Functional Anatomy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Functional Anatomy Hamill_ch05_137-186.qxd 11/2/07 3:55 PM Page 137 SECTION II Functional Anatomy CHAPTER 5 Functional Anatomy of the Upper Extremity CHAPTER 6 Functional Anatomy of the Lower Extremity CHAPTER 7 Functional Anatomy of the Trunk Hamill_ch05_137-186.qxd 11/2/07 3:55 PM Page 138 Hamill_ch05_137-186.qxd 11/2/07 3:55 PM Page 139 CHAPTER 5 Functional Anatomy of the Upper Extremity OBJECTIVES After reading this chapter, the student will be able to: 1. Describe the structure, support, and movements of the joints of the shoulder girdle, shoulder joint, elbow, wrist, and hand. 2. Describe the scapulohumeral rhythm in an arm movement. 3. Identify the muscular actions contributing to shoulder girdle, elbow, wrist, and hand movements. 4. Explain the differences in muscle strength across the different arm movements. 5. Identify common injuries to the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand. 6. Develop a set of strength and flexibility exercises for the upper extremity. 7. Identify the upper extremity muscular contributions to activities of daily living (e.g., rising from a chair), throwing, swimming, and swinging a golf club). 8. Describe some common wrist and hand positions used in precision or power. The Shoulder Complex Anatomical and Functional Characteristics Anatomical and Functional Characteristics of the Joints of the Wrist and Hand of the Joints of the Shoulder Combined Movements of the Wrist and Combined Movement Characteristics Hand of the Shoulder Complex Muscular Actions Muscular Actions Strength of the Hand and Fingers Strength of the Shoulder Muscles Conditioning Conditioning Injury Potential of the Hand and Fingers Injury Potential of the Shoulder Complex Contribution of Upper Extremity The Elbow and Radioulnar Joints Musculature to Sports Skills or Movements Anatomical and Functional Characteristics Overhand Throwing of the Joints of the Elbow The Golf Swing Muscular Actions External Forces and Moments Acting Strength of the Forearm Muscles at Joints in the Upper Extremity Conditioning Summary Injury Potential of the Forearm Review Questions The Wrist and Fingers 139 Hamill_ch05_137-186.qxd 11/2/07 3:55 PM Page 140 140 SECTION II Functional Anatomy he upper extremity is interesting from a functional Spine of scapula Tanatomy perspective because of the interplay among the various joints and segments necessary for smooth, effi- Supraspinous cient movement. Movements of the hand are made more fossa effective through proper hand positioning by the elbow, Acromion shoulder joint, and shoulder girdle. Also, forearm move- ments occur in concert with both hand and shoulder Coracoid movements (47). These movements would not be half as process effective if the movements occurred in isolation. Because of our heavy use of our arms and hands, the shoulder needs a high degree of structural protection and a high Shaft degree of functional control (4). Acromial end of clavicle Acromioclavicular The Shoulder Complex A joint The shoulder complex has many articulations, each con- tributing to the movement of the arm through coordi- Impression for Sternal end Acromial end costoclavicular ligament of clavical nated joint actions. Movement at the shoulder joint of clavicle involves a complex integration of static and dynamic sta- bilizers. There must be free motion and coordinated actions between all four joints: the scapulothoracic, ster- noclavicular, acromioclavicular, and glenohumeral Groove for joints (63,75). Although it is possible to create a small subclavius muscle amount of movement at any one of these articulations in Trapezoid line Conoid tubercle For first isolation, movement usually is generated at all of these costal cartilage joints concomitantly as the arm is raised or lowered or if B any other significant arm action is produced (88). Anterior sternoclavicular Interclavicular ANATOMICAL AND FUNCTIONAL ligament ligament CHARACTERISTICS OF THE JOINTS OF THE SHOULDER Sternoclavicular Joint The only point of skeletal attachment of the upper extremity to the trunk occurs at the sternoclavicular joint. Clavicle At this joint, the clavicle is joined to the manubrium of the sternum. The clavicle serves four roles by serving as a 1st rib site of muscular attachment, providing a barrier to protect underlying structures, acting as a strut to stabilize the Costoclavicular ligament shoulder and prevent medial displacement when the mus- Intra-articular cles contract, and preventing an inferior migration of the disk shoulder girdle (75). The large end of clavicle articulating Sternoclavicular joint