Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A. macklotii) Alcathoe Bat 954 Andersen’s Slit-faced Bat 384 Arcuate Horseshoe Bat 319 acetabulosus, Mormopterus 619, 622 Alcathoe Myotis 954 anderseni, Artibeus 578 Arcuate Tent-making Bat 557 achates, Taphozous 346, 354 Alcathoe Whiskered Bat 954 anderseni, Dobsonia 109 arcuatus, Rhinolophus 319 achilles, Rhinolophus 305 Alcathoe Whiskered Myotis 954 andersoni, Eptesicus pachyomus 850 Ardops 580 acityae, Pteropus personatus 136 alcathoe, Myotis 954 andinus, Eptesicus 844 arenarius, Miniopterus 704 acrodonta, Mirimiri 60, 126 alcyone, Rhinolophus 269, 281 andreinii, Rhinolophus blasii 283 arge, Eptesicus brasiliensis 845 acrotis, Rhinolophus clivosus 296 Aldabra Flying Fox 159 Andrew Rebori’s House Bat 889 arge, Nycteris 374, 383 Acuminate Horseshoe Bat 265, 310 aldabrensis, Pteropus 159 Andrew Rebori’s Yellow Bat 889 argentata, Glauconycteris 832 acuminatus, Rhinolophus 265, 310 alecto, Aethalops 20, 74 andrewreborii, Scotophilus 889 argentata, Kerivoula 904 Adam’s Horseshoe Bat 281 alecto, Cyttarops 338, 367 anetianus, Pteropus 150 Argentine Brown Bat 845 adami, Rhinolophus 281 alecto, Emballonura 359 Angel’s Yellow-shouldered Bat 550 Argentine Serotine 845 Adams’s Pipistrelle 783 alecto, Pteropus 144 angeli, Sturnira 550 Argentinian Brown Bat 845 adamsi, Pipistrellus 783 alethina, Rhinophylla 539 Angolan Epauletted Fruit Bat 97 argentinus, Lasiurus ega 882 admiralitatum, Pteropus 142 alienus, Histiotus 841 Angolan Free-tailed Bat 653 argynnis, Casinycteris 23, 82 Admiralty Flying Fox 142 Alionycteris 75 Angolan Fruit Bat 28, 91 Ariel Pipistrelle 809 Adriana’s Yellow-shouldered Bat 545 alitonus, Pteronotus 431, 443 Angolan Hairy Bat 710, 711, 714 ariel, Hypsugo 809 adrianae, Sturnira 545 Allen’s Big-eared Bat 733, 872 Angolan Long-eared Bat 825 ariel, Plecotus 868 adversus, Myotis 969 Allen’s Butterfly Bat 833 Angolan Mops Bat 653 ariel, Pteropus medius 157 aegyptiaca, Tadarida 665 Allen’s Common Mustached Bat 442 Angolan Rousette 28, 91 Arielulus 827 aegyptiacus, Rousettus 25, 50, 87 Allen’s Horseshoe Bat 301 Angolan Soft-furred Fruit Bat 28, 91 Ariteus 580 Aellen’s Bent-winged Bat 706 Allen’s Mastiff Bat 627 Angolan Wing-gland Bat 710, 711, 714 Arizona Myotis 929 Aellen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 226, 245 Allen’s Mustached Bat 442 angolensis, Epomophorus 97 armiger, Hipposideros 214, 237 Aellen’s Long-fingered Bat 706 Allen’s Spotted Bat 833 angolensis, Laephotis 825 Arnhem Leaf-nosed Bat 242 Aellen’s Pipistrelle 776 Allen’s Striped Bat 833 angolensis, Lissonycteris 28, 91 Arnhem Roundleaf Bat 242 Aellen’s Pipistrelle Bat 776 Allen’s Yellow Bat 859 angolensis, Neoromicia grandidieri 823 Arnhem Sheath-tailed Bat 354 Aellen’s Roundleaf Bat 226, 245 alleni, Rhogeessa 859 Angulate Pipistrelle 782 Arnhem Tomb Bat 354 aelleni, Miniopterus 706 Aloe Bat 820 angulatus, Cynopterus sphinx 64 arnhemensis, Nyctophilus 805 aello, Nyctimene 117 Aloe Serotine 820 angulatus, Pipistrellus 782 Artful Long-eared Bat 802 aenea, Murina 916 Aloe Serotine Bat 820 angustifolius, Rhinolophus arcuatus 319 Artibeus aenea, Rhogeessa 857 alongensis, Hipposideros 237 angustirostris, Platyrrhinus 