DOCSLIB.ORG

2011 Nuclear Weapons

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2011 Nuclear Weapons iinternationalnternational hhumanitarianumanitarian llawaw magazine IssueIssue 2, 2 2011 nnuclearuclear wweaponseapons: a uuniquenique tthreathreat ttoo hhumanityumanit y Inside this issue Editorial status of the world’s nuclear arsenal This edition of our international humanitarian law magazine – by Tim Wright, Australian director, focuses on the most dangerous weapons of all: nuclear International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear weapons. The disastrous effects of nuclear weapons were made Weapons (ICAN) – page 3 violently clear during the fi nal stages of the Second World War, the legal framework regulating when two atomic bombs were deployed against the cities of nuclear weapons – by John Carlson, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Since that time there has been an Visiting Fellow at the Lowy Institute, and alarming proliferation of these weapons and today they remain a counsellor to the Washington-based Nuclear uniquely destructive threat to all of humanity and the environment. Threat Initiative (NTI) on non-proliferation, The Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement has been at the disarmament and verifi cation issues centre of the nuclear weapons debate from the very outset. From – page 4 1945 to 2011, the Movement has consistently voiced its deep nuclear war - the environmental concerns about these weapons of mass destruction and the impacts – by Ira Helfand, emergency need for the prohibition of their use. Red Cross’ role in developing physician and past president of Physicians IHL led to the creation of the Additional Protocols to the Geneva for Social Responsibility – page 7 Conventions in 1977. Key provisions of the Additional Protocols reaffi rm and strengthen the IHL principles of distinction between nuclear weapons: a threat to combatants and civilians, and that no unnecessary suffering survival and health – by Tilman Ruff, is caused in times of war. It would be impossible to imagine Associate Professor in the Nossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne circumstances in which nuclear weapons would abide by these and Australian Red Cross International principles. Medical Advisor – page 10 This year, Australian Red Cross is launching a campaign to raise nuclear weapons: use and progress awareness of the unacceptable humanitarian consequences of towards eradication – page 12 nuclear weapons and the imperative necessity of the prohibition of their use. Part of our campaign includes this magazine, blinded by the bomb: the story of which has articles detailing the humanitarian and environmental Yami Lester – page 14 consequences of nuclear weapons, the current legal framework the ICRC’s approach – by Peter Herby, surrounding their use, a personal account of an individual whose Head of the Arms Unit in the Legal Division life was forever changed by their destructive effects, and Red of the International Committee of the Red Cross’ role to date in raising awareness around the issue. I Cross – page 16 would like to sincerely thank all the contributors for their time and expertise and also note our appreciation to Mallesons for their the nuclear weapons case – by support of this magazine. Reverend Professor Michael Tate AO, former Federal Minister for Justice and Despite its overwhelming humanitarian appeal, convincing States Ambassador to the Netherlands – page 18 to prohibit nuclear weapons will not be without its challenges. In no way, however, should this dissuade us in our efforts. In an raising awareness about the era where the number of nuclear powers is growing, it is time for humanitarian consequences of the international community to ensure that nuclear weapons are nuclear weapons – by Petra Ball, made a thing of the past rather than a threat to our future. International Humanitarian Law Offi cer for Red Cross in South Australia and Chris Kwong, co-opted member of the National Youth Advisory Committee – page 20 Cover Image: Robert Tickner The Prefectural Industrial Promotion Hall, better Chief Executive Offi cer know today as Gembaku Australian Red Cross Domu or Atomic Bomb Dome, in Hiroshima was one of the few buildings left standing within a two kilometre radius when the atomic bomb was dropped on the city in Disclaimer: The articles contained within represent the views of the August 1945. UN Photo. authors and not necessarily those of Australian Red Cross. status offth the world’s nuclear arsenal Tim Wright is the The military doctrines for using The explosives Australian director of the nuclear weapons differ from one International Campaign country to another. China, for used in all wars to Abolish Nuclear example, has said that it would throughout human Weapons (ICAN). only be prepared to use its nuclear weapons in response to a nuclear history amount There are still at least 20,000 nuclear attack and never as a preventative weapons in the world. They have a measure, while others have to around combined destructive force equivalent expressed a willingness to use 10 Mt. The largest to approximately 150,000 Hiroshima nuclear weapons pre-emptively bombs. Around 3000 of them are against a variety of threats, including nuclear explosion maintained