capsule and anterior 2nd rib with a small surface on the sternum at the sternoclavicular ligament joint requires significant stability from the ligaments (75). A close view of the clavicle and the sternoclavicular joint is C shown in Figure 5-1. This gliding synovial joint has a FIGURE 5-1 The clavicle articulates with the acromion process on the fibrocartilaginous disc (89). The joint is reinforced by scapula to form the acromioclavicular joint (A). An S-shaped bone (B), the clavicle also articulates with the sternum to form the sternoclavicu- three ligaments: the interclavicular, costoclavicular, and lar joint (C). sternoclavicular ligaments, of which the costoclavicular ligament is the main support for the joint (73) (Fig. 5-2). The joint is also reinforced and supported by muscles, freedom. The clavicle can move superiorly and inferiorly such as the short, powerful subclavius. Additionally, a in movements referred to as elevation and depression, strong joint capsule contributes to making the joint respectively. These movements take place between the resilient to dislocation or disruption. clavicle and the meniscus in the sternoclavicular joint Movements of the clavicle at the sternoclavicular and have a range of motion of approximately 30° to joint occur in three directions, giving it three degrees of 40° (75,89). Hamill_ch05_137-186.qxd 11/2/07 3:55 PM Page 141 CHAPTER 5 Functional Anatomy of the Upper Extremity 141 Coracoclavicular Coracoclavicular ligament (conoid) ligament (trapezoid) Clavicle Coracoacromial ligament Acromioclavicular ligament Acromion Coracohumeral ligament Costoclavicular ligament Subscapular bursae Glenohumeral Anterior sternoclavicular ligament ligament Transverse humeral ligament Biceps brachii Subscapularis tendon A B Ligament Insertion Action Acromioclavicular Acromion process TO clavicle Prevents separation of clavicle and scapula; prevents posterior and anterior displacement Coracoacromial Coracoid process TO acromion process Forms arch over shoulder Coracoclavicular: Trapezoid, Base of coracoid process TO inferior Maintains relationship between scapula and clavicle; prevents conoid surface of clavicle anterior and posterior scapula movements; prevents upward and downward movements of clavicle on scapula Coracohumeral Base of lateral coracoid process TO Checks upward displacement of humeral head; checks external greater and lesser tuberosity rotation; prevents posterior glide of humeral head during flexion, on humerus adduction, and internal rotation; prevents inferior translation of humeral head during shoulder adduction Costoclavicular Upper surface of first rib to inferior Anterior fibers resist excessive upper rotation, and posterior fibers clavicle resist excessive downward rotation of clavicle; checks clavicle elevation and anterior, posterior, lateral movement Glenohumeral: Inferior, Upper anterior edge of glenoid TO Taut in external rotation and abduction; limits anterior middle, superior over, in front of, below humeral head translation of humerus Interclavicular Superomedial clavicle TO capsule Prevents superior and lateral displacement of clavicle on sternum; and upper sternum checks against excessive downward rotation of clavicle Sternoclavicular: anterior, Clavicle TO sternum Prevents anterior and posterior glide of clavicle posterior Transverse Across bicipital groove Keeps biceps tendon in groove FIGURE 5-2 Ligaments of the shoulder region. Anterior aspects of the sternum (A) and shoulder (B) are shown. The clavicle can also move anteriorly and posteriorly via similar to the sternoclavicular joint (73). At this joint, movements in the transverse plane termed protraction most of the movements of the scapula on the clavicle and retraction, respectively. These movements occur occur, and the joint handles large contact stresses as a between the sternum and the meniscus in the joint result of high axial loads that are transmitted through the through a range of motion of approximately 30° to 35° in joint (75). each direction (75). Finally, the clavicle can rotate anteri- The AC joint lies over the top of the humeral head orly and posteriorly along its long axis through approxi- and can serve as a bony restriction to arm movements mately 40° to 50° (75,89). above the head. The joint is reinforced with a dense cap- sule and a set of AC ligaments lying above and below the Acromioclavicular Joint joint (Fig. 5-2). The AC ligaments primarily support the The clavicle is connected to the scapula at its distal end via joint in low load and small movement situations. Close the acromioclavicular (AC) joint (Fig. 5-1). This is a small, to the AC joint is the important coracoclavicular liga- gliding synovial joint that is the size of 9 by 19 mm in ment, which assists scapular movements by serving as an adults (75) and it frequently has a fibrocartilaginous disc axis of rotation and by providing substantial support in Hamill_ch05_137-186.qxd 11/2/07 3:55 PM Page 142 142 SECTION II Functional Anatomy movements requiring more
