DOCSLIB.ORG

A Recent Bat Survey Reveals Bukit Barisan Selatan Landscape As A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Recent Bat Survey Reveals Bukit Barisan Selatan Landscape As A A Recent Bat Survey Reveals Bukit Barisan Selatan Landscape as a Chiropteran Diversity Hotspot in Sumatra Author(s): Joe Chun-Chia Huang, Elly Lestari Jazdzyk, Meyner Nusalawo, Ibnu Maryanto, Maharadatunkamsi, Sigit Wiantoro, and Tigga Kingston Source: Acta Chiropterologica, 16(2):413-449. Published By: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3161/150811014X687369 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3161/150811014X687369 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Acta Chiropterologica, 16(2): 413–449, 2014 PL ISSN 1508-1109 © Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS doi: 10.3161/150811014X687369 A recent bat survey reveals Bukit Barisan Selatan Landscape as a chiropteran diversity hotspot in Sumatra JOE CHUN-CHIA HUANG1, 2, ELLY LESTARI JAZDZYK3, MEYNER NUSALAWO4, IBNU MARYANTO2, 5, MAHARADATUNKAMSI5, SIGIT WIANTORO2, 5, and TIGGA KINGSTON1, 2, 6 1Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA 2Southeast Asian Bat Conservation Research Unit, Lubbock, TX, USA 3Department of Biology, College of Mathematics and Natural Science, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia 4Wildlife Conservation Society-Indonesian Program, Bogor, Indonesia 5Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia, Bogor, Indonesia 6Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park is one of the last refuges protecting intact forest and a representative mammalian fauna in Sumatra. However, knowledge of bat diversity in the area is limited. From 2010 to 2012, 47 bat species were recorded through a series of surveys in 12 localities within and around the national park. An additional six species from the area were identified from the mammal collection of the Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Indonesia. At least seven of the species reported in this study are new records for Sumatra, including Kerivoula krauensis, K. lenis, K. minuta, Murina rozendaali, Myotis horsfieldii, Myotis cf. borneoensis, and Rhinolophus borneensis/celebensis. Moreover, a finding of two distinct morphs of Chironax melanocephalus coexisting in the study area indicates another possible undescribed species. With 60 species, we consider Bukit Barisan Selatan Landscape to be a Southeast Asian bat diversity hotspot and of critical importance in maintaining bat diversity in Sumatra. Key words: Chiroptera, new record, lowland rainforest, Indonesia, identification keys, coffee agriculture INTRODUCTION collaborative efforts across species’ ranges (Kings - ton, 2010). Over a quarter of the world’s bat species are Indonesia is an archipelago of more than 17,500 found in Southeast Asia, where over 340 spe- islands and hosts the highest reported species rich- cies make up nearly 30% of the mammalian fauna ness of bats for any country in the world, with the re- of the region (Kingston, 2013), and contribute cently-described Thoopterus suhaniahae (Maryan to significantly to species richness and endemism at et al., 2012), revised Myotis bartelsi and Myotis both local and regional levels. For instance, at we beri (Csorba et al., 2014) bringing the count to the local level, over 62 species are known from 221 spe cies (IUCN, 2013, but excluding M. formo - just a three km2 area of lowland dipterocarp rain- sus — see Csorba et al., 2014). Within the archipel- forest in peninsular Malaysia (Kingston et al., ago, Su matra supports the greatest mammalian di- 2003, 2006). At the regional level, more than 70 versity of any island (Suyanto et al., 2002; Sim mons, species have been recorded from the Philippines 2005), but few studies have focused on Sumatra’s (of which 23 are endemic) (Ingle and Heaney, chiropteran diversity. Van Strien (1996) reviewed 1992; Esselstyn, 2007), 96 species from the island publications on Sumatra’s mammal fauna and gen- of Borneo (Stru e big et al., 2010), and 119 from erated the first checklist for Sumatran bats and re- Thailand (Bum rungsri et al., 2006). Moreover, ported 65 species. Another 16 species were later 7% of South east Asia’s species have been describ- suggested for Sumatra and nearby offshore islands ed since 2000 (Kingston, 2013), and species discov- (Suyanto et al., 1998, 2002; Simmons, 2005; Boi - ery rates are likely to remain high, particularly tani et al., 2006). However, the 80 species cur rently with greater use of molecular techniques (e.g., recognized for the island is likely an underestimate Francis et al., 2010; Khan et al., 2010), and as prior survey work did not deploy harp traps which 414 J. C.