DOCSLIB.ORG

Legend People and Ethnic Groups According to 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Legend People and Ethnic Groups According to 2010 Finnish Tatars Migrated at the end of 19th century from the Nizhniy Novgorod area. They populate the largest cities of the country. Lithuanian Tatars (also Lithuanian-Polish, Belorussian, Lipka Tatars) Descendants of the Golden Horde who became servants to the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. They lost their native language, but developed a written Izhemsky District language based on old Belarusian Oil extraction, work migration, using Arabic script. second half of 20th century and 21st century. Vorkuta Ostroh Tatars Nizhgari Kostroma Tatars of Crimean origin living Tatars of Nizhny Novgorod. Tatars in the city of Ostroh and Migrants from villages of Volhynia (Yuvkivtsi, Romanov city in the etc) from the 17th century until 18th century, where Chulyms Legend beginning of the 20th century. Krasnooktyabrsk Ivan the Terrible made (Chulym Tatars) East them settled in the Turkic non-Muslim small Yellow – ethnic groups which National Self-identification Tatar Ethnographic History Dialectology y District people group. 16th century A.D. Tatars comprise of 69% are not related to Tatar or which Crimean Tatars consider Kazan, Siberian, Astrakhan, There are three main dialects of the of the population. Nizhgari relation is disputed. themselves to be a distinct ethnic and Crimean Tatars originated in Tatar language in traditional Russian Romanian Tatars Tatars of Nizhny Novgorod. Grey – prominent areas with They moved to Dobruja from Karatai Beserman group […identify themselves as a related Khanates. classification: northern areas of the Black Sea Moscow Ethnic Mokshas (Mordvin) who Udmurt ethnic group having settlements of various Tatar distinct nation] and other Tatar Mishars originated in the south- • Western (Mishar) region after the area was occupied Qasim Tatars adopted the Tatar language. probable Tatar origin. groups. by the Russian Empire. Descendants of Kazan groups as closely related, along with eastern part of the Golden Horde, • Middle (Kazan) Tatars who resettled to Areas of settlement of Mishar, Nogais, Kumyks, Karachais, etc. which was under control of • Eastern (Siberian) the Qasim Khanate. They speak the Middle dialect Noqrat (Karynski) Kazan, and Siberian Tatars are Kazan Tatars consider all Tatars Moskovy. Being under Russian The spoken language of the Astrakhan Chepetsky of the Tatar language. Tatars marked according to areas of Crimean Tatars (Glazovsk) Tatars (including Crimean Tatars) as one authority the Mishar settled in the Tatars is the middle dialect. They live in Kirov Oblast and Including Gypsies of Taisha and dialect distributions. are descendants of peoples of Living within the territory Tatar people. Volga and Ural regions. Some sources determine the Siberian Gurbety, also Crimean Karaites Perm (Sylvinski) the Karynsk principality. of Udmurtia and Krymchaks , their languages Tatars Population size and share are Among Siberian Tatars, Kriashens Teptyar (Bashkirs) – A group of Tatar language having three subdivisions: are an ethnolect of Crimean Kadomsky given according to the 2010 and to a smaller degree even among Tatars loyal to the Russian Empire • Tobol-Irtysh Tatar language. Tatars population censes. Mishars, there are movements for in the Urals, having Mari and • Baraba Donbass Tatars self-identification as a distinct ethnic Udmurt roots. • Tomsk Migrant laborers from People and ethnic groups group, but during the censuses they Kriashens are Christianized The Crimean Tatar language is Russia in the second according to 2010 Russia Crimean Tatars half of 20th century. Sasovo Tatars identified themselves simply as Tatars. classified as having the three following in Kuban region Tatars living in the Khanty-Mansi and Population Census: Tatars. Nagaibaks are Christianized dialects: Settled since 1957 in Sasovsky District of Yamalo-Nenets Districts an attempt to live in Ryazan Oblast. Migrated Tatars, incl. Astrakhan Tatars, Some people groups of the North Tatars who were loyal to the • Steppe (Nogay) close proximity to in the early part of the Oil extraction, work migration, second Crimea. Censuses 20th century, to the Penza Kazan half of 20th century and 21st century. Kriashens, Mishars, and Siberian