage Length Calculations LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Study Area Map Figure 2: Design Year 2038 ‘No-Build’ Traffic Volumes Figure 3: Design Year 2038 ‘Build’ Traffic Volumes Figure 4: ‘No-Build’ Traffic Control Diagram Figure 5: Conceptual Improvement Rendering Figure 6: Freeway Location Key Map Page - ii May 2016 Interchange Operations Study – Interstate 480 / Transportation Boulevard City of Garfield Heights, Ohio I. Purpose: The City of Garfield Heights and Craig Realty Group retained the services of GPD Group to perform an Interchange Operations Study (IOS) for the Interstate 480 / Transportation Boulevard interchange. The purpose of this study is to determine if the improvements proposed as part of the Outlets of Cleveland Traffic Impact Study will degrade the operation of Interstate 480 (I-480) in the immediate vicinity of the Transportation Boulevard interchange and if so, what actions are required to address such degradation. II. Study Area: The study area includes Transportation Boulevard from the Granger Road intersection (northern study limit) to the Vista Way intersection (southern study limit). The study area also includes the I-480 freeway segments entering / exiting the I-480 / Transportation Boulevard interchange as wells as the merge and diverge junctions of the Transportation Boulevard entrance / exit ramps. The study area limits on I-480 were provided by the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) District 12 and ODOT Central Office. See Figure 1 for a map of the study area. III. Traffic Volumes: ‘No-Build’ Traffic Volumes: For the Transportation Boulevard Interchange Operations Study, GPD Group supplied manual turning movement traffic counts for all study intersections to the ODOT Office of Statewide Planning and Research and requested that ODOT develop the certified traffic volumes for the Opening Year 2018 and Design Year 2038 traffic conditions for the Transportation Boulevard corridor. Additionally, ODOT was also requested to develop certified traffic volumes for the I-480 / Transportation Boulevard interchange which includes all entrance and exit ramps as well as mainline I-480 in the immediate vicinity of the interchange. Certified Traffic Plates were obtained from the ODOT Office of Statewide Planning and Research on February 24th, 2016 and are contained in Appendix A. These plates contain the Opening Year 2018 and Design Year 2038 ADT, AM Peak hour and PM Peak hour traffic volumes along with TD and T24 design designations. The Design Year 2038 ‘No-Build’ traffic volumes will incorporate the trip generation of the Outlets of Cleveland outlet mall that is expected to be developed in the near future. The development traffic was distributed and assigned to the ‘No-Build’ roadway network and incorporated into the Design Year 2038 ‘No-Build’ traffic scenario. The Design Year 2038 ‘No-Build’ traffic volumes are shown in Figure 2. Page - 1 May 2016 Interchange Operations Study – Interstate 480 / Transportation Boulevard City of Garfield Heights, Ohio ‘Build’ Traffic Volumes: The Design Year 2038 ‘Build’ traffic volumes will also incorporate the trip generation of the Outlets of Cleveland outlet mall that is expected to be developed in the near future. The ‘Build’ traffic volumes differ from the ‘No-Build’ traffic volumes with the construction of a new EB approach at the Transportation Boulevard / I-480 WB Ramps intersection, referred to as ‘Public Road #1’ for the remainder of this report. This new approach will become the main access point of the outlet mall which will cause traffic patterns for the trips generated by the outlet mall to change. The development traffic was redistributed and assigned to the ‘Build’ roadway network in order to account for the new access point of Public Road #1. The Design Year 2038 ‘Build’ traffic volumes are shown in Figure 3. IV. Alternatives