Changing Views on the Use of Force: The German Position

Stefan Talmon*

Contents 1. Introduction 2. Authorization of the Use of Force by the UN Security Council 2.1. Expanding the Concept of Threats to the Peace 2.2. The New Concept of Revived Authorization 2.2.1. The Bombing of Military Targets in Iraq 2.2.2. The War Against Iraq 3. The Right of Self-Defence 3.1. Expanding the Definition of Armed Attack 3.1.1. Attacks on a State's Outposts and Nationals Abroad 3.1.2. Attacks by Non-State Actors 3.2. Widening the Notion of 'Occurrence' of an Armed Attack 3.2.1. Ongoing Attacks 3.2.2. Imminent and Non-Imminent Attacks 3.3. Retaining the Means of Self-Defence 4. Humanitarian Intervention 5. Military Rescue Operations 6. Self-Help Involving the Use of Force 7. Conclusion

1. Introduction Despite all the talk of multilateralism and , decisions on 'war and peace' are still very much a national affair. Referring to the question of the possible use of force against Iraq, on 13 September 2002 German Chancellor Gerhard Schroder said in the German Parliament, the : "the fundamental existential questions of the German nation will

* Dr., University Lecturer in Public International Law at the University of Oxford and Fellow of St. Anne's College, Oxford. be decided in Berlin and nowhere else."' For a long time, the bitter experience of two devastating world wars shaped 's view on the use of force in such a way that there was general agreement that "war and the use of force must never again have their origin in Germany".2 But in recent years the use of military force is once again being seen "as a means of last resort to solve international conflicts".33 In July 1994, the Federal Constitutional Court unfastened the self-imposed 'constitutional straitjacket' that prevented German armed forces from being deployed outside Germany 44 Since then, the Bundestag has decided on more than 50 occasions whether to send German soldiers abroad.5 Over the last 11 years, Germany has moved from participation in UN operations to full-blown combat operations, with and without authorization by the Security Council.66 It has always been accepted, however, that force may only be used in accordance with international law and, especially but not exclusively, the Charter of the ? According to the German Government, the United Nations is founded on the principle of the prohibition of the use of force, a principle that replaces "the law of the strong with the strength of the law".8 The dual nature of the prohibition of the use of force, both as a Charter principle and a rule of customary international law, was accepted by the German Government9 long before it was spelt out by the International

1 Deutscher Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll (Stenographischer Bericht) (hereinafter BT- PIPr.), 14/253, 13 September 2002, p. 25576 (all translations from German sources are by the author). 2 See the speech by Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel at a ceremony to mark the 25th anniversary of Germany's membership of the United Nations hosted by the German United Nations Association Bonn, 14 September 1998, available at �|··717www.germany- 0 1 |,|·" typ="DEC2" xbd="1030" xhg="182" ybd="1757" yhg="1716" ID="I50.27.1">info.org/relaunch/politics/speeches/091498.html>, last visited 28 May 2005. 3 See the policy statement of Chancellor Schroder in the Bundestag on 'Our responsibility for peace': BT-PIPr. 15/25, 13 February 2003, p. 1876. See also the statement of Foreign Minister at the general meeting of the German Society for Foreign Affairs, 24 November 1999, that "the use of force as a last resort cannot always be avoided", available at �|··717www.germany-info.org/relaunch/politics/ 0 1 |,|·" typ="BWD" xbd="589" xhg="182" ybd="2048" yhg="2008" ID="I50.33.1">speeches/ 12499.html>, last visited 28 May 2005. 4 Bundesverfassungsgericht, Judgment of 12 July 1994, BVerfGE 90, p. 286. 5 See Deutscher Bundestag, Drucksachen (hereinafter BT-Drs.) 15/2742, 23 March 2004, p. 1. 6 For an overview see W. Hermsdorfer, 'Die Auslandseinsatze der Bundesehr', 17 Humanitares Volkerrecht [Hu V] (2004) pp. 17-28. 7 set BT-Drs. 15/2742, 23 March 2004, p. 4. 8 See BT-PIPr. 15/25, 13 February 2003, p. 1876 (Chancellor Schroder). 9 See e.g., BT-PIPr. 10/29, 14 October 1983, p. 1926.