Mid-Carpal Hemiarthroplasty
Mid-Carpal Hemiarthroplasty S.W. WOLFE , E. JANG (NE W YORK ), G. PACKER (SOUTHEND -ON -S EA , UK), J.J. CRI S CO (PROVIDENCE , RI) Historical Perspective these procedures has been demonstrated to halt the progression of arthritis, but each has been demonstrated to provide Wrist arthritis, whether caused by trauma, symptomatic relief of pain and return to instability, or inflammatory arthropathy, is functional activities, often for prolonged one of the most common conditions periods [9]. treated by hand surgeons. The manage ment of wrist arthritis varies with the Arthrodesis eliminates arthritic joints, severity and etiology of the pathology, and as such, is a more permanent with the common goal of achieving pain solution. Total arthrodesis has long been free function. The progressive nature of a mainstay in the surgical treatment of arthritis dictates that while any number severe wrist osteoarthritis because of its of conservative treatments may be relative ease of execution, durability of effective in relieving symptoms, continued symptom relief, and predictability of loading of an arthritic joint will result in longterm results [10, 11]. While total the need for further intervention. In wrist fusion results in predictable relief of patients with painful and dysfunctional pain, the inevitable loss of motion may arthritic wrists who have failed conserva result in an undesired loss of functionality tive management, surgical interventions [11, 12]. Furthermore, total arthrodesis is are generally grouped into one of three contraindicated in the patient with severe surgical categories: ablation, arthrodesis, rheumatoid arthritis involving multiple or arthroplasty. Each option has a unique joints, for whom wrist motion may be set of advantages and disadvantages.
[Show full text]