Considered: For the purpose of analyzing the I-480 / Transportation Boulevard interchange, the following two (2) scenarios were evaluated: ‘No-Build’: The ‘No-Build’ scenario assumes no changes to the existing roadway configuration or traffic operations of the ramp terminal intersections at the Transportation Boulevard / I-480 interchange or anywhere within ODOT’s limited access area. It should be noted that, as part of the Outlets of Cleveland outlet mall project a new WB approach will be constructed at the current location of Center South Drive and ODOT’s access drive will be relocated to this location and signalized. Further detail of this intersection modification is provided under the ‘Build’ description below. The ‘No-Build’ scenario is the base condition to which the subsequent alternative is compared. See Figure 4 for a depiction of the ‘No-Build’ traffic conditions. ‘Build’ (As proposed in The Outlets of Cleveland Traffic Impact Study): The ‘Build’ scenario incorporates the following proposed improvements: . Transportation Boulevard / Center South Drive / ODOT Drive Intersection: o Construct a traffic signal and provide coordinated operation with the existing signal system along Transportation Boulevard o Construct a WB Approach with a single (left-thru-right) outbound lane and a single entering lane (ODOT Drive relocation) o Construct NB & SB left turn lanes . Transportation Boulevard / I-480 WB Ramps / Public Road #1 Intersection: o Construct an EB approach with three (3) outbound lanes (left, thru, right) and a single entering lane o Construct NB & SB left turn lanes o Construct a WB thru lane o Reconstruct traffic signal to accommodate new intersection geometry Page - 2 May 2016 Interchange Operations Study – Interstate 480 / Transportation Boulevard City of Garfield Heights, Ohio . Transportation Boulevard / I-480 EB Ramps / Antenucci Boulevard Intersection: o Restripe EB & WB approaches to have the following lane configurations: . EB approach – four (4) lanes (left, left, thru, right) . WB approach – three (3) lanes (left, thru, right) o Replace the split-phase operation with traditional eight-phase signal operation with the EB and WB left turn movements operating as protected only. The improvements listed above will require modification to signal phasing and timings and widening of Transportation Boulevard within the study area, including the bridge
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Directions to Cleveland Operations
    Directions to Cleveland Works 1600 Harvard Avenue Cleveland, OH 44105 Please note that there are no sleeping areas at this facility. You must stop at a rest area or truck stop. From Interstate 71 th North bound: Take 1-71 North to Exit 247A, W. 14 St. and Clark Ave. Make a right at the end of the exit ramp. nd Then take route 176 south, approx. ¼ mile on your left. Harvard Ave. will be your 2 exit. At the end of the rd ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be at the 3 traffic light on your right. ¾ Closest Rest Area Exit 209, Lodi From Interstate 77 North bound: Take 1-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave). At the end of the ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be about 1 mile on your left. ¾ Closest Rest Area Exit 111, North Canton From Interstate 80 East East or West bound: Exit 11 / 173 to I-77 North. Take I-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave). At the end of the ramp take a left. Gate 6 will be about 1 mile on your left. ¾ Closest Rest Area East Bound between exits 10 / 161 and 11 / 173 West Bound between exits 14 / 209 and 13A / 193 From Interstate 480 East bound: Exit 17 onto Route 176 North. Exit onto Harvard Ave. Take a right onto Harvard Ave. Gate 6 will rd be at the 3 traffic light on your right. ¾ Closest Rest Area None West bound: Exit 20B onto I-77 North. Take 1-77 North to exit 159A (Harvard Ave).
