DOCSLIB.ORG

Bones, Joints and Muscles of the Upper and Lower Limbs Study Guide

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bones, Joints and Muscles of the Upper and Lower Limbs Study Guide Comenius University in Bratislava Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin Department of Anatomy BONES, JOINTS AND MUSCLES OF THE UPPER AND LOWER LIMBS STUDY GUIDE MUDr. Gabriela Hešková, PhD. Doc. MUDr. Desanka Výbohová, PhD. Doc. MUDr. Yvetta Mellová, CSc. Martin, 2018 2 Authors: MUDr. Gabriela Hešková, PhD. Doc. MUDr. Desanka Výbohová, PhD. Doc. MUDr. Yvetta Mellová, CSc. Authors themselves are responsible for the content and English of the chapters. Reviewers: Prof. MUDr. Marian Adamkov, CSc. MUDr. Mária Semáneková, PhD. Copyright © 2018 Authors of the Department of the Anatomy Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin of the Comenius University in Bratislava All rights reserved. ISBN 978-80-8187-049-1 788081 870491 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 4 PREFACE .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 8 SHORT INTRODUCTION TO SKELETON OF THE UPPER LIMB AND LOWER LIMB ..................... 9 SKELETON OF THE UPPER LIMB ............................................................................................................... 10 SCAPULA ........................................................................................................................................................ 10 CLAVICLE ...................................................................................................................................................... 13 HUMERUS ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 RADIUS ........................................................................................................................................................... 20 ULNA ............................................................................................................................................................... 23 CARPAL BONES ............................................................................................................................................ 26 METACARPAL BONES ................................................................................................................................. 30 PHALANGES .................................................................................................................................................. 31 SKELETON OF THE LOWER LIMB ............................................................................................................. 34 HIP BONE ........................................................................................................................................................ 34 FEMUR ............................................................................................................................................................ 41 TIBIA ............................................................................................................................................................... 47 FIBULA ............................................................................................................................................................ 51 TARSAL BONES ............................................................................................................................................. 55 TALUS ............................................................................................................................................................. 56 CALCANEUS .................................................................................................................................................. 58 NAVICULAR BONE ....................................................................................................................................... 60 CUNEIFORM BONES ..................................................................................................................................... 60 CUBOID BONE ............................................................................................................................................... 61 METARSAL BONES ....................................................................................................................................... 61 PHALANGES .................................................................................................................................................. 62 SESAMOID BONES OF THE FOOT .............................................................................................................. 63 SHORT INTRODUCTION TO ARTHROLOGY (SYNDESMOLOGY) ..................................................... 66 4 SOLID JOINTS ................................................................................................................................................... 66 SYNOVIAL JOINTS .......................................................................................................................................... 67 JOINTS OF THE UPPER LIMB ...................................................................................................................... 70 STERNOCLAVICULAR JOINT ..................................................................................................................... 70 ACROMIOCLAVICULAR JOINT .................................................................................................................. 71 PECTORAL GIRDLE MOVEMENTS ................................................................................................................. 72 SHOULDER JOINT ......................................................................................................................................... 73 ELBOW JOINT ................................................................................................................................................ 77 INTEROSSEOUS MEMBRANE OF THE FOREARM .................................................................................. 