Recommended publications
  • Considered a Bone of Both Shoulder Girdle and Shoulder Joint. the Shoulder Girdle Is Comprised of the Clavicle and the Scapula
    Considered a bone of both shoulder girdle and shoulder joint. The shoulder girdle is comprised of the clavicle and the scapula. The shoulder joint consists of the scapula and the humerus. The primary function of the shoulder girdle is to position itself to accommodate movements of the shoulder joint. 1 Superior angle—top point Inferior angle—bottom point Vertebral border—side closest to vertebral column Axillary border—side closest to arm Subscapular fossa—anterior fossa Glenoid fossa, glenoid labrum, glenoid cavity --The glenoid fossa is the shallow cavity where the humeral head goes. The glenoid labrum is the cartilage that goes around the glenoid fossa. So the glenoid fossa and glenoid labrum together comprise the glenoid cavity. Supraspinous fossa—posterior, fossa above the spine Spine of the scapula—the back projection Infraspinous fossa—posterior depression/fossa below spine Coracoid process—anterior projection head Acromion process—posterior projection head above spine 2 Scapulothoracic “joint” = NOT a true joint; there are no ligaments or articular capsule. The scapula just rests on the muscle over top the rib cage, which allows for passive movements. Sternoclavicular joint=where the clavicle (collarbone) and the sternum (breastbone) articulate; movement is slight in all directions and of a gliding, rotational type Acromioclavicular joint = where the clavicle and scapula (acromion process) articulate; AKA: AC Joint; movement is a slight gliding when elevation and depression take place. Glenohumeral joint = the shoulder joint 3 4 All 3 true joints: Sternoclavicular, AC and glenohumeral (GH) all work together to move arm in all directions. The GH allows the arm to go out to the side and be abducted, then the AC and Sternoclavicular joints kick in to allow the arm to go above shoulder level by allowing the shoulderblade to move up to increase the range of motion (ROM).
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 IWIW Meeting Abstracts, Las Vegas, Wed. Sept. 4Th SESSION 1
    2019 IWIW Meeting Abstracts, Las Vegas, Wed. Sept. 4th SESSION 1: Carpal Ligament 1 Stable Central Column Theory of Carpal Mechanics Michael Sandow FRACS Wakefield Orthopaedic Clinic Adelaide, Australia Background: The carpus is a complicated and functionally challenged mechanical system and advancements in the understanding have been compromised by the recognition that there is no standard carpal mechanical system and no typical wrist. This paper cover component of a larger project that seeks to develop a kinetic model of wrist mechanics to allow reverse analysis of the specific biomechanical controls or rule of a specific patient's carpus, and then use those to create a forward mathematical model to reproduce the unique individual's anatomical motion based on the extracted rules. Objectives and Methods: Based on previous observations, the carpus essentially moves with only 2 degrees of freedom - pitch (flexion / extension) and yaw (radial deviation / ulnar deviation), while largely preventing roll (pronation / supination). The object of this paper is therefore to present the background and justification to support the rules based motion (RBM) concept states that the motion of a mechanical system, such as the wrist, is the net interplay of 4 rules - morphology, constraint, interaction and load. The Stable Central Column Theory (SCCT) of wrist mechanics applies the concept of RBM to the carpus, and by using a reverse engineering computational analysis model, identified a consistent pattern of isometric constraints, creating a "Two-Gear Four-Bar" linkage. This study assessed the motion of the carpus using a 3D dynamic visualization model, and the hypothesis was that the pattern and direction of motion of the proximal row, and the distal row with respect the immediately cephalad carpal bones or radius would be very similar in all directions of wrist motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Intrinsic Hand Muscles of the Japanese Monkey, Macaca Fuscata