    [Show full text]
  • City of Cleveland Location in the NOACA Region
    CITY OF C LEVEL AND T HE C ITY OF C LEVELAND R OADWAY P AVEMENT M AINTENANCE R EPORT T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 2. Background ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3. PART I: 2016 Pavement Condition ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 4. PART II: 2018 Current Backlog ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 5. PART III: Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) Program ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1963 1963 the the of of of of Description Description
    e y ~ 'rte ~ 4 ~ ~~~. ~ ~ ~L +i's 's' ~ *" a~t,y'" J ^ ,..,T+s d az' ~ 8a•. ~r ~ ~Y. r~ ,~ } ~„ ~"' y s'~ ~- ~- N ~, 4 r ~ ts~ 0 ~ i~° e~ ~" t ~ y ~ _ ~ ~ y ^: *} ~ }t. ~ `/ ~ 6~ Y ~p S d~Y R" vW # ' `i ti r n' ke~s ~ J ~ ~ ~~ +3 ~ y t ~r x. t' ~ ~~ ~i _ ~.~y ~g x ,. 9~ :~ ~ x aaa+ra.. "' ~$ .;~w~.v 'Y~1se~n ~+~.~-*a fir;.: ~. ,... §~~`" u, a ., .. ~.: w Letters of Transmittal December 9, 1963 December 9, 1963 JOHN ERRECA EDMUND G. BROWN Director of Public Works Governor of California State of California My dear Governor: Dear Sir: The 17th Annual Report of the Division of Highways, Depart- In compliance with Section 143 of the Streets and Highways ment of Public Works, which I am pleased to submit to you, Code, the 17th Annual Report of the Division of Highways for presents a broad picture of the state highway program during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1963, is submitted herewith fiscal year 1962-63. It describes the steady progress in planning for your approval and transmittal to Governor Edmund G. and constructing today for tomorrow's transportation needs, as Brown. well as the activities of the division's various units. The report contains information on the construction program Your attention is invited to the comments contained in the through the end of 1963 and a description of the projects in enclosed letter of transmittal from the State Highway Engineer the budget for fiscal year 1964-65 which the California High- regarding progress on the interstate system and on the network way Commission adopted in October.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 65, No. 233/Monday, December 4, 2000
    Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 233 / Monday, December 4, 2000 / Notices 75771 2 departures. No more than one slot DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION In notice document 00±29918 exemption time may be selected in any appearing in the issue of Wednesday, hour. In this round each carrier may Federal Aviation Administration November 22, 2000, under select one slot exemption time in each SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, in the first RTCA Future Flight Data Collection hour without regard to whether a slot is column, in the fifteenth line, the date Committee available in that hour. the FAA will approve or disapprove the application, in whole or part, no later d. In the second and third rounds, Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the than should read ``March 15, 2001''. only carriers providing service to small Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. hub and nonhub airports may L. 92±463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: participate. Each carrier may select up is hereby given for the Future Flight Patrick Vaught, Program Manager, FAA/ to 2 slot exemption times, one arrival Data Collection Committee meeting to Airports District Office, 100 West Cross and one departure in each round. No be held January 11, 2000, starting at 9 Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208± carrier may select more than 4 a.m. This meeting will be held at RTCA, 2307, 601±664±9885. exemption slot times in rounds 2 and 3. 1140 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Suite Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on 1020, Washington, DC, 20036. November 24, 2000. e. Beginning with the fourth round, The agenda will include: (1) Welcome all eligible carriers may participate.
    [Show full text]
  • Stearns Road Corridor
    Potential Development Area (PDA) #2 I. PDA #2: Stearns Road/Interstate 480 Site Information o 62.05 Acres Total o 73 parcels – parcels are a majority of residential and some commercial o Zoning – please refer to zoning map below Traffic Data – Please refer below for a traffic count map. Accessibility – Stearns Road/Interstate 480 PDA #2 Interstate 480 At site Interstate 80 (Ohio Turnpike) 2.6 miles, 5 minutes Interstate 90 6.0 miles, 14 minutes Interstate 71 7.4 miles, 9 minutes Airports (Cleveland Hopkins International) 7.5 miles, 12 minutes Downtown Cleveland 17.2 miles, 19 minutes Wood Potential Development Area Pheasants Lorain Wellesley ¹ Elmhurst 72 71 1 70 69 4 68 2 3 67 5 66 6 65 64 7 63 8 62 9 10 61 11 60 59 12 58 13 Gareau 57 Sherwood 56 14 ForestRidge 55 15 54 16 53 17 Park Ridge 52 18 51 19 Stearns 50 20 49 21 48 22 47 23 46 24 45 25 44 26 43 27 42 28 41 40 29 Windsor Cambridge 39 30 38 31 33 32 34 Somerset 35 36 Stafford 37 Christman Brighton Surrey I-480 Aspen Tudor Current Zoning of Potential Development Area Berkshire Quail Whitehaven Wood ¹ Pheasants Elmhurst Lorain Wellesley Mc Kenzie Gareau Sherwood ForestRidge Park Ridge Stearns Windsor Cambridge Somerset Stafford Christman Surrey Brighton I-480 Legend Aspen One Family Residential One Family Residential One Family Residential General Retail Business Parcel Data – Stearns Road/I-480 PDA #2 Total Value Property Map ID Parcel Acres Owner Name Address Total Tax Value Total Value BLD LND Class 1 23420004 3.51 Viviani Fam Ltd Part.