565 Dark 574 aenobarbus, Nycticeius 892 alorensis, Acerodon macklotii 135 Anjouan Myotis 953 Fraternal 571 aequalis, Aethalops 73 aloysiisabaudiae, Chaerephon 645 anjouanensis, Myotis 953 Fringed-lipped 572 aequatorialis, Artibeus 572 Alpine Long-eared Bat 869 Anna Tess’s Bat 957 Giant 575 aequatorianus, Cabreramops 638 altarium, Myotis 956 Anna Tess’s Myotis 957 Great 472, 575 aequatoris, Anoura 519 alticolus, Rhinolophus 287 Annam Tube-nosed Bat 915 Jamaican 481, 573 Aerial Pipistrelle Bat 776 alticraniatus, Myotis siligorensis 966 Annamit Myotis 965 Spix’s 465, 576 aero, Pipistrellus 776 altilis, Scotophilus 888 Annamite Tube-nosed Bat 915 Artibeus 571 aerosus, Phoniscus 895 altitudinis, Cynopterus brachyotis 65 Annamite Water Bat 965 Aru Flying Fox 161 Aethalops 73 Alvarez’s Free-tailed Bat 624 annamitica, Murina 915 aruensis, Hipposideros ater 249 aethiops, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alvarez’s Mastiff Bat 624 annamiticus, Myotis 965 aruensis, Pteropus 161 afer, Triaenops 197, 201, 202, 206 alvarezi, Molossus 624 annatessae, Myotis 957 aruensis, Rhinolophus euryotis 318 affinis, Hypsugo 812 alvenslebeni, Scotophilus nigrita 889 annectans, Myotis 961 aruma, Phyllostomus hastatus 507 affinis, Lavia frons 190 Amazonian Common Mustached annectens, Pteropus hypomelanus 143 Asellia 229 affinis, Noctilio albiventris 411 Bat 431, 443 annobonense, Eidolon helvum 115 Aselliscus 234 affinis, Rhinolophus 264, 320 Amazonian Mustached Bat 431, 443 Anoura 519 Aselliscus dongbacana (see A.
Recommended publications
  • Artibeus Jamaicensis) with Tacaribe Virus Ann C
    University of Northern Colorado Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC Dissertations Student Research 8-1-2011 Experimental infection of Jamaican fruit bats (Artibeus jamaicensis) with Tacaribe virus Ann C. Hawkinson Follow this and additional works at: http://digscholarship.unco.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Hawkinson, Ann C., "Experimental infection of Jamaican fruit bats (Artibeus jamaicensis) with Tacaribe virus" (2011). Dissertations. Paper 150. This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO Greeley, Colorado The Graduate School Experimental Infection of Jamaican Fruit Bats (Artibeus jamaicensis) With Tacaribe Virus A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Ann C. Hawkinson College of Natural Health Sciences School of Biological Sciences Biological Education August 2011 This Dissertation by: Ann C. Hawkinson Entitled: Experimental infection of Jamaican fruit bats (Artibeus jamaicensis) with Tacaribe virus has been approved as meeting the requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in College of Natural Health Sciences, in School of Biological Sciences, Program of Biological Education Accepted by the Doctoral Committee William A. Schountz, Ph.D., Chair Susan M. Keenan, Ph.D., Committee Member Rick A. Adams, Ph.D., Committee Member Steven Pulos, Ph.D., Faculty Representative Date of Dissertation Defense Accepted by the Graduate School Robbyn R. Wacker, Ph.D. Assistant Vice President for Research Dean of the Graduate School & International Admissions ABSTRACT Hawkinson, Ann C.