Caucasus region and Siberia were Russian Empire. • Middle (from the Crimean Mountains) wrongly identify them Turkmensky District of Tatars. known under the name ‘Tatars’ in the Volga Tatars are Kazan Tatars • Southern Coast (Oghuz) as Tatars. Stavropol Krai. Tobolo-Irtysh Tatars Nagaibak Russian Empire, and not only with and Mishars. Sometimes this These languages and dialects are part Greek Urums Includes the Tars, Tevriz, Forced to leave Crimea Bukharans, Zabolotnie, Crimean Tatars Turkic origins. name is used in relation to Kazan of Kipchak group of the Turkic language and settle in North Azov Tobolsk, Tiumen and others. (present-day Donetsk Some Siberian peoples (Khakass, Tatars only, sometimes it is used family (along with Kazakh, Bashkir, Oblast, Ukraine) in the People and ethnic groups Shors, Telengit, Altai peoples and for Kazan Tatars, Mishars, and Karachay-Balkar, Kumyk and others). The late 1770s. The Urum language is considered according to 2001 Ukraine others) retained their self-designated Astrakhan Tatars. southern coast dialect of the Crimean Okhinsky a variant of the Crimean Kriashens Population Census: name “Tadar”. Tatar (Oghuz) is a sub-branch of the Tatar language. District Christianized Tatars Turkic language family (along with living in small groups Tatars Oil extraction among Muslim Ufa Crimean Tatars Turkish, Azerbaijani, Turkmen and others. Tatars in Tatarstan. Yekaterinburg Neverkinsky District Tyumen Tatars comprise 51% of the population. Chelyabinsk Tobolsk Kamyshlinsky Orenburg District Starokulatkinsky District Tatars comprise 81% of the Tatars comprise 93% of the population. The district was Baraba Tatars Chulyms population. established as the Omsk Tomsk Tatars (Chulym Tatars) East Bodaybinsky Baytugansky Ethnic (Tatar) (Eushta, Chats, Kalmaks) Turkic non-Muslim District District. small people group. Pyrovski District Gold mining in Bodaybo. Kurilsky Tatars are 26% of the Teptyari District Karagash population. Migrants since the Smaller groups living Kushatsky Tatars early 20th century caused by (Kundrov Tatars) considered in the Pre-Ural region In the early 20th century Stalin’s agrarian reform. to be part of Nogai group. among Bashkirs and they settled in Argayash Mishars. They speak Canton of Bashkurdistan Bogrudelik the middle dialect of (today Chelyabinsk Astrakhan Tatars the Tatar language. Oblast). Siberian Tatar village in Turkey, Utari Ichkynski Tatars Tomsk Including Yurt Tatars of they settled there in 1909. (Alabugatski Tatars) of Nogai origin. Migrated in the 17-18th Southern- Nogai origin. They are centuries. In early 20th Kurilsky District officially considered as century to Yalansky Canton Novosibirsk Krasnoyarsk Astrakhan Tatars. Nagaibaks of Bashkurdistan . Christianized Tatars, served in army of the Russian Empire. They live in Nagaybaksky District of Chelyabinsk Oblast. Officially recognized as a Crimean Tatars in Turkey distinct ethnic group. Migrated in 18-19th century A.D. Azerbaijani During the Russian Empire, they were called Caucasus Tatars, although the Azerbaijan language is part of Oghuz language group and not part of Kipchak language group, the Tatar language is part of the latter. The name Tatar sometimes was applied to North Caucasus Turkic peoples. Dàquán Tatar District (XUAR, China) Siberian Tatars who emigrated in 1830s..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Linguapax Review 2010 Linguapax Review 2010
    LINGUAPAX REVIEW 2010 MATERIALS / 6 / MATERIALS Col·lecció Materials, 6 Linguapax Review 2010 Linguapax Review 2010 Col·lecció Materials, 6 Primera edició: febrer de 2011 Editat per: Amb el suport de : Coordinació editorial: Josep Cru i Lachman Khubchandani Traduccions a l’anglès: Kari Friedenson i Victoria Pounce Revisió dels textos originals en anglès: Kari Friedenson Revisió dels textos originals en francès: Alain Hidoine Disseny i maquetació: Monflorit Eddicions i Assessoraments, sl. ISBN: 978-84-15057-12-3 Els continguts d’aquesta publicació estan subjectes a una llicència de Reconeixe- ment-No comercial-Compartir 2.5 de Creative Commons. Se’n permet còpia, dis- tribució i comunicació pública sense ús comercial, sempre que se’n citi l’autoria i la distribució de les possibles obres derivades es faci amb una llicència igual a la que regula l’obra original. La llicència completa es pot consultar a: «http://creativecom- mons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/es/deed.ca» LINGUAPAX REVIEW 2010 Centre UNESCO de Catalunya Barcelona, 2011 4 CONTENTS PRESENTATION Miquel Àngel Essomba 6 FOREWORD Josep Cru 8 1. THE HISTORY OF LINGUAPAX 1.1 Materials for a history of Linguapax 11 Fèlix Martí 1.2 The beginnings of Linguapax 14 Miquel Siguan 1.3 Les débuts du projet Linguapax et sa mise en place 17 au siège de l’UNESCO Joseph Poth 1.4 FIPLV and Linguapax: A Quasi-autobiographical 23 Account Denis Cunningham 1.5 Defending linguistic and cultural diversity 36 1.5 La defensa de la diversitat lingüística i cultural Fèlix Martí 2. GLIMPSES INTO THE WORLD’S LANGUAGES TODAY 2.1 Living together in a multilingual world.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.2 Eurasia 81 2.2 EURASIA
    Regional Overview 2.2 Eurasia 81 2.2 EURASIA ALBANIA ARMENIA AZERBAIJAN BELARUS BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA BULGARIA CROATIA CZECHIA ESTONIA GEORGIA HUNGARY KOSOVO KAZAKHSTAN KYRGYZSTAN LATVIA LITHUANIA MOLDOVA MONTENEGRO NORTH MACEDONIA POLAND ROMANIA RUSSIA SERBIA SLOVAKIA SLOVENIA TAJIKISTAN TURKMENISTAN UKRAINE UZBEKISTAN 82 Global State of Harm Reduction 2020 TABLE 2.2.1: Epidemiology of HIV and viral hepatitis, and harm reduction response in Eurasia Country/ People who HIV Hepatitis C Hepatitis Harm reduction response territory with inject drugs prevalence (anti HCV) B (anti- reported among prevalence HBsAg) injecting drug people who among prevalence Peer use inject drugs people who among NSP1 OAT2 distribution DCRs3 (%) inject drugs people of naloxone (%) who inject drugs (%) Albania 5,132-6,182[1] 0.5[2] 28.8[2] 11.5[2] 2[3,4] 6[3,4] (M,B) x x Armenia 9,000[5] 1.9[5] 66.1[5] nk 12[3,4] 4[3,4] (M) x x Azerbaijan 60,000[6] 6.9[6] 43.9[7] 7.3[7] 17[8] 2[3,4] (M) x x Belarus 66,500[9] 30.8[10] 58.2[10] 2.4[10] 34[11] 19[4,11] (M) x x Bosnia and 12,500[9] 0.0[9,12]4 30.8[12] 0.2-3.1[12] 5[13] 12[12] (M,O) x x Herzegovina Bulgaria 18,500[14] 6[15] 76.8[15] 5.0[15] x[15,16] 30[15] (M,B,O) x x Croatia 6,300[17] 0.5[17] 38.2[17] 0.9[8] 144[18] [17] (M,B,O) x x Czechia 43,700[19] 0.1[19] 14.7[19] 15.1[8] 164[18] [19] (M,B,BN) x x Estonia 8,600[20] 51.4[21] 79.7[21] 5.7[21] 41[4,18] 8[20] (M,B,BN) [20]5 x Georgia 52,500[22] 2.3[23] 65-75.0[23] 7.2[8] 22[3] 18[3] (M,BN) x x Hungary 6,707[24] 0.2[24]6 49.7[24] 2.2[8] 40[18] 15[3] (M,B) x x Kazakhstan
    [Show full text]
  • Identity, Autonomy and Conflict in Republics of Russia and Ukraine
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Communist and Post-Communist Studies 41 (2008) 79e91 www.elsevier.com/locate/postcomstud Identity, autonomy and conflict in republics of Russia and Ukraine Karina V. Korostelina Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University, 3330 N. Washington Blvd., Truland Building, 5th Floor, Arlington, VA 22201, United States Available online 19 February 2008 Abstract This paper discusses the results of the survey conducted in co-operation with the European Research Center for Migration and Ethnic Relations, concerning identity in the Autonomous Republics of Russia and Ukraine. The survey queried 6522 residents of such republics as Bash- kortostan, Karelia, Komi, Sakha (Yakutia), and Tatarstan in Russia, and Crimea in Ukraine. It examined the construction of social identities, common narratives regarding threats and deprivations, confidence in public institutions, the prevalence of views toward national minor- ities as ‘fifth columns’, ethnic stereotypes, ethnocentrism, and other conflict indicators. An early warning model, built on the basis of the results, measured the potential for conflict based on these factors, and found that it was most pronounced in Bashkortostan and Crimea, and to a lesser extent in Tatarstan. Conflict was less likely in Sakha, Karelia, and Komi, although there were still certain indicators that suggested potential problems, including moderate support for independence in these republics. Ó 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Regents of the University of California. Keywords: Russia; Ukraine; Ethnic; National; Regional and religious identity; Autonomy; Conflict; Stereotypes; Threat; Trust; Deprivation; Ethnic minorities Introduction Since the fall of the USSR, several Autonomous Republics of the Russian Feder- ation have been seeking increased autonomy from Moscow.