    [Show full text]
  • 02-16-16 MINUTES of the 626Th MEETING
    MINUTES OF THE 626th MEETING OF THE OHIO TURNPIKE AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMMISSION FEBRUARY 16, 2016 Chairman: Good morning ladies and gentlemen, it is 10:01 a.m. Would you please rise as we say our Pledge of Allegiance. The Meeting will come to order. Have all guests signed the sign-in sheet in the Lobby? If not, please do so prior to leaving, so we can maintain an accurate record of attendance. Both Senator Manning and Mr. Kauffman advised that they are unable to attend today’s Commission. Will the Assistant Secretary-Treasurer please call the roll? Assistant Secretary-Treasurer: Chairman Hruby Chairman Hruby: Here Assistant Secretary-Treasurer: Commissioner Paradiso Vice Chairman Paradiso: Here Assistant Secretary-Treasurer: Commissioner Barber Secretary-Treasurer Barber: Here Assistant Secretary-Treasurer: Commissioner McAuliffe Mr. McAuliffe: Here Chairman Hruby: Thank you, we have a quorum. Chairman: This is the 626th Meeting of the Ohio Turnpike and Infrastructure Commission. We are meeting here at the Commission’s headquarters, as provided for in the Commission’s Code of Bylaws for a Commission Special Meeting. Various reports will be received, and we will act on several resolutions. Draft copies have previously been sent to the Members and updated drafts are in the Members’ folders. The Resolutions will be explained during the appropriate reports. May I have a motion to adopt the Minutes of the January 19, 2016, Commission Meeting? 14930 MOTION: A motion to adopt the Minutes of the January 19, 2016, Commission Meeting was made by Vice Chairman Paradiso and seconded by Mr. McAuliffe. All Commission Members present voted to approve the Minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • ODOT District 12 2021 Construction Program
    ODOT District 12 2021 Construction Program Lake Geauga Cu GARFIELD HTS. yahoga 12 SERVING CUYAHOGA, GEAUGA AND LAKE COUNTIES Mike DeWine, Ohio Governor | Jack Marchbanks, Ph. D., ODOT Director | John Picuri P.E., District Deputy Director ODOT DISTRICTODOT District12 | 2018 12 CONSTRUCTION 2021 Construction GUIDE Program Table of Contents Overview..................................................................... Page 2 Cuyahoga County....................................................... Pages 3-26 Geauga County........................................................... Pages 27-32 Lake County................................................................ Pages 33-38 Regional Projects....................................................... Pages 39-40 Local-Let Projects........................................................ Page 41-42 LOCAL LET PROJECTS 1 ODOT DISTRICTODOT District12 | 2018 12 CONSTRUCTION 2021 Construction GUIDE Program The Ohio Department of Transportation District 12 is responsible for the maintenance and construction on all Interstates, U.S. Routes, and State Routes in unincorporated municipalities in Cuyahoga, Geauga, and Lake counties. Each spring, we shift our focus from snow and ice removal to the construction and maintenance of our roadways. The 2021 Construction Program includes information about major construction projects in the District 12 tri-county area. For up to date project information and to sign up to receive project-related emails, please visit www.transportation.ohio.gov. To find additional project
    [Show full text]
  • Download Authenticated