    Anthropol.Sci. 102(Suppl.), 85-95,1994 Intrinsic Hand Muscles of the Japanese Monkey, Macaca fuscata TOSHIHIKO HOMMA AND TATSUO SAKAI Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Hongo 2-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113, Japan Received December 24, 1993 •ôGH•ô Abstract•ôGS•ô Anatomy of the intrinsic hand muscles in the Japanese monkeys was studied with an improved method to dissect the muscles and nerves in water after removal of the skeletal framework. The thenar eminence contained four muscles, namely m. abductor pollicis brevis, m. opponens pollicis, m, flexor pollicis brevis, and m. adductor pollicis. The hypothenar eminence contained four muscles, namely m. palmaris brevis, m. abductor digiti minimi, m. flexor digiti minimi brevis, and m. opponens digiti minimi. Majority of the thenar muscles are fused more or less with each other, so that clear separation of these muscles was difficult. The lumbrical muscles arose from the palmar parts of four main tendons of the deep flexor muscle to the second, third, fourth, and fifth digits. The mm, contrahentes arose mainly from a medial tendinous septum attached on the palmar surface to the third metacarpus, and included three muscles destined to the second, fourth and fifth digits. The interossei were found on the radial side of the second, third, fourth and fifth finger as well as on the ulnar side of the second, third and fourth finger. The intrinsic hand muscles in the Japanese monkey received innervation either from the median or the ulnar nerve. Branching pattern of these nerves to the individual muscles was fundamentally similar to those in man except for the fact that the median and the ulnar nerve in the Japanese monkey do not communi cateto make a loop in the thenar muscles.
    [Show full text]
  • Ossified Brodie's Ligament
    International Journal of Anatomy and Research, Int J Anat Res 2015, Vol 3(2):1084-86. ISSN 2321- 4287 Case Report DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2015.169 OSSIFIED BRODIE’S LIGAMENT R. Siva Chidambaram *1, Neelee Jayasree 2, Soorya Sridhar 3. *1,3 Post Graduate, 2 Professor and Head. Department of Anatomy, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India. ABSTRACT The transverse humeral ligament (THL) or Brodie’s ligament is a narrow sheet of connective tissue fibers that runs between the lesser and the greater tubercles of the humerus. Together with the intertubercular groove of the humerus, the ligament creates a canal through which the long head of the biceps tendon and its synovial sheath passes. The ossification of transverse humeral ligament is a rare interesting anatomical variation, which has been identified as one of the predisposing factor for biceps tendonitis and tenosynovitis. In the present study of 100 humerus bones, we found a right side humerus with completely ossified transverse humeral ligament which extended from the lateral margin of lesser tubercle to the medial margin of greater tubercle of the humerus. The Length and breadth of the ossified ligament were 8 mm and 6 mm respectively. Such an ossified ligament may damage the biceps tendon and its synovial sheath during biomechanical movement of the arm leading to anterior shoulder pain. It may also complicate the use of bicipital groove as a landmark for orientation of the humeral prosthesis in complex proximal humeral fractures. Hence, the anatomical knowledge of ossified transverse humeral ligament is important for the radiologist and orthopedic surgeon in diagnosis and planning the treatment for patient with anterior shoulder pain.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobilization for the Neurologically Involved Child
    MOBILIZATION FOR THE NEUROLOGICALLY INVOLVED CHILD Assessment and Application Strategies For Pediatric PTs and OTs Sandy Brooks-Scott M.S., PPT, PCS www.clinicians-view.com Chapter I Pathology and Resultant Immobility Mobility is a worthy goal. However, before it can be achieved in a child with neurological dysfunction, certain prerequisites must be in place: normal bony alignment; normal muscle strength, flexibility and endurance; a coordinating nervous system; an efficient cardiorespi­ ratory system; and normal connective tissue flexibility. Immobility after initial neurological insult affects all these systems, making assessment and treatment of all systems interfering with efficient mobility a paramount goal of the therapist. Neurological Damage-Original Insult The motor result of the neurological insult is dependent upon the age, the location, and the extent of the insult (Brann 1988; Costello et al. 1988; Nelson 1988; Pape and Wigglesworth 1979). The most widely discussed reason for brain damage in the pre-, peri- or initial postnatal