on launch-ready alert at chemical, biological and conventional. ever detonated, all times. A global norm has developed against Nine countries possess nuclear the testing of nuclear weapons. The in Russia on weapons. In addition, fi ve European North Korean tests in 2006 and 2009 30 October 1961, nations host nuclear weapons on their are the only critical nuclear tests to territory as part of a NATO nuclear- have taken place in the last decade. was 50 Mt in size. sharing arrangement. More than 20 However, the United States continues other countries, including Australia, to test nuclear weapons ‘sub- Ukraine – while a number of others have maintain military doctrines that rely on critically’, that is, no chain reaction abandoned programs to develop them. nuclear weapons. occurs. The last such test took place More than 140 nations have called for a treaty to outlaw and eliminate all nuclear Unlike other weapons, they derive in March 2011. weapons in a verifi able, irreversible and their explosive force from nuclear Since the end of the Cold War, four time-bound manner. fi ssion (the splitting of a large atom countries have done away with their into smaller ones) or nuclear fusion nuclear weapons – South Africa, (the fusing of two or more lighter Belarus, Kazakhstan and the atoms into a large atom). The core ingredient of a nuclear bomb Global nuclear forces in 2011 is either highly enriched uranium or No. of plutonium. The former is a naturally Country warheads occurring element, while the latter United States 8500 is a by-product of nuclear power generation. A basic nuclear weapon Russia 11,000 design uses around 15kg of uranium Britain 225 or 5kg of plutonium and has an explosive yield 20 times that of the France 300 Hiroshima bomb. China 240 Nuclear weapons can be launched India 80-110 from the ground, air or sea. Their Top: The United States’ B2 bomber can carry up Pakistan 90-110 delivery vehicles are typically to 16 nuclear bombs. US Air Force Photo. (intercontinental) ballistic missiles, Israel 80 Above: Little Boy was the name given to the nuclear heavy bombers or submarines. There North Korea <10 weapon dropped on Hiroshima. Here it is in a bomb are more than 110 bases with nuclear pit on Tinian Island before being loaded into Enola Total >20,520 weapons worldwide. Gay’s bomb bay. Photo courtesy US Government. IHL magazine 3 the legal framework regulating nuclear weapons By John Carlson – Although the imperative to eliminate monopoly on nuclear weapons and Visiting Fellow at nuclear weapons was recognised share nuclear secrets with the Soviet the Lowy Institute, at the very outset of the nuclear Union, in exchange for: and counsellor to age, currently there is no general • an agreement against developing the Washington- prohibition against the possession further nuclear weapons; or use of nuclear weapons. The based Nuclear Threat fi rst resolution of the United Nations • establishment of an inspection Initiative (NTI) on General Assembly – Resolution 1 system; and non-proliferation, of 24 January 1946 – established • punishment for violations, not disarmament and the United Nations Atomic Energy subject to Security Council veto. verifi cation issues. Commission to address ‘the problems The Soviet Union responded that the raised by the discovery of atomic United States should eliminate its energy’. The Commission was to nuclear weapons fi rst, before controls United Nations Secretary-General Ban make proposals for, inter alia, ‘the and inspections could be considered. Ki-moon urges nations to make nuclear elimination from national armaments The United States, however, insisted disarmament targets a reality during the of atomic weapons’. 2010 review conference of the on retaining nuclear weapons until Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. In the Commission the United States satisfi ed with the effectiveness UN Photo. presented proposals to abandon its of international control. So this fi rst attempt to eliminate nuclear International Atomic Energy Agency • 1995 Bangkok Treaty weapons failed, and relations safeguards on all their nuclear (South East Asia); between the United States and the material to verify observance of the • 1996 Pelindaba Treaty (Africa); and Soviet Union degenerated into the commitment against the further Cold War and a nuclear arms race. proliferation of nuclear weapons. • 2006 Semipalatinsk Treaty (Central Asia). Following the Soviet Union’s fi rst In 2008 the UN Secretary-General nuclear test in 1949, attention issued a Five-Point Proposal for In addition, in 1992 Mongolia declared turned to how to stop the further Nuclear Disarmament urging all NPT itself a single-State nuclear-weapon- proliferation of nuclear weapons. Parties to fulfi ll their NPT obligation free zone. These efforts eventually led to the to undertake negotiations on Nuclear arms negotiation of the Nuclear Non- effective measures leading to nuclear Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which was disarmament. He noted they could control treaties pursue this goal by agreement on opened for signature in 1968.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Copyright by Paul Harold Rubinson 2008