-C. Huang, E. L. Jazdzyk, M. Nusalawo, I. Maryanto, Maharadatunkamsi, et al. are particularly effective at capturing species of MATERIALS AND METHODS Hipposide ridae, Rhino lophidae, Kerivoulinae, and Murininae in forest habitats (Kingston et al., 2003). Study Area and Localities Lack of an identification key to Sumatra’s bats may also have hampered inventory efforts. In addition, Bats were surveyed in 12 localities in and around Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park (BBSNP), Lampung Province, samples from Sumatra were unavailable for several Indonesia. Two sites were in the primary forest of BBSNP, one recent regional revisions of bat taxa that have clari- in disturbed forest, five sites were dominated by polyculture fied taxonomic boundaries and species distributions coffee plantations, and two by monoculture coffee plantations. elsewhere (e.g., Campbell et al., 2004; Khan et al., We also surveyed one cave outside the park in a stream valley 2010; Murray et al., 2012). surrounded by disturbed forest and polyculture coffee planta- Sumatra has the greatest deforestation rate in tions. Collectively we refer to these sites at the Bukit Barisan Selatan Landscape (BBSL). Surveys were conducted from July Indonesia (Holmes, 2002). With an average de- to August 2010, July to September 2011, and February to June forestation of 542,000 ha per year between 1985 to 2012. 2008, Sumatra lost around 70% of its forest cover Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park (Fig. 1), with an area of by 2010 (WWF, 2010; Margono et al., 2012). Most 3,240 km2, is the third largest protected area in Sumatra. forest remnants are along the Barisan mountain BBSNP was first gazetted by the government of the Dutch East Indies as a natural reserve (South Sumatra I Natural Reserve) in ridge in the western part of the island and in the peat 1935 and then as a national park by the Indonesian government lands in the east (WWF, 2010). However, to date, re- in 1982 (Levan et al., 2012). Although encroachment precipi- search and conservation efforts on the mammals of tated the loss or degradation of c. 28% of the natural forest by the Barisan mountain area have focused mostly on 2004, the park remains one of the last refuges with intact Su - charismatic ‘flagship species’, such as the Sumatran matran lowland rainforest and supports more than 450 terrestrial vertebrate species, including 90 mammal species (WWF, 2007). tiger (Panthera tigris sumatrae), Sumatran ele phant With more than 750 plant species (WWF, 2007), forests of (Elephas maximus sumatranus), Sumatran rhino- BBSNP are dominated by Dipterocarpaceae, Lauraceae, Myrta - ceros (Dicerorhinus sumatrensis), and Suma tran ceae, Annonaceae, and Fagaceae tree species (UNESCO, 2004). orang utan (Pongo abelii) (WWF, 2007, 2010). Few Based on floristic compositions and elevation ranges, the park data are available on the diversity and distribution of can be divided into five natural habitats, including coastal forest the small mammals, including bats, in the area. (1% of total park area, near sea level), lowland rainforest (45%, 0–600 m a.s.l.), highland forest (34%, 600–1,000 m a.s.l.), sub- In the present study, we focused on the bat fauna montane forest (17%, 1,000–1,500 m a.s.l.), and montane forest in and around Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park (3%, 1,500–c. 2,000 m a.s.l.) (UNESCO, 2004). (BBSNP) of southwestern Sumatra. BBSNP together with Gunung Leuser National Park and Kerinci Forest localities Seblat National Park is a World Heritage Site — The Sukabanjar Forest (4°56’24”S, 103°53’24”E) — The forest Tropical Rainforest Heritage of Sumatra (TRHS), is located between the eastern border of the middle section of designated to highlight the rainforest and biodiver- Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park (BBSNP) and Lake Ranau. The vegetation is