    [Show full text]
  • A Recent Bat Survey Reveals Bukit Barisan Selatan Landscape As A
    A Recent Bat Survey Reveals Bukit Barisan Selatan Landscape as a Chiropteran Diversity Hotspot in Sumatra Author(s): Joe Chun-Chia Huang, Elly Lestari Jazdzyk, Meyner Nusalawo, Ibnu Maryanto, Maharadatunkamsi, Sigit Wiantoro, and Tigga Kingston Source: Acta Chiropterologica, 16(2):413-449. Published By: Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3161/150811014X687369 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3161/150811014X687369 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Acta Chiropterologica, 16(2): 413–449, 2014 PL ISSN 1508-1109 © Museum and Institute of Zoology PAS doi: 10.3161/150811014X687369 A recent
    [Show full text]
  • Food Choice in Frugivorous Bats
    Food Choice in Frugivorous Bats Lauren Riegler Department of Biology, Trinity University ABSTRACT Frugivorous bats are important dispersers for many tropical plants and their conservation depends on furthering knowledge in their foraging behaviors and food preferences (Brosset et al. 1996). This study investigated a possible fruit preference of five frugivorous bat species (Carollia brevicauda, Artibeus lituratus, Artibeus jamaicensis, Artibeus toltecus and Platyrrhinus vittatus) found in Monteverde, Costa Rica among three wild fruit species (Solanum umbellatum, Solanum aphyodendron and Ficus pertusa) and two cultivated fruit species (Musa accuminata and Carica papaya). Fruits were presented to the bats in the Bat Jungle of Monteverde, where the foraging of bats can be closely observed. Artibeus toltecus showed a slight trend of preference for Solanum umbellatum over Solanum aphyodendron. However, due to small sample size and pseudoreplication there was no significant preference for any of the fruits by any of the bat species. RESUMEN Los murciélagos frugívoros son dispersores importantes de muchas plantas tropicales y su conservación depende del incremento de nuestro conocimiento de su comportamiento de forrajeo y preferencias dietéticas (Brosset et al. 1996). Este estudio investigó la posible predilección de cinco murciélagos frugívoros (Carollia brevicauda, Artibeus lituratus, Artibeus jamaicensis, Artibeus toltecus y Platyrrhinus vittatus) por tres especies silvestres de frutas Solanum umbellatum, Solanum aphyodendron y Ficus pertusa) y dos especies de frutas cultivadas (Musa accuminata y Carica papaya) en Monteverde, Costa Rica. Las frutas fueron presentadas a los murciélagos en la Jungla de Murciélagos de Monteverde, donde fue posible observar detenidamente el compartimiento de los murciélagos. Artibeus toltecus mostró una tendencia leve de preferencia por Solanum umbellatum.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Artibeus Jamaicensis</I>
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Mammalogy Papers: University of Nebraska State Museum Museum, University of Nebraska State 6-1-2007 Phylogenetics and Phylogeography of the Artibeus jamaicensis Complex Based on Cytochrome-b DNA Sequences Peter A. Larsen Texas Tech University, [email protected] Steven R. Hoofer Matthew C. Bozeman Scott C. Pedersen South Dakota State University, [email protected] Hugh H. Genoways University of Nebraska - Lincoln, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/museummammalogy Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Molecular Genetics Commons, and the Zoology Commons Larsen, Peter A.; Hoofer, Steven R.; Bozeman, Matthew C.; Pedersen, Scott C.; Genoways, Hugh H.; Phillips, Carleton J.; Pumo, Dorothy E.; and Baker, Robert J., "Phylogenetics and Phylogeography of the Artibeus jamaicensis Complex Based on Cytochrome-b DNA Sequences" (2007). Mammalogy Papers: University of Nebraska State Museum. 53. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/museummammalogy/53 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum, University of Nebraska State at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mammalogy Papers: University of Nebraska State Museum by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Peter A. Larsen, Steven R. Hoofer, Matthew C. Bozeman, Scott C. Pedersen, Hugh H. Genoways, Carleton J. Phillips, Dorothy E. Pumo, and Robert J. Baker This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ museummammalogy/53 Journal of Mammalogy, 88(3):712–727, 2007 PHYLOGENETICS AND PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF THE ARTIBEUS JAMAICENSIS COMPLEX BASED ON CYTOCHROME-b DNA SEQUENCES PETER A.