    Copyright by Paul Harold Rubinson 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Paul Harold Rubinson certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Containing Science: The U.S. National Security State and Scientists’ Challenge to Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War Committee: —————————————————— Mark A. Lawrence, Supervisor —————————————————— Francis J. Gavin —————————————————— Bruce J. Hunt —————————————————— David M. Oshinsky —————————————————— Michael B. Stoff Containing Science: The U.S. National Security State and Scientists’ Challenge to Nuclear Weapons during the Cold War by Paul Harold Rubinson, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2008 Acknowledgements Thanks first and foremost to Mark Lawrence for his guidance, support, and enthusiasm throughout this project. It would be impossible to overstate how essential his insight and mentoring have been to this dissertation and my career in general. Just as important has been his camaraderie, which made the researching and writing of this dissertation infinitely more rewarding. Thanks as well to Bruce Hunt for his support. Especially helpful was his incisive feedback, which both encouraged me to think through my ideas more thoroughly, and reined me in when my writing overshot my argument. I offer my sincerest gratitude to the Smith Richardson Foundation and Yale University International Security Studies for the Predoctoral Fellowship that allowed me to do the bulk of the writing of this dissertation. Thanks also to the Brady-Johnson Program in Grand Strategy at Yale University, and John Gaddis and the incomparable Ann Carter-Drier at ISS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Treatment of Prisoners of War by the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy Focusing on the Pacific War
    The Treatment of Prisoners of War by the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy Focusing on the Pacific War TACHIKAWA Kyoichi Abstract Why does the inhumane treatment of prisoners of war occur? What are the fundamental causes of this problem? In this article, the author looks at the principal examples of abuse inflicted on European and American prisoners by military and civilian personnel of the Imperial Japanese Army and Navy during the Pacific War to analyze the causes of abusive treatment of prisoners of war. In doing so, the author does not stop at simply attributing the causes to the perpetrators or to the prevailing condi- tions at the time, such as Japan’s deteriorating position in the war, but delves deeper into the issue of the abuse of prisoners of war as what he sees as a pathology that can occur at any time in military organizations. With this understanding, he attempts to examine the phenomenon from organizational and systemic viewpoints as well as from psychological and leadership perspectives. Introduction With the establishment of the Law Concerning the Treatment of Prisoners in the Event of Military Attacks or Imminent Ones (Law No. 117, 2004) on June 14, 2004, somewhat stringent procedures were finally established in Japan for the humane treatment of prisoners of war in the context of a system infrastructure. Yet a look at the world today shows that abusive treatment of prisoners of war persists. Indeed, the heinous abuse which took place at the former Abu Ghraib prison during the Iraq War is still fresh in our memories.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO and the Frameworks of Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Disarmament
    NATO and the Frameworks of Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament: Challenges for the for 10th and Disarmament: Challenges Conference NPT Review Non-proliferation of Nuclear and the Frameworks NATO Research Paper Tim Caughley, with Yasmin Afina International Security Programme | May 2020 NATO and the Frameworks of Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament Challenges for the 10th NPT Review Conference Tim Caughley, with Yasmin Afina with Yasmin Caughley, Tim Chatham House Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 Background 5 3 NATO and the NPT 8 4 NATO: the NPT and the TPNW 15 5 NATO and the TPNW: Legal Issues 20 6 Conclusions 24 About the Authors 28 Acknowledgments 29 1 | Chatham House NATO and the Frameworks of Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament Summary • The 10th five-yearly Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (the NPT) was due to take place in April–May 2020, but has been postponed because of the COVID-19 pandemic. • In force since 1970 and with 191 states parties, the NPT is hailed as the cornerstone of a rules-based international arms control and non-proliferation regime, and an essential basis for the pursuit of nuclear disarmament. But successive review conferences have been riven by disagreement between the five nuclear weapon states and many non-nuclear weapon states over the appropriate way to implement the treaty’s nuclear disarmament pillar. • Although the number of nuclear weapons committed to NATO defence has been reduced by over 90 per cent since the depths of the Cold War, NATO nuclear weapon states, and their allies that depend on the doctrine of extended nuclear deterrence for their own defence, favour continued retention of the remaining nuclear weapons until the international security situation is conducive to further progress on nuclear disarmament.
