CITY OF C LEVEL AND T HE C ITY OF C LEVELAND R OADWAY P AVEMENT M AINTENANCE R EPORT T ABLE OF C ONTENTS 1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 2 2. Background ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3. PART I: 2016 Pavement Condition ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 4. PART II: 2018 Current Backlog ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 34 5. PART III: Maintenance & Rehabilitation (M&R) Program ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 6. PART IV: Comparative Analysis ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 7. Appendix ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 38 M APS 1: City of Cleveland Location in the NOACA Region ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 2: 2016 City of Cleveland Pavement Condition ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 F IGURES 1: 2016 Cleveland Pavement Network Condition Chart by Lane-Miles ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 8 2: The PCR Acceptable Level and “Need Year” Relation .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 35 3: Average PCR Comparison by the Constraint Scenarios and by Year ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 37 T ABLES 1: Selected Pavement Treatments and Their Planning Level Costs ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 2: 2016 Cleveland Pavement Network Condition ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 3: 2016 City of Cleveland Pavement Condition Listing ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 4: Performance Comparison of the Constraint Scenarios ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 36 A PPENDIX The “2018 Current Backlog” Pavement Treatment List ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 The “Maintain 15% Deficiency” Pavement Treatment List ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 41 The “Maintain an Average Network PCR of 80” Pavement Treatment List ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 The “Maintain Lowest Standard PCR” Pavement Treatment List ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 65 The “M&R” Pavement Treatment List and Map ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 82 1 | Page T HE C ITY OF C LEVELAND R OADWAY P AVEMENT M AINTENANCE R EPORT E XECUTIVE S UMMARY The 2016 Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) pavement database has 3,626 segment records for the Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency (NOACA) region. The NOACA region has a total of 3,330 centerline miles of roadways including freeways and federal-aid highways which is equivalent to 8,561 lane-miles. The regional segment average Pavement Condition Ratings (PCR) is about 77. In the City of Cleveland there are 318.98 centerline miles of federal-aid roads, which are equivalent to 1,098.17 lane-miles within the city boundary that include Interstate 71 (I 71), Interstate 77 (I 77), Interstate 90 (I 90), Interstate 480 (I 480), Interstate 490 (I 490), U. S. Route 6 (US 6), U. S. Route 20 (US 20), U. S. Route 42 (US 42), U. S. Route 322 (US 322), U. S. Route 422 (US 422), State Route 176 (SR 176), State Route 2 (SR 2), State Route 8 (SR 8), State Route 10 (SR 10), State Route 14 (SR 14), State Route 17 (SR 17), State Route 43 (SR 43), State Route 87 (SR 87), State Route 94 (SR 94), State Route 237 (SR 237), and State Route 283 (SR 283). The 2016 ODOT pavement database has 622 segment records for the City of Cleveland roadway system. Each record comprises of several fields of various information and measures such as Street name, Length (miles), Lane-miles length, Number of Lanes, Function Class, Pavement Condition Ratings (PCR), etc. According to the PCR measure, about 54 percent of the pavement lane-miles are currently in the “Good” to “Very Good” condition. About 15 percent of the lane-miles are in the “Poor” to “Very Poor” status and demand some kind of immediate preventive maintenance and /or rehabilitation treatments. This pavement study includes four parts: • Part I: The 2016 pavement network condition, • Part II: The 2018 backlog, • Part III: The Maintenance and Rehabilitation (M&R) program, • Part IV: The Comparative analysis. Considering the five-year study period of 2018 – 2022, this pavement study focuses on the required preventive maintenance treatments and some rehabilitation techniques rather than reconstruction. Part I of this study analyzes the 2016 pavement network condition and tabulates the important information of all the 622 road segments in the City of Cleveland. In Part II, the backlog is defined as the cost of pavement rehabilitation of all roads within one year (2018) and bringing the average network PCR to 80. Backlog is a “snapshot” or relative measure of outstanding rehabilitation work. Part III introduces the optimal preventive maintenance and rehabilitation strategy for each segment and its recommended implementation year based on the NOACA maintenance decision tree. Finally, Part IV compares the backlog and the “M&R” program with the NOACA transportation asset management strategies. All these strategies were compared regarding their costs, the average network PCR and percent of the lane-miles below the acceptable level. 2 | Page T HE C ITY OF C LEVELAND R OADWAY P AVEMENT M AINTENANCE R EPORT B ACKGROUND The City of Cleveland is the county seat for Cuyahoga County and is located on the southern shore of Lake Erie. Cleveland was named on July 22, 1796, when surveyors of the Connecticut Land Company laid out Connecticut's Western Reserve into townships and a capital city. They named it "Cleaveland" after their