DOCSLIB.ORG

Downloaded 10/10/21 09:06 PM UTC Bulletin American Meteorological Society 1059

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Downloaded 10/10/21 09:06 PM UTC Bulletin American Meteorological Society 1059 John F. Griffiths A Chronology ol llems of Department of Meteorology Texas A8cM University Meteorological interest College Station, Tex. 77843 Any attempt to select important events in meteorology The importance of some events was not really recog- must be a personal choice. I have tried to be objective nized until years later (note the correspondence by and, additionally, have had input from some of my Haurwitz in the August 1966 BULLETIN, p. 659, concern- colleagues in the Department of Meteorology. Neverthe- ing Coriolis's contribution) and therefore, strictly, did less, I am likely to have omissions from the list, and I not contribute to the development of meteorology. No would welcome any suggestions (and corrections) from weather phenomena, such as the dates of extreme hurri- interested readers. Naturally, there were many sources canes, tornadoes, or droughts, have been included in this of reference, too many to list, but the METEOROLOGICAL present listing. Fewer individuals are given in the more AND GEOASTROPHYSICAL ABSTRACTS, Sir Napier Shaw's recent years for it is easier to identify milestones of a Handbook of Meteorology (vol. 1), "Meteorologische science when many years have passed. 1 Geschichstabellen" by C. Kassner, and One Hundred i Linke, F. (Ed.), 1951: Meteorologisches Taschenbuch, vol. Years of International Co-operation in Meteorology I, 2nd ed., Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Geest & Portig, (1873-1973) (WMO No. 345) were most useful. Leipzig, pp. 330-359. (1st ed., 1931.) B.C. 1066 CHOU dynasty was founded in China, during which official records were kept that in- cluded climatic descriptions. #600 THALES attributed the yearly Nile River floods to wind changes. #550 ANAXIMANDER gave first known correct definition of wind as "a flowing of air." *500 PARMENIDES classified world climates according to latitude—torrid, temperate, and frigid. Phenological calendar was introduced in CHINA to assist farmers. *450 EMPEDOCLES' theory of universe, that earth, air, fire, and water constitute the universe, dominated meteorology for 2000 years. *400 HIPPOCRATES' treatise on "Airs, Waters and Places," first expressed idea that weather molds the life of man. Public notices displayed in GREEK cities gave information on wind direction. Rainfall measurements were made in INDIA. #370 EUDOXUS'S book on bad-weather predictions claimed there was a periodicity in weather phenomena. 334 ARISTOTLE'S Meteorologica, was the first work on the science of the atmosphere. 330 THEOPHRASTUS (pupil of Aristotle) wrote treatises "On Winds" and "On the Signs of Rain, Wind, Storms and Fair Weather." 278 ARATUS wrote Book of Signs, concerned with weather lore. 140 HIPPARCHUS used a zonation of the world depending upon day length at summer solstice. *100 ANDRONICUS KYRRHESTES designed the Tower of the Winds in Athens. A.D. 61 SENECA complained of the air pollution in Rome. * 130 PTOLEMY used a climatic classification of 7-day-length zones, extending to 62°N. *400 Liu THIEN CHUN was made Comptroller-General of Crops and Weather in China. * An approximate date. 23 Vol. 58, No. 10, October 1977 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/10/21 09:06 PM UTC Bulletin American Meteorological Society 1059 825 DISCUIL (Irish monk) commented on lack of ice around Iceland as being different from the report of PYTHEAS in 300 B.C. 850 AGOBARD (Archbishop of Lyons) railed against those claiming to control the weather in "The Absurd Opinion of the Vulgar Touching Hail and Thunder." 1150 WILLIAM OF CONCHES made many sound deductions concerning humidity and clouds, oceans, and wind currents. *1200 IDRISI (Arab scientist) used 7 climatic zones, each of 10 divisions. 