81 DISTAL RADIOULNAR JOINT ..................................................................................................................... 81 RADIOCARPAL JOINT (WRIST JOINT) ..................................................................................................... 82 MIDCARPAL JOINT, INTERCARPAL JOINTS AND CARPOMETACARPAL JOINTS .......................... 84 METACARPOPHALANGEAL JOINTS ......................................................................................................... 86 INTERPHALANGEAL JOINTS ..................................................................................................................... 86 JOINTS OF THE LOWER LIMB .................................................................................................................... 90 SACROILIAC JOINT ...................................................................................................................................... 90 PUBIC SYMPHYSIS ....................................................................................................................................... 91 LIGAMENTS OF THE PELVIS ........................................................................................................................... 92 GENDER DIFFERENCES IN BONY PELVIS .................................................................................................... 94 HIP (COXAL) JOINT ...................................................................................................................................... 96 KNEE (GENUAL) JOINT.............................................................................................................................. 101 TIBIOFIBULAR JOINT ................................................................................................................................ 106 INTEROSSEOUS MEMBRANE OF THE LEG ........................................................................................... 106 TIBIOFIBULAR SYNDESMOSIS ................................................................................................................ 107 ANKLE (TALOCRURAL) JOINT ................................................................................................................ 107 TALOCALCANEAL (SUBTALAR) JOINT ................................................................................................. 110 TALOCALCANEONAVICULAR JOINT .................................................................................................... 111 CALCANEOCUBOID JOINT ....................................................................................................................... 112 CUNEONAVICULAR ( NAVICULOCUNEIFORM) JOINTS .................................................................... 113 CUBOIDEONAVICULAR JOINT (SYNDESMOSIS) ................................................................................. 113 5 CUNEOCUBOID AND INTERCUNEIFORM JOINTS .............................................................................. 113 TARSOMETATARSAL JOINTS AND INTERMETATARSAL JOINTS ................................................. 114 METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINTS ......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Skeletal Foot Structure
    Foot Skeletal Structure The disarticulated bones of the left foot, from above (The talus and calcaneus remain articulated) 1 Calcaneus 2 Talus 3 Navicular 4 Medial cuneiform 5 Intermediate cuneiform 6 Lateral cuneiform 7 Cuboid 8 First metatarsal 9 Second metatarsal 10 Third metatarsal 11 Fourth metatarsal 12 Fifth metatarsal 13 Proximal phalanx of great toe 14 Distal phalanx of great toe 15 Proximal phalanx of second toe 16 Middle phalanx of second toe 17 Distal phalanx of second toe Bones of the tarsus, the back part of the foot Talus Calcaneus Navicular bone Cuboid bone Medial, intermediate and lateral cuneiform bones Bones of the metatarsus, the forepart of the foot First to fifth metatarsal bones (numbered from the medial side) Bones of the toes or digits Phalanges -- a proximal and a distal phalanx for the great toe; proximal, middle and distal phalanges for the second to fifth toes Sesamoid bones Two always present in the tendons of flexor hallucis brevis Origin and meaning of some terms associated with the foot Tibia: Latin for a flute or pipe; the shin bone has a fanciful resemblance to this wind instrument. Fibula: Latin for a pin or skewer; the long thin bone of the leg. Adjective fibular or peroneal, which is from the Greek for pin. Tarsus: Greek for a wicker frame; the basic framework for the back of the foot. Metatarsus: Greek for beyond the tarsus; the forepart of the foot. Talus (astragalus): Latin (Greek) for one of a set of dice; viewed from above the main part of the talus has a rather square appearance.
    [Show full text]
  • Fractures of the Anterior Process of the Calcaneum; a Review and Proposed Treatment Algorithm
    Foot and Ankle Surgery 25 (2019) 258–263 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Foot and Ankle Surgery journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/fas Review Fractures of the anterior process of the calcaneum; a review and proposed treatment algorithm a, b b b b Baljinder S. Dhinsa *, Ahmed Latif , Roland Walker , Ali Abbasian , Diane Back , b Sam Singh a William Harvey Hospital, Kennington Road, Willesborough, Ashford TN24 0LZ, United Kingdom b Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Background: There remains a lack of recognition of these fractures, which leads to a delay in diagnosis and Received 18 June 2017 appropriate management. Received in revised form 1 February 2018 Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed. Following inclusion and exclusion criteria, Accepted 3 February 2018 23 studies were available for analysis. Results: Delay in diagnosis is common and has a negative impact on outcome. If an APC fracture is Keywords: suspected; anteroposterior, lateral and oblique plain radiographs should be requested. Further Fracture investigation with computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging is indicated if plain Calcaneum radiographs are inconclusive and patient remains symptomatic. Non-operative measures are usually Anterior process Avulsion adequate for most undisplaced fractures, however surgical intervention maybe required for large, intra- Compression articular fractures in the acute setting and for non-union. Calcaneocuboid Conclusions: A treatment algorithm is suggested that may help with the diagnosis and management of these injuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Ligaments of the Costovertebral Joints Including Biomechanics, Innervations, and Clinical Applications: a Comprehensive Review W