    [Show full text]
  • The Secret History of Australia's Nuclear Ambitions
    Jim Walsh SURPRISE DOWN UNDER: THE SECRET HISTORY OF AUSTRALIAS NUCLEAR AMBITIONS by Jim Walsh Jim Walsh is a visiting scholar at the Center for Global Security Research at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. He is also a Ph.D. candidate in the Political Science program at MIT, where he is completing a dissertation analyzing comparative nuclear decisionmaking in Australia, the Middle East, and Europe. ustralia is widely considered tactical nuclear weapons. In 1961, of state behavior and the kinds of Ato be a world leader in ef- Australia proposed a secret agree- policies that are most likely to retard forts to halt and reverse the ment for the transfer of British the spread of nuclear weapons? 1 spread of nuclear weapons. The nuclear weapons, and, throughout This article attempts to answer Australian government created the the 1960s, Australia took actions in- some of these questions by examin- Canberra Commission, which called tended to keep its nuclear options ing two phases in Australian nuclear for the progressive abolition of open. It was not until 1973, when history: 1) the attempted procure- nuclear weapons. It led the fight at Australia ratified the NPT, that the ment phase (1956-1963); and 2) the the U.N. General Assembly to save country finally renounced the acqui- indigenous capability phase (1964- the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty sition of nuclear weapons. 1972). The historical reconstruction (CTBT), and the year before, played Over the course of four decades, of these events is made possible, in a major role in efforts to extend the Australia has gone from a country part, by newly released materials Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of that once sought nuclear weapons to from the Australian National Archive Nuclear Weapons (NPT) indefi- one that now supports their abolition.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Committee of the Red Cross
    The Ethical Witness: The International Committee of the Red Cross Ritu Mathur Ph.D Student Department of Political Science York University YCISS Working Paper Number 47 February 2008 The YCISS Working Paper Series is designed to stimulate feedback from other experts in the field. The series explores topical themes that reflect work being undertaken at the Centre. How are we to understand the ethics of humanitarian organizations as they act as witnesses to situations of armed conflict? How do the ethics of a humanitarian organization influence its silence or speech with regard to particular situations of armed conflict? How is this silence or speech interpreted as a moral failure or a moral success of a humanitarian organization? These questions are central to my concern with the ethics and politics of humanitarianism. These questions have relevance to undertakings of humanitarian organizations in a historical sense during the period of the Second World War to the present day conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. I am interested in exploring these questions by presenting a close study of ethics as articulated by Giorgio Agamben in his book Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive.1 I am particularly interested in his concept of the witness as an ethical entity charting the topography of political violence. By positing the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) as a witness to the holocaust, I am interested in observing how Agamben’s perspective on ethics provides new insights into understanding the ethics of a humanitarian organization and how it is important for a thinker’s engagement with ethics to be grounded in an empirical reality experienced by humanitarian actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Fallout and Intelligence As Secrets, Problems, and Limitations on the Arms Race, 1940-1964
    © Copyright 2016 Michael R. Lehman NUISANCE TO NEMESIS: NUCLEAR FALLOUT AND INTELLIGENCE AS SECRETS, PROBLEMS, AND LIMITATIONS ON THE ARMS RACE, 1940-1964 BY MICHAEL R. LEHMAN DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2016 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Lillian Hoddeson, Chair Professor Kristin Hoganson, Co-Chair Professor Michael Weissman Professor Robert Jacobs, Hiroshima City University Abstract Fallout sampling and other nuclear intelligence techniques were the most important sources of United States strategic intelligence in the early Cold War. Operated as the Atomic Energy Detection System by a covert Air Force unit known as AFOAT-1, the AEDS detected emissions and analyzed fallout from Soviet nuclear tests, as well as provided quantitative intelligence on the size of the Russian nuclear stockpile. Virtually unknown because the only greater Cold War secret than nuclear weapons was intelligence gathered about them, data on the Soviet threat produced by AFOAT-1 was an extraordinary influence on early National Intelligence Estimates, the rapid growth of the Strategic Air Command, and strategic war plans. Official guidance beginning with the first nuclear test in 1945 otherwise suggested fallout was an insignificant effect of nuclear weapons. Following AFOAT-1’s detection of Soviet testing in fall 1949 and against the cautions raised about the problematic nature of higher yield weapons by the General Advisory Committee, the Atomic Energy Commission’s top scientific advisers, President Harry Truman ordered the AEC to quickly build these extraordinarily powerful weapons, testing the first in secrecy in November 1952.