    [Show full text]
  • FSC National Risk Assessment
    FSC National Risk Assessment for the Russian Federation DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURE FSC-PRO-60-002 V3-0 Version V1-0 Code FSC-NRA-RU National approval National decision body: Coordination Council, Association NRG Date: 04 June 2018 International approval FSC International Center, Performance and Standards Unit Date: 11 December 2018 International contact Name: Tatiana Diukova E-mail address: [email protected] Period of validity Date of approval: 11 December 2018 Valid until: (date of approval + 5 years) Body responsible for NRA FSC Russia, [email protected], [email protected] maintenance FSC-NRA-RU V1-0 NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 2018 – 1 of 78 – Contents Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for the Russian Federation ................................................. 3 1 Background information ........................................................................................................... 4 2 List of experts involved in risk assessment and their contact details ........................................ 6 3 National risk assessment maintenance .................................................................................... 7 4 Complaints and disputes regarding the approved National Risk Assessment ........................... 7 5 List of key stakeholders for consultation ................................................................................... 8 6 List of abbreviations and Russian transliterated terms* used ................................................... 8 7 Risk assessments
    [Show full text]
  • A Female Demon of Turkic Peoples
    Acta Ethnographica Hungarica 64(2), 413–424 (2019) DOI: 10.1556/022.2019.64.2.11 Albasty: A Female Demon of Turkic Peoples Edina Dallos Research Fellow, MTA–ELTE–SZTE Silk Road Research Group, Hungary Abstract: Albasty is one of the most commonly known malevolent beings among Turkic peoples from the Altay Mountains via the Caucasus and up as far as the Volga River. This article focuses on Turkic data from the Volga region (Chuvash, Tartar, Bashkir) and the Eurasian Steppe (Kazak, Kyrgyz, Nogay, Uzbek). Various areas can be ascertained on the basis of verbal charms and folk-belief narratives. On the Eurasian Steppe, for example, Albasty was first and foremost a puerperal demon. In this territory, specialists (kuuču) were called in to keep away or oust the demon at birth. Many recorded legends and memorates concern healing methods and the process of becoming a healer. In contrast, epic texts or narratives are rarer,in the Volga region, yet there are certain verbal incantations against the Albasty, which here is rather a push or disease demon. Keywords: Turkic beliefs, Turkic folklore texts, Turkic demonology, folklore of Inner Asia In this paper, I will endeavour to give an overview of a mythical creature, the concept of which is widespread among most Turkic peoples. This belief has a long history and can also be evidenced in the myths and beliefs of peoples neighbouring the Turks. No other Turkic mythical beast has such extensive literature devoted to it as the Albasty. Although most relevant literature deals with the possible etymologies of the term, there are plenty of ethnographic descriptions available as well.