1269-70 A weather diary exists, most likely referring to conditions at OXFORD. 1337-44 REV. WILLIAM MERLE recorded weather conditions at OXFORD and LINCOLN, ENGLAND. 1442 Rain gages were in use in KOREA. #1450 CARDINAL NICOLAUS DA CUSA noted humidity changes by weighing a bundle of wool. #1500 LEONARD DA VINCI invented hygrometer and designed a pressure-plate anemometer. 1535 Estimates of annual rainfall for VALPARAISO-SANTIAGO, CHILE, exist from this date. 1555 LEONARD DYGGES wrote a book on weather prognostician (how to judge the weather for ever!!). # 1580 GIAMBATTISTA DELLA PORTA reported on simple oat-beard hygroscopes he had seen in use (see 1665). 1586 SIMON SEVINUS'S book Statics and Hydrostatics was published. 1593 GALILEO GALILEI (or his pupil SANTORIO) invented the air thermometer. 1611 MARCO DE DOMINUS published a scientific explanation of the rainbow. 1632 JEAN RAY constructed a water thermometer. 1637 RENE DESCARTES'S appendix "Les Meteores" to his famous work Discours de la Methode led to the break from Aristotle's influence in meteorology. 1639 Rainfall was measured in ITALY, the gage being invented by CASTELLI (pupil of Galileo). *1640 GASPARO BERTI experimented with vacuums and pressure devices. 1643 EVANGELISTA TORRICELLI invented the barometer and with VINCENZIO VIVIANI developed a hygrometer. 1644 First weather records in America were made near WILMINGTON, DEL., by REV. JOHN CAMPANIUS. 1648 BLAISE PASCAL designed experiment in which PERIER ascended the Puy-de-Dome, France, and registered decrease of pressure with height. 1653 FERDINAND II OF TUSCANY created a network of observing stations. 1659 ROBERT BOYLE propounded his law of the relationship between volume and pressure. *1660 Dew point hygrometer was constructed in FLORENCE. 1660 VON GUERICKE noted that a severe storm follows a sudden drop in barometric pressure. 1661 JOHN EVELYN published Fumifugium, a discussion of air pollution in LONDON. 1662 SIR CHRISTOPHER WREN invented a self-recording, tipping bucket rain gage. 1664 Rainfall observations began in PARIS. 1665 ROBERT BOYLE described a hygroscope made of an oat beard. 1667 ROBERT HOOKE published details of an anemometer. JOHN LOCKE began thermometric readings at OXFORD. * 1670 Mercury replaced water or spirit in thermometers. 1670 Weather observations began in CHARLESTON, S.C. 1683 EDMUND HALLEY published first comprehensive map of winds. Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/10/21 09:06 PM UTC Vol. 58, No. 10, October 1977 1686 EDMUND HALLEY (called Father of Dynamical Meteorology) explained trade wind and monsoon circulations. 1687 ISAAC NEWTON developed his three laws of motion. 1690 CHRISTIAN HUYGENS'S treatise on theory of light was published (written in 1678). 1693 WILLIAM DAMPIER began collecting information on the distribution of winds. 1694 EDMUND HALLEY conducted experiment showing the effect of sun and wind on evapora- tion. 1697 Monthly precipitation records exist from this date for KEW, ENGLAND, although 1717- 1723 has been estimated. -1716 WILLIAM DERHAM took temperature and rainfall readings at UPMINSTER, ENGLAND. 1710 GABRIEL DANIEL FAHRENHEIT developed his 32°-212° temperature scale. 1716 EDMUND HALLEY described the great auroral display of 6 March and advanced theories for the causes. 1722 First description of daily fluctuations of pressure was made. 1723 JAMES JURIN proposed that the Royal Society collect yearly weather data worldwide. 1725 Rainfall figures exist from this date for PADUA, ITALY, and LENINGRAD, U.S.S.R. 1727 JOHANN DANIEL PERLICKY published a paper on the development of a dew meter. 1729 PIERRE BOUGUER wrote treatise entitled "Optical Essay on Measurement of Light." 1730 RENE ANTOINE FERCHAULT DE REAMUR developed his 0°-80° temperature scale. 1731 JEAN-JACQUES DORTOUS DE MAIRAN published the Physical and Historical Treatise on the Aurora Borealis. 