a disturbed forest mixed with bamboo stands sity of Sumatra (UNESCO, 2004). We selected along a small stream with an elevation of 704–1033 m a.s.l. BBSNP for our surveys because bat species richness It is the extension of the forest of BBSNP but managed by the of paleotropical wet mountains usually peak at ele- local community of Sukabanjar Village (Site 7, see below). Tim - vations less than 1,000 m a.s.l. (McCain, 2007), and ber is frequently harvested by villagers for local use. of the three national parks of TRHS, BBSNP is the Sukaraja Forest (5°31’48”S, 104°27’35”E) — Sukaraja For - only lower elevation site, with 80% of the area est is located in the southeastern section of BBSNP. Bats were trapped along a 1.5-km trail used for monitoring large mammals under 1,000 m a.s.l.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 18 September 2014
    Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 18 September 2014 List of Recent Land Mammals of Mexico, 2014 José Ramírez-Pulido, Noé González-Ruiz, Alfred L. Gardner, and Joaquín Arroyo-Cabrales.0 Front cover: Image of the cover of Nova Plantarvm, Animalivm et Mineralivm Mexicanorvm Historia, by Francisci Hernández et al. (1651), which included the first list of the mammals found in Mexico. Cover image courtesy of the John Carter Brown Library at Brown University. SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS Museum of Texas Tech University Number 63 List of Recent Land Mammals of Mexico, 2014 JOSÉ RAMÍREZ-PULIDO, NOÉ GONZÁLEZ-RUIZ, ALFRED L. GARDNER, AND JOAQUÍN ARROYO-CABRALES Layout and Design: Lisa Bradley Cover Design: Image courtesy of the John Carter Brown Library at Brown University Production Editor: Lisa Bradley Copyright 2014, Museum of Texas Tech University This publication is available free of charge in PDF format from the website of the Natural Sciences Research Laboratory, Museum of Texas Tech University (nsrl.ttu.edu). The authors and the Museum of Texas Tech University hereby grant permission to interested parties to download or print this publication for personal or educational (not for profit) use. Re-publication of any part of this paper in other works is not permitted without prior written permission of the Museum of Texas Tech University. This book was set in Times New Roman and printed on acid-free paper that meets the guidelines for per- manence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources. Printed: 18 September 2014 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Special Publications of the Museum of Texas Tech University, Number 63 Series Editor: Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Species in One: Multigene Analyses Reveal Phylogenetic
    Published by Associazione Teriologica Italiana Volume 29 (1): 111–121, 2018 Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy Available online at: http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it doi:10.4404/hystrix–00017-2017 Research Article Four species in one: multigene analyses reveal phylogenetic patterns within Hardwicke’s woolly bat, Kerivoula hardwickii-complex (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in Asia Vuong Tan Tu1,2,3,4,∗, Alexandre Hassanin1,2,∗, Neil M. Furey5, Nguyen Truong Son3,4, Gábor Csorba6 1Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), UMR 7205 MNHN CNRS UPMC, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Case postale N°51–55, rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France 2Service de Systématique Moléculaire, UMS 2700, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Case postale N°26–43, rue Cuvier, 75005 Paris, France 3Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet road, Cau Giay district, Hanoi, Vietnam 4Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet road, Cau Giay district, Hanoi, Vietnam 5Fauna & Flora International, Cambodia Programme, 19 Street 360, Boeng Keng Kang 1, Chamkarmorn, Phnom Penh, Cambodia 6Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Baross u. 13., H-1088, Budapest, Hungary Keywords: Abstract Kerivoulinae Asia We undertook a comparative phylogeographic study using molecular, morphological and morpho- phylogeography metric approaches to address systematic issues in bats of the Kerivoula hardwickii complex in Asia. taxonomy Our phylogenetic reconstructions using DNA sequences of two mitochondrial and seven nuclear cryptic species genes reveal a distinct clade containing four small-sized species (K. hardwickii sensu stricto, K. depressa, K. furva and Kerivoula sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Figs1 ML Tree.Pdf