stages is a change in blood pressure, causing the vessels in the developing organ to hemorrhage or become ischemic (Pape and Wigglesworth 1979). Nelson (1988) notes that most infants who live through severe asphyxia at birth do not develop cerebral palsy or mental retardation. Brann (1988), in his discussion of the effects of acute total and prolonged partial asphyxia, clearly demonstrates that the neurological changes and motor outcomes vary depending on the acuteness, duration, and severity of the asphyxia. Because a child will not have autoregulatory mechanisms to control blood pressure until 3 months of age, excessive heat loss, abnormal partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide, or fluid imbalances can affect a newborn's blood pressure, producing ischemic hypoxia and neural damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Limb Fractures in Rugby in Huddersfield 1986- 1 990
    Br J Sp Med 1991; 25(3) From the Clinic Br J Sports Med: first published as 10.1136/bjsm.25.3.139 on 1 September 1991. Downloaded from Upper limb fractures in rugby in Huddersfield 1986- 1 990 K.S. Eyres FRCS', A. Abdel-Salam FRCS2 and J. Cleary FRCS3 Research Registrar, Department of Human Metabolism and Clinical Biochemistry, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK 2 Orthopaedic Registrar, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Huddersfield, UK 3 Orthopaedic Consultant, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Huddersfield, UK Most injuries sustained by rugby players affect the soft Case 1 tissues, and fracture is relatively uncommon. Whereas the lower limb is most affected in footballers, the upper limb A 24-year-old full-back fractured his left clavicle in a tends to be injured in rugby players. Thirty consecutive scrummage in 1988 (Figure 1). Six months later, he fractures and ten dislocations affecting the upper limb, sustained a direct blow to the left shoulder. Radio- sustained by 35 rugby players, are reported. graphs showed a fracture to the greater tuberosity of the left humerus (Figure 2). He was treated with a Keywords: Rugby injury, hamate fracture, sports injury collar and cuff and was able to return to matchplay after 2 months. Nine months later he fell onto his left hand after a tackle. Radiographs showed a sagittal Most injuries sustained in rugby matches are to the fracture of the body of the hamate and a fracture of soft tissues. Fractures are relatively uncommon, the base of the fourth metacarpal (Figure 3). He was estimated to account for only 4% of injuries in adult treated conservatively with plaster immobilization, matches and for 5% of injuries in school matches'.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW ARTICLE Osteoarthritis of the Wrist
    REVIEW ARTICLE Osteoarthritis of the Wrist Krista E. Weiss, Craig M. Rodner, MD From Harvard College, Cambridge, MA and Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT. Osteoarthritis of the wrist is one of the most common conditions encountered by hand surgeons. It may result from a nonunited or malunited fracture of the scaphoid or distal radius; disruption of the intercarpal, radiocarpal, radioulnar, or ulnocarpal ligaments; avascular necrosis of the carpus; or a developmental abnormality. Whatever the cause, subsequent abnormal joint loading produces a spectrum of symptoms, from mild swelling to considerable pain and limitations of motion as the involved joints degenerate. A meticulous clinical and radiographic evaluation is required so that the pain-generating articulation(s) can be identi- fied and eliminated. This article reviews common causes of wrist osteoarthritis and their surgical treatment alternatives. (J Hand Surg 2007;32A:725–746. Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.) Key words: Wrist, osteoarthritis, arthrodesis, carpectomy, SLAC. here are several different causes, both idio- of events is analogous to SLAC wrist and has pathic and traumatic, of wrist osteoarthritis. been termed scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse Untreated cases of idiopathic carpal avascular (SNAC). Wrist osteoarthritis can also occur second- T 1 2 necrosis, as in Kienböck’s or Preiser’s disease, may ary to an intra-articular fracture of the distal radius or result in radiocarpal arthritis. Congenital wrist abnor- ulna or from an extra-articular fracture resulting in malities, such as Madelung’s deformity,3,4 can lead malunion and abnormal joint loading.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiohamate Impingement After Proximal Row Carpectomy ‘Radiohamate Impingement PRC’