1735 GEORGE HADLEY developed his theory linking the earth's rotation and the trade winds. 1736 ROBERT MARSHAM began phenological records near NORWICH, ENGLAND. >6-98 THOMAS BARKER took meteorological records at LYNDON, ENGLAND. 1737 ANDERS CELSIUS developed his 100°-0° temperature scale. 1738 First systematic instrument records in America were taken at CHARLESTON, S.C. 1742 Celsius scale revised to 0°-100° by CARL VON LINNE (LINNAEUS), DANIEL EKSTORM, or JEAN PIERRE CHRISTIN. 1743 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN deduced the progressive movement of a hurricane. 1746 J. H. WINKLER propounded idea that lightning is an electric discharge. 1749 ALEXANDER WILSON and MELVILLE took first upper air observations using a minimum thermometer on a kite in SCOTLAND. 1750 CARL VON LINNE established network of 18 phenological stations in SWEDEN. GEORGE WILHELM RICHMANN observed phenomenon of depression of wet bulb. 1751 CHARLES LE ROY recognized dew point temperature as point of saturation of the air. 1752 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN demonstrated that lightning is an electrical phenomenon. 1755 LEONARD EULER used Newton's second law and the concepts of partial differential equa- tions to develop equations of fluid motion. 1760 JOSEPH BLACK formulated the concept of latent heat. 1774 LOUIS COTTE wrote Treatise on Meteorology. 1777 MATHEW DOBSON measured evaporation and analyzed data in LIVERPOOL, ENGLAND. 1780 Meteorological Society of MANNHEIM established 39 weather observing stations, using standardized equipment, in various countries (4 in America). Systematic weather records began at NEW HAVEN, CONN. Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/10/21 09:06 PM UTC Bulletin American Meteorological Society 1061 1782 JAMES SIX invented his maximum-minimum thermometer. 1783 JACQUES ALEXANDER CESAR CHARLES made hydrogen balloon flight measuring temperature and pressure in PARIS. HORACE BENEDICT DE SAUSSURE published "Essai sur l'Hygrometrie" and invented the hair hygrometer. *1784 Concept of variation of temperature with height was suggested. 1785 Rainfall
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ocabulary of Definitions : P
    Service bibliothèque Catalogue historique de la bibliothèque de l’Observatoire de Nice Source : Monographie de l’Observatoire de Nice / Charles Garnier, 1892. Marc Heller © Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur Février 2012 Présentation << On trouve… à l’Ouest … la bibliothèque avec ses six mille deux cents volumes et ses trentes journaux ou recueils périodiques…. >> (Façade principale de la Bibliothèque / Phot. attribuée à Michaud A. – 188? - Marc Heller © Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur) C’est en ces termes qu’Henri Joseph Anastase Perrotin décrivait la bibliothèque de l’Observatoire de Nice en 1899 dans l’introduction du tome 1 des Annales de l’Observatoire de Nice 1. Un catalogue des revues et ouvrages 2 classé par ordre alphabétique d’auteurs et de lieux décrivait le fonds historique de la bibliothèque. 1 Introduction, Annales de l’Observatoire de Nice publiés sous les auspices du Bureau des longitudes par M. Perrotin. Paris,Gauthier-Villars,1899, Tome 1,p. XIV 2 Catalogue de la bibliothèque, Annales de l’Observatoire de Nice publiés sous les auspices du Bureau des longitudes par M. Perrotin. Paris,Gauthier-Villars,1899, Tome 1,p. 1 Le présent document est une version remaniée, complétée et enrichie de ce catalogue. (Bibliothèque, vue de l’intérieur par le photogr. Jean Giletta, 191?. - Marc Heller © Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur) Chaque référence est reproduite à l’identique. Elle est complétée par une notice bibliographique et éventuellement par un lien électronique sur la version numérisée. Les titres et documents non encore identifiés sont signalés en italique. Un index des auteurs et des titres de revues termine le document.