    100 Megaderma lyra Rhinopoma hardwickei 71 100 Rhinolophus creaghi 100 Rhinolophus ferrumequinum 100 Hipposideros armiger Hipposideros commersoni 99 Megaerops ecaudatus 85 Megaerops niphanae 100 Megaerops kusnotoi 100 Cynopterus sphinx 98 Cynopterus horsfieldii 69 Cynopterus brachyotis 94 50 Ptenochirus minor 86 Ptenochirus wetmorei Ptenochirus jagori Dyacopterus spadiceus 99 Sphaerias blanfordi 99 97 Balionycteris maculata 100 Aethalops alecto 99 Aethalops aequalis Thoopterus nigrescens 97 Alionycteris paucidentata 33 99 Haplonycteris fischeri 29 Otopteropus cartilagonodus Latidens salimalii 43 88 Penthetor lucasi Chironax melanocephalus 90 Syconycteris australis 100 Macroglossus minimus 34 Macroglossus sobrinus 92 Boneia bidens 100 Harpyionycteris whiteheadi 69 Harpyionycteris celebensis Aproteles bulmerae 51 Dobsonia minor 100 100 80 Dobsonia inermis Dobsonia praedatrix 99 96 14 Dobsonia viridis Dobsonia peronii 47 Dobsonia pannietensis 56 Dobsonia moluccensis 29 Dobsonia anderseni 100 Scotonycteris zenkeri 100 Casinycteris ophiodon 87 Casinycteris campomaanensis Casinycteris argynnis 99 100 Eonycteris spelaea 100 Eonycteris major Eonycteris robusta 100 100 Rousettus amplexicaudatus 94 Rousettus spinalatus 99 Rousettus leschenaultii 100 Rousettus aegyptiacus 77 Rousettus madagascariensis 87 Rousettus obliviosus Stenonycteris lanosus 100 Megaloglossus woermanni 100 91 Megaloglossus azagnyi 22 Myonycteris angolensis 100 87 Myonycteris torquata 61 Myonycteris brachycephala 33 41 Myonycteris leptodon Myonycteris relicta 68 Plerotes anchietae
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny of Mobatviruses (Hantaviridae) in Myanmar and Vietnam
    viruses Article Molecular Phylogeny of Mobatviruses (Hantaviridae) in Myanmar and Vietnam Satoru Arai 1, Fuka Kikuchi 1,2, Saw Bawm 3 , Nguyễn Trường Sơn 4,5, Kyaw San Lin 6, Vương Tân Tú 4,5, Keita Aoki 1,7, Kimiyuki Tsuchiya 8, Keiko Tanaka-Taya 1, Shigeru Morikawa 9, Kazunori Oishi 1 and Richard Yanagihara 10,* 1 Infectious Disease Surveillance Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan; [email protected] (S.A.); [email protected] (F.K.); [email protected] (K.A.); [email protected] (K.T.-T.); [email protected] (K.O.) 2 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan 3 Department of Pharmacology and Parasitology, University of Veterinary Science, Yezin, Nay Pyi Taw 15013, Myanmar; [email protected] 4 Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam; [email protected] (N.T.S.); [email protected] (V.T.T.) 5 Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam 6 Department of Aquaculture and Aquatic Disease, University of Veterinary Science, Yezin, Nay Pyi Taw 15013, Myanmar; [email protected] 7 Department of Liberal Arts, Faculty of Science, Tokyo University of Science, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan 8 Laboratory of Bioresources, Applied Biology Co., Ltd., Tokyo 107-0062, Japan; [email protected] 9 Department of Veterinary Science, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan; [email protected] 10 Pacific Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases Research, John A.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Taiwan and Adjacent China
    Zootaxa 3920 (1): 301–342 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3920.2.6 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8B991675-0C48-40D4-87D2-DACA524D17C2 Molecular phylogeny and morphological revision of Myotis bats (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) from Taiwan and adjacent China MANUEL RUEDI1,5, GÁBOR CSORBA2, LIANG- KONG LIN3 & CHENG-HAN CHOU3,4 1Department of Mammalogy and Ornithology, Natural History Museum of Geneva, Route de Malagnou 1, BP 6434, 1211 Geneva (6), Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Baross u. 13., H-1088. E-mail: [email protected] 3Laboratory of Wildlife Ecology, Department of Biology, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan 407, R.O.C. E-mail: [email protected] 4Division of Zoology, Endemic Species Research Institute, Nantou, Taiwan 552, R.O.C. E-mail: [email protected] 5Corresponding author Table of contents Abstract . 