    [Show full text]
  • CF Item = Barcode Top - Note at Bottom = Page 1 CF Ltem One BC5-Top-Sign Date 23-Sep-2003 Time 5:03:23 PM Login Uyoung
    CF Item = Barcode Top - Note at Bottom = Page 1 CF_ltem_One_BC5-Top-Sign Date 23-Sep-2003 Time 5:03:23 PM Login uyoung CF/RAD/USAA/DBOl/1997-05727 II Document Register Number [auto] CF/RAD/USAA/DB01/1997-05727 ExRef: Document Series / Year/ Number E/ICEF/1948/W.026 Doc Item Record Title Korea - Report on Special Mission by Dr. Marcel Junod Date Created/On Doc Date Registered Date Closed / Superseeded 21-Oct-1948 OWan-1997 Primary Contact Owner Location Office of the Secretary, Executive Bo = 3024 Home Location Office of the Secretary, Executive Bo = 3024 Current Location Record & Archive Manage Related Functions=80669443 11: In Out Internal, Rec or Conv Copy? Fd2: Language, Orig Pub Dist English, L.Avail: E,f..; L.Orig: E-? Fd3: Doc Type or Format Container File Folder Record Container Record (Title) Nu1: Number of pages Nu2: Doc Year Nu3: Doc Number 0 1948 26 Full GCG File Plan Code Record GCG File Plan Da1: Date Published Da2: Date Received Da3: Date Distributed Priority 21-0ct-1948 Record Type A04 Doc Item: E/ICEF1946 to 1997 Ex Bd DOS File Name Electronic Details No Document Alt Bar code = RAMP-TRIM Record Number CF/RAD/USAA/DB01/1997-05727 Notes Document Format Series/Year/SubSeries/Number/Rev: E/ICEF/1948/W.026; Doc Series/SubSeries/Year/Number/Rev:E/ICEF/W/1948/26 Doc Series: E/ICEF/W; Series Valid date on import: 01-Jan-1947; Doc Year: 1948; Doc Number: 0026; Doc Print Name of Person Submit Images Signature of Person Submit Number of images without cover iy>*L> «-*.
    [Show full text]
  • Atomic Testing in Australian Art Jd Mittmann
    ATO MIC TEST ING IN AUST RAL IAN ART JD MIT TMA NN Around the world artists have be en conce rned wit h Within a radius of 800m the dest ruction is co mplete . and Walle r. He docume nted the Austr alian New Gui nea nuclear iss ues, from the first application of atomic bomb s Over 70,000 die instantl y. campaign and its afte rmath . at Hi roshima and Nagasaki, to at omic testing, uraniu m A person stan ds lost amongst the ruins of a house . In 1946 he was se nt to Japan whe re he witnes sed mining, nuc lear waste tra nspo rt and storage, and We don’t see the chi ld’s exp ression, but it can only be the effects of the ato mic bomb. He doc umented the va st scenarios of nuclear Armageddon. The Australian artisti c one of shock and suffering. A charred tree towers ov er dest ruction from a distant vi ewpoint, spa ring the viewe r response to Bri tish atomic te sting in the 195 0s is les s the rubble. Natu re has withe red in the on slaught of hea t the ho rri fic deta ils. His sketch Rebuilding Hiroshim a well-know n, as is the sto ry of the tests . and shock waves. Simply titled Hi roshima , Albe rt Tucker’ s shows civil ians clearing away the rubble. Li fe ha s Cloaked in se crec y, the British atomic testing progra m small wate rcolour is quiet and conte mplative.