    [Show full text]
  • William Derham: Csillagteológia () Forrásközlés Történeti-Fi Lológiai Bevezetéssel Szénási Réka – Vassányi Miklós
    William Derham: Csillagteológia () Forrásközlés történeti-fi lológiai bevezetéssel Szénási Réka – Vassányi Miklós 1. Derham és a fi ziko-teológia. William Derham (1657-1735) anglikán lelkész polihisztor, természettudós, a Royal Society tagja és a fi ziko-teológiai mozgalom jeles alakja volt. Az alábbi részletet egyik fő művéből, az Astro-Th eology-ból az- zal a céllal közöljük, hogy betekintést nyújtsunk a kora újkori natural theology – kozmikus vagy fi ziko-teológia – egyik nagy hatású angol műhelyébe, és ezáltal megmutassuk, hogy a korszak egy paradigmatikus fi gurája, a természettudós-lelki- pásztor (parson-naturalist) Derham hogyan egyeztette össze a vallást a természet- tudománnyal, illetve – pontosabban – hogyan állította a természetismeretet a hit, az apologetika és a térítés szolgálatába. A többkötetes, népszerű szerző nem volt ugyan hivatásos fi zikus vagy csillagász, de rendszeresen felolvasott a Royal Society ülésein, jó negyven hozzájárulással gazdagította annak folyóiratát, a Philosophical Transactionst, és voltak eredeti fi zikatudományi eredményei (hangsebesség méré- se), valamint technológiai munkássága is (óramechanika), tehát a kor mércéjével mérve természettudósnak is számított. Egész életére kiterjedő lelkészi működését végigkísérte a természettudomány több területének – orvostudomány, biológia, geológia, meteorológia, csillagászat – különösen megfi gyelő tudósként való mű- velése. A természettudomány és a vallás termékeny összekapcsolására mindenek- előtt a nevezetes Boyle Lectures (ld. alant) felkért előadójaként
    [Show full text]
  • THE 19Th CENTURY GERMAN DIARY of a NEW JERSEY GEOLOGIST
    THE 19th CENTURY GERMAN DIARY OF A NEW JERSEY GEOLOGIST BY WILLIAM J. CHUTE WILLIAM J. CHUTE, formerly an Instructor in History at Rutgers, is now a member of the history faculty at Queens Collegey New York. N THE FALL of 1852 a young New Jersey scientist William Kitchell, 25 years of age, embarked for Germany in the fashion I of the day to acquire the advanced training which would pre- pare him for his position as professor of geology at the Newark Wesleyan Institute. He was accompanied by a friend, William H. Bradley, and upon arrival both matriculated at the Royal Saxon Mining Academy at Freiburg near Dresden. Sporadically during the next year and a half, Kitchell jotted down his impressions of a multitude of things in a diary—now in the possession of the Rutgers University Library. While his descriptive powers were limited and his style of writing would have received no prize for polish, the diary is informative and entertaining—the personal sketches of world famous men of science, the prevalence of soldiers in Berlin, the hor- rible climate, the slowness of transportation, his questioning of the authenticity of the Genesis story of the great flood are as interesting as the comical and persistent match-making innuendoes of his land- lady and the undisguised matrimonial suggestions of her unblushing daughter. Anecdotes of his American friends who later achieved re- nown are a welcome contribution to the biographer. Kitchell's own claim to fame was won as the director of the New Jersey Geological Survey begun in 1854.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Frontal Concepts Tn Meteorology
    HISTORY OF FRONTAL CONCEPTS TN METEOROLOGY: THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE NORWEGIAN THEORY by Gardner Perry III Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June, 1961 Signature of'Author . ~ . ........ Department of Humangties, May 17, 1959 Certified by . v/ .-- '-- -T * ~ . ..... Thesis Supervisor Accepted by Chairman0 0 e 0 o mmite0 0 Chairman, Departmental Committee on Theses II ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The research for and the development of this thesis could not have been nearly as complete as it is without the assistance of innumerable persons; to any that I may have momentarily forgotten, my sincerest apologies. Conversations with Professors Giorgio de Santilw lana and Huston Smith provided many helpful and stimulat- ing thoughts. Professor Frederick Sanders injected thought pro- voking and clarifying comments at precisely the correct moments. This contribution has proven invaluable. The personnel of the following libraries were most cooperative with my many requests for assistance: Human- ities Library (M.I.T.), Science Library (M.I.T.), Engineer- ing Library (M.I.T.), Gordon MacKay Library (Harvard), and the Weather Bureau Library (Suitland, Md.). Also, the American Meteorological Society and Mr. David Ludlum were helpful in suggesting sources of material. In getting through the myriad of minor technical details Professor Roy Lamson and Mrs. Blender were indis-. pensable. And finally, whatever typing that I could not find time to do my wife, Mary, has willingly done. ABSTRACT The frontal concept, as developed by the Norwegian Meteorologists, is the foundation of modern synoptic mete- orology. The Norwegian theory, when presented, was rapidly accepted by the world's meteorologists, even though its several precursors had been rejected or Ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details ‘Providence and Political Economy’: Josiah Tucker’s Providential Argument for Free Trade Peter Xavier Price PhD Thesis in Intellectual History University of Sussex April 2016 2 University of Sussex Peter Xavier Price Submitted for the award of a PhD in Intellectual History ‘Providence and Political Economy’: Josiah Tucker’s Providential Argument for Free Trade Thesis Summary Josiah Tucker, who was the Anglican Dean of Gloucester from 1758 until his death in 1799, is best known as a political pamphleteer, controversialist and political economist. Regularly called upon by Britain’s leading statesmen, and most significantly the Younger Pitt, to advise them on the best course of British economic development, in a large variety of writings he speculated on the consequences of North American independence for the global economy and for international relations; upon the complicated relations between small and large states; and on the related issue of whether low wage costs in poor countries might always erode the competitive advantage of richer nations, thereby establishing perpetual cycles of rise and decline.