301 Introduction . 302 Material and methods . 310 Results . 314 Discussion . 319 Systematic account . 319 Submyotodon latirostris (Kishida, 1932) . 319 Myotis fimbriatus (Peters, 1870) . 321 Myotis laniger (Peters, 1870) . 322 Myotis secundus sp. n. 324 Myotis soror sp. n. 327 Myotis frater Allen, 1923 . 331 Myotis formosus (Hodgson, 1835) . 334 Myotis rufoniger (Tomes, 1858) . 335 Biogeography and conclusions . 336 Key to the Myotinae from Taiwan and adjacent mainland China . 337 Acknowledgments . 337 References . 338 Abstract In taxonomic accounts, three species of Myotis have been traditionally reported to occur on the island of Taiwan: Watase’s bat (M.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Count 2003
    BAT COUNT 2003 Working to promote the long term, sustainable conservation of globally threatened flying foxes in the Philippines, by developing baseline population information, increasing public awareness, and training students and protected area managers in field monitoring techniques. 1 A Terminal Report Submitted by Tammy Mildenstein1, Apolinario B. Cariño2, and Samuel Stier1 1Fish and Wildlife Biology, University of Montana, USA 2Silliman University and Mt. Talinis – Twin Lakes Federation of People’s Organizations, Diputado Extension, Sibulan, Negros Oriental, Philippines Photo by: Juan Pablo Moreiras 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Large flying foxes in insular Southeast Asia are the most threatened of the Old World fruit bats due to deforestation, unregulated hunting, and little conservation commitment from local governments. Despite the fact they are globally endangered and play essential ecological roles in forest regeneration as seed dispersers and pollinators, there have been only a few studies on these bats that provide information useful to their conservation management. Our project aims to promote the conservation of large flying foxes in the Philippines by providing protected area managers with the training and the baseline information necessary to design and implement a long-term management plan for flying foxes. We focused our efforts on the globally endangered Philippine endemics, Acerodon jubatus and Acerodon leucotis, and the bats that commonly roost with them, Pteropus hypomelanus, P. vampyrus lanensis, and P. pumilus which are thought to be declining in the Philippines. Local participation is an integral part of our project. We conducted the first national training workshop on flying fox population counts and conservation at the Subic Bay area.
    [Show full text]
  • Karyotype Evolution in the Horseshoe Bat Rhinolophus Sedulus by Whole-Arm Reciprocal Translocation (WART)
    Original Article Cytogenet Genome Res 2014;143:241–250 Accepted: May 5, 2014 DOI: 10.1159/000365824 by M. Schmid Published online: August 16, 2014 Karyotype Evolution in the Horseshoe Bat Rhinolophus sedulus by Whole-Arm Reciprocal Translocation (WART) a b d c Marianne Volleth Klaus-Gerhard Heller Hoi-Sen Yong Stefan Müller a b Department of Human Genetics, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg , Department of Biology, Humboldt c University, Berlin , and Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich , d Germany; Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur , Malaysia Key Words tence of a hybrid zone at the sampling locality is thought to Chiroptera · FISH · Karyotype evolution · Mammalia · be rather improbable, the WART may indicate ongoing Rhinolophidae · WART karyotype evolution in this taxon. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel Abstract Robertsonian (centric) fusion or fission is one of the predom- Karyotypes may be shaped by different kinds of rear- inant modes of chromosomal rearrangement in karyotype rangements, such as inversions, translocations, and Rob- evolution among mammals. However, in karyotypes com- ertsonian (centric) fissions and fusions. The last type is posed of only bi-armed chromosomes, creation of new chro- thought to be the most common mode within Mammalia, mosomal arm combinations in one step is possible only via at least among rearrangements detected by conventional whole-arm reciprocal translocation (WART). Although this cytogenetic techniques in the past. A relatively rarely re- type of rearrangement has often been proposed to play an ported type of rearrangement is whole-arm reciprocal important role in chromosomal evolution, direct observa- translocation (WART) by which entire chromosomal tions of WARTs remained rare, and, in most cases, were found arms are reciprocally exchanged between 2 chromo- in hybrids of chromosomal races in the genera Mus and somes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae: Kerivoulinae) from Thailand