    Acta Orthop. Belg., 2020, 86 e-supplement 1, 19-21 CASE REPORT Radiohamate impingement after proximal row carpectomy ‘Radiohamate impingement PRC’ Pieter Caekebeke, Luc De Smet From the Department of Orthopaedics UZ Leuven, Pellenberg, Belgium Radiocarpal impingement after PRC is a well-known from 0% to 18% (5). Radiocarpal and pisiform complication due to impingement of the radial styloid impingement have been described after PRC. The against the radial carpal bones. A less common first is probably due to the proximalization of the impingement syndrome is that of the pisiforme. distal row with impingement of the trapezium/ We describe a radiohamate impingement and its trapezoid against the radial styloid process. The diagnosis and treatment. Based on a case we saw treatment is a radial styloid process resection for at our practice. Diagnosis is bases on standard radiographs and SPECT-CT. The treatment is the first and a pisiformectomy for the latter (3,5). No initially conservative. Surgery is necessary when other impingement syndromes have been described. conservative treatment fails and consists of resectie We present a case of radiohamate impingement of the proximal pole of the hamate. syndrome after proximal row carpectomy. Keywords: Radiohamate ; impingement ; proximal row CASE REPORT carpectomy. A 53-year-old mechanic contacted us 1 year after a work-accident with localized radiocarpal INTRODUCTION pain and swelling. Radiographs showed a stage Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is a well- two SLAC wrist. (Fig. 1) A PRC with synovectomy established motion-preserving salvage procedure was performed. The following 3 years were for degenerative disorders of the proximal carpal uneventful with no to minimal pain complaints.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the Effects on Throwing Velocity of Straight Plane
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Physical Therapy Scholarly Projects Department of Physical Therapy 2005 A Comparison of the Effects on Throwing Velocity of Straight Plane versus Diagonal Plane Shoulder Exercises on 18-30 Year Old Non-Athletes Jason Allred University of North Dakota Kevin O'Brien University of North Dakota Peter Tran University of North Dakota Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/pt-grad Part of the Physical Therapy Commons Recommended Citation Allred, Jason; O'Brien, Kevin; and Tran, Peter, "A Comparison of the Effects on Throwing Velocity of Straight Plane versus Diagonal Plane Shoulder Exercises on 18-30 Year Old Non-Athletes" (2005). Physical Therapy Scholarly Projects. 8. https://commons.und.edu/pt-grad/8 This Scholarly Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Physical Therapy at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physical Therapy Scholarly Projects by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS ON THROWING VELOCITY OF STRAIGHT PLANE VERSUS DIAGONAL PLANE SHOULDER EXERCISES ON 18-30 YEAR OLD NON-ATHLETES by Jason Allred Bachelor of Science University of Wyoming, 2002 Kevin O'Brien Bachelor of Arts, Bachelor of Science in Physical Therapy University of North Dakota, 2003 Peter Tran Bachelor of Science in Physical Therapy University of North Dakota, 2003 A Scholarly Project Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Department of Physical Therapy School of Medicine University. of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Physical Therapy Grand Forks, North Dakota May, 2005 This Scholarly Project, submitted by Jason Allred, Kevin O'Brien, and Peter Tran in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Physical Therapy from the University of North Dakota, has been read by the Advisor and Chairperson of Physical Therapy under whom the work has been done and is hereby approved.
    [Show full text]
  • Sternoclavicular Joint Allograft Reconstruction Using the Sternal Docking Technique
    JSES Open Access 2 (2018) 190−193 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect JSES Open Access journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jses Sternoclavicular joint allograft reconstruction using the sternal docking technique JoaquinD1XX Sanchez-SoteloD2X*X, YaserD3XX Baghdadi,D4XXNgocD5XX Tram V. NguyenD6XX Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA ARTICLE INFO Background: The sternoclavicular joint may become unstable as a result of trauma or medial clavicle resec- tion for arthritis. Allograft reconstruction with the figure-of-8 configuration is commonly used. This study Keywords: was conducted to determine the outcome of sternoclavicular joint reconstruction using an alternative graft Sternoclavicular joint configuration. instability Methods: Between 