    [Show full text]
  • Induction in the Socratic Tradition John P
    Induction in the Socratic Tradition John P. McCaskey Stanford University Abstract: Aristotle said that induction (epagǀgƝ) is a proceeding from particulars to a universal, and the definition has been conventional ever since. But there is an ambiguity here. Induction in the Scholastic and the (so-called) Humean tradition has presumed that Aristotle meant going from particular statements to universal statements. But the alternate view, namely that Aristotle meant going from particular things to universal ideas, prevailed all through antiquity and then again from the time of Francis Bacon until the mid-nineteenth century. Recent scholarship is so steeped in the first-mentioned tradition that we have virtually forgotten the other. In this essay McCaskey seeks to recover that alternate tradition, a tradition whose leading theoreticians were William Whewell, Francis Bacon, Socrates, and in fact Aristotle himself. The examination is both historical and philosophical. The first part of the essay fills out the history. The latter part examines the most mature of the philosophies in the Socratic tradition, specifically Bacon’s and Whewell’s. After tracing out this tradition, McCaskey shows how this alternate view of induction is indeed employed in science, as exemplified by several instances taken from actual scientific practice. In this manner, McCaskey proposes to us that the Humean problem of induction is merely an artifact of a bad conception of induction and that a return to the Socratic conception might be warranted. Introduction Aristotle said that induction (epagǀgƝ) is a proceeding from particulars to a universal, and the definition has been conventional ever since. But there is an ambiguity here.
    [Show full text]
  • The Synoptic Scientific Image in Early Modern Europe*
    | The Synoptic Scientific Image in Early Modern Europe | 159 | The Synoptic Scientific Image in Early Modern Europe * Lorraine DASTON ** T I. Seeing the Impossible the centaur (Fig. 1) or monstrous hybrids like this man-pig (Fig. 2). Rather, I have in mind more subtle Historians of Renaissance and early modern impossibilities, in which the cunning of the artist pan - European art have long remarked on the many ways ders to a certain yearning to see more broadly, in which drawings and paintings gave viewers a deeply, or sharply than located human vision ever glimpse of the impossible. By this I mean not only the could. obvious examples : images of fabulous creatures like This kind of illusion goes well beyond the trompe l’oeil mimesis of the still life, which after all only tricks the eye into thinking that the two-dimensional painting is a three-dimensional arrangement of per - fectly possible flowers, fruits, and other objects. Instead, the illusion stretches human vision to super - human feats of panoramic sweep (Fig. 3) 1, integra - tion of multiple viewpoints (Fig. 4) 2, or simultaneous focusing of foreground and background (Fig. 5) 3. These are not images of impossible objects but rather of impossible seeing. In this article, I would like to explore a kind of impos - sible seeing attempted time and time again in six - teenth- and seventeenth-century natural history, nat - ural philosophy, and even mathematics : synoptic see - ing, or seeing everything all at once, in one glance. The “ everything ” in question could be the patterns of Fig. 1. Centaur, Ulisse Aldrovandi, Monstrorum historia the prevailing winds across the globe or the type of a (Bologna, 1642) : 31.