    Ohio Administrative Code Rule 4901:2-8-04 Prohibitions. Effective: July 18, 2013 (A) As used in this rule, "northeast Ohio" means the following counties in the state of Ohio: Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain, Medina. (B) As used in this rule, "through transportation" means the transportation of hazardous materials which has neither a place of origin nor a destination in northeast Ohio. (C) The following routes shall be designated routes for the through transportation of hazardous materials in northeast Ohio: (1) Interstate 90 from the Lake/Ashtabula county line to interstate 271 in Lake county. (2) Interstate 80 and interstate 80/90 (Ohio Turnpike) from gate 13 in Portage county to the Lorain/Erie county line. (3) Interstate 271 from interstate 90 in Lake county to interstate 71 in Medina county. (4) Interstate 77 from interstate 80 in Cuyahoga county to interstate 271 in Summit county. (5) Interstate 71 from interstate 80 in Cuyahoga county to Medina/Wayne county line. (6) Interstate 480 from interstate 80, gate 13 in Portage county to interstate 271 in Summit county. (7) Interstate 480 from interstate 480N in Cuyahoga county to interstate 80 in Lorain county. (8) Interstate 480N from interstate 271 to interstate 480 in Cuyahoga county. (D) The following routes shall be restricted routes for the through transportation of hazardous materials in northeast Ohio: Page 1 (1) Interstate 90 from interstate 271 in Lake county to interstate 80/90 in Lorain county. (2) Interstate 71 from interstate 80 to interstate 90 in Cuyahoga county. (3) Interstate 77 from interstate 80 to interstate 90 in Cuyahoga county.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 100/Friday, May 23, 2014/Notices
    29836 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 100 / Friday, May 23, 2014 / Notices Pursuant to section 10(d) of the to the Airport. These intangible benefits boulevard. Those actions grant Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 will offset the value of the released approvals for the project. U.S.C. App 10(d), and 5 U.S.C. property. DATES: A claim seeking judicial review 552b(c)(1), it has been determined that DATES: Comments must be received on of the Federal agency actions on the this Board meeting will be closed to the or before June 23, 2014. highway project will be barred unless public because the Board will be the claim is filed on or before October reviewing and discussing matters ADDRESSES: Comments on this 20, 2014. If this date falls on a Saturday, properly classified in accordance with application may be mailed or delivered Sunday, or legal holiday, parties are Executive Order 13526. The purpose of to the FAA at the following address: advised to file their claim no later than the ISAB is to provide the Department Terry J. Page, Manager, FAA the business day preceding this date. If with a continuing source of Washington Airports District Office, the Federal law that authorizes judicial independent advice on all aspects of 23723 Air Freight Lane, Suite 210, review of a claim provides a time period arms control, disarmament, Dulles, VA 20166. of less than 150 days for filing such nonproliferation, political-military In addition, one copy of any claim, then that shorter time period still affairs, international security, and comments submitted to the FAA must applies.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaker Heights' Revolt Against Highways
    Shaker Heights’ Revolt Against Highways Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Megan Lenore Chew Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2009 Thesis Committee: William Childs, Advisor Paula Baker Kevin Boyle Copyright by Megan Chew 2009 Abstract This narrative details how highway building, environmentalism, race and class intersected in suburban Shaker Heights, Ohio, during the 1960s. The methodology combines local, environmental, political and social histories. While the city’s successful racial integration narrative has defined Shaker Heights, its class narrative is also significant. The unsuccessful attempts to build the Clark and Lee freeway through the eastern suburbs of Cleveland reveal important aspects of the class narrative and had national resonance, directly and indirectly connecting to important individuals and movements of the era. The success of the anti-freeway movement adds to Shaker’s atypical postwar social narrative. Part of a larger movement of freeway revolts, the Shaker Heights activists benefited from class advantages, political connections and the evolution of Interstate highway legislation since 1956. Activists benefited from built and natural environmental movements of the 1960s as well. In succeeding in preventing the highways, citizens managed to protect the suburb’s prewar character during an era of massive physical and social change. Rejecting an archetypal view of suburbs in the postwar era, this project stresses the importance of looking at the variability of actions, individuals and ideas within individual communities. Singular narratives of postwar ii suburbs, or of suburbs themselves, obscure these differences and prioritize certain narratives over others, including the narrative of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazardous Materials Route Registry