    Open Access Review Article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.874 Ligaments of the Costovertebral Joints including Biomechanics, Innervations, and Clinical Applications: A Comprehensive Review with Application to Approaches to the Thoracic Spine Erfanul Saker 1 , Rachel A. Graham 2 , Renee Nicholas 3 , Anthony V. D’Antoni 2 , Marios Loukas 1 , Rod J. Oskouian 4 , R. Shane Tubbs 5 1. Department of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University School of Medicine, Grenada, West Indies 2. Department of Anatomy, The Sophie Davis School of Biomedical Education 3. Department of Physical Therapy, Samford University 4. Neurosurgery, Complex Spine, Swedish Neuroscience Institute 5. Neurosurgery, Seattle Science Foundation Corresponding author: Erfanul Saker, [email protected] Abstract Few studies have examined the costovertebral joint and its ligaments in detail. Therefore, the following review was performed to better elucidate their anatomy, function and involvement in pathology. Standard search engines were used to find studies concerning the costovertebral joints and ligaments. These often- overlooked ligaments of the body serve important functions in maintaining appropriate alignment between the ribs and spine. With an increasing interest in minimally invasive approaches to the thoracic spine and an improved understanding of the function and innervation of these ligaments, surgeons and clinicians should have a good working knowledge of these structures. Categories: Neurosurgery, Orthopedics, Rheumatology Keywords: costovertebral joint, spine, anatomy, thoracic Introduction And Background The costovertebral joint ligaments are relatively unknown and frequently overlooked anatomical structures [1]. Although small and short in size, they are abundant, comprising 108 costovertebral ligaments in the normal human thoracic spine, and they are essential to its stability and function [2-3].
    [Show full text]
  • Defining the Morphometrics of the First Metacarpal for the Development of an Osseointegrated Prosthesis
    Defining the Morphometrics of the First Metacarpal for the Development of an Osseointegrated Prosthesis Authors: JJ Vaux OMS-IV1, RR Hugate, M.D.2, JW Hills3, RF Grzybowski, D.O.4, CK Funk. Ph.D.1 Affiliations: 1Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, 2Colorado Limb Consultants, 3Dept of Materials and Mechanical Engineering, Denver University, 4Diversified Radiology Objective: Amputation of the thumb presents a serious insult to the hand and can result in up to a 22% loss of functionality in that limb (2,3). To date, several different techniques have been explored for reconstruction of the thumb, however none seem to be incredibly successful (1,4). We believe the answer lies in an osseointegrated prosthesis within the first metacarpal. In order to successfully create an osseointegrated prosthesis, the morphometrics of the first metacarpal are needed. The aim of this study was to define the geometry of the first metacarpal in order to help create a standardized set of stems and prostheses to treat patients who have suffered amputation of the thumb at the level of the first metacarpal phalangeal joint (MCPJ). Methods: A total of eighty first metacarpals from forty-one cadavers were studied. All soft tissues were removed and the first metacarpals were imaged by computed tomography (CT). Three-dimensional models were constructed using cuts from the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes. Using a HyperMesh software, the individual first metacarpals were analyzed and measurements were taken for overall length, radius of curvature, medullary canal diameter, cortical thickness, and distance from the distal end to the center of the isthmus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Natural Joint Systems and Numerical Investigation of Bio-Inspired GFRP-To-Steel Joints
    materials Article A Review of Natural Joint Systems and Numerical Investigation of Bio-Inspired GFRP-to-Steel Joints Evangelos I. Avgoulas and Michael P. F. Sutcliffe * Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +44-1223-332-996 Academic Editor: Frank Müller Received: 25 April 2016; Accepted: 1 July 2016; Published: 12 July 2016 Abstract: There are a great variety of joint types used in nature which can inspire engineering joints. In order to design such biomimetic joints, it is at first important to understand how biological joints work. A comprehensive literature review, considering natural joints from a mechanical point of view, was undertaken. This was used to develop a taxonomy based on the different methods/functions that nature successfully uses to attach dissimilar tissues. One of the key methods that nature uses to join dissimilar materials is a transitional zone of stiffness at the insertion site. This method was used to propose bio-inspired solutions with a transitional zone of stiffness at the joint site for several glass fibre reinforced plastic (GFRP) to steel adhesively bonded joint configurations. The transition zone was used to reduce the material stiffness mismatch of the joint parts. A numerical finite element model was used to identify the optimum variation in material stiffness that minimises potential failure of the joint. The best bio-inspired joints showed a 118% increase of joint strength compared to the standard joints. Keywords: natural joints; adhesive joints; biomimetics; bio-inspiration; composites 1. Introduction In recent years, the use of composite materials in automotive and aerospace industries has shown an upward trend due to their good stiffness-to-weight (E/r) and strength-to-weight (s/r) ratios.