    [Show full text]
  • A Manual on the Turanians and Pan-Turanianism
    I . L LD. 1199 MANUAL ON THE TURANIANS AND PAN-TURANIANISM Compiled by the Geographical Section of the Naval Intelligence Division, Naval Staff, Admiralty LONDON: PUBLISHED BY HIS MAJESTY'S STATIONERY OFFICE. ,To be purchased through any Bookseller or directly from H.M. STATIONERY OFFICE at the following addresses : Imperial House, Kingsway, London, W.C. 2, and 28 Abingdon Street, London, S.W. 1 ; 37 Peter Street, Manchester ; 1 St. Andrew's Crescent, Cardiff ; 23 Forth Street, Edinburgh ; or from E. PONSONBY, Ltd., 116 Grafton Street, Dublin. Price 7s, 6d. net Printed under the authority of His Majesty's Stationery Office By Frederick Hall at the University Press, Oxford. j]sn 1: - / NOTE The present Manual has been written with a view to supplying the information which is essential to a thorough understanding of the character and aims of ^ Pan-Turanianism '. The work is divided into six chapters. The first, after stating the source and meaning of the term ' Turanian % furnishes a general survey of the Turanian race, setting forth its origin, migrations, present dis- tribution, numbers, characteristics, language, religion, and civilization. The following chapters describe the five main branches of the Turanian people together with the subdivisions of each branch. Each chapter begins with a general characterization of the branch with which it deals. Then comes a detailed account of the tribes forming divisions of the main branch. Each is uniformly de- scribed with regard to its habitat, name, number, mode of life, characteristics, language, literature, religion, and history. This arrangement is intended to facilitate the comparison of the numerous tribes described in the Manual.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crimean Tatars and Their Russian-Captive Slaves an Aspect of Muscovite-Crimean Relations in the 16Th and 17Th Centuries
    The Crimean Tatars and their Russian-Captive Slaves An Aspect of Muscovite-Crimean Relations in the 16th and 17th Centuries Eizo MATSUKI The Law Code of Tsar Aleksei Mikhailovich (Ulozhenie), being formed of 25 chapters and divided into 976 articles, is the last and the most systematic codification of Muscovite Law in early modern Russia. It was compiled in 1649, that is more than one and a half centuries after Russia’s political “Independence” from Mongol-Tatar Rule. Chapter VIII of this Law Code, comprised of 7 articles and titled “The Redemption of Military Captives”, however, reveals that Muscovite Russia at the mid-17th century was yet suffering from frequent Tatar raids into its populated territory. The raids were to capture Russian people and sell them as slaves. Because of this situation, the Muscovite government was forced to create a special annual tax (poronianichnyi zbor) to prepare a financial fund needed for ransoming Russian captive-slaves from the Tatars.1 Chapter VIII, article 1 imposes an annual levy on the common people of all Russia: 8 dengi per household for town people as well as church peasants; 4 dengi for other peasants; and 2 dengi for lower service men. On the other hand, articles 2-7 of this chapter established norms for ransom-payment to the Tatars according to the rank of the Russian captives: for gentry (dvoriane) and lesser gentry (deti boiarskie) twenty rubles per 100 chetvert’ of their service land-estate (pomest’e); for lesser ranks such as Musketeers (strel’tsy),2 Cossacks, townspeople, and peasants a fixed payment from ten to forty rubles each.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkic Languages 161
    Turkic Languages 161 seriously endangered by the UNESCO red book on See also: Arabic; Armenian; Azerbaijanian; Caucasian endangered languages: Gagauz (Moldovan), Crim- Languages; Endangered Languages; Greek, Modern; ean Tatar, Noghay (Nogai), and West-Siberian Tatar Kurdish; Sign Language: Interpreting; Turkic Languages; . Caucasian: Laz (a few hundred thousand speakers), Turkish. Georgian (30 000 speakers), Abkhaz (10 000 speakers), Chechen-Ingush, Avar, Lak, Lezghian (it is unclear whether this is still spoken) Bibliography . Indo-European: Bulgarian, Domari, Albanian, French (a few thousand speakers each), Ossetian Andrews P A & Benninghaus R (1989). Ethnic groups in the Republic of Turkey. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert (a few hundred speakers), German (a few dozen Verlag. speakers), Polish (a few dozen speakers), Ukranian Aydın Z (2002). ‘Lozan Antlas¸masında azınlık statu¨ su¨; (it is unclear whether this is still spoken), and Farklı ko¨kenlilere tanınan haklar.’ In Kabog˘lu I˙ O¨ (ed.) these languages designated as seriously endangered Azınlık hakları (Minority rights). (Minority status in the by the UNESCO red book on endangered lan- Treaty of Lausanne; Rights granted to people of different guages: Romani (20 000–30 000 speakers) and Yid- origin). I˙stanbul: Publication of the Human Rights Com- dish (a few dozen speakers) mission of the I˙stanbul Bar. 209–217. Neo-Aramaic (Afroasiatic): Tu¯ ro¯ yo and Su¯ rit (a C¸ag˘aptay S (2002). ‘Otuzlarda Tu¨ rk milliyetc¸ilig˘inde ırk, dil few thousand speakers each) ve etnisite’ (Race, language and ethnicity in the Turkish . Languages spoken by recent immigrants, refugees, nationalism of the thirties). In Bora T (ed.) Milliyetc¸ilik ˙ ˙ and asylum seekers: Afroasiatic languages: (Nationalism).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ukrainian Weekly, 2020