    [Show full text]
  • Bats of Nepal a Field Guide/ /Bats of Nepal a Field Guide
    Bats of Nepal A field guide/ /Bats of Nepal A field guide This Publication is supported by: Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) - World Wildlife Fund WWF Nepal Designed and published by: Small Mammals Conservation and Research Foundation (SMCRF) Compiled and edited by: Pushpa Raj Acharya, Hari Adhikari, Sagar Dahal, Arjun Thapa and Sanjan Thapa Cover photographs: Front cover: Myotis sicarius Mandelli's Mouse-eared Myotis by Sanjan Thapa Back cover: Myotis csorbai Csorba's Mouse-eared Myotis by Sanjan Thapa Cover design: Rajesh Goit First edition 2010 500 copies ISBN 978-9937-2-2951-7 Copyright © 2010 all rights reserved at authors and SMCRF No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or copied in any form-printed, electronic and photocopied without the written Bats of Nepal permission from the publisher. A field guide Bats of Nepal A field guide/ /Bats of Nepal A field guide forts which strategically put their attention to bat research though we were less experienced and trained. Meanwhile, Bat researches were simultaneously PREFACE supported by international agencies: Bat Conservation International, Lubee Bat Conservancy, Rufford small grants and Chester Zoo. Inconsistent database advocates around 60 species of bat hosted to Nepalese land- scape. Our knowledge on bat fauna is merely based on opportunistic and rare A picture can speak thousand words, we have tried to include maximum pho- effort carried out by foreign scholars bounded with countries biological policy. tographs of the species (about 40 photographs); Most of the bat pictures used in Almost 40 years of biodiversity effort of Nepal, Small mammals has got no re- this book were clicked during different field studies in Nepal.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B References
    Final Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement and Preliminary Section 4(f) Evaluation Appendix B, References July 2021 Federal Aid No. 999-M(161)S ADOT Project No. 999 SW 0 M5180 01P I-11 Corridor Final Tier 1 EIS Appendix B, References 1 This page intentionally left blank. July 2021 Project No. M5180 01P / Federal Aid No. 999-M(161)S I-11 Corridor Final Tier 1 EIS Appendix B, References 1 ADEQ. 2002. Groundwater Protection in Arizona: An Assessment of Groundwater Quality and 2 the Effectiveness of Groundwater Programs A.R.S. §49-249. Arizona Department of 3 Environmental Quality. 4 ADEQ. 2008. Ambient Groundwater Quality of the Pinal Active Management Area: A 2005-2006 5 Baseline Study. Open File Report 08-01. Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Water 6 Quality Division, Phoenix, Arizona. June 2008. 7 https://legacy.azdeq.gov/environ/water/assessment/download/pinal_ofr.pdf. 8 ADEQ. 2011. Arizona State Implementation Plan: Regional Haze Under Section 308 of the 9 Federal Regional Haze Rule. Air Quality Division, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 10 Phoenix, Arizona. January 2011. https://www.resolutionmineeis.us/documents/adeq-sip- 11 regional-haze-2011. 12 ADEQ. 2013a. Ambient Groundwater Quality of the Upper Hassayampa Basin: A 2003-2009 13 Baseline Study. Open File Report 13-03, Phoenix: Water Quality Division. 14 https://legacy.azdeq.gov/environ/water/assessment/download/upper_hassayampa.pdf. 15 ADEQ. 2013b. Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Fact Sheet: Construction 16 General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity. Arizona 17 Department of Environmental Quality. June 3, 2013. 18 https://static.azdeq.gov/permits/azpdes/cgp_fact_sheet_2013.pdf.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Watching in Northern Mexico Vladimir Dinets