    [Show full text]
  • Part 1 the Thorax ECA1 7/18/06 6:30 PM Page 2 ECA1 7/18/06 6:30 PM Page 3
    ECA1 7/18/06 6:30 PM Page 1 Part 1 The Thorax ECA1 7/18/06 6:30 PM Page 2 ECA1 7/18/06 6:30 PM Page 3 Surface anatomy and surface markings The experienced clinician spends much of his working life relating the surface anatomy of his patients to their deep structures (Fig. 1; see also Figs. 11 and 22). The following bony prominences can usually be palpated in the living subject (corresponding vertebral levels are given in brackets): •◊◊superior angle of the scapula (T2); •◊◊upper border of the manubrium sterni, the suprasternal notch (T2/3); •◊◊spine of the scapula (T3); •◊◊sternal angle (of Louis) — the transverse ridge at the manubrio-sternal junction (T4/5); •◊◊inferior angle of scapula (T8); •◊◊xiphisternal joint (T9); •◊◊lowest part of costal margin—10th rib (the subcostal line passes through L3). Note from Fig. 1 that the manubrium corresponds to the 3rd and 4th thoracic vertebrae and overlies the aortic arch, and that the sternum corre- sponds to the 5th to 8th vertebrae and neatly overlies the heart. Since the 1st and 12th ribs are difficult to feel, the ribs should be enu- merated from the 2nd costal cartilage, which articulates with the sternum at the angle of Louis. The spinous processes of all the thoracic vertebrae can be palpated in the midline posteriorly, but it should be remembered that the first spinous process that can be felt is that of C7 (the vertebra prominens). The position of the nipple varies considerably in the female, but in the male it usually lies in the 4th intercostal space about 4in (10cm) from the midline.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 9-10 Ligaments of the Wrist and Their Function
    Function and Movement of the Hand 283 Table 9-10 Ligaments of the Wrist and Their Function Extrinsic Ligaments Function Palmar radiocarpal Volarly stabilizes radius to carpal bones; limits excessive wrist extension Dorsal radiocarpal Dorsally stabilizes radius to carpal bones; limits excessive wrist flexion Ulnar collateral Provides lateral stability of ulnar side of wrist between ulna and carpals Radial collateral Provides lateral stability of radial side of wrist between radius and carpals Ulnocarpal complex and articular Stabilizes and helps glide the ulnar side of wrist; stabilizes distal disk (or triangular fibrocartilage radioulnar joint complex) Intrinsic Ligaments Palmar midcarpal Forms and stabilizes the proximal and distal rows of carpal bones Dorsal midcarpal Forms and stabilizes the proximal and distal rows of carpal bones Interosseous Intervenes between each carpal bone contained within its proximal or distal row Accessory Ligament Transverse carpal Stabilizes carpal arch and contents of the carpal tunnel Adapted from Hertling, D., & Kessler, R. (2006). Management of common musculoskeletal disorders: Physical therapy principles and methods. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.; Oatis, C. A. (2004). Kinesiology: The mechanics and pathomechanics of human movement. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.; Weiss, S., & Falkenstein, N. (2005). Hand rehabilitation: A quick reference guide and review. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier. The radial and ulnar collateral ligaments provide lateral and medial support, respectively, to the wrist joint. The ulnocarpal complex is more likely to be referred to as the triangular fibro- cartilage complex (TFCC) and includes the articular disk of the wrist. The TFCC is the major stabilizer of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and can tear after direct compressive force such as a fall on an outstretched hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Degenerative Joint Disease