    LEGEND Restrictions (Columns A to K) Designations (Columns L to P) 0 = All Hazmats A = All NRHM Hazmats 1 = Class 1 Explosives B = Class 1 Explosives 2 = Class 2 - Gas P = Class 7 HRCQ Radioactive 3 = Class 3 - Flammable I = Toxic Inhalation Hazard (TIH) 4 = Class 4 - Flammable Solid/Combustible M = Medical Waste 5 = Class 5 - Organic 6 = Class 6 - Poison 7 = Class 7 - Radioactive ID 8 = Class 8 - Corrosives REST = Restricted Route 9 = Class 9 - Dangerous (Other) PREF = Preferred Route i = Toxic Inhalation Hazard (TIH) PRES = Prescribed Route RECOM - Recommended Route YEAR DATE ID A B C D E F G HIJ K BLANK L NO P M STATE_ TEXT STATE CITY COUNTY ABBR ALABAMA YEAR DATE ID A B C D E F G HIJ K BLANK L NO P M STATE_ TEXT STATE CITY COUNTY ABBR 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALBattleship Parkway [Mobile] froma By Bridge Rd. Alabama Mobile [Mobile] to Interstate 10 [exit 27] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALBay Bridge Rd. [Mobile] from Interstate 165 to Alabama Mobile Battleship Parkway [over Africa Town Cochran Bridge] [Westbound Traffic: Head south on I165; To by-pass the downtown area, head north on I165.] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 10 from Mobile City Limits to Exit 26B Alabama Mobile [Water St] [Eastbound Traffic: To avoid the downtown area, exit on I-65 North] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 10 from Mobile City Limits to Exit 27 Alabama Mobile 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 65 from Interstate 10 ton Iterstate 165 Alabama Mobile [A route for trucks wishing to by-pass the downtown area.] 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 65 from Mobile City Limits to Interstate Alabama Mobile 165 1996 08/26/96 PREF - ---------- ---P- ALInterstate 165 from Water St.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Impact Stabement
    Final Environmental Impact Stabement for the Nevada Test Site and Off-Site Locations in the State of Nevada Volume 1 Appendix I U.S. Department of Energy Nevada Operations Office Las Vegas, Nevada NEVADA TESTSITE Flh'AL ENV1ROh'ME.NTAL IMPACTSTATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS ....................................................................... iv SUMMARY ....................................................................... S- l 1 .O INTRODUCTION ....... ............................. 1. I Purpose and Scope ....... ............................. 1.2 Background Information . ............................. 1.3 Summary of Results . .......................................... 1-6 1.3.1 Defense Pro ................. .................. 1-6 1.3.2 Waste Man ................. ............. 1-6 1.4 Conclusions .................................. .................. 1-1 2.0 PUBLIC ISSUES .... ............................................. 2-1 2. I Public Involvement ......................................... 2-1 2.2 Stakeholder Issues ........................... ........2-7 2.2. I Transportation Management Operations ............. ......... 2-7 2.2.2 Local Segments of Concern ................. .......... 2-8 2.2.3 Routing . ....................... ........... .2-11 2.2.4 Rail Option , , . ................ .2-11 2.2.5 Health Risks .................. 2.2.6 Transportation Protocol Working Gr 2.3 American Indian Issues ................ ...................... 2-16 2.4 Conclusions ......................... ...................... 2-16 3.0 TRANSPORTATION
    [Show full text]