    Mammal watching in Northern Mexico Vladimir Dinets Seldom visited by mammal watchers, Northern Mexico is a fascinating part of the world with a diverse mammal fauna. In addition to its many endemics, many North American species are easier to see here than in USA, while some tropical ones can be seen in unusual habitats. I travelled there a lot (having lived just across the border for a few years), but only managed to visit a small fraction of the number of places worth exploring. Many generations of mammologists from USA and Mexico have worked there, but the knowledge of local mammals is still a bit sketchy, and new discoveries will certainly be made. All information below is from my trips in 2003-2005. The main roads are better and less traffic-choked than in other parts of the country, but the distances are greater, so any traveler should be mindful of fuel (expensive) and highway tolls (sometimes ridiculously high). In theory, toll roads (carretera quota) should be paralleled by free roads (carretera libre), but this isn’t always the case. Free roads are often narrow, winding, and full of traffic, but sometimes they are good for night drives (toll roads never are). All guidebooks to Mexico I’ve ever seen insist that driving at night is so dangerous, you might as well just kill yourself in advance to avoid the horror. In my experience, driving at night is usually safer, because there is less traffic, you see the headlights of upcoming cars before making the turn, and other drivers blink their lights to warn you of livestock on the road ahead.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Mammals at Walnut Canyon, Wupatki, and Sunset Crater National Monuments
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Inventory of Mammals at Walnut Canyon, Wupatki, and Sunset Crater National Monuments Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR–2009/278 ON THE COVER: Top: Wupatki National Monument; bottom left: bobcat (Lynx rufus); bottom right: Wupatki pocket mouse (Perogna- thus amplus cineris) at Wupatki National Monument. Photos courtesy of U.S. Geological Survey/Charles Drost. Inventory of Mammals at Walnut Canyon, Wupatki, and Sunset Crater National Monuments Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SCPN/NRTR—2009/278 Author Charles Drost U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Editing and Design Jean Palumbo National Park Service, Southern Colorado Plateau Network Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona December 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Technical Report Series is used to disseminate results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series provides contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Bat Count 2003
    BAT COUNT 2003 Working to promote the long term, sustainable conservation of globally threatened flying foxes in the Philippines, by developing baseline population information, increasing public awareness, and training students and protected area managers in field monitoring techniques. 1 A Terminal Report Submitted by Tammy Mildenstein1, Apolinario B. Cariño2, and Samuel Stier1 1Fish and Wildlife Biology, University of Montana, USA 2Silliman University and Mt. Talinis – Twin Lakes Federation of People’s Organizations, Diputado Extension, Sibulan, Negros Oriental, Philippines Photo by: Juan Pablo Moreiras 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Large flying foxes in insular Southeast Asia are the most threatened of the Old World fruit bats due to deforestation, unregulated hunting, and little conservation commitment from local governments. Despite the fact they are globally endangered and play essential ecological roles in forest regeneration as seed dispersers and pollinators, there have been only a few studies on these bats that provide information useful to their conservation management. Our project aims to promote the conservation of large flying foxes in the Philippines by providing protected area managers with the training and the baseline information necessary to design and implement a long-term management plan for flying foxes. We focused our efforts on the globally endangered Philippine endemics, Acerodon jubatus and Acerodon leucotis, and the bats that commonly roost with them, Pteropus hypomelanus, P. vampyrus lanensis, and P. pumilus which are thought to be declining in the Philippines. Local participation is an integral part of our project. We conducted the first national training workshop on flying fox population counts and conservation at the Subic Bay area.