    [Show full text]
  • Precipitation and Cocorahs Data in MO
    Received: 6 August 2017 Accepted: 10 October 2017 DOI: 10.1002/hyp.11381 RESEARCH ARTICLE The importance of choosing precipitation datasets Micheal J. Simpson1 | Adam Hirsch2 | Kevin Grempler2 | Anthony Lupo2,3 1 Water Resources Program, School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, 203‐T Abstract ABNR Building, Columbia, MO 65211, USA Precipitation data are important for hydrometeorological analyses, yet there are many ways to 2 Soil, Environmental, and Atmospheric Science measure precipitation. The impact of station density analysed by the current study by comparing Department, School of Natural Resources, measurements from the Missouri Mesonet available via the Missouri Climate Center and Commu- University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, nity Collaborative Rain, Hail, and Snow (CoCoRaHS) measurements archived at the program USA website. The CoCoRaHS data utilize citizen scientists to report precipitation data providing for 3 Department of Natural Resources Management and Land Cadastre, Belgorod much denser data resolution than available through the Mesonet. Although previous research State National Research University, Belgorod, has shown the reliability of CoCoRaHS data, the results here demonstrate important differences 308015, Russia in details of the spatial and temporal distribution of annual precipitation across the state of Correspondence Missouri using the two data sets. Furthermore, differences in the warm and cold season Micheal J. Simpson, University of Missouri, Water Resources Program, School of Natural distributions are presented, some of which may be related to interannual variability such as that Resources, 203‐T ABNR Building, Columbia associated with the El Niño and Southern Oscillation. The contradictory results from two 65211, MO, USA. widely‐used datasets display the importance in properly choosing precipitation data that have Email: [email protected] vastly differing temporal and spatial resolutions.
    [Show full text]
  • „Mächtig Anregender Kreis“ – Die Anfänge Der Physikalischen Gesellsc
    MAX-PLANCK-INSTITUT FÜR WISSENSCHAFTSGESCHICHTE Max Planck Institute for the History of Science PREPRINT 202 (2002) Horst Kant Ein „mächtig anregender Kreis“ – die Anfänge der Physikalischen Gesellschaft zu Berlin Ein „mächtig anregender Kreis“ – die Anfänge der Physikalischen Gesellschaft zu Berlin* Horst Kant Die Entstehung gelehrter naturwissenschaftlicher Vereine in der ersten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhun- derts resultierte vor allem aus dem allgemeinen Bildungsbedürfnis wohlhabenderer Bürgerkreise (in Handwerkerkreisen durch ein spezifischeres Interesse an verwertbarem neuen wissenschaft- lichen und technischen Wissen ergänzt); ihre Hauptaufgabe war demzufolge die „Belehrung“ und daneben die „Hobbyforschung“ – beides durchaus nicht negativ zu bewertende Zielsetzun- gen. Seinen eigentlichen Ursprung hat das naturwissenschaftlich-medizinische Vereinswesen in den Bestrebungen der Aufklärung. Vorläufer waren die wissenschaftlichen Akademien, die in erster Linie der Förderung der Forschung und der wissenschaftlichen Kommunikation dienten, zumeist vom staatlichen Souverän zu seinem eigenen Glanze protegiert. Dem mit der Aufklä- rung einhergehenden Bedürfnis nach Popularisierung (natur-)wissenschaftlichen Wissens dien- ten sie weniger. In diese Lücke stießen Ende des 18. Jahrhunderts naturwissenschaftliche Ver- einigungen wie die Berlinische Gesellschaft Naturforschender Freunde.1 Der Altertumswissen- schaftler und Sekretar der Berliner Akademie Hermann Diels (1848-1922) bezeichnete am Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts in seiner Betrachtung über die
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 08/10/2021 00:06:14
    Instructions to the Marine Meteorological Observers of the U. S. Weather Bureau, 4th edition. Item Type Book Publisher Government Printing Office Download date 08/10/2021 00:06:14 Item License http://www.oceandocs.org/license Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/5222 �'w. B. No. 866 U. s.