    INSIDE: l Thousands participate in online protest in Ukraine – page 4 l Ukrainians prohibited from owning land in Crimea – page 7 l Bishop uses social media to connect with U.K. faithful – page 9 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY Published by the Ukrainian National Association Inc., a fraternal non-profit association Vol. LXXXVIII No. 14 THE UKRAINIAN WEEKLY SUNDAY, APRIL 5, 2020 $2.00 NEWS ANALYSIS Verkhovna Rada dismisses two crucial ministers Breakthrough in Ukraine’s and approves their replacements amid pandemic land privatization saga by Bohdan Nahaylo The World Bank and others viewed this ban as an unduly conservative and unwar- KYIV – On March 30 and 31, the ranted impediment to Ukraine realizing its Ukrainian Parliament finally delivered on economic potential. It estimated that the two crucial issues set as preconditions by moratorium has deprived Ukraine’s econo- the International Monetary Fund in order my of billions of dollars in land taxes and for the country to receive financial support investment in agriculture. of up to $8 billion to help offset the effects Furthermore, in May 2018 the European of the coronavirus pandemic and its devas- Court of Human Rights declared that the tating impact on Ukraine’s fragile economy. moratorium on farmland sales violated The first involved the adoption in its first Ukrainians’ human rights as Ukrainian reading of the so-called “banking” or “anti- farmers – an estimated 7 million of them – Kolomoisky” bill named after the notorious because they were not allowed to manage billionaire oligarch who wants to recover their property freely. Ukraine’s largest bank, PrivatBank. It was In 2018, a coalition of 39 companies and nationalized in 2016 after he allegedly over 1,500 agricultural producers peti- embezzled $5.5 billion from it.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Report Submitted by the Russian Federation Pursuant to The
    ACFC/SR/II(2005)003 SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 2 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES (Received on 26 April 2005) MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION REPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PROVISIONS OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Report of the Russian Federation on the progress of the second cycle of monitoring in accordance with Article 25 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities MOSCOW, 2005 2 Table of contents PREAMBLE ..............................................................................................................................4 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................4 2. The legislation of the Russian Federation for the protection of national minorities rights5 3. Major lines of implementation of the law of the Russian Federation and the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities .............................................................15 3.1. National territorial subdivisions...................................................................................15 3.2 Public associations – national cultural autonomies and national public organizations17 3.3 National minorities in the system of federal government............................................18 3.4 Development of Ethnic Communities’ National
    [Show full text]
  • Fifth Periodical Report Presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in Accordance with Article 15 of the Charter
    Strasbourg, 17 November 2017 MIN-LANG (2017) PR 7 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Fifth periodical report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter FINLAND THE FIFTH PERIODIC REPORT BY THE GOVERNMENT OF FINLAND ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES NOVEMBER 2017 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................6 PART I .................................................................................................................................................................7 1. BASIC INFORMATION ON FINNISH POPULATION AND LANGUAGES....................................................................7 1.1. Finnish population according to mother tongue..........................................................................................7 1.2. Administration of population data ..............................................................................................................9 2. SPECIAL STATUS OF THE ÅLAND ISLANDS.............................................................................................................9 3. NUMBER OF SPEAKERS OF REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES IN FINLAND.................................................10 3.1. The numbers of persons speaking a regional or minority language..........................................................10 3.2. Swedish ......................................................................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Black Sea Region in Classical Antiquity 4
    The Northern Black Sea Region by Kerstin Susanne Jobst In historical studies, the Black Sea region is viewed as a separate historical region which has been shaped in particular by vast migration and acculturation processes. Another prominent feature of the region's history is the great diversity of religions and cultures which existed there up to the 20th century. The region is understood as a complex interwoven entity. This article focuses on the northern Black Sea region, which in the present day is primarily inhabited by Slavic people. Most of this region currently belongs to Ukraine, which has been an independent state since 1991. It consists primarily of the former imperial Russian administrative province of Novorossiia (not including Bessarabia, which for a time was administered as part of Novorossiia) and the Crimean Peninsula, including the adjoining areas to the north. The article also discusses how the region, which has been inhabited by Scythians, Sarmatians, Greeks, Romans, Goths, Huns, Khazars, Italians, Tatars, East Slavs and others, fitted into broader geographical and political contexts. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Space of Myths and Legends 3. The Northern Black Sea Region in Classical Antiquity 4. From the Khazar Empire to the Crimean Khanate and the Ottomans 5. Russian Rule: The Region as Novorossiia 6. World War, Revolutions and Soviet Rule 7. From the Second World War until the End of the Soviet Union 8. Summary and Future Perspective 9. Appendix 1. Sources 2. Literature 3. Notes Indices Citation Introduction
    [Show full text]