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia, 2018
    Nambia and little bits of Botswana, Zimbabwe, and Zambia, July-August 2018 Michael Kessler In 1994, my wife Elke and I did our first joint trip to Namibia, spending 3 weeks mainly in the arid western parts of the country and seeing such goodies as Brown Hyena, Caracal, Black Mongoose, Honey Badger, 3 species of sengis, and Southern African Porcupine. In 2010, we made our first family trip to Africa to KwaZulu Natal, seeing much of the large game. So now we decided to return to Namibia with the family, with the aim of exploring some new areas and searching out the less easily seen species. Time and budget limited the trip to about 2½ weeks and after some deliberation, we settled on the following sites: Sesriem + Sossusvlei for the dunes; Walvisbay for Heaviside’s Dolphin + Welwitschia; Erindi for African Wild Dog and the other game; Toko Lodge for the night drives, especially for Aardvark; Etosha only briefly for the amazing wildlife spectacle; Mahango for the Okavango specials (birds and mammals); and Victoria Falls for, well, the falls. This resulted in the following Itinerary: 25.7: Left Zurich in the evening, arriving on 26.7.: am in Jo’burg, followed by a connecting flight to Windhoek where we picked up the rental car, did some grocery shopping, and fell into our beds at Arebbusch Lodge on the southern outskirts of the city. 27.7.: Long drive to Desert Homestead Lodge at Sesriem. 28.7.: am: visit to Sossusvlei; pm: Cessna flight over the dunes, followed by a night drive back to the lodge, seeing some Bat-eared Foxes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Philippine Flying Foxes, Acerodon Jubatus and Pteropus Vampyrus Lanensis
    Journal of Mammalogy, 86(4):719- 728, 2005 DIETARY HABITS OF THE WORLD’S LARGEST BATS: THE PHILIPPINE FLYING FOXES, ACERODON JUBATUS AND PTEROPUS VAMPYRUS LANENSIS Sam C. Stier* and Tammy L. M ildenstein College of Forestry and Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59802, USA The endemic and endangered golden- crowned flying fox (Acerodon jubatus) coroosts with the much more common and widespread giant Philippine fmit bat (Pteropus vampyrus ianensis) in lowland dipterocarp forests throughout the Philippine Islands. The number of these mixed roost- colonies and the populations of flying foxes in them have declined dramatically in the last century. We used fecal analysis, interviews of bat hunters, and personal observations to describe the dietary habits of both bat species at one of the largest mixed roosts remaining, near Subic Bay, west- central Luzon. Dietary items were deemed “important” if used consistently on a seasonal basis or throughout the year, ubiquitously throughout the population, and if they were of clear nutritional value. Of the 771 droppings examined over a 2.5 -year period (1998-2000), seeds from Ficus were predominant in the droppings of both species and met these criteria, particularly hemiepiphytic species (41% of droppings of A. jubatus) and Ficus variegata (34% of droppings of P. v. ianensis and 22% of droppings of A. jubatus). Information from bat hunter interviews expanded our knowledge of the dietary habits of both bat species, and corroborated the fecal analyses and personal observations. Results from this study suggest that A. jubatus is a forest obligate, foraging on fruits and leaves from plant species restricted to lowland, mature natural forests, particularly using a small subset of hemiepiphytic and other Ficus species throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010-7-Alcathoe's
    An awful lot of bat workers are going to be looking even Alcathoe Bat more closely at any Myotis they encounter. You had to be there Top photo (c) http://www.krzysztof.piksa-pl.com As we arrived at the ZSL symposium people were in little Lower photo Derek Smith’s mystery bat huddles muttering excitedly. Soon we were as excited Prof John Altringham was using the symposium to announce that Britain has a new bat species The news was kept quiet until the results had been checked and double checked but there can be no doubt. We have discussed before the nightmare which is distinguishing Brandt and whiskered bats. One of John’s research students was doing genetic analysis of Brandt and Whiskered bats and contacted John because she was getting a sizeable cluster of anomalous results that fitted neither species when she looked at the gene sequences. DNA was taken from bats in the North York Moors and Susses, and when they also looked at samples from Europe, they got the same results John says that key features to look for are forearm length, and echolocation calls. Bob and Jude were insufferably smug having seen it in Hungary ad knew how to pronounce its name (Al Kath- oh-ee). John is in favour of calling the bat Alcathoe Bat rather than Alcathoe’s John kindly sent us a copy of his draft paper. We forwarded this to taxonomy keeny Derek Smith and we could almost hear him weeping as he e mailed us back post-haste “Hi Bob and Jude, many thanks for the paper.
    [Show full text]