    A Systematic Review of Kerivoula Gray, 1842 (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae: Kerivoulinae) from Thailand Bounsavane Douangboubpha A Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Prince of Songkla University 2014 Copyright of Prince of Songkla University i A Systematic Review of Kerivoula Gray, 1842 (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae: Kerivoulinae) from Thailand Bounsavane Douangboubpha A Thesis Submitted in Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Prince of Songkla University 2014 Copyright of Prince of Songkla University ii Thesis Title A Systematic Review of Kerivoula Gray, 1842 (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae: Kerivoulinae) from Thailand Author Mr. Bounsavane Douangboubpha Major Program Doctor of Philosophy in Biology Major Advisor Examining Committee …………………………………… …………………………………… (Assist. Prof. Dr. Sara Bumrungsri) (Dr. Yodchaiy Chuaynkern) …………………………………… Co-advisor (Assist. Prof. Dr. Sara Bumrungsri) …………………………………… …………………………………… (Dr. Paul J. J. Bates) (Dr. Paul J. J. Bates) …………………………………… …………………………………… (Assoc. Prof. Dr. Chutamas Satasook) (Assist. Prof. Dr. Warapond Wanna) …………………………………… …………………………………… (Assist. Prof. Dr. Warapond Wanna) (Assist. Prof. Dr. Supiyanit Maiphae) The Graduate School, Prince of Songkla University, has approved this thesis as fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Biology. ………………………………… (Assoc. Prof. Dr. Teerapol Srichana) Dean of Graduate School iii This is to certify that the work here submitted is the result of the candidate’s own investigations. Due acknowledgement has been made of any assistance received. …………………………………… (Assist. Prof. Dr. Sara Bumrungsri) Major Advisor …………………………………… (Mr. Bounsavane Douangboubpha) Candidate iv I hereby certify that this work has not already been accepted in substance for any degree, and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebola, KFD and Bats
    Journal of Communicable Diseases Volume 51, Issue 4 - 2019, Pg. No. 69-72 Peer Reviewed & Open Access Journal Review Article Ebola, KFD and Bats PK Rajagopalan Former Director, Vector Control Research Center, Indian Council of Medical Research and formerly: WHO STAC Member, WHO Consultant and WHO Expert Committee Member on Malaria, Filariasis and Vector Control. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24321/0019.5138.201939 INFO ABSTRACT E-mail Id: The headline in the Times of India, dated July 23, 2019, “India Needs [email protected] to Prepare for Ebola, Other Viral Diseases” was frightening. It quotes Orcid Id: an article in Indian Journal of Medical Research, which states “Bats https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8324-3096 are thought to be the natural reservoirs of this virus…..India is home How to cite this article: to a great diversity of bat species….” But Ebola has not yet come to Rajagopalan PK. Ebola, KFD and Bats. J Commun India, though there is every possibility. But what about Kyasanur Forest Dis 2019; 51(4): 69-72. Disease (KFD), which is already in India and which has links with an insectivorous bat? Recognized in 1957, the virus was isolated in 1969 Date of Submission: 2019-08-22 over fifty years ago from four insectivorous bats, Rhinolophus rouxii, Date of Acceptance: 2019-12-23 and from Ornithodoros ticks collected from the roosting habitat of these bats, (Ind. J. Med. Res, 1969, 905-8). KFD came as a big enough epidemic in 1957, but later petered out and then sporadically appeared throughout the Western Ghat region, from Kerala to Gujarat and an epidemic resurfacing in the oldest theater in January 2019! There were many publications in India about investigations done in these areas, but none of them mentioned anything about bats.