    DEGENERATIVE JOINT DISEASE As our pets age, the tissues lining the bones and joints may deteriorate and degenerate. Degenerative Joint Disease (DJD) describes chronic arthritis (osteoarthritis) which is a gradual deterioration of articular cartilage within the joints. What is DJD? Joints consist of a tough fibrous joint capsule joining the bones. The joint capsule is lined by a thin membrane which produces joint fluid. This acts as a lubricant and also carries nourishment to the spongy articular cartilage which covers the ends of the bones. The articular cartilage does not have any blood supply of its own to provide nourishment and oxygen. The articular cartilage receives nourishment from small vessels in the underlying bone and through absorption from the joint fluid. DJD can follow a number of joint diseases including infection and surgery. It also occurs from excessive weight and obesity. This smooth resilient cartilage degenerates and becomes brittle and may actually split from the bone and become detached within the joint. Although DJD is said to be non-inflammatory, mild inflammation plays a part in causing clinical signs. The damaged cells of the cartilage release substances which result in inflammation, pain and further damage to the cartilage. Thus, once DJD begins it can become a vicious cycle. Can the condition be cured? Most of the damage caused by DJD is irreversible. Fortunately, new products are available that can slow the progress of the disease and promote cartilage healing. In addition, modern analgesics can effectively control pain without few side effects. We will discuss treatment options to allow your pet to enjoy a happy, pain free life.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitate Metastases in Adenocarcinoma Lung: a Rare
    Case Report Capitate Metastases in Adenocarcinoma PROVISIONAL PDF Lung: A Rare Occurrence Jaspreet KAUR1, Renu MADAN1, Maneesh Kumar VIJAY2, Pramod Kumar JULKA1, Goura Kishore RATH1 Submitted: 21 May 2014 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, DR BRA Institute Rotary Cancer Accepted: 19 Nov 2014 Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India 2 Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India Abstract Metastatic carcinoma is the most common malignancy of the bone. Metastases to the upper limbs of the skeleton are extremely uncommon, with only 10–15% occurring in this region. Metastases to the hand and wrist comprise about 0.15% of all hand tumours, and only 0.1% of all metastases. Carpal bone metastases are much rarer than those to the metacarpal and phalangeal bones. They usually masquerade as more common hand pathology such as arthritis or osteomyelitis. Given the bleak prognosis of carpal metastatic disease in lung cancer, treatment of a metastasis to the hand is usually palliative. Contrary to earlier beliefs, palliative radiotherapy plays a significant role in pain relief and improving hand mobility in patients diagnosed with metastatic disease of the hand. We report a case of adenocarcinoma of the lung with metastases to the capitate bone of the carpus treated with palliative radiotherapy. Keywords: carpal bone, metastases, lung cancer, palliative, radiotherapy Introduction Case report Metastatic carcinoma is the most common A 52-year-old male presented with fever, left- malignancy of the bone. The skeleton is the sided chest pain and pain in the right wrist for two third most common site of metastases after months.