2005 and 2013, 19 sternoclavicular joint reconstructions were performed using a semite- semitendinous allograft ndinous allograft in a sternal docking configuration. The median age at surgery was 44 years (range, 15-79 allograft reconstruction years). Indications included instability in 16 (anterior, 13; posterior, 3) or medial clavicle resection for osteo- clavicle arthritis in 3. The median follow-up time was 3 years (range, 1-9 years). sternoclavicular docking technique Results: Two reconstructions (10.5%) underwent revision surgery, 1 additional patient had occasional subjec- tive instability, and the remaining 16 (84%) were considered stable. Sternoclavicular joint reconstruction led Level of evidence: Level IV, Case Series, < Treatment Study to improved pain (visual analog scale for pain subsided from 5 to 1 point, P .01), with pain being rated as mild or none for 15 shoulders. At the most recent follow-up, the median 11-item version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores were 11 (interquartile range [IQR], 0-41) and 88 (IQR, 62-100) respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Readingsample
    Color Atlas of Human Anatomy Vol. 1: Locomotor System Bearbeitet von Werner Platzer 6. durchges. Auflage 2008. Buch. ca. 480 S. ISBN 978 3 13 533306 9 Zu Inhaltsverzeichnis schnell und portofrei erhältlich bei Die Online-Fachbuchhandlung beck-shop.de ist spezialisiert auf Fachbücher, insbesondere Recht, Steuern und Wirtschaft. Im Sortiment finden Sie alle Medien (Bücher, Zeitschriften, CDs, eBooks, etc.) aller Verlage. Ergänzt wird das Programm durch Services wie Neuerscheinungsdienst oder Zusammenstellungen von Büchern zu Sonderpreisen. Der Shop führt mehr als 8 Millionen Produkte. 130 Upper Limb: Bones, Ligaments, Joints Radiocarpal and Midcarpal Joints Ligaments in the Region of the Wrist (A–E) (A–E) Four groups of ligaments can be distin- The radiocarpal or wrist joint is an ellip- guished: soid joint formed on one side by the radius (1) and the articular disk (2) and on the Ligaments which unite the forearm bones with other by the proximal row of carpal bones.Not the carpal bones (violet). These include the all the carpal bones of the proximal row are ulnar collateral ligament (8), the radial col- in continual contact with the socket- lateral ligament (9), the palmar radiocarpal shaped articular facet of the radius and the ligament (10), the dorsal radiocarpal liga- disk. The triquetrum (3), only makes close ment (11), and the palmar ulnocarpal liga- contact with the disk during ulnar abduc- ment (12). tion and loses contact on radial abduction. Ligaments which unite the carpal bones with The capsule of the wrist joint is lax, dorsally one another,orintercarpal ligaments (red). These comprise the radiate carpal ligament Upper Limb relatively thin, and is reinforced by numer- ous ligaments.
    [Show full text]
  • M1 – Muscled Arm
    M1 – Muscled Arm See diagram on next page 1. tendinous junction 38. brachial artery 2. dorsal interosseous muscles of hand 39. humerus 3. radial nerve 40. lateral epicondyle of humerus 4. radial artery 41. tendon of flexor carpi radialis muscle 5. extensor retinaculum 42. median nerve 6. abductor pollicis brevis muscle 43. flexor retinaculum 7. extensor carpi radialis brevis muscle 44. tendon of palmaris longus muscle 8. extensor carpi radialis longus muscle 45. common palmar digital nerves of 9. brachioradialis muscle median nerve 10. brachialis muscle 46. flexor pollicis brevis muscle 11. deltoid muscle 47. adductor pollicis muscle 12. supraspinatus muscle 48. lumbrical muscles of hand 13. scapular spine 49. tendon of flexor digitorium 14. trapezius muscle superficialis muscle 15. infraspinatus muscle 50. superficial transverse metacarpal 16. latissimus dorsi muscle ligament 17. teres major muscle 51. common palmar digital arteries 18. teres minor muscle 52. digital synovial sheath 19. triangular space 53. tendon of flexor digitorum profundus 20. long head of triceps brachii muscle muscle 21. lateral head of triceps brachii muscle 54. annular part of fibrous tendon 22. tendon of triceps brachii muscle sheaths 23. ulnar nerve 55. proper palmar digital nerves of ulnar 24. anconeus muscle nerve 25. medial epicondyle of humerus 56. cruciform part of fibrous tendon 26. olecranon process of ulna sheaths 27. flexor carpi ulnaris muscle 57. superficial palmar arch 28. extensor digitorum muscle of hand 58. abductor digiti minimi muscle of hand 29. extensor carpi ulnaris muscle 59. opponens digiti minimi muscle of 30. tendon of extensor digitorium muscle hand of hand 60. superficial branch of ulnar nerve 31.
    [Show full text]