    [Show full text]
  • Bats As Bushmeat: a Global Review S Imon M Ickleburgh,Kerry W Aylen and P Aul R Acey
    Review Bats as bushmeat: a global review S imon M ickleburgh,Kerry W aylen and P aul R acey Abstract A questionnaire survey and literature review on bats. There is some evidence that hunting and trade is revealed the extent of hunting of bats for bushmeat in having a significant impact on bat populations in the Pacific the Old World tropics. High levels of offtake were reported islands and South-East Asia (Mickleburgh et al., 2002) and throughout Asia, the Pacific islands and some Western also in Madagascar (Jenkins & Racey, 2008) but there is no Indian Ocean islands, where fruit bats of the genus overall view of its potential global impact on bats. Further- Pteropus are eaten extensively. Most hunting in Africa was more, recent reviews of emergent viral diseases in bats have reported in western states and the largest fruit bat Eidolon raised concerns that eating bats as bushmeat may transmit helvum was preferred. Insectivorous bats are also eaten, such diseases (Messenger et al., 2003). particularly Tadarida in Asia. Hunting is both for local The low reproductive rate of bats makes them especially consumption and commercial, sometimes involving cross- vulnerable to harvesting for bushmeat. In several life-history border transactions. The high levels of hunting reported characteristics bats are similar to primates that are severely and the low reproductive rate of bats indicate there are impacted by the bushmeat trade (Bowen-Jones & Pendry, likely to be severe negative effects on bat populations, and 1999). Bats are long-lived and often roost communally, declines of several species are documented. Although there which increases their visibility and susceptibility to hunters.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats
    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Mammals of South-East Asia
    A Checklist of the Mammals of South-east Asia A Checklist of the Mammals of South-east Asia PHOLIDOTA Pangolin (Manidae) 1 Sunda Pangolin (Manis javanica) 2 Chinese Pangolin (Manis pentadactyla) INSECTIVORA Gymnures (Erinaceidae) 3 Moonrat (Echinosorex gymnurus) 4 Short-tailed Gymnure (Hylomys suillus) 5 Chinese Gymnure (Hylomys sinensis) 6 Large-eared Gymnure (Hylomys megalotis) Moles (Talpidae) 7 Slender Shrew-mole (Uropsilus gracilis) 8 Kloss's Mole (Euroscaptor klossi) 9 Large Chinese Mole (Euroscaptor grandis) 10 Long-nosed Chinese Mole (Euroscaptor longirostris) 11 Small-toothed Mole (Euroscaptor parvidens) 12 Blyth's Mole (Parascaptor leucura) 13 Long-tailed Mole (Scaptonyx fuscicauda) Shrews (Soricidae) 14 Lesser Stripe-backed Shrew (Sorex bedfordiae) 15 Myanmar Short-tailed Shrew (Blarinella wardi) 16 Indochinese Short-tailed Shrew (Blarinella griselda) 17 Hodgson's Brown-toothed Shrew (Episoriculus caudatus) 18 Bailey's Brown-toothed Shrew (Episoriculus baileyi) 19 Long-taied Brown-toothed Shrew (Episoriculus macrurus) 20 Lowe's Brown-toothed Shrew (Chodsigoa parca) 21 Van Sung's Shrew (Chodsigoa caovansunga) 22 Mole Shrew (Anourosorex squamipes) 23 Himalayan Water Shrew (Chimarrogale himalayica) 24 Styan's Water Shrew (Chimarrogale styani) Page 1 of 17 Database: Gehan de Silva Wijeyeratne, www.jetwingeco.com A Checklist of the Mammals of South-east Asia 25 Malayan Water Shrew (Chimarrogale hantu) 26 Web-footed Water Shrew (Nectogale elegans) 27 House Shrew (Suncus murinus) 28 Pygmy White-toothed Shrew (Suncus etruscus) 29 South-east
    [Show full text]