    [Show full text]
  • Carpals and Tarsals of Mule Deer, Black Bear and Human: an Osteology Guide for the Archaeologist
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship 2009 Carpals and tarsals of mule deer, black bear and human: an osteology guide for the archaeologist Tamela S. Smart Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Smart, Tamela S., "Carpals and tarsals of mule deer, black bear and human: an osteology guide for the archaeologist" (2009). WWU Graduate School Collection. 19. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/19 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MASTER'S THESIS In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master's degree at Western Washington University, I grant to Western Washington University the non-exclusive royalty-free right to archive, reproduce, distribute, and display the thesis in any and all forms, including electronic format, via any digital library mechanisms maintained by WWu. I represent and warrant this is my original work, and does not infringe or violate any rights of others. I warrant that I have obtained written permissions from the owner of any third party copyrighted material included in these files. I acknowledge that I retain ownership rights to the copyright of this work, including but not limited to the right to use all or part of this work in future works, such as articles or books.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carpometacarpal Joint of the Thumb: MR Appearance in Asymptomatic Volunteers
    Skeletal Radiol (2013) 42:1105–1112 DOI 10.1007/s00256-013-1633-4 SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE The carpometacarpal joint of the thumb: MR appearance in asymptomatic volunteers Anna Hirschmann & Reto Sutter & Andreas Schweizer & Christian W. A. Pfirrmann Received: 23 January 2013 /Revised: 1 April 2013 /Accepted: 21 April 2013 /Published online: 15 May 2013 # ISS 2013 Abstract subjects. The AOL showed a variable SI (36 %/42 % low, Purpose To prospectively characterize the MR appearance 27 %/27 % increased, 36 %/30 % striated). The IML was the of the carpometacarpal (CMC) joint of the thumb in asymp- thickest ligament with a mean of 2.9 mm/3.1 mm and the tomatic volunteers. DRL the thinnest (1.2 mm/1.4 mm). There was a mean Materials and methods Thirty-four asymptomatic volun- dorsal subluxation of 1.8 mm/2.0 mm and radial subluxation teers (17 women, 17 men, mean age, 33.9±9.2 years) of 2.8 mm/3.4 mm of the metacarpal base. The AOL was underwent MR imaging of the thumb after approval by the significantly thicker in men (1.7 mm) than in women local ethical committee. Two musculoskeletal radiologists (1.2 mm; p=0.02). Radial subluxation was significantly independently classified visibility and signal intensity (SI) larger in men (3.4 mm) than in women (2.2 mm; p=0.02). characteristics of the anterior oblique (AOL/beak ligament), No subluxation in palmar or ulnar direction was seen. the posterior oblique (POL), the intermetacarpal (IML), and Conclusions Radial and dorsal subluxation of the CMC the dorsoradial ligaments (DRL) on a three-point Likert joint can be a normal finding in a resting position at MR scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultrasonograpic Assessment of Relationship Between the Palmaris Longus Tendon and the Flexor Retinacular Ligament and the Palmar Aponeurosis of the Hand
    Original Article Ultrasonograpic Assessment of Relationship Between the Palmaris Longus Tendon and the Flexor Retinacular Ligament and the Palmar Aponeurosis of the Hand Kadir Ertem1, Ahmet Sığırcı2, Salih Karaca1, Aykut Sığırcı3, Yunus Karakoç4, Saim Yoloğlu5 İnonu University, Faculty of Medicine, ABSTRACT Departments of Orthopedics and Trauma- tology1, Radioloy2, Physiology4 and Biosta- Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the presence of the Palmaris Longus tistics5, Malatya, Turkey Tendon (PLT) and the relationship between the Flexor Retinacular Ligament (FRL) and the Palmar Aponeurosis (PA) of the hand. 319 Mayıs University, Faculty of Medicine, Departments of Orthopaedics and Trauma- Method: 62 voluntary subjects (31 female, 31 male students and per- tology, Samsun, Turkey sonnel from the Inonu University, at the average age 28.38 ± 6.86 years ranging from 19 to 48 years) took part in this study using ultrasound. Eur J Gen Med 2010;7(2):161-166 Received: 16.05.2009 Result: Significant differences were found in the PA p-m-d diameters of subjects between with and without PLT bilaterally, on the right Accepted: 06.07.2009 and the left hand (p<0.05), whereas there was no meaningful differ- ence considering FRL diameters (p>0.05). Furthermore, this ultraso- nographic assessment revealed the continuity of collagen bunches of the PL tendon up to FRL, but not PA. Conclusion: Although not demonstrated by ultrasonography here, the increased thickness of the PA in subjects with a PLT supports the find- ings in the literature in which the structural
    [Show full text]