(pEPARTMENTOF AGRICULTURE) WEATHER BUREAU INSTRUCTIONS TO MARINE METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVERS rr;e �� 4 c -s::r­ ho,M - M, MARIME f'IVTS!ON CIRCULAR FOURTH EDITION lfMed /9).5" WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFIOlll 1926 Blank page retained for pagination ILLUSTRATIONS Pnlle Barograph, Richard's----------------------------------------------­ aro B meter: 33 Jlnerold------------------------�--------------------------------- ]darlne__________________________________________________________ _ 32 _ _ __ llalos ____ ______________________________ __________ _____________ _ __ 24 g lly rogrnph, Rlchard's--�-------------------------------------------- 51 _ ll _______________________ __ ygrometer, with stationary thermometers 40 h __________________________________________________ Payc rometer, sling 40 r The mograph--------------------------------------------------------- 3U Thermometer supports_ ·---------------------------------------------­ · 38 er Th mometer, water------------------------------------------------­ 37 ime T chart, showing·local time corresponding to Greenwich mean noon__ 41 Ve rniers____________________________________________________________ _ 90 a W b1ings,' fiag· and lantern displaY----------------------------------- 28 eat ________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • November 2019
    A selection of some recent arrivals November 2019 Rare and important books & manuscripts in science and medicine, by Christian Westergaard. Flæsketorvet 68 – 1711 København V – Denmark Cell: (+45)27628014 www.sophiararebooks.com AMPÈRE, André-Marie. THE FOUNDATION OF ELECTRO- DYNAMICS, INSCRIBED BY AMPÈRE AMPÈRE, Andre-Marie. Mémoires sur l’action mutuelle de deux courans électri- ques, sur celle qui existe entre un courant électrique et un aimant ou le globe terres- tre, et celle de deux aimans l’un sur l’autre. [Paris: Feugeray, 1821]. $22,500 8vo (219 x 133mm), pp. [3], 4-112 with five folding engraved plates (a few faint scattered spots). Original pink wrappers, uncut (lacking backstrip, one cord partly broken with a few leaves just holding, slightly darkened, chip to corner of upper cov- er); modern cloth box. An untouched copy in its original state. First edition, probable first issue, extremely rare and inscribed by Ampère, of this continually evolving collection of important memoirs on electrodynamics by Ampère and others. “Ampère had originally intended the collection to contain all the articles published on his theory of electrodynamics since 1820, but as he pre- pared copy new articles on the subject continued to appear, so that the fascicles, which apparently began publication in 1821, were in a constant state of revision, with at least five versions of the collection appearing between 1821 and 1823 un- der different titles” (Norman). The collection begins with ‘Mémoires sur l’action mutuelle de deux courans électriques’, Ampère’s “first great memoir on electrody- namics” (DSB), representing his first response to the demonstration on 21 April 1820 by the Danish physicist Hans Christian Oersted (1777-1851) that electric currents create magnetic fields; this had been reported by François Arago (1786- 1853) to an astonished Académie des Sciences on 4 September.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Transactions (A)
    INDEX TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS (A) FOR THE YEAR 1889. A. A bney (W. de W.). Total Eclipse of the San observed at Caroline Island, on 6th May, 1883, 119. A bney (W. de W.) and T horpe (T. E.). On the Determination of the Photometric Intensity of the Coronal Light during the Solar Eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 363. Alcohol, a study of the thermal properties of propyl, 137 (see R amsay and Y oung). Archer (R. H.). Observations made by Newcomb’s Method on the Visibility of Extension of the Coronal Streamers at Hog Island, Grenada, Eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 382. Atomic weight of gold, revision of the, 395 (see Mallet). B. B oys (C. V.). The Radio-Micrometer, 159. B ryan (G. H.). The Waves on a Rotating Liquid Spheroid of Finite Ellipticity, 187. C. Conroy (Sir J.). Some Observations on the Amount of Light Reflected and Transmitted by Certain 'Kinds of Glass, 245. Corona, on the photographs of the, obtained at Prickly Point and Carriacou Island, total solar eclipse, August 29, 1886, 347 (see W esley). Coronal light, on the determination of the, during the solar eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 363 (see Abney and Thorpe). Coronal streamers, observations made by Newcomb’s Method on the Visibility of, Eclipse of August 28-29, 1886, 382 (see A rcher). Cosmogony, on the mechanical conditions of a swarm of meteorites, and on theories of, 1 (see Darwin). Currents induced in a spherical conductor by variation of an external magnetic potential, 513 (see Lamb). 520 INDEX.
    [Show full text]