    [Show full text]
  • A Doctor's Account
    THE HIROSHIMA DISASTER - A DOCTOR'S ACCOUNT Marcel Junod was the first foreign doctor to reach Hiroshima after the atom bomb attack on 6 August 1945. Junod, the new head of the ICRC's delegation in Japan, arrived in Tokyo on 9 August 1945 - the very day that the United States dropped a second atomic bomb, this time on Nagasaki. Junod, who had been travelling for two months and had not caught up with the news, was astounded: “For the first time I heard the name of Hiroshima, the words "atom bomb". Some said that there were possibly 100,000 dead; others retorted 50,000. The bomb was said to have been dropped by parachute, the victims had been burnt to death by rays, etc...” Information was hard to come by, and Junod's immediate task was to visit Allied prisoners of war held in Japan (Emperor Hirohito's surrender broadcast came on 15 August). It was only after one of the ICRC delegates in the field sent Junod a telegram with apocalyptic details of the Hiroshima disaster that Junod could set the wheels in motion for a belated, but still vital, relief effort. On 8 September he flew from Tokyo with members of an American technical commission, and a consignment of relief provided by the US armed forces. “At twelve o'clock, we flew over Hiroshima. We... witnessed a site totally unlike anything we had ever seen before. The centre of the city was a sort of white patch, flattened and smooth like the palm of a hand. Nothing remained.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Education Materials～Toward a Peaceful World Free of Nuclear
    Peace Education ～Toward a Peaceful World Free of Nuclear Weapons～ An Oasis amidst the ruins Area around the hospital, 1.5km south of the hypocenter Japanese Red Cross Society – Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital & Atomic-bomb Survivors Hospital 2018Edition Contents I. Introduction １ II. Establishing of the Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital 2 III. Dropping of the A-bomb 3 IV. Testimony by two nurses who worked day and night for 6 nursing patients V. Dr. Marcel Junod's humanitarian activity 8 VI. Sadako Sasaki and the “Children's Peace Monument” 8 VII. Foundation of Hiroshima Atomic-bomb Survivors Hospital 9 VIII. Memorial Park 12 IX. Supportive Activities for Atomic-bomb Survivors 15 X. Medical Treatment and Current Situation of the Patients 17 of Atomic-bomb Survivors at this Hospital I. Introduction Welcome to the Hiroshima Red Cross & Atomic-bomb Survivors Hospital. “Seventy－one years ago on a bright,cloudless morning death fell from the sky and the world was changed.”（U.S. President Barack Obama） An A-bomb was dropped on Hiroshima at 8:15 a.m. of August 6, on Nagasaki at 11:02 a.m. of August 9 in1945. During the World War Ⅱ,many people living in Tokyo and other major cities in Japan were sacrificed and injured by big raids of fire bombs. A-bomb Survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki are suffering even now because of the influence of an A-bomb radiation . What was found by city doctors in Hiroshima and is now widely well known is that relatively many of the A-bomb survivors suffer from leukemia and/or cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Committee of the Red Cross and Chemical Warfare in the Italo-Ethiopian War 1935-1936
    Force versus law: The International Committee of the Red Cross and chemical warfare in the Italo-Ethiopian war 1935-1936 by Rainer Baudendistel "Caritas inter arma" is no longer possible: this is all-out war, pure and simple, with no distinction made between the national army and the civilian population, and it is inevitable that the poor Red Cross is drowning in the flood. Sidney H. Brown, ICRC delegate, 25 March 19361 M"e Odier: (...) How can we reconcile the obligation to remain silent with the dictates of human conscience? That is the problem. President: We kept silent because we did not know the truth. Minutes of ICRC meeting, 3 July 19362 Rainer Baudendistel has a degree in philosophy and history from the University of Geneva and an M.A. in international relations from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. An experienced ICRC delegate, the author has spent a total of six years in Ethiopia and Eritrea. 1 "lln'y a plus de possibility de "caritas inter arma", c'est la guerre a outrance pure et simple, sans distinction aucune entre I 'armee nationale et la population civile, et quant a lapauvre Croix-Rouge, il est Men naturel qu'elle soit engloutie dans lesflots. " Archives of the International Committee of the Red Cross, Geneva (hereafter "ICRC Archives"), Rapports des delegues. No. 13, 25 March 1936. - Note: all translations of original French extracts from ICRC Archives by the author. 2 "M"e Odier: (...) Comment concilier le devoir du silence et celui d'exprimer les avis de la conscience humaine? Tel est le probleme.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons: the Role
    TREATY ON THE PROHIBITION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS: THE ROLE PLAYED BY GLOBAL CIVIL SOCIETY A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of International Relations and Diplomacy University of Canterbury by Tilly Hampton University of Canterbury 2018 Abstract On 7 July 2017, the United Nations General Assembly voted in favour of adopting the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. The negotiations which took place leading to this historic agreement marked the first time in over twenty years that international negotiations on nuclear disarmament had taken place. Amongst several states that supported the adoption of such a treaty, a significant number of civil society organisations were also involved during the process, some of whom can be described as being part of ‘global civil society’. Of particular note, the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons were the principal coordinator for civil society. Using the international relations approach of constructivism, this paper explores the role of global civil society in the period leading to the adoption of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. The ‘norm life cycle’ from International Norm Dynamics and Political Change by Martha Finnemore and Katherine Sikkink, provides a framework to answer this question. This is applied to two distinctive periods leading to the adoption of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons; the Humanitarian Initiative and the negotiations for the treaty itself. Following analysis of specific engagements undertaken by global civil society during these periods, this paper finds that global civil society played the role of ‘norm entrepreneurs’ for the emerging norm of a comprehensive ban on nuclear weapons.
    [Show full text]